Psychological resilience

Psychological resilience, or mental resilience, is the ability to cope mentally and emotionally with a crisis, or to return to pre-crisis status quickly.

The term was popularized in the 1970s and 1980s by psychologist Emmy Werner as she conducted a forty-year-long study of a cohort of Hawaiian children who came from low socioeconomic status backgrounds.

Numerous factors influence a person's level of resilience. Internal factors include personal characteristics such as self-esteem, self-regulation, and a positive outlook on life. External factors include social support systems, including relationships with family, friends, and community, as well as access to resources and opportunities.

People can leverage psychological interventions and other strategies to enhance their resilience and better cope with adversity. These include cognitive-behavioral techniques, mindfulness practices, building psychosocial factors, fostering positive emotions, and promoting self-compassion.

Overview

A resilient person uses "mental processes and behaviors in promoting personal assets and protecting self from the potential negative effects of stressors".Psychological resilience is an adaptation in a person's psychological traits and experiences that allows them to regain or remain in a healthy mental state during crises/chaos without long-term negative consequences.

It is difficult to measure and test this psychological construct because resilience can be interpreted in a variety of ways. Most psychological paradigms (biomedical, cognitive-behavioral, sociocultural, etc.) have their own perspective of what resilience looks like, where it comes from, and how it can be developed. There are numerous definitions of psychological resilience, most of which center around two concepts: adversity and positive adaptation. Positive emotions, social support, and hardiness can influence a person to become more resilient.

A psychologically resilient person can resist adverse mental conditions that are often associated with unfavorable life circumstances. This differs from psychological recovery which is associated with returning to those mental conditions that preceded a traumatic experience or personal loss.

Research on psychological resilience has shown that it plays a crucial role in promoting mental health and well-being. Resilient people are better equipped to navigate life's challenges, maintain positive emotions, and recover from setbacks. They demonstrate higher levels of self-efficacy, optimism, and problem-solving skills, which contribute to their ability to adapt and thrive in adverse situations.

Resilience is a "positive adaptation" after a stressful or adverse situation. When a person is "bombarded by daily stress, it disrupts their internal and external sense of balance, presenting challenges as well as opportunities." The routine stressors of daily life can have positive impacts which promote resilience. Some psychologists believe that it is not stress itself that promotes resilience but rather the person's perception of their stress and of their level of control.^{[page needed]} Stress allows people to practice resilience over time, different levels of stress vary among different individuals and the reason for that being is unknown. However, it is known that some people can handle stress better than others.

Stress can be experienced in a person's life course at times of difficult life transitions, involving developmental and social change; traumatic life events, including grief and loss; and environmental pressures, encompassing poverty and community violence.

Resilience is the integrated adaptation of physical, mental, and spiritual aspects to circumstances, and a coherent sense of self that is able to maintain normative developmental tasks that occur at various stages of life. The Children's Institute of the University of Rochester explains that "resilience research is focused on studying those who engage in life with hope and humor despite devastating losses".

Resilience is not only about overcoming a deeply stressful situation, but also coming out of such a situation with "competent functioning". Resiliency allows a person to rebound from adversity as a strengthened and more resourceful person.

Some characteristics associated with psychological resilience include: an easy temperament, good self-esteem, planning skills, and a supportive environment inside and outside of the family.

When an event is appraised as comprehensible (predictable), manageable (controllable), and somehow meaningful (explainable) a resilient response is more likely.

Process

Psychological resilience is commonly understood as a process. It can also be characterized as a tool a person develops over time, or as a personal trait of the person ("resiliency"). Most research shows resilience as the result of people being able to interact with their environments and participate in processes that either promote well-being or protect them against the overwhelming influence of relative risk. This research supports the model in which psychological resilience is seen as a process rather than a trait—something to develop or pursue, rather than a static endowment or endpoint.

When people are faced with an adverse condition, there are three ways in which they may approach the situation.

1. respond with anger or aggression
2. become overwhelmed and shut down
3. feel the emotion about the situation and appropriately handle the emotion

Resilience is promoted through the third approach, which is employed by individuals who adapt and change their current patterns to cope with disruptive states, thereby enhancing their well-being.In contrast, the first and second approaches lead individuals to adopt a victim mentality, blaming others and rejecting coping methods even after a crisis has passed. These individuals tend to react instinctively rather than respond thoughtfully, clinging to negative emotions such as fear, anger, anxiety, distress, helplessness, and hopelessness. Such emotions decrease problem-solving abilities and weaken resilience, making it harder to recover. Resilient people, on the other hand, actively cope, bounce back, and find solutions. Their resilience is further supported by protective environments, including good families, schools, communities, and social policies, which provide cumulative protective factors that bolster their ability to withstand and recover from exposure to risk factors.

Resilience can be viewed as a developmental process (the process of developing resilience), or as indicated by a response process. In the latter approach, the effects of an event or stressor on a situationally relevant indicator variable are studied, distinguishing immediate responses, dynamic responses, and recovery patterns. In response to a stressor, more-resilient people show some (but less than less-resilient people) increase in stress. The speed with which this stress response returns to pre-stressor levels is also indicative of a person's resilience.

Biological models

From a scientific standpoint, resilience’s contested definition is multifaceted in relation to genetics, revealing a complex link between biological mechanisms and resilience:

"Resilience, conceptualized as a positive bio-psychological adaptation, has proven to be a useful theoretical context for understanding variables for predicting long-term health and well-being".

Three notable bases for resilience—self-confidence, self-esteem and self-concept—each have roots in a different nervous system—respectively, the somatic nervous system, the autonomic nervous system, and the central nervous system.

Research indicates that, like trauma, resilience is influenced by epigenetic modifications. Increased DNA methylation of the growth factor GDNF in certain brain regions promotes stress resilience, as do molecular adaptations of the blood–brain barrier.

The two neurotransmitters primarily responsible for stress buffering within the brain are dopamine and endogenous opioids, as evidenced by research showing that dopamine and opioid antagonists increased stress response in both humans and animals. Primary and secondary rewards reduce negative reactivity. Primary rewards are stimuli that are attributed to basic needs, such as water, food, and physical well-being. On the other hand, secondary rewards are accomplished by experiences or social interactions ^{[definition needed]} of stress in the brain in both humans and animals. The relationship between social support and stress resilience is thought to be mediated by the oxytocin system's impact on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.

Alongside such neurotransmitters, stress-induced alterations in brain structures, such as the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and hippocampus have been linked to mental health issues like depression and anxiety. The increased activation of the medial prefrontal cortex and glutamatergic circuits has emerged as a potential factor in enhancing resilience as “environmental enrichment… increases the complexity of… pyramidal neurons in hippocampus and PFC, suggesting… a shared feature of resilience under these two distinct condition[s]."

History

The first research on resilience was published in 1973. The study used epidemiology—the study of disease prevalence—to uncover the risks and the protective factors that now help define resilience. A year later, the same group of researchers created tools to look at systems that support development of resilience.

Emmy Werner was one of the early scientists to use the term resilience. She studied a cohort of children from Kauai, Hawaii. Kauai was quite poor and many of the children in the study grew up with alcoholic or mentally ill parents. Many of the parents were also out of work. Werner noted that of the children who grew up in these detrimental situations, two-thirds exhibited destructive behaviors in their later-teen years, such as chronic unemployment, substance abuse, and out-of-wedlock births (in girls). However, one-third of these youths did not exhibit destructive behaviors. Werner called the latter group resilient. Thus, resilient children and their families were those who, by definition, demonstrated traits that allowed them to be more successful than non-resilient children and families.

Resilience also emerged as a major theoretical and research topic in the 1980s in studies of children with mothers diagnosed with schizophrenia. A 1989 study showed that children with a schizophrenic parent may not obtain an appropriate level of comforting caregiving—compared to children with healthy parents—and that such situations often had a detrimental impact on children's development. On the other hand, some children of ill parents thrived and were competent in academic achievement, which led researchers to make efforts to understand such responses to adversity.

Since the onset of the research on resilience, researchers have been devoted to discovering protective factors that explain people's adaptation to adverse conditions, such as maltreatment, catastrophic life events, or urban poverty. Researchers endeavor to uncover how some factors (e.g. connection to family) may contribute to positive outcomes.

Trait resilience

Temperamental and constitutional disposition is a major factor in resilience. It is one of the necessary precursors of resilience along with warmth in family cohesion and accessibility of prosocial support systems. There are three kinds of temperamental systems that play part in resilience: the appetitive system, defensive system, and attentional system.

Trait resilience is negatively correlated with the personality traits of neuroticism and negative emotionality, which represent tendencies to see and react to the world as threatening, problematic, and distressing, and to view oneself as vulnerable. Trait resilience is positively correlated with personality traits of openness and positive emotionality, which are associated with tendencies to approach and confront problems with confidence, while also maintaining autonomy and fostering adaptability to those life changes.

Resilience traits are personal characteristics that express how people approach and react to events that they experience as negative. Trait resilience is generally considered via two methods: direct assessment of traits through resilience measures and proxy assessments of resilience in which existing cognate psychological constructs are used to explain resilient outcomes. Typically, trait resilience measures explore how individuals tend to react to and cope with adverse events. Proxy assessments of resilience, sometimes referred to as the buffering approach, view resilience as the antithesis of risk, focusing on how psychological processes interrelate with negative events to mitigate their effects. Possibly an individual perseverance trait, conceptually related to persistence and resilience, could also be measured behaviorally by means of arduous, difficult, or otherwise unpleasant tasks.

Developing and sustaining resilience

There are several theories or models that attempt to describe subcomponents, prerequisites, predictors, or correlates of resilience.

Fletcher and Sarkar found five factors that develop and sustain a person's resilience:

1. the ability to make realistic plans and being capable of taking the steps necessary to follow through with them
2. confidence in one's strengths and abilities
3. communication and problem-solving skills
4. the ability to manage strong impulses and feelings
5. having good self-esteem

Among older adults, Kamalpour et al. found that the important factors are external connections, grit, independence, self-care, self-acceptance, altruism, hardship experience, health status, and positive perspective on life.

Another study examined thirteen high-achieving professionals who seek challenging situations that require resilience, all of whom had experienced challenges in the workplace and negative life events over the course of their careers but who had also been recognized for their great achievements in their respective fields. Participants were interviewed about everyday life in the workplace as well as their experiences with resilience and thriving. The study found six main predictors of resilience: positive and proactive personality, experience and learning, sense of control, flexibility and adaptability, balance and perspective, and perceived social support. High achievers were also found to engage in many activities unrelated to their work such as engaging in hobbies, exercising, and organizing meetups with friends and loved ones.

The American Psychological Association, in its popular psychology-oriented Psychology topics publication, suggests the following tactics people can use to build resilience:

• Prioritize relationships.
• Join a social group.
• Take care of your body.
• Practice mindfulness.
• Avoid negative coping outlets (like alcohol use).
• Help others.
• Be proactive; search for solutions.
• Make progress toward your goals.
• Look for opportunities for self-discovery.
• Keep things in perspective.
• Accept change.
• Maintain a hopeful outlook.
• Learn from your past.

The idea that one can build one's resilience implies that resilience is a developable characteristic, and so is perhaps at odds with the theory that resilience is a process.

