Austria-Hungary, also referred to as the Austro-Hungarian Empire, the Dual Monarchy or the Habsburg Monarchy, was a multi-national constitutional monarchy in Central Europe between 1867 and 1918. A military and diplomatic alliance, it consisted of two sovereign states with a single monarch who was titled both Emperor of Austria and King of Hungary. Austria-Hungary constituted the last phase in the constitutional evolution of the Habsburg monarchy: it was formed with the Austro-Hungarian Compromise of 1867 in the aftermath of the Austro-Prussian War, following wars of independence by Hungary in opposition to Habsburg rule. It was dissolved shortly after Hungary terminated the union with Austria in 1918.
Austro-Hungarian Monarchy | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1867–1918 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Coat of arms (1915–1918) (see also: Flags of Austria-Hungary) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Motto: Indivisibiliter ac inseparabiliter (Latin for 'Indivisibly and inseparably') | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Anthem: Gott erhalte, Gott beschütze (English: God preserve, God protect) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  Cisleithania, or "Austria" Lands of the Crown of Saint Stephen, or "Hungary" Condominium of Bosnia-Herzegovina | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Capital |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Largest city | Vienna | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Official languages |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common languages | German, Hungarian, Croatian, Czech, Polish, Ruthenian, Romanian, Bosnian, Serbian, Slovak, Slovene, Italian, Romani (Carpathian), Yiddish, and others (Friulian, Istro-Romanian, Istriot, Ladin) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Religion (1910) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Demonym(s) | Austro-Hungarian | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Government | Constitutional monarchy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Emperor-King (Emperor of Austria/King of Hungary) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• 1867–1916 | Franz Joseph I | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• 1916–1918 | Karl I & IV | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Minister-President of Austria | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• 1867 (first) | F. F. von Beust | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• 1918 (last) | Heinrich Lammasch | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Prime Minister of Hungary | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• 1867–1871 (first) | Gyula Andrássy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• 1918 (last) | Mihály Károlyi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Legislature | Two national legislatures | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• Imperial Council |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• Diet of Hungary |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Historical era |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• 1867 Compromise | 30 March 1867 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• Dual Alliance | 7 October 1879 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• Bosnian Crisis | 6 October 1908 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• July Crisis | 28 June 1914 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• Invasion of Serbia | 28 July 1914 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• Empire dissolved | 31 October 1918 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• Austrian Republic | 12 November 1918 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• Hungarian Republic | 16 November 1918 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• Treaty of Saint-Germain | 10 September 1919 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 June 1920 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Area | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1905 | 621,538 km2 (239,977 sq mi) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Population | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• 1910 estimate | 51,390,223 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Currency |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One of Europe's major powers, Austria-Hungary was geographically the second-largest country in Europe and the third-most populous (after Russia and the German Empire), while being among the ten most populous countries worldwide. The Empire built up the fourth-largest machine-building industry in the world. With the exception of the territory of the Bosnian Condominium, the Empire of Austria and the Kingdom of Hungary were separate sovereign countries in international law.
At its core was the dual monarchy, which was a real union between Cisleithania, the northern and western parts of the former Austrian Empire, and Transleithania (Kingdom of Hungary). Following the 1867 reforms, the Austrian and Hungarian states were co-equal in power. The two countries conducted unified diplomatic and defence policies. For these purposes, "common" ministries of foreign affairs and defence were maintained under the monarch's direct authority, as was a third finance ministry responsible only for financing the two "common" portfolios. A third component of the union was the Kingdom of Croatia-Slavonia, an autonomous region under the Hungarian crown, which negotiated the Croatian–Hungarian Settlement in 1868. After 1878, Bosnia and Herzegovina came under Austro-Hungarian joint military and civilian rule until it was fully annexed in 1908, provoking the Bosnian crisis.
Austria-Hungary was one of the Central Powers in World War I, which began with an Austro-Hungarian war declaration on the Kingdom of Serbia on 28 July 1914. It was already effectively dissolved by the time the military authorities signed the armistice of Villa Giusti on 3 November 1918. The Kingdom of Hungary and the First Austrian Republic were treated as its successors de jure, whereas the independence of the First Czechoslovak Republic, the Second Polish Republic, and the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, respectively, and most of the territorial demands of the Kingdom of Romania and the Kingdom of Italy were also recognized by the victorious powers in 1920.
Name and terminology
The realm's official name was the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy (German: Österreichisch-Ungarische Monarchie, IPA: [ˈøːstəʁaɪçɪʃ ˈʊŋɡaʁɪʃə monaʁˈçiː]; Hungarian: Osztrák–Magyar Monarchia, IPA: [ˈostraːk ˈmɒɟɒr ˈmonɒrɦijɒ]), though in international relations Austria–Hungary was used (German: Österreich-Ungarn; Hungarian: Ausztria-Magyarország). The Austrians also used the names k. u. k. Monarchie (English: k. u. k. monarchy) (in detail German: Kaiserliche und königliche Monarchie Österreich-Ungarn; Hungarian: Császári és Királyi Osztrák–Magyar Monarchia) and Danubian Monarchy (German: Donaumonarchie; Hungarian: Dunai Monarchia) or Dual Monarchy (German: Doppel-Monarchie; Hungarian: Dual-Monarchia) and The Double Eagle (German: Der Doppel-Adler; Hungarian: Kétsas), but none of these became widespread either in Hungary or elsewhere.
The realm's full name used in internal administration was The Kingdoms and Lands Represented in the Imperial Council and the Lands of the Holy Hungarian Crown of St. Stephen.
- German: Die im Reichsrat vertretenen Königreiche und Länder und die Länder der Heiligen Ungarischen Stephanskrone
- Hungarian: A Birodalmi Tanácsban képviselt királyságok és országok és a Magyar Szent Korona országai
From 1867 onwards, the abbreviations heading the names of official institutions in Austria–Hungary reflected their responsibility:
- k. u. k. (kaiserlich und königlich or Imperial and Royal) was the label for institutions common to both parts of the monarchy, e.g., the k.u.k. Kriegsmarine (Navy) and, during the war, the k.u.k. Armee (Army). The common army changed its label from k.k. to k.u.k. only in 1889 at the request of the Hungarian government.
- K. k. (kaiserlich-königlich) or Imperial-Royal was the term for institutions of Cisleithania (Austria); "royal" in this label referred to the Crown of Bohemia.
- K. u. (königlich-ungarisch) or M. k. (Magyar királyi) ("Royal Hungarian") referred to Transleithania, the lands of the Hungarian crown. In the Kingdom of Croatia and Slavonia, the autonomous institutions used k. (kraljevski) ("Royal"), since according to the Croatian–Hungarian Settlement, the only official language in Croatia and Slavonia was Croatian, and the institutions were "only" Croatian.
Following a decision of Franz Joseph I in 1868, the realm bore the official name Austro-Hungarian Monarchy/Realm (German: Österreichisch-Ungarische Monarchie/Reich; Hungarian: Osztrák–Magyar Monarchia/Birodalom) in its international relations. It was often contracted to the "Dual Monarchy" in English or simply referred to as Austria.
Background and establishment
Following Hungary's defeat against the Ottoman Empire in the Battle of Mohács of 1526, the Habsburg Empire became more involved in the Kingdom of Hungary, and subsequently assumed the Hungarian throne. However, as the Ottomans expanded further into Hungary, the Habsburgs came to control only a small north-western portion of the former kingdom's territory. Eventually, following the Treaty of Passarowitz in 1718, all former territories of the Hungarian kingdom were ceded from the Ottomans to the Habsburgs. In the revolutions of 1848, the Kingdom of Hungary called for greater self-government and later even independence from the Austrian Empire. The ensuing Hungarian Revolution of 1848 was crushed by the Austrian military with Russian military assistance, and the level of autonomy that the Hungarian state had enjoyed was replaced with absolutist rule from Vienna. This further increased Hungarian resentment of the Habsburg dominion.[citation needed]
In the 1860s, the Empire faced two severe defeats: its loss in the Second Italian War of Independence broke its dominion over a large part of Northern Italy (Lombardy, Veneto, Modena, Reggio, Tuscany, Parma and Piacenza) while defeat in the Austro-Prussian War of 1866 led to the dissolution of the German Confederation (of which the Habsburg emperor was the hereditary president) and the exclusion of Austria from German affairs. These twin defeats gave the Hungarians the opportunity to remove the shackles of absolutist rule.[citation needed]
Realizing the need to compromise with Hungary in order to retain its great power status, the central government in Vienna began negotiations with the Hungarian political leaders, led by Ferenc Deák. The Hungarians maintained that the April Laws were still valid, but conceded that under the Pragmatic Sanction of 1713, foreign affairs and defence were "common" to Austria and Hungary. On 20 March 1867, the newly re-established Hungarian parliament at Pest started to negotiate the new laws to be accepted on 30 March. However, Hungarian leaders received word that the Emperor's formal coronation as King of Hungary on 8 June had to have taken place in order for the laws to be enacted within the lands of the Holy Crown of Hungary. On 28 July, Franz Joseph, in his new capacity as King of Hungary, approved and promulgated the new laws, which officially gave birth to the Dual Monarchy.
1866–1878: beyond Lesser Germany
The Austro-Prussian War was ended by the Peace of Prague (1866) which settled the "German question" in favor of a Lesser German Solution.Count Friedrich Ferdinand von Beust, who was the foreign minister from 1866 to 1871, hated the Prussian chancellor, Otto von Bismarck, who had repeatedly outmaneuvered him. Beust looked to France for avenging Austria's defeat and attempted to negotiate with Emperor Napoleon III of France and Italy for an anti-Prussian alliance, but no terms could be reached. The decisive victory of the Prusso-German armies in the Franco-Prussian war and the subsequent founding of the German Empire ended all hope of re-establishing Austrian influence in Germany, and Beust retired.
After being forced out of Germany and Italy, the Dual Monarchy turned to the Balkans, which were in tumult as nationalistic movements were gaining strength and demanding independence. Both Russia and Austria–Hungary saw an opportunity to expand in this region. Russia took on the role of protector of Slavs and Orthodox Christians. Austria envisioned a multi-ethnic, religiously diverse empire under Vienna's control. Count Gyula Andrássy, a Hungarian who was Foreign Minister (1871–1879), made the centerpiece of his policy one of opposition to Russian expansion in the Balkans and blocking Serbian ambitions to dominate a new South Slav federation. He wanted Germany to ally with Austria, not Russia.
Government
The Compromise of 1867 turned the Habsburg domains into a real union between the Austrian Empire ("Lands Represented in the Imperial Council", or Cisleithania) in the western and northern half and the Kingdom of Hungary ("Lands of the Crown of Saint Stephen", or Transleithania) in the eastern half.
The government of Austria, which had ruled the monarchy until 1867, became the government of the Austrian part, and another government was formed for the Hungarian part. The common government (officially designated Ministerial Council for Common Affairs, or Ministerrat für gemeinsame Angelegenheiten in German) formed for the few matters of common national security - the Common Army, Navy, foreign policy and the imperial household, and the customs union. Although the two halves shared a common monarch and both foreign relations and defense were managed jointly, all other state functions were to be handled separately as there was no common citizenship.
Hungary and Austria maintained separate parliaments, each with its own prime minister: the Diet of Hungary (commonly known as the National Assembly) and the Imperial Council (German: Reichsrat) in Cisleithania. Each parliament had its own executive government, appointed by the monarch.
After 1878, Bosnia and Herzegovina came under Austro-Hungarian military and civilian rule until it was fully annexed in 1908, provoking the Bosnian crisis with the Great Powers and Austria-Hungary's Balkan neighbors, Serbia and Montenegro.
Relations during the half-century after 1867 between the two parts of the dual monarchy featured repeated disputes over shared external tariff arrangements and over the financial contribution of each government to the common treasury. These matters were determined by the Austro-Hungarian Compromise of 1867, in which common expenditures were allocated 70% to Austria and 30% to Hungary. This division had to be renegotiated every ten years. There was political turmoil during the build-up to each renewal of the agreement. By 1907, the Hungarian share had risen to 36.4%. The disputes culminated in the early 1900s in a prolonged constitutional crisis. It was triggered by disagreement over which language to use for command in Hungarian army units and deepened by the advent to power in Budapest in April 1906 of a Hungarian nationalist coalition. Provisional renewals of the common arrangements occurred in October 1907 and in November 1917 on the basis of the status quo. The negotiations in 1917 ended with the dissolution of the Dual Monarchy.
Demographics
In July 1849, the Hungarian Revolutionary Parliament proclaimed and enacted ethnic and minority rights (the next such laws were in Switzerland), but these were overturned after the Russian and Austrian armies crushed the Hungarian Revolution. After the Kingdom of Hungary reached the Compromise with the Habsburg Dynasty in 1867, one of the first acts of its restored Parliament was to pass a Law on Nationalities (Act Number XLIV of 1868). It was a liberal piece of legislation and offered extensive language and cultural rights. It did not recognize non-Hungarians to have rights to form states with any territorial autonomy.
Article 19 of the 1867 "Basic State Act" (Staatsgrundgesetz), valid only for the Cisleithanian (Austrian) part of Austria–Hungary, said:
All races of the empire have equal rights, and every race has an inviolable right to the preservation and use of its own nationality and language. The equality of all customary languages ("landesübliche Sprachen") in school, office and public life, is recognized by the state. In those territories in which several races dwell, the public and educational institutions are to be so arranged that, without applying compulsion to learn a second country language ("Landessprache"), each of the races receives the necessary means of education in its own language.
The implementation of this principle led to several disputes, as it was not clear which languages could be regarded as "customary". The Germans, the traditional bureaucratic, capitalist and cultural elite, demanded the recognition of their language as a customary language in every part of the empire. German nationalists, especially in the Sudetenland (part of Bohemia), looked to Berlin in the new German Empire.
The Hungarian Minority Act of 1868 gave the minorities (Slovaks, Romanians, Serbs, et al.) individual (but not also communal) rights to use their language in offices, schools (although in practice often only in those founded by them and not by the state), courts and municipalities (if 20% of the deputies demanded it). Beginning with the 1879 Primary Education Act and the 1883 Secondary Education Act, the Hungarian state made more efforts to reduce the use of non-Magyar languages, in strong violation of the 1868 Nationalities Law. After 1875, all Slovak language schools higher than elementary were closed, including the only three high schools (gymnasiums) in Revúca (Nagyrőce), Turčiansky Svätý Martin (Turócszentmárton) and Kláštor pod Znievom (Znióváralja).
Language was, as a proxy for ethnicity, one of the most contentious issues in Austro-Hungarian politics. All governments faced difficult and divisive hurdles in deciding on the languages of government and of instruction. The minorities sought the widest opportunities for education in their own languages, as well as in the "dominant" languages—Hungarian and German. By the "Ordinance of 5 April 1897", the Austrian Prime Minister Count Kasimir Felix Badeni gave Czech equal standing with German in the internal government of Bohemia; this led to a crisis because of nationalist German agitation throughout the empire. The Crown dismissed Badeni.
Italian was regarded as an old "culture language" (Kultursprache) by German intellectuals and had always been granted equal rights as an official language of the Empire, but the Germans had difficulty in accepting the Slavic languages as equal to their own. On one occasion Count A. Auersperg (Anastasius Grün) entered the Diet of Carniola carrying what he claimed to be the whole corpus of Slovene literature under his arm; this was to demonstrate that the Slovene language could not be substituted for German as the language of higher education.
The following years saw official recognition of several languages, at least in Austria. Since 1867, laws awarded Croatian equal status with Italian in Dalmatia. Beginning in 1882, there was a Slovene majority in the Diet of Carniola and in the capital Laibach (Ljubljana); they replaced German with Slovene as their primary official language. Galicia designated Polish instead of German in 1869 as the customary language of government.
As of June 1907, all public and private schools in Hungary were obliged to ensure that after the fourth grade, the pupils could express themselves fluently in Hungarian. This led to the further closing of minority schools, devoted mostly to the Slovak and Rusyn languages. The two kingdoms sometimes divided their spheres of influence. According to Misha Glenny in his book, The Balkans, 1804–1999, the Austrians responded to Hungarian support of Czechs by supporting the Croatian national movement in Zagreb. In recognition that he reigned in a multi-ethnic country, Emperor Franz Joseph spoke (and used) German, Hungarian and Czech fluently, and Croatian, Serbian, Polish and Italian to some degree.
The language disputes were most fiercely fought in Bohemia, where the Czech speakers formed a majority and sought equal status for their language to German. The Czechs had lived primarily in Bohemia since the 6th century and German immigrants had begun settling the Bohemian periphery in the 13th century. The constitution of 1627 made the German language a second official language and equal to Czech. German speakers lost their majority in the Bohemian Diet in 1880 and became a minority to Czech speakers in the cities of Prague and Pilsen (while retaining a slight numerical majority in the city of Brno (Brünn)). The old Charles University in Prague, hitherto dominated by German speakers, was divided into German and Czech-speaking faculties in 1882.
At the same time, Hungarian dominance faced challenges from the local majorities of Romanians in Transylvania and in the eastern Banat, Slovaks in today's Slovakia, and Croats and Serbs in the crown lands of Croatia and of Dalmatia (today's Croatia), in Bosnia and Herzegovina and in the provinces known as the Vojvodina (today's northern Serbia). The Romanians and the Serbs began to agitate for union with their fellow nationalists and language speakers in the newly founded states of Romania (1859–1878) and Serbia.[citation needed]
Hungary's leaders were generally less willing than their Austrian counterparts to share power with their subject minorities, but they granted a large measure of autonomy to Croatia in 1868. To some extent, they modeled their relationship to that kingdom on their own compromise with Austria of the previous year. In spite of nominal autonomy, the Croatian government was an economic and administrative part of Hungary, which the Croatians resented. In the Kingdom of Croatia-Slavonia and Bosnia and Herzegovina many advocated the idea of a trialist Austro-Hungaro-Croatian monarchy; among the supporters of the idea were Archduke Leopold Salvator, Archduke Franz Ferdinand and emperor and king Charles I who during his short reign supported the trialist idea only to be vetoed by the Hungarian government and Count István Tisza. The count finally signed the trialist proclamation after heavy pressure from the king on 23 October 1918.
Ethnic relations
In Istria, the Istro-Romanians, a small ethnic group composed by around 2,600 people in the 1880s, suffered severe discrimination. The Croats of the region, who formed the majority, tried to assimilate them, while the Italian minority supported them in their requests for self-determination. In 1888, the possibility of opening the first school for the Istro-Romanians teaching in the Romanian language was discussed in the Diet of Istria. The proposal was very popular among them. The Italian deputies showed their support, but the Croat ones opposed it and tried to show that the Istro-Romanians were in fact Slavs. During Austro-Hungarian rule, the Istro-Romanians lived under poverty conditions, and those living in the island of Krk were fully assimilated by 1875.
Around 1900, Jews numbered about two million in the whole territory of the Austro-Hungarian Empire; their position was ambiguous. The populist and antisemitic politics of the Christian Social Party are sometimes viewed as a model for Adolf Hitler's Nazism. Antisemitic parties and movements existed, but the governments of Vienna and Budapest did not initiate pogroms or implement official antisemitic policies.[citation needed] They feared that such ethnic violence could ignite other ethnic minorities and escalate out of control. The antisemitic parties remained on the periphery of the political sphere due to their low popularity among voters in the parliamentary elections.[citation needed]
In that period, the majority of Jews in Austria–Hungary lived in small towns (shtetls) in Galicia and rural areas in Hungary and Bohemia; however, they had large communities and even local majorities in the downtown districts of Vienna, Budapest, Prague, Kraków and Lwów. Of the pre-World War I military forces of the major European powers, the Austro-Hungarian army was almost alone in its regular promotion of Jews to positions of command. While the Jewish population of the lands of the Dual Monarchy was about 5%, Jews made up nearly 18% of the reserve officer corps. Thanks to the modernity of the constitution and to the benevolence of emperor Franz Joseph, the Austrian Jews came to regard the era of Austria–Hungary as a golden era of their history. By 1910 about 900,000 religious[clarification needed] Jews made up approximately 5% of the population of Hungary and about 23% of Budapest's citizenry. In the Austro-Hungarian Empire the generally fiercely patriotic Hungarian Jews were securing the tenuous Hungarian majority in the Kingdom of Hungary. Jews accounted for 54% of commercial business owners, 85% of financial institution directors and owners in banking, and 62% of all employees in commerce, 20% of all general grammar school students, and 37% of all commercial scientific grammar school students, 31.9% of all engineering students, and 34.1% of all students in human faculties of the universities. Jews accounted for 48.5% of all physicians, and 49.4% of all lawyers/jurists in Hungary. Note: The numbers of Jews were reconstructed from religious censuses. They did not include the people of Jewish origin who had converted to Christianity, or the number of atheists.[citation needed] Among many Hungarian parliament members of Jewish origin, the most famous Jewish members in Hungarian political life were Vilmos Vázsonyi as Minister of Justice, Samu Hazai as Minister of War, János Teleszky as minister of finance, as minister of trade, and as minister of trade.
Education
This section needs additional citations for verification. (April 2023) |
Universities in Cisleithania
The first university in the Austrian half of the Empire (Charles University) was founded by Emperor Charles IV in Prague in 1347, the second oldest university was the Jagiellonian University established in Kraków by the King of Poland Casimir III the Great in 1364, while the third oldest (University of Vienna) was founded by Duke Rudolph IV in 1365.
The higher educational institutions were predominantly German, but beginning in the 1870s, language shifts began to occur. These establishments, which in the middle of the 19th century had had a predominantly German character, underwent in Galicia a conversion into Polish national institutions, in Bohemia and Moravia a separation into German and Czech ones. Thus Germans, Czechs and Poles were provided for. But now the smaller nations also made their voices heard: the Ruthenians, Slovenes and Italians. The Ruthenians demanded at first, in view of the predominantly Ruthenian character of rural East Galicia, a national partition of the Polish University of Lwów. Since the Poles were at first unyielding, Ruthenian demonstrations and strikes of students arose, and the Ruthenians were no longer content with the reversion of a few separate professorial chairs, and with parallel courses of lectures. By a pact concluded on 28 January 1914 the Poles promised a Ruthenian university; but owing to the war the question lapsed. The Italians could hardly claim a university of their own on grounds of population (in 1910 they numbered 783,000), but they claimed it all the more on grounds of their ancient culture. All parties were agreed that an Italian faculty of laws should be created; the difficulty lay in the choice of the place. The Italians demanded Trieste; but the Government was afraid to let this Adriatic port become the centre of an irredenta; moreover the Southern Slavs of the city wished it kept free from an Italian educational establishment. Bienerth in 1910 brought about a compromise; namely, that it should be founded at once, the situation to be provisionally in Vienna, and to be transferred within four years to Italian national territory. The German National Union (Nationalverband) agreed to extend temporary hospitality to the Italian university in Vienna, but the Southern Slav Hochschule Club demanded a guarantee that a later transfer to the coast provinces should not be contemplated, together with the simultaneous foundation of Slovene professorial chairs in Prague and Cracow, and preliminary steps towards the foundation of a Southern Slav university in Laibach. But in spite of the constant renewal of negotiations for a compromise it was impossible to arrive at any agreement, until the outbreak of war left all the projects for a Ruthenian university at Lemberg, a Slovene one in Laibach, and a second Czech one in Moravia, unrealized.
Universities in Transleithania
In the year 1276, the university of Veszprém was destroyed by the troops of Péter Csák and it was never rebuilt. A university was established by Louis I of Hungary in Pécs in 1367. Sigismund established a university at Óbuda in 1395. Another, Universitas Istropolitana, was established 1465 in Pozsony (now Bratislava in Slovakia) by Mattias Corvinus. None of these medieval universities survived the Ottoman wars. Nagyszombat University was founded in 1635 and moved to Buda in 1777 and it is called Eötvös Loránd University today. The world's first institute of technology was founded in Selmecbánya, Kingdom of Hungary (since 1920 Banská Štiavnica, now Slovakia) in 1735. Its legal successor is the University of Miskolc in Hungary. The Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME) is considered the oldest institute of technology in the world with university rank and structure. Its legal predecessor the Institutum Geometrico-Hydrotechnicum was founded in 1782 by Emperor Joseph II.
The high schools included the universities, of which Hungary possessed five, all maintained by the state: at Budapest (founded in 1635), at Kolozsvár (founded in 1872), and at Zagreb (founded in 1874). Newer universities were established in Debrecen in 1912, and Pozsony university was reestablished after a half millennium in 1912. They had four faculties: theology, law, philosophy and medicine (the university at Zagreb was without a faculty of medicine). There were in addition ten high schools of law, called academies, which in 1900 were attended by 1,569 pupils. The Polytechnicum in Budapest, founded in 1844, which contained four faculties and was attended in 1900 by 1,772 pupils, was also considered a high school. There were in Hungary in 1900 forty-nine theological colleges, twenty-nine Catholic, five Greek Uniat, four Greek Orthodox, ten Protestant and one Jewish. Among special schools the principal mining schools were at Selmeczbánya, Nagyág and Felsőbánya; the principal agricultural colleges at Debreczen and Kolozsvár; and there was a school of forestry at Selmeczbánya, military colleges at Budapest, Kassa, Déva and Zagreb, and a naval school at Fiume. There were in addition a number of training institutes for teachers and a large number of schools of commerce, several art schools – for design, painting, sculpture, and music.[citation needed]
| Major nationalities in Hungary | Rate of literacy in 1910 |
|---|---|
| German | 70.7% |
| Hungarian | 67.1% |
| Croatian | 62.5% |
| Slovak | 58.1% |
| Serbian | 51.3% |
| Romanian | 28.2% |
| Ruthenian | 22.2% |
Economy
The heavily rural Austro-Hungarian economy slowly modernised after 1867. Railroads opened up once-remote areas, and cities grew. Many small firms promoted capitalist way of production. Technological change accelerated industrialization and urbanization. The first Austrian stock exchange (the Wiener Börse) was opened in 1771 in Vienna, the first stock exchange of the Kingdom of Hungary (the Budapest Stock Exchange) was opened in Budapest in 1864. The central bank (Bank of issue) was founded as Austrian National Bank in 1816. In 1878, it transformed into Austro-Hungarian National Bank with principal offices in both Vienna and Budapest. The central bank was governed by alternating Austrian or Hungarian governors and vice-governors. Austria-Hungary also became the world's third-largest manufacturer and exporter of electric home appliances, electric industrial appliances, and power generation apparatus for power plants, after the United States and the German Empire, and it constructed Europe's second-largest railway network, after the German Empire. In 2000, a study estimated that GDP in constant national prices in 1913 was 19,140.8 million for Cisleithania and 10,971.6 million for Transleithania, a combined 30,112.4 million krone. According to a 2005 study, GDP (PPP) in 1913 was 105,515 million 1990 Int$, the fifth-largest in Europe.
