World War I

Author: www.NiNa.Az
Mar 15, 2025 / 01:40

World War I or the First World War 28 July 1914 11 November 1918 also known as the Great War was a global conflict betwe

World War I
World War I
World War I

World War I or the First World War (28 July 1914 – 11 November 1918), also known as the Great War, was a global conflict between two coalitions: the Allies (or Entente) and the Central Powers. Fighting took place mainly in Europe and the Middle East, as well as in parts of Africa and the Asia-Pacific, and in Europe was characterised by trench warfare; the widespread use of artillery, machine guns, and chemical weapons (gas); and the introductions of tanks and aircraft. World War I was one of the deadliest conflicts in history, resulting in an estimated 10 million military dead and more than 20 million wounded, plus some 10 million civilian dead from causes including genocide. The movement of large numbers of people was a major factor in the deadly Spanish flu pandemic.

World War I
image
image
image
image
image
image
From top to bottom, left to right:
  • French attack from a trench at the Battle of Verdun, 1916
  • British artillery in action at the Battle of the Somme, 1916
  • U.S. troops and Renault FT tanks during the Hundred Days Offensive, 1918
  • British Vickers machine gun crew wearing gas masks during the Battle of the Somme, 1916
  • Ottoman Arab camel corps leaving for the Middle Eastern front, 1916
  • Aftermath of the Russian siege of Przemyśl in Austria-Hungary, 1915
Date28 July 1914 – 11 November 1918
(4 years, 3 months and 14 days)
Location
  • Europe
  • Middle East
  • Africa
  • Pacific
  • Atlantic
  • Mediterranean and Adriatic
Result Allied Powers victory (see Aftermath of World War I)
Territorial
changes
  • Partition of the Ottoman Empire, dissolution of Austria-Hungary, transfer of German colonies and territories to other countries
  • Formation of new countries in Europe and the Middle East, such as Poland, Yugoslavia, Weimar Germany, Soviet Russia and Soviet Union, Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia, Austria, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Turkey, Hejaz, and Yemen
Belligerents
Allied Powers:
 and Empire:
  • image Australia
  • image Canada
  • image Ceylon
  • image Egypt
  • image Newfoundland
  • image New Zealand
  • image India
  • image South Africa
and others ...
Central Powers:
and others ...
Commanders and leaders
See Main Allied leaders See Main Central leaders
Casualties and losses
  • Military dead:
  • Over 5,525,000
  • Civilian dead:
  • Over 4,000,000
  • Total dead:
  • Over 9,000,000
  • ...further details
  • Military dead:
  • Over 4,386,000
  • Civilian dead:
  • Over 3,700,000
  • Total dead:
  • Over 8,000,000
  • ...further details

The causes of World War I included the rise of Germany and decline of the Ottoman Empire, which disturbed the long-standing balance of power in Europe, as well as economic competition between nations triggered by industrialisation and imperialism. Growing tensions between the great powers and in the Balkans reached a breaking point on 28 June 1914, when a Bosnian Serb assassinated the heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne. Austria-Hungary blamed Serbia, and declared war on 28 July. After Russia mobilised in Serbia's defence, Germany declared war on Russia and France, who had an alliance. The United Kingdom entered after Germany invaded Belgium, whose neutrality it guaranteed, and the Ottomans joined the Central Powers in November. Germany's strategy in 1914 was to quickly defeat France then transfer its forces to the east, but its advance was halted in September, and by the end of the year the Western Front consisted of a continuous line of trenches stretching from the English Channel to Switzerland. The Eastern Front was more dynamic, but neither side gained a decisive advantage, despite costly offensives. Italy, Bulgaria, Romania, Greece and others joined in from 1915 onward.

Major battles, including at Verdun, the Somme, and Passchendaele, failed to break the stalemate on the Western Front. In April 1917, the United States joined the Allies after Germany resumed unrestricted submarine warfare against Atlantic shipping. Later that year, the Bolsheviks seized power in Russia in the October Revolution; Soviet Russia signed an armistice with the Central Powers in December, followed by a separate peace in March 1918. That month, Germany launched a spring offensive in the west, which despite initial successes left the German Army exhausted and demoralised. The Allied Hundred Days Offensive beginning in August 1918 caused a collapse of the German front line. By early November, Bulgaria, the Ottoman Empire and Austria-Hungary had each signed armistices with the Allies, leaving Germany isolated. Facing a revolution at home, Kaiser Wilhelm II abdicated on 9 November, and the war ended with the Armistice of 11 November 1918.

The Paris Peace Conference of 1919–1920 imposed settlements on the defeated powers, most notably the Treaty of Versailles, by which Germany lost significant territories, was disarmed, and was required to pay large war reparations to the Allies. The dissolution of the Russian, German, Austro-Hungarian, and Ottoman Empires redrew national boundaries and resulted in the creation of new independent states, including Poland, Finland, the Baltic states, Czechoslovakia, and Yugoslavia. The League of Nations was established to maintain world peace, but its failure to manage instability during the interwar period contributed to the outbreak of World War II in 1939.

Names

Before World War II, the events of 1914–1918 were generally known as the Great War or simply the World War. In August 1914, the magazine The Independent wrote "This is the Great War. It names itself". In October 1914, the Canadian magazine Maclean's similarly wrote, "Some wars name themselves. This is the Great War." Contemporary Europeans also referred to it as "the war to end war" and it was also described as "the war to end all wars" due to their perception of its unparalleled scale, devastation, and loss of life. The first recorded use of the term First World War was in September 1914 by German biologist and philosopher Ernst Haeckel who stated, "There is no doubt that the course and character of the feared 'European War' ... will become the first world war in the full sense of the word."

Background

Political and military alliances

image
Rival military coalitions in 1914:
  Triple Entente
  Triple Alliance

For much of the 19th century, the major European powers maintained a tenuous balance of power, known as the Concert of Europe. After 1848, this was challenged by Britain's withdrawal into so-called splendid isolation, the decline of the Ottoman Empire, New Imperialism, and the rise of Prussia under Otto von Bismarck. Victory in the 1870–1871 Franco-Prussian War allowed Bismarck to consolidate a German Empire. Post-1871, the primary aim of French policy was to avenge this defeat, but by the early 1890s, this had switched to the expansion of the French colonial empire.

In 1873, Bismarck negotiated the League of the Three Emperors, which included Austria-Hungary, Russia, and Germany. After the 1877–1878 Russo-Turkish War, the League was dissolved due to Austrian concerns over the expansion of Russian influence in the Balkans, an area they considered to be of vital strategic interest. Germany and Austria-Hungary then formed the 1879 Dual Alliance, which became the Triple Alliance when Italy joined in 1882. For Bismarck, the purpose of these agreements was to isolate France by ensuring the three empires resolved any disputes between themselves. In 1887, Bismarck set up the Reinsurance Treaty, a secret agreement between Germany and Russia to remain neutral if either were attacked by France or Austria-Hungary.

image
World empires and colonies c. 1914

For Bismarck, peace with Russia was the foundation of German foreign policy, but in 1890, he was forced to retire by Wilhelm II. The latter was persuaded not to renew the Reinsurance Treaty by his new Chancellor, Leo von Caprivi. This gave France an opening to agree to the Franco-Russian Alliance in 1894, which was then followed by the 1904 Entente Cordiale with Britain. The Triple Entente was completed by the 1907 Anglo-Russian Convention. While not formal alliances, by settling longstanding colonial disputes in Asia and Africa, British support for France or Russia in any future conflict became a possibility. This was accentuated by British and Russian support for France against Germany during the 1911 Agadir Crisis.

Arms race

image
SMS Rheinland, a Nassau-class battleship, Germany's first response to the British Dreadnought, 1910

German economic and industrial strength continued to expand rapidly post-1871. Backed by Wilhelm II, Admiral Alfred von Tirpitz sought to use this growth to build an Imperial German Navy, that could compete with the British Royal Navy. This policy was based on the work of US naval author Alfred Thayer Mahan, who argued that possession of a blue-water navy was vital for global power projection; Tirpitz had his books translated into German, while Wilhelm made them required reading for his advisors and senior military personnel.

However, it was also an emotional decision, driven by Wilhelm's simultaneous admiration for the Royal Navy and desire to surpass it. Bismarck thought that the British would not interfere in Europe, as long as its maritime supremacy remained secure, but his dismissal in 1890 led to a change in policy and an Anglo-German naval arms race began. Despite the vast sums spent by Tirpitz, the launch of HMS Dreadnought in 1906 gave the British a technological advantage. Ultimately, the race diverted huge resources into creating a German navy large enough to antagonise Britain, but not defeat it; in 1911, Chancellor Theobald von Bethmann Hollweg acknowledged defeat, leading to the Rüstungswende or 'armaments turning point', when he switched expenditure from the navy to the army.

This decision was not driven by a reduction in political tensions but by German concern over Russia's quick recovery from its defeat in the Russo-Japanese War and subsequent 1905 Russian Revolution. Economic reforms led to a significant post-1908 expansion of railways and transportation infrastructure, particularly in its western border regions. Since Germany and Austria-Hungary relied on faster mobilisation to compensate for their numerical inferiority compared to Russia, the threat posed by the closing of this gap was more important than competing with the Royal Navy. After Germany expanded its standing army by 170,000 troops in 1913, France extended compulsory military service from two to three years; similar measures were taken by the Balkan powers and Italy, which led to increased expenditure by the Ottomans and Austria-Hungary. Absolute figures are difficult to calculate due to differences in categorising expenditure since they often omit civilian infrastructure projects like railways which had logistical importance and military use. It is known, however, that from 1908 to 1913, military spending by the six major European powers increased by over 50% in real terms.

Conflicts in the Balkans

image
Ethno-linguistic map of Austria-Hungary, 1910. Bosnia-Herzegovina was annexed in 1908.
image
Sarajevo citizens reading a poster with the proclamation of the Austrian annexation in 1908

The years before 1914 were marked by a series of crises in the Balkans, as other powers sought to benefit from the Ottoman decline. While Pan-Slavic and Orthodox Russia considered itself the protector of Serbia and other Slav states, they preferred the strategically vital Bosporus straits to be controlled by a weak Ottoman government, rather than an ambitious Slav power like Bulgaria. Russia had ambitions in northeastern Anatolia while its clients had overlapping claims in the Balkans. These competing interests divided Russian policy-makers and added to regional instability.

Austrian statesmen viewed the Balkans as essential for the continued existence of their Empire and saw Serbian expansion as a direct threat. The 1908–1909 Bosnian Crisis began when Austria annexed the former Ottoman territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which it had occupied since 1878. Timed to coincide with the Bulgarian Declaration of Independence from the Ottoman Empire, this unilateral action was denounced by the European powers, but accepted as there was no consensus on how to resolve the situation. Some historians see this as a significant escalation, ending any chance of Austria cooperating with Russia in the Balkans, while also damaging diplomatic relations between Serbia and Italy.

Tensions increased after the 1911–1912 Italo-Turkish War demonstrated Ottoman weakness and led to the formation of the Balkan League, an alliance of Serbia, Bulgaria, Montenegro, and Greece. The League quickly overran most of the Ottomans' territory in the Balkans during the 1912–1913 First Balkan War, much to the surprise of outside observers. The Serbian capture of ports on the Adriatic resulted in partial Austrian mobilisation, starting on 21 November 1912, including units along the Russian border in Galicia. The Russian government decided not to mobilise in response, unprepared to precipitate a war.

The Great Powers sought to re-assert control through the 1913 Treaty of London, which had created an independent Albania while enlarging the territories of Bulgaria, Serbia, Montenegro and Greece. However, disputes between the victors sparked the 33-day Second Balkan War, when Bulgaria attacked Serbia and Greece on 16 June 1913; it was defeated, losing most of Macedonia to Serbia and Greece, and Southern Dobruja to Romania. The result was that even countries which benefited from the Balkan Wars, such as Serbia and Greece, felt cheated of their "rightful gains", while for Austria it demonstrated the apparent indifference with which other powers viewed their concerns, including Germany. This complex mix of resentment, nationalism and insecurity helps explain why the pre-1914 Balkans became known as the "powder keg of Europe".

Prelude

Sarajevo assassination

image
Traditionally thought to show the arrest of Gavrilo Princip (right), this photo is now believed by historians to depict an innocent bystander, Ferdinand Behr on 28 June 1914.

On 28 June 1914, Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria, heir presumptive to Emperor Franz Joseph I of Austria, visited Sarajevo, the capital of the recently annexed Bosnia and Herzegovina. Cvjetko Popović, Gavrilo Princip, Nedeljko Čabrinović, Trifko Grabež, Vaso Čubrilović (Bosnian Serbs) and Muhamed Mehmedbašić (from the Bosniaks community), from the movement known as Young Bosnia, took up positions along the Archduke's motorcade route, to assassinate him. Supplied with arms by extremists within the Serbian Black Hand intelligence organisation, they hoped his death would free Bosnia from Austrian rule.

Čabrinović threw a grenade at the Archduke's car and injured two of his aides. The other assassins were also unsuccessful. An hour later, as Ferdinand was returning from visiting the injured officers in hospital, his car took a wrong turn into a street where Gavrilo Princip was standing. He fired two pistol shots, fatally wounding Ferdinand and his wife Sophie.

According to historian Zbyněk Zeman, in Vienna "the event almost failed to make any impression whatsoever. On 28 and 29 June, the crowds listened to music and drank wine, as if nothing had happened." Nevertheless, the impact of the murder of the heir to the throne was significant, and has been described by historian Christopher Clark as a "9/11 effect, a terrorist event charged with historic meaning, transforming the political chemistry in Vienna".

Expansion of violence in Bosnia and Herzegovina

image
Crowds on the streets in the aftermath of the anti-Serb riots in Sarajevo, 29 June 1914

Austro-Hungarian authorities encouraged subsequent anti-Serb riots in Sarajevo. Violent actions against ethnic Serbs were also organised outside Sarajevo, in other cities in Austro-Hungarian-controlled Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia and Slovenia. Austro-Hungarian authorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina imprisoned approximately 5,500 prominent Serbs, 700 to 2,200 of whom died in prison. A further 460 Serbs were sentenced to death. A predominantly Bosniak special militia known as the Schutzkorps was established, and carried out the persecution of Serbs.

July Crisis

image
Cheering crowds in London and Paris on the day war was declared.

The assassination initiated the July Crisis, a month of diplomatic manoeuvring between Austria-Hungary, Germany, Russia, France and Britain. Believing that Serbian intelligence helped organise Franz Ferdinand's murder, Austrian officials wanted to use the opportunity to end their interference in Bosnia and saw war as the best way of achieving this. However, the Foreign Ministry had no solid proof of Serbian involvement. On 23 July, Austria delivered an ultimatum to Serbia, listing ten demands made intentionally unacceptable to provide an excuse for starting hostilities.

Serbia ordered general mobilisation on 25 July, but accepted all the terms, except for those empowering Austrian representatives to suppress "subversive elements" inside Serbia, and take part in the investigation and trial of Serbians linked to the assassination. Claiming this amounted to rejection, Austria broke off diplomatic relations and ordered partial mobilisation the next day; on 28 July, they declared war on Serbia and began shelling Belgrade. Russia ordered general mobilisation in support of Serbia on 30 July.

Anxious to ensure backing from the SPD political opposition by presenting Russia as the aggressor, German Chancellor Bethmann Hollweg delayed the commencement of war preparations until 31 July. That afternoon, the Russian government were handed a note requiring them to "cease all war measures against Germany and Austria-Hungary" within 12 hours. A further German demand for neutrality was refused by the French who ordered but delayed declaring war. The German General Staff had long assumed they faced a war on two fronts; the Schlieffen Plan envisaged using 80% of the army to defeat France, then switching to Russia. Since this required them to move quickly, mobilisation orders were issued that afternoon. Once the German ultimatum to Russia expired on the morning of 1 August, the two countries were at war.

At a meeting on 29 July, the British cabinet had narrowly decided its obligations to Belgium under the 1839 Treaty of London did not require it to oppose a German invasion with military force; however, Prime Minister Asquith and his senior Cabinet ministers were already committed to supporting France, the Royal Navy had been mobilised, and public opinion was strongly in favour of intervention. On 31 July, Britain sent notes to Germany and France, asking them to respect Belgian neutrality; France pledged to do so, but Germany did not reply. Aware of German plans to attack through Belgium, French Commander-in-Chief Joseph Joffre asked his government for permission to cross the border and pre-empt such a move. To avoid violating Belgian neutrality, he was told any advance could come only after a German invasion. Instead, the French cabinet ordered its Army to withdraw 10 km behind the German frontier, to avoid provoking war. On 2 August, Germany occupied Luxembourg and exchanged fire with French units when German patrols entered French territory; on 3 August, they declared war on France and demanded free passage across Belgium, which was refused. Early on the morning of 4 August, the Germans invaded, and Albert I of Belgium called for assistance under the Treaty of London. Britain sent Germany an ultimatum demanding they withdraw from Belgium; when this expired at midnight, without a response, the two empires were at war.

Progress of the war

Opening hostilities

Confusion among the Central Powers

Germany promised to support Austria-Hungary's invasion of Serbia, but interpretations of what this meant differed. Previously tested deployment plans had been replaced early in 1914, but those had never been tested in exercises. Austro-Hungarian leaders believed Germany would cover its northern flank against Russia.

Serbian campaign

image
Serbian Army Blériot XI "Oluj", 1915

Beginning on 12 August, the Austrians and Serbs clashed at the battles of the Cer and Kolubara; over the next two weeks, Austrian attacks were repulsed with heavy losses. As a result, Austria had to keep sizeable forces on the Serbian front, weakening their efforts against Russia. Serbia's victory against Austria-Hungary in the 1914 invasion has been called one of the major upset victories of the twentieth century. In 1915, the campaign saw the first use of anti-aircraft warfare after an Austrian plane was shot down with ground-to-air fire, as well as the first medical evacuation by the Serbian army.

German offensive in Belgium and France

image
German soldiers on the way to the front in 1914; at this stage, all sides expected the conflict to be a short one.

Upon mobilisation, in accordance with the Schlieffen Plan, 80% of the German Army was located on the Western Front, with the remainder acting as a screening force in the East. Rather than a direct attack across their shared frontier, the German right wing would sweep through the Netherlands and Belgium, then swing south, encircling Paris and trapping the French army against the Swiss border. The plan's creator, Alfred von Schlieffen, head of the German General Staff from 1891 to 1906, estimated that this would take six weeks, after which the German army would transfer to the East and defeat the Russians.

The plan was substantially modified by his successor, Helmuth von Moltke the Younger. Under Schlieffen, 85% of German forces in the west were assigned to the right wing, with the remainder holding along the frontier. By keeping his left-wing deliberately weak, he hoped to lure the French into an offensive into the "lost provinces" of Alsace-Lorraine, which was the strategy envisaged by their Plan XVII. However, Moltke grew concerned that the French might push too hard on his left flank and as the German Army increased in size from 1908 to 1914, he changed the allocation of forces between the two wings to 70:30. He also considered Dutch neutrality essential for German trade and cancelled the incursion into the Netherlands, which meant any delays in Belgium threatened the viability of the plan. Historian Richard Holmes argues that these changes meant the right wing was not strong enough to achieve decisive success.

image
French bayonet charge during the Battle of the Frontiers; by the end of August, French casualties exceeded 260,000, including 75,000 dead.

The initial German advance in the West was very successful. By the end of August, the Allied left, which included the British Expeditionary Force (BEF), was in full retreat, and the French offensive in Alsace-Lorraine was a disastrous failure, with casualties exceeding 260,000. German planning provided broad strategic instructions while allowing army commanders considerable freedom in carrying them out at the front, but von Kluck used this freedom to disobey orders, opening a gap between the German armies as they closed on Paris. The French army, reinforced by the British expeditionary corps, seized this opportunity to counter-attack and pushed the German army 40 to 80 km back. Both armies were then so exhausted that no decisive move could be implemented, so they settled in trenches, with the vain hope of breaking through as soon as they could build local superiority.

In 1911, the Russian Stavka agreed with the French to attack Germany within fifteen days of mobilisation, ten days before the Germans had anticipated, although it meant the two Russian armies that entered East Prussia on 17 August did so without many of their support elements.

By the end of 1914, German troops held strong defensive positions inside France, controlled the bulk of France's domestic coalfields, and inflicted 230,000 more casualties than it lost itself. However, communications problems and questionable command decisions cost Germany the chance of a decisive outcome, while it had failed to achieve the primary objective of avoiding a long, two-front war. As was apparent to several German leaders, this amounted to a strategic defeat; shortly after the First Battle of the Marne, Crown Prince Wilhelm told an American reporter "We have lost the war. It will go on for a long time but lost it is already."

Asia and the Pacific

image
Japanese soldiers occupy a captured German trench during the Siege of Tsingtao, 1914

On 30 August 1914, New Zealand occupied German Samoa (now Samoa). On 11 September, the Australian Naval and Military Expeditionary Force landed on the island of New Britain, then part of German New Guinea. On 28 October, the German cruiser SMS Emden sank the Russian cruiser Zhemchug in the Battle of Penang. Japan declared war on Germany before seizing territories in the Pacific, which later became the South Seas Mandate, as well as German Treaty ports on the Chinese Shandong peninsula at Tsingtao. After Vienna refused to withdraw its cruiser SMS Kaiserin Elisabeth from Tsingtao, Japan declared war on Austria-Hungary, and the ship was sunk in November 1914. Within a few months, Allied forces had seized all German territories in the Pacific, leaving only isolated commerce raiders and a few holdouts in New Guinea.

African campaigns

image
British artillery in Kamerun, 1915.

Some of the first clashes of the war involved British, French, and German colonial forces in Africa. On 6–7 August, French and British troops invaded the German protectorates of Togoland and Kamerun. On 10 August, German forces in South-West Africa attacked South Africa; sporadic and fierce fighting continued for the rest of the war. The German colonial forces in German East Africa, led by Colonel Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck, fought a guerrilla warfare campaign and only surrendered two weeks after the armistice took effect in Europe.

Indian support for the Allies

image
British Indian Army infantry divisions in France; these troops were withdrawn in December 1915, and served in the Mesopotamian campaign.

Before the war, Germany had attempted to use Indian nationalism and pan-Islamism to its advantage, a policy continued post-1914 by instigating uprisings in India, while the Niedermayer–Hentig Expedition urged Afghanistan to join the war on the side of Central Powers. However, contrary to British fears of a revolt in India, the outbreak of the war saw a reduction in nationalist activity. Leaders from the Indian National Congress and other groups believed support for the British war effort would hasten Indian Home Rule, a promise allegedly made explicit in 1917 by Edwin Montagu, the Secretary of State for India.

In 1914, the British Indian Army was larger than the British Army itself, and between 1914 and 1918 an estimated 1.3 million Indian soldiers and labourers served in Europe, Africa, and the Middle East. In all, 140,000 soldiers served on the Western Front and nearly 700,000 in the Middle East, with 47,746 killed and 65,126 wounded. The suffering engendered by the war, as well as the failure of the British government to grant self-government to India afterward, bred disillusionment, resulting in the campaign for full independence led by Mahatma Gandhi.

Western Front

Trench warfare begins

image
British Indian soldiers digging trenches in Laventie, France, 1915

Pre-war military tactics that had emphasised open warfare and individual riflemen proved obsolete when confronted with conditions prevailing in 1914. Technological advances allowed the creation of strong defensive systems largely impervious to massed infantry advances, such as barbed wire, machine guns and above all far more powerful artillery, which dominated the battlefield and made crossing open ground extremely difficult. Both sides struggled to develop tactics for breaching entrenched positions without heavy casualties. In time, technology enabled the production of new offensive weapons, such as gas warfare and the tank.

After the First Battle of the Marne in September 1914, Allied and German forces unsuccessfully tried to outflank each other, a series of manoeuvres later known as the "Race to the Sea". By the end of 1914, the opposing forces confronted each other along an uninterrupted line of entrenched positions from the Channel to the Swiss border. Since the Germans were normally able to choose where to stand, they generally held the high ground, while their trenches tended to be better built; those constructed by the French and English were initially considered "temporary", only needed until an offensive would destroy the German defences. Both sides tried to break the stalemate using scientific and technological advances. On 22 April 1915, at the Second Battle of Ypres, the Germans (violating the Hague Convention) used chlorine gas for the first time on the Western Front. Several types of gas soon became widely used by both sides and though it never proved a decisive, battle-winning weapon, it became one of the most feared and best-remembered horrors of the war.

Continuation of trench warfare

image
German casualties at the Somme, 1916

In February 1916, the Germans attacked French defensive positions at the Battle of Verdun, lasting until December 1916. Casualties were greater for the French, but the Germans bled heavily as well, with anywhere from 700,000 to 975,000 casualties between the two combatants. Verdun became a symbol of French determination and self-sacrifice.

The Battle of the Somme was an Anglo-French offensive from July to November 1916. The opening day on 1 July 1916, was the bloodiest single day in the history of the British Army, which suffered 57,500 casualties, including 19,200 dead. As a whole, the Somme offensive led to an estimated 420,000 British casualties, along with 200,000 French and 500,000 Germans. The diseases that emerged in the trenches were a major killer on both sides. The living conditions led to disease and infection, such as trench foot, lice, typhus, trench fever, and the 'Spanish flu'.

image
Battleships of the Hochseeflotte, 1917

At the start of the war, German cruisers were scattered across the globe, some of which were subsequently used to attack Allied merchant shipping. These were systematically hunted down by the Royal Navy, though not before causing considerable damage. One of the most successful was the SMS Emden, part of the German East Asia Squadron stationed at Qingdao, which seized or sank 15 merchantmen, a Russian cruiser and a French destroyer. Most of the squadron was returning to Germany when it sank two British armoured cruisers at the Battle of Coronel in November 1914, before being virtually destroyed at the Battle of the Falkland Islands in December. The SMS Dresden escaped with a few auxiliaries, but after the Battle of Más a Tierra, these too were either destroyed or interned.

Soon after the outbreak of hostilities, Britain began a naval blockade of Germany. This proved effective in cutting off vital supplies, though it violated accepted international law. Britain also mined international waters which closed off entire sections of the ocean, even to neutral ships. Since there was limited response to this tactic, Germany expected a similar response to its unrestricted submarine warfare.