Positive emotions

The relationship between positive emotions and resilience has been extensively studied. People who maintain positive emotions while they face adversity are more flexibile in their thinking and problem solving. Positive emotions also help people recover from stressful experiences. People who maintain positive emotions are better-defended from the physiological effects of negative emotions, and are better-equipped to cope adaptively, to build enduring social resources, and to enhance their well-being.

The ability to consciously monitor the factors that influence one's mood is correlated with a positive emotional state. This is not to say that positive emotions are merely a by-product of resilience, but rather that feeling positive emotions during stressful experiences may have adaptive benefits in the coping process. Resilient people who have a propensity for coping strategies that concretely elicit positive emotions—such as benefit-finding and cognitive reappraisal, humor, optimism, and goal-directed problem-focused coping—may strengthen their resistance to stress by allocating more access to these positive emotional resources. Social support from caring adults encouraged resilience among participants by providing them with access to conventional activities.^[relevant?]

Positive emotions have physiological consequences. For example, humor leads to improvements in immune system functioning and increases in levels of salivary immunoglobulin A, a vital system antibody, which serves as the body's first line of defense in respiratory illnesses. Other health outcomes^{[clarification needed]} include faster injury recovery rate and lower readmission rates to hospitals for the elderly, and reductions in the length of hospital stay.^{[citation needed]} One study has found early indications that older adults who have increased levels of psychological resilience have decreased odds of death or inability to walk after recovering from hip fracture surgery. In another study, trait-resilient individuals experiencing positive emotions more quickly rebounded from cardiovascular activation that was initially generated by negative emotional arousal.

Social support

Social support is an important factor in the development of resilience. While many competing definitions of social support exist, they tend to concern one's degree of access to, and use of, strong ties to other people who are similar to oneself. Social support requires solidarity and trust, intimate communication, and mutual obligation both within and outside the family.

Military studies have found that resilience is also dependent on group support: unit cohesion and morale is the best predictor of combat resiliency within a unit or organization. Resilience is highly correlated with peer support and group cohesion. Units with high cohesion tend to experience a lower rate of psychological breakdowns than units with low cohesion and morale. High cohesion and morale enhance adaptive stress reactions. War veterans who had more social support were less likely to develop post-traumatic stress disorder.

Cognitive behavioral therapy

A number of self-help approaches to resilience-building have been developed, drawing mainly on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT). For example, a group cognitive-behavioral intervention, called the Penn Resiliency Program (PRP), fosters aspects of resilience. A meta-analysis of 17 PRP studies showed that the intervention significantly reduces depressive symptoms over time.

In CBT, building resilience is a matter of mindfully changing behaviors and thought patterns. The first step is to change the nature of self-talk—the internal monologue people have that reinforces beliefs about their self-efficacy and self-value. To build resilience, a person needs to replace negative self-talk, such as "I can't do this" and "I can't handle this", with positive self-talk. This helps to reduce psychological stress when a person faces a difficult challenge. The second step is to prepare for challenges, crises, and emergencies. Businesses prepare by creating emergency response plans, business continuity plans, and contingency plans. Similarly, an individual can create a financial cushion to help with economic stressors, maintain supportive social networks, and develop emergency response plans.

Language learning and communication

Language learning and communication help develop resilience in people who travel, study abroad, work internationally, or in those who find themselves as refugees in countries where their home language is not spoken.

Research conducted by the British Council found a strong relationship between language and resilience in refugees. Providing adequate English-learning programs and support for Syrian refugees builds resilience not only in the individual, but also in the host community. Language builds resilience in five ways:

home language and literacy development

Development of home language and literacy helps create the foundation for a shared identity. By maintaining the home language, even when displaced, a person not only learns better in school, but enhances their ability to learn other languages. This improves resilience by providing a shared culture and sense of identity that allows refugees to maintain close relationships to others who share their identity and sets them up to possibly return one day.

access to education, training, and employment

This allows refugees to establish themselves in their host country and provides more ease when attempting to access information, apply to work or school, or obtain professional documentation. Securing access to education or employment is largely dependent on language competency, and both education and employment provide security and success that enhance resilience and confidence.

learning together and social cohesion

Learning together encourages resilience through social cohesion and networks. When refugees engage in language-learning activities with host communities, engagement and communication increases. Both refugee and host community are more likely to celebrate diversity, share their stories, build relationships, engage in the community, and provide each other with support. This creates a sense of belonging with the host communities alongside the sense of belonging established with other members of the refugee community through home language.

addressing the effects of trauma on learning

Additionally, language programs and language learning can help address the effects of trauma by providing a means to discuss and understand. Refugees are more capable of expressing their trauma, including the effects of loss, when they can effectively communicate with their host community. Especially in schools, language learning establishes safe spaces through storytelling, which further reinforces comfort with a new language, and can in turn lead to increased resilience.

building inclusivity

This is more focused on providing resources. By providing institutions or schools with more language-based learning and cultural material, the host community can learn how to better address the needs of the refugee community. This feeds back into the increased resilience of refugees by creating a sense of belonging and community.

Another study shows the impacts of storytelling in building resilience. It aligns with many of the five factors identified by the study completed by the British Council, as it emphasizes the importance of sharing traumatic experiences through language. It showed that those who were exposed to more stories, from family or friends, had a more holistic view of life's struggles, and were thus more resilient, especially when surrounded by foreign languages or attempting to learn a new language.

Development programs

The Head Start program promotes resilience, as does the Big Brothers Big Sisters Programme,^{[citation needed]} Centered Coaching & Consulting,^{[citation needed]}, the Abecedarian Early Intervention Project, and social programs for youth with emotional or behavioral difficulties.

The Positive Behavior Supports and Intervention program is a trauma-informed, resilience-based program for elementary age students.^[promotion?] It has four components: positive reinforcements such as encouraging feedback; understanding that behavior is a response to unmet needs or a survival response; promoting belonging, mastery, and independence; and creating an environment to support the student through sensory tools, mental health breaks, and play.

Tuesday's Children, a family service organization, works to build psychological resilience through programs such as Mentoring and Project Common Bond, an eight-day peace-building and leadership initiative for people aged 15–20, from around the world, who have been directly impacted by terrorism.^[promotion?]

Military organizations test personnel for the ability to function under stressful circumstances by deliberately subjecting them to stress during training. Those students who do not exhibit the necessary resilience can be screened out of the training. Those who remain can be given stress inoculation training. The process is repeated as personnel apply for increasingly demanding positions, such as special forces.

Other factors

Another protective factor involves external social support, which helps moderate the negative effects of environmental hazards or stressful situations and guides vulnerable individuals toward optimistic paths.^{[citation needed]} One study distinguished three contexts for protective factors:

1. Personal Attributes: Traits such as an outgoing personality, perceptiveness, and a positive self-concept.
2. Family Environment: Close and supportive relationships with at least one family member or an emotionally stable parent.
3. Community Support: Support and guidance from peers and community members.

A study of the elderly in Zurich, Switzerland, illuminated the role humor plays to help people remain happy in the face of age-related adversity.

Research has also been conducted into individual differences in resilience. Self-esteem, ego-control, and ego-resiliency are related to behavioral adaptation^{[definition needed]}. Maltreated children who feel good about themselves may process risk situations differently by attributing different reasons to the environments they experience^{[clarification needed]} and, thereby, avoiding negative internalized self-perceptions. Ego-control is "the threshold or operating characteristics of an individual with regard to the expression or containment"^: 43 of their impulses, feelings, and desires. Ego-resilience refers to the "dynamic capacity^{[definition needed]}, to modify his or her model level^{[definition needed]} of ego-control, in either direction, as a function of the demand characteristics^{[definition needed]} of the environmental context"^: 43

Demographic information (e.g., gender) and resources (e.g., social support) also predict resilience. After disaster women tend to show less resilience than men, and people who were less involved in affinity groups and organisations also showed less resilience.

Certain aspects of religions, spirituality, or mindfulness could promote or hinder certain psychological virtues that increase resilience. However, as of 2009^[update] the "there has not yet been much direct empirical research looking specifically at the association of religion and ordinary strengths and virtues". In a review of the literature on the relationship between religiosity/spirituality and PTSD, about half of the studies showed a positive relationship and half showed a negative relationship between measures of religiosity/spirituality and resilience. The United States Army was criticized for promoting spirituality in its Comprehensive Soldier Fitness program as a way to prevent PTSD, due to the lack of conclusive supporting data.

Forgiveness plays a role in resilience among patients with chronic pain (but not in the severity of the pain).^{[clarification needed]}

Resilience is also enhanced in people who develop effective coping skills for stress. Coping skills help people reduce stress levels, so they remain functional. Coping skills include using meditation, exercise, socialization, and self-care practices to maintain a healthy level of stress.

Bibliotherapy, positive tracking of events, and enhancing psychosocial protective factors with positive psychological resources are other methods for resilience building. Increasing a person's arsenal of coping skills builds resilience.

A study of 230 adults, diagnosed with depression and anxiety, showed that emotional regulation contributed to resilience in patients. The emotional regulation strategies focused on planning, positively reappraising events, and reducing rumination. Patients with improved resilience experienced better treatment outcomes than patients with non-resilience focused treatment plans. This suggests psychotherapeutic interventions may better handle mental disorders by focusing on psychological resilience.

Other factors associated with resilience include the capacity to make realistic plans, self-confidence and a positive self image,communications skills, and the capacity to manage strong feelings and impulses.

Children

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are events that occur in a child's life that could lead to maladaptive symptoms such as tension, low mood, repetitive and recurring thoughts, and avoidance of things associated with the adverse event^[vague].

Maltreated children who experience some risk factors (e.g., single parenting, limited maternal education, or family unemployment), show lower ego-resilience and intelligence than children who were not maltreated. Maltreated children are also more likely to withdraw and demonstrate disruptive-aggressive and internalized^{[clarification needed]} behavior problems. Ego-resiliency and positive self-esteem predict competent adaptation^{[definition needed]} in maltreated children.

Psychological resilience which helps overcome adverse events does not solely explain why some children experience post-traumatic growth and some do not.

Resilience is the product of a number of developmental processes over time that allow children to experience small exposures to adversity or age appropriate challenges and develop skills to handle those challenges. This gives children a sense of pride and self-worth.

Two "protective factors"—characteristics of children or situations that help children in the context of risk—are good cognitive functioning (like cognitive self-regulation^{[definition needed]} and IQ) and positive relationships (especially with competent adults, like parents). Children who have protective factors in their lives tend to do better in some risky contexts. However, children do better when not exposed to high levels of risk or adversity.

There are a few protective factors of young children that are consistent over differences in culture and stressors (poverty, war, divorce of parents, natural disasters, etc.):

• capable parenting
• other close relationships
• intelligence
• self-control
• motivation to succeed
• self-confidence and self-efficacy
• faith, hope, belief life has meaning
• effective^[specify] schools
• effective^[specify] communities
• effective^[specify] cultural practices

Ann Masten calls these protective factors "ordinary magic"—the ordinary human adaptive systems that are shaped by biological and cultural evolution. In her book, Ordinary Magic: Resilience in Development, she discusses the "immigrant paradox", the phenomenon that first-generation immigrant youth are more resilient than their children. Researchers hypothesize that "there may be culturally based resiliency that is lost with succeeding generations as they become distanced from their culture of origin." Another hypothesis is that those who choose to immigrate are more likely to be more resilient.

