Cuneiform script

Author: www.NiNa.Az
Feb 06, 2025 / 07:32

This article should specify the language of its non English content using lang transliteration for transliterated langua

Cuneiform script
Cuneiform script
Cuneiform script

Cuneiform is a logo-syllabic writing system that was used to write several languages of the Ancient Near East. The script was in active use from the early Bronze Age until the beginning of the Common Era. Cuneiform scripts are marked by and named for the characteristic wedge-shaped impressions (Latin: cuneus) which form their signs. Cuneiform is the earliest known writing system and was originally developed to write the Sumerian language of southern Mesopotamia (modern Iraq).

Cuneiform
image
A trilingual cuneiform inscription of Xerxes I at Van Fortress in Turkey, an Achaemenid royal inscription written in Old Persian, Elamite and Babylonian forms of cuneiform
Script type and syllabary
Time period
c.โ€‰2900 BC โ€“ 2nd century AD
DirectionLeft-to-right
RegionSumer
LanguagesSumerian, Akkadian, Eblaite, Elamite, Hittite, Hurrian, Luwian, Urartian, Palaic, Aramaic, Old Persian
Related scripts
Parent systems
Proto-cuneiform (Proto-writing)
  • Cuneiform
Child systems
None; influenced the shape of Ugaritic and Old Persian glyphs
ISO 15924
ISO 15924Xsux (020), โ€‹Cuneiform, Sumero-Akkadian
Unicode
Unicode alias
Cuneiform
Unicode range
  • U+12000 to U+123FF Cuneiform
  • U+12400 to U+1247F Cuneiform Numbers and Punctuation
ย This article contains phonetic transcriptions in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA). For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA. For the distinction between [ย ], /ย / and โŸจย โŸฉ, see IPA ยงย Brackets and transcription delimiters.

Over the course of its history, cuneiform was adapted to write a number of languages in addition to Sumerian. Akkadian texts are attested from the 24th century BC onward and make up the bulk of the cuneiform record. Akkadian cuneiform was itself adapted to write the Hittite language in the early second millennium BC. The other languages with significant cuneiform corpora are Eblaite, Elamite, Hurrian, Luwian, and Urartian. The Old Persian and Ugaritic alphabets feature cuneiform-style signs; however, they are unrelated to the cuneiform logo-syllabary proper. The latest known cuneiform tablet dates to 75ย AD.

Cuneiform was rediscovered in modern times in the early 17th century with the publication of the trilingual Achaemenid royal inscriptions at Persepolis; these were first deciphered in the early 19th century. The modern study of cuneiform belongs to the ambiguously named field of Assyriology, as the earliest excavations of cuneiform libraries โ€“ in the mid-19th century โ€“ were in the area of ancient Assyria. An estimated half a million tablets are held in museums across the world, but comparatively few of these are published. The largest collections belong to the British Museum (approx.ย 130,000 tablets), the Vorderasiatisches Museum Berlin, the Louvre, the Istanbul Archaeology Museums, the National Museum of Iraq, the Yale Babylonian Collection (approx.ย 40,000 tablets), and Penn Museum.

History

Accounting tokens
image
Clay bulla and tokens, 4000โ€“3100 BC, Susa
image
Numerical tablet, 3500โ€“3350 BC (Uruk V phase), Khafajah
image
Pre-cuneiform tags, with drawing of goat or sheep and number (probably "10"), Al-Hasakah, 3300โ€“3100 BC, Uruk culture
image
A table illustrating the progressive simplification of cuneiform signs from archaic (vertical) script to Assyrian

Writing began after pottery was invented, during the Neolithic, when clay tokens were used to record specific amounts of livestock or commodities. In recent years a contrarian view has arisen on the tokens being the precursor of writing. These tokens were initially impressed on the surface of round clay envelopes (clay bullae) and then stored in them. The tokens were then progressively replaced by flat tablets, on which signs were recorded with a stylus. Writing is first recorded in Uruk, at the end of the 4th millennium BC, and soon after in various parts of the Near-East.

An ancient Mesopotamian poem gives the first known story of the invention of writing:

Because the messenger's mouth was heavy and he couldn't repeat [the message], the Lord of Kulaba patted some clay and put words on it, like a tablet. Until then, there had been no putting words on clay.

โ€”โ€ŠSumerian epic poem Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta. c.โ€‰1800 BC.

The cuneiform writing system was in use for more than three millennia, through several stages of development, from the 31st century BC down to the second century AD. The latest firmly dateable tablet, from Uruk, dates to 79/80ย AD. Ultimately, it was completely replaced by alphabetic writing, in the general sense, in the course of the Roman era, and there are no cuneiform systems in current use. It had to be deciphered as a completely unknown writing system in 19th-century Assyriology. It was successfully deciphered by 1857.

The cuneiform script changed considerably over more than 2,000ย years. The image below shows the development of the sign SAฤœ "head" (Borger nr. 184, U+12295 ๐’Š•).

image
Evolution of the cuneiform sign SAG "head", 3000โ€“1000 BC

Stages:

  1. shows the pictogram as it was drawn around 3000ย BC
  2. shows the rotated pictogram as written from c.โ€‰2800โ€“2600ย BC
  3. shows the abstracted glyph in archaic monumental inscriptions, from c.โ€‰2600 BC
  4. is the sign as written in clay, contemporary with stage 3
  5. represents the late 3rd millennium BC
  6. represents Old Assyrian ductus of the early 2nd millennium BC, as adopted into Hittite
  7. is the simplified sign as written by Assyrian scribes in the early 1st millennium BC and until the script's extinction.

Sumerian pictographs (circa 3300 BC)

image
A tablet with proto-cuneiform pictographic characters, end of 4th millennium BC, Uruk III. This is thought to be a list of slaves' names, the hand in the upper left corner representing the owner.

The cuneiform script was developed from pictographic proto-writing in the late 4th millennium BC, stemming from the near eastern token system used for accounting. The meaning and usage of these tokens is still a matter of debate. These tokens were in use from the 9th millennium BC and remained in occasional use even late in the 2nd millennium BC. Early tokens with pictographic shapes of animals, associated with numbers, were discovered in Tell Brak, and date to the mid-4th millennium BC. It has been suggested that the token shapes were the original basis for some of the Sumerian pictographs.

image
The Kish tablet, a limestone tablet from Kish with pictographic, early cuneiform, writing, 3500 BC. Possibly the earliest known example of writing. Ashmolean Museum.

Mesopotamia's "proto-literate" period spans roughly the 35th to 32nd centuries BC. The first unequivocal written documents start with the Uruk IV period, from circa 3,300ย BC, followed by tablets found in Uruk III, Jemdet Nasr, Early Dynastic I Ur and Susa (in Proto-Elamite) dating to the period until circa 2,900ย BC.

