This article has problems when viewed in dark mode. Desktop readers can switch to light mode temporarily using the eyeglasses icon at the top of the page. |
Kernewek Kemmyn (Common Cornish or "KK") is a variety of the revived Cornish language.
Kernewek Kemmyn was developed, mainly by Ken George in 1986, based upon George's earlier doctoral thesis on the phonological history of Cornish. It takes much of its inspiration from medieval sources, particularly Cornish passion plays, as well as Breton and to a lesser extent Welsh. It was subsequently adopted by the Cornish Language Board as their preferred system. Like the earlier Unified Cornish, it retains a Middle Cornish base but aims to make the relationship between spelling and pronunciation more systematic by using an approximately morphophonemic orthography. In 2008, a survey indicated that KK users made up 55% of all Cornish speakers. The survey also showed that 21.5% of speakers continued to use the Unified system, and 14.8% were using Late Cornish.
The orthography has drawn heavy criticism from several writers. In 1994, Charles Penglase berated the lack of authenticity in KK, along with all systems based on Middle Cornish, resulting from the necessarily conjectural reconstruction of Middle Cornish phonology. In 1995, Nicholas Williams listed some 25 ways in which he believes the phonology and spelling of KK to be erroneous. In 1999, Jon Mills claimed that George's data contains a number of inaccuracies, and that "the English translation equivalents and neologisms given in the Gerlyver Kernewek Kemmyn entail a contrastive lexicology that is at odds with traditional practice as attested in the historical corpus of Cornish".
Several academics have also lent support to George's reconstruction. Peter Schrijver, in Studies in British Celtic Historical Phonology (1995), finds George's data to be broadly correct, agrees with his analysis of the Middle Cornish phonemic inventory, and supports the view that the Late British 'New Quantity System' was retained in Middle Cornish (pg. 206), all of which is in contrast to Mills and Williams criticisms. In fact, Schrijver's analysis differs from George's only in a few individual words.
Another issue, which has caused controversy is that of Cornish placenames. In many instances, there are multiple, conflicting etymologies and possible meanings, but KK has tended to respell these according to one theory or another. This respelling not only can obscure an alternative origin or meaning, but is not always in line with the practice of other forms of revived Cornish.
While its users claim it to be the largest, and so most successful, variety of Cornish, a survey in 2008 indicated that KK users only make up roughly half of all Cornish speakers. However 73.9% of "competent and frequent" writers of Cornish used KK, and 69.6% of them preferred to use KK. 70.4% of "competent and frequent" readers were found to prefer to read KK. Despite this, it has drawn heavy criticism from some areas, particularly its rival forms, Unified Cornish (Unyes) and Modern Cornish, although the survey found that "competent and frequent" writers of these forms of Cornish made up only 18.3% and 10.4% respectively.
In 1987 Kesva an Taves Kernewek (Cornish Language Board) voted to adopt the Kernewek Kemmyn form of Cornish as its standard.
While the various varieties of revived Cornish have had a rocky relationship with one another, this has had the positive effect of creating a publishing and writing boom in Cornish. All of them have been used in constructing the Cornish language Wikipedia, and also in Gorsedh Kernow, the Cornish Gorsedd.
Phonetics and phonology
The pronunciation of traditional Cornish is a matter of conjecture, but users of Revived Middle Cornish are more or less agreed about the phonology they use.
Consonants
This is a table of the phonology of Revived Middle Cornish (RMC) as recommended for the pronunciation of Kernewek Kemmyn orthography, using symbols from the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA).
| Labial | Dental | Alveolar | Post-al. /Palatal | Velar | Glottal | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nasal | m [m] | n [n] | ng [ŋ] | |||||||||
| Stop | p [p] | b [b] | t [t] | d [d] | k [k] | g [g] | ||||||
| Affricate | ch [tʃ] | j [dʒ] | ||||||||||
| Fricative | f [f] | v [v] | th [θ] | dh [ð] | s [s] | s [z] | gh [x] | h [h] | ||||
| Approximant /Lateral | r [ɾ] | y [j] | hw [ʍ] | w [w] | ||||||||
| l [l] | ||||||||||||
Vowels
These are tables of the phonology of Revived Middle Cornish as recommended for the pronunciation of Kernewek Kemmyn, using symbols from the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA).
| Front | Near- front | Central | Near- back | Back | ||
| Close | 
| |||||
| Near-close | ||||||
| Close-mid | ||||||
| Mid | ||||||
| Open-mid | ||||||
| Near-open | ||||||
| Open | ||||||
| Front | Near- front | Central | Near- back | Back | |
| Close | |||||
| Near-close | |||||
| Close-mid | |||||
| Mid | |||||
| Open-mid | |||||
| Near-open | |||||
| Open | |||||
Speakers who prefer a later pronunciation merge the rounded vowels with the unrounded one.