The gross national product per capita grew roughly 1.76% per year from 1870 to 1913. That level of growth compared very favorably to that of other European nations such as Britain (1%), France (1.06%), and Germany (1.51%). However, in a comparison with Germany and Britain, the Austro-Hungarian economy as a whole still lagged considerably, as sustained modernization had begun much later. Like the German Empire, that of Austria–Hungary frequently employed liberal economic policies and practices. In 1873, the old Hungarian capital Buda and Óbuda (Ancient Buda) were officially merged with the third city, Pest, thus creating the new metropolis of Budapest. The dynamic Pest grew into Hungary's administrative, political, economic, trade and cultural hub. Many of the state institutions and the modern administrative system of Hungary were established during this period. Economic growth centered on Vienna and Budapest, the Austrian lands (areas of modern Austria), the Alpine region and the Bohemian lands. In the later years of the 19th century, rapid economic growth spread to the central Hungarian plain and to the Carpathian lands. As a result, wide disparities of development existed within the empire. In general, the western areas became more developed than the eastern ones. The Kingdom of Hungary became the world's second-largest flour exporter after the United States. The large Hungarian food exports were not limited to neighbouring Germany and Italy: Hungary became the most important foreign food supplier of the large cities and industrial centres of the United Kingdom. Galicia, which has been described as the poorest province of Austro-Hungary, experienced near-constant famines, resulting in 50,000 deaths a year. The Istro-Romanians of Istria were also poor, as pastoralism lost strength and agriculture was not productive.
However, by the end of the 19th century, economic differences gradually began to even out as economic growth in the eastern parts of the monarchy consistently surpassed that in the western. The strong agriculture and food industry of the Kingdom of Hungary with the centre of Budapest became predominant within the empire and made up a large proportion of the export to the rest of Europe. Meanwhile, western areas, concentrated mainly around Prague and Vienna, excelled in various manufacturing industries. This division of labour between the east and west, besides the existing economic and monetary union, led to an even more rapid economic growth throughout Austria–Hungary by the early 20th century. However, since the turn of the twentieth century, the Austrian half of the Monarchy could preserve its dominance within the empire in the sectors of the Industrial Revolution, but Hungary had a better position in the modern industries of the Second Industrial Revolution, in these modern sectors of the second industrial revolution (like machine building industry and electric industry) the Austrian competition could not become dominant.
Infrastructure
Telecommunications
Telegraph
The first telegraph connection (Vienna—Brno—Prague) had started operation in 1847. In Hungarian territory the first telegraph stations were opened in Pressburg (Pozsony, today's Bratislava) in December 1847 and in Buda in 1848. The first telegraph connection between Vienna and Pest–Buda (later Budapest) was constructed in 1850,[citation needed] and Vienna–Zagreb in 1850.
Austria subsequently joined a telegraph union with German states. In the Kingdom of Hungary, 2,406 telegraph post offices operated in 1884. By 1914 the number of telegraph offices reached 3,000 in post offices and further 2,400 were installed in the railway stations of the Kingdom of Hungary.
Telephone
The first telephone exchange was opened in Zagreb (8 January 1881), the second was in Budapest (1 May 1881), and the third was opened in Vienna (3 June 1881). Initially telephony was available in the homes of individual subscribers, companies and offices. Public telephone stations appeared in the 1890s, and they quickly became widespread in post offices and railway stations. Austria–Hungary had 568 million telephone calls in 1913; only two Western European countries had more phone calls: the German Empire and the United Kingdom. The Austro-Hungarian Empire was followed by France with 396 million telephone calls and Italy with 230 million phone calls. In 1916, there were 366 million telephone calls in Cisleithania, among them 8.4 million long distant calls. All telephone exchanges of the cities, towns and larger villages in Transleithania were linked until 1893.[citation needed] By 1914, more than 2000 settlements had telephone exchange in Kingdom of Hungary.
Electronic audio broadcasting
The Telefon Hírmondó (Telephone Herald) news and entertainment service was introduced in Budapest in 1893. Two decades before the introduction of radio broadcasting, people could listen to political, economic and sports news, cabaret, music and opera in Budapest daily. It operated over a special type of telephone exchange system.
Rail transport
By 1913, the combined length of the railway tracks of the Austrian Empire and Kingdom of Hungary reached 43,280 kilometres (26,890 miles). In Western Europe only Germany had more extended railway network (63,378 km, 39,381 mi); the Austro-Hungarian Empire was followed by France (40,770 km, 25,330 mi), the United Kingdom (32,623 km, 20,271 mi), Italy (18,873 km, 11,727 mi) and Spain (15,088 km, 9,375 mi).
Railways in Transleithania
The first Hungarian steam locomotive railway line was opened on 15 July 1846 between Pest and Vác. In 1890 most large Hungarian private railway companies were nationalized as a consequence of the poor management of private companies, except the strong Austrian-owned Kaschau-Oderberg Railway (KsOd) and the Austrian-Hungarian Southern Railway (SB/DV). They also joined the zone tariff system of the MÁV (Hungarian State Railways). By 1910, the total length of the rail networks of Hungarian Kingdom reached 22,869 kilometres (14,210 miles), the Hungarian network linked more than 1,490 settlements. Nearly half (52%) of the empire's railways were built in Hungary, thus the railroad density there became higher than that of Cisleithania. This has ranked Hungarian railways the 6th most dense in the world (ahead of Germany and France).
Electrified commuter railways: A set of four electric commuter rai lines were built in Budapest, the BHÉV: Ráckeve line (1887), Szentendre line (1888), Gödöllő line (1888), Csepel line (1912)
Tramway lines in the cities
Horse-drawn tramways appeared in the first half of the 19th century. Between the 1850s and 1880s many were built : Vienna (1865), Budapest (1866), Brno (1869), Trieste (1876). Steam trams appeared in the late 1860s. The electrification of tramways started in the late 1880s. The first electrified tramway in Austria–Hungary was built in Budapest in 1887.
Electric tramway lines in the Austrian Empire:
- Austria: Gmunden (1894); Linz, Vienna (1897); Graz (1898); Trieste (1900); Ljubljana (1901); Innsbruck (1905); Unterlach, Ybbs an der Donau (1907); Salzburg (1909); Klagenfurt, Sankt Pölten (1911); Piran (1912)
- Austrian Littoral: Pula (1904).
- Bohemia: Prague (1891); Teplice (1895); Liberec (1897); Ústí nad Labem, Plzeň, Olomouc (1899); Moravia, Brno, Jablonec nad Nisou (1900); Ostrava (1901); Mariánské Lázně (1902); Budějovice, České Budějovice, Jihlava (1909)
- Austrian Silesia: Opava (Troppau) (1905), Cieszyn (Cieszyn) (1911)
- Dalmatia: Dubrovnik (1910)
- Galicia: Lviv (1894), Bielsko-Biała (1895); Kraków (1901); Tarnów, Cieszyn (1911)
Electric tramway lines in the Kingdom of Hungary:
- Hungary: Budapest (1887); Pressburg/Pozsony/Bratislava (1895); Szabadka/Subotica (1897), Szombathely (1897), Miskolc (1897); Temesvár/Timișoara (1899); Sopron (1900); Szatmárnémeti/Satu Mare (1900); Nyíregyháza (1905); Nagyszeben/Sibiu (1905); Nagyvárad/Oradea (1906); Szeged (1908); Debrecen (1911); Újvidék/Novi Sad (1911); Kassa/Košice (1913); Pécs (1913)
- Croatia: Fiume (1899); Pula (1904); Opatija – Lovran (1908); Zagreb (1910); Dubrovnik (1910).
Underground
The Budapest Metro Line 1 (originally the "Franz Joseph Underground Electric Railway Company") is the second oldest underground railway in the world (the first being the London Underground's Metropolitan Line and the third being Glasgow), and the first on the European mainland. It was built from 1894 to 1896 and opened on 2 May 1896. In 2002, it was listed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site. The M1 line became an IEEE Milestone due to the radically new innovations in its era: "Among the railway's innovative elements were bidirectional tram cars; electric lighting in the subway stations and tram cars; and an overhead wire structure instead of a third-rail system for power".
Inland waterways and river regulation
The first Danubian steamer company, Donaudampfschiffahrtsgesellschaft (DDSG), was the world's largest inland shipping company until the collapse of Austria-Hungary.
In 1900 the engineer C. Wagenführer drew up plans to link the Danube and the Adriatic Sea by a canal from Vienna to Trieste. It was born from the desire of Austria–Hungary to have a direct link to the Adriatic Sea but was never constructed.
Lower Danube and the Iron Gates
In 1831 a plan had already been drafted to make the passage navigable, at the initiative of the Hungarian politician István Széchenyi. Finally Gábor Baross, Hungary's "Iron Minister", succeeded in financing this project. The riverbed rocks and the associated rapids made the gorge valley an infamous passage for shipping. In German, the passage is still known as the Kataraktenstrecke, even though the cataracts are gone. Near the actual "Iron Gates" strait the Prigrada rock was the most important obstacle until 1896: the river widened considerably here and the water level was consequently low. Upstream, the Greben rock near the "Kazan" gorge was notorious.
Tisza River
The length of the Tisza river in Hungary used to be 1,419 kilometres (882 miles). It flowed through the Great Hungarian Plain, which is one of the largest flat areas in central Europe. Since plains can cause a river to flow very slowly, the Tisza used to follow a path with many curves and turns, which led to many large floods in the area.
After several small-scale attempts, István Széchenyi organised the "regulation of the Tisza" (Hungarian: a Tisza szabályozása) which started on 27 August 1846, and substantially ended in 1880. The new length of the river in Hungary was 966 km (600 mi) (1,358 km (844 mi) total), with 589 km (366 mi) of "dead channels" and 136 km (85 mi) of new riverbed. The resultant length of the flood-protected river comprises 2,940 km (1,830 mi) (out of 4,220 km (2,620 mi) of all Hungarian protected rivers).
Shipping and ports
The most important seaport was Trieste (today part of Italy), where the Austrian merchant marine was based. Two major shipping companies (Austrian Lloyd and Austro-Americana) and several shipyards were located there. From 1815 to 1866, Venice had been part of the Habsburg empire. The loss of Venice prompted the development of the Austrian merchant marine. By 1913, the commercial marine of Austria, comprised 16,764 vessels with a tonnage of 471,252, and crews number-ing 45,567. Of the total (1913) 394 of 422,368 tons were steamers, and 16,370 of 48,884 tons were sailing vessels The Austrian Lloyd was one of the biggest ocean shipping companies of the time. Prior to the beginning of World War I, the company owned 65 middle-sized and large steamers. The Austro-Americana owned one third of this number, including the biggest Austrian passenger ship, the SS Kaiser Franz Joseph I. In comparison to the Austrian Lloyd, the Austro-American concentrated on destinations in North and South America. The Austro-Hungarian Navy became much more significant than previously, as industrialization provided sufficient revenues to develop it. Pola (Pula, today part of Croatia) was especially significant for the navy.
The most important seaport for the Hungarian part of the monarchy was Fiume (Rijeka, today part of Croatia), where the Hungarian shipping companies, such as the Adria, operated. The commercial marine of the Kingdom of Hungary in 1913 comprised 545 vessels of 144,433 tons, and crews numbering 3,217. Of the total number of vessels 134,000 of 142,539 tons were steamers, and 411 of 1,894 tons were sailing vessels.
Military
The Austro-Hungarian Army was under the command of Archduke Albrecht, Duke of Teschen (1817–1895), an old-fashioned bureaucrat who opposed modernization. The military system of the Austro-Hungarian monarchy was similar in both states, and rested since 1868 upon the principle of the universal and personal obligation of the citizen to bear arms. Its military force was composed of the Common Army; the special armies, namely the Austrian Landwehr, and the Hungarian Honvéd, which were separate national institutions, and the Landsturm or levy-en masse. As stated above, the common army stood under the administration of the joint minister of war, while the special armies were under the administration of the respective ministries of national defence. The yearly contingent of recruits for the army was fixed by the military bills voted on by the Austrian and Hungarian parliaments and was generally determined on the basis of the population, according to the last census returns. It amounted in 1905 to 103,100 men, of which Austria furnished 59,211 men, and Hungary 43,889. Besides 10,000 men were annually allotted to the Austrian Landwehr, and 12,500 to the Hungarian Honved. The term of service was two years (three years in the cavalry) with the colours, seven or eight in the reserve and two in the Landwehr; in the case of men not drafted to the active army the same total period of service was spent in various special reserves.
The common minister of war was the head for the administration of all military affairs, except those of the Austrian Landwehr and of the Hungarian Honved, which were committed to the ministries for national defence of the two respective states. But the supreme command of the army was nominally vested in the monarch, who had the power to take all measures regarding the whole army. In practice, the emperor's nephew Archduke Albrecht was his chief military advisor and made the policy decisions.
The Austro-Hungarian Navy was mainly a coast defence force, and also included a flotilla of monitors for the Danube. It was administered by the naval department of the ministry of war.
1878–1914: Congress of Berlin, Balkan instability and the Bosnia Crisis
Russian Pan-Slavic organizations sent aid to the Balkan rebels and so pressured the tsar's government to declare war on the Ottoman Empire in 1877 in the name of protecting Orthodox Christians. Unable to mediate between the Ottoman Empire and Russia over the control of Serbia, Austria–Hungary declared neutrality when the conflict between the two powers escalated into a war. With help from Romania and Greece, Russia defeated the Ottomans and with the Treaty of San Stefano tried to create a large pro-Russian Bulgaria.
This treaty sparked an international uproar that almost resulted in a general European war. Austria–Hungary and Britain feared that a large Bulgaria would become a Russian satellite that would enable the tsar to dominate the Balkans. British prime minister Benjamin Disraeli moved warships into position against Russia to halt the advance of Russian influence in the eastern Mediterranean so close to Britain's route through the Suez Canal. The Treaty of San Stefano was seen in Austria as much too favourable for Russia and its Orthodox-Slavic goals.
The Congress of Berlin rolled back the Russian victory by partitioning the large Bulgarian state that Russia had carved out of Ottoman territory and denying any part of Bulgaria full independence from the Ottomans. The Congress of Berlin in 1878 let Austria occupy (but not annex) the province of Bosnia and Herzegovina, a predominantly Slavic area. Austria occupied Bosnia and Herzegovina as a way of gaining power in the Balkans. Serbia, Montenegro and Romania became fully independent. Nonetheless, the Balkans remained a site of political unrest with teeming ambition for independence and great power rivalries. At the Congress of Berlin in 1878 Gyula Andrássy (Minister of Foreign Affairs) managed to force Russia to retreat from further demands in the Balkans. As a result, Greater Bulgaria was broken up and Serbian independence was guaranteed. In that year, with Britain's support, Austria–Hungary stationed troops in Bosnia to prevent the Russians from expanding into nearby Serbia. In another measure to keep the Russians out of the Balkans, Austria–Hungary formed an alliance, the Mediterranean Entente, with Britain and Italy in 1887 and concluded mutual defence pacts with Germany in 1879 and Romania in 1883 against a possible Russian attack. Following the Congress of Berlin the European powers attempted to guarantee stability through a complex series of alliances and treaties.
Anxious about Balkan instability and Russian aggression, and to counter French interests in Europe, Austria–Hungary forged a defensive alliance with Germany in October 1879 and in May 1882. In October 1882 Italy joined this partnership in the Triple Alliance largely because of Italy's imperial rivalries with France. Tensions between Russia and Austria–Hungary remained high, so Bismarck replaced the League of the Three Emperors with the Reinsurance Treaty with Russia to keep the Habsburgs from recklessly starting a war over Pan-Slavism. The Sandžak-Raška / Novibazar region was under Austro-Hungarian occupation between 1878 and 1909, when it was returned to the Ottoman Empire, before being ultimately divided between kingdoms of Montenegro and Serbia.
On the heels of the Great Balkan Crisis, Austro-Hungarian forces occupied Bosnia and Herzegovina in August 1878 and the monarchy eventually annexed Bosnia and Herzegovina in October 1908 as a common holding of Cisleithania and Transleithania under the control of the rather than attaching it to either territorial government. The annexation in 1908 led some in Vienna to contemplate combining Bosnia and Herzegovina with Croatia to form a third Slavic component of the monarchy. The deaths of Franz Joseph's brother, Maximilian (1867), and his only son, Rudolf, made the Emperor's nephew, Franz Ferdinand, heir to the throne. The Archduke was rumoured to have been an advocate for this trialism as a means to limit the power of the Hungarian aristocracy.
A proclamation issued on the occasion of its annexation to the Habsburg monarchy in October 1908 promised these lands constitutional institutions, which should secure to their inhabitants full civil rights and a share in the management of their own affairs by means of a local representative assembly. In performance of this promise a constitution was promulgated in 1910.
The principal players in the Bosnian Crisis of 1908–09 were the foreign ministers of Austria and Russia, Alois Lexa von Aehrenthal and Alexander Izvolsky. Both were motivated by political ambition; the first would emerge successful, and the latter would be broken by the crisis. Along the way, they would drag Europe to the brink of war in 1909. They would also divide Europe into the two armed camps that would go to war in July 1914.
Aehrenthal had started with the assumption that the Slavic minorities could never come together, and the Balkan League would never cause any damage to Austria. He turned down an Ottoman proposal for an alliance that would include Austria, Turkey, and Romania. However, his policies alienated the Bulgarians, who turned instead to Russia and Serbia. Although Austria had no intention to embark on additional expansion to the south, Aehrenthal encouraged speculation to that effect, expecting that it would paralyze the Balkan states. Instead, it incited them to feverish activity to create a defensive block to stop Austria. A series of grave miscalculations at the highest level thus significantly strengthened Austria's enemies.
In 1914, Slavic militants in Bosnia rejected Austria's plan to fully absorb the area; they assassinated the Austrian heir and precipitated World War I.
1914–1918: World War I
Prelude of WW I
The 28 June 1914 assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in the Bosnian capital, Sarajevo, excessively intensified the existing traditional religion-based ethnic hostilities in Bosnia. However, in Sarajevo itself, Austrian authorities encouraged violence against the Serb residents, which resulted in anti-Serb riots in Sarajevo, in which Catholic Croats and Bosnian Muslims killed two and damaged numerous Serb-owned buildings. Writer Ivo Andrić referred to the violence as the "Sarajevo frenzy of hate." Violent actions against ethnic Serbs were organized not only in Sarajevo but also in many other larger Austro-Hungarian cities in modern-day Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Austro-Hungarian authorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina imprisoned and extradited approximately 5,500 prominent Serbs, 700 to 2,200 of whom died in prison. Four hundred sixty Serbs were sentenced to death and a predominantly Muslim special militia known as the Schutzkorps was established and carried out the persecution of Serbs.
Some members of the government, such as Minister of Foreign Affairs Count Leopold Berchtold and Army Commander Count Franz Conrad von Hötzendorf, had wanted to confront the resurgent Serbian nation for some years in a preventive war, but the Emperor and Hungarian prime minister István Tisza were opposed. The foreign ministry of Austro-Hungarian Empire sent ambassador László Szőgyény to Potsdam, where he inquired about the standpoint of the German emperor, Wilhelm II, on 5 July and received a supportive response.
His Majesty authorized me to report to [Franz Joseph] that in this case, too, we could count on Germany's full support. As mentioned, he first had to consult with the Chancellor, but he did not have the slightest doubt that Herr von Bethmann Hollweg would fully agree with him, particularly with regard to action on our part against Serbia. In his [Wilhelm's] opinion, though, there was no need to wait patiently before taking action...
The leaders of Austria–Hungary therefore decided to confront Serbia militarily before it could incite a revolt; using the assassination as an excuse, they presented a list of ten demands called the July Ultimatum, expecting Serbia would never accept. When Serbia accepted nine of the ten demands but only partially accepted the remaining one, Austria–Hungary declared war. Franz Joseph I finally followed the urgent counsel of his top advisers.
Over the course of July and August 1914, these events caused the start of World War I, as Russia mobilized in support of Serbia, setting off a series of counter-mobilizations. In support of his German ally, on Thursday, 6 August 1914, Emperor Franz Joseph signed the declaration of war on Russia. Italy initially remained neutral, despite its alliance with Austria–Hungary. In 1915, it switched to the side of the Entente powers, hoping to gain territory from its former ally.
Wartime foreign policy
with military commanders during World War I
The Austro-Hungarian Empire played a relatively passive diplomatic role in the war, as it was increasingly dominated and controlled by Germany. The only goal was to punish Serbia and try to stop the ethnic breakup of the Empire, and it completely failed. Starting in late 1916 the new Emperor Karl removed the pro-German officials and opened peace overtures to the Allies, whereby the entire war could be ended by compromise, or perhaps Austria would make a separate peace from Germany. The main effort was vetoed by Italy, which had been promised large slices of Austria for joining the Allies in 1915. Austria was only willing to turn over the Trentino region but nothing more. Karl was seen as a defeatist, which weakened his standing at home and with both the Allies and Germany.
Homefront
The heavily rural empire did have a small industrial base, but its major contributions were manpower and food. Nevertheless, Austria–Hungary was more urbanized (25%) than its actual opponents in the war, like the Russian Empire (13.4%), Serbia (13.2%) or Romania (18.8%). Furthermore, the Austro-Hungarian Empire had also more industrialized economy and higher GDP per capita than the Kingdom of Italy, which was economically the far most developed actual opponent of the Empire.
On the home front, food grew scarcer and scarcer, as did heating fuel. Hungary, with its heavy agricultural base, was somewhat better fed. The army conquered productive agricultural areas in Romania and elsewhere, but refused to allow food shipments to civilians back home. Morale fell every year, and the diverse nationalities gave up on the empire and looked for ways to establish their own nation states.
Inflation soared, from an index of 129 in 1914 to 1589 in 1918, wiping out the cash savings of the middle class. In terms of war damage to the economy, the war consumed about 20 percent of the gross domestic product. The dead soldiers amounted to about four percent of the 1914 labor force, and the wounded ones to another six percent. Compared to the major countries in the war, the death and casualty rates were toward the high end regarding the present-day territory of Austria.
By summer 1918, "Green Cadres" of army deserters formed armed bands in the hills of Croatia-Slavonia, and civil authority disintegrated. By late October, violence and massive looting erupted, and there were efforts to form peasant republics. However, the Croatian political leadership was focused on creating a new state (Yugoslavia) and worked with the advancing Serbian army to impose control and end the uprisings.
Theaters of operations
The Austro-Hungarian Empire conscripted 7.8 million soldiers during the war. General von Hötzendorf was the Chief of the Austro-Hungarian General Staff. Franz Joseph I, who was much too old to command the army, appointed Archduke Friedrich von Österreich-Teschen as Supreme Army Commander (Armeeoberkommandant), but asked him to give Von Hötzendorf freedom to take any decisions. Von Hötzendorf remained in effective command of the military forces until Emperor Karl I took supreme command himself in late 1916 and dismissed Conrad von Hötzendorf in 1917. Meanwhile, economic conditions on the home front deteriorated rapidly. The empire depended on agriculture, and agriculture depended on the heavy labor of millions of men who were now in the army. Food production fell, the transportation system became overcrowded, and industrial production could not successfully handle the overwhelming need for munitions. Germany provided a great deal of help, but it was not enough. Furthermore, the political instability of the multiple ethnic groups within the empire now ripped apart any hope for national consensus in support of the war. Increasingly there was a demand for breaking up the empire and setting up autonomous national states based on historic, language-based cultures. The new emperor sought peace terms from the Allies, but his initiatives were vetoed by Italy.[page needed]
Serbian front 1914–1916
At the start of the war, the army was divided into two: the smaller part attacked Serbia, while the larger part fought against the formidable Imperial Russian Army. The invasion of Serbia in 1914 was a disaster: by the end of the year, the Austro-Hungarian Army had taken no territory, but had lost 227,000 out of a total force of 450,000 men. However, in the autumn of 1915, the Serbian Army was defeated by the Central Powers, which led to the occupation of Serbia. Near the end of 1915, in a massive rescue operation involving more than 1,000 trips made by Italian, French and British steamers, 260,000 Serb soldiers were transported to Brindisi and Corfu, where they waited for the chance of the victory of Allied powers to reclaim their country. Corfu hosted the Serbian government in exile after the collapse of Serbia and served as a supply base for the Greek front. In April 1916 a large number of Serbian troops were transported in British and French naval vessels from Corfu to mainland Greece. The contingent numbering over 120,000 relieved a much smaller army at the Macedonian front and fought alongside British and French troops.
Russian front 1914–1917
On the Eastern front, the war started out equally poorly. The government accepted the Polish proposal of establishing the Supreme National Committee as the Polish central authority within the empire, responsible for the formation of the Polish Legions, an auxiliary military formation within the Austro-Hungarian Army. The Austro-Hungarian Army was defeated at the Battle of Lemberg and the great fortress city of Przemyśl was besieged and fell in March 1915. The Gorlice–Tarnów Offensive started as a minor German offensive to relieve the pressure of the Russian numerical superiority on the Austro-Hungarians, but the cooperation of the Central Powers resulted in huge Russian losses and the total collapse of the Russian lines and their 100 km (62 mi) long retreat into Russia. The Russian Third Army disintegrated. In summer 1915, the Austro-Hungarian Army, under a unified command with the Germans, participated in the successful Gorlice–Tarnów Offensive. From June 1916, the Russians focused their attacks on the Austro-Hungarian Army in the Brusilov Offensive, recognizing the latter's numerical inferiority. By the end of September 1916, Austria–Hungary mobilized and concentrated new divisions, and the successful Russian advance was halted and slowly repelled; but the Austrian armies took heavy losses (about 1 million men) and never recovered. Nevertheless, the huge losses in men and materiel inflicted on the Russians during the offensive contributed greatly to the Russian Revolution of 1917 and caused an economic crash in the Russian Empire.
The Act of 5 November 1916 was then proclaimed to the Poles jointly by the Emperors Wilhelm II of Germany and Franz Joseph of Austria-Hungary. This act promised the creation of the Kingdom of Poland out of the territory of Congress Poland, envisioned by its authors as a puppet state controlled by the Central Powers, with the nominal authority vested in the Regency Council. The origin of that document was the dire need to draft new recruits from German-occupied Poland for the war with Russia. Following the Armistice of 11 November 1918 ending the World War I, in spite of the previous initial total dependence of the kingdom on its sponsors, it ultimately served against their intentions as the cornerstone proto state of the nascent Second Polish Republic, the latter composed also of territories never intended by the Central Powers to be ceded to Poland.
The Battle of Zborov (1917) was the first significant action of the Czechoslovak Legions, which fought for the independence of Czechoslovakia against the Austro-Hungarian Army.
Italian front 1915–1918
In May 1915, Italy attacked Austria–Hungary. Italy was the only military opponent of Austria–Hungary which had a similar degree of industrialization and economic level; moreover, her army was numerous (≈1,000,000 men were immediately fielded), but suffered from poor leadership, training and organization. Chief of Staff Luigi Cadorna marched his army towards the Isonzo River, hoping to seize Ljubljana, and to eventually threaten Vienna. However, the Royal Italian Army were halted on the river, where four battles took place over five months (23 June – 2 December 1915). The fight was extremely bloody and exhausting for both sides.
On 15 May 1916, Austrian Chief of Staff Conrad von Hötzendorf launched the Strafexpedition ("punitive expedition"): the Austrians broke through the front and occupied the Asiago plateau. The Italians managed to resist and in a counteroffensive seized Gorizia on 9 August. Nonetheless, they had to stop on the Carso, a few kilometres away from the border. At this point, several months of indecisive trench warfare ensued (analogous to the Western front). As the Russian Empire collapsed as a result of the Bolshevik Revolution and the Russians ended their involvement in the war, Germans and Austrians were able to transfer much of their manpower to the Western and Southern fronts from the erstwhile Eastern fighting.