Originally, pictographs were either drawn on clay tablets in vertical columns with a sharpened reed stylus or incised in stone. This early style lacked the characteristic wedge shape of the strokes. Most Proto-Cuneiform records from this period were of an accounting nature. The proto-cuneiform sign list has grown, as new texts are discovered, and shrunk, as variant signs are combined. The current sign list is 705 elements long with 42 being numeric and four considered pre-proto-Elamite.

Certain signs to indicate names of gods, countries, cities, vessels, birds, trees, etc., are known as determinatives and were the Sumerian signs of the terms in question, added as a guide for the reader. Proper names continued to be usually written in purely "logographic" fashion.

Archaic cuneiform (c. 2900 BC)

image
Early pictographic signs in archaic cuneiform, used vertically before c.โ€‰2300 BC.

The first inscribed tablets were purely pictographic, which makes it technically difficult to know in which language they were written. Different languages have been proposed, though usually Sumerian is assumed. Later tablets dating after c.โ€‰2900 BC start to use syllabic elements, which clearly show a language structure typical of the agglutinative Sumerian language. The first tablets using syllabic elements date to the Early Dynastic Iโ€“II periods c.โ€‰2800 BC, and they are agreed to be clearly in Sumerian.

This is the time when some pictographic element started to be used for their phonetic value, permitting the recording of abstract ideas or personal names. Many pictographs began to lose their original function, and a given sign could have various meanings depending on context. The sign inventory was reduced from some 1,500 signs to some 600 signs, and writing became increasingly phonological. Determinative signs were re-introduced to avoid ambiguity. Cuneiform writing proper thus arises from the more primitive system of pictographs at about that time, labeled the Early Bronze Age II epoch by historians.

The earliest known Sumerian king, whose name appears on contemporary cuneiform tablets, is Enmebaragesi of Kish (fl.ย c.โ€‰2600 BC). Surviving records became less fragmentary for following reigns and by the arrival of Sargon, it had become standard practice for each major city-state to date documents by year-names, commemorating the exploits of its king.

Cuneiforms and hieroglyphs

Geoffrey Sampson stated that Egyptian hieroglyphs "came into existence a little after Sumerian script, and, probably, [were] invented under the influence of the latter", and that it is "probable that the general idea of expressing words of a language in writing was brought to Egypt from Sumerian Mesopotamia". There are many instances of Egypt-Mesopotamia relations at the time of the invention of writing, and standard reconstructions of the development of writing generally place the development of the Sumerian proto-cuneiform script before the development of Egyptian hieroglyphs, with the suggestion the former influenced the latter. But given the lack of direct evidence for the transfer of writing, "no definitive determination has been made as to the origin of hieroglyphics in ancient Egypt". Others have held that "the evidence for such direct influence remains flimsy" and that "a very credible argument can also be made for the independent development of writing in Egyptย ..."

Early Dynastic cuneiform (circa 2500 BC)

image
A sumerian inscription in monumental archaic style, c. 26th century BC

Early cuneiform inscriptions were made by using a pointed stylus, sometimes called "linear cuneiform". Many of the early dynastic inscriptions, particularly those made on stone, continued to use the linear style as late as circa 2000ย BC.

In the mid-3rd millennium BC, a new wedge-tipped stylus was introduced which was pushed into the clay, producing wedge-shaped cuneiform. This development made writing quicker and easier, especially when writing on soft clay. By adjusting the relative position of the stylus to the tablet, the writer could use a single tool to make a variety of impressions. For numbers, a round-tipped stylus was initially used, until the wedge-tipped stylus was generalized. The direction of writing was from top-to-bottom and right-to-left. Cuneiform clay tablets could be fired in kilns to bake them hard, and so provide a permanent record, or they could be left moist and recycled if permanence was not needed. Most surviving cuneiform tablets were of the latter kind, accidentally preserved when fires destroyed the tablets' storage place and effectively baked them, unintentionally ensuring their longevity.

From linear to angular
image
Wedge-tipped stylus for cuneiform writing on clay tablets
image
The regnal name "Lugal-dalu" in archaic linear script circa 2500 BC, and the same name stylized with standard Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform (๐’ˆ—๐’•๐’‡ป).

The script was widely used on commemorative stelae and carved reliefs to record the achievements of the ruler in whose honor the monument had been erected. The spoken language included many homophones and near-homophones, and in the beginning, similar-sounding words such as "life" [til] and "arrow" [ti] were written with the same symbol (๐’‹พ). As a result, many signs gradually changed from being logograms to also functioning as syllabograms, so that for example, the sign for the word "arrow" would become the sign for the sound "ti".

Syllabograms were used in Sumerian writing especially to express grammatical elements, and their use was further developed and modified in the writing of the Akkadian language to express its sounds. Often, words that had a similar meaning but very different sounds were written with the same symbol. For instance the Sumerian words 'tooth' [zu], 'mouth' [ka] and 'voice' [gu] were all written with the original pictogram for mouth (๐’…—).

image
A contract for the sale of a field and a house, in the wedge-shaped cuneiform adapted for clay tablets, Shuruppak, circa 2600ย BC.

Words that sounded alike would have different signs; for instance, the syllable [ษกu] had fourteen different symbols.

The inventory of signs was expanded by the combination of existing signs into compound signs. They could either derive their meaning from a combination of the meanings of both original signs (e.g. ๐’…— ka 'mouth' and ๐’€€ a 'water' were combined to form the sign for ๐’…˜ nagฬƒ 'drink', formally KAร—A; cf. Chinese compound ideographs), or one sign could suggest the meaning and the other the pronunciation (e.g. ๐’…— ka 'mouth' was combined with the sign ๐’‰ฃ nun 'prince' to express the word ๐’…ป nundum, meaning 'lip', formally KAร—NUN; cf. Chinese phono-semantic compounds).

Another way of expressing words that had no sign of their own was by so-called 'Diri compounds' โ€“ sign sequences that have, in combination, a reading different from the sum of the individual constituent signs (for example, the compound IGI.A (๐’…†๐’€€) โ€“ "eye" + "water" โ€“ has the reading imhur, meaning "foam").

Several symbols had too many meanings to permit clarity. Therefore, symbols were put together to indicate both the sound and the meaning of a symbol. For instance, the word 'raven' (UGA) had the same logogram (๐’‰€) as the word 'soap' (NAGA), the name of a city (EREล ), and the patron goddess of Eresh (NISABA). To disambiguate and identify the word more precisely, two phonetic complements were added โ€“ รš (๐’Œ‘) for the syllable [u] in front of the symbol and GA (๐’‚ต) for the syllable [ga] behind. Finally, the symbol for 'bird', MUล EN (๐’„ท) was added to ensure proper interpretation. As a result, the whole word could be spelt ๐’Œ‘๐’‰€๐’‚ต๐’„ท, i.e. รš.NAGA.GAmuลกen (among the many variant spellings that the word could have).