The Battle of Jutland in May/June 1916 was the only full-scale clash of battleships during the war, and one of the largest in history. The clash was indecisive, though the Germans inflicted more damage than they received; thereafter the bulk of the German High Seas Fleet was confined to port.

image
U-155 exhibited near Tower Bridge in London, after the 1918 Armistice

German U-boats attempted to cut the supply lines between North America and Britain. The nature of submarine warfare meant that attacks often came without warning, giving the crews of the merchant ships little hope of survival. The United States launched a protest, and Germany changed its rules of engagement. After the sinking of the passenger ship RMS Lusitania in 1915, Germany promised not to target passenger liners, while Britain armed its merchant ships, placing them beyond the protection of the "cruiser rules", which demanded warning and movement of crews to "a place of safety" (a standard that lifeboats did not meet). Finally, in early 1917, Germany adopted a policy of unrestricted submarine warfare, realising the Americans would eventually enter the war. Germany sought to strangle Allied sea lanes before the United States could transport a large army overseas, but, after initial successes, eventually failed to do so.

The U-boat threat lessened in 1917, when merchant ships began travelling in convoys, escorted by destroyers. This tactic made it difficult for U-boats to find targets, which significantly lessened losses; after the hydrophone and depth charges were introduced, destroyers could potentially successfully attack a submerged submarine. Convoys slowed the flow of supplies since ships had to wait as convoys were assembled; the solution was an extensive program of building new freighters. Troopships were too fast for the submarines and did not travel the North Atlantic in convoys. The U-boats sunk more than 5,000 Allied ships, at the cost of 199 submarines.

World War I also saw the first use of aircraft carriers in combat, with HMS Furious launching Sopwith Camels in a successful raid against the Zeppelin hangars at Tondern in July 1918, as well as blimps for antisubmarine patrol.

Southern theatres

War in the Balkans

image
Refugee transport from Serbia in Leibnitz, Styria, 1914

Faced with Russia in the east, Austria-Hungary could spare only one-third of its army to attack Serbia. After suffering heavy losses, the Austrians briefly occupied the Serbian capital, Belgrade. A Serbian counter-attack in the Battle of Kolubara succeeded in driving them from the country by the end of 1914. For the first 10 months of 1915, Austria-Hungary used most of its military reserves to fight Italy. German and Austro-Hungarian diplomats scored a coup by persuading Bulgaria to join the attack on Serbia. The Austro-Hungarian provinces of Slovenia, Croatia and Bosnia provided troops for Austria-Hungary. Montenegro allied itself with Serbia.

image
Bulgarian soldiers in a trench, preparing to fire against an incoming aeroplane

Bulgaria declared war on Serbia on 14 October 1915, and joined in the attack by the Austro-Hungarian army under Mackensen's army of 250,000 that was already underway. Serbia was conquered in a little more than a month, as the Central Powers, now including Bulgaria, sent in 600,000 troops in total. The Serbian army, fighting on two fronts and facing certain defeat, retreated into northern Albania. The Serbs suffered defeat in the Battle of Kosovo. Montenegro covered the Serbian retreat toward the Adriatic coast in the Battle of Mojkovac on 6–7 January 1916, but ultimately the Austrians also conquered Montenegro. The surviving Serbian soldiers were evacuated to Greece. After the conquest, Serbia was divided between Austro-Hungary and Bulgaria.

In late 1915, a Franco-British force landed at Salonica in Greece to offer assistance and to pressure its government to declare war against the Central Powers. However, the pro-German King Constantine I dismissed the pro-Allied government of Eleftherios Venizelos before the Allied expeditionary force arrived.

The Macedonian front was at first mostly static. French and Serbian forces retook limited areas of Macedonia by recapturing Bitola on 19 November 1916, following the costly Monastir offensive, which brought stabilisation of the front.

image
Austro-Hungarian troops executing captured Serbians, 1917. Serbia lost about 850,000 people during the war, a quarter of its pre-war population.

Serbian and French troops finally made a breakthrough in September 1918 in the Vardar offensive, after most German and Austro-Hungarian troops had been withdrawn. The Bulgarians were defeated at the Battle of Dobro Pole, and by 25 September British and French troops had crossed the border into Bulgaria proper as the Bulgarian army collapsed. Bulgaria capitulated four days later, on 29 September 1918. The German high command responded by despatching troops to hold the line, but these forces were too weak to re-establish a front.

The disappearance of the Macedonian front meant that the road to Budapest and Vienna was now opened to Allied forces. Hindenburg and Ludendorff concluded that the strategic and operational balance had now shifted decidedly against the Central Powers and, a day after the Bulgarian collapse, insisted on an immediate peace settlement.

Ottoman Empire

image
Australian troops charging near a Turkish trench during the Gallipoli campaign

The Ottomans threatened Russia's Caucasian territories and Britain's communications with India via the Suez Canal. The Ottoman Empire took advantage of the European powers' preoccupation with the war and conducted large-scale ethnic cleansing of the Armenian, Greek, and Assyrian Christian populations—the Armenian genocide, Greek genocide, and Assyrian genocide respectively.

The British and French opened overseas fronts with the Gallipoli (1915) and Mesopotamian campaigns (1914). In Gallipoli, the Ottoman Empire successfully repelled the British, French, and Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (ANZACs). In Mesopotamia, by contrast, after the defeat of the British defenders in the siege of Kut by the Ottomans (1915–1916), British Imperial forces reorganised and captured Baghdad in March 1917. The British were aided in Mesopotamia by local Arab and Assyrian fighters, while the Ottomans employed local Kurdish and Turcoman tribes.

The Suez Canal was defended from Ottoman attacks in 1915 and 1916; in August 1916, a German and Ottoman force was defeated at the Battle of Romani by the ANZAC Mounted Division and the 52nd (Lowland) Infantry Division. Following this victory, an Egyptian Expeditionary Force advanced across the Sinai Peninsula, pushing Ottoman forces back in the Battle of Magdhaba in December and the Battle of Rafa on the border between the Egyptian Sinai and Ottoman Palestine in January 1917.

image
Russian forest trench at the Battle of Sarikamish, 1914–1915

Russian armies generally had success in the Caucasus campaign. Enver Pasha, supreme commander of the Ottoman armed forces, dreamed of re-conquering central Asia and areas that had been previously lost to Russia. He was, however, a poor commander. He launched an offensive against the Russians in the Caucasus in December 1914 with 100,000 troops, insisting on a frontal attack against mountainous Russian positions in winter. He lost 86% of his force at the Battle of Sarikamish. General Yudenich, the Russian commander from 1915 to 1916, drove the Turks out of most of the southern Caucasus.

image
Kaiser Wilhelm II and Prince Leopold of Bavaria inspecting Turkish troops of the 15th Corps in East Galicia, Austria-Hungary (now Poland).

The Ottoman Empire, with German support, invaded Persia (modern Iran) in December 1914 to cut off British and Russian access to petroleum reservoirs around Baku. Persia, ostensibly neutral, had long been under British and Russian influence. The Ottomans and Germans were aided by Kurdish and Azeri forces, together with a large number of major Iranian tribes, while the Russians and British had the support of Armenian and Assyrian forces. The Persian campaign lasted until 1918 and ended in failure for the Ottomans and their allies. However, the Russian withdrawal from the war in 1917 led Armenian and Assyrian forces to be cut off from supply lines, outnumbered, outgunned and isolated, forcing them to fight and flee towards British lines in northern Mesopotamia.

The Arab Revolt, instigated by the British Foreign Office, started in June 1916 with the Battle of Mecca, led by Sharif Hussein. The Sharif declared the independence of the Kingdom of Hejaz and, with British assistance, conquered much of Ottoman-held Arabia, resulting finally in the Ottoman surrender of Damascus. Fakhri Pasha, the Ottoman commander of Medina, resisted for more than 2+12 years during the siege of Medina before surrendering in January 1919.

The Senussi tribe, along the border of Italian Libya and British Egypt, incited and armed by the Turks, waged a small-scale guerrilla war against Allied troops. The British were forced to dispatch 12,000 troops to oppose them in the Senussi campaign. Their rebellion was finally crushed in mid-1916.

Total Allied casualties on the Ottoman fronts amounted to 650,000 men. Total Ottoman casualties were 725,000, with 325,000 dead and 400,000 wounded.

Italian Front

image
Isonzo Offensives 1915–1917

Though Italy joined the Triple Alliance in 1882, a treaty with its traditional Austrian enemy was so controversial that subsequent governments denied its existence and the terms were only made public in 1915. This arose from nationalist designs on Austro-Hungarian territory in Trentino, the Austrian Littoral, Rijeka and Dalmatia, considered vital to secure the borders established in 1866. In 1902, Rome secretly had agreed with France to remain neutral if the latter was attacked by Germany, effectively nullifying its role in the Triple Alliance.

When the war began in 1914, Italy argued the Triple Alliance was defensive and it was not obliged to support an Austrian attack on Serbia. Opposition to joining the Central Powers increased when Turkey became a member in September, since in 1911 Italy had occupied Ottoman possessions in Libya and the Dodecanese islands. To secure Italian neutrality, the Central Powers offered them Tunisia, while in return for an immediate entry into the war, the Allies agreed to their demands for Austrian territory and sovereignty over the Dodecanese. Although they remained secret, these provisions were incorporated into the April 1915 Treaty of London; Italy joined the Triple Entente and, on 23 May, declared war on Austria-Hungary, followed by Germany fifteen months later.

image
Austro-Hungarian trench at 3,850 metres in the Ortler Alps, one of the most challenging fronts of the war

The pre-1914 Italian army was short of officers, trained men, adequate transport and modern weapons; by April 1915, some of these deficiencies had been remedied but it was still unprepared for the major offensive required by the Treaty of London. The advantage of superior numbers was offset by the difficult terrain; much of the fighting took place high in the Alps and Dolomites, where trench lines had to be cut through rock and ice and keeping troops supplied was a major challenge. These issues were exacerbated by unimaginative strategies and tactics. Between 1915 and 1917, the Italian commander, Luigi Cadorna, undertook a series of frontal assaults along the Isonzo, which made little progress and cost many lives; by the end of the war, Italian combat deaths totalled around 548,000.

In the spring of 1916, the Austro-Hungarians counterattacked in Asiago in the Strafexpedition, but made little progress and were pushed by the Italians back to Tyrol. Although Italy occupied southern Albania in May 1916, their main focus was the Isonzo front which, after the capture of Gorizia in August 1916, remained static until October 1917. After a combined Austro-German force won a major victory at Caporetto, Cadorna was replaced by Armando Diaz who retreated more than 100 kilometres (62 mi) before holding positions along the Piave River. A second Austrian offensive was repulsed in June 1918. On 24 October, Diaz launched the Battle of Vittorio Veneto and initially met stubborn resistance, but with Austria-Hungary collapsing, Hungarian divisions in Italy demanded they be sent home. When this was granted, many others followed and the Imperial army disintegrated, the Italians taking over 300,000 prisoners. On 3 November, the Armistice of Villa Giusti ended hostilities between Austria-Hungary and Italy which occupied Trieste and areas along the Adriatic Sea awarded to it in 1915.

Eastern Front

Initial actions

image
Tsar Nicholas II and Grand Duke Nikolaevich following the Russian capture of Przemyśl, the longest siege of the war.

As previously agreed with French president Raymond Poincaré, Russian plans at the start of the war were to simultaneously advance into Austrian Galicia and East Prussia as soon as possible. Although their attack on Galicia was largely successful, and the invasions achieved their aim of forcing Germany to divert troops from the Western Front, the speed of mobilisation meant they did so without much of their heavy equipment and support functions. These weaknesses contributed to Russian defeats at Tannenberg and the Masurian Lakes in August and September 1914, forcing them to withdraw from East Prussia with heavy losses. By spring 1915, they had also retreated from Galicia, and the May 1915 Gorlice–Tarnów offensive allowed the Central Powers to invade Russian-occupied Poland.

Despite the successful June 1916 Brusilov offensive against the Austrians in eastern Galicia, shortages of supplies, heavy losses and command failures prevented the Russians from fully exploiting their victory. However, it was one of the most significant offensives of the war, diverting German resources from Verdun, relieving Austro-Hungarian pressure on the Italians, and convincing Romania to enter the war on the side of the Allies on 27 August. It also fatally weakened both the Austrian and Russian armies, whose offensive capabilities were badly affected by their losses and increased disillusion with the war that ultimately led to the Russian revolutions.

Meanwhile, unrest grew in Russia as Tsar Nicholas II remained at the front, with the home front controlled by Empress Alexandra. Her increasingly incompetent rule and food shortages in urban areas led to widespread protests and the murder of her favourite, Grigori Rasputin, at the end of 1916.

Romanian participation

image
image
Bucharest
image
Timișoara (Banat)
image
Cluj (Transylvania)
image
Chișinău (Moldova)
image
Constanța (Dobruja)
image
Bulgaria
image
Hungary
image
Mărășești
image
Oituz
class=notpageimage|
Romania key locations 1916–1918 (using 2025 borders)

Despite secretly agreeing to support the Triple Alliance in 1883, Romania increasingly found itself at odds with the Central Powers over their support for Bulgaria in the Balkan Wars and the status of ethnic Romanian communities in Hungarian-controlled Transylvania, which comprised an estimated 2.8 million of the 5.0 million population. With the ruling elite split into pro-German and pro-Entente factions, Romania remained neutral for two years while allowing Germany and Austria to transport military supplies and advisors across Romanian territory.

In September 1914, Russia acknowledged Romanian rights to Austro-Hungarian territories including Transylvania and Banat, whose acquisition had widespread popular support, and Russian success against Austria led Romania to join the Entente in the August 1916 Treaty of Bucharest. Under the strategic plan known as Hypothesis Z, the Romanian army planned an offensive into Transylvania, while defending Southern Dobruja and Giurgiu against a possible Bulgarian counterattack. On 27 August 1916, they attacked Transylvania and occupied substantial parts of the province before being driven back by the recently formed German 9th Army, led by former Chief of Staff Erich von Falkenhayn. A combined German-Bulgarian-Turkish offensive captured Dobruja and Giurgiu, although the bulk of the Romanian army managed to escape encirclement and retreated to Bucharest, which surrendered to the Central Powers on 6 December 1916.

In the summer of 1917, a Central Powers offensive began in Romania under the command of August von Mackensen to knock Romania out of the war, resulting in the battles of Oituz, Mărăști and Mărășești where up to 1,000,000 Central Powers troops were present. The battles lasted from 22 July to 3 September and eventually, the Romanian army was victorious advancing 500 km2. August von Mackensen could not plan for another offensive as he had to transfer troops to the Italian Front. Following the Russian revolution, Romania found itself alone on the Eastern Front and signed the Treaty of Bucharest with the Central Powers, which recognised Romanian sovereignty over Bessarabia in return for ceding control of passes in the Carpathian Mountains to Austria-Hungary and leasing its oil wells to Germany. Although approved by Parliament, King Ferdinand I refused to sign it, hoping for an Allied victory in the west. Romania re-entered the war on 10 November 1918, on the side of the Allies and the Treaty of Bucharest was formally annulled by the Armistice of 11 November 1918.

Central Powers peace overtures

On 12 December 1916, after ten brutal months of the Battle of Verdun and a successful offensive against Romania, Germany attempted to negotiate a peace with the Allies. However, this attempt was rejected out of hand as a "duplicitous war ruse".

image
"They shall not pass", a phrase typically associated with the defence of Verdun

US president Woodrow Wilson attempted to intervene as a peacemaker, asking for both sides to state their demands. Lloyd George's War Cabinet considered the German offer to be a ploy to create divisions among the Allies. After initial outrage and much deliberation, they took Wilson's note as a separate effort, signalling that the US was on the verge of entering the war against Germany following the "submarine outrages". While the Allies debated a response to Wilson's offer, the Germans chose to rebuff it in favour of "a direct exchange of views". Learning of the German response, the Allied governments were free to make clear demands in their response of 14 January. They sought restoration of damages, the evacuation of occupied territories, reparations for France, Russia and Romania, and a recognition of the principle of nationalities. The Allies sought guarantees that would prevent or limit future wars. The negotiations failed and the Entente powers rejected the German offer on the grounds of honour, and noted Germany had not put forward any specific proposals.

Final years of the war

Russian Revolution and withdrawal

image
Territory lost by Russia under the 1918 Treaty of Brest-Litovsk

By the end of 1916, Russian casualties totalled nearly five million killed, wounded or captured, with major urban areas affected by food shortages and high prices. In March 1917, Tsar Nicholas ordered the military to forcibly suppress strikes in Petrograd but the troops refused to fire on the crowds. Revolutionaries set up the Petrograd Soviet and fearing a left-wing takeover, the State Duma forced Nicholas to abdicate and established the Russian Provisional Government, which confirmed Russia's willingness to continue the war. However, the Petrograd Soviet refused to disband, creating competing power centres and causing confusion and chaos, with frontline soldiers becoming increasingly demoralised.

Following the tsar's abdication, Vladimir Lenin—with the help of the German government—was ushered from Switzerland into Russia on 16 April 1917. Discontent and the weaknesses of the Provisional Government led to a rise in the popularity of the Bolshevik Party, led by Lenin, which demanded an immediate end to the war. The Revolution of November was followed in December by an armistice and negotiations with Germany. At first, the Bolsheviks refused the German terms, but when German troops began marching across Ukraine unopposed, they acceded to the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk on 3 March 1918. The treaty ceded vast territories, including Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and parts of Poland and Ukraine to the Central Powers.

With the Russian Empire out of the war, Romania found itself alone on the Eastern Front and signed the Treaty of Bucharest with the Central Powers in May 1918. Under the terms of the treaty, Romania ceded territory to Austria-Hungary and Bulgaria and leased its oil reserves to Germany. However, the terms also included the Central Powers' recognition of the union of Bessarabia with Romania.

United States enters the war

image
President Wilson asking Congress to declare war on Germany, 2 April 1917

The United States was a major supplier of war material to the Allies but remained neutral in 1914, in large part due to domestic opposition. The most significant factor in creating the support Wilson needed was the German submarine offensive, which not only cost American lives but paralysed trade as ships were reluctant to put to sea.

On 6 April 1917, Congress declared war on Germany as an "Associated Power" of the Allies. The US Navy sent a battleship group to Scapa Flow to join the Grand Fleet, and provided convoy escorts. In April 1917, the US Army had fewer than 300,000 men, including National Guard units, compared to British and French armies of 4.1 and 8.3 million respectively. The Selective Service Act of 1917 drafted 2.8 million men, though training and equipping such numbers was a huge logistical challenge. By June 1918, over 667,000 members of the American Expeditionary Forces (AEF) were transported to France, a figure which reached 2 million by the end of November.

Despite his conviction that Germany must be defeated, Wilson went to war to ensure the US played a leading role in shaping the peace, which meant preserving the AEF as a separate military force, rather than being absorbed into British or French units as his Allies wanted. He was strongly supported by AEF commander General John J. Pershing, a proponent of pre-1914 "open warfare" who considered the French and British emphasis on artillery misguided and incompatible with American "offensive spirit". Much to the frustration of his Allies, who had suffered heavy losses in 1917, he insisted on retaining control of American troops, and refused to commit them to the front line until able to operate as independent units. As a result, the first significant US involvement was the Meuse–Argonne offensive in late September 1918.

Nivelle Offensive (April–May 1917)

image
Canadian Corps troops at the Battle of Vimy Ridge, 1917

In December 1916, Robert Nivelle replaced Pétain as commander of French armies on the Western Front and began planning a spring attack in Champagne, part of a joint Franco-British operation. Poor security meant German intelligence was well informed on tactics and timetables, but despite this, when the attack began on 16 April the French made substantial gains, before being brought to a halt by the newly built and extremely strong defences of the Hindenburg Line. Nivelle persisted with frontal assaults and, by 25 April, the French had suffered nearly 135,000 casualties, including 30,000 dead, most incurred in the first two days.

Concurrent British attacks at Arras were more successful, though ultimately of little strategic value. Operating as a separate unit for the first time, the Canadian Corps' capture of Vimy Ridge is viewed by many Canadians as a defining moment in creating a sense of national identity. Though Nivelle continued the offensive, on 3 May the 21st Division, which had been involved in some of the heaviest fighting at Verdun, refused orders to go into battle, initiating the French Army mutinies; within days, "collective indiscipline" had spread to 54 divisions, while over 20,000 deserted.

Sinai and Palestine campaign (1917–1918)

image
British artillery battery on Mount Scopus in the Battle of Jerusalem, 1917.

In March and April 1917, at the First and Second Battles of Gaza, German and Ottoman forces stopped the advance of the Egyptian Expeditionary Force, which had begun in August 1916 at the Battle of Romani. At the end of October 1917, the Sinai and Palestine campaign resumed, when General Edmund Allenby's XXth Corps, XXI Corps and Desert Mounted Corps won the Battle of Beersheba. Two Ottoman armies were defeated a few weeks later at the Battle of Mughar Ridge and, early in December, Jerusalem had been captured following another Ottoman defeat at the Battle of Jerusalem. About this time, Friedrich Freiherr Kress von Kressenstein was relieved of his duties as the Eighth Army's commander, replaced by Djevad Pasha, and a few months later the commander of the Ottoman Army in Palestine, Erich von Falkenhayn, was replaced by Otto Liman von Sanders.

In early 1918, the front line was extended and the Jordan Valley was occupied, following the First Transjordan and the Second Transjordan attacks by British Empire forces in March and April 1918.

German offensive and Allied counter-offensive (March–November 1918)

image
Between April and November 1918, the Allies increased their front-line rifle strength while German strength fell by half.

In December 1917, the Central Powers signed an armistice with Russia, thus freeing large numbers of German troops for use in the West. With German reinforcements and new American troops pouring in, the outcome was to be decided on the Western Front. The Central Powers knew that they could not win a protracted war, but they held high hopes for success in a final quick offensive. Ludendorff drew up plans (Operation Michael) for the 1918 offensive on the Western Front. The operation commenced on 21 March 1918, with an attack on British forces near Saint-Quentin. German forces achieved an unprecedented advance of 60 kilometres (37 mi). The initial offensive was a success; after heavy fighting, however, the offensive was halted. Lacking tanks or motorised artillery, the Germans were unable to consolidate their gains. The problems of re-supply were also exacerbated by increasing distances that now stretched over terrain that was shell-torn and often impassable to traffic. Germany launched Operation Georgette against the northern English Channel ports. The Allies halted the drive after limited territorial gains by Germany. The German Army to the south then conducted Operations Blücher and Yorck, pushing broadly towards Paris. Germany launched Operation Marne (Second Battle of the Marne) on 15 July, in an attempt to encircle Reims. The resulting counter-attack, which started the Hundred Days Offensive on 8 August, led to a marked collapse in German morale.

Allied advance to the Hindenburg Line

image
American soldiers firing on German entrenched positions during the Meuse-Argonne offensive, 1918

By September, the Germans had fallen back to the Hindenburg Line. The Allies had advanced to the Hindenburg Line in the north and centre. German forces launched numerous counterattacks, but positions and outposts of the Line continued falling, with the BEF alone taking 30,441 prisoners in the last week of September. On 24 September, the Supreme Army Command informed the leaders in Berlin that armistice talks were inevitable.

The final assault on the Hindenburg Line began with the Meuse-Argonne offensive, launched by American and French troops on 26 September. Two days later the Belgians, French and British attacked around Ypres, and the day after the British at St Quentin in the centre of the line. The following week, cooperating American and French units broke through in Champagne at the Battle of Blanc Mont Ridge ( 3–27 October), forcing the Germans off the commanding heights, and closing towards the Belgian frontier. On 8 October, the Hindenburg Line was pierced by British and Dominion troops of the First and Third British Armies at the Second Battle of Cambrai.

Breakthrough of Macedonian front (September 1918)

image
Bulgarian major Ivanov with white flag surrendering to Serbian 7th Danube regiment near Kumanovo

Allied forces started the Vardar offensive on 15 September at two key points: Dobro Pole and near Dojran Lake. In the Battle of Dobro Pole, the Serbian and French armies had success after a three-day-long battle with relatively small casualties, and subsequently made a breakthrough in the front, something which was rarely seen in World War I. After the front was broken, Allied forces started to liberate Serbia and reached Skopje at 29 September, after which Bulgaria signed an armistice with the Allies on 30 September.

Armistices and capitulations

image
Italian troops reach Trento during the Battle of Vittorio Veneto, 1918

The collapse of the Central Powers came swiftly. Bulgaria was the first to sign an armistice, the Armistice of Salonica on 29 September 1918. Wilhelm II, in a telegram to Tsar Ferdinand I of Bulgaria described the situation thus: "Disgraceful! 62,000 Serbs decided the war!". On the same day, the German Supreme Army Command informed Wilhelm II and the Imperial Chancellor Count Georg von Hertling, that the military situation facing Germany was hopeless.

On 24 October, the Italians began a push that rapidly recovered territory lost after the Battle of Caporetto. This culminated in the Battle of Vittorio Veneto, marking the end of the Austro-Hungarian Army as an effective fighting force. The offensive also triggered the disintegration of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. During the last week of October, declarations of independence were made in Budapest, Prague, and Zagreb. On 29 October, the imperial authorities asked Italy for an armistice, but the Italians continued advancing, reaching Trento, Udine, and Trieste. On 3 November, Austria-Hungary sent a flag of truce and accepted the Armistice of Villa Giusti, arranged with the Allied Authorities in Paris. Austria and Hungary signed separate armistices following the overthrow of the Habsburg monarchy. In the following days, the Italian Army occupied Innsbruck and all Tyrol, with over 20,000 soldiers.

On 30 October, the Ottoman Empire capitulated, and signed the Armistice of Mudros.

German government surrenders

image
Ferdinand Foch (second from right) pictured outside the carriage in Compiègne after agreeing to the armistice that ended the war there.

With the military faltering and with widespread loss of confidence in the kaiser, Germany moved towards surrender. Prince Maximilian of Baden took charge on 3 October as Chancellor of Germany. Negotiations with President Wilson began immediately, in the hope that he would offer better terms than the British and French. Wilson demanded a constitutional monarchy and parliamentary control over the German military.