On 24 October 1917, Austrians (now enjoying decisive German support) attacked at Caporetto using new infiltration tactics; although they advanced more than 100 km (62.14 mi) in the direction of Venice and gained considerable supplies, they were halted and could not cross the Piave River. Italy, although suffering massive casualties, recovered from the blow, and a coalition government under Vittorio Emanuele Orlando was formed. Italy also enjoyed the support of the Entente: by 1918, large amounts of war materials and a few auxiliary American, British, and French divisions arrived in the Italian battle zone. Cadorna was replaced by General Armando Diaz; under his command, the Italians retook the initiative and won the decisive Second Battle of the Piave River (15–23 June 1918), in which some 60,000 Austrian and 43,000 Italian soldiers were killed. The final battle at Vittorio Veneto was lost by 31 October 1918 and the armistice was signed at Villa Giusti on 3 November.
Romanian front 1916–1917
On 27 August 1916, Romania declared war against Austria–Hungary. The Romanian Army crossed the borders of eastern Hungary (Transylvania), but despite initial successes, by November 1916, the Austro-Hungarian, German, Bulgarian, and Ottoman armies had defeated the Romanian and Russian armies, and occupied the southern part of Romania (including Oltenia, Muntenia and Dobruja). Within three months of the war, the Central Powers approached Bucharest, the Romanian capital. On 6 December, Bucharest was captured, and part of the population moved to the unoccupied Romanian territory, in Moldavia, together with the Romanian government, royal court and public authorities, which relocated to Iași. In 1917, after several defensive victories (managing to stop the German-Austro-Hungarian advance), with Russia's withdrawal from the war following the October Revolution, Romania was forced to drop out of the war.
Role of Hungary
Although the Kingdom of Hungary comprised only 42% of the population of Austria–Hungary, the thin majority – more than 3.8 million soldiers – of the Austro-Hungarian armed forces were conscripted from the Kingdom of Hungary during the First World War. Roughly 600,000 soldiers were killed in action, and 700,000 soldiers were wounded in the war.
Austria–Hungary held on for years, as the Hungarian half provided sufficient supplies for the military to continue to wage war. This was shown in a transition of power after which the Hungarian prime minister, Count István Tisza, and foreign minister, Count István Burián, had decisive influence over the internal and external affairs of the monarchy. By late 1916, food supply from Hungary became intermittent and the government sought an armistice with the Entente powers. However, this failed as Britain and France no longer had any regard for the integrity of the monarchy because of Austro-Hungarian support for Germany.
Analysis of defeat
The setbacks that the Austrian army suffered in 1914 and 1915 can be attributed to a large extent by the incompetence of the Austrian high command. After attacking Serbia, its forces soon had to be withdrawn to protect its eastern frontier against Russia's invasion, while German units were engaged in fighting on the Western Front. This resulted in a greater than expected loss of men in the invasion of Serbia. Furthermore, it became evident that the Austrian high command had had no plans for possible continental war and that the army and navy were also ill-equipped to handle such a conflict.
In the last two years of the war the Austro-Hungarian armed forces lost all ability to act independently of Germany. As of 7 September 1916, the German emperor was given full control of all the armed forces of the Central Powers and Austria-Hungary effectively became a satellite of Germany. The Austrians viewed the German army favorably; on the other hand, by 1916 the general belief in Germany was that Germany, in its alliance with Austria–Hungary, was "shackled to a corpse". The operational capability of the Austro-Hungarian army was seriously affected by supply shortages, low morale and a high casualty rate, and by the army's composition of multiple ethnicities with different languages and customs.
1918: Demise, disintegration, dissolution
"Overwhelmed with joy, until recently enslaved and now free Nations announce that their wicked step-mother AUSTRIA the WITCH, operated in William’s Clinic, died from senility after severe spasms, cursed by all those who had the infelicity of having to do with her. Her dreadful funeral took place during these days in the fields of Macedonia, on the Piave River and across the Rhine. Let her rest in eternal peace and may she never raise from the dead.
POLES, CZECHO-SLOVAKS, YUGOSLAVS
Funeral home Wilson & Co."
By 1918, the economic situation had deteriorated and governmental failure on the homefront ended popular support for the war. The Austro-Hungarian monarchy collapsed with dramatic speed in the autumn of 1918. Leftist and pacifist political movements organized strikes in factories, and uprisings in the army had become commonplace. As the war went on, the ethnic unity declined; the Allies encouraged breakaway demands from minorities and the Empire faced disintegration. With apparent Allied victory approaching, nationalist movements seized ethnic resentment to erode social unity. The military breakdown of the Italian front marked the start of the rebellion for the numerous ethnicities who made up the multiethnic Empire, as they refused to keep on fighting for a cause that now appeared senseless. The Emperor had lost much of his power to rule, as his realm disintegrated.
On 14 October 1918, Foreign Minister Baron István Burián von Rajecz asked for an armistice based on President Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points and two days later Emperor Karl I issued a proclamation ("Imperial Manifesto of 16 October 1918") altering the empire into a federal union to give ethnic groups decentralization and representation. However, on 18 October, United States Secretary of State Robert Lansing replied that autonomy for the nationalities – the tenth of the Fourteen Points – was no longer enough. In fact, a Czechoslovak provisional government had joined the Allies on 14 October. The South Slavs in both halves of the monarchy had already declared in favor of uniting with Serbia in a large South Slav state in the 1917 Corfu Declaration signed by members of the Yugoslav Committee. The Croatians had begun disregarding orders from Budapest earlier in October. Lansing's response was, in effect, the death certificate of Austria–Hungary.
During the Italian battles, the Czechoslovaks and Southern Slavs declared their independence. With defeat in the war imminent after the Italian offensive in the Battle of Vittorio Veneto on 24 October, Czech politicians peacefully took over command in Prague on 28 October (later declared the birth of Czechoslovakia) and followed up in other major cities in the next few days. On 30 October, the Slovaks did the same. On 29 October, the Slavs in both portions of what remained of Austria–Hungary proclaimed the State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs and declared that their ultimate intention was to unite with Serbia and Montenegro in a large South Slav state. On the same day, the Czechs and Slovaks formally proclaimed the establishment of Czechoslovakia as an independent state.[citation needed]
On 17 October 1918, the Hungarian Parliament voted in favour of terminating the union with Austria. The most prominent opponent of continued union with Austria, Count Mihály Károlyi, seized power in the Aster Revolution on 31 October. Charles was all but forced to appoint Károlyi as his Hungarian prime minister. One of Károlyi's first acts was to formally repudiate the compromise agreement on 31 October, effectively terminating the personal union with Austria and thus officially dissolving the Austro-Hungarian state.
By the end of October, there was nothing left of the Habsburg realm but its majority-German Danubian and Alpine provinces, and Karl's authority was being challenged even there by the German-Austrian state council. Karl's last Austrian prime minister, Heinrich Lammasch, concluded that Karl's position was untenable. Lammasch persuaded Karl that the best course was to relinquish, at least temporarily, his right to exercise sovereign authority. On 11 November, Karl issued a carefully worded proclamation in which he recognized the Austrian people's right to determine the form of the state and "relinquish(ed) every participation" in Austrian state affairs. On the day after he announced his withdrawal from Austrian politics, the German-Austrian National Council proclaimed the Republic of German Austria. Károlyi followed suit on 16 November, proclaiming the Hungarian Democratic Republic.
Successor states
There were two legal successor states of the former Austro–Hungarian monarchy:
- German Austria (which became the Republic of Austria)
- Hungarian Democratic Republic (which after a few other short-lived intermediaries became the Kingdom of Hungary)
The 1919 Treaties of Saint-Germain-en-Laye (between the victors of World War I and Austria) and Trianon (between the victors and Hungary) regulated the new borders of Austria and Hungary, reducing them to small-sized and landlocked states. The Entente not only assumed without question that the minority peoples wished to leave Austria and Hungary, but allowed them to claim vast territories containing sizeable German- and Hungarian-speaking populations. With this in mind, in regard to areas without a decisive national majority, the Entente powers ruled in many cases in favour of the newly emancipated independent nation-states. The Republic of Austria lost roughly 60% of the old Austrian Empire's territory. It also had to drop its plans for union with Germany, as it was not allowed to unite with Germany without League approval.[citation needed] Hungary, however, was severely disrupted by the loss of 72% of its territory, 64% of its population and most of its natural resources. The Hungarian Democratic Republic was short-lived and was temporarily replaced by the communist Hungarian Soviet Republic. Romanian troops ousted Béla Kun and his communist government during the Hungarian–Romanian War of 1919.[citation needed]
In the summer of 1919, a Habsburg, Archduke Joseph August, became regent, but was forced to stand down after only two weeks when it became apparent the Allies would not recognise him. Finally, in March 1920, royal powers were entrusted to a regent, Miklós Horthy, who had been the last commanding admiral of the Austro-Hungarian Navy and had helped organize the counter-revolutionary forces. It was this government that signed the Treaty of Trianon under protest on 4 June 1920 at the Grand Trianon Palace in Versailles, France. The restored Kingdom of Hungary lost roughly 72% of the pre-war territory of the Kingdom of Hungary.
Habsburg banishment
Austria had passed the "Habsburg Law", which both dethroned the Habsburgs and banished all Habsburgs from Austrian territory. While Karl was banned from ever returning to Austria again, other Habsburgs could return if they gave up all claims to the defunct throne. In March and again in October 1921, ill-prepared attempts by Karl to regain the throne in Budapest collapsed. The initially wavering Horthy, after receiving threats of intervention from the Allied Powers and the Little Entente, refused his cooperation. Soon afterward, the Hungarian government nullified the Pragmatic Sanction, effectively dethroning the Habsburgs. Subsequently, the British took custody of Karl and removed him and his family to the Portuguese island of Madeira, where he died the following year.[citation needed]
Territorial legacy
Immediately after World War I
The following states were formed, re-established or expanded at the dissolution of the former Austro–Hungarian monarchy:
- German Austria (which became the Republic of Austria)
- First Hungarian Republic which became the Hungarian Soviet Republic, subsequently briefly restored and replaced by the Hungarian Republic, ultimately transformed into the Kingdom of Hungary
- First Czechoslovak Republic, later "Czechoslovakia"
- Second Polish Republic, contested by the short-lived proto-states of Tarnobrzeg Republic and Polish Soviet Socialist Republic
- State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs and the Kingdom of Serbia, both later absorbed into the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes
- Greater Romania
- Kingdom of Italy
- Republic of China (former Austro-Hungarian concession of Tianjin)
- the short-lived Ruthenian (Ukrainian and Rusyn) proto-states of West Ukrainian People's Republic (later absorbed into Ukrainian People's Republic), Hutsul Republic, Lemko Republic, Komancza Republic and the Galician Soviet Socialist Republic; all were ultimately absorbed mostly into Poland, but also into Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Romania and Yugoslavia.
The Principality of Liechtenstein, which had formerly looked to Vienna for protection and whose ruling house held sizable real estate in Cisleithania, formed a customs and defense union with Switzerland, and adopted the Swiss currency instead of the Austrian. In April 1919, Vorarlberg – the westernmost province of Austria – voted by a large majority to join Switzerland; however, both the Swiss and the Allies disregarded this result.
Present
 Cisleithania (Empire of Austria): 1. Bohemia, 2. Bukovina, 3. Carinthia, 4. Carniola, 5. Dalmatia, 6. Galicia, 7. Küstenland, 8. Lower Austria, 9. Moravia, 10. Salzburg, 11. Silesia, 12. Styria, 13. Tyrol, 14. Upper Austria, 15. Vorarlberg; Transleithania (Kingdom of Hungary): 16. Hungary proper 17. Croatia-Slavonia; 18. Bosnia and Herzegovina (Austro-Hungarian condominium) |
The following present-day countries and parts of countries were within the boundaries of Austria–Hungary when the empire was dissolved. Some other provinces of Europe had been part of the Habsburg monarchy at one time before 1867.
Empire of Austria (Cisleithania):
- Austria (except Burgenland without Sopron)
- Czech Republic (except the Hlučínsko area)
- Slovenia (except Prekmurje)
- Italy (Trentino, South Tyrol, parts of the province of Belluno and small portions of Friuli-Venezia Giulia)
- Croatia (Dalmatia, Istria)
- Poland (voivodeships of Lesser Poland, Subcarpathia, southernmost part of Silesia (Bielsko and Cieszyn))
- Ukraine (oblasts of Lviv, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ternopil (except its northern corner) and most of the oblast of Chernivtsi)
- Romania (county of Suceava)
- Montenegro (bay of Boka Kotorska, the coast and the immediate hinterland around the cities of Budva, Petrovac and Sutomore)
Kingdom of Hungary (Transleithania):
- Hungary
- Slovakia
- Austria (Burgenland except Sopron)
- Slovenia (Prekmurje)
- Croatia (Croatian Baranja and Međimurje county, Fiume as corpus separatum along with Slavonia and Central Croatia were not part of Hungary proper, the latter two were part of the sovereign Kingdom of Croatia-Slavonia)
- Ukraine (oblast of Zakarpattia)
- Romania (region of Transylvania, Partium and parts of Banat, Crișana, and Maramureș)
- Serbia (autonomous province of Vojvodina and northern Belgrade region)
- Poland (Polish parts of Orava and Spiš)
Austro-Hungarian Condominium
- Bosnia and Herzegovina (the villages of Zavalje, Mali Skočaj and Veliki Skočaj including the immediate surrounding area west of the city of Bihać)
- Montenegro (Sutorina – western part of the Municipality of Herceg Novi between present borders with Croatia (SW) and Bosnia and Herzegovina (NW), Adriatic coast (E) and the township of Igalo (NE))
- Sandžak-Raška region, Austro-Hungarian occupied 1878 until withdrawal in 1908 whilst formally part of the Ottoman Empire
- The Empire treated Bosnia-Herzegovina in much the same way the other powers treated their overseas colonies[175]
Other possessions of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy
- People's Republic of China (former Austro-Hungarian concession of Tianjin)
See also
- Aftermath of World War I
- Austrian nobility
- Corporative federalism, a form of administration adopted by the Austro-Hungarian Empire
- Diplomatic history of World War I
- Austro-Hungarian entry into World War I
- Ethnic composition of Austria–Hungary
- Former countries in Europe after 1815
- Hungarian nobility
- Lands of the Bohemian Crown (1867–1918)
- United States of Greater Austria
Notes
- Including 64–66% Latin and 10–12% Eastern
- Lutheran, Reformed, Unitarian
- German: Österreich-Ungarn [ˈøːstəʁaɪç ˈʊŋɡaʁn] , Hungarian: Ausztria–Magyarország [ˈɒustrijɒ ˈmɒɟɒrorsaːɡ]
- The concept of Eastern Europe is not firmly defined, and depending on the interpretation, some territories may be included or excluded from it; this holds for parts of Austria–Hungary as well, although the historical interpretation clearly places the monarchy in Central Europe.
- "The kingdom of Hungary desired equal status with the Austrian empire, which was weakened by its defeat in the German (Austro-Prussian) War of 1866. The Austrian emperor Francis Joseph gave Hungary full internal autonomy, together with a responsible ministry, and in return it agreed that the empire should still be a single great state for purposes of war and foreign affairs, thus maintaining its dynastic prestige abroad."
- From 45,5% to 50,4%.
- Bosnia-Herzegovina is excluded from these estimates.
References
- Citype – Internet – Portal Betriebsges.m.b.H.
- Fisher, Gilman. The Essentials of Geography for School Year 1888–1889, p. 47 Archived 6 May 2023 at the Wayback Machine. New England Publishing Company (Boston), 1888. Retrieved 20 August 2014.
- "Austria-Races". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. III (9th ed.). p. 118. Archived from the original on 5 March 2023. Retrieved 25 March 2022.
- From the Encyclopædia Britannica (1878), although this "Romani" refers to the language of those described by the EB as "Gypsies"; the EB's "Rumäni or Wallachian" refers to what is today known as Romanian; Rusyn and Ukrainian correspond to dialects of what the EB refers to as "Ruthenian"; and Yiddish was the common language of the Austrian Jews, although Hebrew was also known by many.
- Geographischer Atlas zur Vaterlandskunde, 1911, Tabelle 3.
- Headlam, James Wycliffe (1911). . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 3 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 2–39.
- Österreichische Statistik, Neue Folge (in German). Österreichische Nationalbibliothek. Archived from the original on 1 June 2023. Retrieved 13 September 2024.
- 1910. ÉVI NÉPSZÁMLÁLÁS 1. A népesség főbb adatai községek és népesebb puszták, telepek szerint (1912) | Könyvtár | Hungaricana (in Hungarian). Hungarian Central Statistical Office. 1912. p. 17. Archived from the original on 23 December 2023. Retrieved 13 September 2024.
- "Martin Mutschlechner: The Dual Monarchy: two states in a single empire". 6 June 2014. Archived from the original on 3 June 2023. Retrieved 6 May 2023.
- Schulze, Max-Stephan (1996). Engineering and Economic Growth: The Development of Austria–Hungary's Machine-Building Industry in the Late Nineteenth Century. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. p. 295.
- Andrássy, Gyula (1896). Az 1867-iki (i.e. ezernyolcszázhatvanhetediki) kiegyezésről. Franklin-Társulat. p. 321.
- Roman 2003, p. 401.
- Szávai, Ferenc Tibor. "Könyvszemle (Book review): Kozári Monika: A dualista rendszer (1867–1918): Modern magyar politikai rendszerek". Magyar Tudomány (in Hungarian). p. 1542. Archived from the original on 28 July 2013. Retrieved 20 July 2012.
- "Hungary - Dual Monarchy, Austro-Hungarian Empire, WWI | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Archived from the original on 16 May 2024. Retrieved 16 May 2024.
- Minahan 1998, p. 48.
- "Jayne, Kingsley Garland (1911). . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 4 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 279–286.
- Vajda, Stephan (1980). Felix Austria. Eine Geschichte Österreichs: Manuscript of Franz Joseph I. (in German). Vienna: Ueberreuter. ISBN 3-8000-3168-X.
- Philippoff, Eva (2002). L'Autriche-Hongorie: Politique et culture à travers les texts (1867–1918) [Die Doppelmonarchie Österreich-Ungarn. Ein politisches Lesebuch (1867–1918)] (in French). Villeneuve d'Ascq: Presses Univ. Septentrion. p. 60. ISBN 2-8593-9739-6. OL 3631159M.)
- Kotulla, Michael (17 August 2008). Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. ISBN 978-3-5404-8707-4.
- Kay, David (1878). . In Baynes, T. S. (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 3 (9th ed.). New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. pp. 116–141.
- Péter, László (2011). Hungary's Long Nineteenth Century: Constitutional and Democratic Traditions in a European Perspective. Leiden, the Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill. ISBN 978-9-0042-2421-6.
- Kann 1974; Sked 1989; Taylor 1964
- Kann 1974
- Lesaffer, Randall (2021). "The War of 1866 and the Undoing of Vienna". Oxford Public International Law. Archived from the original on 31 July 2021. Retrieved 31 July 2021.
- Schmitt, Hans A. (1968). "Count Beust and Germany, 1866–1870: Reconquest, Realignment, or Resignation?". Central European History. 1 (1): 20–34. doi:10.1017/S000893890001476X. ISSN 0008-9389. JSTOR 4545476. S2CID 144762108.
- Roider, Karl A.; Wagnleitner, Reinhold F.; Fellner, Fritz; Zöllner, Erich; Ray, Michael (28 November 2023). "History of Austria". Encyclopedia Britannica. Archived from the original on 8 April 2024. Retrieved 31 January 2024.
- Langer, William L. (1950). European Alliances and Alignments: 1871–1890 (2nd ed.). p. 20.
- Compromise of 1867, Encyclopædia Britannica, 2007
- Roman 2003, p. 401.
- The New Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopaedia Britannica. 2003. ISBN 978-0-8522-9961-6.
- Balázs, Éva H. (1997). Hungary and the Habsburgs, 1765–1800: An Experiment in Enlightened Absolutism. Central European University Press. p. 320. ISBN 978-9-6391-1603-0.
- Kronenbitter, Günther (2003). "Krieg im Frieden". Die Führung der k.u.k. Armee und die Großmachtpolitik Österreich-Ungarns 1906–1914 (in German). Munich: Verlag Oldenbourg. p. 150. ISBN 3-4865-6700-4.
- Taylor 1964
- Gábór 2010.
- Staatsgrundgesetz 1867.
- Headlam 1911, p. 39.
- Wank, Solomon; Jelavich, Barbara (1980). "The Impact of the Dual Alliance on the Germans in Austria and Vice-Versa". East Central Europe. 7 (2): 288–309. doi:10.1163/187633080X00202.
- Bideleux, Robert; Jeffries, Ian (1998). A History of Eastern Europe: Crisis and Change. Routledge. p. 366.
- Beniston, Judith; Vilain, Robert, eds. (2004). The Austrian Lyric. Maney Publishing for the Modern Humanities Research Association. p. 8. ISBN 978-1-9043-5040-8. Archived from the original on 14 November 2023. Retrieved 14 November 2023.
- Wierzbieniec, Wacław (28 December 2021), "Jewish Self-Government in Galicia, 1815–1914", Sources on Jewish Self-Government in the Polish Lands from Its Inception to the Present, Brill, pp. 283–351, ISBN 978-9-0045-0161-4, archived from the original on 4 June 2024, retrieved 30 June 2024
- "Charles University | Czech Republic, 14th Century, Faculty | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Archived from the original on 29 June 2024. Retrieved 30 June 2024.
- Budisavljević, Srđan, Stvaranje-Države-SHS, Creation of the state of SHS, Zagreb, 1958, p. 132–133.
- Nicoară, Vincențiu (1890). "Transilvania" (PDF). Asociația Transilvană Pentru Literatura Română și Cultura Poporului Român (in Romanian): 3–9. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
- Weigand, Gustav (1892). Romania. Recueil trimestriel consacré à l'étude des langes et des littératures romanes (in French). Émile Bouillon. pp. 240–256.
- Zbuchea, Gheorghe (1999). O istorie a Românilor din Peninsula Balcanică: secolul XVIII-XX (in Romanian). Bucharest: Biblioteca Bucureștilor. ISBN 978-9-7398-9188-2.
- Popovici, Iosif (1914). Dialectele române din Istria (in Romanian). Vol. 9. Halle an der Saale. pp. 21–32.
- Burada, Teodor (1896). O călătorie prin satele românești din Istria. Iași: Tipografia Națională. pp. 119–198. Archived from the original on 1 March 2021. Retrieved 7 September 2020.
- Spicijarić Paškvan, Nina (2014). "Vlachs from the Island Krk in the Primary Historical and Literature Sources". Studii și Cercetări – Actele Simpozionului "Banat – Istorie și Multiculturalitate" (in Croatian): 345–358.
- Vital, David (1999). A People Apart: A Political History of the Jews in Europe 1789–1939. Oxford University Press. p. 299. ISBN 978-0-1982-1980-4.
- Zacharia, Fareed (2003). The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad. Norton. p. 60.
- Rothenberg 1976, p. 118.
- Rothenberg 1976, p. 128.
- Wyman, David S.; Rosenzveig, Charles H. The World Reacts to the Holocaust. p. 474.
- Braham, Randolph L. The Politics of Genocide. p. 5.
- "Hungary – Social Changes". Countrystudies.us. Archived from the original on 14 October 2012. Retrieved 19 November 2013.
- László, Sebők (2012). "A magyarországi zsidók a számok tükrében" [The Jews in Hungary in the light of the numbers] (in Hungarian). Archived from the original on 20 February 2015.
- Karady, Victor; Nagy, Peter Tabor, eds. (2012). "The numerus clausus in Hungary" (PDF). p. 42. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
- Mühlberger, Kurt (27 February 2015). "The beginnings of the Alma Mater Rudolphina". 650 Plus. Archived from the original on 1 December 2022. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
- Strauss, Johann (7 July 2016). "7. Language and power in the late Ottoman Empire". In Murphey, Rhoads (ed.). Imperial Lineages and Legacies in the Eastern Mediterranean: Recording the Imprint of Roman, Byzantine and Ottoman Rule. Birmingham Byzantine and Ottoman Studies. Vol. 18. Routledge. p. 196. ISBN 978-1-3171-1844-2.
- "Miskolc and the University". Archived from the original on 1 March 2012. Retrieved 28 January 2014.
- "Budapesti Műszaki és Gazdaságtudományi Egyetem (Budapest University of Technology and Economics) — moveonnet". Archived from the original on 19 November 2012. Retrieved 11 June 2012.
- Kaplan, Robert B.; Richard B. Baldauf (2005). Language Planning and Policy in Europe. Multilingual Matters. p. 56. ISBN 978-1-8535-9811-1.
- Barcsay, Thomas (1991). "Banking in Hungarian Economic Development, 1867–1919" (PDF). Ryeson Polytechnical Institute. p. 216. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 November 2014. Retrieved 28 August 2016.
- Sugar & Hanak 1990, p. 262.
- Publishers' Association, Booksellers Association of Great Britain and Ireland (1930). The Publisher. Vol. 133. p. 355.
- Schulze, Max-Stephan (2000). "Patterns of growth and stagnation in the late nineteenth century Habsburg economy" (PDF). European Review of Economic History. 4 (3): 311–340, 337–338. doi:10.1017/S1361491600000095.
- Schulze 2005, p. 79.
- Good, David. The Economic Rise of the Habsburg Empire
- Schulze 1996, p. 80.
- Commercial Relations of the United States: Reports from the Consuls of the United States on the Commerce, Manufactures, Etc., of Their Consular Districts. Publisher: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1881 (page: 371)
- Davies, Norman (24 February 2005). God's Playground A History of Poland: Volume II: 1795 to the Present. Oxford University Press. pp. 106–108. ISBN 978-0-1992-5340-1.
- Berend, Iván T. (2013). Case Studies on Modern European Economy: Entrepreneurship, Inventions, and Institutions. Routledge. p. 151. ISBN 978-1-1359-1768-5.
- Fichtner 2009, p. 69.
- "Telegraph Vienna-Zagreb" (in Croatian). 28 September 2012. Archived from the original on 11 March 2016. Retrieved 11 March 2016.
- Kiesewetter, Herbert: Industrielle Revolution in Deutschland. Regionen als Wachstumsmotoren. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner 2004, ISBN 3-5150-8613-7, p. 246.
- "Telegráf – Lexikon". Kislexikon.hu. Archived from the original on 29 April 2014. Retrieved 25 March 2013.
- Dániel Szabó; Zoltán Fónagy; István Szathmári; Tünde Császtvay. "Kettős kötődés : Az Osztrák–Magyar Monarchia (1867–1918)". Archived from the original on 31 July 2013.
- Museum of Moslavina Kutina, Jasmina Uroda Kutlić: 'Telefon – čudo Novoga vijeka' (Telephone the miracle of Modern era)
- "125 godina telefonije u Hrvatskoj (125 years of Telephony in Croatia)" (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 11 March 2016. Retrieved 11 March 2016.
- HT Muzej (Croatian Telecom Museum): '125 godina telefonije u Hrvatskoj' (125 years of Telephony in Croatia), Zagreb 2006., P.-2,
- Telephone History Institute: Telecom History – Issue 1 – Page 14
- Thomas Derdak, Adéle Hast: International Directory of Company Histories – Volume 5 – Page 315
- Broadberry & O'Rourke 2010, p. 80.
- Brousek; Karl M.: Die Großindustrie Böhmens 1848–1918, München: Oldenbourg 1987, ISBN 978-3-4865-1871-9, p. 31.
- Mikulas Teich, Roy Porter, The Industrial Revolution in National Context: Europe and the USA, p. 266.