For unknown reasons, cuneiform pictographs, until then written vertically, were rotated 90ยฐ counterclockwise, in effect putting them on their side. This change first occurred slightly before the Akkadian period, at the time of the Uruk ruler Lugalzagesi (r. c. 2294โ€“2270ย BC). The vertical style remained for monumental purposes on stone stelas until the middle of the 2nd millennium.

Written Sumerian was used as a scribal language until the first century AD. The spoken language died out between about 2100 and 1700ย BC.

Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform

Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform syllabary
(circa 2200 BC)
image
image
Left: Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform syllabary, used by early Akkadian rulers. Right: Seal of Akkadian Empire ruler Naram-Sin (reversed for readability), c. 2250 BC. The name of Naram-Sin (Akkadian: ๐’€ญ๐’ˆพ๐’Š๐’„ ๐’€ญ๐’‚—๐’ช: DNa-ra-am DSรฎn, Sรฎn being written ๐’‚—๐’ช EN.ZU), appears vertically in the right column. British Museum. These are some of the more important signs: the complete Sumero-Akkadian list of characters actually numbers about 600, with many more "values", or pronunciation possibilities.

The archaic cuneiform script was adopted by the Akkadian Empire from the 23rd century BC (short chronology). The Akkadian language being East Semitic, its structure was completely different from Sumerian. The Akkadians found a practical solution in writing their language phonetically, using the corresponding Sumerian phonetic signs. Still, many of the Sumerian characters were retained for their logographic value as well: for example the character for "sheep" was retained, but was now pronounced immerum, rather than the Sumerian udu. Such retained individual signs or, sometimes, entire sign combinations with logographic value are known as Sumerograms, a type of heterogram.

The East Semitic languages employed equivalents for many signs that were distorted or abbreviated to represent new values because the syllabic nature of the script as refined by the Sumerians was not intuitive to Semitic speakers. From the beginning of the Middle Bronze Age (20th century BC), the script evolved to accommodate the various dialects of Akkadian: Old Akkadian, Babylonian and Assyrian. At this stage, the former pictograms were reduced to a high level of abstraction, and were composed of only five basic wedge shapes: horizontal, vertical, two diagonals and the Winkelhaken impressed vertically by the tip of the stylus. The signs exemplary of these basic wedges are:

  • Aล  (B001, U+12038) ๐’€ธ: horizontal;
  • DIล  (B748, U+12079) ๐’น: vertical;
  • GE23, DIล  tenรป (B575, U+12039) ๐’€น: downward diagonal;
  • GE22 (B647, U+1203A) ๐’€บ: upward diagonal;
  • U (B661, U+1230B) ๐’Œ‹: the Winkelhaken.
2nd millennium BC cuneiforms
image
The Babylonian king Hammurabi still used vertical cuneiform circa 1750 BC.
image
Babylonian tablets of the time of Hammurabi (circa 1750 BC).
Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform, either in inscriptions or on clay tablets, continued to be in use throughout the 2nd millennium BC.

Except for the Winkelhaken, which has no tail, the length of the wedges' tails could vary as required for sign composition.

Signs tilted by about 45 degrees are called tenรป in Akkadian, thus DIล  is a vertical wedge and DIล  tenรป a diagonal one. If a sign is modified with additional wedges, this is called gunรป or "gunification"; if signs are cross-hatched with additional Winkelhaken, they are called ลกeลกig; if signs are modified by the removal of a wedge or wedges, they are called nutillu.

"Typical" signs have about five to ten wedges, while complex ligatures can consist of twenty or more (although it is not always clear if a ligature should be considered a single sign or two collated, but distinct signs); the ligature KAxGUR7 consists of 31 strokes.

Most later adaptations of Sumerian cuneiform preserved at least some aspects of the Sumerian script. Written Akkadian included phonetic symbols from the Sumerian syllabary, together with logograms that were read as whole words. Many signs in the script were polyvalent, having both a syllabic and logographic meaning. The complexity of the system bears a resemblance to Old Japanese, written in a Chinese-derived script, where some of these Sinograms were used as logograms and others as phonetic characters.

This "mixed" method of writing continued through the end of the Babylonian and Assyrian empires, although there were periods when "purism" was in fashion and there was a more marked tendency to spell out the words laboriously, in preference to using signs with a phonetic complement.[clarification needed] Yet even in those days, the Babylonian syllabary remained a mixture of logographic and phonemic writing.

Elamite cuneiform

Elamite cuneiform was a simplified form of the Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform, used to write the Elamite language in the area that corresponds to modern Iran from the 3rd millennium BC to the 4th century BC. Elamite cuneiform at times competed with other local scripts, Proto-Elamite and Linear Elamite. The earliest known Elamite cuneiform text is a treaty between Akkadians and the Elamites that dates back to 2200ย BC. Some believe it might have been in use since 2500ย BC. The tablets are poorly preserved, so only limited parts can be read, but it is understood that the text is a treaty between the Akkad king Nฤramsรฎn and Elamite ruler Hita, as indicated by frequent references like "Nฤramsรฎn's friend is my friend, Nฤramsรฎn's enemy is my enemy".

The most famous Elamite scriptures and the ones that ultimately led to its decipherment are the ones found in the trilingual Behistun inscriptions, commissioned by the Achaemenid kings. The inscriptions, similar to that of the Rosetta Stone's, were written in three different writing systems. The first was Old Persian, which was deciphered in 1802 by Georg Friedrich Grotefend. The second, Babylonian cuneiform, was deciphered shortly after the Old Persian text. Because Elamite is unlike its neighboring Semitic languages, the script's decipherment was delayed until the 1840s.

Elamite cuneiform appears to have used far fewer signs than its Akkadian prototype and initially relied primarily on syllabograms, but logograms became more common in later texts. Many signs soon acquired highly distinctive local shape variants that are often difficult to recognise as related to their Akkadian prototypes.

Hittite cuneiform

Hittite cuneiform is an adaptation of the Old Assyrian cuneiform of c.ย 1800ย BC to the Hittite language and was used from the 17th until approximately the 13th century BC. More or less the same system was used by the scribes of the Hittite Empire for two other Anatolian languages, namely Luwian (alongside the native Anatolian hieroglyphics) and Palaic, as well as for the isolate Hattic language. When the cuneiform script was adapted to writing Hittite, a layer of Akkadian logographic spellings, also known as Akkadograms, was added to the script, in addition to the Sumerian logograms, or Sumerograms, which were already inherent in the Akkadian writing system and which Hittite also kept. Thus the pronunciations of many Hittite words which were conventionally written by logograms are now unknown.