The German Revolution of 1918–1919 began at the end of October 1918. Units of the German Navy refused to set sail for a large-scale operation in a war they believed to be as good as lost. The sailors' revolt, which then ensued in the naval ports of Wilhelmshaven and Kiel, spread across the whole country within days and led to the proclamation of a republic on 9 November 1918, shortly thereafter to the abdication of Wilhelm II, and German surrender.

Aftermath

In the aftermath of the war, the German, Austro-Hungarian, Ottoman, and Russian empires disappeared. Numerous nations regained their former independence, and new ones were created. Four dynasties fell as a result of the war: the Romanovs, the Hohenzollerns, the Habsburgs, and the Ottomans. Belgium and Serbia were badly damaged, as was France, with 1.4 million soldiers dead, not counting other casualties. Germany and Russia were similarly affected.

Formal end of the war

image
The signing of the Treaty of Versailles in the Hall of Mirrors, Versailles, 28 June 1919, by Sir William Orpen

A formal state of war between the two sides persisted for another seven months, until the signing of the Treaty of Versailles with Germany on 28 June 1919. The US Senate did not ratify the treaty despite public support for it, and did not formally end its involvement in the war until the Knox–Porter Resolution was signed on 2 July 1921 by President Warren G. Harding. For the British Empire, the state of war ceased under the provisions of the Termination of the Present War (Definition) Act 1918 concerning:

  • Germany on 10 January 1920.
  • Austria on 16 July 1920.
  • Bulgaria on 9 August 1920.
  • Hungary on 26 July 1921.
  • Turkey on 6 August 1924.
image
Greek prime minister Eleftherios Venizelos signing the Treaty of Sèvres

Some war memorials date the end of the war as being when the Versailles Treaty was signed in 1919, which was when many of the troops serving abroad finally returned home; by contrast, most commemorations of the war's end concentrate on the armistice of 11 November 1918.

Peace treaties and national boundaries

image
Map of territorial changes in Europe after World War I (as of 1923)

The Paris Peace Conference imposed a series of peace treaties on the Central Powers officially ending the war. The 1919 Treaty of Versailles dealt with Germany and, building on Wilson's 14th point, established the League of Nations on 28 June 1919.

The Central Powers had to acknowledge responsibility for "all the loss and damage to which the Allied and Associated Governments and their nationals have been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by" their aggression. In the Treaty of Versailles, this statement was Article 231. This article became known as the "War Guilt Clause", as the majority of Germans felt humiliated and resentful. The Germans felt they had been unjustly dealt with by what they called the "diktat of Versailles". German historian Hagen Schulze said the Treaty placed Germany "under legal sanctions, deprived of military power, economically ruined, and politically humiliated." Belgian historian Laurence Van Ypersele emphasises the central role played by memory of the war and the Versailles Treaty in German politics in the 1920s and 1930s:

Active denial of war guilt in Germany and German resentment at both reparations and continued Allied occupation of the Rhineland made widespread revision of the meaning and memory of the war problematic. The legend of the "stab in the back" and the wish to revise the "Versailles diktat", and the belief in an international threat aimed at the elimination of the German nation persisted at the heart of German politics. Even a man of peace such as [Gustav] Stresemann publicly rejected German guilt. As for the Nazis, they waved the banners of domestic treason and international conspiracy in an attempt to galvanise the German nation into a spirit of revenge. Like a Fascist Italy, Nazi Germany sought to redirect the memory of the war to the benefit of its policies.

Meanwhile, new nations liberated from German rule viewed the treaty as a recognition of wrongs committed against small nations by much larger aggressive neighbours.

image
Dissolution of Austria-Hungary after war

Austria-Hungary was partitioned into several successor states, largely but not entirely along ethnic lines. Apart from Austria and Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Italy, Poland, Romania and Yugoslavia received territories from the Dual Monarchy (the formerly separate and autonomous Kingdom of Croatia-Slavonia was incorporated into Yugoslavia). The details were contained in the treaties of Saint-Germain-en-Laye and Trianon. As a result, Hungary lost 64% of its total population, decreasing from 20.9 million to 7.6 million, and losing 31% (3.3 out of 10.7 million) of its ethnic Hungarians. According to the 1910 census, speakers of the Hungarian language included approximately 54% of the entire population of the Kingdom of Hungary. Within the country, numerous ethnic minorities were present: 16.1% Romanians, 10.5% Slovaks, 10.4% Germans, 2.5% Ruthenians, 2.5% Serbs and 8% others. Between 1920 and 1924, 354,000 Hungarians fled former Hungarian territories attached to Romania, Czechoslovakia, and Yugoslavia.

The Russian Empire lost much of its western frontier as the newly independent nations of Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland were carved from it. Romania took control of Bessarabia in April 1918.

National identities

After 123 years, Poland re-emerged as an independent country. The Kingdom of Serbia and its dynasty, as a "minor Entente nation" and the country with the most casualties per capita, became the backbone of a new multinational state, the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, later renamed Yugoslavia. Czechoslovakia, combining the Kingdom of Bohemia with parts of the Kingdom of Hungary, became a new nation. Romania would unite all Romanian-speaking people under a single state, leading to Greater Romania.

In Australia and New Zealand, the Battle of Gallipoli became known as those nations' "Baptism of Fire". It was the first major war in which the newly established countries fought, and it was one of the first times that Australian troops fought as Australians, not just subjects of the British Crown, and independent national identities for these nations took hold. Anzac Day, named after the Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (ANZAC), commemorates this defining moment.

In the aftermath of World War I, Greece fought against Turkish nationalists led by Mustafa Kemal, a war that eventually resulted in a massive population exchange between the two countries under the Treaty of Lausanne. According to various sources, several hundred thousand Greeks died during this period, which was tied in with the Greek genocide.

Casualties

image
Men transporting a wounded Ottoman soldier at Sirkeci

The total number of military and civilian casualties in World War I was about 40 million: estimates range from around 15 to 22 million deaths and about 23 million wounded military personnel, ranking it among the deadliest conflicts in human history. The total number of deaths includes between 9 and 11 million military personnel, with an estimated civilian death toll of about 6 to 13 million.

Of the 60 million European military personnel who were mobilised from 1914 to 1918, an estimated 8 million were killed, 7 million were permanently disabled, and 15 million were seriously injured. Germany lost 15.1% of its active male population, Austria-Hungary lost 17.1%, and France lost 10.5%. France mobilised 7.8 million men, of which 1.4 million died and 3.2 million were injured. Approximately 15,000 deployed men sustained gruesome facial injuries, causing social stigma and marginalisation; they were called the gueules cassées (broken faces). In Germany, civilian deaths were 474,000 higher than in peacetime, due in large part to food shortages and malnutrition that had weakened disease resistance. These excess deaths are estimated as 271,000 in 1918, plus another 71,000 in the first half of 1919 when the blockade was still in effect. Starvation caused by famine killed approximately 100,000 people in Lebanon.

image
Emergency military hospital during the Spanish flu pandemic in Camp Funston, Kansas, 1918

Diseases flourished in the chaotic wartime conditions. In 1914 alone, louse-borne epidemic typhus killed 200,000 in Serbia. Starting in early 1918, a major influenza epidemic known as Spanish flu spread across the world, accelerated by the movement of large numbers of soldiers, often crammed together in camps and transport ships with poor sanitation. The Spanish flu killed at least 17 to 25 million people, including an estimated 2.64 million Europeans and as many as 675,000 Americans. Between 1915 and 1926, an epidemic of encephalitis lethargica affected nearly 5 million people worldwide.

Eight million equines mostly horses, donkeys and mules died, three-quarters of them from the extreme conditions they worked in.

War crimes

Chemical weapons in warfare

image
French soldiers making a gas and flame attack on German trenches in Flanders

The German army was the first to successfully deploy chemical weapons during the Second Battle of Ypres (April–May 1915), after German scientists under the direction of Fritz Haber at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute developed a method to weaponise chlorine. The use of chemical weapons had been sanctioned by the German High Command to force Allied soldiers out of their entrenched positions, complementing rather than supplanting more lethal conventional weapons. Chemical weapons were deployed by all major belligerents throughout the war, inflicting approximately 1.3 million casualties, of which about 90,000 were fatal. The use of chemical weapons in warfare was a direct violation of the 1899 Hague Declaration Concerning Asphyxiating Gases and the 1907 Hague Convention on Land Warfare, which prohibited their use.

Genocides by the Ottoman Empire

image
Armenians killed during the Armenian genocide. Image taken from Ambassador Morgenthau's Story, written by Henry Morgenthau Sr. and published in 1918.

The ethnic cleansing of the Ottoman Empire's Armenian population, including mass deportations and executions, during the final years of the Ottoman Empire is considered genocide. The Ottomans carried out organised and systematic massacres of the Armenian population at the beginning of the war and manipulated acts of Armenian resistance by portraying them as rebellions to justify further extermination. In early 1915, several Armenians volunteered to join the Russian forces and the Ottoman government used this as a pretext to issue the Tehcir Law (Law on Deportation), which authorised the deportation of Armenians from the Empire's eastern provinces to Syria between 1915 and 1918. The Armenians were intentionally marched to death and a number were attacked by Ottoman brigands. While the exact number of deaths is unknown, the International Association of Genocide Scholars estimates around 1.5 million. The government of Turkey continues to deny the genocide to the present day, arguing that those who died were victims of inter-ethnic fighting, famine, or disease during World War I; these claims are rejected by most historians.

Other ethnic groups were similarly attacked by the Ottoman Empire during this period, including Assyrians and Greeks, and some scholars consider those events to be part of the same policy of extermination. At least 250,000 Assyrian Christians, about half of the population, and 350,000–750,000 Anatolian and Pontic Greeks were killed between 1915 and 1922.

Prisoners of war

image
British prisoners guarded by Ottoman forces after the First Battle of Gaza in 1917

About 8 million soldiers surrendered and were held in POW camps during the war. All nations pledged to follow the Hague Conventions on fair treatment of prisoners of war, and the survival rate for POWs was generally much higher than that of combatants at the front.

Around 25–31% of Russian losses (as a proportion of those captured, wounded, or killed) were to prisoner status; for Austria-Hungary 32%; for Italy 26%; for France 12%; for Germany 9%; for Britain 7%. Prisoners from the Allied armies totalled about 1.4 million (not including Russia, which lost 2.5–3.5 million soldiers as prisoners). From the Central Powers, about 3.3 million soldiers became prisoners; most of them surrendered to Russians.

Soldiers' experiences

Allied personnel was around 42,928,000, while Central personnel was near 25,248,000. British soldiers of the war were initially volunteers but were increasingly conscripted. Surviving veterans returning home often found they could discuss their experiences only among themselves, so formed "veterans' associations" or "Legions".

Conscription

image
U.S. Army recruiting poster with Uncle Sam, 1917

Conscription was common in most European countries. However, it was controversial in English-speaking countries, It was especially unpopular among minority ethnicities—especially the Irish Catholics in Ireland, Australia, and the French Catholics in Canada.

In the US, conscription began in 1917 and was generally well-received, with a few pockets of opposition in isolated rural areas. The administration decided to rely primarily on conscription, rather than voluntary enlistment, to raise military manpower after only 73,000 volunteers enlisted out of the initial 1 million target in the first six weeks of war.

Military attachés and war correspondents

Military and civilian observers from every major power closely followed the course of the war. Many were able to report on events from a perspective somewhat akin to modern "embedded" positions within the opposing land and naval forces.

Economic effects

Macro- and micro-economic consequences devolved from the war. Families were altered by the departure of many men. With the death or absence of the primary wage earner, women were forced into the workforce in unprecedented numbers. At the same time, the industry needed to replace the lost labourers sent to war. This aided the struggle for voting rights for women.

image
Poster showing women workers, 1915

In all nations, the government's share of GDP increased, surpassing 50% in both Germany and France and nearly reaching that level in Britain. To pay for purchases in the US, Britain cashed in its extensive investments in American railroads and then began borrowing heavily from Wall Street. President Wilson was on the verge of cutting off the loans in late 1916 but allowed a great increase in US government lending to the Allies. After 1919, the US demanded repayment of these loans. The repayments were, in part, funded by German reparations that, in turn, were supported by American loans to Germany. This circular system collapsed in 1931 and some loans were never repaid. Britain still owed the United States $4.4 billion of World War I debt in 1934; the last installment was finally paid in 2015.

Britain turned to her colonies for help in obtaining essential war materials whose supply from traditional sources had become difficult. Geologists such as Albert Kitson were called on to find new resources of precious minerals in the African colonies. Kitson discovered important new deposits of manganese, used in munitions production, in the Gold Coast.

Article 231 of the Treaty of Versailles (the so-called "war guilt" clause) stated Germany accepted responsibility for "all the loss and damage to which the Allied and Associated Governments and their nationals have been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by the aggression of Germany and her allies." It was worded as such to lay a legal basis for reparations, and a similar clause was inserted in the treaties with Austria and Hungary. However, neither of them interpreted it as an admission of war guilt. In 1921, the total reparation sum was placed at 132 billion gold marks. However, "Allied experts knew that Germany could not pay" this sum. The total sum was divided into three categories, with the third being "deliberately designed to be chimerical" and its "primary function was to mislead public opinion ... into believing the 'total sum was being maintained.'" Thus, 50 billion gold marks (12.5 billion dollars) "represented the actual Allied assessment of German capacity to pay" and "therefore ... represented the total German reparations" figure that had to be paid.

This figure could be paid in cash or in-kind (coal, timber, chemical dyes, etc.). Some of the territory lost—via the Treaty of Versailles—was credited towards the reparation figure as were other acts such as helping to restore the Library of Louvain. By 1929, the Great Depression caused political chaos throughout the world. In 1932 the payment of reparations was suspended by the international community, by which point Germany had paid only the equivalent of 20.598 billion gold marks. With the rise of Adolf Hitler, all bonds and loans that had been issued and taken out during the 1920s and early 1930s were cancelled. David Andelman notes "Refusing to pay doesn't make an agreement null and void. The bonds, the agreement, still exist." Thus, following the Second World War, at the London Conference in 1953, Germany agreed to resume payment on the money borrowed. On 3 October 2010, Germany made the final payment on these bonds.

The Australian prime minister, Billy Hughes, wrote to the British prime minister, David Lloyd George, "You have assured us that you cannot get better terms. I much regret it, and hope even now that some way may be found of securing agreement for demanding reparation commensurate with the tremendous sacrifices made by the British Empire and her Allies." Australia received £5,571,720 in war reparations, but the direct cost of the war to Australia had been £376,993,052, and, by the mid-1930s, repatriation pensions, war gratuities, interest and sinking fund charges were £831,280,947.

Support and opposition for the war

Support

image
Poster urging women to join the British war effort, published by the Young Women's Christian Association, 1915

In the Balkans, Yugoslav nationalists such as the leader, Ante Trumbić, strongly supported the war, desiring the freedom of Yugoslavs from Austria-Hungary and other foreign powers and the creation of an independent Yugoslavia. The Yugoslav Committee, led by Trumbić, was formed in Paris on 30 April 1915, but shortly moved its office to London. In April 1918, the Rome Congress of Oppressed Nationalities met, including Czechoslovak, Italian, Polish, Transylvanian, and Yugoslav representatives who urged the Allies to support national self-determination for the peoples residing within Austria-Hungary.

In the Middle East, Arab nationalism soared in Ottoman territories in response to the rise of Turkish nationalism during the war, with Arab nationalist leaders advocating the creation of a pan-Arab state. In 1916, the Arab Revolt began in Ottoman-controlled territories of the Middle East to achieve independence.

In East Africa, Iyasu V of Ethiopia was supporting the Dervish state who were at war with the British in the Somaliland campaign. Von Syburg, the German envoy in Addis Ababa, said, "now the time has come for Ethiopia to regain the coast of the Red Sea driving the Italians home, to restore the Empire to its ancient size." The Ethiopian Empire was on the verge of entering World War I on the side of the Central Powers before Iyasu's overthrow at the Battle of Segale due to Allied pressure on the Ethiopian aristocracy.

image
Bermuda Volunteer Rifle Corps First Contingent in Bermuda, winter 1914–1915, before joining 1 Lincolnshire Regiment in France in June 1915. The dozen remaining after Guedecourt on 25 September 1916, merged with a Second Contingent. The two contingents suffered 75% casualties.

Several socialist parties initially supported the war when it began in August 1914. But European socialists split on national lines, with the concept of class conflict held by radical socialists such as Marxists and syndicalists being overborne by their patriotic support for the war. Once the war began, Austrian, British, French, German, and Russian socialists followed the rising nationalist current by supporting their countries' intervention in the war.

Italian nationalism was stirred by the outbreak of the war and was initially strongly supported by a variety of political factions. One of the most prominent and popular Italian nationalist supporters of the war was Gabriele D'Annunzio, who promoted Italian irredentism and helped sway the Italian public to support intervention in the war. The Italian Liberal Party, under the leadership of Paolo Boselli, promoted intervention in the war on the side of the Allies and used the Dante Alighieri Society to promote Italian nationalism. Italian socialists were divided on whether to support the war or oppose it; some were militant supporters of the war, including Benito Mussolini and Leonida Bissolati. However, the Italian Socialist Party decided to oppose the war after anti-militarist protestors were killed, resulting in a general strike called Red Week. The Italian Socialist Party purged itself of pro-war nationalist members, including Mussolini. Mussolini formed the pro-interventionist Il Popolo d'Italia and the Fasci Rivoluzionario d'Azione Internazionalista ("Revolutionary Fasci for International Action") in October 1914 that later developed into the Fasci Italiani di Combattimento in 1919, the origin of fascism. Mussolini's nationalism enabled him to raise funds from Ansaldo (an armaments firm) and other companies to create Il Popolo d'Italia to convince socialists and revolutionaries to support the war.

Patriotic funds

On both sides, there was large-scale fundraising for soldiers' welfare, their dependents and those injured. The Nail Men were a German example. Around the British Empire, there were many patriotic funds, including the Royal Patriotic Fund Corporation, Canadian Patriotic Fund, Queensland Patriotic Fund and, by 1919, there were 983 funds in New Zealand. At the start of the next world war the New Zealand funds were reformed, having been criticised as overlapping, wasteful and abused, but 11 were still functioning in 2002.

Opposition

Many countries jailed those who spoke out against the conflict. These included Eugene Debs in the US and Bertrand Russell in Britain. In the US, the Espionage Act of 1917 and Sedition Act of 1918 made it a federal crime to oppose military recruitment or make any statements deemed "disloyal". Publications at all critical of the government were removed from circulation by postal censors, and many served long prison sentences for statements of fact deemed unpatriotic.

image
Sackville Street (now O'Connell Street) after the 1916 Easter Rising in Dublin

Several nationalists opposed intervention, particularly within states that the nationalists were hostile to. Although the vast majority of Irish people consented to participate in the war in 1914 and 1915, a minority of advanced Irish nationalists had staunchly opposed taking part. The war began amid the Home Rule crisis in Ireland that had resurfaced in 1912, and by July 1914 there was a serious possibility of an outbreak of civil war in Ireland. Irish nationalists and Marxists attempted to pursue Irish independence, culminating in the Easter Rising of 1916, with Germany sending 20,000 rifles to Ireland to stir unrest in Britain. The British government placed Ireland under martial law in response to the Easter Rising, though once the immediate threat of revolution had dissipated, the authorities did try to make concessions to nationalist feeling. However, opposition to involvement in the war increased in Ireland, resulting in the Conscription Crisis of 1918.

Other opposition came from conscientious objectors—some socialist, some religious—who had refused to fight. In Britain, 16,000 people asked for conscientious objector status. Some of them, most notably prominent peace activist Stephen Hobhouse, refused both military and alternative service. Many suffered years of prison, including solitary confinement. Even after the war, in Britain, many job advertisements were marked "No conscientious objectors need to apply".

On 1–4 May 1917, about 100,000 workers and soldiers of Petrograd, and after them, the workers and soldiers of other Russian cities, led by the Bolsheviks, demonstrated under banners reading "Down with the war!" and "all power to the Soviets!". The mass demonstrations resulted in a crisis for the Russian Provisional Government. In Milan, in May 1917, Bolshevik revolutionaries organised and engaged in rioting calling for an end to the war, and managed to close down factories and stop public transportation. The Italian army was forced to enter Milan with tanks and machine guns to face Bolsheviks and anarchists, who fought violently until 23 May when the army gained control of the city. Almost 50 people (including three Italian soldiers) were killed and over 800 people were arrested.

Technology

image
Royal Air Force Sopwith Camel. In April 1917, the average life expectancy of a British pilot on the Western Front was 93 flying hours.

World War I began as a clash of 20th-century technology and 19th-century tactics, with the inevitably large ensuing casualties. By the end of 1917, however, the major armies had modernised and were making use of telephone, wireless communication,armoured cars, tanks (especially with the advent of the prototype tank, Little Willie), and aircraft.

image
Captain Marcel Courmes, pilot of the French 2nd Bombardment, Group GB 2, in August 1915

Artillery also underwent a revolution. In 1914, cannons were positioned in the front line and fired directly at their targets. By 1917, indirect fire with guns (as well as mortars and even machine guns) was commonplace, using new techniques for spotting and ranging, notably, aircraft and the field telephone.

Fixed-wing aircraft were initially used for reconnaissance and ground attack. To shoot down enemy planes, anti-aircraft guns and fighter aircraft were developed. Strategic bombers were created, principally by the Germans and British, though the former used Zeppelins as well. Towards the end of the conflict, aircraft carriers were used for the first time, with HMS Furious launching Sopwith Camels in a raid to destroy the Zeppelin hangars at Tønder in 1918.

Diplomacy

image
1917 political cartoon about the Zimmermann Telegram

The non-military diplomatic and propaganda interactions among the nations were designed to build support for the cause or to undermine support for the enemy. For the most part, wartime diplomacy focused on five issues: propaganda campaigns; defining and redefining the war goals, which became harsher as the war went on; luring neutral nations (Italy, Ottoman Empire, Bulgaria, Romania) into the coalition by offering slices of enemy territory; and encouragement by the Allies of nationalistic minority movements inside the Central Powers, especially among Czechs, Poles, and Arabs. In addition, multiple peace proposals were coming from neutrals, or one side or the other; none of them progressed very far.[329]

Legacy and memory

Memorials

image
The Italian Redipuglia War Memorial, which contains the remains of 100,187 soldiers

Memorials were built in thousands of villages and towns. Close to battlefields, those buried in improvised burial grounds were gradually moved to formal graveyards under the care of organisations such as the Commonwealth War Graves Commission, the American Battle Monuments Commission, the German War Graves Commission, and Le Souvenir français. Many of these graveyards also have monuments to the missing or unidentified dead, such as the Menin Gate Memorial to the Missing and the Thiepval Memorial to the Missing of the Somme.

In 1915, John McCrae, a Canadian army doctor, wrote the poem In Flanders Fields as a salute to those who perished in the war. It is still recited today, especially on Remembrance Day and Memorial Day.

image
A typical village war memorial to soldiers killed in World War I

National World War I Museum and Memorial in Kansas City, Missouri, is a memorial dedicated to all Americans who served in World War I. The Liberty Memorial was dedicated on 1 November 1921.

The British government budgeted substantial resources to the commemoration of the war during the period 2014 to 2018. The lead body is the Imperial War Museum. On 3 August 2014, French President François Hollande and German President Joachim Gauck together marked the centenary of Germany's declaration of war on France by laying the first stone of a memorial in Vieil Armand, known in German as Hartmannswillerkopf, for French and German soldiers killed in the war. As part of commemorations for the centenary of the 1918 Armistice, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel visited the site of the signing of the Armistice of Compiègne and unveiled a plaque to reconciliation.

Historiography

... "Strange, friend," I said, "Here is no cause to mourn."
"None," said the other, "Save the undone years"... 

— Wilfred Owen, Strange Meeting, 1918

The first efforts to comprehend the meaning and consequences of modern warfare began during the initial phases of the war and are still underway more than a century later. Teaching World War I has presented special challenges. When compared with World War II, the First World War is often thought to be "a wrong war fought for the wrong reasons"; it lacks the metanarrative of good versus evil that characterises retellings of the Second World War. Lacking recognizable heroes and villains, it is often taught thematically, invoking simplified tropes that obscure the complexity of the conflict.

Historian Heather Jones argues that the historiography has been reinvigorated by a cultural turn in the 21st century. Scholars have raised entirely new questions regarding military occupation, radicalisation of politics, race, medical science, gender and mental health. Among the major subjects that historians have long debated regarding the war include: Why the war began; why the Allies won; whether generals were responsible for high casualty rates; how soldiers endured the poor conditions of trench warfare; and to what extent the civilian home front accepted and endorsed the war effort.

Unexploded ordnance

As late as 2007, unexploded ordnance at battlefield sites like Verdun and Somme continued to pose a danger. In France and Belgium, locals who discover caches of unexploded munitions are assisted by weapons disposal units. In some places, plant life has still not recovered from the effects of the war.

See also

  • Lists of World War I topics
  • List of military engagements of World War I
  • Outline of World War I
  • World war
  • World War II
  • Freemasonry during World War I
  • List of wars by death toll

Footnotes

  1. The Russian Empire during 1914–1917, the Russian Republic during 1917. The Bolshevik government signed a separate peace with the Central Powers shortly after their armed seizure of power, resulting in a Central Powers victory on the Eastern Front of the war, and the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic's defeat. However, this peace treaty was nullified by an Allied Powers victory on the Western Front, and the end of the war.
  2. Often abbreviated as WWI or WW1
  3. Only the Triple Alliance was a formal "alliance"; the others listed were informal patterns of support.
  4. German: Skagerrakschlacht, or "Battle of the Skagerrak"
  5. Bessarabia remained part of Romania until 1940, when it was annexed by Joseph Stalin as the Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic; following the dissolution of the USSR in 1991, it became the independent Republic of Moldova
  6. Unlike the others, the successor state to the Russian Empire, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, retained similar external borders, via retaining or quickly recovering lost territories.
  7. A German attempt to use chemical weapons on the Russian front in January 1915 failed to cause casualties.
  8. 109 in this context – see Long and short scales
  9. World War I officially ended when Germany paid off the final amount of reparations imposed on it by the Allies.