The vowels with their corresponding letters in the Kernewek Kemmyn orthography and the short/long pairs are as follows:
| Letter | a | e | eu | i | o | oe | ou | u | y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pronunciation short/long | a ~ aː | ɛ ~ ɛː | œː | iː | ɔ ~ ɔː | ɤ ~ oː | uː | yː | ɪ ~ ɪː |
Notes:
1. A vowel is considered short when it comes before double consonants (e.g. ⟨nn⟩, ⟨mm⟩, and so on), or before any two consonants.
2. Some vowels[which?] have a tendency to be reduced to schwas [ə] in unstressed syllables
References
- Jon, Mills (1999). Cornish Lexicography in the Twentieth Century: Standardisation and Divergence. Université de Neuchâtel, Institut de linguistique, Neuchâtel, SUISSE. OCLC 1078438166.
- J.), George, Ken (Ken. A phonological history of Cornish. OCLC 863473768.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Cornish Language Partnership (2008)"A Report on The Cornish Language Survey" Available: www.magakernow.org.uk .
- Charles Penglase, "Authenticity in the Revival of Cornish", in Cornish Studies. Second series: Two. Exeter: University of Exeter Press. Pp. 96-107. ISBN 0-85989-454-1
- Nicholas Williams, Cornish Today: an examination of the revived language. First and second editions: Sutton Coldfield: Kernewek dre Lyther, 1995; Third edition: Westport: Evertype, 2006. ISBN 978-1-904808-07-7
- Jon Mills, "Reconstructive Phonology and Contrastive Lexicography: Problems with the Gerlyver Kernewek Kemmyn", in Cornish Studies. Second series: Seven. Exeter: University of Exeter Press. Pp. 193-218. ISBN 0-85989-644-7
- Jon Mills, "Reconstructive Phonology and Contrastive Lexicography: Problems with the Gerlyver Kernewek Kemmyn" in Cornish Studies. Second series: Seven. Exeter: University of Exeter Press. Pp. 193-218. ISBN 0-85989-644-7
- Cornish Language Partnership (2008) "A Report on The Cornish Language Survey" Available: www.magakernow.org.uk
This article has problems when viewed in dark mode Desktop readers can switch to light mode temporarily using the eyeglasses icon at the top of the page You can help fix these problems see the official how to Kernewek Kemmyn Common Cornish or KK is a variety of the revived Cornish language Kernewek Kemmyn was developed mainly by Ken George in 1986 based upon George s earlier doctoral thesis on the phonological history of Cornish It takes much of its inspiration from medieval sources particularly Cornish passion plays as well as Breton and to a lesser extent Welsh It was subsequently adopted by the Cornish Language Board as their preferred system Like the earlier Unified Cornish it retains a Middle Cornish base but aims to make the relationship between spelling and pronunciation more systematic by using an approximately morphophonemic orthography In 2008 a survey indicated that KK users made up 55 of all Cornish speakers The survey also showed that 21 5 of speakers continued to use the Unified system and 14 8 were using Late Cornish The orthography has drawn heavy criticism from several writers In 1994 Charles Penglase berated the lack of authenticity in KK along with all systems based on Middle Cornish resulting from the necessarily conjectural reconstruction of Middle Cornish phonology In 1995 Nicholas Williams listed some 25 ways in which he believes the phonology and spelling of KK to be erroneous In 1999 Jon Mills claimed that George s data contains a number of inaccuracies and that the English translation equivalents and neologisms given in the Gerlyver Kernewek Kemmyn entail a contrastive lexicology that is at odds with traditional practice as attested in the historical corpus of Cornish Several academics have also lent support to George s reconstruction Peter Schrijver in Studies in British Celtic Historical Phonology 1995 finds George s data to be broadly correct agrees with his analysis of the Middle Cornish phonemic inventory and supports the view that the Late British New Quantity System was retained in Middle Cornish pg 206 all of which is in contrast to Mills and Williams criticisms In fact Schrijver s analysis differs from George s only in a few individual words Another issue which has caused controversy is that of Cornish placenames In many instances there are multiple conflicting etymologies and possible meanings