Hurrian and Urartian cuneiform

The Hurrian language (attested 2300โ€“1000ย BC) and Urartian language (attested 9thโ€“6th century BC) were also written in adapted versions of Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform. Although the two languages are related, their writing systems seem to have been developed separately. For Hurrian, there were even different systems in different polities (in Mitanni, in Mari, in the Hittite Empire). The Hurrian orthographies were generally characterised by more extensive use of syllabograms and more limited use of logograms than Akkadian. Urartian, in comparison, retained a more significant role for logograms.

Neo-Assyrian and Neo-Babylonian cuneiform

Neo-Assyrian cuneiform syllabary
(circa 650 BC)
image
image
Left: Simplified cuneiform syllabary, in use during the Neo-Assyrian period. The "C" before and after vowels stands for "Consonant". Right: Mesopotamian palace paving slab, c. 600 BC

In the Iron Age (c. 10th to 6th centuries BC), Assyrian cuneiform was further simplified. The characters remained the same as those of Sumero-Akkadian cuneiforms, but the graphic design of each character relied more heavily on wedges and square angles, making them significantly more abstract:

Babylonian cuneiform was simplified along similar lines during that period, albeit to a lesser extent and in a slightly different way. From the 6th century, the Akkadian language was marginalized by Aramaic, written in the Aramaic alphabet, but Akkadian cuneiform remained in use in the literary tradition well into the times of the Parthian Empire (250ย BCโ€“226ย AD). The last known cuneiform inscription, an astronomical text, was written in 75ย AD. The ability to read cuneiform may have persisted until the third century AD.

Derived scripts

Old Persian cuneiform (5th century BC)

Old Persian cuneiform syllabary
(circa 500 BC)
image
image
Old Persian cuneiform syllabary (left), and the DNa inscription (part II) of Darius the Great (circa 490 BC), in the newly created Old Persian cuneiform.

The complexity of cuneiforms prompted the development of a number of simplified versions of the script. Old Persian cuneiform was developed with an independent and unrelated set of simple cuneiform characters, by Darius the Great in the 5th century BC. Most scholars consider this writing system to be an independent invention because it has no obvious connections with other writing systems at the time, such as Elamite, Akkadian, Hurrian, and Hittite cuneiforms.

It formed a semi-alphabetic syllabary, using far fewer wedge strokes than Assyrian used, together with a handful of logograms for frequently occurring words like "god" (๐Ž), "king" (๐‹) or "country" (๐Œ). This almost purely alphabetical form of the cuneiform script (36 phonetic characters and 8 logograms), was specially designed and used by the early Achaemenid rulers from the 6th century BC down to the 4th century BC.

Because of its simplicity and logical structure, the Old Persian cuneiform script was the first to be deciphered by modern scholars, starting with the accomplishments of Georg Friedrich Grotefend in 1802. Various ancient bilingual or trilingual inscriptions then permitted to decipher the other, much more complicated and more ancient scripts, as far back as to the 3rd millennium Sumerian script.

Ugaritic

Ugaritic was written using the Ugaritic alphabet, a standard Semitic style alphabet (an abjad) written using the cuneiform method.

Archaeology

Between half a million and two million cuneiform tablets are estimated to have been excavated in modern times, of which only approximately 30,000โ€“100,000 have been read or published. The British Museum holds the largest collection (approx. 130,000 tablets), followed by the Vorderasiatisches Museum Berlin, the Louvre, the Istanbul Archaeology Museums, the National Museum of Iraq, the Yale Babylonian Collection (approx. 40,000), and Penn Museum. Most of these have "lain in these collections for a century without being translated, studied or published", as there are only a few hundred qualified cuneiformists in the world.

Decipherment

image
Garcรญa de Silva Figueroa (1620)
image
Pietro Della Valle (1621)
The first cuneiform inscriptions published in modern times, both copied from Achaemenid royal inscriptions in Persepolis in the early 17th century. Pietro Della Valle's inscription, today known as XPb, is from the Palace of Xerxes.

The decipherment of cuneiform began with the decipherment of Old Persian cuneiform in 1836.

The first cuneiform inscriptions published in modern times were copied from the Achaemenid royal inscriptions in the ruins of Persepolis, with the first complete and accurate copy being published in 1778 by Carsten Niebuhr. Niebuhr's publication was used by Grotefend in 1802 to make the first breakthrough โ€“ the realization that Niebuhr had published three different languages side by side and the recognition of the word "king".

The rediscovery and publication of cuneiform took place in the early 17th century, and early conclusions were drawn such as the writing direction and that the Achaemenid royal inscriptions are three different languages, with two different scripts. In 1620, Garcรญa de Silva Figueroa dated the inscriptions of Persepolis to the Achaemenid period, identified them as Old Persian, and concluded that the ruins were the ancient residence of Persepolis. In 1621, Pietro Della Valle specified the direction of writing from left to right.

In 1762, Jean-Jacques Barthรฉlemy found that an inscription in Persepolis resembled that found on a brick in Babylon. Carsten Niebuhr made the first copies of the inscriptions of Persepolis in 1778 and settled on three different types of writing, which subsequently became known as Niebuhr I, II and III. He was the first to discover the sign for a word division in one of the scriptures. Oluf Gerhard Tychsen was the first to list 24 phonetic or alphabetic values for the characters in 1798.

Actual decipherment did not take place until the beginning of the 19th century, initiated by Georg Friedrich Grotefend in his study of Old Persian cuneiform. He was followed by Antoine-Jean Saint-Martin in 1822 and Rasmus Christian Rask in 1823, who was the first to decipher the name Achaemenides and the consonants m and n. Eugรจne Burnouf identified the names of various satrapies and the consonants k and z in 1833โ€“1835. Christian Lassen contributed significantly to the grammatical understanding of the Old Persian language and the use of vowels. The decipherers used the short trilingual inscriptions from Persepolis and the inscriptions from Ganjnฤme for their work.

In a final step, the decipherment of the trilingual Behistun Inscription was completed by Henry Rawlinson and Edward Hincks. Edward Hincks discovered that Old Persian is partly a syllabary.

In 2023 it was shown that automatic high-quality translation of cuneiform languages like Akkadian can be achieved using natural language processing methods with convolutional neural networks.