Neurocognitive resilience

Trauma is defined as an emotional response to distressing event, and PTSD is a mental disorder the develops after a person has experienced a dangerous event, for instance car accident or environmental disaster. The findings of a study conducted on a sample of 226 individuals who had experienced trauma indicate a positive association between resilience and enhanced nonverbal memory, as well as a measure of emotional learning. The findings of the study indicate that individuals who exhibited resilience demonstrated a lower incidence of depressed and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Conversely, those who lacked resilience exhibited a higher likelihood of experiencing unemployment and having a history of suicide attempts. The research additionally revealed that the experience of severe childhood abuse or exposure to trauma was correlated with a lack of resilience. The results indicate that resilience could potentially serve as a substitute measure for emotional learning, a process that is frequently impaired in stress-related mental disorders. This finding has the potential to enhance our comprehension of resilience.

Young adults

Sports provide benefits such as social support or a boost in self confidence. The findings of a study investigating the correlation between resilience and symptom resolution in adolescents and young adults who have experienced sport-related concussions (SRC) indicate that individuals with lower initial resilience ratings tend to exhibit a higher number and severity of post-concussion symptoms (PCSS), elevated levels of anxiety and depression, and a delayed recovery process from SRC. Additionally, the research revealed that those who initially scored lower on resilience assessments were less inclined to describe a sense of returning to their pre-injury state and experienced more pronounced exacerbation of symptoms resulting from both physical and cognitive exertion, even after resuming sports or physical activity. This finding illustrates the significant impact that resilience can have on the process of physical and mental recovery.

Role of the family

Family environments that are caring and stable, hold high expectations for children's behavior, and encourage participation by children in the life of the family are environments that more successfully foster resilience in children. Most resilient children have a strong relationship with at least one adult (not always a parent), and this relationship helps to diminish risk associated with family discord.

Parental resilience—the ability of parents to deliver competent high-quality parenting, despite the presence of risk factors—plays an important role in children's resilience. Understanding the characteristics of quality parenting is critical to the idea of parental resilience. However, resilience research has focused on the well-being of children, with limited academic attention paid to factors that may contribute to the resilience of parents.

Even if divorce produces stress, the availability of social support from family and community can reduce this stress and yield positive outcomes.

A family that emphasizes the value of assigned chores, caring for brothers or sisters, and the contribution of part-time work in supporting the family helps to foster resilience.

Some practices that poor parents utilize help to promote resilience in families. These include frequent displays of warmth, affection, and emotional support; reasonable expectations for children combined with straightforward, not overly harsh discipline; family routines and celebrations; and the maintenance of common values regarding money and leisure. According to sociologist Christopher B. Doob, "Poor children growing up in resilient families have received significant support for doing well as they enter the social world—starting in daycare programs and then in schooling."

The Besht model of natural resilience-building through parenting, in an ideal family with positive access and support from family and friends, has four key markers:^{[citation needed]}

1. realistic upbringing
2. effective risk communications
3. positivity and restructuring of demanding situations
4. building self efficacy and hardiness

In this model, self-efficacy is the belief in one's ability to organize and execute the courses of action required to achieve goals and hardiness is a composite of interrelated attitudes of commitment, control, and challenge.^{[citation needed]}

Role of school

Resilient children in classroom environments work and play well^{[when defined as?]}, hold high expectations, and demonstrate locus of control, self-esteem, self-efficacy, and autonomy. These things work together to prevent the debilitating behaviors that are associated with learned helplessness.

Research on Mexican–American high school students found that a sense of belonging to school was the only significant predictor of academic resilience, though a sense of belonging to family, a peer group, and a culture can also indicate^{[clarification needed]} higher academic resilience. "Although cultural loyalty overall was not a significant predictor of resilience, certain cultural influences nonetheless contribute to resilient outcomes, like familism and cultural pride and awareness." The results "indicate a negative relationship between cultural pride and the ethnic homogeneity of a school." The researchers hypothesize that "ethnicity becomes a salient and important characteristic in more ethnically diverse settings".

A strong connection with one's cultural identity is an important protective factor against stress and is indicative of increased resilience. While classroom resources have been created to promote resilience in students, the most effective ways to ensure resilience in children is by protecting their natural adaptive systems from breaking down or being hijacked.^{[citation needed]} At home, resilience can be promoted through a positive^{[when defined as?]} home environment and emphasizing cultural practices and values. In school, this can be done by ensuring that each student develops and maintains a sense of belonging to the school through positive relationships with classroom peers and a caring teacher. A sense of belonging—whether it be in a culture, family, or another group—predicts resiliency against any given stressor.

Role of the community

Communities play a role in fostering resilience. The clearest sign of a cohesive and supportive community is the presence of social organizations that provide healthy human development. Services are unlikely to be used unless there is good communication about them. Children who are repeatedly relocated do not benefit from these resources, as their opportunities for resilience-building community participation are disrupted with every relocation.

Outcomes in adulthood

Patients who show resilience to adverse events in childhood may have worse outcomes later in life. A study in the American Journal of Psychiatry interviewed 1420 participants with a Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Assessment up to 8 times as children. Of those 1,266 were interviewed as adults, and this group had higher risks for anxiety, depression and problems with work or education. This was accompanied by worse physical health outcomes. The study authors posit that the goal of public health should be to reduce childhood trauma, and not promote resilience.

Specific situations

Divorce

Cultivating resilience may be beneficial to all parties involved in divorce. The level of resilience a child will experience after their parents have split is dependent on both internal and external variables. Some of these variables include their psychological and physical state and the level of support they receive from their schools, friends, and family friends. Children differ^[specify] by age, gender, and temperament in their capacity to cope with divorce. About 20–25% of children "demonstrate severe emotional and behavioral problems" when going through a divorce, compared to 10% of children exhibiting similar problems in married families. Despite this, approximately 75–80% of these^[specify] children will "develop into well-adjusted adults with no lasting psychological or behavioral problems". This goes to show that most children have the resilience needed to endure their parents' divorce.

The effects of the divorce extend past the separation of the parents. Residual conflict between parents, financial problems, and the re-partnering or remarriage of parents can cause stress. Studies have shown conflicting results about the effect of post-divorce conflict on a child's healthy adjustment. Divorce may reduce children's financial means and associated lifestyle. For example, economizing may mean a child cannot continue to participate in extracurricular activities such as sports and music lessons, which can be detrimental to their social lives.

A parent's repartnering or remarrying can add conflict and anger to a child's home environment. One reason re-partnering causes additional stress is because of the lack of clarity in roles and relationships; the child may not know how to react and behave with this new quasi-parent figure in their life. Bringing in a new partner/spouse may be most stressful when done shortly after the divorce. Divorce is not a single event, but encompasses multiple changes and challenges. Internal factors promote resiliency in the child, as do external factors in the environment. Certain programs such as the 14-week Children's Support Group and the Children of Divorce Intervention Program may help a child cope with the changes that occur from a divorce.

Bullying

Beyond preventing bullying, it is also important to consider interventions based on emotional intelligence when bullying occurs. Emotional intelligence may foster resilience in victims. When a person faces stress and adversity, especially of a repetitive nature, their ability to adapt is an important factor in whether they have a more positive or negative outcome.

One study examining adolescents who illustrated resilience to bullying found higher behavioral resilience in girls and higher emotional resilience in boys. The study's authors suggested the targeting of psychosocial skills as a form of intervention. Emotional intelligence promotes resilience to stress and the ability to manage stress and other negative emotions can restrain a victim from going on to perpetuate aggression. Emotion regulation is an important factor in resilience. Emotional perception significantly facilitates lower negative emotionality during stress, while emotional understanding facilitates resilience and correlates with positive affect.

Natural disasters

Resilience after a natural disaster can be gauged on an individual level (each person in the community), a community level (everyone collectively in the affected locality), and on a physical level (the locality's environment and infrastructure).

UNESCAP-funded research on how communities show resiliency in the wake of natural disasters found that communities were more physically resilient if community members banded together and made resiliency a collective effort. Social support, especially the ability to pool resources, is key to resilience. Communities that pooled social, natural, and economic resources were more resilient and could overcome disasters more quickly than communities that took a more individualistic approach.

The World Economic Forum met in 2014 to discuss resiliency after natural disasters. They concluded that countries that are more economically sound^{[when defined as?]}, and whose members can diversify their livelihoods, show higher levels of resiliency. As of 2014^[update] this had not been studied in depth, but the ideas discussed in this forum appeared fairly consistent with existing research.

Individual resilience in the wake of natural disasters can be predicted by the level of emotion the person experienced and was able to process during and following the disaster. Those who employ emotional styles of coping were able to grow from their experiences and to help others. In these instances, experiencing emotions was adaptive. Those who did not engage with their emotions and who employed avoidant and suppressive coping styles had poorer mental health outcomes following disaster.

Death of a family member

As of 2006^[update] little research had been done on the topic of family resilience in the wake of the death of a family member. Clinical attention to bereavement has focused on the individual mourning process rather than on the family unit as a whole. Resiliency in this context is the "ability to maintain a stable equilibrium" that is conducive to balance, harmony, and recovery. Families manage familial distortions caused by the death of the family member by reorganizing relationships and changing patterns of functioning to adapt to their new situation. People who exhibiting resilience in the wake of trauma can successfully traverse the bereavement process without long-term negative consequences.

One of the healthiest behaviors displayed by resilient families in the wake of a death is honest and open communication. This facilitates an understanding of the crisis. Sharing the experience of the death can promote immediate and long-term adaptation. Empathy is a crucial component in familial resilience because it allows mourners to understand other positions, tolerate conflict, and grapple with differences that may arise. Another crucial component to resilience is the maintenance of a routine that binds the family together through regular contact and order. The continuation of education and a connection with peers and teachers at school is an important support for children struggling with the death of a family member.

Professional settings

Resilience^[specify] has been examined in the context of failure and setbacks in workplace settings. Psychological resilience is one of the core constructs of positive organizational behavior and has captured scholars' and practitioners' attention. Research has highlighted certain personality traits, personal resources (e.g., self-efficacy, work-life balance, social competencies), personal attitudes (e.g., sense of purpose, job commitment), positive emotions, and work resources (e.g., social support, positive organizational context) as potential facilitators of workplace resilience.

Attention has also been directed to the role of resilience in innovative contexts. Due to high degrees of uncertainty and complexity in the innovation process, failure and setbacks happen frequently in this context. These can harm affected individuals' motivation and willingness to take risks, so their resilience is essential for them to productively engage in future innovative activities. A resilience construct specifically aligned to the peculiarities of the innovation context was needed to diagnose and develop innovators' resilience: Innovator Resilience Potential (IRP). Based on Bandura's social cognitive theory, IRP has six components: self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, optimism, hope, self-esteem, and risk propensity. It reflects a process perspective on resilience: IRP can be interpreted either as an antecedent of how a setback affects an innovator, or as an outcome of the process that is influenced by the setback situation. A measurement scale of IRP was developed and validated in 2018.

Cultural differences

There is controversy about the indicators of good psychological and social development when resilience is studied across different cultures and contexts. The American Psychological Association's Task Force on Resilience and Strength in Black Children and Adolescents, for example, notes that there may be special skills that these young people and families have that help them cope, including the ability to resist racial prejudice. Researchers of indigenous health have shown the impact of culture, history, community values, and geographical settings on resilience in indigenous communities. People who cope may also show "hidden resilience" when they do not conform with society's expectations for how someone is supposed to behave (for example, in some contexts aggression may aid resilience, or less emotional engagement may be protective in situations of abuse).