References

  1. Braybon 2004, p. 8.
  2. "The Great War". The Independent. 17 August 1914. p. 228. Retrieved 17 May 2022.
  3. "great, adj., adv., and n". Oxford English Dictionary. Archived from the original on 14 May 2019. Retrieved 19 March 2012.
  4. "The war to end all wars". BBC News. 10 November 1998. Archived from the original on 19 June 2015. Retrieved 15 December 2015.
  5. Shapiro & Epstein 2006, p. 329.
  6. Clark 2013, pp. 121–152.
  7. Zeldin 1977, p. 117.
  8. Joly, Bertrand (1999). "La France et la Revanche (1871–1914)". Revue d'Histoire Moderne & Contemporaine. 46 (2): 325–347. JSTOR 20530431. Archived from the original on 27 January 2024.
  9. Keegan 1998, p. 52.
  10. Medlicott 1945, pp. 66–70.
  11. Kennan 1986, p. 20.
  12. Willmott 2003, p. 15.
  13. Fay 1930, pp. 290–293.
  14. Willmott 2003, p. 21.
  15. Herwig 1988, pp. 72–73.
  16. Moll & Luebbert 1980, pp. 153–185.
  17. Stevenson 2016, p. 45.
  18. Crisp 1976, pp. 174–196.
  19. Stevenson 2016, p. 42.
  20. McMeekin 2015, pp. 66–67.
  21. Clark 2013, p. 86.
  22. Clark 2013, pp. 251–252.
  23. McMeekin 2015, p. 69.
  24. McMeekin 2015, p. 73.
  25. Willmott 2003, pp. 2–23.
  26. Clark 2013, p. 288.
  27. Keegan 1998, pp. 48–49.
  28. Bennett, G. H. (1995). Bennett, G. H. (ed.). "Eastern Europe: Cordon Sanitaire or Powder-Keg?". British Foreign Policy during the Curzon Period, 1919–24. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 41–59. doi:10.1057/9780230377356_3. ISBN 978-0-230-37735-6. Archived from the original on 10 June 2024. Retrieved 10 June 2024.
  29. Stefanova, Radoslava (2001). "Balkan Clutter: American and European Handling of a Powder Keg". Revival: The New Transatlantic Agenda. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-315-18640-5. Archived from the original on 10 June 2024. Retrieved 10 June 2024.
  30. Nelson, Daniel N. (1984). "South-Eastern Europe After Tito: A Powder-Keg for the 1980s? Edited by David Carlton and Carlo Schaerf. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1983. xviii, 211 pp. Map. $22.50". Slavic Review. 43 (4): 717–718. doi:10.2307/2499359. ISSN 0037-6779. JSTOR 2499359. Archived from the original on 10 June 2024. Retrieved 10 June 2024.
  31. Finestone 1981, p. 247.
  32. Smith 2010, He was photographed on the way to the station and the photograph has been reproduced many times in books and articles, claiming to depict the arrest of Gavrilo Princip. But there is no photograph of Gavro's arrest—this photograph shows the arrest of Behr..
  33. Butcher 2014, p. 103.
  34. Butcher 2014, pp. 188–189.
  35. Gilbert 1994, p. 16.
  36. Willmott 2003, p. 26.
  37. Clark, Christopher (25 June 2014). Month of Madness. BBC Radio 4. Archived from the original on 20 April 2017. Retrieved 14 March 2017.
  38. Djordjević, Dimitrije; Spence, Richard B. (1992). Scholar, patriot, mentor: historical essays in honour of Dimitrije Djordjević. East European Monographs. p. 313. ISBN 978-0-88033-217-0. Archived from the original on 17 February 2024. Retrieved 12 November 2018. Following the assassination of Franz Ferdinand in June 1914, Croats and Muslims in Sarajevo joined forces in an anti-Serb pogrom.
  39. Reports Service: Southeast Europe series. American Universities Field Staff. 1964. p. 44. Archived from the original on 6 September 2023. Retrieved 7 December 2013. ... the assassination was followed by officially encouraged anti-Serb riots in Sarajevo ...
  40. Kröll, Herbert (2008). Austrian-Greek encounters over the centuries: history, diplomacy, politics, arts, economics. Studienverlag. p. 55. ISBN 978-3-7065-4526-6. Archived from the original on 17 February 2024. Retrieved 1 September 2013. ... arrested and interned some 5.500 prominent Serbs and sentenced to death some 460 persons, a new Schutzkorps, an auxiliary militia, widened the anti-Serb repression.
  41. Tomasevich 2001, p. 485.
  42. Schindler, John R. (2007). Unholy Terror: Bosnia, Al-Qa'ida, and the Rise of Global Jihad. Zenith Imprint. p. 29. ISBN 978-1-61673-964-5. Archived from the original on 17 February 2024. Retrieved 12 November 2018.
  43. Velikonja 2003, p. 141.
  44. Stevenson 1996, p. 12.
  45. MacMillan 2013, p. 532.
  46. Willmott 2003, p. 27.
  47. Fromkin 2004, pp. 196–197.
  48. MacMillan 2013, p. 536.
  49. Lieven 2016, p. 326.
  50. Clark 2013, pp. 526–527.
  51. Martel 2014, p. 335.
  52. Gilbert 1994, p. 27.
  53. Clayton 2003, p. 45.
  54. Clark 2013, pp. 539–541.
  55. Gilbert 1994, p. 29.
  56. MacMillan 2013, pp. 579–580, 585.
  57. Crowe 2001, pp. 4–5.
  58. Willmott 2003, p. 29.
  59. Clark 2013, pp. 550–551.
  60. Strachan 2003, pp. 292–296, 343–354.
  61. Tucker & Roberts 2005, p. 172.
  62. Schindler 2002, pp. 159–195.
  63. "Veliki rat – Avijacija". rts.rs. RTS, Radio televizija Srbije, Radio Television of Serbia. Archived from the original on 10 July 2017. Retrieved 16 July 2019.
  64. "How was the first military airplane shot down". National Geographic. Archived from the original on 31 August 2015. Retrieved 5 August 2015.
  65. Stevenson 2004, p. 22.
  66. Horne 1964, p. 22.
  67. Stevenson 2004, p. 23.
  68. Holmes 2014, pp. 194, 211.
  69. Stevenson 2012, p. 54.
  70. Jackson 2018, p. 55.
  71. Lieven 2016, p. 327.
  72. Tucker & Roberts 2005, pp. 376–378.
  73. Horne 1964, p. 221.
  74. Donko 2012, p. 79.
  75. Keegan 1998, pp. 224–232.
  76. Falls 1960, pp. 79–80.
  77. Farwell 1989, p. 353.
  78. Brown 1994, pp. 197–198.
  79. Brown 1994, pp. 201–203.
  80. Kant, Vedica (24 September 2014). "India and WWI: Piecing together the impact of the Great War on the subcontinent". LSE. Archived from the original on 28 September 2022. Retrieved 28 September 2022.
  81. "Participants from the Indian subcontinent in the First World War". Memorial Gates Trust. Archived from the original on 1 July 2019. Retrieved 12 December 2008.
  82. Horniman, Benjamin Guy (1984). British administration and the Amritsar massacre. Mittal Publications. p. 45.
  83. Raudzens 1990, p. 424.
  84. Raudzens 1990, pp. 421–423.
  85. Gilbert 1994, p. 99.
  86. Goodspeed 1985, p. 199.
  87. Duffy, Michael (22 August 2009). "Weapons of War: Poison Gas". Firstworldwar.com. Archived from the original on 21 August 2007. Retrieved 5 July 2012.
  88. Love 1996.
  89. Dupuy 1993, p. 1042.
  90. Grant 2005, p. 276.
  91. Lichfield, John (21 February 2006). "Verdun: myths and memories of the 'lost villages' of France". The Independent. Archived from the original on 22 October 2017. Retrieved 23 July 2013.
  92. Harris 2008, p. 271.
  93. Chorba, Terence (November 2018). "Trench Conflict with Combatants and Infectious Disease". Emerging Infectious Diseases. 24 (11). CDC: 2136–2137. doi:10.3201/eid2411.ac2411. ISSN 1080-6040. Archived from the original on 10 June 2024. Retrieved 29 February 2024.
  94. Taylor 2007, pp. 39–47.
  95. Keene 2006, p. 5.
  96. Halpern 1995, p. 293.
  97. Zieger 2001, p. 50.
  98. Black, Jeremy (June 2016). "Jutland's Place in History". Naval History. 30 (3): 16–21.
  99. Sheffield, Garry. "The First Battle of the Atlantic". World Wars in Depth. BBC. Archived from the original on 3 June 2019. Retrieved 11 November 2009.
  100. Gilbert 1994, p. 306.
  101. von der Porten 1969.
  102. Jones 2001, p. 80.
  103. Nova Scotia House of Assembly Committee on Veterans Affairs (9 November 2006). "Committee Hansard". Hansard. Archived from the original on 23 November 2011. Retrieved 12 March 2013.
  104. Chickering, Roger; Förster, Stig; Greiner, Bernd (2005). A world at total war: global conflict and the politics of destruction, 1937–1945. Publications of the German Historical Institute. Washington, DC: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-83432-2. Archived from the original on 17 February 2024. Retrieved 12 November 2018.
  105. Price 1980.
  106. Tucker & Roberts 2005, p. 241–.
  107. Neiberg 2005, pp. 54–55.
  108. Tucker & Roberts 2005, pp. 1075–1076.
  109. DiNardo 2015, p. 102.
  110. Neiberg 2005, pp. 108–110.
  111. Hall, Richard (2010). Balkan Breakthrough: The Battle of Dobro Pole 1918. Indiana University Press. p. 11. ISBN 978-0-253-35452-5.
  112. "The Balkan Wars and World War I". p. 28. Library of Congress Country Studies.
  113. Tucker, Wood & Murphy 1999, pp. 150–152.
  114. Korsun, N. "The Balkan Front of the World War" (in Russian). militera.lib.ru. Archived from the original on 9 August 2013. Retrieved 27 September 2010.
  115. Doughty 2005, p. 491.
  116. Gettleman, Marvin; Schaar, Stuart, eds. (2003). The Middle East and Islamic world reader (4th ed.). New York: Grove Press. pp. 119–120. ISBN 978-0-8021-3936-8.
  117. January, Brendan (2007). Genocide: modern crimes against humanity. Minneapolis, Minn.: Twenty-First Century Books. p. 14. ISBN 978-0-7613-3421-7.
  118. Lieberman, Benjamin (2013). The Holocaust and Genocides in Europe. New York: Continuum Publishing Corporation. pp. 80–81. ISBN 978-1-4411-9478-7.
  119. Arthur J. Barker, The Neglected War: Mesopotamia, 1914–1918 (London: Faber, 1967)
  120. Crawford, John; McGibbon, Ian (2007). New Zealand's Great War: New Zealand, the Allies and the First World War. Exisle Publishing. pp. 219–220.
  121. Fromkin 2004, p. 119.
  122. Hinterhoff 1984, pp. 499–503.
  123. The Encyclopedia Americana, 1920, v. 28, p. 403
  124. Northcote, Dudley S. (1922). "Saving Forty Thousand Armenians". Current History. New York Times Co. Archived from the original on 9 September 2021. Retrieved 9 September 2021.
  125. Sachar 1970, pp. 122–138.
  126. Gilbert 1994.
  127. Hanioglu, M. Sukru (2010). A Brief History of the Late Ottoman Empire. Princeton University Press. pp. 180–181. ISBN 978-0-691-13452-9.
  128. Thompson 2009, p. 13.
  129. Thompson 2009, pp. 9–10.
  130. Gardner 2015, p. 120.
  131. Thompson 2009, p. 14.
  132. Thompson 2009, pp. 30–31.
  133. Gilbert 1994, p. 166.
  134. Thompson 2009, p. 57.
  135. Marshall & Josephy 1982, p. 108.
  136. Fornassin 2017, pp. 39–62.
  137. Thompson 2009, p. 163.
  138. Gilbert 1994, p. 317.
  139. Gilbert 1994, p. 482.
  140. Gilbert 1994, p. 484.
  141. Thompson 2009, p. 364.
  142. Gilbert 1994, p. 491.
  143. Tucker & Roberts 2005, p. 715.
  144. Meyer 2006, pp. 152–154, 161, 163, 175, 182.
  145. Smele 2011.
  146. Schindler 2003, p. ?.
  147. Tucker 2002, p. 119.
  148. Lawrence Goodrich (2011). Cultural Studies. Jones & Bartlett Learning. p. 376. ISBN 9781449637286. Archived from the original on 20 August 2023. Retrieved 30 July 2023.
  149. Jelavich 1992, pp. 441–442.
  150. Dumitru 2012, p. 171.
  151. Dumitru 2012, p. 170.
  152. Gilbert 1994, p. 282.
  153. Torrie 1978, pp. 7–8.
  154. Barrett 2013, pp. 96–98.
  155. România în anii primului război mondial (in Romanian). Vol. 2. p. 831.
  156. Hitchins, Keith (1994). Rumania 1866–1947. Clarendon Press. p. 269.
  157. Crampton 1994, pp. 24–25.
  158. Béla 1998, p. 429.
  159. Rothschild 1975, p. 314.
  160. Alexander Lanoszka; Michael A. Hunzeker (11 November 2018). "Why the First War lasted so long". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 12 April 2022. Retrieved 11 November 2018.
  161. Keegan 1998, p. 345.
  162. Kernek 1970, pp. 721–766.
  163. Beckett 2007, p. 523.
  164. Winter 2014, pp. 110–132.
  165. Wheeler-Bennett 1938, pp. 36–41.
  166. Treaty of Bucharest with the Central Powers in May 1918
  167. Stevenson 2012, pp. 315–316.
  168. Stevenson 2012, p. 317.
  169. Gilbert 1994, p. 318.
  170. Grotelueschen 2006, pp. 14–15.
  171. Stevenson 2012, p. 318.
  172. Grotelueschen 2006, pp. 44–46.
  173. Stevenson 2012, p. 403.
  174. Clayton 2003, p. 124.
  175. Clayton 2003, p. 129.
  176. Strachan 2003, p. 244.
  177. Inglis 1995, p. 2.
  178. Humphries 2007, p. 66.
  179. Horne 1964, p. 323.
  180. Erickson 2001, p. 163.
  181. Moore, A. Briscoe (1920). The Mounted Riflemen in Sinai & Palestine: The Story of New Zealand's Crusaders. Christchurch: Whitcombe & Tombs. p. 67. OCLC 156767391.
  182. Falls, Cyril (1930). Military Operations. Part I Egypt & Palestine: Volume 2 From June 1917 to the End of the War. Official History of the Great War Based on Official Documents by Direction of the Historical Section of the Committee of Imperial Defence. Maps compiled by A.F. Becke. London: HM Stationery Office. p. 59. OCLC 1113542987.
  183. Wavell, Earl (1968) [1933]. "The Palestine Campaigns". In Sheppard, Eric William (ed.). A Short History of the British Army (4th ed.). London: Constable & Co. pp. 153–155. OCLC 35621223.
  184. "Text of the Decree of the Surrender of Jerusalem into British Control". First World War.com. Archived from the original on 14 June 2011. Retrieved 13 May 2015.
  185. Bruce, Anthony (2002). The Last Crusade: The Palestine Campaign in the First World War. London: John Murray. p. 162. ISBN 978-0-7195-5432-2.
  186. "Who's Who – Kress von Kressenstein". First World War.com. Archived from the original on 20 November 2015. Retrieved 13 May 2015.
  187. "Who's Who – Otto Liman von Sanders". First World War.com. Archived from the original on 27 December 2007. Retrieved 13 May 2015.
  188. Erickson 2001, p. 195.
  189. Ayers 1919, p. 104.
  190. Heyman 1997, pp. 146–147.
  191. Westwell 2004.
  192. Gray 1991, p. 86.
  193. Rickard 2007.
  194. Schreiber, Shane B. (2004) [1977]. Shock Army of the British Empire: The Canadian Corps in the Last 100 Days of the Great War. St. Catharines, ON: Vanwell. p. 50. ISBN 978-1-55125-096-0. OCLC 57063659.
  195. Rickard 2001.
  196. Brown, Malcolm (1999) [1998]. 1918: Year of Victory. London: Pan. p. 190. ISBN 978-0-330-37672-3.
  197. Gray & Argyle 1990.
  198. McLellan, p. 49.
  199. Christie 1997, p. ?.
  200. "The Battle of Dobro Polje – The Forgotten Balkan Skirmish That Ended WW1". Militaryhistorynow.com. Archived from the original on 23 September 2017. Retrieved 21 November 2019.
  201. "The Germans Could no Longer Keep up the Fight". historycollection.co. 22 February 2017. Archived from the original on 23 December 2019. Retrieved 21 November 2019.
  202. "1918 Timeline". League of Nations Photo Archive. Archived from the original on 5 May 2016. Retrieved 20 November 2009.
  203. "The Battle of Dobro Polje – The Forgotten Balkan Skirmish That Ended WW1". Militaryhistorynow.com. 21 September 2017. Archived from the original on 23 September 2017. Retrieved 21 November 2019.
  204. "The Germans Could no Longer Keep up the Fight". historycollection.com. 22 February 2017. Archived from the original on 23 December 2019. Retrieved 21 November 2019.
  205. Axelrod 2018, p. 260.
  206. Andrea di Michele (2014). "Trento, Bolzano e Innsbruck: l'occupazione militare italiana del Tirolo (1918–1920)" [Trento, Bolzano and Innsbruck: The Italian Military Occupation of Tyrol (1918–1920)] (PDF). Trento e Trieste. Percorsi degli Italiani d'Austria dal '48 all'annessione (in Italian): 436–437. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 October 2018. La forza numerica del contingente italiano variò con il passare dei mesi e al suo culmine raggiunse i 20–22.000 uomini. [The numerical strength of the Italian contingent varied with the passing of months and at its peak reached 20–22,000 men.]
  207. "Clairière de l'Armistice" (in French). Ville de Compiègne. Archived from the original on 27 August 2007.
  208. Stevenson 2004, p. 385.
  209. K. Kuhl. "Die 14 Kieler Punkte" [The Kiel 14 points] (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 April 2019. Retrieved 23 November 2018.
  210. Dähnhardt, D. (1978). Revolution in Kiel. Neumünster: Karl Wachholtz Verlag. p. 91. ISBN 978-3-529-02636-2.
  211. Wette, Wolfram (2006). "Die Novemberrevolution – Kiel 1918". In Fleischhauer; Turowski (eds.). Kieler Erinnerungsorte. Boyens.
  212. Stevenson 2004, p. 383.
  213. Stevenson 2004, Chapter 17.
  214. "France's oldest WWI veteran dies" Archived 28 October 2016 at the Wayback Machine, BBC News, 20 January 2008.
  215. Tucker & Roberts 2005, p. 273.
  216. Hastedt, Glenn P. (2009). Encyclopedia of American Foreign Policy. Infobase Publishing. p. 483. ISBN 978-1-4381-0989-3.
  217. Murrin, John; Johnson, Paul; McPherson, James; Gerstle, Gary; Fahs, Alice (2010). Liberty, Equality, Power: A History of the American People. Vol. II. Cengage Learning. p. 622. ISBN 978-0-495-90383-3.
  218. "Harding Ends War; Signs Peace Decree at Senator's Home. Thirty Persons Witness Momentous Act in Frelinghuysen Living Room at Raritan". The New York Times. 3 July 1921. Archived from the original on 4 December 2013. Retrieved 18 September 2017.
  219. "No. 31773". The London Gazette. 10 February 1920. p. 1671.
  220. "No. 31991". The London Gazette. 23 July 1920. pp. 7765–7766.
  221. "No. 13627". The London Gazette. 27 August 1920. p. 1924.
  222. "No. 32421". The London Gazette. 12 August 1921. pp. 6371–6372.
  223. "No. 32964". The London Gazette. 12 August 1924. pp. 6030–6031.
  224. "Dates on war memorials" (PDF). War Memorials Trust. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 January 2021. Retrieved 4 January 2021.
  225. Magliveras 1999, pp. 8–12.
  226. Northedge 1986, pp. 35–36.
  227. Morrow, John H. (2005). The Great War: An Imperial History. London: Routledge. p. 290. ISBN 978-0-415-20440-8.
  228. Schulze, Hagen (1998). Germany: A New History. Harvard University Press. p. 204.
  229. Ypersele, Laurence Van (2012). "Mourning and Memory, 1919–45". In Horne, John (ed.). A Companion to World War I. Wiley. p. 584.
  230. "The Surrogate Hegemon in Polish Postcolonial Discourse Ewa Thompson, Rice University" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 October 2013. Retrieved 27 October 2013.
  231. "Open-Site:Hungary". Archived from the original on 3 January 2022. Retrieved 11 January 2022.
  232. Frucht, p. 356.
  233. Kocsis, Károly; Hodosi, Eszter Kocsisné (1998). Ethnic Geography of the Hungarian Minorities in the Carpathian Basin. Geographical Research Institute, Research Centre and Earth Sciences. p. 19. ISBN 978-963-7395-84-0.
  234. Clark 1927.
  235. "Appeals to Americans to Pray for Serbians" (PDF). The New York Times. 27 July 1918. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 September 2018. Retrieved 12 June 2018.
  236. "Serbia Restored" (PDF). The New York Times. 5 November 1918. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 September 2018. Retrieved 12 June 2018.
  237. Simpson, Matt (22 August 2009). "The Minor Powers During World War One – Serbia". firstworldwar.com. Archived from the original on 27 April 2010. Retrieved 27 May 2010.
  238. Cas Mudde. Racist Extremism in Central and Eastern Europe Archived 15 May 2016 at the Wayback Machine
  239. "'ANZAC Day' in London; King, Queen, and General Birdwood at Services in Abbey". The New York Times. 26 April 1916. Archived from the original on 15 July 2016. Retrieved 25 July 2018.
  240. Australian War Memorial. "The ANZAC Day tradition". Australian War Memorial. Archived from the original on 1 May 2008. Retrieved 2 May 2008.
  241. "The Diaspora Welcomes the Pope" Archived 4 June 2012 at the Wayback Machine, Der Spiegel Online. 28 November 2006.
  242. Rummel, R.J. (1998). "The Holocaust in Comparative and Historical Perspective". Idea Journal of Social Issues. 3 (2).
  243. Hedges, Chris (17 September 2000). "A Few Words in Greek Tell of a Homeland Lost". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 25 November 2018. Retrieved 23 February 2017.
  244. "World War I: Killed, wounded, and missing". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 5 December 2021.
  245. "War Losses". International Encyclopedia of the First World War. Retrieved 5 December 2021.
  246. Kitchen 2000, p. 22.
  247. Sévillia, Jean, Histoire Passionnée de la France, 2013, p. 395
  248. Howard 1993, p. 166.
  249. Saadi 2009.
  250. Tschanz.
  251. Spreeuwenberg 2018, pp. 2561–2567.
  252. Knobler et al. 2005.
  253. Ansart, Séverine; Pelat, Camille; Boelle, Pierre-Yves; Carrat, Fabrice; Flahault, Antoine; Valleron, Alain-Jacques (May 2009). "Mortality burden of the 1918–1919 influenza pandemic in Europe". Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses. 3 (3). Wiley: 99–106. doi:10.1111/j.1750-2659.2009.00080.x. PMC 4634693. PMID 19453486.
  254. K. von Economo.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 10 May 1917, 30: 581–585. Die Encephalitis lethargica. Leipzig and Vienna, Franz Deuticke, 1918.
  255. Reid, A. H.; McCall, S.; Henry, J. M.; Taubenberger, J. K. (2001). "Experimenting on the Past: The Enigma of von Economo's Encephalitis Lethargica". J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 60 (7): 663–670. doi:10.1093/jnen/60.7.663. PMID 11444794. S2CID 40754090.
  256. "War Horse: The True Story". Alberta Animal Health Source. 10 November 2020. Archived from the original on 8 January 2024. Retrieved 8 January 2024.
  257. "History of United States' Involvement in Chemical Warfare". www.denix.osd.mil. Archived from the original on 1 March 2024. Retrieved 1 March 2024.
  258. Fitzgerald, Gerard (April 2008). "Chemical Warfare and Medical Response During World War I". American Journal of Public Health. 98 (4): 611–625. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2007.11930. PMC 2376985. PMID 18356568.
  259. Taylor, Telford (1993). The Anatomy of the Nuremberg Trials: A Personal Memoir. Little, Brown and Company. p. 34. ISBN 978-0-316-83400-1. Retrieved 20 June 2013 – via Internet Archive.
  260. Graham, Thomas; Lavera, Damien J. (2003). Cornerstones of Security: Arms Control Treaties in the Nuclear Era. University of Washington Press. pp. 7–9. ISBN 978-0-295-98296-0. Retrieved 5 July 2013.
  261. Morgenthau, Henry (1918). "XXV: Talaat Tells Why He "Deports" the Armenians". Ambassador Mogenthau's story. Brigham Young University. Archived from the original on 12 June 2012. Retrieved 6 June 2012.
  262. International Association of Genocide Scholars (13 June 2005). "Open Letter to the Prime Minister of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdoğan". Archived from the original on 6 October 2007.
  263. Vartparonian, Paul Leverkuehn; Kaiser (2008). A German officer during the Armenian genocide: a biography of Max von Scheubner-Richter. translated by Alasdair Lean; with a preface by Jorge and a historical introduction by Hilmar. London: Taderon Press for the Gomidas Institute. ISBN 978-1-903656-81-5. Archived from the original on 26 March 2017. Retrieved 14 May 2016.
  264. Ferguson 2006, p. 177.
  265. "International Association of Genocide Scholars" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 October 2017. Retrieved 12 March 2013.
  266. Fromkin 1989, pp. 212–215.
  267. International Association of Genocide Scholars. "Resolution on genocides committed by the Ottoman empire" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 April 2008.
  268. Gaunt, David (2006). Massacres, Resistance, Protectors: Muslim-Christian Relations in Eastern Anatolia during World War I. Piscataway, New Jersey: Gorgias Press.[permanent dead link]
  269. Schaller, Dominik J.; Zimmerer, Jürgen (2008). "Late Ottoman genocides: the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire and Young Turkish population and extermination policies – introduction". Journal of Genocide Research. 10 (1): 7–14. doi:10.1080/14623520801950820. S2CID 71515470.
  270. Whitehorn, Alan (2015). The Armenian Genocide: The Essential Reference Guide: The Essential Reference Guide. ABC-CLIO. pp. 83, 218. ISBN 978-1-61069-688-3. Archived from the original on 1 August 2020. Retrieved 11 November 2018.
  271. Phillimore & Bellot 1919, pp. 4–64.
  272. Ferguson 1999, pp. 368–369.
  273. Havighurst 1985, p. 131.
  274. Ward, Alan J. (1974). "Lloyd George and the 1918 Irish conscription crisis". Historical Journal. 17 (1): 107–129. doi:10.1017/S0018246X00005689. S2CID 162360809.
  275. Main, J. M. (1970). Conscription: the Australian debate, 1901–1970. Archived from the original on 7 July 2015.
  276. "Commonwealth Parliament from 1901 to World War I". Parliament of Australia. 4 May 2015. Archived from the original on 15 December 2018. Retrieved 15 December 2018.
  277. "The Conscription Crisis". CBC. 2001. Archived from the original on 13 July 2014. Retrieved 14 August 2014.
  278. Chelmsford, J. E. (15 April 1918). "Clergy and Man-Power". The Times. p. 12.
  279. Chambers, John Whiteclay (1987). To Raise an Army: The Draft Comes to Modern America. New York: The Free Press. ISBN 978-0-02-905820-6.
  280. Zinn, Howard (2003). A People's History of the United States. Harper Collins. p. 134. ISBN 978-0-06-052842-3.
  281. Pedersen, Sarah (1 May 2002). "A Surfeit of Socks? The Impact of the First World War on Women Correspondents to Daily Newspapers". Journal of Scottish Historical Studies. 22 (1): 50–72. doi:10.3366/jshs.2002.22.1.50. hdl:10059/294. ISSN 1748-538X. PMID 19489175. Archived from the original on 10 June 2024. Retrieved 10 June 2024.
  282. Trumpener, Ulrich (4 November 1987). "The Service Attachés and Military Plenipotentiaries of Imperial Germany, 1871–1918". The International History Review. 9 (4): 621–638. doi:10.1080/07075332.1987.9640462. ISSN 0707-5332. Archived from the original on 1 July 2022. Retrieved 10 June 2024.
  283. Craig, Gordon A. (1949). "Military Diplomats in the Prussian and German Service: The Attachés, 1816- 1914". Political Science Quarterly. 64 (1): 65–94. doi:10.2307/2144182. ISSN 0032-3195. JSTOR 2144182. Archived from the original on 1 July 2022. Retrieved 10 June 2024.
  284. Noakes, Lucy (2006). Women in the British Army: War and the Gentle Sex, 1907–1948. Abingdon, England: Routledge. p. 48. ISBN 978-0-415-39056-9.
  285. Cosgrave, Jenny (10 March 2015). "UK finally finishes paying for World War I". CNBC. Archived from the original on 20 March 2023. Retrieved 20 March 2023.
  286. Green 1938, p. cxxvi.
  287. Anton Kaes; Martin Jay; Edward Dimendberg, eds. (1994). "The Treaty of Versailles: The Reparations Clauses". The Weimar Republic Sourcebook. University of California Press. p. 8. ISBN 978-0-520-90960-1. Archived from the original on 15 January 2016. Retrieved 11 December 2015.
  288. Marks 1978, pp. 231–232.
  289. Marks 1978, p. 237.
  290. Marks 1978, pp. 223–234.
  291. Stone, Norman (2008). World War One: A Short History. London: Penguin. ISBN 978-0-14-103156-9.
  292. Marks 1978, p. 233.
  293. Hall, Allan (28 September 2010). "First World War officially ends". The Telegraph. Berlin. Archived from the original on 10 January 2022. Retrieved 15 March 2017.
  294. Suddath, Claire (4 October 2010). "Why Did World War I Just End?". Time. Archived from the original on 5 October 2010. Retrieved 1 July 2013.
  295. "World War I to finally end for Germany this weekend". CNN. 30 September 2010. Archived from the original on 16 March 2017. Retrieved 15 March 2017.
  296. MacMillan, Margaret (25 December 2010). "Ending the War to End All Wars". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 16 March 2017. Retrieved 15 March 2017.
  297. Souter 2000, p. 354.
  298. Tucker & Roberts 2005, p. 1189.
  299. Tucker & Roberts 2005, p. 1001.
  300. Tucker & Roberts 2005, p. 117.
  301. Mukhtar, Mohammed (2003). Historical Dictionary of Somalia. Scarecrow Press. p. 126. ISBN 978-0-8108-6604-1. Archived from the original on 13 April 2021. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  302. "How Ethiopian prince scuppered Germany's WW1 plans". BBC News. 25 September 2016. Archived from the original on 13 April 2020. Retrieved 28 Februa