Transliteration

image
An extract from the Cyrus Cylinder (lines 15โ€“21), giving the genealogy of Cyrus the Great and an account of his capture of Babylon in 539ย BC
image
The cuneiform sign "EN", for "Lord" or "Master": the evolution from the pictograph of a throne circa 3000ย BC, followed by simplification and rotation down to circa 600ย BC.
Cylinder of Antiochus I
(c.250 BC)
image
The Antiochus cylinder, written by Antiochus I Soter as great king of kings of Babylon, restorer of the temples E-sagila and E-zida, circa 250 BC. Written in traditional Akkadian (with the same text in Babylonian and Assyrian given here for comparison).
image
Antiochus I Soter with titles in Akkadian on the cylinder of Antiochus:
"Antiochus, King, Great King, King of multitudes, King of Babylon, King of countries".
Note that while the images above transcribe the Akkadian pronunciation of the text, the actual spelling is highly logographic and would be strictly transliterated as follows, with the logograms (Sumerograms) capitalised and the syllabograms (phonetic signs) italicised:
1. DIล an-ti-สพu-ku-us LUGAL GAL-รบ
2. LUGAL dan-nu LUGAL ล รR LUGAL E.KI LUGAL KUR-KUR
3. za-ni-in ร‰.SAG.รL รน ร‰.ZI.DA
In Unicode:
1. ๐’น๐’€ญ๐’‹พ๐’€ช๐’†ช๐’Šป๐’ˆ—๐’ƒฒ๐’Œ‘
2. ๐’ˆ—๐’†—๐’‰ก๐’ˆ—๐’Ž—๐’ˆ—๐’‚Š๐’† ๐’ˆ—๐’†ณ๐’†ณ
3. ๐’๐’‰Œ๐’…”๐’‚๐’Š•๐’…๐’…‡๐’‚๐’ฃ๐’•

Cuneiform has a specific format for transliteration. Because of the script's polyvalence, transliteration requires certain choices of the transliterating scholar, who must decide in the case of each sign which of its several possible meanings is intended in the original document. For example, the sign dingir (๐’€ญ) in a Hittite text may represent either the Hittite syllable an or may be part of an Akkadian phrase, representing the syllable il, it may be a Sumerogram, representing the original Sumerian meaning, 'god' or the determinative for a deity. In transliteration, a different rendition of the same glyph is chosen depending on its role in the present context.

Therefore, a text containing DINGIR (๐’€ญ) and A (๐’€€) in succession could be construed to represent the Akkadian words "ana", "ila", god + "a" (the accusative case ending), god + water, or a divine name "A" or Water. Someone transcribing the signs would make the decision how the signs should be read and assemble the signs as "ana", "ila", "Ila" ("god"+accusative case), etc. A transliteration of these signs, would separate the signs with dashes "il-a", "an-a", "DINGIR-a" or "Da". This is still easier to read than the original cuneiform, but now the reader is able to trace the sounds back to the original signs and determine if the correct decision was made on how to read them. A transliterated document thus presents the reading preferred by the transliterating scholar as well as an opportunity to reconstruct the original text.

There are differing conventions for transliterating different languages written with Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform. The following conventions see wide use across the different fields:

  • To disambiguate between homophones, i.e. between signs pronounced identically, the letters that express the pronunciation of a sign are supplemented with subscript numbers. For example, u1 stands for the glyph ๐’Œ‹, u2 stands for ๐’Œ‘, and u3 stands for ๐’…‡, all thought to have been pronounced /u/. No.ย 1 is usually treated as the default interpretation and not indicated explicitly, so u is equivalent to u1. For the numbers 2 and 3, accent diacritics are often used as well: an acute accent stands for no.ย 2 and a grave accent for no.ย 3. Thus, u is equivalent to u1 (๐’Œ‹), รบ is equivalent to u2 (๐’Œ‘) and รน to u3 (๐’…‡). The sequence of numbering is conventional but essentially arbitrary and a consequence of the history of decipherment.
  • As shown above, signs as such are represented in capital letters. The specific reading selected in the transliteration is represented in small letters. Thus, capital letters can be used to indicate a so-called Diri compound, in which a sequence of signs does not stand for a combination of their usual readings, as in the spelling ๐’…†๐’€€ IGI.A for the word imhur 'foam' given above. Capital letters may also be used to indicate a Sumerogram, for example, Kร™.BABBAR ๐’†ฌ๐’Œ“ โ€“ Sumerian for "silver" โ€“ being used with the intended Akkadian reading kaspum, "silver", or simply a sign sequence of whose reading the editor is uncertain. Naturally, the "real" reading, if it is clear, will be presented in small letters in the transliteration: IGI.A will be rendered as imhur4. An Akkadogram in Hittite is indicated by capital letters as well, but they are italicised: e.g. ME-E transcribes the sign sequence ๐’ˆจ๐’‚Š when the intended reading is Hittite wฤtar "water", based on Akkadian mรช "water (accusative-genitive case)".
  • Another convention is that determinatives are written in superscript: thus, the sequence ๐’€•๐’†  (the name of the city Uruk) is transliterated as unugki to show that the second sign, KI, meaning "earth", isn't intended to be pronounced, but only specifies the type of meaning the former sign has. In this case, that it is a place name. A few common determinatives are transliterated with abbreviations: for example, d represents the sign ๐’€ญ DINGIR when it serves as an indicator that one or more following signs form the name of a deity, as seen in the transliteration of ๐’€ญ๐’‚—๐’†ค as den-lรญl "Enlil". ๐’น DIล  'one' and ๐’Šฉ MUNUS 'woman' as prefixed determinatives for male and female personal names, uncommon in Sumerian, but subsequently used for some other languages, are often rendered with the abbreviations m and f for "masculine" and "feminine".
  • In Sumerian transliteration, a multiplication sign ('ร—') is used to indicate typographic ligatures. For example, the sign ๐’…ป NUNDUM, which stands for the word nundum "lip", can also be designated as KAร—NUN, which indicates that it is a compound of the signs ๐’…— KA "mouth" and ๐’‰ฃ NUN "prince".

Since the Sumerian language has only been widely known and studied by scholars for approximately a century, changes in the accepted reading of Sumerian names have occurred from time to time. Thus the name of a king of Ur, ๐’Œจ๐’€ญ๐’‡‰, read Ur-Bau at one time,[citation needed] was later read as Ur-Engur, and is now read as Ur-Nammu or Ur-Namma; for Lugal-zage-si (๐’ˆ—๐’ ๐’„€๐’‹›), a king of Uruk, some scholars continued to read Ungal-zaggisi; and so forth. With some names of the older period, there was often uncertainty whether their bearers were Sumerians or Semites. If the former, then their names could be assumed to be read as Sumerian. If they were Semites, the signs for writing their names were probably to be read according to their Semitic equivalents. Though occasionally, Semites might be encountered bearing genuine Sumerian names.