Resilience in individualist and collectivist communities

Individualist cultures, such as those of the U.S., Austria, Spain, and Canada, emphasize personal goals, initiatives, and achievements. Independence, self-reliance, and individual rights are highly valued by members of individualistic cultures. The ideal person in individualist societies is assertive, strong, and innovative. People in this culture tend to describe themselves in terms of their unique traits—"I am analytical and curious".^{[full citation needed]} Economic, political, and social policies reflect the culture's interest in individualism.

Collectivist cultures, such as those of Japan, Sweden, Turkey, and Guatemala, emphasize family and group work goals. The rules of these societies promote unity, brotherhood, and selflessness. Families and communities practice cohesion and cooperation. The ideal person in collectivist societies is trustworthy, honest, sensitive, and generous—emphasizing intrapersonal skills. Collectivists tend to describe themselves in terms of their roles—"I am a good husband and a loyal friend".^{[full citation needed]}

In a study on the consequences of disaster on a culture's individualism, researchers operationalized these cultures by identifying indicative phrases in a society's literature. Words that showed the theme of individualism include, "able, achieve, differ, own, personal, prefer, and special." Words that indicated collectivism include, "belong, duty, give, harmony, obey, share, together."

Differences in response to natural disasters

Natural disasters threaten to destroy communities, displace families, degrade cultural integrity, and diminish an individual's level of functioning. Comparing individualist community reactions to collectivist community responses after natural disasters illustrates their differences and respective strengths as tools of resilience.

Some suggest that because disasters strengthen the need to rely on other people and social structures, they reduce individual agency and the sense of autonomy, and so regions with heightened exposure to disaster should cultivate collectivism. However, interviews with and experiments on disaster survivors indicate that disaster-induced anxiety and stress decrease one's focus on social-contextual information—a key component of collectivism. So disasters may increase individualism.

In a study into the association between socio-ecological indicators and cultural-level change in individualism, for each socio-ecological indicator, frequency of disasters was associated with greater (rather than less) individualism. Supplementary analyses indicated that the frequency of disasters was more strongly correlated with individualism-related shifts than was the magnitude of disasters or the frequency of disasters qualified by the number of deaths.^{[full citation needed]}

Baby-naming is one indicator of change. Urbanization was linked to preference for uniqueness in baby-naming practices at a one-year lag, secularism was linked to individualist shifts in interpersonal structure at both^[specify] lags, and disaster prevalence was linked to more unique naming practices at both^[specify] lags.^{[full citation needed]} Secularism and disaster prevalence contributed mainly^[vague] to shifts in naming practices.

Disaster recovery research focuses on psychology and social systems but does not adequately address interpersonal networking or relationship formation and maintenance. One disaster response theory holds that people who use existing communication networks fare better during and after disasters. Moreover, they can play important roles in disaster recovery by organizing and helping others use communication networks and by coordinating with institutions.

Building strong, self-reliant communities whose members know each other, know each other's needs, and are aware of existing communication networks, is a possible source of resilience in disasters.

Individualist societies promote individual responsibility for self-sufficiency; collectivist culture defines self-sufficiency within an interdependent communal context. Even where individualism is salient, a group thrives when its members choose social over personal goals and seek to maintain harmony, and where they value collectivist over individualist behavior.

The concept of resilience in language

While not all languages have a direct translation for the English word "resilience", nearly every culture has a word that relates to a similar concept, suggesting a common understanding of what resilience is. Even if a word does not directly translate to "resilience" in English, it relays a meaning similar enough to the concept and is used as such within the language.

If a specific word for resilience does not exist in a language, speakers of that language typically assign a similar word that insinuates resilience based on context. Many languages use words that translate to "elasticity" or "bounce", which are used in context to capture the meaning of resilience. For example, one of the main words for "resilience" in Chinese literally translates to "rebound", one of the main words for "resilience" in Greek translates to "bounce" (another translates to "cheerfulness"), and one of the main words for "resilience" in Russian translates to "elasticity," just as it does in German. However, this is not the case for all languages. For example, if a Spanish speaker wanted to say "resilience", their main two options translate to "resistance" and "defense against adversity". Many languages have words that translate better to "tenacity" or "grit" better than they do to "resilience". While these languages may not have a word that exactly translates to "resilience", English speakers often use the words tenacity or grit when referring to resilience. Arabic has a word solely for resilience, but also two other common expressions to relay the concept, which directly translate to "capacity on deflation" or "reactivity of the body", but are better translated as "impact strength" and "resilience of the body" respectively. A few languages, such as Finnish, have words that express resilience in a way that cannot be translated back to English. In Finnish, the word and concept "sisu" has been recently studied by a designated Sisu Scale, which is composed of both beneficial and harmful sides of sisu.Sisu, measured by the Sisu Scale, has correlations with English langugage equivalents, but the harmful side of sisu does not seem to have any corresponding concept in English-language-based scales. Sometimes sisu has been translated to "grit" in English; sisu blends the concepts of resilience, tenacity, determination, perseverance, and courage into one word that has become a facet of Finnish culture.

Measurement

Direct measurement

Resilience is measured by evaluating personal qualities that reflect people's approach and response to negative experiences. Trait resilience is typically assessed using two methods: direct evaluation of traits through resilience measures, and proxy assessment of resilience, in which related psychological constructs are used to explain resilient outcomes.

There are more than 30 resilience measures that assess over 50 different variables related to resilience, but there is no universally accepted "gold standard" for measuring resilience.

Five of the established self-report measures of psychological resilience are:

Ego Resiliency Scale

measures a person's ability to exercise control over their impulses or inhibition in response to environmental demands, with the aim of maintaining or enhancing their ego equilibrium.

Hardiness Scale

encompasses three main dimensions: (1) commitment (a conviction that life has purpose), (2) control (confidence in one's ability to navigate life), and (3) challenge (aptitude for and pleasure in adapting to change)

Psychological Resilience Scale

assesses a "resilience core" characterized by five traits (purposeful life, perseverance, self-reliance, equanimity, and existential aloneness) that reflect an individual's physical and mental resilience throughout their lifespan

Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale

developed in a clinical treatment setting that conceptualized resilience as arising from four factors: (1) control, commitment, and change hardiness constructs^{[clarification needed]}

Brief Resilience Scale

assesses resilience as the capacity to bounce back from unfavorable circumstances

The Resilience Systems Scales was produced to investigate and measure the underlying structure of the 115 items from these five most-commonly cited trait resilience scales in the literature. Three strong latent factors account for most of the variance accounted for by the five most popular resilience scales, and replicated ecological systems theory:

Engineering resilience

The capability of a system to quickly and effortlessly restore itself to a stable equilibrium state after a disruption, as measured by its speed and ease of recovery.

Ecological resilience

The capacity of a system to endure or resist disruptions while preserving a steady state and adapting to necessary changes in its functioning.

Adaptive capacity

The ability to continuously adjust functions and processes in order to be ready to adapt to any disruption.

'Proxy' measurement

Resilience literature identifies five main trait domains that serve as stress-buffers and can be used as proxies to describe resilience outcomes:

personality

A resilient personality includes positive expressions of the five-factor personality traits such as high emotional stability, extraversion, conscientiousness, openness, and agreeableness.

cognitive abilities and executive functions

Resilience is identified through effective use of executive functions and processing of experiential demands, or through an overarching cognitive mapping system that integrates information from current situations, prior experience, and goal-driven processes.

affective systems, which include emotional regulation systems

Emotion regulation systems are based on the broaden-and-build theory, in which there is a reciprocal relationship between trait resilience and positive emotional functioning through emotional management, coping, and regulation achieved by means of attention control, cognitive reappraisal, and coping strategies^{[clarification needed]}.

eudaimonic well-being

resilience emerges from natural well-being processes (e.g. autonomy, purpose in life, environmental mastery) and underlying genetic and neural substrates and acts as a protective resilient factor across life-span transitions.

health systems

This also reflects the broaden-and-build theory, where there is a reciprocal relationship between trait resilience and positive health functioning through the promotion of feeling capable to deal with adverse health situations.

Mixed model

A mixed model of resilience can be derived from direct and proxy measures of resilience. A search for latent factors among 61 direct and proxy resilience assessments, suggested four main factors:

recovery

Resilience scales that focus on recovery, such as engineering resilience, align with reports of stability in emotional and health systems. The most fitting theoretical framework for this is the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. This theory highlights how positive emotions can foster resilient health systems and enable individuals to recover from setbacks.

sustainability

Resilience scales that reflect "sustainability," such as engineering resilience, align with conscientiousness, lower levels of dysexecutive functioning, and five dimensions of eudaimonic well-being. Theoretically, resilience is the effective use of executive functions and processing of experiential demands (also known as resilient functioning), where an overarching cognitive mapping system integrates information from current situations, prior experience, and goal-driven processes (known as the cognitive model of resilience).

adaptability resilience

Resilience scales that assess adaptability, such as adaptive capacity, are associated with higher levels of extraversion (such as being enthusiastic, talkative, assertive, and gregarious) and openness-to-experience (such as being intellectually curious, creative, and imaginative). These personality factors are often reported to form a higher-order factor known as "beta" or "plasticity", which reflects a drive for growth, agency, and reduced inhibition by preferring new and diverse experiences while reducing fixed patterns of behavior. These findings suggest that adaptability can be seen as a complement to growth, agency, and reduced inhibition.

social cohesion

Several resilience measures converge to suggest an underlying social cohesion factor, in which social support, care, and cohesion among family and friends (as featured in various scales within the literature) form a single latent factor.

These findings point to the possibility of adopting a "mixed model" of resilience in which direct assessments of resilience could be employed alongside cognate psychological measures to improve the evaluation of resilience.

Criticism

As with other psychological phenomena, there is controversy about how resilience should be defined. Its definition affects research focuses; differing or imprecise definitions lead to inconsistent research. Research on resilience has become more heterogeneous in its outcomes and measures, convincing some researchers to abandon the term altogether due to it being attributed to all outcomes of research where results were more positive than expected.

There is also disagreement among researchers as to whether psychological resilience is a character trait or state of being. Psychological resilience has also been referred to as ecological concept, ranging from micro to macro levels of interpretation^{[clarification needed]}.

However, it is generally agreed upon that resilience is a buildable resource. There is also evidence that resilience can indicate a capacity to resist a sharp decline in other harm even though a person temporarily appears to get worse^{[clarification needed]}. Adolescents who have a high level of adaptation (i.e. resilience) tend to struggle with dealing with other psychological problems later on in life. This is due to an overload of their stress response systems. There is evidence that the higher one's resilience is, the lower one's vulnerability.^{[clarification needed]}

Brad Evans and Julian Reid criticize resilience discourse and its rising popularity in their book, Resilient Life. The authors assert that policies of resilience^{[clarification needed]} can put the onus of disaster response on individuals rather than publicly coordinated efforts. Tied to the emergence of neoliberalism, climate change, third-world development, and other discourses, Evans and Reid argue that promoting resilience draws attention away from governmental responsibility and towards self-responsibility and healthy psychological effects such as post-traumatic growth.