- Berend, Iván T. (2003). History Derailed: Central and Eastern Europe in the Long Nineteenth Century (in Hungarian). University of California Press. p. 152. ISBN 978-0-5202-3299-0.
- István Tisza and László Kovács: A magyar állami, magán- és helyiérdekű vasúttársaságok fejlődése 1876–1900 között, Magyar Vasúttörténet 2. kötet. Budapest: Közlekedési Dokumentációs Kft., 58–59, 83–84. o. ISBN 9-6355-2313-0 (1996)(English: The development of Hungarian private and state owned commuter railway companies between 1876 – 1900, Hungarian railway History Volume II.
- Tramways in Austria: Book: Buckley, Richard (2000). Tramways and Light Railways of Switzerland and Austria (2nd edition), pp. 129–135 ISBN 0-9481-0627-1.
- Tramways in Czech Republic: Book: Jan Vinař : Historické krovy (page 351)
- Tramways in Poland (including Galicia), Book: Arkadiusz Kołoś, Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Instytut Geografii i Gospodarki Przestrzennej: Rozwój przestrzenny a współczesne funkcjonowanie miejskiego transportu szynowego w Polsce (page: 19)
- History of Public Transport in Hungary. Book: Zsuzsa Frisnyák: A magyarországi közlekedés krónikája, 1750–2000
- Tramways in Croatia: Book: Vlado Puljiz, Gojko Bežovan, Teo Matković, dr. Zoran Šućur, Siniša Zrinščak: Socijalna politika Hrvatske
- "Trams and Tramways in Romania – Timișoara, Arad, Bucharest". beyondtheforest.com. Archived from the original on 20 September 2013. Retrieved 19 August 2013.
- Tramways in Slovakia: Book: Július Bartl: Slovak History: Chronology & Lexicon – p. 112
- Kogan Page: Europe Review 2003/2004, fifth edition, Wolden Publishing Ltd, 2003, page 174 Archived 14 August 2024 at the Wayback Machine
- "The History of BKV, Part 1". Bkv.hu. 22 November 1918. Archived from the original on 12 March 2013. Retrieved 25 March 2013.
- UNESCO World Heritage Centre. "UNESCO World Heritage Centre – World Heritage Committee Inscribes 9 New Sites on the World Heritage List". whc.unesco.org. Archived from the original on 28 November 2009. Retrieved 10 April 2013.
- "Budapest's Electric Underground Railway Is Still Running After More Than 120 Years". IEEE. 31 March 2020. Archived from the original on 19 March 2022. Retrieved 8 October 2021.
- Žmuc, Irena (2010). "Sustained Interest" (PDF). In Županek, Bernarda (ed.). Emona: Myth and Reality. Museum and Galleries of Ljubljana; City Museum of Ljubljana. p. 63. ISBN 978-9-6165-0920-6. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 November 2013. Retrieved 19 June 2012.
- Scott-Keltie, John (1919). The Statesman's Yearbook. Macmillan. p. 670.
- "Deutschlandfunk – Essay und Diskurs". Dradio.de. Archived from the original on 14 September 2011. Retrieved 11 September 2011.
- Swiggum 2008.
- "Baron Gautsch". Members.dame.at. 16 June 1908. Archived from the original on 30 August 2011. Retrieved 11 September 2011.
- "Österreichischer Lloyd". Aeiou.at. 31 July 2001. Archived from the original on 7 December 2011. Retrieved 11 September 2011.
- Wörthersee Schifffahrt.
- "DDSG Blue Danube GmbH". Ddsg-blue-danube.at. 13 November 2006. Archived from the original on 2 September 2011. Retrieved 11 September 2011.
- Scott-Keltie 1919, p. 683.
- Gunther Rothenburg, The Army of Francis Joseph (1976).
- One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Headlam, James Wycliffe (1911b). "Austria-Hungary". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 3 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 3.
- Headlam 1911b, p. 4.
- Wheatcroft, Andrew (28 April 2009). The Enemy at the Gate: Habsburgs, Ottomans and the Battle for Europe. Basic Books. p. 264. ISBN 978-0-7867-4454-1.
- Albrecht-Carrié 1973, chapter 6.
- "Austria". Britannica. Archived from the original on 13 March 2012. Retrieved 24 March 2012.
- Austria-Hungary - MSN Encarta.
- Albrecht-Carrié 1973, pp. 201–214.
- "The Austrian Occupation of Novibazar, 1878–1909". Mount HolyOak. Archived from the original on 19 January 2012. Retrieved 24 March 2012.
- Albrecht-Carrié 1973, chapter 8.
- Albrecht-Carrié 1973, p. 259–272.
- Gooch, 1936, pp 366–438.
- Wank 2020.
- Bridge 1972, pp. 338–339.
- Langer, European Alliances and Alignments: 1871–1890 pp. 138, 155–6, 163
- Finestone, Jeffrey; Massie, Robert K. (1981). The last courts of Europe. Dent. p. 247. ISBN 978-0-4600-4519-3.
- Smith, David James (2010). One Morning in Sarajevo. Hachette UK. ISBN 978-0-2978-5608-5.
He was photographed on the way to the station and the photograph has been reproduced many times in books and articles, claiming to depict the arrest of Gavrilo Princip. But there is no photograph of Gavro's arrest – this photograph shows the arrest of Behr.
- Djordjević, Dimitrije; Richard B. Spence (1992). Scholar, patriot, mentor: historical essays in honor of Dimitrije Djordjević. East European Monographs. p. 313. ISBN 978-0-8803-3217-0.
Following the assassination of Franz Ferdinand in June 1914, Catholic Croats and Muslims in Sarajevo joined forces in an anti-Serb pogrom.
- Reports Service: Southeast Europe series. American Universities Field Staff. 1964. p. 44. Archived from the original on 3 October 2023. Retrieved 7 December 2013.
... the assassination was followed by officially encouraged anti-Serb riots in Sarajevo ...
- Gioseffi, Daniela (1993). On Prejudice: A Global Perspective. Anchor Books. p. 246. ISBN 978-0-3854-6938-8. Retrieved 2 September 2013.
... Andric describes the "Sarajevo frenzy of hate" that erupted among Muslims, Catholics, and Orthodox believers following the assassination on June 28, 1914, of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo ...
- Mitrović, Andrej (2007). Serbia's Great War, 1914–1918. Purdue University Press. p. 19. ISBN 978-1-5575-3477-4.
- Tomasevich 2001, p. 485, The Bosnian wartime militia (Schutzkorps), which became known for its persecution of Serbs, was overwhelmingly Muslim..
- Schindler, John R. (2007). Unholy Terror: Bosnia, Al-Qa'ida, and the Rise of Global Jihad. Zenith Imprint. p. 29. ISBN 978-1-6167-3964-5.
- Kröll, Herbert (28 February 2008). Austrian-Greek encounters over the centuries: history, diplomacy, politics, arts, economics. Studienverlag. p. 55. ISBN 978-3-7065-4526-6.
... arrested and interned some 5.500 prominent Serbs and sentenced to death some 460 persons, a new Schutzkorps, an auxiliary militia, widened the anti-Serb repression.
- Ladislaus Count von Szögyény-Marich (Berlin) to Leopold Count von Berchtold (5 July 1914), in Ludwig Bittner, et al., eds., Österreich-Ungarns Aussenpolitik von der Bosnischen Krise 1908 bis zum Kriegsausbruch 1914 [Austria–Hungary's Foreign Policy prior to the Bosnian Crisis of 1908 up to the Outbreak of War in 1914]. 8 vols, Vienna, 1930, vol. 8, no. 10,058.
- "Primary Documents: Austrian Ultimatum to Serbia". 24 May 2003 [Originally published 23 July 1914]. Archived from the original on 30 October 2004. Retrieved 29 September 2019.
- Clark, Christopher (2013). The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914. pp. 420–430.
- Pribram, A. F. (1923). Austrian Foreign Policy, 1908–18. pp. 68–128.
- Zeman, Z.A.B. (Zbyněk Anthony Bohuslav) (1971). A Diplomatic History of the First World War. Weidenfeld and Nicolson. pp. 121–161. OL 5388162M.
- Stevenson, David (1988). The First World War and International Politics. pp. 139–148. OL 21170640M.
- Stevenson, David (1991). "The failure of peace by negotiation in 1917" (PDF). Historical Journal. 34 (1): 65–86. doi:10.1017/S0018246X00013935. S2CID 154930518. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 May 2023. Retrieved 9 May 2023.
- Keleher, Edward P. (1992). "Emperor Karl and the Sixtus Affair: Politico-Nationalist Repercussions in the Reich German and Austro-German Camps, and the Disintegration of Habsburg Austria, 1916–1918". East European Quarterly. 26 (2): 163ff.
- Schulze, Max-Stephan (2005). "Austria-Hungary's economy in World War I" (PDF). In Broadberry, Stephen; Harrison, Mark (eds.). The Economics of World War I. Cambridge University Press. p. 95. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511497339.002. ISBN 978-0-5218-5212-8. S2CID 16455027. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 September 2018. Retrieved 6 June 2018.
- Kann, Robert A.; et al., eds. (1977). The Habsburg Empire in World War I: Essays on the Intellectual, Military, Political and Economic Aspects of the Habsburg War Effort.
- Mowat, C.L. (Charles Loch) (1968). The New Cambridge Modern History. volume xii. (Cambridge University Press Archive)London: Cambridge University Press. p. 479. ISBN 978-0-5210-4551-3.
- Kappeler, Andreas (2014). The Russian Empire: A Multi-ethnic History. Routledge. p. 287. ISBN 978-1-3175-6810-0.
- Cirkovic, Sima M. (2008). The Serbs Volume 10 of The Peoples of Europe. John Wiley & Sons. p. 235. ISBN 978-1-4051-4291-5.
- Rotar, Marius (2013). History of Modern Cremation in Romania. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. p. 24. ISBN 978-1-4438-4542-7.
- Broadberry & O'Rourke 2010, p. 70.
- Stevenson, David (2011). With Our Backs to the Wall: Victory and Defeat in 1918. Harvard University Press. p. 399. ISBN 978-0-6740-6319-8.
- Healy, Maureen (2007). Vienna and the Fall of the Habsburg Empire: Total War and Everyday Life in World War I.
- Banac, Ivo (1992). "'Emperor Karl Has Become a Comitadji': The Croatian Disturbances of Autumn 1918". Slavonic and East European Review. 70 (2): 284–305.
- Tucker, Spencer (1996). The European Powers in the First World War. Taylor & Francis. p. 173. ISBN 978-0-8153-0399-2.
- Watson 2014.
- French forces occupy Corfu 2011.
- Burgwyn, H. James (1997). Italian foreign policy in the interwar period, 1918–1940. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 4. ISBN 978-0-2759-4877-1.
- Schindler, John R. (2001). Isonzo: The Forgotten Sacrifice of the Great War.
- Cavallaro, Gaetano V. (2010). The Beginning of Futility: Diplomatic, Political, Military and Naval Events on the Austro-Italian Front in the First World War 1914–1917. Vol. I. Xlibris Corporation. p. 339. ISBN 978-1-4010-8426-4.
- Lowry, Bullitt (2000). Armistice 1918. Kent State University Press. p. 112. ISBN 978-0-8733-8651-7. Archived from the original on 27 January 2024. Retrieved 19 November 2023.
- Torrey, Glenn E. (1998). Romania and World War I. Histria Books.
- Shanafelt, Gary W. (April 1999). "Review of Torrey, Glenn E., Romania and World War I: A Collection of Studies. HABSBURG". H-Net Reviews. Archived from the original on 5 March 2023. Retrieved 25 September 2019.
- See: 1910 census
- Buranbaeva, Oksana; Mladineo, Vanja (2011). Culture and Customs of Hungary, Cultures and Customs of the World. Bonn, Germany: ABC-CLIO. p. 32. ISBN 978-0-3133-8370-0.
- Bassett, Richard (2015). For God and Kaiser: The Imperial Austrian Army, 1619-1918. Yale University Press. p. 506. ISBN 978-0-3001-7858-6.
- Uyar, Mesut (2015). "Review of Austro-Hungarian War Aims in the Balkans during World War I". Reviews in History. doi:10.14296/RiH/2014/1846.
- Watson 2014, p. 536.
- Watson 2014, pp. 536–540.
- Nagy 2006.
- Giant, Tibor (October 1996). Through the Prism of the Habsburg Monarchy: Hungary in American Diplomacy and Public Opinion During the First World War (pdf thesis). University of Warwick. pp. 81–82. Archived from the original on 14 August 2024.
- Watson 2014, pp. 541–542.
- Cornelius, Deborah S. (2011). Hungary in World War II: Caught in the Cauldron. Fordham University Press. pp. 9–10. ISBN 978-0-8232-3343-4. Archived from the original on 10 November 2023. Retrieved 2 December 2023.
- Watson 2014, pp. 542–556.
- The 1918 Karl's proclamation Archived 8 March 2021 at the Wayback Machine. British Library.
- Stangl, Andrea (21 June 2014). "The successor states to the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy". habsburger.net. Archived from the original on 5 June 2023. Retrieved 3 March 2021.
- "Die amtliche Meldung über den Rücktritt" (in German). Neue Freie Presse, Morgenblatt. 24 August 1919. p. 2. Archived from the original on 26 December 2015. Retrieved 2 June 2017.
- "Trianon, Treaty of". The Columbia Encyclopedia. 2012. Archived from the original on 28 December 2008. Retrieved 28 August 2016.
- Tucker, Spencer; Priscilla Mary Roberts (2005). Encyclopedia of World War I (1st ed.). ABC-CLIO. p. 1183. ISBN 978-1-8510-9420-2.
Virtually the entire population of what remained of Hungary regarded the Treaty of Trianon as manifestly unfair, and agitation for revision began immediately
- Williamson 1991, p. 63, "Through the occupation Austria-Hungary became a colonial power.".
Sources
- Albrecht-Carrié, René (1973) [1958]. A Diplomatic History of Europe Since the Congress of Vienna (Revised ed.). Harper & Row. ISBN 0-0604-0171-0. OL 21992200M.
- "Austria-Hungary - MSN Encarta". 28 August 2009. Archived from the original on 28 August 2009.
- Bridge, Francis Roy (1972). From Sadowa to Sarajevo: the foreign policy of Austria-Hungary, 1866–1914. OL 22077590M.
- Broadberry, Stephen; O'Rourke, Kevin H. (2010). The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Europe: Volume 2, 1870 to the Present. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-1394-8951-5.
- Citype – Internet – Portal Betriebsges.m.b.H. "Austro-Hungarian Empire k.u.k. Monarchy dual-monarchic Habsburg Emperors of Austria". Wien-vienna.com. Archived from the original on 23 November 2011. Retrieved 11 September 2011.
- Fichtner, Paula Sutter (2009). Historical Dictionary of Austria. Historical Dictionaries of Europe (2nd ed.). ISBN 978-0-8108-5592-2.
- "January 11, 1916: French forces occupy Corfu". History.com. Archived from the original on 23 June 2011. Retrieved 11 September 2011 – via History.com This Day in History.
- Gábór, Ján (17–18 May 2010). "Slovakia – Hungary Relations in the European Union" (PDF). Suedosteuropa-gesellschaft.com. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 March 2012. Retrieved 19 November 2013.
- Kann, Robert A. (1974). A History of the Habsburg Empire: 1526–1918. University of California Press.; highly detailed history; emphasis on ethnicity
- Minahan, James (1998). Miniature Empires: A Historical Dictionary of the Newly Independent States. Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN 978-0-3133-0610-5. OL 489895W.
- Nagy, Miklós (6 September 2006). "Hungarian foreign ministers from 1848 to our days". Ministry for Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Hungary. Archived from the original on 21 June 2006. Retrieved 28 August 2016 – via Mfa.gov.hu.
- Roman, Eric (2003). Austria-Hungary & the Successor States: A Reference Guide from the Renaissance to the Present.
- Rothenberg, Gunther E. (1976), The Army of Francis Joseph, Purdue University Press
- Sked, Alan (1989). The Decline and Fall of the Habsburg Empire, 1815–1918. London: Longman.
- "Staatsgrundgesetz über die allgemeinen Rechte und Staatsbürger für die im Reichsrate vertretenen Königreiche und Länder" [Basic Law on the General Rights of Nationals of the Kingdoms and Länder represented in the Council of the Realm] (in German). 21 December 1867. Archived from the original on 12 June 2024. Retrieved 24 December 2024.
- Sugar, Peter F.; Hanak, Peter, eds. (1990). A History of Hungary.
- Swiggum, Sue (3 May 2008). "Unione Austriaca (Austro-Americana) / Cosulich Line". Theshipslist.com. Archived from the original on 1 October 2011. Retrieved 11 September 2011.
- Taylor, A.J.P. (1964). The Habsburg monarchy, 1809–1918: a history of the Austrian Empire and Austria–Hungary (2nd ed.). London: Penguin Books.; politics and diplomacy
- Tomasevich, Jozo (2001). War and Revolution in Yugoslavia: 1941–1945. Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-7924-1. Archived from the original on 17 February 2024. Retrieved 4 December 2013.
- Wank, Solomon (2020). In the Twilight of Empire. Count Alois Lexa von Aehrenthal (1854–1912): Imperial Habsburg Patriot and Statesman. Vol. 2: From Foreign Minister in Waiting to de facto Chancellor. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
- Watson, Alexander (2014). Ring of Steel: Germany and Austria–Hungary at War, 1914–1918. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-4650-9488-2.
- Williamson, Samuel R. (1991). Austria–Hungary and the Origins of the First World War. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-21163-0. ISBN 978-0-3334-2081-2.
- "Wörthersee Schifffahrt". Archived from the original on 28 March 2009. Retrieved 28 August 2016.
Further reading
- "Analysis: Austria's troubled history". BBC News. 3 February 2000. Archived from the original on 23 June 2011. Retrieved 19 August 2010.
- Armour, Ian D. (2009). "Apple of Discord: Austria-Hungary, Serbia and the Bosnian Question 1867-71". Slavonic and East European Review. 87 (4): 629–680. doi:10.1353/see.2009.0004. JSTOR 40650848. S2CID 151977197.
- Bagger, Eugene S. (1927). Francis Joseph: emperor of Austria — King of Hungary. OCLC 1149195550. OL 13524274M.
- Cipolla, Carlo M., ed. (1973). The Emergence of Industrial Societies vol 4 part 1. Glasgow: Fontana Economic History of Europe. pp. 228–278. online
- Brauneder, Wilhelm (2009). Österreichische Verfassungsgeschichte (in German) (11th ed.). Vienna: Manzsche Verlags- und Universitätsbuchhandlung. ISBN 978-3-2141-4876-8.
- Cornwall, Mark, ed. (2002). The Last Years of Austria–Hungary: Essays in political and military history, 1908–1918. University of Exeter Press. ISBN 0-8598-9563-7. OCLC 1150075157. OL 1313375M.
- Džaja, Srećko M. (1994). Bosnien-Herzegowina in der österreichisch-ungarischen Epoche 1878–1918 (in German). Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag. ISBN 3-4865-6079-4.
- Evans, R. J. W. (2008). Austria, Hungary, and the Habsburgs: Central Europe c.1683–1867. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199541621.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-1995-4162-1. OL 28444909M.
- Good, David. The Economic Rise of the Habsburg Empire (1984)
- Herman, Arthur. What Life Was Like: At Empire's End : Austro-Hungarian Empire 1848–1918 (Time Life, 2000)
- Hoke, Rudolf (1996). Österreichische und deutsche Rechtsgeschichte (in German) (2nd ed.). Vienna: Böhlau Studienbücher. ISBN 3-2059-8179-0.
- Jelavich, Barbara. Modern Austria: Empire and Republic, 1815–1986 (Cambridge University Press, 1987, pp. 72–150.
- Judson, Pieter M. (2016). The Habsburg Empire. pp. 264–436. doi:10.4159/9780674969346. ISBN 978-0-6749-6934-6. S2CID 167195732.
- Johnston, William M. The Austrian Mind: An Intellectual and Social History, 1848–1938 (University of California Press, 1972)
- Macartney, Carlile Aylmer The Habsburg Empire, 1790–1918, New York, Macmillan 1969.
- Mason, John W. The Dissolution of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, 1867–1918 (Routledge, 2014).
- May, Arthur J. The Hapsburg Monarchy 1867–1914 (Harvard University Press, 1951). online
- Milward, Alan, and S. B. Saul. The Development of the Economies of Continental Europe 1850–1914 (1977) pp. 271–331. online
- Mitchell, A. (2018). The Grand Strategy of the Habsburg Empire. doi:10.23943/9781400889969. ISBN 978-1-4008-8996-9. S2CID 239313989. Archived from the original on 9 June 2023. Retrieved 23 August 2020.
- Palmer, Alan. Twilight of the Habsburgs: The Life and Times of Emperor Francis Joseph. New York: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1995. ISBN 0-8711-3665-1
Pribram, Alfred Francis (1922). "Austrian Empire". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 30 (12th ed.). London & New York: The Encyclopædia Britannica Company. pp. 313–343.
- Redlich, Joseph. Emperor Francis Joseph Of Austria. New York: Macmillan, 1929. online free
- Rudolph, Richard L. Banking and industrialization in Austria-Hungary: the role of banks in the industrialization of the Czech crownlands, 1873–1914 (1976) online
- Sauer, Walter. "Habsburg Colonial: Austria-Hungary's Role in European Overseas Expansion Reconsidered", Austrian Studies (2012) 20:5–23 ONLINE Archived 5 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine
- Steed, Henry Wickham; et al. (1914). A Short History of Austria–Hungary and Poland. Encyclopaedia Britannica Company. p. 145.
- Tschuppik, Karl. The reign of the Emperor Fransis Joseph (1930) online
- Turnock, David. Eastern Europe: An Historical Geography: 1815–1945 (1989)
- Usher, Roland G. "Austro-German Relations Since 1866." American Historical Review 23.3 (1918): 577–595 online.
- Várdy, Steven, and Agnes Várdy. The Austro-Hungarian mind: at home and abroad (East European Monographs, 1989)
- Vermes, Gabor. "The Impact of the Dual Alliance on the Magyars of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy" East Central Europe (1980) vol 7 DOI: 10.1163/187633080x00211
- "Who's Who – Emperor Franz Josef I". First World War.com. Archived from the original on 10 May 2009. Retrieved 5 May 2009.
- Zovko, Ljubomir (2007). Studije iz pravne povijesti Bosne i Hercegovine: 1878 - 1941 (in Croatian). University of Mostar. ISBN 978-9-9589-2712-6.
World war
- Bassett, Richard. For God and Kaiser: The Imperial Austrian Army, 1619–1918 (2016)
- Boyer, John W. (2003). "Silent War and Bitter Peace: The Revolution of 1918 in Austria" (PDF). Austrian History Yearbook. 34: 1–56. doi:10.1017/S0067237800020427. S2CID 145716467. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 February 2020.
- Cornwall, Mark (1992). "News, Rumour and the Control of Information in Austria–Hungary, 1914–1918". History. 77 (249): 50–64. doi:10.1111/j.1468-229X.1992.tb02392.x.
- Cornwall, Mark (2000). The Undermining of Austria–Hungary. doi:10.1057/9780230286351. ISBN 978-1-3494-2240-1.
- Craig, Gordon A. (1965). "The World War I Alliance of the Central Powers in Retrospect: The Military Cohesion of the Alliance". The Journal of Modern History. 37 (3): 336–344. doi:10.1086/600693. JSTOR 1875406. S2CID 154381768.
- Crankshaw, Edward. The Fall of the House of Habsburg (Viking, 1963). pp. 449.
- Deak, John, and Jonathan E. Gumz. "How to Break a State: The Habsburg Monarchy's Internal War, 1914–1918" American Historical Review 122.4 (2017): 1105–1136. online Archived 16 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine
- Dedijer, Vladimir (1966). The Road to Sarajevo.
- Grátz, Gusztáv; Schüller, Richard (1928). The economic policy of Austria-Hungary during the war in its external relations. Yale University Press. OCLC 1065632. OL 6715012M.
- Healy, Maureen (2007). Vienna and the Fall of the Habsburg Empire: Total War and Everyday Life in World War I.
- Herweg, Holger H. (2009). The First World War: Germany and Austria–Hungary 1914–1918.
- Jászi, Oszkár (1966). The Dissolution of the Habsburg Monarchy. University of Chicago Press. online
- Jung, Peter (2003). The Austro-Hungarian Forces in World War I (2). Bloomsbury USA. ISBN 1-8417-6594-5.
- Kann, Robert A.; et al., eds. (1977). The Habsburg Empire in World War I: Essays on the Intellectual, Military, Political and Economic Aspects of the Habsburg War Effort. East European Quarterly. ISBN 0-9147-1016-8.
- Katzenstein, Peter J. (1976). Disjoined partners: Austria and Germany since 1815. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-5200-2945-3.
- Kapp, Richard W. (1984). "Divided Loyalties: The German Reich and Austria–Hungary in Austro-German Discussions of War Aims, 1914–1916". Central European History. 17 (2–3): 120–139. doi:10.1017/S0008938900016435. S2CID 96478651.
- Kronenbitter, Günther. "Pre-war Military Planning (Austria–Hungary)." online Archived 5 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine
- Rauchensteiner, Manfried (2014). The First World War and the End of the Habsburg Monarchy, 1914–1918. Wien/Köln/Weimar: Böhlau Verlag. ISBN 978-3-2057-9588-9.
- Sked, Alan. "Austria–Hungary and the First World War." Histoire@ Politique 1 (2014): 16–49. Online Archived 1 June 2022 at the Wayback Machine
- Tunstall, Graydon A. Austro-Hungarian Army and the First World War (Cambridge University Press 2021) online review Archived 12 December 2022 at the Wayback Machine
- Vermes, Gabor István Tisza: The Liberal Vision and Conservative Statecraft of a Magyar Nationalist (Columbia University Press, 1986); online review Archived 5 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine
- Wawro, Geoffrey (2014). A Mad Catastrophe: The Outbreak of World War I and the Collapse of the Habsburg Empire.
- Zametica, John (2017). Folly and malice: the Habsburg empire, the Balkans and the start of World War One. London: Shepheard–Walwyn. p. 416.
Primary sources
- Austro-Hungarian Monarchy. Austro-Hungarian red book. (1915) English translations of official documents to justify the war. online
- Baedeker, Karl (1906). "Austria–Hungary, Including Dalmatia and Bosnia. Handbook for Travellers". Bulletin of the American Geographical Society. 38 (3): 208. doi:10.2307/197930. hdl:2027/mdp.39015004037399. JSTOR 197930.
- Gooch, G. P. Recent Revelations of European Diplomacy (1940), pp. 103–159 summarizes memoirs of major participants
- Steed, Henry Wickham. The Hapsburg monarchy (1919) online detailed contemporary account
Historiography and memory
- Boyd, Kelly, ed. Encyclopedia of Historians and Historical Writers (Rutledge, 1999) 1:60–63, historiography
- Deak, John (2014). "The Great War and the Forgotten Realm: The Habsburg Monarchy and the First World War". The Journal of Modern History. 86 (2): 336–380. doi:10.1086/675880. S2CID 143481172.
- Körner, Axel. "Beyond Nation States: New Perspectives on the Habsburg Empire." European History Quarterly 48.3 (2018): 516–533. online Archived 5 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine
- Kożuchowski, Adam (2013). The Afterlife of Austria–Hungary. doi:10.2307/j.ctt7zw9vt. ISBN 978-0-8229-7917-3.