World War I or the First World War 28 July 1914 11 November 1918 also known as the Great War was a global conflict between two coalitions the Allies or Entente and the Central Powers Fighting took place mainly in Europe and the Middle East as well as in parts of Africa and the Asia Pacific and in Europe was characterised by trench warfare the widespread use of artillery machine guns and chemical weapons gas and the introductions of tanks and aircraft World War I was one of the deadliest conflicts in history resulting in an estimated 10 million military dead and more than 20 million wounded plus some 10 million civilian dead from causes including genocide The movement of large numbers of people was a major factor in the deadly Spanish flu pandemic World War IFrom top to bottom left to right French attack from a trench at the Battle of Verdun 1916 British artillery in action at the Battle of the Somme 1916 U S troops and Renault FT tanks during the Hundred Days Offensive 1918 British Vickers machine gun crew wearing gas masks during the Battle of the Somme 1916 Ottoman Arab camel corps leaving for the Middle Eastern front 1916 Aftermath of the Russian siege of Przemysl in Austria Hungary 1915Date28 July 1914 11 November 1918 4 years 3 months and 14 days LocationEurope Middle East Africa Pacific Atlantic Mediterranean and AdriaticResultAllied Powers victory see Aftermath of World War I Territorial changesPartition of the Ottoman Empire dissolution of Austria Hungary transfer of German colonies and territories to other countriesFormation of new countries in Europe and the Middle East such as Poland Yugoslavia Weimar Germany Soviet Russia and Soviet Union Lithuania Estonia Latvia Austria Hungary Czechoslovakia Turkey Hejaz and YemenBelligerentsAllied Powers France United Kingdom and Empire AustraliaCanada Ceylon Egypt Newfoundland New Zealand India South Africa Russia Italy from 1915 United States from 1917 Japan and others Central Powers Germany Austria Hungary Ottoman Empire Bulgaria from 1915 and others Commanders and leadersSee Main Allied leadersSee Main Central leadersCasualties and lossesMilitary dead Over 5 525 000 Civilian dead Over 4 000 000 Total dead Over 9 000 000 further detailsMilitary dead Over 4 386 000 Civilian dead Over 3 700 000 Total dead Over 8 000 000 further details The causes of World War I included the rise of Germany and decline of the Ottoman Empire which disturbed the long standing balance of power in Europe as well as economic competition between nations triggered by industrialisation and imperialism Growing tensions between the great powers and in the Balkans reached a breaking point on 28 June 1914 when a Bosnian Serb assassinated the heir to the Austro Hungarian throne Austria Hungary blamed Serbia and declared war on 28 July After Russia mobilised in Serbia s defence Germany declared war on Russia and France who had an alliance The United Kingdom entered after Germany invaded Belgium whose neutrality it guaranteed and the Ottomans joined the Central Powers in November Germany s strategy in 1914 was to quickly defeat France then transfer its forces to the east but its advance was halted in September and by the end of the year the Western Front consisted of a continuous line of trenches stretching from the English Channel to Switzerland The Eastern Front was more dynamic but neither side gained a decisive advantage despite costly offensives Italy Bulgaria Romania Greece and others joined in from 1915 onward Major battles including at Verdun the Somme and Passchendaele failed to break the stalemate on the Western Front In April 1917 the United States joined the Allies after Germany resumed unrestricted submarine warfare against Atlantic shipping Later that year the Bolsheviks seized power in Russia in the October Revolution Soviet Russia signed an armistice with the Central Powers in December followed by a separate peace in March 1918 That month Germany launched a spring offensive in the west which despite initial successes left the German Army exhausted and demoralised The Allied Hundred Days Offensive beginning in August 1918 caused a collapse of the German front line By early November Bulgaria the Ottoman Empire and Austria Hungary had each signed armistices with the Allies leaving Germany isolated Facing a revolution at home Kaiser Wilhelm II abdicated on 9 November and the war ended with the Armistice of 11 November 1918 The Paris Peace Conference of 1919 1920 imposed settlements on the defeated powers most notably the Treaty of Versailles by which Germany lost significant territories was disarmed and was required to pay large war reparations to the Allies The dissolution of the Russian German Austro Hungarian and Ottoman Empires redrew national boundaries and resulted in the creation of new independent states including Poland Finland the Baltic states Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia The League of Nations was established to maintain world peace but its failure to manage instability during the interwar period contributed to the outbreak of World War II in 1939 NamesBefore World War II the events of 1914 1918 were generally known as the Great War or simply the World War In August 1914 the magazine The Independent wrote This is the Great War It names itself In October 1914 the Canadian magazine Maclean s similarly wrote Some wars name themselves This is the Great War Contemporary Europeans also referred to it as the war to end war and it was also described as the war to end all wars due to their perception of its unparalleled scale devastation and loss of life The first recorded use of the term First World War was in September 1914 by German biologist and philosopher Ernst Haeckel who stated There is no doubt that the course and character of the feared European War will become the first world war in the full sense of the word BackgroundPolitical and military alliances Rival military coalitions in 1914 Triple Entente Triple Alliance For much of the 19th century the major European powers maintained a tenuous balance of power known as the Concert of Europe After 1848 this was challenged by Britain s withdrawal into so called splendid isolation the decline of the Ottoman Empire New Imperialism and the rise of Prussia under Otto von Bismarck Victory in the 1870 1871 Franco Prussian War allowed Bismarck to consolidate a German Empire Post 1871 the primary aim of French policy was to avenge this defeat but by the early 1890s this had switched to the expansion of the French colonial empire In 1873 Bismarck negotiated the League of the Three Emperors which included Austria Hungary Russia and Germany After the 1877 1878 Russo Turkish War the League was dissolved due to Austrian concerns over the expansion of Russian influence in the Balkans an area they considered to be of vital strategic interest Germany and Austria Hungary then formed the 1879 Dual Alliance which became the Triple Alliance when Italy joined in 1882 For Bismarck the purpose of these agreements was to isolate France by ensuring the three empires resolved any disputes between themselves In 1887 Bismarck set up the Reinsurance Treaty a secret agreement between Germany and Russia to remain neutral if either were attacked by France or Austria Hungary World empires and colonies c 1914 For Bismarck peace with Russia was the foundation of German foreign policy but in 1890 he was forced to retire by Wilhelm II The latter was persuaded not to renew the Reinsurance Treaty by his new Chancellor Leo von Caprivi This gave France an opening to agree to the Franco Russian Alliance in 1894 which was then followed by the 1904 Entente Cordiale with Britain The Triple Entente was completed by the 1907 Anglo Russian Convention While not formal alliances by settling longstanding colonial disputes in Asia and Africa British support for France or Russia in any future conflict became a possibility This was accentuated by British and Russian support for France against Germany during the 1911 Agadir Crisis Arms race SMS Rheinland a Nassau class battleship Germany s first response to the British Dreadnought 1910 German economic and industrial strength continued to expand rapidly post 1871 Backed by Wilhelm II Admiral Alfred von Tirpitz sought to use this growth to build an Imperial German Navy that could compete with the British Royal Navy This policy was based on the work of US naval author Alfred Thayer Mahan who argued that possession of a blue water navy was vital for global power projection Tirpitz had his books translated into German while Wilhelm made them required reading for his advisors and senior military personnel However it was also an emotional decision driven by Wilhelm s simultaneous admiration for the Royal Navy and desire to surpass it Bismarck thought that the British would not interfere in Europe as long as its maritime supremacy remained secure but his dismissal in 1890 led to a change in policy and an Anglo German naval arms race began Despite the vast sums spent by Tirpitz the launch of HMS Dreadnought in 1906 gave the British a technological advantage Ultimately the race diverted huge resources into creating a German navy large enough to antagonise Britain but not defeat it in 1911 Chancellor Theobald von Bethmann Hollweg acknowledged defeat leading to the Rustungswende or armaments turning point when he switched expenditure from the navy to the army This decision was not driven by a reduction in political tensions but by German concern over Russia s quick recovery from its defeat in the Russo Japanese War and subsequent 1905 Russian Revolution Economic reforms led to a significant post 1908 expansion of railways and transportation infrastructure particularly in its western border regions Since Germany and Austria Hungary relied on faster mobilisation to compensate for their numerical inferiority compared to Russia the threat posed by the closing of this gap was more important than competing with the Royal Navy After Germany expanded its standing army by 170 000 troops in 1913 France extended compulsory military service from two to three years similar measures were taken by the Balkan powers and Italy which led to increased expenditure by the Ottomans and Austria Hungary Absolute figures are difficult to calculate due to differences in categorising expenditure since they often omit civilian infrastructure projects like railways which had logistical importance and military use It is known however that from 1908 to 1913 military spending by the six major European powers increased by over 50 in real terms Conflicts in the Balkans Ethno linguistic map of Austria Hungary 1910 Bosnia Herzegovina was annexed in 1908 Sarajevo citizens reading a poster with the proclamation of the Austrian annexation in 1908 The years before 1914 were marked by a series of crises in the Balkans as other powers sought to benefit from the Ottoman decline While Pan Slavic and Orthodox Russia considered itself the protector of Serbia and other Slav states they preferred the strategically vital Bosporus straits to be controlled by a weak Ottoman government rather than an ambitious Slav power like Bulgaria Russia had ambitions in northeastern Anatolia while its clients had overlapping claims in the Balkans These competing interests divided Russian policy makers and added to regional instability Austrian statesmen viewed the Balkans as essential for the continued existence of their Empire and saw Serbian expansion as a direct threat The 1908 1909 Bosnian Crisis began when Austria annexed the former Ottoman territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina which it had occupied since 1878 Timed to coincide with the Bulgarian Declaration of Independence from the Ottoman Empire this unilateral action was denounced by the European powers but accepted as there was no consensus on how to resolve the situation Some historians see this as a significant escalation ending any chance of Austria cooperating with Russia in the Balkans while also damaging diplomatic relations between Serbia and Italy Tensions increased after the 1911 1912 Italo Turkish War demonstrated Ottoman weakness and led to the formation of the Balkan League an alliance of Serbia Bulgaria Montenegro and Greece The League quickly overran most of the Ottomans territory in the Balkans during the 1912 1913 First Balkan War much to the surprise of outside observers The Serbian capture of ports on the Adriatic resulted in partial Austrian mobilisation starting on 21 November 1912 including units along the Russian border in Galicia The Russian government decided not to mobilise in response unprepared to precipitate a war The Great Powers sought to re assert control through the 1913 Treaty of London which had created an independent Albania while enlarging the territories of Bulgaria Serbia Montenegro and Greece However disputes between the victors sparked the 33 day Second Balkan War when Bulgaria attacked Serbia and Greece on 16 June 1913 it was defeated losing most of Macedonia to Serbia and Greece and Southern Dobruja to Romania The result was that even countries which benefited from the Balkan Wars such as Serbia and Greece felt cheated of their rightful gains while for Austria it demonstrated the apparent indifference with which other powers viewed their concerns including Germany This complex mix of resentment nationalism and insecurity helps explain why the pre 1914 Balkans became known as the powder keg of Europe PreludeSarajevo assassination Traditionally thought to show the arrest of Gavrilo Princip right this photo is now believed by historians to depict an innocent bystander Ferdinand Behr on 28 June 1914 On 28 June 1914 Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria heir presumptive to Emperor Franz Joseph I of Austria visited Sarajevo the capital of the recently annexed Bosnia and Herzegovina Cvjetko Popovic Gavrilo Princip Nedeljko Cabrinovic Trifko Grabez Vaso Cubrilovic Bosnian Serbs and Muhamed Mehmedbasic from the Bosniaks community from the movement known as Young Bosnia took up positions along the Archduke s motorcade route to assassinate him Supplied with arms by extremists within the Serbian Black Hand intelligence organisation they hoped his death would free Bosnia from Austrian rule Cabrinovic threw a grenade at the Archduke s car and injured two of his aides The other assassins were also unsuccessful An hour later as Ferdinand was returning from visiting the injured officers in hospital his car took a wrong turn into a street where Gavrilo Princip was standing He fired two pistol shots fatally wounding Ferdinand and his wife Sophie According to historian Zbynek Zeman in Vienna the event almost failed to make any impression whatsoever On 28 and 29 June the crowds listened to music and drank wine as if nothing had happened Nevertheless the impact of the murder of the heir to the throne was significant and has been described by historian Christopher Clark as a 9 11 effect a terrorist event charged with historic meaning transforming the political chemistry in Vienna Expansion of violence in Bosnia and Herzegovina Crowds on the streets in the aftermath of the anti Serb riots in Sarajevo 29 June 1914 Austro Hungarian authorities encouraged subsequent anti Serb riots in Sarajevo Violent actions against ethnic Serbs were also organised outside Sarajevo in other cities in Austro Hungarian controlled Bosnia and Herzegovina Croatia and Slovenia Austro Hungarian authorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina imprisoned approximately 5 500 prominent Serbs 700 to 2 200 of whom died in prison A further 460 Serbs were sentenced to death A predominantly Bosniak special militia known as the Schutzkorps was established and carried out the persecution of Serbs July Crisis Cheering crowds in London and Paris on the day war was declared The assassination initiated the July Crisis a month of diplomatic manoeuvring between Austria Hungary Germany Russia France and Britain Believing that Serbian intelligence helped organise Franz Ferdinand s murder Austrian officials wanted to use the opportunity to end their interference in Bosnia and saw war as the best way of achieving this However the Foreign Ministry had no solid proof of Serbian involvement On 23 July Austria delivered an ultimatum to Serbia listing ten demands made intentionally unacceptable to provide an excuse for starting hostilities Serbia ordered general mobilisation on 25 July but accepted all the terms except for those empowering Austrian representatives to suppress subversive elements inside Serbia and take part in the investigation and trial of Serbians linked to the assassination Claiming this amounted to rejection Austria broke off diplomatic relations and ordered partial mobilisation the next day on 28 July they declared war on Serbia and began shelling Belgrade Russia ordered general mobilisation in support of Serbia on 30 July Anxious to ensure backing from the SPD political opposition by presenting Russia as the aggressor German Chancellor Bethmann Hollweg delayed the commencement of war preparations until 31 July That afternoon the Russian government were handed a note requiring them to cease all war measures against Germany and Austria Hungary within 12 hours A further German demand for neutrality was refused by the French who ordered but delayed declaring war The German General Staff had long assumed they faced a war on two fronts the Schlieffen Plan envisaged using 80 of the army to defeat France then switching to Russia Since this required them to move quickly mobilisation orders were issued that afternoon Once the German ultimatum to Russia expired on the morning of 1 August the two countries were at war At a meeting on 29 July the British cabinet had narrowly decided its obligations to Belgium under the 1839 Treaty of London did not require it to oppose a German invasion with military force however Prime Minister Asquith and his senior Cabinet ministers were already committed to supporting France the Royal Navy had been mobilised and public opinion was strongly in favour of intervention On 31 July Britain sent notes to Germany and France asking them to respect Belgian neutrality France pledged to do so but Germany did not reply Aware of German plans to attack through Belgium French Commander in Chief Joseph Joffre asked his government for permission to cross the border and pre empt such a move To avoid violating Belgian neutrality he was told any advance could come only after a German invasion Instead the French cabinet ordered its Army to withdraw 10 km behind the German frontier to avoid provoking war On 2 August Germany occupied Luxembourg and exchanged fire with French units when German patrols entered French territory on 3 August they declared war on France and demanded free passage across Belgium which was refused Early on the morning of 4 August the Germans invaded and Albert I of Belgium called for assistance under the Treaty of London Britain sent Germany an ultimatum demanding they withdraw from Belgium when this expired at midnight without a response the two empires were at war Progress of the warOpening hostilities Confusion among the Central Powers Germany promised to support Austria Hungary s invasion of Serbia but interpretations of what this meant differed Previously tested deployment plans had been replaced early in 1914 but those had never been tested in exercises Austro Hungarian leaders believed Germany would cover its northern flank against Russia Serbian campaign Serbian Army Bleriot XI Oluj 1915 Beginning on 12 August the Austrians and Serbs clashed at the battles of the Cer and Kolubara over the next two weeks Austrian attacks were repulsed with heavy losses As a result Austria had to keep sizeable forces on the Serbian front weakening their efforts against Russia Serbia s victory against Austria Hungary in the 1914 invasion has been called one of the major upset victories of the twentieth century In 1915 the campaign saw the first use of anti aircraft warfare after an Austrian plane was shot down with ground to air fire as well as the first medical evacuation by the Serbian army German offensive in Belgium and France German soldiers on the way to the front in 1914 at this stage all sides expected the conflict to be a short one Upon mobilisation in accordance with the Schlieffen Plan 80 of the German Army was located on the Western Front with the remainder acting as a screening force in the East Rather than a direct attack across their shared frontier the German right wing would sweep through the Netherlands and Belgium then swing south encircling Paris and trapping the French army against the Swiss border The plan s creator Alfred von Schlieffen head of the German General Staff from 1891 to 1906 estimated that this would take six weeks after which the German army would transfer to the East and defeat the Russians The plan was substantially modified by his successor Helmuth von Moltke the Younger Under Schlieffen 85 of German forces in the west were assigned to the right wing with the remainder holding along the frontier By keeping his left wing deliberately weak he hoped to lure the French into an offensive into the lost provinces of Alsace Lorraine which was the strategy envisaged by their Plan XVII However Moltke grew concerned that the French might push too hard on his left flank and as the German Army increased in size from 1908 to 1914 he changed the allocation of forces between the two wings to 70 30 He also considered Dutch neutrality essential for German trade and cancelled the incursion into the Netherlands which meant any delays in Belgium threatened the viability of the plan Historian Richard Holmes argues that these changes meant the right wing was not strong enough to achieve decisive success French bayonet charge during the Battle of the Frontiers by the end of August French casualties exceeded 260 000 including 75 000 dead The initial German advance in the West was very successful By the end of August the Allied left which included the British Expeditionary Force BEF was in full retreat and the French offensive in Alsace Lorraine was a disastrous failure with casualties exceeding 260 000 German planning provided broad strategic instructions while allowing army commanders considerable freedom in carrying them out at the front but von Kluck used this freedom to disobey orders opening a gap between the German armies as they closed on Paris The French army reinforced by the British expeditionary corps seized this opportunity to counter attack and pushed the German army 40 to 80 km back Both armies were then so exhausted that no decisive move could be implemented so they settled in trenches with the vain hope of breaking through as soon as they could build local superiority In 1911 the Russian Stavka agreed with the French to attack Germany within fifteen days of mobilisation ten days before the Germans had anticipated although it meant the two Russian armies that entered East Prussia on 17 August did so without many of their support elements By the end of 1914 German troops held strong defensive positions inside France controlled the bulk of France s domestic coalfields and inflicted 230 000 more casualties than it lost itself However communications problems and questionable command decisions cost Germany the chance of a decisive outcome while it had failed to achieve the primary objective of avoiding a long two front war As was apparent to several German leaders this amounted to a strategic defeat shortly after the First Battle of the Marne Crown Prince Wilhelm told an American reporter We have lost the war It will go on for a long time but lost it is already Asia and the Pacific Japanese soldiers occupy a captured German trench during the Siege of Tsingtao 1914 On 30 August 1914 New Zealand occupied German Samoa now Samoa On 11 September the Australian Naval and Military Expeditionary Force landed on the island of New Britain then part of German New Guinea On 28 October the German cruiser SMS Emden sank the Russian cruiser Zhemchug in the Battle of Penang Japan declared war on Germany before seizing territories in the Pacific which later became the South Seas Mandate as well as German Treaty ports on the Chinese Shandong peninsula at Tsingtao After Vienna refused to withdraw its cruiser SMS Kaiserin Elisabeth from Tsingtao Japan declared war on Austria Hungary and the ship was sunk in November 1914 Within a few months Allied forces had seized all German territories in the Pacific leaving only isolated commerce raiders and a few holdouts in New Guinea African campaigns British artillery in Kamerun 1915 Some of the first clashes of the war involved British French and German colonial forces in Africa On 6 7 August French and British troops invaded the German protectorates of Togoland and Kamerun On 10 August German forces in South West Africa attacked South Africa sporadic and fierce fighting continued for the rest of the war The German colonial forces in German East Africa led by Colonel Paul von Lettow Vorbeck fought a guerrilla warfare campaign and only surrendered two weeks after the armistice took effect in Europe Indian support for the Allies British Indian Army infantry divisions in France these troops were withdrawn in December 1915 and served in the Mesopotamian campaign Before the war Germany had attempted to use Indian nationalism and pan Islamism to its advantage a policy continued post 1914 by instigating uprisings in India while the Niedermayer Hentig Expedition urged Afghanistan to join the war on the side of Central Powers However contrary to British fears of a revolt in India the outbreak of the war saw a reduction in nationalist activity Leaders from the Indian National Congress and other groups believed support for the British war effort would hasten Indian Home Rule a promise allegedly made explicit in 1917 by Edwin Montagu the Secretary of State for India In 1914 the British Indian Army was larger than the British Army itself and between 1914 and 1918 an estimated 1 3 million Indian soldiers and labourers served in Europe Africa and the Middle East In all 140 000 soldiers served on the Western Front and nearly 700 000 in the Middle East with 47 746 killed and 65 126 wounded The suffering engendered by the war as well as the failure of the British government to grant self government to India afterward bred disillusionment resulting in the campaign for full independence led by Mahatma Gandhi Western Front Trench warfare begins British Indian soldiers digging trenches in Laventie France 1915 Pre war military tactics that had emphasised open warfare and individual riflemen proved obsolete when confronted with conditions prevailing in 1914 Technological advances allowed the creation of strong defensive systems largely impervious to massed infantry advances such as barbed wire machine guns and above all far more powerful artillery which dominated the battlefield and made crossing open ground extremely difficult Both sides struggled to develop tactics for breaching entrenched positions without heavy casualties In time technology enabled the production of new offensive weapons such as gas warfare and the tank After the First Battle of the Marne in September 1914 Allied and German forces unsuccessfully tried to outflank each other a series of manoeuvres later known as the Race to the Sea By the end of 1914 the opposing forces confronted each other along an uninterrupted line of entrenched positions from the Channel to the Swiss border Since the Germans were normally able to choose where to stand they generally held the high ground while their trenches tended to be better built those constructed by the French and English were initially considered temporary only needed until an offensive would destroy the German defences Both sides tried to break the stalemate using scientific and technological advances On 22 April 1915 at the Second Battle of Ypres the Germans violating the Hague Convention used chlorine gas for the first time on the Western Front Several types of gas soon became widely used by both sides and though it never proved a decisive battle winning weapon it became one of the most feared and best remembered horrors of the war Continuation of trench warfare German casualties at the Somme 1916 In February 1916 the Germans attacked French defensive positions at the Battle of Verdun lasting until December 1916 Casualties were greater for the French but the Germans bled heavily as well with anywhere from 700 000 to 975 000 casualties between the two combatants Verdun became a symbol of French determination and self sacrifice The Battle of the Somme was an Anglo French offensive from July to November 1916 The opening day on 1 July 1916 was the bloodiest single day in the