See also

• Adaptive performance
• Differential susceptibility hypothesis
• Hardiness (psychology)
• Health realization
• Mental toughness
• Neuroplasticity
• Salutogenesis
• Scale of Protective Factors (SPF)
• Self (psychology)
• Stress management

References

1. • de Terte I, Stephens C (December 2014). "Psychological resilience of workers in high-risk occupations". Stress and Health. 30 (5): 353–355. doi:10.1002/smi.2627. PMID 25476960.
   • "Resilience". American Psychological Association. Retrieved 2023-07-22.
2. Werner EE (1989). Vulnerable but invincible: a longitudinal study of resilient children and youth. New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-937431-03-0.
3. Southwick SM, Bonanno GA, Masten AS, Panter-Brick C, Yehuda R (2014-10-01). "Resilience definitions, theory, and challenges: interdisciplinary perspectives". European Journal of Psychotraumatology. 5 (1): 10.3402/ejpt.v5.25338. doi:10.3402/ejpt.v5.25338. ISSN 2000-8066. PMC 4185134. PMID 25317257.
4. Smith JC, Hyman SM, Andres-Hyman RC, Ruiz JJ, Davidson L (October 2016). "Applying recovery principles to the treatment of trauma". Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 47 (5): 347–355. doi:10.1037/pro0000105. ISSN 1939-1323.
5. Robertson IT, Cooper CL, Sarkar M, Curran T (2015-04-25). "Resilience training in the workplace from 2003 to 2014: A systematic review" (PDF). Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 88 (3): 533–562. doi:10.1111/joop.12120. ISSN 0963-1798.
6. Herrman H, Stewart DE, Diaz-Granados N, Berger EL, Jackson B, Yuen T (May 2011). "What is Resilience?". The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 56 (5): 258–265. doi:10.1177/070674371105600504. ISSN 0706-7437. PMID 21586191. S2CID 62773368.
7. Fletcher D, Sarkar M (2013-01-01). "Psychological Resilience". European Psychologist. 18 (1): 12–23. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000124. ISSN 1016-9040.
8. Tugade, Michele M.; Fredrickson, Barbara L. (February 2004). "Resilient Individuals Use Positive Emotions to Bounce Back From Negative Emotional Experiences". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 86 (2): 320–333. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320. PMC 3132556. PMID 14769087.
9. Pahwa, Sumit; Khan, Nusrat (May 2022). "Factors Affecting Emotional Resilience in Adults". Management and Labour Studies. 47 (2): 216–232. doi:10.1177/0258042X211072935.
10. Bonanno GA (2004). "Loss, Trauma, and Human Resilience: Have We Underestimated the Human Capacity to Thrive After Extremely Aversive Events?". American Psychologist. 59 (1): 20–28. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.1.20. ISSN 1935-990X. PMID 14736317. S2CID 6296189.
11. Hopf SM (2010). "Risk and Resilience in Children Coping with Parental Divorce". Dartmouth Undergraduate Journal of Science. Archived from the original on 2010-07-14.
12. McGonigal K (2016-05-10). The Upside of Stress: Why Stress Is Good for You, and How to Get Good at It. Penguin. ISBN 978-1-101-98293-8.
13. • Germain CB, Glitterman A (1996). The Life Model of Social Work Practice (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 9780231064163.
    • Kemp SP, Whittaker JK, Tracy EM. Person-Environment Practice: The Social Ecology of Interpersonal Helping. Transaction Publishers. pp. 42+. ISBN 978-0-202-36784-2.
14. Richardson GE (March 2002). "The metatheory of resilience and resiliency". Journal of Clinical Psychology. 58 (3): 307–321. doi:10.1002/jclp.10020. PMID 11836712.
15. Pedro-Carroll JA (2005). "Fostering children's resilience in the aftermath of divorce: The role of evidence-based programs for children" (PDF). Family Court Review. 43: 52–64. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2005.00007.x. Retrieved 30 March 2016.
16. • Antonovsky A (1979). Health, Stress, and Coping. Jossey-Bass Publishers. ISBN 978-0-87589-412-6.^{[page needed]}
    • Carr A (2004). Positive Psychology: The Science of Happiness and Human Strengths. Psychology Press. pp. 213+. ISBN 978-1-58391-991-0.
17. Masten AS (1994). "Resilience in individual development: Successful adaptation despite risk and adversity.". In Wang M, Gordon E (eds.). Risk and resilience in inner city America: challenges and prospects. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum. pp. 3–25. ISBN 978-0-8058-1325-8.
18. Zautra AJ, Hall JS, Murray KE (2010). "Resilience: A new definition of health for people and communities.". In Reich JW, Zautra AP, Hall JS (eds.). Handbook of adult resilience. New York: Guilford. pp. 3–34. ISBN 978-1-4625-0647-7.
19. Brooks R, Goldstein S (13 January 2022). "Resilience: A Process and a Mindset–ADD Resource Center". Retrieved 2022-07-05.
20. Aldao, Amelia; Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan; Schweizer, Susanne (March 2010). "Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review". Clinical Psychology Review. 30 (2): 217–237. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.004. PMID 20015584.
21. Luthar, S. S., & Cicchetti, D. (2000). The construct of resilience: implications for interventions and social policies. Development and psychopathology, 12(4), 857–885. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579400004156
22. Morrow, Betty Hearn (2008). "Community resilience: A social justice perspective". doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.1278.9604. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
23. Britt TW, Shen W, Sinclair RR, Grossman MR, Klieger DM (June 2016). "How much do we really know about employee resilience?". Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 9 (2): 378–404. doi:10.1017/iop.2015.107. S2CID 49211847.
24. Fleuren BP, Nübold A, Uitdewilligen S, Verduyn P, Hülsheger UR (January 2023). "Troubles on troubled minds: an intensive longitudinal diary study on the role of burnout in the resilience process following acute stressor exposure". European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 32 (3): 373–388. doi:10.1080/1359432x.2022.2161369. S2CID 255631902.
25. Gavidia-Payne S, Denny B, Davis K, Francis A, Jackson M (2015). "Parental resilience: A neglected construct in resilience research". Clinical Psychologist. 19 (3): 111–121. doi:10.1111/cp.12053.
26. Siebert A (2005). The Resiliency Advantage. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. pp. 74–78. ISBN 978-1-57675-329-3.
27. Dudek KA, Kaufmann FN, Lavoie O, Menard C (January 2021). "Central and peripheral stress-induced epigenetic mechanisms of resilience". Current Opinion in Psychiatry. 34 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1097/YCO.0000000000000664. PMID 33141775. S2CID 226249341.
28. Cabib S, Puglisi-Allegra S (January 2012). "The mesoaccumbens dopamine in coping with stress". Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 36 (1): 79–89. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.04.012. PMID 21565217. S2CID 1614115.
29. Dutcher J. M. (2023). Brain Reward Circuits Promote Stress Resilience and Health: Implications for Reward-Based Interventions. Current directions in psychological science, 32(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221121770
30. Dutcher JM, Creswell JD (December 2018). "The role of brain reward pathways in stress resilience and health". Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 95: 559–567. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.10.014. PMID 30477985. S2CID 53719739.
31. Ozbay F, Fitterling H, Charney D, Southwick S (August 2008). "Social support and resilience to stress across the life span: a neurobiologic framework". Current Psychiatry Reports. 10 (4): 304–310. doi:10.1007/s11920-008-0049-7. PMID 18627668. S2CID 34039857.
32. Russo, Scott J.; Murrough, James W.; Han, Ming-Hu; Charney, Dennis S.; Nestler, Eric J. (14 October 2012). "Neurobiology of resilience". Nature Neuroscience. 15 (11): 1475–1484. doi:10.1038/nn.3234. ISSN 1546-1726. PMC 3580862. PMID 23064380.
33. Garmezy N (1973). "Competence and adaptation in adult schizophrenic patients and children at risk". In Dean SR (ed.). Schizophrenia: The first ten Dean Award Lectures. N.Y.: MSS Information Corp. pp. 163–204.
34. Garmezy N, Streitman S (1974). "Children at risk: the search for the antecedents of schizophrenia. Part I. Conceptual models and research methods". Schizophrenia Bulletin. 1 (8): 14–90. doi:10.1093/schbul/1.8.14. PMID 4619494.
35. Werner EE (1971). The Children of Kauai: A Longitudinal Study from the Prenatal Period to Age Ten. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 978-0-87022-860-5.
36. Masten AS, Best KM, Garmezy N (1990). "Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity". Development and Psychopathology. 2 (4): 425–444. doi:10.1017/S0954579400005812. S2CID 145342630.
37. Masten AS (1989). "Resilience in development: Implications of the study of successful adaptation for developmental psychopathology". In Cicchetti D (ed.). The emergence of a discipline: Rochester symposium on developmental psychopathology. Vol. 1. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum. pp. 261–294. ISBN 978-0-8058-0553-6.
38. Cicchetti D, Rogosch FA (1997). "The role of self-organization in the promotion of resilience in maltreated children". Development and Psychopathology. 9 (4): 797–815. doi:10.1017/S0954579497001442. PMID 9449006. S2CID 29740206.
39. Fredrickson BL, Tugade MM, Waugh CE, Larkin GR (2003). "What good are positive emotions in crises? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 84 (2): 365–376. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.365. PMC 2755263. PMID 12585810.
40. Luthar SS (1999). Poverty and children's adjustment. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage. ISBN 978-0-7619-0518-9.
41. Masten AS, Reed MG (2002). "Resilience in development". In Snyder CR, Lopez SJ (eds.). Handbook of positive psychology. London: Oxford University Press. pp. 74–88. ISBN 978-0-19-803094-2.
42. Derryberry D, Reed MA, Pilkenton-Taylor C (14 November 2003). "Temperament and coping: advantages of an individual differences perspective". Development and Psychopathology. 15 (4): 1049–1066. doi:10.1017/s0954579403000439. PMID 14984137. S2CID 18226488.
43. Tugade, M. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. Journal of personality and social psychology, 86(2), 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320
44. Maltby J, Hall SS (April 2022). "Less is more. Discovering the latent factors of trait resilience". Journal of Research in Personality. 97: 104193. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2022.104193. ISSN 0092-6566.
45. Maltby J, Day L, Hall SS, Chivers S (December 2019). "The Measurement and Role of Ecological Resilience Systems Theory Across Domain-Specific Outcomes: The Domain-Specific Resilient Systems Scales" (PDF). Assessment. 26 (8): 1444–1461. doi:10.1177/1073191117738045. PMID 29083233. S2CID 206657002.
46. Maltby J, Day L, Hall S (2015-07-01). "Refining Trait Resilience: Identifying Engineering, Ecological, and Adaptive Facets from Extant Measures of Resilience". PLOS ONE. 10 (7): e0131826. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1031826M. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131826. PMC 4488934. PMID 26132197.
47. Johnson J, Wood AM, Gooding P, Taylor PJ, Tarrier N (June 2011). "Resilience to suicidality: the buffering hypothesis". Clinical Psychology Review. 31 (4): 563–591. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.12.007. PMID 21276646.
48. Tronick E, DiCorcia JA (June 2015). "The Everyday Stress Resilience Hypothesis: A Reparatory Sensitivity and the Development of Coping and Resilience". Children Australia. 40 (2): 124–138. doi:10.1017/cha.2015.11. ISSN 1035-0772. S2CID 147249680.
49. Määttänen I, Makkonen E, Jokela M, Närväinen J, Väliaho J, Seppälä V, Kylmälä J, Henttonen P (2021). "Evidence for a Behaviourally Measurable Perseverance Trait in Humans". Behavioral Sciences. 11 (9): 123. doi:10.3390/bs11090123. PMC 8468401. PMID 34562961.
50. Kamalpour M, Watson J, Buys L (2020). "How can online communities support resilience factors among older adults". International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 36 (14): 1342–1353. doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1749817. S2CID 216158876.
51. Sarkar M, Fletcher D (2014). "Ordinary magic, extraordinary performance: Psychological resilience and thriving in high achievers" (PDF). Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology. 3: 46–60. doi:10.1037/spy0000003.
52. "Building your resilience". American Psychological Association. 2020.
53. Rutter M (2008). "Developing concepts in developmental psychopathology". In Hudziak JJ (ed.). Developmental psychopathology and wellness: Genetic and environmental influences. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Publishing. pp. 3–22. ISBN 978-1-58562-279-5.
54. Masten AS (March 2001). "Ordinary magic. Resilience processes in development". The American Psychologist. 56 (3): 227–238. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.227. PMID 11315249. S2CID 19940228.
55. Fredrickson BL, Branigan C (May 2005). "Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires". Cognition & Emotion. 19 (3): 313–332. doi:10.1080/02699930441000238. PMC 3156609. PMID 21852891.
56. Fredrickson BL (March 2001). "The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions". The American Psychologist. 56 (3): 218–226. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.56.3.218. PMC 3122271. PMID 11315248.
57. Tugade MM, Fredrickson BL (February 2004). "Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 86 (2): 320–333. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320. PMC 3132556. PMID 14769087.
58. Ong AD, Bergeman CS, Bisconti TL, Wallace KA (October 2006). "Psychological resilience, positive emotions, and successful adaptation to stress in later life". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 91 (4): 730–749. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.730. PMID 17014296. S2CID 3080937.
59. Luther K (2015). "Examining Social Support Among Adult Children of Incarcerated Parents". Family Relations. 64 (4): 505–518. doi:10.1111/fare.12134.
60. • Mahony DL, Burroughs WJ, Lippman LG (March 2002). "Perceived attributes of health-promoting laughter: a cross-generational comparison". The Journal of Psychology. 136 (2): 171–181. doi:10.1080/00223980209604148. PMID 12081092. S2CID 41596525.
    • Dillon KM, Minchoff B, Baker KH (1985). "Positive emotional states and enhancement of the immune system". International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine. 15 (1): 13–18. doi:10.2190/R7FD-URN9-PQ7F-A6J7. PMID 4055243. S2CID 1308205.
61. The REGAIN (Regional versus General Anesthesia for Promoting Independence after Hip Fracture) Investigators (2023-09-12). "Preoperative psychological resilience and recovery after hip fracture: Secondary analysis of the REGAIN randomized trial". Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 71 (12): 3792–3801. doi:10.1111/jgs.18552. ISSN 0002-8614. PMID 37698304.