- Kwan, Jonathan (2011). "Review Article: Nationalism and all that: Reassessing the Habsburg Monarchy and its legacy". European History Quarterly. 41: 88–108. doi:10.1177/0265691410386424. S2CID 143745426. Archived from the original on 22 February 2023. Retrieved 26 May 2021.
- Sked, Alan. "Explaining the Habsburg Empire, 1830–90." in Pamela Pilbeam, ed., Themes in Modern European History 1830–1890 (Routledge, 2002) pp. 141–176.
- Sked, Alan. "Austria–Hungary and the First World War." Histoire Politique 1 (2014): 16–49. online free Archived 31 August 2018 at the Wayback Machine historiography
In German
- Geographischer Atlas zur Vaterlandskunde an der österreichischen Mittelschulen. (ed.: Rudolf Rothaug), K. u. k. Hof-Kartographische Anstalt G. Freytag & Berndt, Vienna, 1911.
External links
- Articles relating to Austria–Hungary at the International Encyclopedia of the First World War.
- Habsburg Empire Austrian line
- Microsoft Encarta: The height of the dual monarchy (Archived 31 October 2009)
- The Austro-Hungarian Military
- Heraldry of the Austro-Hungarian Empire
- Austria–Hungary at the Wayback Machine (archived 12 January 2008) – extensive list of heads of state, ministers, and ambassadors
- History of Austro-Hungarian currency
- Austria–Hungary, Dual Monarchy
- Map of Europe and the collapse of Austria–Hungary at omniatlas.com
- Mangham, Arthur Neal. The Social Bases of Austrian Politics: The German Electoral Districts of Cisleithania, 1900–1914. Ph.D. thesis 1974
- Austro-Hungarian Land Forces 1848–1918 Archived 28 May 2014 at the Wayback Machine
- Oldphoto.info – Austro-Hungarian Imperial and Royal Army
- HABSBURG is an email discussion list dealing with the culture and history of the Habsburg monarchy and its successor states in central Europe since 1500, with discussions, syllabi, book reviews, queries, conferences; edited daily by scholars since 1994
Austria Hungary also referred to as the Austro Hungarian Empire the Dual Monarchy or the Habsburg Monarchy was a multi national constitutional monarchy in Central Europe between 1867 and 1918 A military and diplomatic alliance it consisted of two sovereign states with a single monarch who was titled both Emperor of Austria and King of Hungary Austria Hungary constituted the last phase in the constitutional evolution of the Habsburg monarchy it was formed with the Austro Hungarian Compromise of 1867 in the aftermath of the Austro Prussian War following wars of independence by Hungary in opposition to Habsburg rule It was dissolved shortly after Hungary terminated the union with Austria in 1918 Austro Hungarian MonarchyOsterreichisch Ungarische Monarchie German Osztrak Magyar Monarchia Hungarian 1867 1918Coat of arms 1915 1918 see also Flags of Austria Hungary Motto Indivisibiliter ac inseparabiliter Latin for Indivisibly and inseparably Anthem Gott erhalte Gott beschutze English God preserve God protect source source track track track track track Austria Hungary in 1914 on the eve of World War I Cisleithania or Austria Lands of the Crown of Saint Stephen or Hungary Condominium of Bosnia Herzegovina Austria Hungary and the Condominium 1908 CapitalVienna Austria Budapest Hungary Largest cityViennaOfficial languagesGerman Hungarian Croatian Croatia Slavonia Common languagesGerman Hungarian Croatian Czech Polish Ruthenian Romanian Bosnian Serbian Slovak Slovene Italian Romani Carpathian Yiddish and others Friulian Istro Romanian Istriot Ladin Religion 1910 76 6 Catholic8 9 Protestant8 7 Eastern Orthodox4 4 Jewish1 3 MuslimDemonym s Austro HungarianGovernmentConstitutional monarchyEmperor King Emperor of Austria King of Hungary 1867 1916Franz Joseph I 1916 1918Karl I amp IVMinister President of Austria 1867 first F F von Beust 1918 last Heinrich LammaschPrime Minister of Hungary 1867 1871 first Gyula Andrassy 1918 last Mihaly KarolyiLegislatureTwo national legislatures Imperial CouncilHouse of LordsHouse of Deputies Diet of HungaryHouse of MagnatesHouse of RepresentativesHistorical eraNew ImperialismWorld War I 1867 Compromise30 March 1867 Dual Alliance7 October 1879 Bosnian Crisis6 October 1908 July Crisis28 June 1914 Invasion of Serbia28 July 1914 Empire dissolved31 October 1918 Austrian Republic12 November 1918 Hungarian Republic16 November 1918 Treaty of Saint Germain10 September 1919 Treaty of Trianon4 June 1920Area1905621 538 km2 239 977 sq mi Population 1910 estimate51 390 223CurrencyGulden florin 1867 1892 Krone 1892 1918 Preceded by Succeeded byAustrian Empire Legal successors AustriaHungaryOther territorial successors CzechoslovakiaPolandWest UkraineYugoslaviaRomaniaItaly One of Europe s major powers Austria Hungary was geographically the second largest country in Europe and the third most populous after Russia and the German Empire while being among the ten most populous countries worldwide The Empire built up the fourth largest machine building industry in the world With the exception of the territory of the Bosnian Condominium the Empire of Austria and the Kingdom of Hungary were separate sovereign countries in international law At its core was the dual monarchy which was a real union between Cisleithania the northern and western parts of the former Austrian Empire and Transleithania Kingdom of Hungary Following the 1867 reforms the Austrian and Hungarian states were co equal in power The two countries conducted unified diplomatic and defence policies For these purposes common ministries of foreign affairs and defence were maintained under the monarch s direct authority as was a third finance ministry responsible only for financing the two common portfolios A third component of the union was the Kingdom of Croatia Slavonia an autonomous region under the Hungarian crown which negotiated the Croatian Hungarian Settlement in 1868 After 1878 Bosnia and Herzegovina came under Austro Hungarian joint military and civilian rule until it was fully annexed in 1908 provoking the Bosnian crisis Austria Hungary was one of the Central Powers in World War I which began with an Austro Hungarian war declaration on the Kingdom of Serbia on 28 July 1914 It was already effectively dissolved by the time the military authorities signed the armistice of Villa Giusti on 3 November 1918 The Kingdom of Hungary and the First Austrian Republic were treated as its successors de jure whereas the independence of the First Czechoslovak Republic the Second Polish Republic and the Kingdom of Yugoslavia respectively and most of the territorial demands of the Kingdom of Romania and the Kingdom of Italy were also recognized by the victorious powers in 1920 Name and terminologySilver coin 5 corona 1908 the bust of Franz Joseph I facing right surrounded by the legend Franciscus Iosephus I Dei gratia imperator Austriae rex Bohemiae Galiciae Illyriae et cetera et apostolicus rex Hungariae The realm s official name was the Austro Hungarian Monarchy German Osterreichisch Ungarische Monarchie IPA ˈoːsteʁaɪcɪʃ ˈʊŋɡaʁɪʃe monaʁˈciː Hungarian Osztrak Magyar Monarchia IPA ˈostraːk ˈmɒɟɒr ˈmonɒrɦijɒ though in international relations Austria Hungary was used German Osterreich Ungarn Hungarian Ausztria Magyarorszag The Austrians also used the names k u k Monarchie English k u k monarchy in detail German Kaiserliche und konigliche Monarchie Osterreich Ungarn Hungarian Csaszari es Kiralyi Osztrak Magyar Monarchia and Danubian Monarchy German Donaumonarchie Hungarian Dunai Monarchia or Dual Monarchy German Doppel Monarchie Hungarian Dual Monarchia and The Double Eagle German Der Doppel Adler Hungarian Ketsas but none of these became widespread either in Hungary or elsewhere The realm s full name used in internal administration was The Kingdoms and Lands Represented in the Imperial Council and the Lands of the Holy Hungarian Crown of St Stephen German Die im Reichsrat vertretenen Konigreiche und Lander und die Lander der Heiligen Ungarischen Stephanskrone Hungarian A Birodalmi Tanacsban kepviselt kiralysagok es orszagok es a Magyar Szent Korona orszagai From 1867 onwards the abbreviations heading the names of official institutions in Austria Hungary reflected their responsibility k u k kaiserlich und koniglich or Imperial and Royal was the label for institutions common to both parts of the monarchy e g the k u k Kriegsmarine Navy and during the war the k u k Armee Army The common army changed its label from k k to k u k only in 1889 at the request of the Hungarian government K k kaiserlich koniglich or Imperial Royal was the term for institutions of Cisleithania Austria royal in this label referred to the Crown of Bohemia K u koniglich ungarisch or M k Magyar kiralyi Royal Hungarian referred to Transleithania the lands of the Hungarian crown In the Kingdom of Croatia and Slavonia the autonomous institutions used k kraljevski Royal since according to the Croatian Hungarian Settlement the only official language in Croatia and Slavonia was Croatian and the institutions were only Croatian Following a decision of Franz Joseph I in 1868 the realm bore the official name Austro Hungarian Monarchy Realm German Osterreichisch Ungarische Monarchie Reich Hungarian Osztrak Magyar Monarchia Birodalom in its international relations It was often contracted to the Dual Monarchy in English or simply referred to as Austria Background and establishmentFollowing Hungary s defeat against the Ottoman Empire in the Battle of Mohacs of 1526 the Habsburg Empire became more involved in the Kingdom of Hungary and subsequently assumed the Hungarian throne However as the Ottomans expanded further into Hungary the Habsburgs came to control only a small north western portion of the former kingdom s territory Eventually following the Treaty of Passarowitz in 1718 all former territories of the Hungarian kingdom were ceded from the Ottomans to the Habsburgs In the revolutions of 1848 the Kingdom of Hungary called for greater self government and later even independence from the Austrian Empire The ensuing Hungarian Revolution of 1848 was crushed by the Austrian military with Russian military assistance and the level of autonomy that the Hungarian state had enjoyed was replaced with absolutist rule from Vienna This further increased Hungarian resentment of the Habsburg dominion citation needed In the 1860s the Empire faced two severe defeats its loss in the Second Italian War of Independence broke its dominion over a large part of Northern Italy Lombardy Veneto Modena Reggio Tuscany Parma and Piacenza while defeat in the Austro Prussian War of 1866 led to the dissolution of the German Confederation of which the Habsburg emperor was the hereditary president and the exclusion of Austria from German affairs These twin defeats gave the Hungarians the opportunity to remove the shackles of absolutist rule citation needed Realizing the need to compromise with Hungary in order to retain its great power status the central government in Vienna began negotiations with the Hungarian political leaders led by Ferenc Deak The Hungarians maintained that the April Laws were still valid but conceded that under the Pragmatic Sanction of 1713 foreign affairs and defence were common to Austria and Hungary On 20 March 1867 the newly re established Hungarian parliament at Pest started to negotiate the new laws to be accepted on 30 March However Hungarian leaders received word that the Emperor s formal coronation as King of Hungary on 8 June had to have taken place in order for the laws to be enacted within the lands of the Holy Crown of Hungary On 28 July Franz Joseph in his new capacity as King of Hungary approved and promulgated the new laws which officially gave birth to the Dual Monarchy 1866 1878 beyond Lesser Germany Bosnian Muslim resistance during the battle of Sarajevo in 1878 against the Austro Hungarian occupation The Austro Prussian War was ended by the Peace of Prague 1866 which settled the German question in favor of a Lesser German Solution Count Friedrich Ferdinand von Beust who was the foreign minister from 1866 to 1871 hated the Prussian chancellor Otto von Bismarck who had repeatedly outmaneuvered him Beust looked to France for avenging Austria s defeat and attempted to negotiate with Emperor Napoleon III of France and Italy for an anti Prussian alliance but no terms could be reached The decisive victory of the Prusso German armies in the Franco Prussian war and the subsequent founding of the German Empire ended all hope of re establishing Austrian influence in Germany and Beust retired After being forced out of Germany and Italy the Dual Monarchy turned to the Balkans which were in tumult as nationalistic movements were gaining strength and demanding independence Both Russia and Austria Hungary saw an opportunity to expand in this region Russia took on the role of protector of Slavs and Orthodox Christians Austria envisioned a multi ethnic religiously diverse empire under Vienna s control Count Gyula Andrassy a Hungarian who was Foreign Minister 1871 1879 made the centerpiece of his policy one of opposition to Russian expansion in the Balkans and blocking Serbian ambitions to dominate a new South Slav federation He wanted Germany to ally with Austria not Russia GovernmentHungarian Parliament buildingAustrian Parliament building The Compromise of 1867 turned the Habsburg domains into a real union between the Austrian Empire Lands Represented in the Imperial Council or Cisleithania in the western and northern half and the Kingdom of Hungary Lands of the Crown of Saint Stephen or Transleithania in the eastern half The government of Austria which had ruled the monarchy until 1867 became the government of the Austrian part and another government was formed for the Hungarian part The common government officially designated Ministerial Council for Common Affairs or Ministerrat fur gemeinsame Angelegenheiten in German formed for the few matters of common national security the Common Army Navy foreign policy and the imperial household and the customs union Although the two halves shared a common monarch and both foreign relations and defense were managed jointly all other state functions were to be handled separately as there was no common citizenship Hungary and Austria maintained separate parliaments each with its own prime minister the Diet of Hungary commonly known as the National Assembly and the Imperial Council German Reichsrat in Cisleithania Each parliament had its own executive government appointed by the monarch After 1878 Bosnia and Herzegovina came under Austro Hungarian military and civilian rule until it was fully annexed in 1908 provoking the Bosnian crisis with the Great Powers and Austria Hungary s Balkan neighbors Serbia and Montenegro Relations during the half century after 1867 between the two parts of the dual monarchy featured repeated disputes over shared external tariff arrangements and over the financial contribution of each government to the common treasury These matters were determined by the Austro Hungarian Compromise of 1867 in which common expenditures were allocated 70 to Austria and 30 to Hungary This division had to be renegotiated every ten years There was political turmoil during the build up to each renewal of the agreement By 1907 the Hungarian share had risen to 36 4 The disputes culminated in the early 1900s in a prolonged constitutional crisis It was triggered by disagreement over which language to use for command in Hungarian army units and deepened by the advent to power in Budapest in April 1906 of a Hungarian nationalist coalition Provisional renewals of the common arrangements occurred in October 1907 and in November 1917 on the basis of the status quo The negotiations in 1917 ended with the dissolution of the Dual Monarchy DemographicsEthno linguistic map of Austria Hungary 1910Meyers Konversations Lexikon ethnographic map of Austria Hungary 1885 In July 1849 the Hungarian Revolutionary Parliament proclaimed and enacted ethnic and minority rights the next such laws were in Switzerland but these were overturned after the Russian and Austrian armies crushed the Hungarian Revolution After the Kingdom of Hungary reached the Compromise with the Habsburg Dynasty in 1867 one of the first acts of its restored Parliament was to pass a Law on Nationalities Act Number XLIV of 1868 It was a liberal piece of legislation and offered extensive language and cultural rights It did not recognize non Hungarians to have rights to form states with any territorial autonomy Article 19 of the 1867 Basic State Act Staatsgrundgesetz valid only for the Cisleithanian Austrian part of Austria Hungary said All races of the empire have equal rights and every race has an inviolable right to the preservation and use of its own nationality and language The equality of all customary languages landesubliche Sprachen in school office and public life is recognized by the state In those territories in which several races dwell the public and educational institutions are to be so arranged that without applying compulsion to learn a second country language Landessprache each of the races receives the necessary means of education in its own language The implementation of this principle led to several disputes as it was not clear which languages could be regarded as customary The Germans the traditional bureaucratic capitalist and cultural elite demanded the recognition of their language as a customary language in every part of the empire German nationalists especially in the Sudetenland part of Bohemia looked to Berlin in the new German Empire The Hungarian Minority Act of 1868 gave the minorities Slovaks Romanians Serbs et al individual but not also communal rights to use their language in offices schools although in practice often only in those founded by them and not by the state courts and municipalities if 20 of the deputies demanded it Beginning with the 1879 Primary Education Act and the 1883 Secondary Education Act the Hungarian state made more efforts to reduce the use of non Magyar languages in strong violation of the 1868 Nationalities Law After 1875 all Slovak language schools higher than elementary were closed including the only three high schools gymnasiums in Revuca Nagyroce Turciansky Svaty Martin Turocszentmarton and Klastor pod Znievom Zniovaralja Language was as a proxy for ethnicity one of the most contentious issues in Austro Hungarian politics All governments faced difficult and divisive hurdles in deciding on the languages of government and of instruction The minorities sought the widest opportunities for education in their own languages as well as in the dominant languages Hungarian and German By the Ordinance of 5 April 1897 the Austrian Prime Minister Count Kasimir Felix Badeni gave Czech equal standing with German in the internal government of Bohemia this led to a crisis because of nationalist German agitation throughout the empire The Crown dismissed Badeni Physical map of Austria Hungary in 1914 Italian was regarded as an old culture language Kultursprache by German intellectuals and had always been granted equal rights as an official language of the Empire but the Germans had difficulty in accepting the Slavic languages as equal to their own On one occasion Count A Auersperg Anastasius Grun entered the Diet of Carniola carrying what he claimed to be the whole corpus of Slovene literature under his arm this was to demonstrate that the Slovene language could not be substituted for German as the language of higher education The following years saw official recognition of several languages at least in Austria Since 1867 laws awarded Croatian equal status with Italian in Dalmatia Beginning in 1882 there was a Slovene majority in the Diet of Carniola and in the capital Laibach Ljubljana they replaced German with Slovene as their primary official language Galicia designated Polish instead of German in 1869 as the customary language of government As of June 1907 all public and private schools in Hungary were obliged to ensure that after the fourth grade the pupils could express themselves fluently in Hungarian This led to the further closing of minority schools devoted mostly to the Slovak and Rusyn languages The two kingdoms sometimes divided their spheres of influence According to Misha Glenny in his book The Balkans 1804 1999 the Austrians responded to Hungarian support of Czechs by supporting the Croatian national movement in Zagreb In recognition that he reigned in a multi ethnic country Emperor Franz Joseph spoke and used German Hungarian and Czech fluently and Croatian Serbian Polish and Italian to some degree The language disputes were most fiercely fought in Bohemia where the Czech speakers formed a majority and sought equal status for their language to German The Czechs had lived primarily in Bohemia since the 6th century and German immigrants had begun settling the Bohemian periphery in the 13th century The constitution of 1627 made the German language a second official language and equal to Czech German speakers lost their majority in the Bohemian Diet in 1880 and became a minority to Czech speakers in the cities of Prague and Pilsen while retaining a slight numerical majority in the city of Brno Brunn The old Charles University in Prague hitherto dominated by German speakers was divided into German and Czech speaking faculties in 1882 At the same time Hungarian dominance faced challenges from the local majorities of Romanians in Transylvania and in the eastern Banat Slovaks in today s Slovakia and Croats and Serbs in the crown lands of Croatia and of Dalmatia today s Croatia in Bosnia and Herzegovina and in the provinces known as the Vojvodina today s northern Serbia The Romanians and the Serbs began to agitate for union with their fellow nationalists and language speakers in the newly founded states of Romania 1859 1878 and Serbia citation needed Hungary s leaders were generally less willing than their Austrian counterparts to share power with their subject minorities but they granted a large measure of autonomy to Croatia in 1868 To some extent they modeled their relationship to that kingdom on their own compromise with Austria of the previous year In spite of nominal autonomy the Croatian government was an economic and administrative part of Hungary which the Croatians resented In the Kingdom of Croatia Slavonia and Bosnia and Herzegovina many advocated the idea of a trialist Austro Hungaro Croatian monarchy among the supporters of the idea were Archduke Leopold Salvator Archduke Franz Ferdinand and emperor and king Charles I who during his short reign supported the trialist idea only to be vetoed by the Hungarian government and Count Istvan Tisza The count finally signed the trialist proclamation after heavy pressure from the king on 23 October 1918 Ethnic relations In Istria the Istro Romanians a small ethnic group composed by around 2 600 people in the 1880s suffered severe discrimination The Croats of the region who formed the majority tried to assimilate them while the Italian minority supported them in their requests for self determination In 1888 the possibility of opening the first school for the Istro Romanians teaching in the Romanian language was discussed in the Diet of Istria The proposal was very popular among them The Italian deputies showed their support but the Croat ones opposed it and tried to show that the Istro Romanians were in fact Slavs During Austro Hungarian rule the Istro Romanians lived under poverty conditions and those living in the island of Krk were fully assimilated by 1875 Romantic style Great Synagogue in Pecs built by the Neolog Jewish community in 1869Orthodox Jews from Galicia in Leopoldstadt Vienna 1915 Around 1900 Jews numbered about two million in the whole territory of the Austro Hungarian Empire their position was ambiguous The populist and antisemitic politics of the Christian Social Party are sometimes viewed as a model for Adolf Hitler s Nazism Antisemitic parties and movements existed but the governments of Vienna and Budapest did not initiate pogroms or implement official antisemitic policies citation needed They feared that such ethnic violence could ignite other ethnic minorities and escalate out of control The antisemitic parties remained on the periphery of the political sphere due to their low popularity among voters in the parliamentary elections citation needed In that period the majority of Jews in Austria Hungary lived in small towns shtetls in Galicia and rural areas in Hungary and Bohemia however they had large communities and even local majorities in the downtown districts of Vienna Budapest Prague Krakow and Lwow Of the pre World War I military forces of the major European powers the Austro Hungarian army was almost alone in its regular promotion of Jews to positions of command While the Jewish population of the lands of the Dual Monarchy was about 5 Jews made up nearly 18 of the reserve officer corps Thanks to the modernity of the constitution and to the benevolence of emperor Franz Joseph the Austrian Jews came to regard the era of Austria Hungary as a golden era of their history By 1910 about 900 000 religious clarification needed Jews made up approximately 5 of the population of Hungary and about 23 of Budapest s citizenry In the Austro Hungarian Empire the generally fiercely patriotic Hungarian Jews were securing the tenuous Hungarian majority in the Kingdom of Hungary Jews accounted for 54 of commercial business owners 85 of financial institution directors and owners in banking and 62 of all employees in commerce 20 of all general grammar school students and 37 of all commercial scientific grammar school students 31 9 of all engineering students and 34 1 of all students in human faculties of the universities Jews accounted for 48 5 of all physicians and 49 4 of all lawyers jurists in Hungary Note The numbers of Jews were reconstructed from religious censuses They did not include the people of Jewish origin who had converted to Christianity or the number of atheists citation needed Among many Hungarian parliament members of Jewish origin the most famous Jewish members in Hungarian political life were Vilmos Vazsonyi as Minister of Justice Samu Hazai as Minister of War Janos Teleszky as minister of finance as minister of trade and as minister of trade EducationThis section needs additional citations for verification Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section Unsourced material may be challenged and removed Find sources Austria Hungary news newspapers books scholar JSTOR April 2023 Learn how and when to remove this message Universities in Cisleithania Literacy in Austria Hungary census 1880 The first university in the Austrian half of the Empire Charles University was founded by Emperor Charles IV in Prague in 1347 the second oldest university was the Jagiellonian University established in Krakow by the King of Poland Casimir III the Great in 1364 while the third oldest University of Vienna was founded by Duke Rudolph IV in 1365 The higher educational institutions were predominantly German but beginning in the 1870s language shifts began to occur These establishments which in the middle of the 19th century had had a predominantly German character underwent in Galicia a conversion into Polish national institutions in Bohemia and Moravia a separation into German and Czech ones Thus Germans Czechs and Poles were provided for But now the smaller nations also made their voices heard the Ruthenians Slovenes and Italians The Ruthenians demanded at first in view of the predominantly Ruthenian character of rural East Galicia a national partition of the Polish University of Lwow Since the Poles were at first unyielding Ruthenian demonstrations and strikes of students arose and the Ruthenians were no longer content with the reversion of a few separate professorial chairs and with parallel courses of lectures By a pact concluded on 28 January 1914 the Poles promised a Ruthenian university but owing to the war the question lapsed The Italians could hardly claim a university of their own on grounds of population in 1910 they numbered 783 000 but they claimed it all the more on grounds of their ancient culture All parties were agreed that an Italian faculty of laws should be created the difficulty lay in the choice of the place The Italians demanded Trieste but the Government was afraid to let this Adriatic port become the centre of an irredenta moreover the Southern Slavs of the city wished it kept free from an Italian educational establishment Bienerth in 1910 brought about a compromise namely that it should be founded at once the situation to be provisionally in Vienna and to be transferred within four years to Italian national territory The German National Union Nationalverband agreed to extend temporary hospitality to the Italian university in Vienna but the Southern Slav Hochschule Club demanded a guarantee that a later transfer to the coast provinces should not be contemplated together with the simultaneous foundation of Slovene professorial chairs in Prague and Cracow and preliminary steps towards the foundation of a Southern Slav university in Laibach But in spite of the constant renewal of negotiations for a compromise it was impossible to arrive at any agreement until the outbreak of war left all the projects for a Ruthenian university at Lemberg a Slovene one in Laibach and a second Czech one in Moravia unrealized Universities in Transleithania Literacy in Hungary by counties in 1910 excluding Croatia In the year 1276 the university of Veszprem was destroyed by the troops of Peter Csak and it was never rebuilt A university was established by Louis I of Hungary in Pecs in 1367 Sigismund established a university at obuda in 1395 Another Universitas Istropolitana was established 1465 in Pozsony now Bratislava in Slovakia by Mattias Corvinus None of these medieval universities survived the Ottoman wars Nagyszombat