but KK has tended to respell these according to one theory or another This respelling not only can obscure an alternative origin or meaning but is not always in line with the practice of other forms of revived Cornish While its users claim it to be the largest and so most successful variety of Cornish a survey in 2008 indicated that KK users only make up roughly half of all Cornish speakers However 73 9 of competent and frequent writers of Cornish used KK and 69 6 of them preferred to use KK 70 4 of competent and frequent readers were found to prefer to read KK Despite this it has drawn heavy criticism from some areas particularly its rival forms Unified Cornish Unyes and Modern Cornish although the survey found that competent and frequent writers of these forms of Cornish made up only 18 3 and 10 4 respectively In 1987 Kesva an Taves Kernewek Cornish Language Board voted to adopt the Kernewek Kemmyn form of Cornish as its standard While the various varieties of revived Cornish have had a rocky relationship with one another this has had the positive effect of creating a publishing and writing boom in Cornish All of them have been used in constructing the Cornish language Wikipedia and also in Gorsedh Kernow the Cornish Gorsedd Phonetics and phonologyThe pronunciation of traditional Cornish is a matter of conjecture but users of Revived Middle Cornish are more or less agreed about the phonology they use Consonants This is a table of the phonology of Revived Middle Cornish RMC as recommended for the pronunciation of Kernewek Kemmyn orthography using symbols from the International Phonetic Alphabet IPA Labial Dental Alveolar Post al Palatal Velar GlottalNasal m m n n ng ŋ Stop p p b b t t d d k k g g Affricate ch tʃ j dʒ Fricative f f v v th 8 dh d s s s z gh x h h Approximant Lateral r ɾ y j hw ʍ w w l l Vowels These are tables of the phonology of Revived Middle Cornish as recommended for the pronunciation of Kernewek Kemmyn using symbols from the International Phonetic Alphabet IPA Short Vowels Front Near front Central Near back BackClose ɪ ɤ e ɛ ɔ a Near closeClose midMidOpen midNear openOpenWhere symbols appear in pairs the one to the right represents a rounded vowel Long Vowels Front Near front Central Near back BackClose iː yː uː ɪː oː ɛː œː ɔː aː Near closeClose midMidOpen midNear openOpenWhere symbols appear in pairs the one to the right represents a rounded vowel Speakers who prefer a later pronunciation merge the rounded vowels with the unrounded one The vowels with their corresponding letters in the Kernewek Kemmyn orthography and the short long pairs are as follows Letter a e eu i o oe ou u yPronunciation short long a aː ɛ ɛː œː iː ɔ ɔː ɤ oː uː yː ɪ ɪː Notes 1 A vowel is considered short when it comes before double consonants e g nn mm and so on or before any two consonants 2 Some vowels which have a tendency to be reduced to schwas e in unstressed syllablesReferencesCornwall portalJon Mills 1999 Cornish Lexicography in the Twentieth Century Standardisation and Divergence Universite de Neuchatel Institut de linguistique Neuchatel SUISSE OCLC 1078438166 J George Ken Ken A phonological history of Cornish OCLC 863473768 a href wiki Template Cite book title Template Cite book cite book a CS1 maint multiple names authors list link Cornish Language Partnership 2008 A Report on The Cornish Language Survey Available www magakernow org uk Charles Penglase Authenticity in the Revival of Cornish in Cornish Studies Second series Two Exeter University of Exeter Press Pp 96 107 ISBN 0 85989 454 1 Nicholas Williams Cornish Today an examination of the revived language First and second editions Sutton Coldfield Kernewek dre Lyther 1995 Third edition Westport Evertype 2006 ISBN 978 1 904808 07 7 Jon Mills Reconstructive Phonology and Contrastive Lexicography Problems with the Gerlyver Kernewek Kemmyn in Cornish Studies Second series Seven Exeter University of Exeter Press Pp 193 218 ISBN 0 85989 644 7 Jon Mills Reconstructive Phonology and Contrastive Lexicography Problems with the Gerlyver Kernewek Kemmyn in Cornish Studies Second series Seven Exeter University of Exeter Press Pp 193 218 ISBN 0 85989 644 7 Cornish Language Partnership 2008 A Report on The Cornish Language Survey Available www magakernow org uk