62. • Theron L, van Rensburg A (August 2018). "Resilience over time: Learning from school-attending adolescents living in conditions of structural inequality". Journal of Adolescence. 67: 167–178. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.06.012. PMID 29980070. S2CID 49715217.
    • Gagnon AJ, Stewart DE (August 2014). "Resilience in international migrant women following violence associated with pregnancy". Archives of Women's Mental Health. 17 (4): 303–310. doi:10.1007/s00737-013-0392-5. PMID 24221406. S2CID 22177086.
63. Abraham R, Lien L, Hanssen I (June 2018). "Coping, resilience and posttraumatic growth among Eritrean female refugees living in Norwegian asylum reception centres: A qualitative study". The International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 64 (4): 359–366. doi:10.1177/0020764018765237. hdl:10852/95636. PMID 29584520. S2CID 4377728.
64. Lin N, Woelfel MW, Light SC (September 1985). "The buffering effect of social support subsequent to an important life event". Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 26 (3): 247–263. doi:10.2307/2136756. JSTOR 2136756. PMID 4067240.
65. Pearlin LI, Lieberman MA, Menaghan EG, Mullan JT (December 1981). "The stress process". Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 22 (4): 337–356. doi:10.2307/2136676. JSTOR 2136676. PMID 7320473. S2CID 5162220.
66. Combat and Operational Stress Control Manual for Leaders and Soldiers, Field Manual, vol. 6-22.5, Washington, D.C.: Department of the Army, 2009, p. 32
67. Rakesh G, Clausen AN, Buckley MN, Clarke-Rubright E, Fairbank JA, Wagner HR, Morey RA (2022). "The role of trauma, social support, and demography on veteran resilience". European Journal of Psychotraumatology. 13 (1): 2058267. doi:10.1080/20008198.2022.2058267. PMC 9116243. PMID 35599980.
68. Robertson D (2012). Build Your Resilience. London: Hodder. ISBN 978-1-4441-6871-6.
69. Brunwasser SM, Gillham JE, Kim ES (December 2009). "A meta-analytic review of the Penn Resiliency Program's effect on depressive symptoms". Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 77 (6): 1042–1054. doi:10.1037/a0017671. PMC 4667774. PMID 19968381.
70. Padesky CA, Mooney KA (2012-06-01). "Strengths-based cognitive-behavioural therapy: a four-step model to build resilience". Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 19 (4): 283–290. doi:10.1002/cpp.1795. PMID 22653834.
71. Bergman MM (24 January 2019). "Why people in the US south stay put in the face of climate change". The Guardian. Retrieved 3 February 2019.
72. Capstick T, Delaney M (2016). "Language for Resilience: The Role of Language in Enhancing the Resilience of Syrian Refugees and Host Communities, with a foreword by the UNHCR" (PDF). British Council. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-11-06.
73. Nguyen K, Stanley N, Stanley L, Wang Y (2015). "Resilience in Language Learners and the Relationship to Storytelling". Cogent Education. 2: 991160. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2014.991160.
74. Werner EE (1997). "The Value of Applied Research for Head Start: Perspective a Cross-Cultural and Longitudinal". NHSA Research Quarterly. 1: 15–24. doi:10.1207/s19309325nhsa0101_2.
75. • "Abecedarian Project (High-quality child care/preschool for children from disadvantaged backgrounds)". evidencebasedprograms.org. Archived from the original on March 12, 2005.
    • "The Carolina Abecedarian Project". Fpg.unc.edu. 2007-05-22. Archived from the original on 2010-08-28. Retrieved 2010-09-16.
76. Sinclair MF, Christenson SL, Thurlow ML (2005). "Promoting School Completion of Urban Secondary Youth With Emotional or Behavioral Disabilities" (PDF). Exceptional Children. 71 (4): 465–482. doi:10.1177/001440290507100405. S2CID 143147646. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-04.
77. Ray M (2020-06-18). "PBIS in Trauma-Informed Resilience-Focused Schools". Starr Commonwealth. Retrieved 2020-12-07.
78. Gibson C (August 1, 2011). "Teens Affected By Terrorism United to Promote Peace". The Washington Post. Retrieved 21 June 2012.
79. Robson S, Manacapilli T (2014), Enhancing Performance Under Stress: Stress Inoculation Training for Battlefield Airmen (PDF), Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Corporation, ISBN 978-0-8330-7844-5
80. Werner EE (1995). "Resilience in development". Current Directions in Psychological Science. 4 (3): 81–85. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772327. S2CID 143879633.
81. Ruch W, Proyer RT, Weber M (February 2010). "Humor as a character strength among the elderly: empirical findings on age-related changes and its contribution to satisfaction with life" (PDF). Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie. 43 (1): 13–18. doi:10.1007/s00391-009-0090-0. PMID 20012063. S2CID 25341461.
82. Cicchetti D, Rogosch FA, Lynch M, Holt KD (1993). "Resilience in maltreated children: Processes leading to adaptive outcome". Development and Psychopathology. 5 (4): 629–647. doi:10.1017/S0954579400006209. S2CID 145698486.
83. Block JH, Block J (1980). "The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the organisation of behaviour". In Collins WA (ed.). Development of cognition, affect, and social relations: Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology. Vol. 13. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum. ISBN 978-0-89859-023-4.
84. Bonanno GA, Galea S, Bucciarelli A, Vlahov D (October 2007). "What predicts psychological resilience after disaster? The role of demographics, resources, and life stress". Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 75 (5): 671–682. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.75.5.671. hdl:2027.42/56241. PMID 17907849.
85. Hood R, Hill P, Spilka B (2009). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (4th ed.). New York: The Guilford Press. ISBN 978-1-60623-392-4.
86. Peres JF, Moreira-Almeida A, Nasello AG, Koenig HG (2007). "Spirituality and resilience in trauma victims". Journal of Religion & Health. 46 (3): 343–350. doi:10.1007/s10943-006-9103-0. S2CID 10875524.
87. Steenkamp, Maria M.; Nash, William P.; Litz, Brett T. (May 2013). "Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder". American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 44 (5): 507–512. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.01.013.
88. Steenkamp, Maria M.; Nash, William P.; Litz, Brett T. (May 2013). "Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder". American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 44 (5): 507–512. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.01.013.
89. Mohammadi N, Afshar H (2016). "The role of interpersonal forgiveness in resilience and severity of pain in chronic pain patients". Fundamentals of Mental Health. 18 (4): 212–219. Retrieved 2020-02-13.
90. O’Beirne, Sheena; Katsimigos, Anna-Maria; Harmon, Dominic (November 2020). "Forgiveness and chronic pain: a systematic review". Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -). 189 (4): 1359–1364. doi:10.1007/s11845-020-02200-y. PMID 32125628.
91. O’Beirne, Sheena; Katsimigos, Anna-Maria; Harmon, Dominic (November 2020). "Forgiveness and chronic pain: a systematic review". Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -). 189 (4): 1359–1364. doi:10.1007/s11845-020-02200-y. PMID 32125628.
92. Chua LW, Milfont TL, Jose PE (November 2015). "Coping Skills Help Explain How Future-Oriented Adolescents Accrue Greater Well-Being Over Time". Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 44 (11): 2028–2041. doi:10.1007/s10964-014-0230-8. PMID 25427783. S2CID 28229478.
93. Yates TM, Egeland B, Sroufe LA (2003). "Rethinking resilience: A developmental process perspective". In Luthar SS (ed.). Resilience and vulnerability: Adaptation in the context of childhood adversities. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 234–256. ISBN 978-0-521-00161-8.
94. Shastri PC (July 2013). "Resilience: Building immunity in psychiatry". Indian Journal of Psychiatry. 55 (3): 224–234. doi:10.4103/0019-5545.117134. PMC 3777343. PMID 24082242.
95. Min JA, Yu JJ, Lee CU, Chae JH (November 2013). "Cognitive emotion regulation strategies contributing to resilience in patients with depression and/or anxiety disorders". Comprehensive Psychiatry. 54 (8): 1190–1197. doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.05.008. PMID 23806709.
96. Elm JH, Lewis JP, Walters KL, Self JM (June 2016). "'I'm in this world for a reason': Resilience and recovery among American Indian and Alaska Native two-spirit women". Journal of Lesbian Studies. 20 (3–4): 352–371. doi:10.1080/10894160.2016.1152813. PMC 6424359. PMID 27254761.
97. American Psychological Association (2014). "The Road to Resilience" (PDF). Washington, D.C.: unc.edu. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-12-22. Retrieved 2010-09-16.
98. Kilpatrick DG, Resnick HS, Milanak ME, Miller MW, Keyes KM, Friedman MJ (October 2013). "National estimates of exposure to traumatic events and PTSD prevalence using DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria". Journal of Traumatic Stress. 26 (5): 537–547. doi:10.1002/jts.21848. PMC 4096796. PMID 24151000.
99. Tranter H, Brooks M, Khan R (February 2021). "Emotional resilience and event centrality mediate posttraumatic growth following adverse childhood experiences" (PDF). Psychological Trauma. 13 (2): 165–173. doi:10.1037/tra0000953. PMID 32881570. S2CID 221497147.
100. Wolin SJ, Wolin S (2010). The Resilient Self: How Survivors of Troubled Families Rise Above Adversity. Random House Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-307-75687-9.
101. Luthar SS (2006). "Resilience in development: A synthesis of research across five decades". In Cicchetti D, Cohen DJ (eds.). Developmental Psychopathology. Vol. 3rd: Risk, Disorder, and Adaptation (2nd ed.). Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley and Sons. pp. 739–795.
102. Masten A (2013). Inside resilient children. YouTube. PopTech. Archived from the original on 2019-02-12. Retrieved 18 April 2019.{{cite AV media}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
103. Buhs ES, Rudasill KM (2016). "Review of ordinary magic: resilience in development by Ann S. Masten". Educational Psychology Papers and Publications. 46: 84–85. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2016.05.001. Retrieved 18 April 2019.
104. Wingo, Aliza P.; Fani, Negar; Bradley, Bekh; Ressler, Kerry J. (2010-02-23). "Psychological resilience and neurocognitive performance in a traumatized community sample". Depression and Anxiety. 27 (8): 768–774. doi:10.1002/da.20675. ISSN 1091-4269. PMC 2918658. PMID 20186970.
105. Bunt, Stephen C.; Meredith-Duliba, Tawny; Didehhani, Nyaz; Hynan, Linda S.; LoBue, Christian; Stokes, Mathew; Miller, Shane M.; Bell, Kathleen; Batjer, Hunt; Cullum, C. Munro (2021-08-09). "Resilience and recovery from sports related concussion in adolescents and young adults". Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 43 (7): 677–688. doi:10.1080/13803395.2021.1990214. ISSN 1380-3395. PMID 34720048. S2CID 240355953.
106. Wang M, Haertel G, Walberg H (1994). Educational Resilience in Inner Cities. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
107. Benard B (1991). Drug-Free Schools & Communities: Fostering resiliency in kids: Protective factors in the family, school and community. Portland, Ore.: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
108. Cauce AM, Stewart A, Rodriguez MD, Cochran B, Ginzler J (2003). "Overcoming the Odds? Adolescent Development in the Context of Urban Poverty". In Luthar SS (ed.). Resilience and Vulnerability: Adaptation in the Context of Childhood Adversities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 343–391. ISBN 978-0-521-00161-8.
109. Doob CB (2013). Social Inequality and Social Stratification in US Society. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Education Inc.
110. Garmezy N (1974), "The study of children at risk: New perspectives for developmental psychopathology", 82nd Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans, La.
111. Gonzalez R, Padilla A (1997). "The Academic Resilience of Mexican–American High School Students". Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 19 (3): 301–317. doi:10.1177/07399863970193004. S2CID 143642546.
112. Grasso, Damion (8 May 2021). "Harnessing cultural identity as a protective factor in minority mental health: Applications to children and families | Society of Clinical Psychology". Retrieved 15 December 2024.
113. Ungar, M. (8 November 2006). "Resilience across Cultures". British Journal of Social Work. 38 (2): 218–235. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcl343.
114. Scarf, Damian; Moradi, Saleh; McGaw, Kate; Hewitt, Joshua; Hayhurst, Jillian G.; Boyes, Mike; Ruffman, Ted; Hunter, John A. (September 2016). "Somewhere I belong: Long-term increases in adolescents' resilience are predicted by perceived belonging to the in-group". British Journal of Social Psychology. 55 (3): 588–599. doi:10.1111/bjso.12151. PMID 27448617.
115. Allen, Kelly-Ann; Kern, Margaret L.; Rozek, Christopher S.; McInerney, Dennis M.; Slavich, George M. (2 January 2021). "Belonging: a review of conceptual issues, an integrative framework, and directions for future research". Australian Journal of Psychology. 73 (1): 87–102. doi:10.1080/00049530.2021.1883409. PMC 8095671. PMID 33958811.
116. Garmezy N (1991). "Resiliency and vulnerability to adverse developmental outcomes associated with poverty". American Behavioral Scientist. 34 (4): 416–430. doi:10.1177/0002764291034004003. S2CID 143628559.
117. Howard A. "Emotional Adjustment of Moving for Young Kids". Moveboxer. Archived from the original on 2012-12-29.
118. McLeod, Christine; Heriot, Sandra; Hunt, Caroline (August 2008). "Changing Places: Resilience in Children Who Move". Australian Journal of Education. 52 (2): 168–182. doi:10.1177/000494410805200205.
119. Copeland, William; Halvorson-Phelan, Julia (9 November 2023). "Adult Mental Health, Substance Use Disorders, and Functional Outcomes of Children Resilient to Early Adversity". American Journal of Psychiatry. 180 (12): 906–913. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.20230038. PMC 11708488. PMID 37941330. Retrieved 3 December 2023.
120. Kelly JB, Emery RE (2003). "Children's Adjustment Following Divorce: Risk and Resilience Perspectives". Family Relations. 52 (4): 352–362. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2003.00352.x.
121. Pedro-Carroll J (2005). "Fostering children's resilience in the aftermath of divorce: The told of evidence based programs for children" (PDF). Family Court Review. 43: 52–64. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2005.00007.x.
122. Monroy Cortés BF, Palacios Cruz L (2011). "Resiliencia: ¿Es posible medirla e influir en ella?". Salud Mental (in Mexican Spanish). 34 (3). México: Instituto Nacional de Psiquiátrica Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz: 237–246.
123. Sapouna M, Wolke D (November 2013). "Resilience to bullying victimization: the role of individual, family and peer characteristics". Child Abuse & Neglect. 37 (11): 997–1006. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.05.009. PMID 23809169.