University was founded in 1635 and moved to Buda in 1777 and it is called Eotvos Lorand University today The world s first institute of technology was founded in Selmecbanya Kingdom of Hungary since 1920 Banska Stiavnica now Slovakia in 1735 Its legal successor is the University of Miskolc in Hungary The Budapest University of Technology and Economics BME is considered the oldest institute of technology in the world with university rank and structure Its legal predecessor the Institutum Geometrico Hydrotechnicum was founded in 1782 by Emperor Joseph II The high schools included the universities of which Hungary possessed five all maintained by the state at Budapest founded in 1635 at Kolozsvar founded in 1872 and at Zagreb founded in 1874 Newer universities were established in Debrecen in 1912 and Pozsony university was reestablished after a half millennium in 1912 They had four faculties theology law philosophy and medicine the university at Zagreb was without a faculty of medicine There were in addition ten high schools of law called academies which in 1900 were attended by 1 569 pupils The Polytechnicum in Budapest founded in 1844 which contained four faculties and was attended in 1900 by 1 772 pupils was also considered a high school There were in Hungary in 1900 forty nine theological colleges twenty nine Catholic five Greek Uniat four Greek Orthodox ten Protestant and one Jewish Among special schools the principal mining schools were at Selmeczbanya Nagyag and Felsobanya the principal agricultural colleges at Debreczen and Kolozsvar and there was a school of forestry at Selmeczbanya military colleges at Budapest Kassa Deva and Zagreb and a naval school at Fiume There were in addition a number of training institutes for teachers and a large number of schools of commerce several art schools for design painting sculpture and music citation needed Literacy in Kingdom of Hungary incl male and female Major nationalities in Hungary Rate of literacy in 1910German 70 7 Hungarian 67 1 Croatian 62 5 Slovak 58 1 Serbian 51 3 Romanian 28 2 Ruthenian 22 2 EconomyA 20 crown banknote of the Dual Monarchy using all official and recognized languages the reverse side was Hungarian Black Friday 9 May 1873 Vienna Stock Exchange The Panic of 1873 and Long Depression followed The heavily rural Austro Hungarian economy slowly modernised after 1867 Railroads opened up once remote areas and cities grew Many small firms promoted capitalist way of production Technological change accelerated industrialization and urbanization The first Austrian stock exchange the Wiener Borse was opened in 1771 in Vienna the first stock exchange of the Kingdom of Hungary the Budapest Stock Exchange was opened in Budapest in 1864 The central bank Bank of issue was founded as Austrian National Bank in 1816 In 1878 it transformed into Austro Hungarian National Bank with principal offices in both Vienna and Budapest The central bank was governed by alternating Austrian or Hungarian governors and vice governors Austria Hungary also became the world s third largest manufacturer and exporter of electric home appliances electric industrial appliances and power generation apparatus for power plants after the United States and the German Empire and it constructed Europe s second largest railway network after the German Empire In 2000 a study estimated that GDP in constant national prices in 1913 was 19 140 8 million for Cisleithania and 10 971 6 million for Transleithania a combined 30 112 4 million krone According to a 2005 study GDP PPP in 1913 was 105 515 million 1990 Int the fifth largest in Europe The gross national product per capita grew roughly 1 76 per year from 1870 to 1913 That level of growth compared very favorably to that of other European nations such as Britain 1 France 1 06 and Germany 1 51 However in a comparison with Germany and Britain the Austro Hungarian economy as a whole still lagged considerably as sustained modernization had begun much later Like the German Empire that of Austria Hungary frequently employed liberal economic policies and practices In 1873 the old Hungarian capital Buda and obuda Ancient Buda were officially merged with the third city Pest thus creating the new metropolis of Budapest The dynamic Pest grew into Hungary s administrative political economic trade and cultural hub Many of the state institutions and the modern administrative system of Hungary were established during this period Economic growth centered on Vienna and Budapest the Austrian lands areas of modern Austria the Alpine region and the Bohemian lands In the later years of the 19th century rapid economic growth spread to the central Hungarian plain and to the Carpathian lands As a result wide disparities of development existed within the empire In general the western areas became more developed than the eastern ones The Kingdom of Hungary became the world s second largest flour exporter after the United States The large Hungarian food exports were not limited to neighbouring Germany and Italy Hungary became the most important foreign food supplier of the large cities and industrial centres of the United Kingdom Galicia which has been described as the poorest province of Austro Hungary experienced near constant famines resulting in 50 000 deaths a year The Istro Romanians of Istria were also poor as pastoralism lost strength and agriculture was not productive However by the end of the 19th century economic differences gradually began to even out as economic growth in the eastern parts of the monarchy consistently surpassed that in the western The strong agriculture and food industry of the Kingdom of Hungary with the centre of Budapest became predominant within the empire and made up a large proportion of the export to the rest of Europe Meanwhile western areas concentrated mainly around Prague and Vienna excelled in various manufacturing industries This division of labour between the east and west besides the existing economic and monetary union led to an even more rapid economic growth throughout Austria Hungary by the early 20th century However since the turn of the twentieth century the Austrian half of the Monarchy could preserve its dominance within the empire in the sectors of the Industrial Revolution but Hungary had a better position in the modern industries of the Second Industrial Revolution in these modern sectors of the second industrial revolution like machine building industry and electric industry the Austrian competition could not become dominant InfrastructureTelecommunications Telegraph The first telegraph connection Vienna Brno Prague had started operation in 1847 In Hungarian territory the first telegraph stations were opened in Pressburg Pozsony today s Bratislava in December 1847 and in Buda in 1848 The first telegraph connection between Vienna and Pest Buda later Budapest was constructed in 1850 citation needed and Vienna Zagreb in 1850 Austria subsequently joined a telegraph union with German states In the Kingdom of Hungary 2 406 telegraph post offices operated in 1884 By 1914 the number of telegraph offices reached 3 000 in post offices and further 2 400 were installed in the railway stations of the Kingdom of Hungary Telephone The first telephone exchange was opened in Zagreb 8 January 1881 the second was in Budapest 1 May 1881 and the third was opened in Vienna 3 June 1881 Initially telephony was available in the homes of individual subscribers companies and offices Public telephone stations appeared in the 1890s and they quickly became widespread in post offices and railway stations Austria Hungary had 568 million telephone calls in 1913 only two Western European countries had more phone calls the German Empire and the United Kingdom The Austro Hungarian Empire was followed by France with 396 million telephone calls and Italy with 230 million phone calls In 1916 there were 366 million telephone calls in Cisleithania among them 8 4 million long distant calls All telephone exchanges of the cities towns and larger villages in Transleithania were linked until 1893 citation needed By 1914 more than 2000 settlements had telephone exchange in Kingdom of Hungary Electronic audio broadcasting A stentor reading the day s news in the Telefonhirmondo of Budapest The Telefon Hirmondo Telephone Herald news and entertainment service was introduced in Budapest in 1893 Two decades before the introduction of radio broadcasting people could listen to political economic and sports news cabaret music and opera in Budapest daily It operated over a special type of telephone exchange system Rail transport Detailed railway map of Austrian and Hungarian railways from 1911 By 1913 the combined length of the railway tracks of the Austrian Empire and Kingdom of Hungary reached 43 280 kilometres 26 890 miles In Western Europe only Germany had more extended railway network 63 378 km 39 381 mi the Austro Hungarian Empire was followed by France 40 770 km 25 330 mi the United Kingdom 32 623 km 20 271 mi Italy 18 873 km 11 727 mi and Spain 15 088 km 9 375 mi Railways in Transleithania The first Hungarian steam locomotive railway line was opened on 15 July 1846 between Pest and Vac In 1890 most large Hungarian private railway companies were nationalized as a consequence of the poor management of private companies except the strong Austrian owned Kaschau Oderberg Railway KsOd and the Austrian Hungarian Southern Railway SB DV They also joined the zone tariff system of the MAV Hungarian State Railways By 1910 the total length of the rail networks of Hungarian Kingdom reached 22 869 kilometres 14 210 miles the Hungarian network linked more than 1 490 settlements Nearly half 52 of the empire s railways were built in Hungary thus the railroad density there became higher than that of Cisleithania This has ranked Hungarian railways the 6th most dense in the world ahead of Germany and France Electrified commuter railways A set of four electric commuter rai lines were built in Budapest the BHEV Rackeve line 1887 Szentendre line 1888 Godollo line 1888 Csepel line 1912 Tramway lines in the cities Horse drawn tramways appeared in the first half of the 19th century Between the 1850s and 1880s many were built Vienna 1865 Budapest 1866 Brno 1869 Trieste 1876 Steam trams appeared in the late 1860s The electrification of tramways started in the late 1880s The first electrified tramway in Austria Hungary was built in Budapest in 1887 Electric tramway lines in the Austrian Empire Austria Gmunden 1894 Linz Vienna 1897 Graz 1898 Trieste 1900 Ljubljana 1901 Innsbruck 1905 Unterlach Ybbs an der Donau 1907 Salzburg 1909 Klagenfurt Sankt Polten 1911 Piran 1912 Austrian Littoral Pula 1904 Bohemia Prague 1891 Teplice 1895 Liberec 1897 Usti nad Labem Plzen Olomouc 1899 Moravia Brno Jablonec nad Nisou 1900 Ostrava 1901 Marianske Lazne 1902 Budejovice Ceske Budejovice Jihlava 1909 Austrian Silesia Opava Troppau 1905 Cieszyn Cieszyn 1911 Dalmatia Dubrovnik 1910 Galicia Lviv 1894 Bielsko Biala 1895 Krakow 1901 Tarnow Cieszyn 1911 Electric tramway lines in the Kingdom of Hungary Hungary Budapest 1887 Pressburg Pozsony Bratislava 1895 Szabadka Subotica 1897 Szombathely 1897 Miskolc 1897 Temesvar Timișoara 1899 Sopron 1900 Szatmarnemeti Satu Mare 1900 Nyiregyhaza 1905 Nagyszeben Sibiu 1905 Nagyvarad Oradea 1906 Szeged 1908 Debrecen 1911 Ujvidek Novi Sad 1911 Kassa Kosice 1913 Pecs 1913 Croatia Fiume 1899 Pula 1904 Opatija Lovran 1908 Zagreb 1910 Dubrovnik 1910 Underground The start of construction of the underground in Budapest 1894 1896 The Budapest Metro Line 1 originally the Franz Joseph Underground Electric Railway Company is the second oldest underground railway in the world the first being the London Underground s Metropolitan Line and the third being Glasgow and the first on the European mainland It was built from 1894 to 1896 and opened on 2 May 1896 In 2002 it was listed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site The M1 line became an IEEE Milestone due to the radically new innovations in its era Among the railway s innovative elements were bidirectional tram cars electric lighting in the subway stations and tram cars and an overhead wire structure instead of a third rail system for power Inland waterways and river regulation The first Danubian steamer company Donaudampfschiffahrtsgesellschaft DDSG was the world s largest inland shipping company until the collapse of Austria Hungary In 1900 the engineer C Wagenfuhrer drew up plans to link the Danube and the Adriatic Sea by a canal from Vienna to Trieste It was born from the desire of Austria Hungary to have a direct link to the Adriatic Sea but was never constructed Lower Danube and the Iron Gates In 1831 a plan had already been drafted to make the passage navigable at the initiative of the Hungarian politician Istvan Szechenyi Finally Gabor Baross Hungary s Iron Minister succeeded in financing this project The riverbed rocks and the associated rapids made the gorge valley an infamous passage for shipping In German the passage is still known as the Kataraktenstrecke even though the cataracts are gone Near the actual Iron Gates strait the Prigrada rock was the most important obstacle until 1896 the river widened considerably here and the water level was consequently low Upstream the Greben rock near the Kazan gorge was notorious Tisza River The length of the Tisza river in Hungary used to be 1 419 kilometres 882 miles It flowed through the Great Hungarian Plain which is one of the largest flat areas in central Europe Since plains can cause a river to flow very slowly the Tisza used to follow a path with many curves and turns which led to many large floods in the area After several small scale attempts Istvan Szechenyi organised the regulation of the Tisza Hungarian a Tisza szabalyozasa which started on 27 August 1846 and substantially ended in 1880 The new length of the river in Hungary was 966 km 600 mi 1 358 km 844 mi total with 589 km 366 mi of dead channels and 136 km 85 mi of new riverbed The resultant length of the flood protected river comprises 2 940 km 1 830 mi out of 4 220 km 2 620 mi of all Hungarian protected rivers Shipping and ports The SS Kaiser Franz Joseph I 12 567 t of the Austro Americana company was the largest passenger ship ever built in Austria Because of its control over the coast of much of the Balkans Austria Hungary had access to several seaports Dubrovnik Kingdom of Dalmatia The most important seaport was Trieste today part of Italy where the Austrian merchant marine was based Two major shipping companies Austrian Lloyd and Austro Americana and several shipyards were located there From 1815 to 1866 Venice had been part of the Habsburg empire The loss of Venice prompted the development of the Austrian merchant marine By 1913 the commercial marine of Austria comprised 16 764 vessels with a tonnage of 471 252 and crews number ing 45 567 Of the total 1913 394 of 422 368 tons were steamers and 16 370 of 48 884 tons were sailing vessels The Austrian Lloyd was one of the biggest ocean shipping companies of the time Prior to the beginning of World War I the company owned 65 middle sized and large steamers The Austro Americana owned one third of this number including the biggest Austrian passenger ship the SS Kaiser Franz Joseph I In comparison to the Austrian Lloyd the Austro American concentrated on destinations in North and South America The Austro Hungarian Navy became much more significant than previously as industrialization provided sufficient revenues to develop it Pola Pula today part of Croatia was especially significant for the navy The most important seaport for the Hungarian part of the monarchy was Fiume Rijeka today part of Croatia where the Hungarian shipping companies such as the Adria operated The commercial marine of the Kingdom of Hungary in 1913 comprised 545 vessels of 144 433 tons and crews numbering 3 217 Of the total number of vessels 134 000 of 142 539 tons were steamers and 411 of 1 894 tons were sailing vessels MilitaryThe Austro Hungarian Army was under the command of Archduke Albrecht Duke of Teschen 1817 1895 an old fashioned bureaucrat who opposed modernization The military system of the Austro Hungarian monarchy was similar in both states and rested since 1868 upon the principle of the universal and personal obligation of the citizen to bear arms Its military force was composed of the Common Army the special armies namely the Austrian Landwehr and the Hungarian Honved which were separate national institutions and the Landsturm or levy en masse As stated above the common army stood under the administration of the joint minister of war while the special armies were under the administration of the respective ministries of national defence The yearly contingent of recruits for the army was fixed by the military bills voted on by the Austrian and Hungarian parliaments and was generally determined on the basis of the population according to the last census returns It amounted in 1905 to 103 100 men of which Austria furnished 59 211 men and Hungary 43 889 Besides 10 000 men were annually allotted to the Austrian Landwehr and 12 500 to the Hungarian Honved The term of service was two years three years in the cavalry with the colours seven or eight in the reserve and two in the Landwehr in the case of men not drafted to the active army the same total period of service was spent in various special reserves The common minister of war was the head for the administration of all military affairs except those of the Austrian Landwehr and of the Hungarian Honved which were committed to the ministries for national defence of the two respective states But the supreme command of the army was nominally vested in the monarch who had the power to take all measures regarding the whole army In practice the emperor s nephew Archduke Albrecht was his chief military advisor and made the policy decisions The Austro Hungarian Navy was mainly a coast defence force and also included a flotilla of monitors for the Danube It was administered by the naval department of the ministry of war 1878 1914 Congress of Berlin Balkan instability and the Bosnia Crisis Recruits from Bosnia Herzegovina including Muslim Bosniaks 31 were drafted into special units of the Austro Hungarian Army as early as 1879 and were commended for their bravery in service of the Austrian emperor being awarded more medals than any other unit The military march Die Bosniaken kommen was composed in their honor by Eduard Wagnes Russian Pan Slavic organizations sent aid to the Balkan rebels and so pressured the tsar s government to declare war on the Ottoman Empire in 1877 in the name of protecting Orthodox Christians Unable to mediate between the Ottoman Empire and Russia over the control of Serbia Austria Hungary declared neutrality when the conflict between the two powers escalated into a war With help from Romania and Greece Russia defeated the Ottomans and with the Treaty of San Stefano tried to create a large pro Russian Bulgaria This treaty sparked an international uproar that almost resulted in a general European war Austria Hungary and Britain feared that a large Bulgaria would become a Russian satellite that would enable the tsar to dominate the Balkans British prime minister Benjamin Disraeli moved warships into position against Russia to halt the advance of Russian influence in the eastern Mediterranean so close to Britain s route through the Suez Canal The Treaty of San Stefano was seen in Austria as much too favourable for Russia and its Orthodox Slavic goals The Congress of Berlin rolled back the Russian victory by partitioning the large Bulgarian state that Russia had carved out of Ottoman territory and denying any part of Bulgaria full independence from the Ottomans The Congress of Berlin in 1878 let Austria occupy but not annex the province of Bosnia and Herzegovina a predominantly Slavic area Austria occupied Bosnia and Herzegovina as a way of gaining power in the Balkans Serbia Montenegro and Romania became fully independent Nonetheless the Balkans remained a site of political unrest with teeming ambition for independence and great power rivalries At the Congress of Berlin in 1878 Gyula Andrassy Minister of Foreign Affairs managed to force Russia to retreat from further demands in the Balkans As a result Greater Bulgaria was broken up and Serbian independence was guaranteed In that year with Britain s support Austria Hungary stationed troops in Bosnia to prevent the Russians from expanding into nearby Serbia In another measure to keep the Russians out of the Balkans Austria Hungary formed an alliance the Mediterranean Entente with Britain and Italy in 1887 and concluded mutual defence pacts with Germany in 1879 and Romania in 1883 against a possible Russian attack Following the Congress of Berlin the European powers attempted to guarantee stability through a complex series of alliances and treaties Anxious about Balkan instability and Russian aggression and to counter French interests in Europe Austria Hungary forged a defensive alliance with Germany in October 1879 and in May 1882 In October 1882 Italy joined this partnership in the Triple Alliance largely because of Italy s imperial rivalries with France Tensions between Russia and Austria Hungary remained high so Bismarck replaced the League of the Three Emperors with the Reinsurance Treaty with Russia to keep the Habsburgs from recklessly starting a war over Pan Slavism The Sandzak Raska Novibazar region was under Austro Hungarian occupation between 1878 and 1909 when it was returned to the Ottoman Empire before being ultimately divided between kingdoms of Montenegro and Serbia On the heels of the Great Balkan Crisis Austro Hungarian forces occupied Bosnia and Herzegovina in August 1878 and the monarchy eventually annexed Bosnia and Herzegovina in October 1908 as a common holding of Cisleithania and Transleithania under the control of the rather than attaching it to either territorial government The annexation in 1908 led some in Vienna to contemplate combining Bosnia and Herzegovina with Croatia to form a third Slavic component of the monarchy The deaths of Franz Joseph s brother Maximilian 1867 and his only son Rudolf made the Emperor s nephew Franz Ferdinand heir to the throne The Archduke was rumoured to have been an advocate for this trialism as a means to limit the power of the Hungarian aristocracy A proclamation issued on the occasion of its annexation to the Habsburg monarchy in October 1908 promised these lands constitutional institutions which should secure to their inhabitants full civil rights and a share in the management of their own affairs by means of a local representative assembly In performance of this promise a constitution was promulgated in 1910 The principal players in the Bosnian Crisis of 1908 09 were the foreign ministers of Austria and Russia Alois Lexa von Aehrenthal and Alexander Izvolsky Both were motivated by political ambition the first would emerge successful and the latter would be broken by the crisis Along the way they would drag Europe to the brink of war in 1909 They would also divide Europe into the two armed camps that would go to war in July 1914 Aehrenthal had started with the assumption that the Slavic minorities could never come together and the Balkan League would never cause any damage to Austria He turned down an Ottoman proposal for an alliance that would include Austria Turkey and Romania However his policies alienated the Bulgarians who turned instead to Russia and Serbia Although Austria had no intention to embark on additional expansion to the south Aehrenthal encouraged speculation to that effect expecting that it would paralyze the Balkan states Instead it incited them to feverish activity to create a defensive block to stop Austria A series of grave miscalculations at the highest level thus significantly strengthened Austria s enemies In 1914 Slavic militants in Bosnia rejected Austria s plan to fully absorb the area they assassinated the Austrian heir and precipitated World War I 1914 1918 World War IPrelude of WW I This picture of the arrest of a suspect in Sarajevo is usually associated with the capture of Gavrilo Princip although some believe it depicts Ferdinand Behr a bystander detained by mistake The 28 June 1914 assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in the Bosnian capital Sarajevo excessively intensified the existing traditional religion based ethnic hostilities in Bosnia However in Sarajevo itself Austrian authorities encouraged violence against the Serb residents which resulted in anti Serb riots in Sarajevo in which Catholic Croats and Bosnian Muslims killed two and damaged numerous Serb owned buildings Writer Ivo Andric referred to the violence as the Sarajevo frenzy of hate Violent actions against ethnic Serbs were organized not only in Sarajevo but also in many other larger Austro Hungarian cities in modern day Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina Austro Hungarian authorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina imprisoned and extradited approximately 5 500 prominent Serbs 700 to 2 200 of whom died in prison Four hundred sixty Serbs were sentenced to death and a predominantly Muslim special militia known as the Schutzkorps was established and carried out the persecution of Serbs Crowds on the streets in the aftermath of the Anti Serb riots in Sarajevo 29 June 1914MAVAG armoured train in 1914 Some members of the government such as Minister of Foreign Affairs Count Leopold Berchtold and Army Commander Count Franz Conrad von Hotzendorf had wanted to confront the resurgent Serbian nation for some years in a preventive war but the Emperor and Hungarian prime minister Istvan Tisza were opposed The foreign ministry of Austro Hungarian Empire sent ambassador Laszlo Szogyeny to Potsdam where he inquired about the standpoint of the German emperor Wilhelm II on 5 July and received a supportive response His Majesty authorized me to report to Franz Joseph that in this case too we could count on Germany s full support As mentioned he first had to consult with the Chancellor but he did not have the slightest doubt that Herr von Bethmann Hollweg would fully agree with him particularly with regard to action on our part against Serbia In his Wilhelm s opinion though there was no need to wait patiently before taking action The leaders of Austria Hungary therefore decided to confront Serbia militarily before it could incite a revolt using the assassination as an excuse they presented a list of ten demands called the July Ultimatum expecting Serbia would never accept When Serbia accepted nine of the ten demands but only partially accepted the remaining one Austria Hungary declared war Franz Joseph I finally followed the urgent counsel of his top advisers Over the course of July and August 1914 these events caused the start of World War I as Russia mobilized in support of Serbia setting off a series of counter mobilizations In support of his German ally on Thursday 6 August 1914 Emperor Franz Joseph signed the declaration of war on Russia Italy initially remained neutral despite its alliance with Austria Hungary In 1915 it switched to the side of the Entente powers hoping to gain territory from its former ally Wartime foreign policy Franz Josef I and Wilhelm II with military commanders during World War I The Austro Hungarian Empire played a relatively passive diplomatic role in the war as it was increasingly dominated and controlled by Germany The only goal was to punish Serbia and try to stop the ethnic breakup of the Empire and it completely failed Starting in late 1916 the new Emperor Karl removed the pro German officials and opened peace overtures to the Allies whereby the entire war could be ended by compromise or perhaps Austria would make a separate peace from Germany The main effort was vetoed by Italy which had been promised large slices of Austria for joining the Allies in 1915 Austria was only willing to turn over the Trentino region but nothing more Karl was seen as a defeatist which weakened his standing at home and with both the Allies and Germany Homefront The heavily rural empire did have a small industrial base but its major contributions were manpower and food Nevertheless Austria Hungary was more urbanized 25 than its actual opponents in the war like the Russian Empire 13 4 Serbia 13 2 or Romania 18 8 Furthermore the Austro Hungarian Empire had also more industrialized economy and higher GDP per capita than the Kingdom of Italy which was economically the far most developed actual opponent of the Empire On the home front food grew scarcer and scarcer as did heating fuel Hungary with its heavy agricultural base was somewhat better fed The army conquered productive agricultural areas in Romania and elsewhere but refused to allow food shipments to civilians back home Morale fell every year and the diverse nationalities gave up on the empire and looked for ways to establish their own nation states Inflation soared from an index of 129 in 1914 to 1589 in 1918 wiping out the cash savings of the middle class In terms of war damage to the economy the war consumed about 20 percent of the gross domestic product The dead soldiers amounted to about four percent of the 1914 labor force and the wounded ones to another six percent Compared to the major countries in the war the death and casualty rates were toward the high end regarding the present day territory of Austria By summer 1918 Green Cadres of army deserters formed armed bands in the hills of Croatia Slavonia and civil authority disintegrated By late October violence and massive looting erupted and there were efforts to form peasant republics However the Croatian political leadership was focused on creating a new state Yugoslavia and worked with the advancing Serbian army to impose