There was doubt whether the signs composing a Semite's name represented a phonetic reading or a logographic compound. Thus, e.g. when inscriptions of a Semitic ruler of Kish, whose name was written ๐’Œท๐’ˆฌ๐’‘, Uru-mu-ush, were first deciphered, that name was first taken to be logographic because uru mu-ush could be read as "he founded a city" in Sumerian, and scholars accordingly retranslated it back to the original Semitic as Alu-usharshid. It was later recognized that the URU sign (๐’Œท) can also be read as rรญ and that the name is that of the Akkadian king Rimush.

Sign inventories

image
Cuneiform writing in Ur, southern Iraq

The Sumerian cuneiform script had on the order of 1,000 distinct signs, or about 1,500 if variants are included. This number was reduced to about 600 by the 24th century BC and the beginning of Akkadian records. Not all Sumerian signs are used in Akkadian texts, and not all Akkadian signs are used in Hittite.

A. Falkenstein (1936) lists 939 signs used in the earliest period, late Uruk, 34th to 31st centuries. See #Bibliography for the works mentioned in this paragraph. With an emphasis on Sumerian forms, Deimel (1922) lists 870 signs used in the Early Dynastic II period (28th century, Liste der archaischen Keilschriftzeichen or "LAK") and for the Early Dynastic IIIa period (26th century, ล umerisches Lexikon or "ล L").

Rosengarten (1967) lists 468 signs used in Sumerian (pre-Sargonian) Lagash. Mittermayer and Attinger (2006, Altbabylonische Zeichenliste der Sumerisch-Literarischen Texte or "aBZL") list 480 Sumerian forms, written in Isin-Larsa and Old Babylonian times. Regarding Akkadian forms, the standard handbook for many years was Borger (1981, Assyrisch-Babylonische Zeichenliste or "ABZ") with 598 signs used in Assyrian/Babylonian writing, recently superseded by Borger (2004, Mesopotamisches Zeichenlexikon or "MesZL") with an expansion to 907 signs, an extension of their Sumerian readings and a new numbering scheme.

Signs used in Hittite cuneiform are listed by Forrer (1922), Friedrich (1960) and Rรผster and Neu (1989, Hethitisches Zeichenlexikon or "HZL"). The HZL lists a total of 375 signs, many with variants (for example, 12 variants are given for number 123 EGIR).

Syllabary

The tables below contain the transliteration schemes of Sumero-Akkadian syllabograms.