124. Schneider TR, Lyons JB, Khazon S (2013). "Emotional intelligence and resilience". Personality and Individual Differences. 55 (8): 909–914. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.07.460.
125. Polan J, Sieving R, Pettingell S, Bearinger L, McMorris B (2012). "142. Relationships Between Adolescent Girls' Social-Emotional Intelligence and Their Involvement in Relational Aggression and Physical Fighting". Journal of Adolescent Health. 50 (2): S81 – S82. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.10.216.
126. Frankenberg E, Sikoki B, Sumantri C, Suriastini W, Thomas D (2013). "Education, Vulnerability, and Resilience after a Natural Disaster". Ecology and Society. 18 (2): 16. doi:10.5751/ES-05377-180216. PMC 4144011. PMID 25170339.
127. "Building Resilience to Natural Disasters and Major Economic Crises" (PDF). Un Escap. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-04-22.
128. "Building Resilience to Natural Disasters". The World Economic Forum. Archived from the original on April 21, 2014.
129. Kieft J, Bendell J (2021). The responsibility of communicating difficult truths about climate influenced societal disruption and collapse: an introduction to psychological research. Institute for Leadership and Sustainability (IFLAS) Occasional Papers (Report). Vol. 7. Ambleside, UK: University of Cumbria.
130. Rynearson EK, ed. (2006). Violent Death: Resilience and Intervention Beyond the Crisis. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-135-92633-5.
131. Bonanno GA (January 2004). "Loss, trauma, and human resilience: have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events?". The American Psychologist. 59 (1): 20–28. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20. PMID 14736317. S2CID 6296189.
132. Human B, Greeff AP (2004). "Resilience in families in which a parent has died" (PDF). The American Journal of Family Therapy. 32: 27–42. doi:10.1080/01926180490255765. hdl:10019.1/52434. S2CID 145540587.
133. Cooley E, Toray T, Roscoe L (2010). "Reactions to Loss Scale: assessing grief in college students". Omega. 61 (1): 25–51. doi:10.2190/OM.61.1.b. PMID 20533647. S2CID 31782621.
134. Heath MA, Donald DR, Theron LC, Lyon RC (2014). "Therapeutic Interventions to Strengthen Resilience in Vulnerable Children". School Psychology International. 35 (3): 309–337. doi:10.1177/0143034314529912. S2CID 57392624.
135. Linnenluecke MK (2017). "Resilience in Business and Management Research: A Review of Influential Publications and a Research Agenda: Resilience in Business and Management Research". International Journal of Management Reviews. 19 (1): 4–30. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12076. S2CID 145078741.
136. Hartmann S, Weiss M, Newman A, Hoegl M (2019-02-27). "Resilience in the Workplace:A Multilevel Review and Synthesis". Applied Psychology. 69 (3): 913–959. doi:10.1111/apps.12191. S2CID 151262829.
137. Luthans, F. (2002). "The need for and meaning of positive organization behavior". Journal of Organizational Behavior. 23 (6): 695–706. doi:10.1002/job.165. S2CID 45140677.
138. • Vegt GS, Essens P, Wahlström M, George G (2015). "Managing Risk and Resilience". Academy of Management Journal. 58 (4): 971–980. doi:10.5465/amj.2015.4004. ISSN 0001-4273.
     • King DD, Newman A, Luthans F (2016). "Not if, but when we need resilience in the workplace: Workplace Resilience". Journal of Organizational Behavior. 37 (5): 782–786. doi:10.1002/job.2063.
139. • Van de Ven AH, Polley D (1992). "Learning While Innovating". Organization Science. 3 (1): 92–116. doi:10.1287/orsc.3.1.92. ISSN 1047-7039.
     • Shepherd DA, Cardon MS (2009). "Negative Emotional Reactions to Project Failure and the Self-Compassion to Learn from the Experience". Journal of Management Studies. 46 (6): 923–949. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00821.x. S2CID 9341007.
140. Hu Y, McNamara P, Piaskowska D (2016). "Project Suspensions and Failures in New Product Development: Returns for Entrepreneurial Firms in Co-Development Alliances" (PDF). Journal of Product Innovation Management. 34 (1): 35–59. doi:10.1111/jpim.12322. S2CID 54934364.
141. Moenkemeyer G, Hoegl M, Weiss M (2012). "Innovator resilience potential: A process perspective of individual resilience as influenced by innovation project termination" (PDF). Human Relations. 65 (5): 627–655. doi:10.1177/0018726711431350. ISSN 0018-7267. S2CID 145054433.
142. Bandura A (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
143. Todt G, Weiss M, Hoegl M (2018). "Mitigating Negative Side Effects of Innovation Project Terminations: The Role of Resilience and Social Support". Journal of Product Innovation Management. 35 (4): 518–542. doi:10.1111/jpim.12426.
144. • Boyden J, Mann G (2005). "Children's risk, resilience, and coping in extreme situations". In Ungar M (ed.). Handbook for working with children and youth: Pathways to resilience across cultures and contexts. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage. pp. 3–26. ISBN 978-1-4129-0405-6.
     • Castro FG, Murray KE (2010). "Cultural adaptation and resilience: Controversies, issues, and emerging models". In Reich JW, Zautra AJ, Hall JS (eds.). Handbook of adult resilience. New York: Guilford Press. pp. 375–403. ISBN 978-1-4625-0647-7.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
     • Dawes A, Donald D (2000). "Improving children's chances: Developmental theory and effective interventions in community contexts". In Donald D, Dawes A, Louw J (eds.). Addressing childhood adversity. Cape Town, S.A.: David Philip. pp. 1–25. ISBN 978-0-86486-449-9.
145. Task Force on Resilience and Strength in Black Children and Adolescents (2008). Resilience in African American children and adolescents: A vision for optimal development (Report). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. ^{[page needed]}
146. Sutton J (3 January 2019). "What is Resilience and Why is it Important to Bounce Back?". PositivePsychology. Retrieved 3 February 2019.
147. "Building resilience in Aboriginal communities". Anisnabe Kekendazone Network Environment for Aboriginal Health Research. Archived from the original on 2012-04-26.
148. Ungar M (2004). Nurturing hidden resilience in troubled youth. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. ISBN 978-0-8020-8565-8. ^{[page needed]}
149. Obradović J, Bush NR, Stamperdahl J, Adler NE, Boyce WT (2010). "Biological sensitivity to context: the interactive effects of stress reactivity and family adversity on socioemotional behavior and school readiness". Child Development. 81 (1): 270–289. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01394.x. PMC 2846098. PMID 20331667.
150. Ma et al. 2004
151. • Withey SB (1962). "Reaction to uncertain threat". Man and Society in Disaster: 93–123.
     • Wachtel PL (1968). "Anxiety, Attention, and Coping with Threat". Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 73 (2): 137–143. doi:10.1037/h0020118. PMID 5649171.
152. Mauch C, Pfister C (2004), {{citation}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
153. Kayser K, Wind L, Shankar RA (2008). "Disaster Relief Within a Collectivistic Context". Journal of Social Service Research. 34 (3): 87–98. doi:10.1080/01488370802086526. S2CID 143220837.
154. McAuliffe BJ, Jetten J, Hornsey MJ, Hogg MA (2003). "Individualist and collectivist norms: When it's ok to go your own way". European Journal of Social Psychology. 33: 57–70. doi:10.1002/ejsp.129.
155. Grotberg E (1997). A Charge Against Society: The Child's Right to Protection. London and Bristol. p. 26.
156. Henttonen P, Määttänen I, Makkonen E, Honka A, Seppälä V, Närväinen J, García-Velázquez R, Airaksinen J, Jokela M, Lahti EE (2022-11-01). "A measure for assessment of beneficial and harmful fortitude: development and initial validation of the Sisu Scale". Heliyon. 8 (11): e11483. Bibcode:2022Heliy...811483H. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11483. ISSN 2405-8440. PMC 9667267. PMID 36406727.
157. "10 of the best words in the world (that don't translate into English)". The Guardian. 2018-07-27. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2019-04-18.
158. Pangallo A, Zibarras L, Lewis R, Flaxman P (March 2015). "Resilience through the lens of interactionism: a systematic review" (PDF). Psychological Assessment. 27 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1037/pas0000024. PMID 25222438. S2CID 12582767.
159. Windle G, Bennett KM, Noyes J (February 2011). "A methodological review of resilience measurement scales". Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 9 (1): 8. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-9-8. PMC 3042897. PMID 21294858.
160. Block J, Kremen AM (February 1996). "IQ and ego-resiliency: conceptual and empirical connections and separateness". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 70 (2): 349–361. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.349. PMID 8636887.
161. Bartone PT, Ursano MD, Wright KM, Ingraham LH (1989). "The impact of a military EEA disaster on the health of assistance workers" (PDF). Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 177 (6): 317–328. doi:10.1097/00005053-198906000-00001. PMID 2723619. S2CID 25271993.
162. Wagnild G (August 2009). "A review of the Resilience Scale". Journal of Nursing Measurement. 17 (2): 105–113. doi:10.1891/1061-3749.17.2.105. PMID 19711709. S2CID 20778519.
163. Connor KM, Davidson JR (September 2003). "Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)". Depression and Anxiety. 18 (2): 76–82. doi:10.1002/da.10113. PMID 12964174. S2CID 14347861.
164. Smith BW, Dalen J, Wiggins K, Tooley E, Christopher P, Bernard J (2008-09-01). "The brief resilience scale: assessing the ability to bounce back". International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 15 (3): 194–200. doi:10.1080/10705500802222972. PMID 18696313. S2CID 1192402.
165. Maltby J, Day L, Flowe HD, Vostanis P, Chivers S (2019-01-02). "Psychological Trait Resilience Within Ecological Systems Theory: The Resilient Systems Scales" (PDF). Journal of Personality Assessment. 101 (1): 44–53. doi:10.1080/00223891.2017.1344985. PMID 28708004. S2CID 45164978.
166. Holling CS (September 1973). "Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems" (PDF). Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 4 (1): 1–23. Bibcode:1973AnRES...4....1H. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245. ISSN 0066-4162. S2CID 53309505.
167. Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B (August 2002). "Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations". Ambio. 31 (5): 437–440. Bibcode:2002Ambio..31..437F. doi:10.1579/0044-7447-31.5.437. PMID 12374053. S2CID 1940666.
168. • Asendorpf JB, van Aken MA (October 1999). "Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled personality prototypes in childhood: replicability, predictive power, and the trait-type issue". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 77 (4): 815–832. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.815. PMID 10531673.
     • Robins RW, John OP, Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Stouthamer-Loeber M (January 1996). "Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled boys: three replicable personality types". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 70 (1): 157–171. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.157. PMID 8558407.
169. Cicchetti D, Curtis WJ (2015-09-06). "The Developing Brain and Neural Plasticity: Implications for Normality, Psychopathology, and Resilience". Developmental Psychopathology. Hoboken, N.J., USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 1–64. doi:10.1002/9780470939390.ch1. ISBN 978-0-470-93939-0.
170. Parsons S, Kruijt AW, Fox E (November 2016). "A Cognitive Model of Psychological Resilience". Journal of Experimental Psychopathology. 7 (3): 296–310. doi:10.5127/jep.053415. ISSN 2043-8087. S2CID 148059000.
171. • Kay SA (June 2016). "Emotion Regulation and Resilience: Overlooked Connections". Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 9 (2): 411–415. doi:10.1017/iop.2016.31. ISSN 1754-9426. S2CID 147980270.
     • Troy AS, Mauss IB (2011-08-18), Southwick SM, Litz BT, Charney D, Friedman MJ (eds.), "Resilience in the face of stress: emotion regulation as a protective factor", Resilience and Mental Health (1 ed.), Cambridge University Press, pp. 30–44, doi:10.1017/cbo9780511994791.004, ISBN 978-0-521-89839-3, retrieved 2023-04-22
172. Ryff CD (2014). "Psychological well-being revisited: advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia". Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. 83 (1): 10–28. doi:10.1159/000353263. PMC 4241300. PMID 24281296.
173. Rossouw JG, Rossouw PJ, Paynter C, Ward A, Khnana P (2017). "Predictive 6 Factor Resilience Scale – Domains of Resilience and Their Role as Enablers of Job Satisfaction". International Journal of Neuropsychotherapy. 5 (1): 25–40. doi:10.12744/ijnpt.2017.1.0025-0040. ISSN 2202-7653.
174. Digman JM (December 1997). "Higher-order factors of the Big Five". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 73 (6): 1246–1256. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1246. PMID 9418278.
175. DeYoung CG, Peterson JB, Higgins DM (September 2002). "Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health?". Personality and Individual Differences. 33 (4): 533–552. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00171-4. ISSN 0191-8869.
176. Burt KB, Paysnick AA (May 2012). "Resilience in the transition to adulthood". Development and Psychopathology. 24 (2): 493–505. doi:10.1017/S0954579412000119. PMID 22559126. S2CID 13638544.
177. Ye ZJ, Zhang Z, Zhang XY, Tang Y, Chen P, Liang MZ, et al. (February 2020). "State or trait? Measuring resilience by generalisability theory in breast cancer". European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 46: 101727. doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101727. PMID 32339909. S2CID 213249920.
178. Nuttman-Shwartz O, Green O (2021). "Resilience truths: Trauma resilience workers' points of view toward resilience in continuous traumatic situations". International Journal of Stress Management. 28 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1037/str0000223. ISSN 1573-3424. S2CID 234034157.
179. • Ungar M (2004). "A constructionist discourse on resilience: Multiple contexts, multiple realities among at-risk children and youth". Youth & Society. 35 (3): 341–365. doi:10.1177/0044118X03257030. S2CID 145514574.
     • Werner EE, Smith RS (2001). Journeys from childhood to midlife: Risk, resiliency, and recovery. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0-8014-8738-5. ^{[page needed]}
180. Young J (2021-08-10). "Dark Side to Light". Leadership Resilience in a Digital Age. London: Routledge. pp. 107–124. doi:10.4324/9780367280970-9 (inactive 15 December 2024). ISBN 978-0-367-28097-0. S2CID 238719370.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of December 2024 (link)
181. Evans B, Reid J (2014). Resilient Life: The Art of Living Dangerously. Malden, Mass.: Polity Press. ISBN 978-0-7456-7152-9.^{[page needed]}