history of the British Army which suffered 57 500 casualties including 19 200 dead As a whole the Somme offensive led to an estimated 420 000 British casualties along with 200 000 French and 500 000 Germans The diseases that emerged in the trenches were a major killer on both sides The living conditions led to disease and infection such as trench foot lice typhus trench fever and the Spanish flu Naval war Battleships of the Hochseeflotte 1917 At the start of the war German cruisers were scattered across the globe some of which were subsequently used to attack Allied merchant shipping These were systematically hunted down by the Royal Navy though not before causing considerable damage One of the most successful was the SMS Emden part of the German East Asia Squadron stationed at Qingdao which seized or sank 15 merchantmen a Russian cruiser and a French destroyer Most of the squadron was returning to Germany when it sank two British armoured cruisers at the Battle of Coronel in November 1914 before being virtually destroyed at the Battle of the Falkland Islands in December The SMS Dresden escaped with a few auxiliaries but after the Battle of Mas a Tierra these too were either destroyed or interned Soon after the outbreak of hostilities Britain began a naval blockade of Germany This proved effective in cutting off vital supplies though it violated accepted international law Britain also mined international waters which closed off entire sections of the ocean even to neutral ships Since there was limited response to this tactic Germany expected a similar response to its unrestricted submarine warfare The Battle of Jutland in May June 1916 was the only full scale clash of battleships during the war and one of the largest in history The clash was indecisive though the Germans inflicted more damage than they received thereafter the bulk of the German High Seas Fleet was confined to port U 155 exhibited near Tower Bridge in London after the 1918 Armistice German U boats attempted to cut the supply lines between North America and Britain The nature of submarine warfare meant that attacks often came without warning giving the crews of the merchant ships little hope of survival The United States launched a protest and Germany changed its rules of engagement After the sinking of the passenger ship RMS Lusitania in 1915 Germany promised not to target passenger liners while Britain armed its merchant ships placing them beyond the protection of the cruiser rules which demanded warning and movement of crews to a place of safety a standard that lifeboats did not meet Finally in early 1917 Germany adopted a policy of unrestricted submarine warfare realising the Americans would eventually enter the war Germany sought to strangle Allied sea lanes before the United States could transport a large army overseas but after initial successes eventually failed to do so The U boat threat lessened in 1917 when merchant ships began travelling in convoys escorted by destroyers This tactic made it difficult for U boats to find targets which significantly lessened losses after the hydrophone and depth charges were introduced destroyers could potentially successfully attack a submerged submarine Convoys slowed the flow of supplies since ships had to wait as convoys were assembled the solution was an extensive program of building new freighters Troopships were too fast for the submarines and did not travel the North Atlantic in convoys The U boats sunk more than 5 000 Allied ships at the cost of 199 submarines World War I also saw the first use of aircraft carriers in combat with HMS Furious launching Sopwith Camels in a successful raid against the Zeppelin hangars at Tondern in July 1918 as well as blimps for antisubmarine patrol Southern theatres War in the Balkans Refugee transport from Serbia in Leibnitz Styria 1914 Faced with Russia in the east Austria Hungary could spare only one third of its army to attack Serbia After suffering heavy losses the Austrians briefly occupied the Serbian capital Belgrade A Serbian counter attack in the Battle of Kolubara succeeded in driving them from the country by the end of 1914 For the first 10 months of 1915 Austria Hungary used most of its military reserves to fight Italy German and Austro Hungarian diplomats scored a coup by persuading Bulgaria to join the attack on Serbia The Austro Hungarian provinces of Slovenia Croatia and Bosnia provided troops for Austria Hungary Montenegro allied itself with Serbia Bulgarian soldiers in a trench preparing to fire against an incoming aeroplane Bulgaria declared war on Serbia on 14 October 1915 and joined in the attack by the Austro Hungarian army under Mackensen s army of 250 000 that was already underway Serbia was conquered in a little more than a month as the Central Powers now including Bulgaria sent in 600 000 troops in total The Serbian army fighting on two fronts and facing certain defeat retreated into northern Albania The Serbs suffered defeat in the Battle of Kosovo Montenegro covered the Serbian retreat toward the Adriatic coast in the Battle of Mojkovac on 6 7 January 1916 but ultimately the Austrians also conquered Montenegro The surviving Serbian soldiers were evacuated to Greece After the conquest Serbia was divided between Austro Hungary and Bulgaria In late 1915 a Franco British force landed at Salonica in Greece to offer assistance and to pressure its government to declare war against the Central Powers However the pro German King Constantine I dismissed the pro Allied government of Eleftherios Venizelos before the Allied expeditionary force arrived The Macedonian front was at first mostly static French and Serbian forces retook limited areas of Macedonia by recapturing Bitola on 19 November 1916 following the costly Monastir offensive which brought stabilisation of the front Austro Hungarian troops executing captured Serbians 1917 Serbia lost about 850 000 people during the war a quarter of its pre war population Serbian and French troops finally made a breakthrough in September 1918 in the Vardar offensive after most German and Austro Hungarian troops had been withdrawn The Bulgarians were defeated at the Battle of Dobro Pole and by 25 September British and French troops had crossed the border into Bulgaria proper as the Bulgarian army collapsed Bulgaria capitulated four days later on 29 September 1918 The German high command responded by despatching troops to hold the line but these forces were too weak to re establish a front The disappearance of the Macedonian front meant that the road to Budapest and Vienna was now opened to Allied forces Hindenburg and Ludendorff concluded that the strategic and operational balance had now shifted decidedly against the Central Powers and a day after the Bulgarian collapse insisted on an immediate peace settlement Ottoman Empire Australian troops charging near a Turkish trench during the Gallipoli campaign The Ottomans threatened Russia s Caucasian territories and Britain s communications with India via the Suez Canal The Ottoman Empire took advantage of the European powers preoccupation with the war and conducted large scale ethnic cleansing of the Armenian Greek and Assyrian Christian populations the Armenian genocide Greek genocide and Assyrian genocide respectively The British and French opened overseas fronts with the Gallipoli 1915 and Mesopotamian campaigns 1914 In Gallipoli the Ottoman Empire successfully repelled the British French and Australian and New Zealand Army Corps ANZACs In Mesopotamia by contrast after the defeat of the British defenders in the siege of Kut by the Ottomans 1915 1916 British Imperial forces reorganised and captured Baghdad in March 1917 The British were aided in Mesopotamia by local Arab and Assyrian fighters while the Ottomans employed local Kurdish and Turcoman tribes The Suez Canal was defended from Ottoman attacks in 1915 and 1916 in August 1916 a German and Ottoman force was defeated at the Battle of Romani by the ANZAC Mounted Division and the 52nd Lowland Infantry Division Following this victory an Egyptian Expeditionary Force advanced across the Sinai Peninsula pushing Ottoman forces back in the Battle of Magdhaba in December and the Battle of Rafa on the border between the Egyptian Sinai and Ottoman Palestine in January 1917 Russian forest trench at the Battle of Sarikamish 1914 1915 Russian armies generally had success in the Caucasus campaign Enver Pasha supreme commander of the Ottoman armed forces dreamed of re conquering central Asia and areas that had been previously lost to Russia He was however a poor commander He launched an offensive against the Russians in the Caucasus in December 1914 with 100 000 troops insisting on a frontal attack against mountainous Russian positions in winter He lost 86 of his force at the Battle of Sarikamish General Yudenich the Russian commander from 1915 to 1916 drove the Turks out of most of the southern Caucasus Kaiser Wilhelm II and Prince Leopold of Bavaria inspecting Turkish troops of the 15th Corps in East Galicia Austria Hungary now Poland The Ottoman Empire with German support invaded Persia modern Iran in December 1914 to cut off British and Russian access to petroleum reservoirs around Baku Persia ostensibly neutral had long been under British and Russian influence The Ottomans and Germans were aided by Kurdish and Azeri forces together with a large number of major Iranian tribes while the Russians and British had the support of Armenian and Assyrian forces The Persian campaign lasted until 1918 and ended in failure for the Ottomans and their allies However the Russian withdrawal from the war in 1917 led Armenian and Assyrian forces to be cut off from supply lines outnumbered outgunned and isolated forcing them to fight and flee towards British lines in northern Mesopotamia The Arab Revolt instigated by the British Foreign Office started in June 1916 with the Battle of Mecca led by Sharif Hussein The Sharif declared the independence of the Kingdom of Hejaz and with British assistance conquered much of Ottoman held Arabia resulting finally in the Ottoman surrender of Damascus Fakhri Pasha the Ottoman commander of Medina resisted for more than 2 1 2 years during the siege of Medina before surrendering in January 1919 The Senussi tribe along the border of Italian Libya and British Egypt incited and armed by the Turks waged a small scale guerrilla war against Allied troops The British were forced to dispatch 12 000 troops to oppose them in the Senussi campaign Their rebellion was finally crushed in mid 1916 Total Allied casualties on the Ottoman fronts amounted to 650 000 men Total Ottoman casualties were 725 000 with 325 000 dead and 400 000 wounded Italian Front Isonzo Offensives 1915 1917 Though Italy joined the Triple Alliance in 1882 a treaty with its traditional Austrian enemy was so controversial that subsequent governments denied its existence and the terms were only made public in 1915 This arose from nationalist designs on Austro Hungarian territory in Trentino the Austrian Littoral Rijeka and Dalmatia considered vital to secure the borders established in 1866 In 1902 Rome secretly had agreed with France to remain neutral if the latter was attacked by Germany effectively nullifying its role in the Triple Alliance When the war began in 1914 Italy argued the Triple Alliance was defensive and it was not obliged to support an Austrian attack on Serbia Opposition to joining the Central Powers increased when Turkey became a member in September since in 1911 Italy had occupied Ottoman possessions in Libya and the Dodecanese islands To secure Italian neutrality the Central Powers offered them Tunisia while in return for an immediate entry into the war the Allies agreed to their demands for Austrian territory and sovereignty over the Dodecanese Although they remained secret these provisions were incorporated into the April 1915 Treaty of London Italy joined the Triple Entente and on 23 May declared war on Austria Hungary followed by Germany fifteen months later Austro Hungarian trench at 3 850 metres in the Ortler Alps one of the most challenging fronts of the war The pre 1914 Italian army was short of officers trained men adequate transport and modern weapons by April 1915 some of these deficiencies had been remedied but it was still unprepared for the major offensive required by the Treaty of London The advantage of superior numbers was offset by the difficult terrain much of the fighting took place high in the Alps and Dolomites where trench lines had to be cut through rock and ice and keeping troops supplied was a major challenge These issues were exacerbated by unimaginative strategies and tactics Between 1915 and 1917 the Italian commander Luigi Cadorna undertook a series of frontal assaults along the Isonzo which made little progress and cost many lives by the end of the war Italian combat deaths totalled around 548 000 In the spring of 1916 the Austro Hungarians counterattacked in Asiago in the Strafexpedition but made little progress and were pushed by the Italians back to Tyrol Although Italy occupied southern Albania in May 1916 their main focus was the Isonzo front which after the capture of Gorizia in August 1916 remained static until October 1917 After a combined Austro German force won a major victory at Caporetto Cadorna was replaced by Armando Diaz who retreated more than 100 kilometres 62 mi before holding positions along the Piave River A second Austrian offensive was repulsed in June 1918 On 24 October Diaz launched the Battle of Vittorio Veneto and initially met stubborn resistance but with Austria Hungary collapsing Hungarian divisions in Italy demanded they be sent home When this was granted many others followed and the Imperial army disintegrated the Italians taking over 300 000 prisoners On 3 November the Armistice of Villa Giusti ended hostilities between Austria Hungary and Italy which occupied Trieste and areas along the Adriatic Sea awarded to it in 1915 Eastern Front Initial actions Tsar Nicholas II and Grand Duke Nikolaevich following the Russian capture of Przemysl the longest siege of the war As previously agreed with French president Raymond Poincare Russian plans at the start of the war were to simultaneously advance into Austrian Galicia and East Prussia as soon as possible Although their attack on Galicia was largely successful and the invasions achieved their aim of forcing Germany to divert troops from the Western Front the speed of mobilisation meant they did so without much of their heavy equipment and support functions These weaknesses contributed to Russian defeats at Tannenberg and the Masurian Lakes in August and September 1914 forcing them to withdraw from East Prussia with heavy losses By spring 1915 they had also retreated from Galicia and the May 1915 Gorlice Tarnow offensive allowed the Central Powers to invade Russian occupied Poland Despite the successful June 1916 Brusilov offensive against the Austrians in eastern Galicia shortages of supplies heavy losses and command failures prevented the Russians from fully exploiting their victory However it was one of the most significant offensives of the war diverting German resources from Verdun relieving Austro Hungarian pressure on the Italians and convincing Romania to enter the war on the side of the Allies on 27 August It also fatally weakened both the Austrian and Russian armies whose offensive capabilities were badly affected by their losses and increased disillusion with the war that ultimately led to the Russian revolutions Meanwhile unrest grew in Russia as Tsar Nicholas II remained at the front with the home front controlled by Empress Alexandra Her increasingly incompetent rule and food shortages in urban areas led to widespread protests and the murder of her favourite Grigori Rasputin at the end of 1916 Romanian participation BucharestTimișoara Banat Cluj Transylvania Chișinău Moldova Constanța Dobruja BulgariaHungaryMărășeștiOituzclass notpageimage Romania key locations 1916 1918 using 2025 borders Despite secretly agreeing to support the Triple Alliance in 1883 Romania increasingly found itself at odds with the Central Powers over their support for Bulgaria in the Balkan Wars and the status of ethnic Romanian communities in Hungarian controlled Transylvania which comprised an estimated 2 8 million of the 5 0 million population With the ruling elite split into pro German and pro Entente factions Romania remained neutral for two years while allowing Germany and Austria to transport military supplies and advisors across Romanian territory In September 1914 Russia acknowledged Romanian rights to Austro Hungarian territories including Transylvania and Banat whose acquisition had widespread popular support and Russian success against Austria led Romania to join the Entente in the August 1916 Treaty of Bucharest Under the strategic plan known as Hypothesis Z the Romanian army planned an offensive into Transylvania while defending Southern Dobruja and Giurgiu against a possible Bulgarian counterattack On 27 August 1916 they attacked Transylvania and occupied substantial parts of the province before being driven back by the recently formed German 9th Army led by former Chief of Staff Erich von Falkenhayn A combined German Bulgarian Turkish offensive captured Dobruja and Giurgiu although the bulk of the Romanian army managed to escape encirclement and retreated to Bucharest which surrendered to the Central Powers on 6 December 1916 In the summer of 1917 a Central Powers offensive began in Romania under the command of August von Mackensen to knock Romania out of the war resulting in the battles of Oituz Mărăști and Mărășești where up to 1 000 000 Central Powers troops were present The battles lasted from 22 July to 3 September and eventually the Romanian army was victorious advancing 500 km2 August von Mackensen could not plan for another offensive as he had to transfer troops to the Italian Front Following the Russian revolution Romania found itself alone on the Eastern Front and signed the Treaty of Bucharest with the Central Powers which recognised Romanian sovereignty over Bessarabia in return for ceding control of passes in the Carpathian Mountains to Austria Hungary and leasing its oil wells to Germany Although approved by Parliament King Ferdinand I refused to sign it hoping for an Allied victory in the west Romania re entered the war on 10 November 1918 on the side of the Allies and the Treaty of Bucharest was formally annulled by the Armistice of 11 November 1918 Central Powers peace overtures On 12 December 1916 after ten brutal months of the Battle of Verdun and a successful offensive against Romania Germany attempted to negotiate a peace with the Allies However this attempt was rejected out of hand as a duplicitous war ruse They shall not pass a phrase typically associated with the defence of Verdun US president Woodrow Wilson attempted to intervene as a peacemaker asking for both sides to state their demands Lloyd George s War Cabinet considered the German offer to be a ploy to create divisions among the Allies After initial outrage and much deliberation they took Wilson s note as a separate effort signalling that the US was on the verge of entering the war against Germany following the submarine outrages While the Allies debated a response to Wilson s offer the Germans chose to rebuff it in favour of a direct exchange of views Learning of the German response the Allied governments were free to make clear demands in their response of 14 January They sought restoration of damages the evacuation of occupied territories reparations for France Russia and Romania and a recognition of the principle of nationalities The Allies sought guarantees that would prevent or limit future wars The negotiations failed and the Entente powers rejected the German offer on the grounds of honour and noted Germany had not put forward any specific proposals Final years of the war Russian Revolution and withdrawal Territory lost by Russia under the 1918 Treaty of Brest Litovsk By the end of 1916 Russian casualties totalled nearly five million killed wounded or captured with major urban areas affected by food shortages and high prices In March 1917 Tsar Nicholas ordered the military to forcibly suppress strikes in Petrograd but the troops refused to fire on the crowds Revolutionaries set up the Petrograd Soviet and fearing a left wing takeover the State Duma forced Nicholas to abdicate and established the Russian Provisional Government which confirmed Russia s willingness to continue the war However the Petrograd Soviet refused to disband creating competing power centres and causing confusion and chaos with frontline soldiers becoming increasingly demoralised Following the tsar s abdication Vladimir Lenin with the help of the German government was ushered from Switzerland into Russia on 16 April 1917 Discontent and the weaknesses of the Provisional Government led to a rise in the popularity of the Bolshevik Party led by Lenin which demanded an immediate end to the war The Revolution of November was followed in December by an armistice and negotiations with Germany At first the Bolsheviks refused the German terms but when German troops began marching across Ukraine unopposed they acceded to the Treaty of Brest Litovsk on 3 March 1918 The treaty ceded vast territories including Finland Estonia Latvia Lithuania and parts of Poland and Ukraine to the Central Powers With the Russian Empire out of the war Romania found itself alone on the Eastern Front and signed the Treaty of Bucharest with the Central Powers in May 1918 Under the terms of the treaty Romania ceded territory to Austria Hungary and Bulgaria and leased its oil reserves to Germany However the terms also included the Central Powers recognition of the union of Bessarabia with Romania United States enters the war President Wilson asking Congress to declare war on Germany 2 April 1917 The United States was a major supplier of war material to the Allies but remained neutral in 1914 in large part due to domestic opposition The most significant factor in creating the support Wilson needed was the German submarine offensive which not only cost American lives but paralysed trade as ships were reluctant to put to sea On 6 April 1917 Congress declared war on Germany as an Associated Power of the Allies The US Navy sent a battleship group to Scapa Flow to join the Grand Fleet and provided convoy escorts In April 1917 the US Army had fewer than 300 000 men including National Guard units compared to British and French armies of 4 1 and 8 3 million respectively The Selective Service Act of 1917 drafted 2 8 million men though training and equipping such numbers was a huge logistical challenge By June 1918 over 667 000 members of the American Expeditionary Forces AEF were transported to France a figure which reached 2 million by the end of November Despite his conviction that Germany must be defeated Wilson went to war to ensure the US played a leading role in shaping the peace which meant preserving the AEF as a separate military force rather than being absorbed into British or French units as his Allies wanted He was strongly supported by AEF commander General John J Pershing a proponent of pre 1914 open warfare who considered the French and British emphasis on artillery misguided and incompatible with American offensive spirit Much to the frustration of his Allies who had suffered heavy losses in 1917 he insisted on retaining control of American troops and refused to commit them to the front line until able to operate as independent units As a result the first significant US involvement was the Meuse Argonne offensive in late September 1918 Nivelle Offensive April May 1917 Canadian Corps troops at the Battle of Vimy Ridge 1917 In December 1916 Robert Nivelle replaced Petain as commander of French armies on the Western Front and began planning a spring attack in Champagne part of a joint Franco British operation Poor security meant German intelligence was well informed on tactics and timetables but despite this when the attack began on 16 April the French made substantial gains before being brought to a halt by the newly built and extremely strong defences of the Hindenburg Line Nivelle persisted with frontal assaults and by 25 April the French had suffered nearly 135 000 casualties including 30 000 dead most incurred in the first two days Concurrent British attacks at Arras were more successful though ultimately of little strategic value Operating as a separate unit for the first time the Canadian Corps capture of Vimy Ridge is viewed by many Canadians as a defining moment in creating a sense of national identity Though Nivelle continued the offensive on 3 May the 21st Division which had been involved in some of the heaviest fighting at Verdun refused orders to go into battle initiating the French Army mutinies within days collective indiscipline had spread to 54 divisions while over 20 000 deserted Sinai and Palestine campaign 1917 1918 British artillery battery on Mount Scopus in the Battle of Jerusalem 1917 In March and April 1917 at the First and Second Battles of Gaza German and Ottoman forces stopped the advance of the Egyptian Expeditionary Force which had begun in August 1916 at the Battle of Romani At the end of October 1917 the Sinai and Palestine campaign resumed when General Edmund Allenby s XXth Corps XXI Corps and Desert Mounted Corps won the Battle of Beersheba Two Ottoman armies were defeated a few weeks later at the Battle of Mughar Ridge and early in December Jerusalem had been captured following another Ottoman defeat at the Battle of Jerusalem About this time Friedrich Freiherr Kress von Kressenstein was relieved of his duties as the Eighth Army s commander replaced by Djevad Pasha and a few months later the commander of the Ottoman Army in Palestine Erich von Falkenhayn was replaced by Otto Liman von Sanders In early 1918 the front line was extended and the Jordan Valley was occupied following the First Transjordan and the Second Transjordan attacks by British Empire forces in March and April 1918 German offensive and Allied counter offensive March November 1918 Between April and November 1918 the Allies increased their front line rifle strength while German strength fell by half In December 1917 the Central Powers signed an armistice with Russia thus freeing large numbers of German troops for use in the West With German reinforcements and new American troops pouring in the outcome was to be decided on the Western Front The Central Powers knew that they could not win a protracted war but they held high hopes for success in a final quick offensive Ludendorff drew up plans Operation Michael for the 1918 offensive on the Western Front The operation commenced on 21 March 1918 with an attack on British forces near Saint Quentin German forces achieved an unprecedented advance of 60 kilometres 37 mi The initial offensive was a success after heavy fighting however the offensive was halted Lacking tanks or motorised artillery the Germans were unable to consolidate their gains The problems of re supply were also exacerbated by increasing distances that now stretched over terrain that was shell torn and often impassable to traffic Germany launched Operation Georgette against the northern English Channel ports The Allies halted the drive after limited territorial gains by Germany The German Army to the south then conducted Operations Blucher and Yorck pushing broadly towards Paris Germany launched Operation Marne Second Battle of the Marne on 15 July in an attempt to encircle Reims The resulting counter attack which started the Hundred Days Offensive on 8 August led to a marked collapse in German morale Allied advance to the Hindenburg Line American soldiers firing on German entrenched positions during the Meuse Argonne offensive 1918 By September the Germans had fallen back to the Hindenburg Line The Allies had advanced to the Hindenburg Line in the north and centre German forces launched numerous counterattacks but positions and outposts of the Line continued falling with the BEF alone taking 30 441 prisoners in the last week of September On 24 September the Supreme Army Command informed the leaders in Berlin that armistice talks were inevitable The final assault on the Hindenburg Line began with the Meuse Argonne offensive launched by American and French troops on 26 September Two days later the Belgians French and British attacked around Ypres and the day after the British at St Quentin in the centre of the line The following week cooperating American and French units broke through in Champagne at the Battle of Blanc Mont Ridge 3 27 October forcing the Germans off the commanding heights and closing towards the Belgian frontier On 8 