control and end the uprisings Theaters of operations The Austro Hungarian Empire conscripted 7 8 million soldiers during the war General von Hotzendorf was the Chief of the Austro Hungarian General Staff Franz Joseph I who was much too old to command the army appointed Archduke Friedrich von Osterreich Teschen as Supreme Army Commander Armeeoberkommandant but asked him to give Von Hotzendorf freedom to take any decisions Von Hotzendorf remained in effective command of the military forces until Emperor Karl I took supreme command himself in late 1916 and dismissed Conrad von Hotzendorf in 1917 Meanwhile economic conditions on the home front deteriorated rapidly The empire depended on agriculture and agriculture depended on the heavy labor of millions of men who were now in the army Food production fell the transportation system became overcrowded and industrial production could not successfully handle the overwhelming need for munitions Germany provided a great deal of help but it was not enough Furthermore the political instability of the multiple ethnic groups within the empire now ripped apart any hope for national consensus in support of the war Increasingly there was a demand for breaking up the empire and setting up autonomous national states based on historic language based cultures The new emperor sought peace terms from the Allies but his initiatives were vetoed by Italy page needed Serbian front 1914 1916 At the start of the war the army was divided into two the smaller part attacked Serbia while the larger part fought against the formidable Imperial Russian Army The invasion of Serbia in 1914 was a disaster by the end of the year the Austro Hungarian Army had taken no territory but had lost 227 000 out of a total force of 450 000 men However in the autumn of 1915 the Serbian Army was defeated by the Central Powers which led to the occupation of Serbia Near the end of 1915 in a massive rescue operation involving more than 1 000 trips made by Italian French and British steamers 260 000 Serb soldiers were transported to Brindisi and Corfu where they waited for the chance of the victory of Allied powers to reclaim their country Corfu hosted the Serbian government in exile after the collapse of Serbia and served as a supply base for the Greek front In April 1916 a large number of Serbian troops were transported in British and French naval vessels from Corfu to mainland Greece The contingent numbering over 120 000 relieved a much smaller army at the Macedonian front and fought alongside British and French troops Russian front 1914 1917 Siege of Przemysl in 1915 On the Eastern front the war started out equally poorly The government accepted the Polish proposal of establishing the Supreme National Committee as the Polish central authority within the empire responsible for the formation of the Polish Legions an auxiliary military formation within the Austro Hungarian Army The Austro Hungarian Army was defeated at the Battle of Lemberg and the great fortress city of Przemysl was besieged and fell in March 1915 The Gorlice Tarnow Offensive started as a minor German offensive to relieve the pressure of the Russian numerical superiority on the Austro Hungarians but the cooperation of the Central Powers resulted in huge Russian losses and the total collapse of the Russian lines and their 100 km 62 mi long retreat into Russia The Russian Third Army disintegrated In summer 1915 the Austro Hungarian Army under a unified command with the Germans participated in the successful Gorlice Tarnow Offensive From June 1916 the Russians focused their attacks on the Austro Hungarian Army in the Brusilov Offensive recognizing the latter s numerical inferiority By the end of September 1916 Austria Hungary mobilized and concentrated new divisions and the successful Russian advance was halted and slowly repelled but the Austrian armies took heavy losses about 1 million men and never recovered Nevertheless the huge losses in men and materiel inflicted on the Russians during the offensive contributed greatly to the Russian Revolution of 1917 and caused an economic crash in the Russian Empire The Act of 5 November 1916 was then proclaimed to the Poles jointly by the Emperors Wilhelm II of Germany and Franz Joseph of Austria Hungary This act promised the creation of the Kingdom of Poland out of the territory of Congress Poland envisioned by its authors as a puppet state controlled by the Central Powers with the nominal authority vested in the Regency Council The origin of that document was the dire need to draft new recruits from German occupied Poland for the war with Russia Following the Armistice of 11 November 1918 ending the World War I in spite of the previous initial total dependence of the kingdom on its sponsors it ultimately served against their intentions as the cornerstone proto state of the nascent Second Polish Republic the latter composed also of territories never intended by the Central Powers to be ceded to Poland The Battle of Zborov 1917 was the first significant action of the Czechoslovak Legions which fought for the independence of Czechoslovakia against the Austro Hungarian Army Italian front 1915 1918 Italian troops in Trento on 3 November 1918 after the Battle of Vittorio Veneto Italy s victory marked the end of the war on the Italian Front and secured the dissolution of Austria Hungary In May 1915 Italy attacked Austria Hungary Italy was the only military opponent of Austria Hungary which had a similar degree of industrialization and economic level moreover her army was numerous 1 000 000 men were immediately fielded but suffered from poor leadership training and organization Chief of Staff Luigi Cadorna marched his army towards the Isonzo River hoping to seize Ljubljana and to eventually threaten Vienna However the Royal Italian Army were halted on the river where four battles took place over five months 23 June 2 December 1915 The fight was extremely bloody and exhausting for both sides On 15 May 1916 Austrian Chief of Staff Conrad von Hotzendorf launched the Strafexpedition punitive expedition the Austrians broke through the front and occupied the Asiago plateau The Italians managed to resist and in a counteroffensive seized Gorizia on 9 August Nonetheless they had to stop on the Carso a few kilometres away from the border At this point several months of indecisive trench warfare ensued analogous to the Western front As the Russian Empire collapsed as a result of the Bolshevik Revolution and the Russians ended their involvement in the war Germans and Austrians were able to transfer much of their manpower to the Western and Southern fronts from the erstwhile Eastern fighting On 24 October 1917 Austrians now enjoying decisive German support attacked at Caporetto using new infiltration tactics although they advanced more than 100 km 62 14 mi in the direction of Venice and gained considerable supplies they were halted and could not cross the Piave River Italy although suffering massive casualties recovered from the blow and a coalition government under Vittorio Emanuele Orlando was formed Italy also enjoyed the support of the Entente by 1918 large amounts of war materials and a few auxiliary American British and French divisions arrived in the Italian battle zone Cadorna was replaced by General Armando Diaz under his command the Italians retook the initiative and won the decisive Second Battle of the Piave River 15 23 June 1918 in which some 60 000 Austrian and 43 000 Italian soldiers were killed The final battle at Vittorio Veneto was lost by 31 October 1918 and the armistice was signed at Villa Giusti on 3 November Romanian front 1916 1917 On 27 August 1916 Romania declared war against Austria Hungary The Romanian Army crossed the borders of eastern Hungary Transylvania but despite initial successes by November 1916 the Austro Hungarian German Bulgarian and Ottoman armies had defeated the Romanian and Russian armies and occupied the southern part of Romania including Oltenia Muntenia and Dobruja Within three months of the war the Central Powers approached Bucharest the Romanian capital On 6 December Bucharest was captured and part of the population moved to the unoccupied Romanian territory in Moldavia together with the Romanian government royal court and public authorities which relocated to Iași In 1917 after several defensive victories managing to stop the German Austro Hungarian advance with Russia s withdrawal from the war following the October Revolution Romania was forced to drop out of the war Role of Hungary War memorial in Păuleni Ciuc Romania Although the Kingdom of Hungary comprised only 42 of the population of Austria Hungary the thin majority more than 3 8 million soldiers of the Austro Hungarian armed forces were conscripted from the Kingdom of Hungary during the First World War Roughly 600 000 soldiers were killed in action and 700 000 soldiers were wounded in the war Austria Hungary held on for years as the Hungarian half provided sufficient supplies for the military to continue to wage war This was shown in a transition of power after which the Hungarian prime minister Count Istvan Tisza and foreign minister Count Istvan Burian had decisive influence over the internal and external affairs of the monarchy By late 1916 food supply from Hungary became intermittent and the government sought an armistice with the Entente powers However this failed as Britain and France no longer had any regard for the integrity of the monarchy because of Austro Hungarian support for Germany Analysis of defeat The setbacks that the Austrian army suffered in 1914 and 1915 can be attributed to a large extent by the incompetence of the Austrian high command After attacking Serbia its forces soon had to be withdrawn to protect its eastern frontier against Russia s invasion while German units were engaged in fighting on the Western Front This resulted in a greater than expected loss of men in the invasion of Serbia Furthermore it became evident that the Austrian high command had had no plans for possible continental war and that the army and navy were also ill equipped to handle such a conflict In the last two years of the war the Austro Hungarian armed forces lost all ability to act independently of Germany As of 7 September 1916 the German emperor was given full control of all the armed forces of the Central Powers and Austria Hungary effectively became a satellite of Germany The Austrians viewed the German army favorably on the other hand by 1916 the general belief in Germany was that Germany in its alliance with Austria Hungary was shackled to a corpse The operational capability of the Austro Hungarian army was seriously affected by supply shortages low morale and a high casualty rate and by the army s composition of multiple ethnicities with different languages and customs 1918 Demise disintegration dissolution Karl I of Austria envisaged the Habsburg Empire as being made up of five Kingdoms in a last desperate attempt to save the Monarchy A humorous obituary of the Austrian Empire published in Krakow in late 1918 Translation Overwhelmed with joy until recently enslaved and now free Nations announce that their wicked step mother AUSTRIA the WITCH operated in William s Clinic died from senility after severe spasms cursed by all those who had the infelicity of having to do with her Her dreadful funeral took place during these days in the fields of Macedonia on the Piave River and across the Rhine Let her rest in eternal peace and may she never raise from the dead POLES CZECHO SLOVAKS YUGOSLAVS Funeral home Wilson amp Co By 1918 the economic situation had deteriorated and governmental failure on the homefront ended popular support for the war The Austro Hungarian monarchy collapsed with dramatic speed in the autumn of 1918 Leftist and pacifist political movements organized strikes in factories and uprisings in the army had become commonplace As the war went on the ethnic unity declined the Allies encouraged breakaway demands from minorities and the Empire faced disintegration With apparent Allied victory approaching nationalist movements seized ethnic resentment to erode social unity The military breakdown of the Italian front marked the start of the rebellion for the numerous ethnicities who made up the multiethnic Empire as they refused to keep on fighting for a cause that now appeared senseless The Emperor had lost much of his power to rule as his realm disintegrated On 14 October 1918 Foreign Minister Baron Istvan Burian von Rajecz asked for an armistice based on President Woodrow Wilson s Fourteen Points and two days later Emperor Karl I issued a proclamation Imperial Manifesto of 16 October 1918 altering the empire into a federal union to give ethnic groups decentralization and representation However on 18 October United States Secretary of State Robert Lansing replied that autonomy for the nationalities the tenth of the Fourteen Points was no longer enough In fact a Czechoslovak provisional government had joined the Allies on 14 October The South Slavs in both halves of the monarchy had already declared in favor of uniting with Serbia in a large South Slav state in the 1917 Corfu Declaration signed by members of the Yugoslav Committee The Croatians had begun disregarding orders from Budapest earlier in October Lansing s response was in effect the death certificate of Austria Hungary During the Italian battles the Czechoslovaks and Southern Slavs declared their independence With defeat in the war imminent after the Italian offensive in the Battle of Vittorio Veneto on 24 October Czech politicians peacefully took over command in Prague on 28 October later declared the birth of Czechoslovakia and followed up in other major cities in the next few days On 30 October the Slovaks did the same On 29 October the Slavs in both portions of what remained of Austria Hungary proclaimed the State of Slovenes Croats and Serbs and declared that their ultimate intention was to unite with Serbia and Montenegro in a large South Slav state On the same day the Czechs and Slovaks formally proclaimed the establishment of Czechoslovakia as an independent state citation needed On 17 October 1918 the Hungarian Parliament voted in favour of terminating the union with Austria The most prominent opponent of continued union with Austria Count Mihaly Karolyi seized power in the Aster Revolution on 31 October Charles was all but forced to appoint Karolyi as his Hungarian prime minister One of Karolyi s first acts was to formally repudiate the compromise agreement on 31 October effectively terminating the personal union with Austria and thus officially dissolving the Austro Hungarian state By the end of October there was nothing left of the Habsburg realm but its majority German Danubian and Alpine provinces and Karl s authority was being challenged even there by the German Austrian state council Karl s last Austrian prime minister Heinrich Lammasch concluded that Karl s position was untenable Lammasch persuaded Karl that the best course was to relinquish at least temporarily his right to exercise sovereign authority On 11 November Karl issued a carefully worded proclamation in which he recognized the Austrian people s right to determine the form of the state and relinquish ed every participation in Austrian state affairs On the day after he announced his withdrawal from Austrian politics the German Austrian National Council proclaimed the Republic of German Austria Karolyi followed suit on 16 November proclaiming the Hungarian Democratic Republic Successor statesThe Treaty of Trianon Kingdom of Hungary lost 72 of its land and 3 3 million people of Hungarian ethnicity There were two legal successor states of the former Austro Hungarian monarchy German Austria which became the Republic of Austria Hungarian Democratic Republic which after a few other short lived intermediaries became the Kingdom of Hungary The 1919 Treaties of Saint Germain en Laye between the victors of World War I and Austria and Trianon between the victors and Hungary regulated the new borders of Austria and Hungary reducing them to small sized and landlocked states The Entente not only assumed without question that the minority peoples wished to leave Austria and Hungary but allowed them to claim vast territories containing sizeable German and Hungarian speaking populations With this in mind in regard to areas without a decisive national majority the Entente powers ruled in many cases in favour of the newly emancipated independent nation states The Republic of Austria lost roughly 60 of the old Austrian Empire s territory It also had to drop its plans for union with Germany as it was not allowed to unite with Germany without League approval citation needed Hungary however was severely disrupted by the loss of 72 of its territory 64 of its population and most of its natural resources The Hungarian Democratic Republic was short lived and was temporarily replaced by the communist Hungarian Soviet Republic Romanian troops ousted Bela Kun and his communist government during the Hungarian Romanian War of 1919 citation needed In the summer of 1919 a Habsburg Archduke Joseph August became regent but was forced to stand down after only two weeks when it became apparent the Allies would not recognise him Finally in March 1920 royal powers were entrusted to a regent Miklos Horthy who had been the last commanding admiral of the Austro Hungarian Navy and had helped organize the counter revolutionary forces It was this government that signed the Treaty of Trianon under protest on 4 June 1920 at the Grand Trianon Palace in Versailles France The restored Kingdom of Hungary lost roughly 72 of the pre war territory of the Kingdom of Hungary Habsburg banishment Austria had passed the Habsburg Law which both dethroned the Habsburgs and banished all Habsburgs from Austrian territory While Karl was banned from ever returning to Austria again other Habsburgs could return if they gave up all claims to the defunct throne In March and again in October 1921 ill prepared attempts by Karl to regain the throne in Budapest collapsed The initially wavering Horthy after receiving threats of intervention from the Allied Powers and the Little Entente refused his cooperation Soon afterward the Hungarian government nullified the Pragmatic Sanction effectively dethroning the Habsburgs Subsequently the British took custody of Karl and removed him and his family to the Portuguese island of Madeira where he died the following year citation needed Territorial legacyImmediately after World War I New hand drawn borders of Austria Hungary in the Treaty of Trianon and Saint Germain 1919 1920 New borders of Austria Hungary after the Treaty of Trianon and Saint Germain Border of Austria Hungary in 1914 Borders in 1914 Borders in 1920 Empire of Austria in 1914 Kingdom of Hungary in 1914 Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1914Post WWI borders on an ethnic map The following states were formed re established or expanded at the dissolution of the former Austro Hungarian monarchy German Austria which became the Republic of Austria First Hungarian Republic which became the Hungarian Soviet Republic subsequently briefly restored and replaced by the Hungarian Republic ultimately transformed into the Kingdom of Hungary First Czechoslovak Republic later Czechoslovakia Second Polish Republic contested by the short lived proto states of Tarnobrzeg Republic and Polish Soviet Socialist Republic State of Slovenes Croats and Serbs and the Kingdom of Serbia both later absorbed into the Kingdom of Serbs Croats and Slovenes Greater Romania Kingdom of Italy Republic of China former Austro Hungarian concession of Tianjin the short lived Ruthenian Ukrainian and Rusyn proto states of West Ukrainian People s Republic later absorbed into Ukrainian People s Republic Hutsul Republic Lemko Republic Komancza Republic and the Galician Soviet Socialist Republic all were ultimately absorbed mostly into Poland but also into Hungary Czechoslovakia Romania and Yugoslavia The Principality of Liechtenstein which had formerly looked to Vienna for protection and whose ruling house held sizable real estate in Cisleithania formed a customs and defense union with Switzerland and adopted the Swiss currency instead of the Austrian In April 1919 Vorarlberg the westernmost province of Austria voted by a large majority to join Switzerland however both the Swiss and the Allies disregarded this result Present Kingdoms and countries of Austria Hungary Cisleithania Empire of Austria 1 Bohemia 2 Bukovina 3 Carinthia 4 Carniola 5 Dalmatia 6 Galicia 7 Kustenland 8 Lower Austria 9 Moravia 10 Salzburg 11 Silesia 12 Styria 13 Tyrol 14 Upper Austria 15 Vorarlberg Transleithania Kingdom of Hungary 16 Hungary proper 17 Croatia Slavonia 18 Bosnia and Herzegovina Austro Hungarian condominium The following present day countries and parts of countries were within the boundaries of Austria Hungary when the empire was dissolved Some other provinces of Europe had been part of the Habsburg monarchy at one time before 1867 Empire of Austria Cisleithania Austria except Burgenland without Sopron Czech Republic except the Hlucinsko area Slovenia except Prekmurje Italy Trentino South Tyrol parts of the province of Belluno and small portions of Friuli Venezia Giulia Croatia Dalmatia Istria Poland voivodeships of Lesser Poland Subcarpathia southernmost part of Silesia Bielsko and Cieszyn Ukraine oblasts of Lviv Ivano Frankivsk Ternopil except its northern corner and most of the oblast of Chernivtsi Romania county of Suceava Montenegro bay of Boka Kotorska the coast and the immediate hinterland around the cities of Budva Petrovac and Sutomore Kingdom of Hungary Transleithania Hungary Slovakia Austria Burgenland except Sopron Slovenia Prekmurje Croatia Croatian Baranja and Međimurje county Fiume as corpus separatum along with Slavonia and Central Croatia were not part of Hungary proper the latter two were part of the sovereign Kingdom of Croatia Slavonia Ukraine oblast of Zakarpattia Romania region of Transylvania Partium and parts of Banat Crișana and Maramureș Serbia autonomous province of Vojvodina and northern Belgrade region Poland Polish parts of Orava and Spis Austro Hungarian Condominium Bosnia and Herzegovina the villages of Zavalje Mali Skocaj and Veliki Skocaj including the immediate surrounding area west of the city of Bihac Montenegro Sutorina western part of the Municipality of Herceg Novi between present borders with Croatia SW and Bosnia and Herzegovina NW Adriatic coast E and the township of Igalo NE Sandzak Raska region Austro Hungarian occupied 1878 until withdrawal in 1908 whilst formally part of the Ottoman Empire The Empire treated Bosnia Herzegovina in much the same way the other powers treated their overseas colonies 175 Other possessions of the Austro Hungarian Monarchy People s Republic of China former Austro Hungarian concession of Tianjin See alsoAftermath of World War I Austrian nobility Corporative federalism a form of administration adopted by the Austro Hungarian Empire Diplomatic history of World War I Austro Hungarian entry into World War I Ethnic composition of Austria Hungary Former countries in Europe after 1815 Hungarian nobility Lands of the Bohemian Crown 1867 1918 United States of Greater AustriaNotesIncluding 64 66 Latin and 10 12 Eastern Lutheran Reformed Unitarian German Osterreich Ungarn ˈoːsteʁaɪc ˈʊŋɡaʁn Hungarian Ausztria Magyarorszag ˈɒustrijɒ ˈmɒɟɒrorsaːɡ The concept of Eastern Europe is not firmly defined and depending on the interpretation some territories may be included or excluded from it this holds for parts of Austria Hungary as well although the historical interpretation clearly places the monarchy in Central Europe The kingdom of Hungary desired equal status with the Austrian empire which was weakened by its defeat in the German Austro Prussian War of 1866 The Austrian emperor Francis Joseph gave Hungary full internal autonomy together with a responsible ministry and in return it agreed that the empire should still be a single great state for purposes of war and foreign affairs thus maintaining its dynastic prestige abroad From 45 5 to 50 4 Bosnia Herzegovina is excluded from these estimates ReferencesCitype Internet Portal Betriebsges m b H Fisher Gilman The Essentials of Geography for School Year 1888 1889 p 47 Archived 6 May 2023 at the Wayback Machine New England Publishing Company Boston 1888 Retrieved 20 August 2014 Austria Races Encyclopaedia Britannica Vol III 9th ed p 118 Archived from the original on 5 March 2023 Retrieved 25 March 2022 From the Encyclopaedia Britannica 1878 although this Romani refers to the language of those described by the EB as Gypsies the EB s Rumani or Wallachian refers to what is today known as Romanian Rusyn and Ukrainian correspond to dialects of what the EB refers to as Ruthenian and Yiddish was the common language of the Austrian Jews although Hebrew was also known by many Geographischer Atlas zur Vaterlandskunde 1911 Tabelle 3 Headlam James Wycliffe 1911 Austria Hungary In Chisholm Hugh ed Encyclopaedia Britannica Vol 3 11th ed Cambridge University Press pp 2 39 Osterreichische Statistik Neue Folge in German Osterreichische Nationalbibliothek Archived from the original on 1 June 2023 Retrieved 13 September 2024 1910 EVI NEPSZAMLALAS 1 A nepesseg fobb adatai kozsegek es nepesebb pusztak telepek szerint 1912 Konyvtar Hungaricana in Hungarian Hungarian Central Statistical Office 1912 p 17 Archived from the original on 23 December 2023 Retrieved 13 September 2024 Martin Mutschlechner The Dual Monarchy two states in a single empire 6 June 2014 Archived from the original on 3 June 2023 Retrieved 6 May 2023 Schulze Max Stephan 1996 Engineering and Economic Growth The Development of Austria Hungary s Machine Building Industry in the Late Nineteenth Century Frankfurt am Main Peter Lang p 295 Andrassy Gyula 1896 Az 1867 iki i e ezernyolcszazhatvanhetediki kiegyezesrol Franklin Tarsulat p 321 Roman 2003 p 401 Szavai Ferenc Tibor Konyvszemle Book review Kozari Monika A dualista rendszer 1867 1918 Modern magyar politikai rendszerek Magyar Tudomany in Hungarian p 1542 Archived from the original on 28 July 2013 Retrieved 20 July 2012 Hungary Dual Monarchy Austro Hungarian Empire WWI Britannica www britannica com Archived from the original on 16 May 2024 Retrieved 16 May 2024 Minahan 1998 p 48 Jayne Kingsley Garland 1911 Bosnia and Herzegovina In Chisholm Hugh ed Encyclopaedia Britannica Vol 4 11th ed Cambridge University Press pp 279 286 Vajda Stephan 1980 Felix Austria Eine Geschichte Osterreichs Manuscript of Franz Joseph I in German Vienna Ueberreuter ISBN 3 8000 3168 X Philippoff Eva 2002 L Autriche Hongorie Politique et culture a travers les texts 1867 1918 Die Doppelmonarchie Osterreich Ungarn Ein politisches Lesebuch 1867 1918 in French Villeneuve d Ascq Presses Univ Septentrion p 60 ISBN 2 8593 9739 6 OL 3631159M Kotulla Michael 17 August 2008 Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte Springer Berlin Heidelberg ISBN 978 3 5404 8707 4 Kay David 1878 Austria In Baynes T S ed Encyclopaedia Britannica Vol 3 9th ed New York Charles Scribner s Sons pp 116 141 Peter Laszlo 2011 Hungary s Long Nineteenth Century Constitutional and Democratic Traditions in a European Perspective Leiden the Netherlands Koninklijke Brill ISBN 978 9 0042 2421 6 Kann 1974 Sked 1989 Taylor 1964 Kann 1974 Lesaffer Randall 2021 The War of 1866 and the Undoing of Vienna Oxford Public International Law Archived from the original on 31 July 2021 Retrieved 31 July 2021 Schmitt Hans A 1968 Count Beust and Germany 1866 1870 Reconquest Realignment or Resignation Central European History 1 1 20 34 doi 10 1017 S000893890001476X ISSN 0008 9389 JSTOR 4545476 S2CID 144762108 Roider Karl A Wagnleitner Reinhold F Fellner Fritz Zollner Erich Ray Michael 28 November 2023 History of Austria Encyclopedia Britannica Archived from the original on 8 April 2024 Retrieved 31 January 2024 Langer William L 1950 European Alliances and Alignments 1871 1890 2nd ed p 20 Compromise of 1867 Encyclopaedia Britannica 2007 Roman 2003 p 401 The New Encyclopaedia Britannica Encyclopaedia Britannica 2003 ISBN 978 0 8522 9961 6 Balazs Eva H 1997 Hungary and the Habsburgs 1765 1800 An Experiment in Enlightened Absolutism Central European University Press p 320 ISBN 978 9 6391 1603 0 Kronenbitter Gunther 2003 Krieg im Frieden Die Fuhrung der k u k Armee und die Grossmachtpolitik Osterreich Ungarns 1906 1914 in German Munich Verlag Oldenbourg p 150 ISBN 3 4865 6700 4 Taylor 1964 Gabor 2010 Staatsgrundgesetz 1867 Headlam 1911 p 39 Wank Solomon Jelavich Barbara 1980 The Impact of the Dual Alliance on the Germans in Austria and Vice Versa East Central Europe 7 2 288 309 doi 10 1163 187633080X00202 Bideleux Robert Jeffries Ian 1998 A History of Eastern Europe Crisis and Change Routledge p 366 Beniston Judith Vilain Robert eds 2004 The Austrian Lyric Maney Publishing for the Modern Humanities Research Association p 8 ISBN 978 1 9043 5040 8 Archived from the original on 14 November 2023 Retrieved 14 November 2023 Wierzbieniec Waclaw 28 December 2021 Jewish Self Government in Galicia 1815 1914 Sources on Jewish Self Government in the Polish Lands from Its Inception to the Present Brill pp 283 351 ISBN 978 9 0045 0161 4 archived from the original on 4 June 2024 retrieved 30 June 2024 Charles University Czech Republic 14th Century Faculty Britannica www britannica com Archived from the original on 29 June 2024 Retrieved 30 June 2024 Budisavljevic Srđan Stvaranje Drzave SHS Creation of the state of SHS Zagreb 1958 p 132 133 Nicoară Vincențiu 1890 Transilvania PDF Asociația Transilvană Pentru Literatura Romană și Cultura Poporului Roman in Romanian 3 9 Archived PDF from the original on 9 October 2022 Weigand Gustav 1892 Romania Recueil trimestriel