This article should specify the language of its non English content using lang transliteration for transliterated languages and IPA for phonetic transcriptions with an appropriate ISO 639 code Wikipedia s multilingual support templates may also be used See why March 2024 Cuneiform is a logo syllabic writing system that was used to write several languages of the Ancient Near East The script was in active use from the early Bronze Age until the beginning of the Common Era Cuneiform scripts are marked by and named for the characteristic wedge shaped impressions Latin cuneus which form their signs Cuneiform is the earliest known writing system and was originally developed to write the Sumerian language of southern Mesopotamia modern Iraq CuneiformA trilingual cuneiform inscription of Xerxes I at Van Fortress in Turkey an Achaemenid royal inscription written in Old Persian Elamite and Babylonian forms of cuneiformScript typeLogographic and syllabaryTime periodc 2900 BC 2nd century ADDirectionLeft to rightRegionSumerLanguagesSumerian Akkadian Eblaite Elamite Hittite Hurrian Luwian Urartian Palaic Aramaic Old PersianRelated scriptsParent systemsProto cuneiform Proto writing CuneiformChild systemsNone influenced the shape of Ugaritic and Old Persian glyphsISO 15924ISO 15924Xsux 020 Cuneiform Sumero AkkadianUnicodeUnicode aliasCuneiformUnicode rangeU 12000 to U 123FF Cuneiform U 12400 to U 1247F Cuneiform Numbers and Punctuation This article contains phonetic transcriptions in the International Phonetic Alphabet IPA For an introductory guide on IPA symbols see Help IPA For the distinction between and see IPA Brackets and transcription delimiters This article contains cuneiform script Without proper rendering support you may see question marks boxes or other symbols instead of cuneiform script Over the course of its history cuneiform was adapted to write a number of languages in addition to Sumerian Akkadian texts are attested from the 24th century BC onward and make up the bulk of the cuneiform record Akkadian cuneiform was itself adapted to write the Hittite language in the early second millennium BC The other languages with significant cuneiform corpora are Eblaite Elamite Hurrian Luwian and Urartian The Old Persian and Ugaritic alphabets feature cuneiform style signs however they are unrelated to the cuneiform logo syllabary proper The latest known cuneiform tablet dates to 75 AD Cuneiform was rediscovered in modern times in the early 17th century with the publication of the trilingual Achaemenid royal inscriptions at Persepolis these were first deciphered in the early 19th century The modern study of cuneiform belongs to the ambiguously named field of Assyriology as the earliest excavations of cuneiform libraries in the mid 19th century were in the area of ancient Assyria An estimated half a million tablets are held in museums across the world but comparatively few of these are published The largest collections belong to the British Museum approx 130 000 tablets the Vorderasiatisches Museum Berlin the Louvre the Istanbul Archaeology Museums the National Museum of Iraq the Yale Babylonian Collection approx 40 000 tablets and Penn Museum HistoryAccounting tokensClay bulla and tokens 4000 3100 BC SusaNumerical tablet 3500 3350 BC Uruk V phase KhafajahPre cuneiform tags with drawing of goat or sheep and number probably 10 Al Hasakah 3300 3100 BC Uruk culture A table illustrating the progressive simplification of cuneiform signs from archaic vertical script to Assyrian Writing began after pottery was invented during the Neolithic when clay tokens were used to record specific amounts of livestock or commodities In recent years a contrarian view has arisen on the tokens being the precursor of writing These tokens were initially impressed on the surface of round clay envelopes clay bullae and then stored in them The tokens were then progressively replaced by flat tablets on which signs were recorded with a stylus Writing is first recorded in Uruk at the end of the 4th millennium BC and soon after in various parts of the Near East An ancient Mesopotamian poem gives the first known story of the invention of writing Because the messenger s mouth was heavy and he couldn t repeat the message the Lord of Kulaba patted some clay and put words on it like a tablet Until then there had been no putting words on clay Sumerian epic poem Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta c 1800 BC The cuneiform writing system was in use for more than three millennia through several stages of development from the 31st century BC down to the second century AD The latest firmly dateable tablet from Uruk dates to 79 80 AD Ultimately it was completely replaced by alphabetic writing in the general sense in the course of the Roman era and there are no cuneiform systems in current use It had to be deciphered as a completely unknown writing system in 19th century Assyriology It was successfully deciphered by 1857 The cuneiform script changed considerably over more than 2 000 years The image below shows the development of the sign SAฤœ head Borger nr 184 U 12295 ๐’Š• Evolution of the cuneiform sign SAG head 3000 1000 BC Stages shows the pictogram as it was drawn around 3000 BC shows the rotated pictogram as written from c 2800 2600 BC shows the abstracted glyph in archaic monumental inscriptions from c 2600 BC is the sign as written in clay contemporary with stage 3 represents the late 3rd millennium BC represents Old Assyrian ductus of the early 2nd millennium BC as adopted into Hittite is the simplified sign as written by Assyrian scribes in the early 1st millennium BC and until the script s extinction Sumerian pictographs circa 3300 BC A tablet with proto cuneiform pictographic characters end of 4th millennium BC Uruk III This is thought to be a list of slaves names the hand in the upper left corner representing the owner The cuneiform script was developed from pictographic proto writing in the late 4th millennium BC stemming from the near eastern token system used for accounting The meaning and usage of these tokens is still a matter of debate These tokens were in use from the 9th millennium BC and remained in occasional use even late in the 2nd millennium BC Early tokens with pictographic shapes of animals associated with numbers were discovered in Tell Brak and date to the mid 4th millennium BC It has been suggested that the token shapes were the original basis for some of the Sumerian pictographs The Kish tablet a limestone tablet from Kish with pictographic early cuneiform writing 3500 BC Possibly the earliest known example of writing Ashmolean Museum Mesopotamia s proto literate period spans roughly the 35th to 32nd centuries BC The first unequivocal written documents start with the Uruk IV period from circa 3 300 BC followed by tablets found in Uruk III Jemdet Nasr Early Dynastic I Ur and Susa in Proto Elamite dating to the period until circa 2 900 BC Originally pictographs were either drawn on clay tablets in vertical columns with a sharpened reed stylus or incised in stone This early style lacked the characteristic wedge shape of the strokes Most Proto Cuneiform records from this period were of an accounting nature The proto cuneiform sign list has grown as new texts are discovered and shrunk as variant signs are combined The current sign list is 705 elements long with 42 being numeric and four considered pre proto Elamite Certain signs to indicate names of gods countries cities vessels birds trees etc are known as determinatives and were the Sumerian signs of the terms in question added as a guide for the reader Proper names continued to be usually written in purely logographic fashion Archaic cuneiform c 2900 BC Early pictographic signs in archaic cuneiform used vertically before c 2300 BC The first inscribed tablets were purely pictographic which makes it technically difficult to know in which language they were written Different languages have been proposed though usually Sumerian is assumed Later tablets dating after c 2900 BC start to use syllabic elements which clearly show a language structure typical of the agglutinative Sumerian language The first tablets using syllabic elements date to the Early Dynastic I II periods c 2800 BC and they are agreed to be clearly in Sumerian This is the time when some pictographic element started to be used for their phonetic value permitting the recording of abstract ideas or personal names Many pictographs began to lose their original function and a given sign could have various meanings depending on context The sign inventory was reduced from some 1 500 signs to some 600 signs and writing became increasingly phonological Determinative signs were re introduced to avoid ambiguity Cuneiform writing proper thus arises from the more primitive system of pictographs at about that time labeled the Early Bronze Age II epoch by historians The earliest known Sumerian king whose name appears on contemporary cuneiform tablets is Enmebaragesi of Kish fl c 2600 BC Surviving records became less fragmentary for following reigns and by the arrival of Sargon it had become standard practice for each major city state to date documents by year names commemorating the exploits of its king A proto cuneiform tablet end of the 4th millennium BC A proto cuneiform tablet Jemdet Nasr period c 3100 2900 BC A proto cuneiform tablet Jemdet Nasr period c 3100 2900 BC A dog on a leash is visible in the background of the lower panel The Blau Monuments combine proto cuneiform characters and illustrations 3100 2700 BC British Museum The newly discovered Tablet V of the Epic of Gilgamesh It dates back to the old Babylonian period 2003 1595 BC and is currently housed in the Sulaymaniyah Museum Kurdistan Region Iraq Cuneiforms and hieroglyphs Geoffrey Sampson stated that Egyptian hieroglyphs came into existence a little after Sumerian script and probably were invented under the influence of the latter and that it is probable that the general idea of expressing words of a language in writing was brought to Egypt from Sumerian Mesopotamia There are many instances of Egypt Mesopotamia relations at the time of the invention of writing and standard reconstructions of the development of writing generally place the development of the Sumerian proto cuneiform script before the development of Egyptian hieroglyphs with the suggestion the former influenced the latter But given the lack of direct evidence for the transfer of writing no