October the Hindenburg Line was pierced by British and Dominion troops of the First and Third British Armies at the Second Battle of Cambrai Breakthrough of Macedonian front September 1918 Bulgarian major Ivanov with white flag surrendering to Serbian 7th Danube regiment near Kumanovo Allied forces started the Vardar offensive on 15 September at two key points Dobro Pole and near Dojran Lake In the Battle of Dobro Pole the Serbian and French armies had success after a three day long battle with relatively small casualties and subsequently made a breakthrough in the front something which was rarely seen in World War I After the front was broken Allied forces started to liberate Serbia and reached Skopje at 29 September after which Bulgaria signed an armistice with the Allies on 30 September Armistices and capitulations Italian troops reach Trento during the Battle of Vittorio Veneto 1918 The collapse of the Central Powers came swiftly Bulgaria was the first to sign an armistice the Armistice of Salonica on 29 September 1918 Wilhelm II in a telegram to Tsar Ferdinand I of Bulgaria described the situation thus Disgraceful 62 000 Serbs decided the war On the same day the German Supreme Army Command informed Wilhelm II and the Imperial Chancellor Count Georg von Hertling that the military situation facing Germany was hopeless On 24 October the Italians began a push that rapidly recovered territory lost after the Battle of Caporetto This culminated in the Battle of Vittorio Veneto marking the end of the Austro Hungarian Army as an effective fighting force The offensive also triggered the disintegration of the Austro Hungarian Empire During the last week of October declarations of independence were made in Budapest Prague and Zagreb On 29 October the imperial authorities asked Italy for an armistice but the Italians continued advancing reaching Trento Udine and Trieste On 3 November Austria Hungary sent a flag of truce and accepted the Armistice of Villa Giusti arranged with the Allied Authorities in Paris Austria and Hungary signed separate armistices following the overthrow of the Habsburg monarchy In the following days the Italian Army occupied Innsbruck and all Tyrol with over 20 000 soldiers On 30 October the Ottoman Empire capitulated and signed the Armistice of Mudros German government surrenders Ferdinand Foch second from right pictured outside the carriage in Compiegne after agreeing to the armistice that ended the war there With the military faltering and with widespread loss of confidence in the kaiser Germany moved towards surrender Prince Maximilian of Baden took charge on 3 October as Chancellor of Germany Negotiations with President Wilson began immediately in the hope that he would offer better terms than the British and French Wilson demanded a constitutional monarchy and parliamentary control over the German military The German Revolution of 1918 1919 began at the end of October 1918 Units of the German Navy refused to set sail for a large scale operation in a war they believed to be as good as lost The sailors revolt which then ensued in the naval ports of Wilhelmshaven and Kiel spread across the whole country within days and led to the proclamation of a republic on 9 November 1918 shortly thereafter to the abdication of Wilhelm II and German surrender AftermathIn the aftermath of the war the German Austro Hungarian Ottoman and Russian empires disappeared Numerous nations regained their former independence and new ones were created Four dynasties fell as a result of the war the Romanovs the Hohenzollerns the Habsburgs and the Ottomans Belgium and Serbia were badly damaged as was France with 1 4 million soldiers dead not counting other casualties Germany and Russia were similarly affected Formal end of the war The signing of the Treaty of Versailles in the Hall of Mirrors Versailles 28 June 1919 by Sir William Orpen A formal state of war between the two sides persisted for another seven months until the signing of the Treaty of Versailles with Germany on 28 June 1919 The US Senate did not ratify the treaty despite public support for it and did not formally end its involvement in the war until the Knox Porter Resolution was signed on 2 July 1921 by President Warren G Harding For the British Empire the state of war ceased under the provisions of the Termination of the Present War Definition Act 1918 concerning Germany on 10 January 1920 Austria on 16 July 1920 Bulgaria on 9 August 1920 Hungary on 26 July 1921 Turkey on 6 August 1924 Greek prime minister Eleftherios Venizelos signing the Treaty of Sevres Some war memorials date the end of the war as being when the Versailles Treaty was signed in 1919 which was when many of the troops serving abroad finally returned home by contrast most commemorations of the war s end concentrate on the armistice of 11 November 1918 Peace treaties and national boundaries Map of territorial changes in Europe after World War I as of 1923 The Paris Peace Conference imposed a series of peace treaties on the Central Powers officially ending the war The 1919 Treaty of Versailles dealt with Germany and building on Wilson s 14th point established the League of Nations on 28 June 1919 The Central Powers had to acknowledge responsibility for all the loss and damage to which the Allied and Associated Governments and their nationals have been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by their aggression In the Treaty of Versailles this statement was Article 231 This article became known as the War Guilt Clause as the majority of Germans felt humiliated and resentful The Germans felt they had been unjustly dealt with by what they called the diktat of Versailles German historian Hagen Schulze said the Treaty placed Germany under legal sanctions deprived of military power economically ruined and politically humiliated Belgian historian Laurence Van Ypersele emphasises the central role played by memory of the war and the Versailles Treaty in German politics in the 1920s and 1930s Active denial of war guilt in Germany and German resentment at both reparations and continued Allied occupation of the Rhineland made widespread revision of the meaning and memory of the war problematic The legend of the stab in the back and the wish to revise the Versailles diktat and the belief in an international threat aimed at the elimination of the German nation persisted at the heart of German politics Even a man of peace such as Gustav Stresemann publicly rejected German guilt As for the Nazis they waved the banners of domestic treason and international conspiracy in an attempt to galvanise the German nation into a spirit of revenge Like a Fascist Italy Nazi Germany sought to redirect the memory of the war to the benefit of its policies Meanwhile new nations liberated from German rule viewed the treaty as a recognition of wrongs committed against small nations by much larger aggressive neighbours Dissolution of Austria Hungary after war Austria Hungary was partitioned into several successor states largely but not entirely along ethnic lines Apart from Austria and Hungary Czechoslovakia Italy Poland Romania and Yugoslavia received territories from the Dual Monarchy the formerly separate and autonomous Kingdom of Croatia Slavonia was incorporated into Yugoslavia The details were contained in the treaties of Saint Germain en Laye and Trianon As a result Hungary lost 64 of its total population decreasing from 20 9 million to 7 6 million and losing 31 3 3 out of 10 7 million of its ethnic Hungarians According to the 1910 census speakers of the Hungarian language included approximately 54 of the entire population of the Kingdom of Hungary Within the country numerous ethnic minorities were present 16 1 Romanians 10 5 Slovaks 10 4 Germans 2 5 Ruthenians 2 5 Serbs and 8 others Between 1920 and 1924 354 000 Hungarians fled former Hungarian territories attached to Romania Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia The Russian Empire lost much of its western frontier as the newly independent nations of Estonia Finland Latvia Lithuania and Poland were carved from it Romania took control of Bessarabia in April 1918 National identities After 123 years Poland re emerged as an independent country The Kingdom of Serbia and its dynasty as a minor Entente nation and the country with the most casualties per capita became the backbone of a new multinational state the Kingdom of Serbs Croats and Slovenes later renamed Yugoslavia Czechoslovakia combining the Kingdom of Bohemia with parts of the Kingdom of Hungary became a new nation Romania would unite all Romanian speaking people under a single state leading to Greater Romania In Australia and New Zealand the Battle of Gallipoli became known as those nations Baptism of Fire It was the first major war in which the newly established countries fought and it was one of the first times that Australian troops fought as Australians not just subjects of the British Crown and independent national identities for these nations took hold Anzac Day named after the Australian and New Zealand Army Corps ANZAC commemorates this defining moment In the aftermath of World War I Greece fought against Turkish nationalists led by Mustafa Kemal a war that eventually resulted in a massive population exchange between the two countries under the Treaty of Lausanne According to various sources several hundred thousand Greeks died during this period which was tied in with the Greek genocide CasualtiesMen transporting a wounded Ottoman soldier at Sirkeci The total number of military and civilian casualties in World War I was about 40 million estimates range from around 15 to 22 million deaths and about 23 million wounded military personnel ranking it among the deadliest conflicts in human history The total number of deaths includes between 9 and 11 million military personnel with an estimated civilian death toll of about 6 to 13 million Of the 60 million European military personnel who were mobilised from 1914 to 1918 an estimated 8 million were killed 7 million were permanently disabled and 15 million were seriously injured Germany lost 15 1 of its active male population Austria Hungary lost 17 1 and France lost 10 5 France mobilised 7 8 million men of which 1 4 million died and 3 2 million were injured Approximately 15 000 deployed men sustained gruesome facial injuries causing social stigma and marginalisation they were called the gueules cassees broken faces In Germany civilian deaths were 474 000 higher than in peacetime due in large part to food shortages and malnutrition that had weakened disease resistance These excess deaths are estimated as 271 000 in 1918 plus another 71 000 in the first half of 1919 when the blockade was still in effect Starvation caused by famine killed approximately 100 000 people in Lebanon Emergency military hospital during the Spanish flu pandemic in Camp Funston Kansas 1918 Diseases flourished in the chaotic wartime conditions In 1914 alone louse borne epidemic typhus killed 200 000 in Serbia Starting in early 1918 a major influenza epidemic known as Spanish flu spread across the world accelerated by the movement of large numbers of soldiers often crammed together in camps and transport ships with poor sanitation The Spanish flu killed at least 17 to 25 million people including an estimated 2 64 million Europeans and as many as 675 000 Americans Between 1915 and 1926 an epidemic of encephalitis lethargica affected nearly 5 million people worldwide Eight million equines mostly horses donkeys and mules died three quarters of them from the extreme conditions they worked in War crimes Chemical weapons in warfare French soldiers making a gas and flame attack on German trenches in Flanders The German army was the first to successfully deploy chemical weapons during the Second Battle of Ypres April May 1915 after German scientists under the direction of Fritz Haber at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute developed a method to weaponise chlorine The use of chemical weapons had been sanctioned by the German High Command to force Allied soldiers out of their entrenched positions complementing rather than supplanting more lethal conventional weapons Chemical weapons were deployed by all major belligerents throughout the war inflicting approximately 1 3 million casualties of which about 90 000 were fatal The use of chemical weapons in warfare was a direct violation of the 1899 Hague Declaration Concerning Asphyxiating Gases and the 1907 Hague Convention on Land Warfare which prohibited their use Genocides by the Ottoman Empire Armenians killed during the Armenian genocide Image taken from Ambassador Morgenthau s Story written by Henry Morgenthau Sr and published in 1918 The ethnic cleansing of the Ottoman Empire s Armenian population including mass deportations and executions during the final years of the Ottoman Empire is considered genocide The Ottomans carried out organised and systematic massacres of the Armenian population at the beginning of the war and manipulated acts of Armenian resistance by portraying them as rebellions to justify further extermination In early 1915 several Armenians volunteered to join the Russian forces and the Ottoman government used this as a pretext to issue the Tehcir Law Law on Deportation which authorised the deportation of Armenians from the Empire s eastern provinces to Syria between 1915 and 1918 The Armenians were intentionally marched to death and a number were attacked by Ottoman brigands While the exact number of deaths is unknown the International Association of Genocide Scholars estimates around 1 5 million The government of Turkey continues to deny the genocide to the present day arguing that those who died were victims of inter ethnic fighting famine or disease during World War I these claims are rejected by most historians Other ethnic groups were similarly attacked by the Ottoman Empire during this period including Assyrians and Greeks and some scholars consider those events to be part of the same policy of extermination At least 250 000 Assyrian Christians about half of the population and 350 000 750 000 Anatolian and Pontic Greeks were killed between 1915 and 1922 Prisoners of war British prisoners guarded by Ottoman forces after the First Battle of Gaza in 1917 About 8 million soldiers surrendered and were held in POW camps during the war All nations pledged to follow the Hague Conventions on fair treatment of prisoners of war and the survival rate for POWs was generally much higher than that of combatants at the front Around 25 31 of Russian losses as a proportion of those captured wounded or killed were to prisoner status for Austria Hungary 32 for Italy 26 for France 12 for Germany 9 for Britain 7 Prisoners from the Allied armies totalled about 1 4 million not including Russia which lost 2 5 3 5 million soldiers as prisoners From the Central Powers about 3 3 million soldiers became prisoners most of them surrendered to Russians Soldiers experiencesAllied personnel was around 42 928 000 while Central personnel was near 25 248 000 British soldiers of the war were initially volunteers but were increasingly conscripted Surviving veterans returning home often found they could discuss their experiences only among themselves so formed veterans associations or Legions Conscription U S Army recruiting poster with Uncle Sam 1917 Conscription was common in most European countries However it was controversial in English speaking countries It was especially unpopular among minority ethnicities especially the Irish Catholics in Ireland Australia and the French Catholics in Canada In the US conscription began in 1917 and was generally well received with a few pockets of opposition in isolated rural areas The administration decided to rely primarily on conscription rather than voluntary enlistment to raise military manpower after only 73 000 volunteers enlisted out of the initial 1 million target in the first six weeks of war Military attaches and war correspondents Military and civilian observers from every major power closely followed the course of the war Many were able to report on events from a perspective somewhat akin to modern embedded positions within the opposing land and naval forces Economic effectsMacro and micro economic consequences devolved from the war Families were altered by the departure of many men With the death or absence of the primary wage earner women were forced into the workforce in unprecedented numbers At the same time the industry needed to replace the lost labourers sent to war This aided the struggle for voting rights for women Poster showing women workers 1915 In all nations the government s share of GDP increased surpassing 50 in both Germany and France and nearly reaching that level in Britain To pay for purchases in the US Britain cashed in its extensive investments in American railroads and then began borrowing heavily from Wall Street President Wilson was on the verge of cutting off the loans in late 1916 but allowed a great increase in US government lending to the Allies After 1919 the US demanded repayment of these loans The repayments were in part funded by German reparations that in turn were supported by American loans to Germany This circular system collapsed in 1931 and some loans were never repaid Britain still owed the United States 4 4 billion of World War I debt in 1934 the last installment was finally paid in 2015 Britain turned to her colonies for help in obtaining essential war materials whose supply from traditional sources had become difficult Geologists such as Albert Kitson were called on to find new resources of precious minerals in the African colonies Kitson discovered important new deposits of manganese used in munitions production in the Gold Coast Article 231 of the Treaty of Versailles the so called war guilt clause stated Germany accepted responsibility for all the loss and damage to which the Allied and Associated Governments and their nationals have been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by the aggression of Germany and her allies It was worded as such to lay a legal basis for reparations and a similar clause was inserted in the treaties with Austria and Hungary However neither of them interpreted it as an admission of war guilt In 1921 the total reparation sum was placed at 132 billion gold marks However Allied experts knew that Germany could not pay this sum The total sum was divided into three categories with the third being deliberately designed to be chimerical and its primary function was to mislead public opinion into believing the total sum was being maintained Thus 50 billion gold marks 12 5 billion dollars represented the actual Allied assessment of German capacity to pay and therefore represented the total German reparations figure that had to be paid This figure could be paid in cash or in kind coal timber chemical dyes etc Some of the territory lost via the Treaty of Versailles was credited towards the reparation figure as were other acts such as helping to restore the Library of Louvain By 1929 the Great Depression caused political chaos throughout the world In 1932 the payment of reparations was suspended by the international community by which point Germany had paid only the equivalent of 20 598 billion gold marks With the rise of Adolf Hitler all bonds and loans that had been issued and taken out during the 1920s and early 1930s were cancelled David Andelman notes Refusing to pay doesn t make an agreement null and void The bonds the agreement still exist Thus following the Second World War at the London Conference in 1953 Germany agreed to resume payment on the money borrowed On 3 October 2010 Germany made the final payment on these bonds The Australian prime minister Billy Hughes wrote to the British prime minister David Lloyd George You have assured us that you cannot get better terms I much regret it and hope even now that some way may be found of securing agreement for demanding reparation commensurate with the tremendous sacrifices made by the British Empire and her Allies Australia received 5 571 720 in war reparations but the direct cost of the war to Australia had been 376 993 052 and by the mid 1930s repatriation pensions war gratuities interest and sinking fund charges were 831 280 947 Support and opposition for the warSupport Poster urging women to join the British war effort published by the Young Women s Christian Association 1915 In the Balkans Yugoslav nationalists such as the leader Ante Trumbic strongly supported the war desiring the freedom of Yugoslavs from Austria Hungary and other foreign powers and the creation of an independent Yugoslavia The Yugoslav Committee led by Trumbic was formed in Paris on 30 April 1915 but shortly moved its office to London In April 1918 the Rome Congress of Oppressed Nationalities met including Czechoslovak Italian Polish Transylvanian and Yugoslav representatives who urged the Allies to support national self determination for the peoples residing within Austria Hungary In the Middle East Arab nationalism soared in Ottoman territories in response to the rise of Turkish nationalism during the war with Arab nationalist leaders advocating the creation of a pan Arab state In 1916 the Arab Revolt began in Ottoman controlled territories of the Middle East to achieve independence In East Africa Iyasu V of Ethiopia was supporting the Dervish state who were at war with the British in the Somaliland campaign Von Syburg the German envoy in Addis Ababa said now the time has come for Ethiopia to regain the coast of the Red Sea driving the Italians home to restore the Empire to its ancient size The Ethiopian Empire was on the verge of entering World War I on the side of the Central Powers before Iyasu s overthrow at the Battle of Segale due to Allied pressure on the Ethiopian aristocracy Bermuda Volunteer Rifle Corps First Contingent in Bermuda winter 1914 1915 before joining 1 Lincolnshire Regiment in France in June 1915 The dozen remaining after Guedecourt on 25 September 1916 merged with a Second Contingent The two contingents suffered 75 casualties Several socialist parties initially supported the war when it began in August 1914 But European socialists split on national lines with the concept of class conflict held by radical socialists such as Marxists and syndicalists being overborne by their patriotic support for the war Once the war began Austrian British French German and Russian socialists followed the rising nationalist current by supporting their countries intervention in the war Italian nationalism was stirred by the outbreak of the war and was initially strongly supported by a variety of political factions One of the most prominent and popular Italian nationalist supporters of the war was Gabriele D Annunzio who promoted Italian irredentism and helped sway the Italian public to support intervention in the war The Italian Liberal Party under the leadership of Paolo Boselli promoted intervention in the war on the side of the Allies and used the Dante Alighieri Society to promote Italian nationalism Italian socialists were divided on whether to support the war or oppose it some were militant supporters of the war including Benito Mussolini and Leonida Bissolati However the Italian Socialist Party decided to oppose the war after anti militarist protestors were killed resulting in a general strike called Red Week The Italian Socialist Party purged itself of pro war nationalist members including Mussolini Mussolini formed the pro interventionist Il Popolo d Italia and the Fasci Rivoluzionario d Azione Internazionalista Revolutionary Fasci for International Action in October 1914 that later developed into the Fasci Italiani di Combattimento in 1919 the origin of fascism Mussolini s nationalism enabled him to raise funds from Ansaldo an armaments firm and other companies to create Il Popolo d Italia to convince socialists and revolutionaries to support the war Patriotic funds On both sides there was large scale fundraising for soldiers welfare their dependents and those injured The Nail Men were a German example Around the British Empire there were many patriotic funds including the Royal Patriotic Fund Corporation Canadian Patriotic Fund Queensland Patriotic Fund and by 1919 there were 983 funds in New Zealand At the start of the next world war the New Zealand funds were reformed having been criticised as overlapping wasteful and abused but 11 were still functioning in 2002 Opposition Many countries jailed those who spoke out against the conflict These included Eugene Debs in the US and Bertrand Russell in Britain In the US the Espionage Act of 1917 and Sedition Act of 1918 made it a federal crime to oppose military recruitment or make any statements deemed disloyal Publications at all critical of the government were removed from circulation by postal censors and many served long prison sentences for statements of fact deemed unpatriotic Sackville Street now O Connell Street after the 1916 Easter Rising in Dublin Several nationalists opposed intervention particularly within states that the nationalists were hostile to Although the vast majority of Irish people consented to participate in the war in 1914 and 1915 a minority of advanced Irish nationalists had staunchly opposed taking part The war began amid the Home Rule crisis in Ireland that had resurfaced in 1912 and by July 1914 there was a serious possibility of an outbreak of civil war in Ireland Irish nationalists and Marxists attempted to pursue Irish independence culminating in the Easter Rising of 1916 with Germany sending 20 000 rifles to Ireland to stir unrest in Britain The British government placed Ireland under martial law in response to the Easter Rising though once the immediate threat of revolution had dissipated the authorities did try to make concessions to nationalist feeling However opposition to involvement in the war increased in Ireland resulting in the Conscription Crisis of 1918 Other opposition came from conscientious objectors some socialist some religious who had refused to fight In Britain 16 000 people asked for conscientious objector status Some of them most notably prominent peace activist Stephen Hobhouse refused both military and alternative service Many suffered years of prison including solitary confinement Even after the war in Britain many job advertisements were marked No conscientious objectors need to apply On 1 4 May 1917 about 100 000 workers and soldiers of Petrograd and after them the workers and soldiers of other Russian cities led by the Bolsheviks demonstrated under banners reading Down with the war and all power to the Soviets The mass demonstrations resulted in a crisis for the Russian Provisional Government In Milan in May 1917 Bolshevik revolutionaries organised and engaged in rioting calling for an end to the war and managed to close down factories and stop public transportation The Italian army was forced to enter Milan with tanks and machine guns to face Bolsheviks and anarchists who fought violently until 23 May when the army gained control of the city Almost 50 people including three Italian soldiers were killed and over 800 people were arrested TechnologyRoyal Air Force Sopwith Camel In April 1917 the average life expectancy of a British pilot on the Western Front was 93 flying hours World War I began as a clash of 20th century technology and 19th century tactics with the inevitably large ensuing casualties By the end of 1917 however the major armies had modernised and were making use of telephone wireless communication armoured cars tanks especially with the advent of the prototype tank Little Willie and aircraft Captain Marcel Courmes pilot of the French 2nd Bombardment Group GB 2 in August 1915 Artillery also underwent a revolution In 1914 cannons were positioned in the front line and fired directly at their targets By 1917 indirect fire with guns as well as mortars and even machine guns was commonplace using new techniques for spotting and ranging notably aircraft and the field telephone Fixed wing aircraft were initially used for reconnaissance and ground attack To shoot down enemy planes anti aircraft guns and fighter aircraft were developed Strategic bombers were created principally by the Germans and British though the former used Zeppelins as well Towards the end of the conflict aircraft carriers were used for the first time with HMS Furious launching Sopwith Camels in a raid to destroy the Zeppelin hangars at Tonder in 1918 Diplomacy1917 political cartoon about the Zimmermann Telegram The non military diplomatic and propaganda interactions among the nations were designed to build support for the cause or to undermine support for the enemy For the most part wartime diplomacy focused on five