consacre a l etude des langes et des litteratures romanes in French Emile Bouillon pp 240 256 Zbuchea Gheorghe 1999 O istorie a Romanilor din Peninsula Balcanică secolul XVIII XX in Romanian Bucharest Biblioteca Bucureștilor ISBN 978 9 7398 9188 2 Popovici Iosif 1914 Dialectele romane din Istria in Romanian Vol 9 Halle an der Saale pp 21 32 Burada Teodor 1896 O călătorie prin satele romanești din Istria Iași Tipografia Națională pp 119 198 Archived from the original on 1 March 2021 Retrieved 7 September 2020 Spicijaric Paskvan Nina 2014 Vlachs from the Island Krk in the Primary Historical and Literature Sources Studii și Cercetări Actele Simpozionului Banat Istorie și Multiculturalitate in Croatian 345 358 Vital David 1999 A People Apart A Political History of the Jews in Europe 1789 1939 Oxford University Press p 299 ISBN 978 0 1982 1980 4 Zacharia Fareed 2003 The Future of Freedom Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad Norton p 60 Rothenberg 1976 p 118 Rothenberg 1976 p 128 Wyman David S Rosenzveig Charles H The World Reacts to the Holocaust p 474 Braham Randolph L The Politics of Genocide p 5 Hungary Social Changes Countrystudies us Archived from the original on 14 October 2012 Retrieved 19 November 2013 Laszlo Sebok 2012 A magyarorszagi zsidok a szamok tukreben The Jews in Hungary in the light of the numbers in Hungarian Archived from the original on 20 February 2015 Karady Victor Nagy Peter Tabor eds 2012 The numerus clausus in Hungary PDF p 42 Archived PDF from the original on 9 October 2022 Muhlberger Kurt 27 February 2015 The beginnings of the Alma Mater Rudolphina 650 Plus Archived from the original on 1 December 2022 Retrieved 20 June 2019 Strauss Johann 7 July 2016 7 Language and power in the late Ottoman Empire In Murphey Rhoads ed Imperial Lineages and Legacies in the Eastern Mediterranean Recording the Imprint of Roman Byzantine and Ottoman Rule Birmingham Byzantine and Ottoman Studies Vol 18 Routledge p 196 ISBN 978 1 3171 1844 2 Miskolc and the University Archived from the original on 1 March 2012 Retrieved 28 January 2014 Budapesti Muszaki es Gazdasagtudomanyi Egyetem Budapest University of Technology and Economics moveonnet Archived from the original on 19 November 2012 Retrieved 11 June 2012 Kaplan Robert B Richard B Baldauf 2005 Language Planning and Policy in Europe Multilingual Matters p 56 ISBN 978 1 8535 9811 1 Barcsay Thomas 1991 Banking in Hungarian Economic Development 1867 1919 PDF Ryeson Polytechnical Institute p 216 Archived from the original PDF on 17 November 2014 Retrieved 28 August 2016 Sugar amp Hanak 1990 p 262 Publishers Association Booksellers Association of Great Britain and Ireland 1930 The Publisher Vol 133 p 355 Schulze Max Stephan 2000 Patterns of growth and stagnation in the late nineteenth century Habsburg economy PDF European Review of Economic History 4 3 311 340 337 338 doi 10 1017 S1361491600000095 Schulze 2005 p 79 Good David The Economic Rise of the Habsburg Empire Schulze 1996 p 80 Commercial Relations of the United States Reports from the Consuls of the United States on the Commerce Manufactures Etc of Their Consular Districts Publisher U S Government Printing Office 1881 page 371 Davies Norman 24 February 2005 God s Playground A History of Poland Volume II 1795 to the Present Oxford University Press pp 106 108 ISBN 978 0 1992 5340 1 Berend Ivan T 2013 Case Studies on Modern European Economy Entrepreneurship Inventions and Institutions Routledge p 151 ISBN 978 1 1359 1768 5 Fichtner 2009 p 69 Telegraph Vienna Zagreb in Croatian 28 September 2012 Archived from the original on 11 March 2016 Retrieved 11 March 2016 Kiesewetter Herbert Industrielle Revolution in Deutschland Regionen als Wachstumsmotoren Stuttgart Franz Steiner 2004 ISBN 3 5150 8613 7 p 246 Telegraf Lexikon Kislexikon hu Archived from the original on 29 April 2014 Retrieved 25 March 2013 Daniel Szabo Zoltan Fonagy Istvan Szathmari Tunde Csasztvay Kettos kotodes Az Osztrak Magyar Monarchia 1867 1918 Archived from the original on 31 July 2013 Museum of Moslavina Kutina Jasmina Uroda Kutlic Telefon cudo Novoga vijeka Telephone the miracle of Modern era 125 godina telefonije u Hrvatskoj 125 years of Telephony in Croatia in Croatian Archived from the original on 11 March 2016 Retrieved 11 March 2016 HT Muzej Croatian Telecom Museum 125 godina telefonije u Hrvatskoj 125 years of Telephony in Croatia Zagreb 2006 P 2 Telephone History Institute Telecom History Issue 1 Page 14 Thomas Derdak Adele Hast International Directory of Company Histories Volume 5 Page 315 Broadberry amp O Rourke 2010 p 80 Brousek Karl M Die Grossindustrie Bohmens 1848 1918 Munchen Oldenbourg 1987 ISBN 978 3 4865 1871 9 p 31 Mikulas Teich Roy Porter The Industrial Revolution in National Context Europe and the USA p 266 Berend Ivan T 2003 History Derailed Central and Eastern Europe in the Long Nineteenth Century in Hungarian University of California Press p 152 ISBN 978 0 5202 3299 0 Istvan Tisza and Laszlo Kovacs A magyar allami magan es helyierdeku vasuttarsasagok fejlodese 1876 1900 kozott Magyar Vasuttortenet 2 kotet Budapest Kozlekedesi Dokumentacios Kft 58 59 83 84 o ISBN 9 6355 2313 0 1996 English The development of Hungarian private and state owned commuter railway companies between 1876 1900 Hungarian railway History Volume II Tramways in Austria Book Buckley Richard 2000 Tramways and Light Railways of Switzerland and Austria 2nd edition pp 129 135 ISBN 0 9481 0627 1 Tramways in Czech Republic Book Jan Vinar Historicke krovy page 351 Tramways in Poland including Galicia Book Arkadiusz Kolos Uniwersytet Jagiellonski Instytut Geografii i Gospodarki Przestrzennej Rozwoj przestrzenny a wspolczesne funkcjonowanie miejskiego transportu szynowego w Polsce page 19 History of Public Transport in Hungary Book Zsuzsa Frisnyak A magyarorszagi kozlekedes kronikaja 1750 2000 Tramways in Croatia Book Vlado Puljiz Gojko Bezovan Teo Matkovic dr Zoran Sucur Sinisa Zrinscak Socijalna politika Hrvatske Trams and Tramways in Romania Timișoara Arad Bucharest beyondtheforest com Archived from the original on 20 September 2013 Retrieved 19 August 2013 Tramways in Slovakia Book Julius Bartl Slovak History Chronology amp Lexicon p 112 Kogan Page Europe Review 2003 2004 fifth edition Wolden Publishing Ltd 2003 page 174 Archived 14 August 2024 at the Wayback Machine The History of BKV Part 1 Bkv hu 22 November 1918 Archived from the original on 12 March 2013 Retrieved 25 March 2013 UNESCO World Heritage Centre UNESCO World Heritage Centre World Heritage Committee Inscribes 9 New Sites on the World Heritage List whc unesco org Archived from the original on 28 November 2009 Retrieved 10 April 2013 Budapest s Electric Underground Railway Is Still Running After More Than 120 Years IEEE 31 March 2020 Archived from the original on 19 March 2022 Retrieved 8 October 2021 Zmuc Irena 2010 Sustained Interest PDF In Zupanek Bernarda ed Emona Myth and Reality Museum and Galleries of Ljubljana City Museum of Ljubljana p 63 ISBN 978 9 6165 0920 6 Archived from the original PDF on 5 November 2013 Retrieved 19 June 2012 Scott Keltie John 1919 The Statesman s Yearbook Macmillan p 670 Deutschlandfunk Essay und Diskurs Dradio de Archived from the original on 14 September 2011 Retrieved 11 September 2011 Swiggum 2008 Baron Gautsch Members dame at 16 June 1908 Archived from the original on 30 August 2011 Retrieved 11 September 2011 Osterreichischer Lloyd Aeiou at 31 July 2001 Archived from the original on 7 December 2011 Retrieved 11 September 2011 Worthersee Schifffahrt DDSG Blue Danube GmbH Ddsg blue danube at 13 November 2006 Archived from the original on 2 September 2011 Retrieved 11 September 2011 Scott Keltie 1919 p 683 Gunther Rothenburg The Army of Francis Joseph 1976 One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain Headlam James Wycliffe 1911b Austria Hungary In Chisholm Hugh ed Encyclopaedia Britannica Vol 3 11th ed Cambridge University Press p 3 Headlam 1911b p 4 Wheatcroft Andrew 28 April 2009 The Enemy at the Gate Habsburgs Ottomans and the Battle for Europe Basic Books p 264 ISBN 978 0 7867 4454 1 Albrecht Carrie 1973 chapter 6 Austria Britannica Archived from the original on 13 March 2012 Retrieved 24 March 2012 Austria Hungary MSN Encarta Albrecht Carrie 1973 pp 201 214 The Austrian Occupation of Novibazar 1878 1909 Mount HolyOak Archived from the original on 19 January 2012 Retrieved 24 March 2012 Albrecht Carrie 1973 chapter 8 Albrecht Carrie 1973 p 259 272 Gooch 1936 pp 366 438 Wank 2020 Bridge 1972 pp 338 339 Langer European Alliances and Alignments 1871 1890 pp 138 155 6 163 Finestone Jeffrey Massie Robert K 1981 The last courts of Europe Dent p 247 ISBN 978 0 4600 4519 3 Smith David James 2010 One Morning in Sarajevo Hachette UK ISBN 978 0 2978 5608 5 He was photographed on the way to the station and the photograph has been reproduced many times in books and articles claiming to depict the arrest of Gavrilo Princip But there is no photograph of Gavro s arrest this photograph shows the arrest of Behr Djordjevic Dimitrije Richard B Spence 1992 Scholar patriot mentor historical essays in honor of Dimitrije Djordjevic East European Monographs p 313 ISBN 978 0 8803 3217 0 Following the assassination of Franz Ferdinand in June 1914 Catholic Croats and Muslims in Sarajevo joined forces in an anti Serb pogrom Reports Service Southeast Europe series American Universities Field Staff 1964 p 44 Archived from the original on 3 October 2023 Retrieved 7 December 2013 the assassination was followed by officially encouraged anti Serb riots in Sarajevo Gioseffi Daniela 1993 On Prejudice A Global Perspective Anchor Books p 246 ISBN 978 0 3854 6938 8 Retrieved 2 September 2013 Andric describes the Sarajevo frenzy of hate that erupted among Muslims Catholics and Orthodox believers following the assassination on June 28 1914 of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo Mitrovic Andrej 2007 Serbia s Great War 1914 1918 Purdue University Press p 19 ISBN 978 1 5575 3477 4 Tomasevich 2001 p 485 The Bosnian wartime militia Schutzkorps which became known for its persecution of Serbs was overwhelmingly Muslim Schindler John R 2007 Unholy Terror Bosnia Al Qa ida and the Rise of Global Jihad Zenith Imprint p 29 ISBN 978 1 6167 3964 5 Kroll Herbert 28 February 2008 Austrian Greek encounters over the centuries history diplomacy politics arts economics Studienverlag p 55 ISBN 978 3 7065 4526 6 arrested and interned some 5 500 prominent Serbs and sentenced to death some 460 persons a new Schutzkorps an auxiliary militia widened the anti Serb repression Ladislaus Count von Szogyeny Marich Berlin to Leopold Count von Berchtold 5 July 1914 in Ludwig Bittner et al eds Osterreich Ungarns Aussenpolitik von der Bosnischen Krise 1908 bis zum Kriegsausbruch 1914 Austria Hungary s Foreign Policy prior to the Bosnian Crisis of 1908 up to the Outbreak of War in 1914 8 vols Vienna 1930 vol 8 no 10 058 Primary Documents Austrian Ultimatum to Serbia 24 May 2003 Originally published 23 July 1914 Archived from the original on 30 October 2004 Retrieved 29 September 2019 Clark Christopher 2013 The Sleepwalkers How Europe Went to War in 1914 pp 420 430 Pribram A F 1923 Austrian Foreign Policy 1908 18 pp 68 128 Zeman Z A B Zbynek Anthony Bohuslav 1971 A Diplomatic History of the First World War Weidenfeld and Nicolson pp 121 161 OL 5388162M Stevenson David 1988 The First World War and International Politics pp 139 148 OL 21170640M Stevenson David 1991 The failure of peace by negotiation in 1917 PDF Historical Journal 34 1 65 86 doi 10 1017 S0018246X00013935 S2CID 154930518 Archived PDF from the original on 26 May 2023 Retrieved 9 May 2023 Keleher Edward P 1992 Emperor Karl and the Sixtus Affair Politico Nationalist Repercussions in the Reich German and Austro German Camps and the Disintegration of Habsburg Austria 1916 1918 East European Quarterly 26 2 163ff Schulze Max Stephan 2005 Austria Hungary s economy in World War I PDF In Broadberry Stephen Harrison Mark eds The Economics of World War I Cambridge University Press p 95 doi 10 1017 CBO9780511497339 002 ISBN 978 0 5218 5212 8 S2CID 16455027 Archived from the original PDF on 29 September 2018 Retrieved 6 June 2018 Kann Robert A et al eds 1977 The Habsburg Empire in World War I Essays on the Intellectual Military Political and Economic Aspects of the Habsburg War Effort Mowat C L Charles Loch 1968 The New Cambridge Modern History volume xii Cambridge University Press Archive London Cambridge University Press p 479 ISBN 978 0 5210 4551 3 Kappeler Andreas 2014 The Russian Empire A Multi ethnic History Routledge p 287 ISBN 978 1 3175 6810 0 Cirkovic Sima M 2008 The Serbs Volume 10 of The Peoples of Europe John Wiley amp Sons p 235 ISBN 978 1 4051 4291 5 Rotar Marius 2013 History of Modern Cremation in Romania Cambridge Scholars Publishing p 24 ISBN 978 1 4438 4542 7 Broadberry amp O Rourke 2010 p 70 Stevenson David 2011 With Our Backs to the Wall Victory and Defeat in 1918 Harvard University Press p 399 ISBN 978 0 6740 6319 8 Healy Maureen 2007 Vienna and the Fall of the Habsburg Empire Total War and Everyday Life in World War I Banac Ivo 1992 Emperor Karl Has Become a Comitadji The Croatian Disturbances of Autumn 1918 Slavonic and East European Review 70 2 284 305 Tucker Spencer 1996 The European Powers in the First World War Taylor amp Francis p 173 ISBN 978 0 8153 0399 2 Watson 2014 French forces occupy Corfu 2011 Burgwyn H James 1997 Italian foreign policy in the interwar period 1918 1940 Greenwood Publishing Group p 4 ISBN 978 0 2759 4877 1 Schindler John R 2001 Isonzo The Forgotten Sacrifice of the Great War Cavallaro Gaetano V 2010 The Beginning of Futility Diplomatic Political Military and Naval Events on the Austro Italian Front in the First World War 1914 1917 Vol I Xlibris Corporation p 339 ISBN 978 1 4010 8426 4 Lowry Bullitt 2000 Armistice 1918 Kent State University Press p 112 ISBN 978 0 8733 8651 7 Archived from the original on 27 January 2024 Retrieved 19 November 2023 Torrey Glenn E 1998 Romania and World War I Histria Books Shanafelt Gary W April 1999 Review of Torrey Glenn E Romania and World War I A Collection of Studies HABSBURG H Net Reviews Archived from the original on 5 March 2023 Retrieved 25 September 2019 See 1910 census Buranbaeva Oksana Mladineo Vanja 2011 Culture and Customs of Hungary Cultures and Customs of the World Bonn Germany ABC CLIO p 32 ISBN 978 0 3133 8370 0 Bassett Richard 2015 For God and Kaiser The Imperial Austrian Army 1619 1918 Yale University Press p 506 ISBN 978 0 3001 7858 6 Uyar Mesut 2015 Review of Austro Hungarian War Aims in the Balkans during World War I Reviews in History doi 10 14296 RiH 2014 1846 Watson 2014 p 536 Watson 2014 pp 536 540 Nagy 2006 Giant Tibor October 1996 Through the Prism of the Habsburg Monarchy Hungary in American Diplomacy and Public Opinion During the First World War pdf thesis University of Warwick pp 81 82 Archived from the original on 14 August 2024 Watson 2014 pp 541 542 Cornelius Deborah S 2011 Hungary in World War II Caught in the Cauldron Fordham University Press pp 9 10 ISBN 978 0 8232 3343 4 Archived from the original on 10 November 2023 Retrieved 2 December 2023 Watson 2014 pp 542 556 The 1918 Karl s proclamation Archived 8 March 2021 at the Wayback Machine British Library Stangl Andrea 21 June 2014 The successor states to the Austro Hungarian Monarchy habsburger net Archived from the original on 5 June 2023 Retrieved 3 March 2021 Die amtliche Meldung uber den Rucktritt in German Neue Freie Presse Morgenblatt 24 August 1919 p 2 Archived from the original on 26 December 2015 Retrieved 2 June 2017 Trianon Treaty of The Columbia Encyclopedia 2012 Archived from the original on 28 December 2008 Retrieved 28 August 2016 Tucker Spencer Priscilla Mary Roberts 2005 Encyclopedia of World War I 1st ed ABC CLIO p 1183 ISBN 978 1 8510 9420 2 Virtually the entire population of what remained of Hungary regarded the Treaty of Trianon as manifestly unfair and agitation for revision began immediately Williamson 1991 p 63 Through the occupation Austria Hungary became a colonial power Sources Albrecht Carrie Rene 1973 1958 A Diplomatic History of Europe Since the Congress of Vienna Revised ed Harper amp Row ISBN 0 0604 0171 0 OL 21992200M Austria Hungary MSN Encarta 28 August 2009 Archived from the original on 28 August 2009 Bridge Francis Roy 1972 From Sadowa to Sarajevo the foreign policy of Austria Hungary 1866 1914 OL 22077590M Broadberry Stephen O Rourke Kevin H 2010 The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Europe Volume 2 1870 to the Present Cambridge University Press ISBN 978 1 1394 8951 5 Citype Internet Portal Betriebsges m b H Austro Hungarian Empire k u k Monarchy dual monarchic Habsburg Emperors of Austria Wien vienna com Archived from the original on 23 November 2011 Retrieved 11 September 2011 Fichtner Paula Sutter 2009 Historical Dictionary of Austria Historical Dictionaries of Europe 2nd ed ISBN 978 0 8108 5592 2 January 11 1916 French forces occupy Corfu History com Archived from the original on 23 June 2011 Retrieved 11 September 2011 via History com This Day in History Gabor Jan 17 18 May 2010 Slovakia Hungary Relations in the European Union PDF Suedosteuropa gesellschaft com Archived from the original PDF on 20 March 2012 Retrieved 19 November 2013 Kann Robert A 1974 A History of the Habsburg Empire 1526 1918 University of California Press highly detailed history emphasis on ethnicityMinahan James 1998 Miniature Empires A Historical Dictionary of the Newly Independent States Bloomsbury Academic ISBN 978 0 3133 0610 5 OL 489895W Nagy Miklos 6 September 2006 Hungarian foreign ministers from 1848 to our days Ministry for Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Hungary Archived from the original on 21 June 2006 Retrieved 28 August 2016 via Mfa gov hu Roman Eric 2003 Austria Hungary amp the Successor States A Reference Guide from the Renaissance to the Present Rothenberg Gunther E 1976 The Army of Francis Joseph Purdue University PressSked Alan 1989 The Decline and Fall of the Habsburg Empire 1815 1918 London Longman Staatsgrundgesetz uber die allgemeinen Rechte und Staatsburger fur die im Reichsrate vertretenen Konigreiche und Lander Basic Law on the General Rights of Nationals of the Kingdoms and Lander represented in the Council of the Realm in German 21 December 1867 Archived from the original on 12 June 2024 Retrieved 24 December 2024 Sugar Peter F Hanak Peter eds 1990 A History of Hungary Swiggum Sue 3 May 2008 Unione Austriaca Austro Americana Cosulich Line Theshipslist com Archived from the original on 1 October 2011 Retrieved 11 September 2011 Taylor A J P 1964 The Habsburg monarchy 1809 1918 a history of the Austrian Empire and Austria Hungary 2nd ed London Penguin Books politics and diplomacy Tomasevich Jozo 2001 War and Revolution in Yugoslavia 1941 1945 Stanford University Press ISBN 978 0 8047 7924 1 Archived from the original on 17 February 2024 Retrieved 4 December 2013 Wank Solomon 2020 In the Twilight of Empire Count Alois Lexa von Aehrenthal 1854 1912 Imperial Habsburg Patriot and Statesman Vol 2 From Foreign Minister in Waiting to de facto Chancellor Vandenhoeck amp Ruprecht Watson Alexander 2014 Ring of Steel Germany and Austria Hungary at War 1914 1918 Basic Books ISBN 978 0 4650 9488 2 Williamson Samuel R 1991 Austria Hungary and the Origins of the First World War doi 10 1007 978 1 349 21163 0 ISBN 978 0 3334 2081 2 Worthersee Schifffahrt Archived from the original on 28 March 2009 Retrieved 28 August 2016 Further reading Analysis Austria s troubled history BBC News 3 February 2000 Archived from the original on 23 June 2011 Retrieved 19 August 2010 Armour Ian D 2009 Apple of Discord Austria Hungary Serbia and the Bosnian Question 1867 71 Slavonic and East European Review 87 4 629 680 doi 10 1353 see 2009 0004 JSTOR 40650848 S2CID 151977197 Bagger Eugene S 1927 Francis Joseph emperor of Austria King of Hungary OCLC 1149195550 OL 13524274M Cipolla Carlo M ed 1973 The Emergence of Industrial Societies vol 4 part 1 Glasgow Fontana Economic History of Europe pp 228 278 online Brauneder Wilhelm 2009 Osterreichische Verfassungsgeschichte in German 11th ed Vienna Manzsche Verlags und Universitatsbuchhandlung ISBN 978 3 2141 4876 8 Cornwall Mark ed 2002 The Last Years of Austria Hungary Essays in political and military history 1908 1918 University of Exeter Press ISBN 0 8598 9563 7 OCLC 1150075157 OL 1313375M Dzaja Srecko M 1994 Bosnien Herzegowina in der osterreichisch ungarischen Epoche 1878 1918 in German Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag ISBN 3 4865 6079 4 Evans R J W 2008 Austria Hungary and the Habsburgs Central Europe c 1683 1867 Oxford University Press doi 10 1093 acprof oso 9780199541621 001 0001 ISBN 978 0 1995 4162 1 OL 28444909M Good David The Economic Rise of the Habsburg Empire 1984 Herman Arthur What Life Was Like At Empire s End Austro Hungarian Empire 1848 1918 Time Life 2000 Hoke Rudolf 1996 Osterreichische und deutsche Rechtsgeschichte in German 2nd ed Vienna Bohlau Studienbucher ISBN 3 2059 8179 0 Jelavich Barbara Modern Austria Empire and Republic 1815 1986 Cambridge University Press 1987 pp 72 150 Judson Pieter M 2016 The Habsburg Empire pp 264 436 doi 10 4159 9780674969346 ISBN 978 0 6749 6934 6 S2CID 167195732 Johnston William M The Austrian Mind An Intellectual and Social History 1848 1938 University of California Press 1972 Macartney Carlile Aylmer The Habsburg Empire 1790 1918 New York Macmillan 1969 Mason John W The Dissolution of the Austro Hungarian Empire 1867 1918 Routledge 2014 May Arthur J The Hapsburg Monarchy 1867 1914 Harvard University Press 1951 online Milward Alan and S B Saul The Development of the Economies of Continental Europe 1850 1914 1977 pp 271 331 online Mitchell A 2018 The Grand Strategy of the Habsburg Empire doi 10 23943 9781400889969 ISBN 978 1 4008 8996 9 S2CID 239313989 Archived from the original on 9 June 2023 Retrieved 23 August 2020 Palmer Alan Twilight of the Habsburgs The Life and Times of Emperor Francis Joseph New York Weidenfeld amp Nicolson 1995 ISBN 0 8711 3665 1 Pribram Alfred Francis 1922 Austrian Empire In Chisholm Hugh ed Encyclopaedia Britannica Vol 30 12th ed London amp New York The Encyclopaedia Britannica Company pp 313 343 Redlich Joseph Emperor Francis Joseph Of Austria New York Macmillan 1929 online free Rudolph Richard L Banking and industrialization in Austria Hungary the role of banks in the industrialization of the Czech crownlands 1873 1914 1976 online Sauer Walter Habsburg Colonial Austria Hungary s Role in European Overseas Expansion Reconsidered Austrian Studies 2012 20 5 23 ONLINE Archived 5 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine Steed Henry Wickham et al 1914 A Short History of Austria Hungary and Poland Encyclopaedia Britannica Company p 145 Tschuppik Karl The reign of the Emperor Fransis Joseph 1930 online Turnock David Eastern Europe An Historical Geography 1815 1945 1989 Usher Roland G Austro German Relations Since 1866 American Historical Review 23 3 1918 577 595 online Vardy Steven and Agnes Vardy The Austro Hungarian mind at home and abroad East European Monographs 1989 Vermes Gabor The Impact of the Dual Alliance on the Magyars of the Austro Hungarian Monarchy East Central Europe 1980 vol 7 DOI 10 1163 187633080x00211 Who s Who Emperor Franz Josef I First World War com Archived from the original on 10 May 2009 Retrieved 5 May 2009 Zovko Ljubomir 2007 Studije iz pravne povijesti Bosne i Hercegovine 1878 1941 in Croatian University of Mostar ISBN 978 9 9589 2712 6 World war Bassett Richard For God and Kaiser The Imperial Austrian Army 1619 1918 2016 Boyer John W 2003 Silent War and Bitter Peace The Revolution of 1918 in Austria PDF Austrian History Yearbook 34 1 56 doi 10 1017 S0067237800020427 S2CID 145716467 Archived from the original PDF on 11 February 2020 Cornwall Mark 1992 News Rumour and the Control of Information in Austria Hungary 1914 1918 History 77 249 50 64 doi 10 1111 j 1468 229X 1992 tb02392 x Cornwall Mark 2000 The Undermining of Austria Hungary doi 10 1057 9780230286351 ISBN 978 1 3494 2240 1 Craig Gordon A 1965 The World War I Alliance of the Central Powers in Retrospect The Military Cohesion of the Alliance The Journal of Modern History 37 3 336 344 doi 10 1086 600693 JSTOR 1875406 S2CID 154381768 Crankshaw Edward The Fall of the House of Habsburg Viking 1963 pp 449 Deak John and Jonathan E Gumz How to Break a State The Habsburg Monarchy s Internal War 1914 1918 American Historical Review 122 4 2017 1105 1136 online Archived 16 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine Dedijer Vladimir 1966 The Road to Sarajevo Gratz Gusztav Schuller Richard 1928 The economic policy of Austria Hungary during the war in its external relations Yale University Press OCLC 1065632 OL 6715012M Healy Maureen 2007 Vienna and the Fall of the Habsburg Empire Total War and Everyday Life in World War I Herweg Holger H 2009 The First World War Germany and Austria Hungary 1914 1918 Jaszi Oszkar 1966 The Dissolution of the Habsburg Monarchy University of Chicago Press online Jung Peter 2003 The Austro Hungarian Forces in World War I 2 Bloomsbury USA ISBN 1 8417 6594 5 Kann Robert A et al eds 1977 The Habsburg Empire in World War I Essays on the Intellectual Military Political and Economic Aspects of the Habsburg War Effort East European Quarterly ISBN 0 9147 1016 8 Katzenstein Peter J 1976 Disjoined partners Austria and Germany since 1815 University of California Press ISBN 978 0 5200 2945 3 Kapp Richard W 1984 Divided Loyalties The German Reich and Austria Hungary in Austro German Discussions of War Aims 1914 1916 Central European History 17 2 3 120 139 doi 10 1017 S0008938900016435 S2CID 96478651 Kronenbitter Gunther Pre war Military Planning Austria Hungary online Archived 5 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine Rauchensteiner Manfried 2014 The First World War and the End of the Habsburg Monarchy 1914 1918 Wien Koln Weimar Bohlau Verlag ISBN 978 3 2057 9588 9 Sked Alan Austria Hungary and the First World War Histoire Politique 1 2014 16 49 Online Archived 1 June 2022 at the Wayback Machine Tunstall Graydon A Austro Hungarian Army and the First World War Cambridge University Press 2021 online review Archived 12 December 2022 at the Wayback Machine Vermes Gabor Istvan Tisza The Liberal Vision and Conservative Statecraft of a Magyar Nationalist Columbia University Press 1986 online review Archived 5 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine Wawro Geoffrey 2014 A Mad Catastrophe The Outbreak of World War I and the Collapse of the Habsburg Empire Zametica John 2017 Folly and malice the Habsburg empire the Balkans and the start of World War One London Shepheard Walwyn p 416 Primary sources Austro Hungarian Monarchy Austro Hungarian red book 1915 English translations of official documents to justify the war online Baedeker Karl 1906 Austria Hungary Including Dalmatia and Bosnia Handbook for Travellers Bulletin of the American Geographical Society 38 3 208 doi 10 2307 197930 hdl 2027 mdp 39015004037399 JSTOR 197930 Gooch G P Recent Revelations of European Diplomacy 1940 pp 103 159 summarizes memoirs of major participants Steed Henry Wickham The Hapsburg monarchy 1919 online detailed contemporary accountHistoriography and memory Boyd Kelly ed Encyclopedia of Historians and Historical Writers Rutledge 1999 1 60 63 historiography Deak John 2014 The Great War and the Forgotten Realm The Habsburg Monarchy and the First World War The Journal of Modern History 86 2 336 380 doi 10 1086 675880 S2CID 143481172 Korner Axel Beyond Nation States New Perspectives on the Habsburg Empire European History Quarterly 48 3 2018 516 533 online Archived 5 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine Kozuchowski Adam 2013 The Afterlife of Austria Hungary doi 10 2307 j ctt7zw9vt ISBN 978 0 8229 7917 3 Kwan Jonathan 2011 Review Article Nationalism and all that Reassessing the Habsburg Monarchy and its legacy European History Quarterly 41 88 108 doi 10 1177 0265691410386424 S2CID 143745426 Archived from the original on 22 February 2023 Retrieved 26 May 2021 Sked Alan Explaining the Habsburg Empire 1830 90 in Pamela Pilbeam ed Themes in Modern European History 1830 1890 Routledge 2002 pp 141 176 Sked Alan Austria Hungary and the First World War Histoire Politique 1 2014 16 49 online free Archived 31 August 2018 at the Wayback Machine historiographyIn German Geographischer Atlas zur Vaterlandskunde an der osterreichischen Mittelschulen ed Rudolf Rothaug K u k Hof Kartographische Anstalt G Freytag amp Berndt Vienna 1911 External linksWikivoyage has a travel guide for Austro Hungarian Empire Wikimedia Commons has media related to Austria Hungary Articles relating to Austria Hungary at the International Encyclopedia of the First World War Habsburg Empire Austrian line Microsoft Encarta The height of the dual monarchy Archived 31 October 2009 The Austro Hungarian Military Heraldry of the Austro Hungarian Empire Austria Hungary at the Wayback Machine archived 12 January 2008 extensive list of heads of state ministers and ambassadors History of Austro Hungarian currency Austria Hungary Dual Monarchy Map of Europe and the collapse of Austria Hungary at omniatlas com Mangham Arthur Neal The Social Bases of Austrian Politics The German Electoral Districts of Cisleithania 1900 1914 Ph D thesis 1974 Austro Hungarian Land Forces 1848 1918 Archived 28 May 2014 at the Wayback Machine Oldphoto info Austro Hungarian Imperial and Royal Army HABSBURG is an email discussion list dealing with the culture and history of the Habsburg monarchy and its successor states in central Europe since 1500 with discussions syllabi book reviews queries conferences edited daily by scholars since 1994 48 12 27 N 16 21 54 E 48 20750 N 16 36500 E 48 20750 16 36500