Further reading

• Benard B (2004). Resiliency: What we have learned. San Francisco: WestEd.
• Bronfenbrenner U (1979). Ecology of human development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
• Comoretto A, Crichton N, Albery IP (2011). Resilience in humanitarian aid workers: understanding processes of development. LAP: Lambert Academic Publishing.
• Gonzales L (2012). Surviving Survival: The Art and Science of Resilience. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
• Marcellino WM, Tortorello F (2014). "I Don't Think I Would Have Recovered". Armed Forces & Society. 41 (3): 496–518. doi:10.1177/0095327X14536709. S2CID 146845944.
• Masten AS (2007). "Resilience in developing systems: progress and promise as the fourth wave rises". Development and Psychopathology. 19 (3): 921–930. doi:10.1017/S0954579407000442. PMID 17705908. S2CID 31526466.
• Masten AS (1999). "Resilience comes of age: Reflections on the past and outlook for the next generation of research". In Glantz MD, Johnson JL (eds.). Resilience and development: Positive life adaptations. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press. pp. 281–296.
• Reivich K, Shatte A (2002). The Resilience Factor: 7 Keys to Finding Your Inner Strength and Overcoming Life's Hurdles. New York: Broadway.
• Rutter M (July 1987). "Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms". The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 57 (3): 316–331. doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.1987.tb03541.x. PMID 3303954.
• Rutter M (2000). "Resilience reconsidered: Conceptual considerations, empirical findings, and policy implications". In Shonkoff JP, Meisels SJ (eds.). Handbook of early childhood intervention (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 651–682.
• Southwick SM, Charnie DA (2018). Resilience: The Science of Mastering Life's Greatest Challenges (Second ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-108-44166-7.
• Ungar M (2007). "Contextual and cultural aspects of resilience in child welfare settings". In Brown I, Chaze F, Fuchs D, Lafrance J, McKay S, Prokop TS (eds.). Putting a human face on child welfare'. Toronto: Centre of Excellence for Child Welfare. pp. 1–24.

External links

Wikiversity has learning resources about Psychological resilience

• National Resilience Resource Center
• Research on resilience at Dalhousie University