issues propaganda campaigns defining and redefining the war goals which became harsher as the war went on luring neutral nations Italy Ottoman Empire Bulgaria Romania into the coalition by offering slices of enemy territory and encouragement by the Allies of nationalistic minority movements inside the Central Powers especially among Czechs Poles and Arabs In addition multiple peace proposals were coming from neutrals or one side or the other none of them progressed very far 329 Legacy and memoryMemorials The Italian Redipuglia War Memorial which contains the remains of 100 187 soldiers Memorials were built in thousands of villages and towns Close to battlefields those buried in improvised burial grounds were gradually moved to formal graveyards under the care of organisations such as the Commonwealth War Graves Commission the American Battle Monuments Commission the German War Graves Commission and Le Souvenir francais Many of these graveyards also have monuments to the missing or unidentified dead such as the Menin Gate Memorial to the Missing and the Thiepval Memorial to the Missing of the Somme In 1915 John McCrae a Canadian army doctor wrote the poem In Flanders Fields as a salute to those who perished in the war It is still recited today especially on Remembrance Day and Memorial Day A typical village war memorial to soldiers killed in World War I National World War I Museum and Memorial in Kansas City Missouri is a memorial dedicated to all Americans who served in World War I The Liberty Memorial was dedicated on 1 November 1921 The British government budgeted substantial resources to the commemoration of the war during the period 2014 to 2018 The lead body is the Imperial War Museum On 3 August 2014 French President Francois Hollande and German President Joachim Gauck together marked the centenary of Germany s declaration of war on France by laying the first stone of a memorial in Vieil Armand known in German as Hartmannswillerkopf for French and German soldiers killed in the war As part of commemorations for the centenary of the 1918 Armistice French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel visited the site of the signing of the Armistice of Compiegne and unveiled a plaque to reconciliation Historiography Strange friend I said Here is no cause to mourn None said the other Save the undone years Wilfred Owen Strange Meeting 1918 The first efforts to comprehend the meaning and consequences of modern warfare began during the initial phases of the war and are still underway more than a century later Teaching World War I has presented special challenges When compared with World War II the First World War is often thought to be a wrong war fought for the wrong reasons it lacks the metanarrative of good versus evil that characterises retellings of the Second World War Lacking recognizable heroes and villains it is often taught thematically invoking simplified tropes that obscure the complexity of the conflict Historian Heather Jones argues that the historiography has been reinvigorated by a cultural turn in the 21st century Scholars have raised entirely new questions regarding military occupation radicalisation of politics race medical science gender and mental health Among the major subjects that historians have long debated regarding the war include Why the war began why the Allies won whether generals were responsible for high casualty rates how soldiers endured the poor conditions of trench warfare and to what extent the civilian home front accepted and endorsed the war effort Unexploded ordnance As late as 2007 unexploded ordnance at battlefield sites like Verdun and Somme continued to pose a danger In France and Belgium locals who discover caches of unexploded munitions are assisted by weapons disposal units In some places plant life has still not recovered from the effects of the war See alsoLists of World War I topics List of military engagements of World War I Outline of World War I World war World War II Freemasonry during World War I List of wars by death tollFootnotesThe Russian Empire during 1914 1917 the Russian Republic during 1917 The Bolshevik government signed a separate peace with the Central Powers shortly after their armed seizure of power resulting in a Central Powers victory on the Eastern Front of the war and the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic s defeat However this peace treaty was nullified by an Allied Powers victory on the Western Front and the end of the war Often abbreviated as WWI or WW1 Only the Triple Alliance was a formal alliance the others listed were informal patterns of support German Skagerrakschlacht or Battle of the Skagerrak Bessarabia remained part of Romania until 1940 when it was annexed by Joseph Stalin as the Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic following the dissolution of the USSR in 1991 it became the independent Republic of Moldova Unlike the others the successor state to the Russian Empire the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics retained similar external borders via retaining or quickly recovering lost territories A German attempt to use chemical weapons on the Russian front in January 1915 failed to cause casualties 109 in this context see Long and short scales World War I officially ended when Germany paid off the final amount of reparations imposed on it by the Allies ReferencesBraybon 2004 p 8 The Great War The Independent 17 August 1914 p 228 Retrieved 17 May 2022 great adj adv and n Oxford English Dictionary Archived from the original on 14 May 2019 Retrieved 19 March 2012 The war to end all wars BBC News 10 November 1998 Archived from the original on 19 June 2015 Retrieved 15 December 2015 Shapiro amp Epstein 2006 p 329 Clark 2013 pp 121 152 Zeldin 1977 p 117 Joly Bertrand 1999 La France et la Revanche 1871 1914 Revue d Histoire Moderne amp Contemporaine 46 2 325 347 JSTOR 20530431 Archived from the original on 27 January 2024 Keegan 1998 p 52 Medlicott 1945 pp 66 70 Kennan 1986 p 20 Willmott 2003 p 15 Fay 1930 pp 290 293 Willmott 2003 p 21 Herwig 1988 pp 72 73 Moll amp Luebbert 1980 pp 153 185 Stevenson 2016 p 45 Crisp 1976 pp 174 196 Stevenson 2016 p 42 McMeekin 2015 pp 66 67 Clark 2013 p 86 Clark 2013 pp 251 252 McMeekin 2015 p 69 McMeekin 2015 p 73 Willmott 2003 pp 2 23 Clark 2013 p 288 Keegan 1998 pp 48 49 Bennett G H 1995 Bennett G H ed Eastern Europe Cordon Sanitaire or Powder Keg British Foreign Policy during the Curzon Period 1919 24 London Palgrave Macmillan UK pp 41 59 doi 10 1057 9780230377356 3 ISBN 978 0 230 37735 6 Archived from the original on 10 June 2024 Retrieved 10 June 2024 Stefanova Radoslava 2001 Balkan Clutter American and European Handling of a Powder Keg Revival The New Transatlantic Agenda Routledge ISBN 978 1 315 18640 5 Archived from the original on 10 June 2024 Retrieved 10 June 2024 Nelson Daniel N 1984 South Eastern Europe After Tito A Powder Keg for the 1980s Edited by David Carlton and Carlo Schaerf New York St Martin s Press 1983 xviii 211 pp Map 22 50 Slavic Review 43 4 717 718 doi 10 2307 2499359 ISSN 0037 6779 JSTOR 2499359 Archived from the original on 10 June 2024 Retrieved 10 June 2024 Finestone 1981 p 247 Smith 2010 He was photographed on the way to the station and the photograph has been reproduced many times in books and articles claiming to depict the arrest of Gavrilo Princip But there is no photograph of Gavro s arrest this photograph shows the arrest of Behr Butcher 2014 p 103 Butcher 2014 pp 188 189 Gilbert 1994 p 16 Willmott 2003 p 26 Clark Christopher 25 June 2014 Month of Madness BBC Radio 4 Archived from the original on 20 April 2017 Retrieved 14 March 2017 Djordjevic Dimitrije Spence Richard B 1992 Scholar patriot mentor historical essays in honour of Dimitrije Djordjevic East European Monographs p 313 ISBN 978 0 88033 217 0 Archived from the original on 17 February 2024 Retrieved 12 November 2018 Following the assassination of Franz Ferdinand in June 1914 Croats and Muslims in Sarajevo joined forces in an anti Serb pogrom Reports Service Southeast Europe series American Universities Field Staff 1964 p 44 Archived from the original on 6 September 2023 Retrieved 7 December 2013 the assassination was followed by officially encouraged anti Serb riots in Sarajevo Kroll Herbert 2008 Austrian Greek encounters over the centuries history diplomacy politics arts economics Studienverlag p 55 ISBN 978 3 7065 4526 6 Archived from the original on 17 February 2024 Retrieved 1 September 2013 arrested and interned some 5 500 prominent Serbs and sentenced to death some 460 persons a new Schutzkorps an auxiliary militia widened the anti Serb repression Tomasevich 2001 p 485 Schindler John R 2007 Unholy Terror Bosnia Al Qa ida and the Rise of Global Jihad Zenith Imprint p 29 ISBN 978 1 61673 964 5 Archived from the original on 17 February 2024 Retrieved 12 November 2018 Velikonja 2003 p 141 Stevenson 1996 p 12 MacMillan 2013 p 532 Willmott 2003 p 27 Fromkin 2004 pp 196 197 MacMillan 2013 p 536 Lieven 2016 p 326 Clark 2013 pp 526 527 Martel 2014 p 335 Gilbert 1994 p 27 Clayton 2003 p 45 Clark 2013 pp 539 541 Gilbert 1994 p 29 MacMillan 2013 pp 579 580 585 Crowe 2001 pp 4 5 Willmott 2003 p 29 Clark 2013 pp 550 551 Strachan 2003 pp 292 296 343 354 Tucker amp Roberts 2005 p 172 Schindler 2002 pp 159 195 Veliki rat Avijacija rts rs RTS Radio televizija Srbije Radio Television of Serbia Archived from the original on 10 July 2017 Retrieved 16 July 2019 How was the first military airplane shot down National Geographic Archived from the original on 31 August 2015 Retrieved 5 August 2015 Stevenson 2004 p 22 Horne 1964 p 22 Stevenson 2004 p 23 Holmes 2014 pp 194 211 Stevenson 2012 p 54 Jackson 2018 p 55 Lieven 2016 p 327 Tucker amp Roberts 2005 pp 376 378 Horne 1964 p 221 Donko 2012 p 79 Keegan 1998 pp 224 232 Falls 1960 pp 79 80 Farwell 1989 p 353 Brown 1994 pp 197 198 Brown 1994 pp 201 203 Kant Vedica 24 September 2014 India and WWI Piecing together the impact of the Great War on the subcontinent LSE Archived from the original on 28 September 2022 Retrieved 28 September 2022 Participants from the Indian subcontinent in the First World War Memorial Gates Trust Archived from the original on 1 July 2019 Retrieved 12 December 2008 Horniman Benjamin Guy 1984 British administration and the Amritsar massacre Mittal Publications p 45 Raudzens 1990 p 424 Raudzens 1990 pp 421 423 Gilbert 1994 p 99 Goodspeed 1985 p 199 Duffy Michael 22 August 2009 Weapons of War Poison Gas Firstworldwar com Archived from the original on 21 August 2007 Retrieved 5 July 2012 Love 1996 Dupuy 1993 p 1042 Grant 2005 p 276 Lichfield John 21 February 2006 Verdun myths and memories of the lost villages of France The Independent Archived from the original on 22 October 2017 Retrieved 23 July 2013 Harris 2008 p 271 Chorba Terence November 2018 Trench Conflict with Combatants and Infectious Disease Emerging Infectious Diseases 24 11 CDC 2136 2137 doi 10 3201 eid2411 ac2411 ISSN 1080 6040 Archived from the original on 10 June 2024 Retrieved 29 February 2024 Taylor 2007 pp 39 47 Keene 2006 p 5 Halpern 1995 p 293 Zieger 2001 p 50 Black Jeremy June 2016 Jutland s Place in History Naval History 30 3 16 21 Sheffield Garry The First Battle of the Atlantic World Wars in Depth BBC Archived from the original on 3 June 2019 Retrieved 11 November 2009 Gilbert 1994 p 306 von der Porten 1969 Jones 2001 p 80 Nova Scotia House of Assembly Committee on Veterans Affairs 9 November 2006 Committee Hansard Hansard Archived from the original on 23 November 2011 Retrieved 12 March 2013 Chickering Roger Forster Stig Greiner Bernd 2005 A world at total war global conflict and the politics of destruction 1937 1945 Publications of the German Historical Institute Washington DC Cambridge University Press ISBN 978 0 521 83432 2 Archived from the original on 17 February 2024 Retrieved 12 November 2018 Price 1980 Tucker amp Roberts 2005 p 241 Neiberg 2005 pp 54 55 Tucker amp Roberts 2005 pp 1075 1076 DiNardo 2015 p 102 Neiberg 2005 pp 108 110 Hall Richard 2010 Balkan Breakthrough The Battle of Dobro Pole 1918 Indiana University Press p 11 ISBN 978 0 253 35452 5 The Balkan Wars and World War I p 28 Library of Congress Country Studies Tucker Wood amp Murphy 1999 pp 150 152 Korsun N The Balkan Front of the World War in Russian militera lib ru Archived from the original on 9 August 2013 Retrieved 27 September 2010 Doughty 2005 p 491 Gettleman Marvin Schaar Stuart eds 2003 The Middle East and Islamic world reader 4th ed New York Grove Press pp 119 120 ISBN 978 0 8021 3936 8 January Brendan 2007 Genocide modern crimes against humanity Minneapolis Minn Twenty First Century Books p 14 ISBN 978 0 7613 3421 7 Lieberman Benjamin 2013 The Holocaust and Genocides in Europe New York Continuum Publishing Corporation pp 80 81 ISBN 978 1 4411 9478 7 Arthur J Barker The Neglected War Mesopotamia 1914 1918 London Faber 1967 Crawford John McGibbon Ian 2007 New Zealand s Great War New Zealand the Allies and the First World War Exisle Publishing pp 219 220 Fromkin 2004 p 119 Hinterhoff 1984 pp 499 503 The Encyclopedia Americana 1920 v 28 p 403 Northcote Dudley S 1922 Saving Forty Thousand Armenians Current History New York Times Co Archived from the original on 9 September 2021 Retrieved 9 September 2021 Sachar 1970 pp 122 138 Gilbert 1994 Hanioglu M Sukru 2010 A Brief History of the Late Ottoman Empire Princeton University Press pp 180 181 ISBN 978 0 691 13452 9 Thompson 2009 p 13 Thompson 2009 pp 9 10 Gardner 2015 p 120 Thompson 2009 p 14 Thompson 2009 pp 30 31 Gilbert 1994 p 166 Thompson 2009 p 57 Marshall amp Josephy 1982 p 108 Fornassin 2017 pp 39 62 Thompson 2009 p 163 Gilbert 1994 p 317 Gilbert 1994 p 482 Gilbert 1994 p 484 Thompson 2009 p 364 Gilbert 1994 p 491 Tucker amp Roberts 2005 p 715 Meyer 2006 pp 152 154 161 163 175 182 Smele 2011 Schindler 2003 p Tucker 2002 p 119 Lawrence Goodrich 2011 Cultural Studies Jones amp Bartlett Learning p 376 ISBN 9781449637286 Archived from the original on 20 August 2023 Retrieved 30 July 2023 Jelavich 1992 pp 441 442 Dumitru 2012 p 171 Dumitru 2012 p 170 Gilbert 1994 p 282 Torrie 1978 pp 7 8 Barrett 2013 pp 96 98 Romania in anii primului război mondial in Romanian Vol 2 p 831 Hitchins Keith 1994 Rumania 1866 1947 Clarendon Press p 269 Crampton 1994 pp 24 25 Bela 1998 p 429 Rothschild 1975 p 314 Alexander Lanoszka Michael A Hunzeker 11 November 2018 Why the First War lasted so long The Washington Post Archived from the original on 12 April 2022 Retrieved 11 November 2018 Keegan 1998 p 345 Kernek 1970 pp 721 766 Beckett 2007 p 523 Winter 2014 pp 110 132 Wheeler Bennett 1938 pp 36 41 Treaty of Bucharest with the Central Powers in May 1918 Stevenson 2012 pp 315 316 Stevenson 2012 p 317 Gilbert 1994 p 318 Grotelueschen 2006 pp 14 15 Stevenson 2012 p 318 Grotelueschen 2006 pp 44 46 Stevenson 2012 p 403 Clayton 2003 p 124 Clayton 2003 p 129 Strachan 2003 p 244 Inglis 1995 p 2 Humphries 2007 p 66 Horne 1964 p 323 Erickson 2001 p 163 Moore A Briscoe 1920 The Mounted Riflemen in Sinai amp Palestine The Story of New Zealand s Crusaders Christchurch Whitcombe amp Tombs p 67 OCLC 156767391 Falls Cyril 1930 Military Operations Part I Egypt amp Palestine Volume 2 From June 1917 to the End of the War Official History of the Great War Based on Official Documents by Direction of the Historical Section of the Committee of Imperial Defence Maps compiled by A F Becke London HM Stationery Office p 59 OCLC 1113542987 Wavell Earl 1968 1933 The Palestine Campaigns In Sheppard Eric William ed A Short History of the British Army 4th ed London Constable amp Co pp 153 155 OCLC 35621223 Text of the Decree of the Surrender of Jerusalem into British Control First World War com Archived from the original on 14 June 2011 Retrieved 13 May 2015 Bruce Anthony 2002 The Last Crusade The Palestine Campaign in the First World War London John Murray p 162 ISBN 978 0 7195 5432 2 Who s Who Kress von Kressenstein First World War com Archived from the original on 20 November 2015 Retrieved 13 May 2015 Who s Who Otto Liman von Sanders First World War com Archived from the original on 27 December 2007 Retrieved 13 May 2015 Erickson 2001 p 195 Ayers 1919 p 104 Heyman 1997 pp 146 147 Westwell 2004 Gray 1991 p 86 Rickard 2007 Schreiber Shane B 2004 1977 Shock Army of the British Empire The Canadian Corps in the Last 100 Days of the Great War St Catharines ON Vanwell p 50 ISBN 978 1 55125 096 0 OCLC 57063659 Rickard 2001 Brown Malcolm 1999 1998 1918 Year of Victory London Pan p 190 ISBN 978 0 330 37672 3 Gray amp Argyle 1990 McLellan p 49 Christie 1997 p The Battle of Dobro Polje The Forgotten Balkan Skirmish That Ended WW1 Militaryhistorynow com Archived from the original on 23 September 2017 Retrieved 21 November 2019 The Germans Could no Longer Keep up the Fight historycollection co 22 February 2017 Archived from the original on 23 December 2019 Retrieved 21 November 2019 1918 Timeline League of Nations Photo Archive Archived from the original on 5 May 2016 Retrieved 20 November 2009 The Battle of Dobro Polje The Forgotten Balkan Skirmish That Ended WW1 Militaryhistorynow com 21 September 2017 Archived from the original on 23 September 2017 Retrieved 21 November 2019 The Germans Could no Longer Keep up the Fight historycollection com 22 February 2017 Archived from the original on 23 December 2019 Retrieved 21 November 2019 Axelrod 2018 p 260 Andrea di Michele 2014 Trento Bolzano e Innsbruck l occupazione militare italiana del Tirolo 1918 1920 Trento Bolzano and Innsbruck The Italian Military Occupation of Tyrol 1918 1920 PDF Trento e Trieste Percorsi degli Italiani d Austria dal 48 all annessione in Italian 436 437 Archived from the original PDF on 2 October 2018 La forza numerica del contingente italiano vario con il passare dei mesi e al suo culmine raggiunse i 20 22 000 uomini The numerical strength of the Italian contingent varied with the passing of months and at its peak reached 20 22 000 men Clairiere de l Armistice in French Ville de Compiegne Archived from the original on 27 August 2007 Stevenson 2004 p 385 K Kuhl Die 14 Kieler Punkte The Kiel 14 points PDF Archived PDF from the original on 12 April 2019 Retrieved 23 November 2018 Dahnhardt D 1978 Revolution in Kiel Neumunster Karl Wachholtz Verlag p 91 ISBN 978 3 529 02636 2 Wette Wolfram 2006 Die Novemberrevolution Kiel 1918 In Fleischhauer Turowski eds Kieler Erinnerungsorte Boyens Stevenson 2004 p 383 Stevenson 2004 Chapter 17 France s oldest WWI veteran dies Archived 28 October 2016 at the Wayback Machine BBC News 20 January 2008 Tucker amp Roberts 2005 p 273 Hastedt Glenn P 2009 Encyclopedia of American Foreign Policy Infobase Publishing p 483 ISBN 978 1 4381 0989 3 Murrin John Johnson Paul McPherson James Gerstle Gary Fahs Alice 2010 Liberty Equality Power A History of the American People Vol II Cengage Learning p 622 ISBN 978 0 495 90383 3 Harding Ends War Signs Peace Decree at Senator s Home Thirty Persons Witness Momentous Act in Frelinghuysen Living Room at Raritan The New York Times 3 July 1921 Archived from the original on 4 December 2013 Retrieved 18 September 2017 No 31773 The London Gazette 10 February 1920 p 1671 No 31991 The London Gazette 23 July 1920 pp 7765 7766 No 13627 The London Gazette 27 August 1920 p 1924 No 32421 The London Gazette 12 August 1921 pp 6371 6372 No 32964 The London Gazette 12 August 1924 pp 6030 6031 Dates on war memorials PDF War Memorials Trust Archived PDF from the original on 12 January 2021 Retrieved 4 January 2021 Magliveras 1999 pp 8 12 Northedge 1986 pp 35 36 Morrow John H 2005 The Great War An Imperial History London Routledge p 290 ISBN 978 0 415 20440 8 Schulze Hagen 1998 Germany A New History Harvard University Press p 204 Ypersele Laurence Van 2012 Mourning and Memory 1919 45 In Horne John ed A Companion to World War I Wiley p 584 The Surrogate Hegemon in Polish Postcolonial Discourse Ewa Thompson Rice University PDF Archived PDF from the original on 29 October 2013 Retrieved 27 October 2013 Open Site Hungary Archived from the original on 3 January 2022 Retrieved 11 January 2022 Frucht p 356 Kocsis Karoly Hodosi Eszter Kocsisne 1998 Ethnic Geography of the Hungarian Minorities in the Carpathian Basin Geographical Research Institute Research Centre and Earth Sciences p 19 ISBN 978 963 7395 84 0 Clark 1927 Appeals to Americans to Pray for Serbians PDF The New York Times 27 July 1918 Archived PDF from the original on 16 September 2018 Retrieved 12 June 2018 Serbia Restored PDF The New York Times 5 November 1918 Archived PDF from the original on 16 September 2018 Retrieved 12 June 2018 Simpson Matt 22 August 2009 The Minor Powers During World War One Serbia firstworldwar com Archived from the original on 27 April 2010 Retrieved 27 May 2010 Cas Mudde Racist Extremism in Central and Eastern Europe Archived 15 May 2016 at the Wayback Machine ANZAC Day in London King Queen and General Birdwood at Services in Abbey The New York Times 26 April 1916 Archived from the original on 15 July 2016 Retrieved 25 July 2018 Australian War Memorial The ANZAC Day tradition Australian War Memorial Archived from the original on 1 May 2008 Retrieved 2 May 2008 The Diaspora Welcomes the Pope Archived 4 June 2012 at the Wayback Machine Der Spiegel Online 28 November 2006 Rummel R J 1998 The Holocaust in Comparative and Historical Perspective Idea Journal of Social Issues 3 2 Hedges Chris 17 September 2000 A Few Words in Greek Tell of a Homeland Lost The New York Times Archived from the original on 25 November 2018 Retrieved 23 February 2017 World War I Killed wounded and missing Encyclopaedia Britannica Retrieved 5 December 2021 War Losses International Encyclopedia of the First World War Retrieved 5 December 2021 Kitchen 2000 p 22 Sevillia Jean Histoire Passionnee de la France 2013 p 395 Howard 1993 p 166 Saadi 2009 Tschanz Spreeuwenberg 2018 pp 2561 2567 Knobler et al 2005 Ansart Severine Pelat Camille Boelle Pierre Yves Carrat Fabrice Flahault Antoine Valleron Alain Jacques May 2009 Mortality burden of the 1918 1919 influenza pandemic in Europe Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 3 3 Wiley 99 106 doi 10 1111 j 1750 2659 2009 00080 x PMC 4634693 PMID 19453486 K von Economo Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 10 May 1917 30 581 585 Die Encephalitis lethargica Leipzig and Vienna Franz Deuticke 1918 Reid A H McCall S Henry J M Taubenberger J K 2001 Experimenting on the Past The Enigma of von Economo s Encephalitis Lethargica J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 60 7 663 670 doi 10 1093 jnen 60 7 663 PMID 11444794 S2CID 40754090 War Horse The True Story Alberta Animal Health Source 10 November 2020 Archived from the original on 8 January 2024 Retrieved 8 January 2024 History of United States Involvement in Chemical Warfare www denix osd mil Archived from the original on 1 March 2024 Retrieved 1 March 2024 Fitzgerald Gerard April 2008 Chemical Warfare and Medical Response During World War I American Journal of Public Health 98 4 611 625 doi 10 2105 AJPH 2007 11930 PMC 2376985 PMID 18356568 Taylor Telford 1993 The Anatomy of the Nuremberg Trials A Personal Memoir Little Brown and Company p 34 ISBN 978 0 316 83400 1 Retrieved 20 June 2013 via Internet Archive Graham Thomas Lavera Damien J 2003 Cornerstones of Security Arms Control Treaties in the Nuclear Era University of Washington Press pp 7 9 ISBN 978 0 295 98296 0 Retrieved 5 July 2013 Morgenthau Henry 1918 XXV Talaat Tells Why He Deports the Armenians Ambassador Mogenthau s story Brigham Young University Archived from the original on 12 June 2012 Retrieved 6 June 2012 International Association of Genocide Scholars 13 June 2005 Open Letter to the Prime Minister of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan Archived from the original on 6 October 2007 Vartparonian Paul Leverkuehn Kaiser 2008 A German officer during the Armenian genocide a biography of Max von Scheubner Richter translated by Alasdair Lean with a preface by Jorge and a historical introduction by Hilmar London Taderon Press for the Gomidas Institute ISBN 978 1 903656 81 5 Archived from the original on 26 March 2017 Retrieved 14 May 2016 Ferguson 2006 p 177 International Association of Genocide Scholars PDF Archived from the original PDF on 10 October 2017 Retrieved 12 March 2013 Fromkin 1989 pp 212 215 International Association of Genocide Scholars Resolution on genocides committed by the Ottoman empire PDF Archived from the original PDF on 22 April 2008 Gaunt David 2006 Massacres Resistance Protectors Muslim Christian Relations in Eastern Anatolia during World War I Piscataway New Jersey Gorgias Press permanent dead link Schaller Dominik J Zimmerer Jurgen 2008 Late Ottoman genocides the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire and Young Turkish population and extermination policies introduction Journal of Genocide Research 10 1 7 14 doi 10 1080 14623520801950820 S2CID 71515470 Whitehorn Alan 2015 The Armenian Genocide The Essential Reference Guide The Essential Reference Guide ABC CLIO pp 83 218 ISBN 978 1 61069 688 3 Archived from the original on 1 August 2020 Retrieved 11 November 2018 Phillimore amp Bellot 1919 pp 4 64 Ferguson 1999 pp 368 369 Havighurst 1985 p 131 Ward Alan J 1974 Lloyd George and the 1918 Irish conscription crisis Historical Journal 17 1 107 129 doi 10 1017 S0018246X00005689 S2CID 162360809 Main J M 1970 Conscription the Australian debate 1901 1970 Archived from the original on 7 July 2015 Commonwealth Parliament from 1901 to World War I Parliament of Australia 4 May 2015 Archived from the original on 15 December 2018 Retrieved 15 December 2018 The Conscription Crisis CBC 2001 Archived from the original on 13 July 2014 Retrieved 14 August 2014 Chelmsford J E 15 April 1918 Clergy and Man Power The Times p 12 Chambers John Whiteclay 1987 To Raise an Army The Draft Comes to Modern America New York The Free Press ISBN 978 0 02 905820 6 Zinn Howard 2003 A People s History of the United States Harper Collins p 134 ISBN 978 0 06 052842 3 Pedersen Sarah 1 May 2002 A Surfeit of Socks The Impact of the First World War on Women Correspondents to Daily Newspapers Journal of Scottish Historical Studies 22 1 50 72 doi 10 3366 jshs 2002 22 1 50 hdl 10059 294 ISSN 1748 538X PMID 19489175 Archived from the original on 10 June 2024 Retrieved 10 June 2024 Trumpener Ulrich 4 November 1987 The Service Attaches and Military Plenipotentiaries of Imperial Germany 1871 1918 The International History Review 9 4 621 638 doi 10 1080 07075332 1987 9640462 ISSN 0707 5332 Archived from the original on 1 July 2022 Retrieved 10 June 2024 Craig Gordon A 1949 Military Diplomats in the Prussian and German Service The Attaches 1816 1914 Political Science Quarterly 64 1 65 94 doi 10 2307 2144182 ISSN 0032 3195 JSTOR 2144182 Archived from the original on 1 July 2022 Retrieved 10 June 2024 Noakes Lucy 2006 Women in the British Army War and the Gentle Sex 1907 1948 Abingdon England Routledge p 48 ISBN 978 0 415 39056 9 Cosgrave Jenny 10 March 2015 UK finally finishes paying for World War I CNBC Archived from the original on 20 March 2023 Retrieved 20 March 2023 Green 1938 p cxxvi Anton Kaes Martin Jay Edward Dimendberg eds 1994 The Treaty of Versailles The Reparations Clauses The Weimar Republic Sourcebook University of California Press p 8 ISBN 978 0 520 90960 1 Archived from the original on 15 January 2016 Retrieved 11 December 2015 Marks 1978 pp 231 232 Marks 1978 p 237 Marks 1978 pp 223 234 Stone Norman 2008 World War One A Short History London Penguin ISBN 978 0 14 103156 9 Marks 1978 p 233 Hall Allan 28 September 2010 First World War officially ends The Telegraph Berlin Archived from the original on 10 January 2022 Retrieved 15 March 2017 Suddath Claire 4 October 2010 Why Did World War I Just End Time Archived from the original on 5 October 2010 Retrieved 1 July 2013 World War I to finally end for Germany this weekend CNN 30 September 2010 Archived from the original on 16 March 2017 Retrieved 15 March 2017 MacMillan Margaret 25 December 2010 Ending the War to End All Wars The New York Times Archived from the original on 16 March 2017 Retrieved 15 March 2017 Souter 2000 p 354 Tucker amp Roberts 2005 p 1189 Tucker amp Roberts 2005 p 1001 Tucker amp Roberts 2005 p 117 Mukhtar Mohammed 2003 Historical Dictionary of Somalia Scarecrow Press p 126 ISBN 978 0 8108 6604 1 Archived from the original on 13 April 2021 Retrieved 28 February 2017 How Ethiopian prince scuppered Germany s WW1 plans BBC News 25 September 2016 Archived from the original on 13 April 2020 Retrieved 28 Februa

rec-icon Recommended Topics
Share this article
Read the free encyclopedia and learn everything...
See more
Read the free encyclopedia. All information in Wikipedia is available. No payment required.
Share this article on
Share
XXX 0C
Saturday, 15 March, 2025
Follow Us On