definitive determination has been made as to the origin of hieroglyphics in ancient Egypt Others have held that the evidence for such direct influence remains flimsy and that a very credible argument can also be made for the independent development of writing in Egypt Early Dynastic cuneiform circa 2500 BC A sumerian inscription in monumental archaic style c 26th century BC Early cuneiform inscriptions were made by using a pointed stylus sometimes called linear cuneiform Many of the early dynastic inscriptions particularly those made on stone continued to use the linear style as late as circa 2000 BC In the mid 3rd millennium BC a new wedge tipped stylus was introduced which was pushed into the clay producing wedge shaped cuneiform This development made writing quicker and easier especially when writing on soft clay By adjusting the relative position of the stylus to the tablet the writer could use a single tool to make a variety of impressions For numbers a round tipped stylus was initially used until the wedge tipped stylus was generalized The direction of writing was from top to bottom and right to left Cuneiform clay tablets could be fired in kilns to bake them hard and so provide a permanent record or they could be left moist and recycled if permanence was not needed Most surviving cuneiform tablets were of the latter kind accidentally preserved when fires destroyed the tablets storage place and effectively baked them unintentionally ensuring their longevity From linear to angularWedge tipped stylus for cuneiform writing on clay tabletsThe regnal name Lugal dalu in archaic linear script circa 2500 BC and the same name stylized with standard Sumero Akkadian cuneiform ๐’ˆ—๐’•๐’‡ป The script was widely used on commemorative stelae and carved reliefs to record the achievements of the ruler in whose honor the monument had been erected The spoken language included many homophones and near homophones and in the beginning similar sounding words such as life til and arrow ti were written with the same symbol ๐’‹พ As a result many signs gradually changed from being logograms to also functioning as syllabograms so that for example the sign for the word arrow would become the sign for the sound ti Syllabograms were used in Sumerian writing especially to express grammatical elements and their use was further developed and modified in the writing of the Akkadian language to express its sounds Often words that had a similar meaning but very different sounds were written with the same symbol For instance the Sumerian words tooth zu mouth ka and voice gu were all written with the original pictogram for mouth ๐’…— A contract for the sale of a field and a house in the wedge shaped cuneiform adapted for clay tablets Shuruppak circa 2600 BC Words that sounded alike would have different signs for instance the syllable ษกu had fourteen different symbols The inventory of signs was expanded by the combination of existing signs into compound signs They could either derive their meaning from a combination of the meanings of both original signs e g ๐’…— ka mouth and ๐’€€ a water were combined to form the sign for ๐’…˜ nag drink formally KA A cf Chinese compound ideographs or one sign could suggest the meaning and the other the pronunciation e g ๐’…— ka mouth was combined with the sign ๐’‰ฃ nun prince to express the word ๐’…ป nundum meaning lip formally KA NUN cf Chinese phono semantic compounds Another way of expressing words that had no sign of their own was by so called Diri compounds sign sequences that have in combination a reading different from the sum of the individual constituent signs for example the compound IGI A ๐’…†๐’€€ eye water has the reading imhur meaning foam Several symbols had too many meanings to permit clarity Therefore symbols were put together to indicate both the sound and the meaning of a symbol For instance the word raven UGA had the same logogram ๐’‰€ as the word soap NAGA the name of a city ERES and the patron goddess of Eresh NISABA To disambiguate and identify the word more precisely two phonetic complements were added U ๐’Œ‘ for the syllable u in front of the symbol and GA ๐’‚ต for the syllable ga behind Finally the symbol for bird MUSEN ๐’„ท was added to ensure proper interpretation As a result the whole word could be spelt ๐’Œ‘๐’‰€๐’‚ต๐’„ท i e U NAGA GAmusen among the many variant spellings that the word could have For unknown reasons cuneiform pictographs until then written vertically were rotated 90 counterclockwise in effect putting them on their side This change first occurred slightly before the Akkadian period at the time of the Uruk ruler Lugalzagesi r c 2294 2270 BC The vertical style remained for monumental purposes on stone stelas until the middle of the 2nd millennium Written Sumerian was used as a scribal language until the first century AD The spoken language died out between about 2100 and 1700 BC Sumero Akkadian cuneiform Sumero Akkadian cuneiform syllabary circa 2200 BC Left Sumero Akkadian cuneiform syllabary used by early Akkadian rulers Right Seal of Akkadian Empire ruler Naram Sin reversed for readability c 2250 BC The name of Naram Sin Akkadian ๐’€ญ๐’ˆพ๐’Š๐’„ ๐’€ญ๐’‚—๐’ช DNa ra am DSin Sin being written ๐’‚—๐’ช EN ZU appears vertically in the right column British Museum These are some of the more important signs the complete Sumero Akkadian list of characters actually numbers about 600 with many more values or pronunciation possibilities The archaic cuneiform script was adopted by the Akkadian Empire from the 23rd century BC short chronology The Akkadian language being East Semitic its structure was completely different from Sumerian The Akkadians found a practical solution in writing their language phonetically using the corresponding Sumerian phonetic signs Still many of the Sumerian characters were retained for their logographic value as well for example the character for sheep was retained but was now pronounced immerum rather than the Sumerian udu Such retained individual signs or sometimes entire sign combinations with logographic value are known as Sumerograms a type of heterogram The East Semitic languages employed equivalents for many signs that were distorted or abbreviated to represent new values because the syllabic nature of the script as refined by the Sumerians was not intuitive to Semitic speakers From the beginning of the Middle Bronze Age 20th century BC the script evolved to accommodate the various dialects of Akkadian Old Akkadian Babylonian and Assyrian At this stage the former pictograms were reduced to a high level of abstraction and were composed of only five basic wedge shapes horizontal vertical two diagonals and the Winkelhaken impressed vertically by the tip of the stylus The signs exemplary of these basic wedges are AS B001 U 12038 ๐’€ธ horizontal DIS B748 U 12079 ๐’น vertical GE23 DIS tenu B575 U 12039 ๐’€น downward diagonal GE22 B647 U 1203A ๐’€บ upward diagonal U B661 U 1230B ๐’Œ‹ the Winkelhaken 2nd millennium BC cuneiformsThe Babylonian king Hammurabi still used vertical cuneiform circa 1750 BC Babylonian tablets of the time of Hammurabi circa 1750 BC Sumero Akkadian cuneiform either in inscriptions or on clay tablets continued to be in use throughout the 2nd millennium BC Except for the Winkelhaken which has no tail the length of the wedges tails could vary as required for sign composition Signs tilted by about 45 degrees are called tenu in Akkadian thus DIS is a vertical wedge and DIS tenu a diagonal one If a sign is modified with additional wedges this is called gunu or gunification if signs are cross hatched with additional Winkelhaken they are called sesig if signs are modified by the removal of a wedge or wedges they are called nutillu Typical signs have about five to ten wedges while complex ligatures can consist of twenty or more although it is not always clear if a ligature should be considered a single sign or two collated but distinct signs the ligature KAxGUR7 consists of 31 strokes Most later adaptations of Sumerian cuneiform preserved at least some aspects of the Sumerian script Written Akkadian included phonetic symbols from the Sumerian syllabary together with logograms that were read as whole words Many signs in the script were polyvalent having both a syllabic and logographic meaning The complexity of the system bears a resemblance to Old Japanese written in a Chinese derived script where some of these Sinograms were used as logograms and others as phonetic characters This mixed method of writing continued through the end of the Babylonian and Assyrian empires although there were periods when purism was in fashion and there was a more marked tendency to spell out the words laboriously in preference to using signs with a phonetic complement clarification needed Yet even in those days the Babylonian syllabary remained a mixture of logographic and phonemic writing Elamite cuneiform Elamite cuneiform was a simplified form of the Sumero Akkadian cuneiform used to write the Elamite language in the area that corresponds to modern Iran from the 3rd millennium BC to the 4th century BC Elamite cuneiform at times competed with other local scripts Proto Elamite and Linear Elamite The earliest known Elamite cuneiform text is a treaty between Akkadians and the Elamites that dates back to 2200 BC Some believe it might have been in use since 2500 BC The tablets are poorly preserved so only limited parts can be read but it is understood that the text is a treaty between the Akkad king Naramsin and Elamite ruler Hita as indicated by frequent references like Naramsin s friend is my friend Naramsin s enemy is my enemy The most famous Elamite scriptures and the ones that ultimately led to its decipherment are the ones found in the trilingual Behistun inscriptions commissioned by the Achaemenid kings The inscriptions similar to that of the Rosetta Stone s were written in three different writing systems The first was Old Persian which was deciphered in 1802 by Georg Friedrich Grotefend The second Babylonian cuneiform was deciphered shortly after the Old Persian text Because Elamite is unlike its neighboring Semitic languages the script s decipherment was delayed until the 1840s Elamite cuneiform appears to have used far fewer signs than its Akkadian prototype and initially relied primarily on syllabograms but logograms became more common in later texts Many signs soon acquired highly distinctive local shape variants that are often difficult to recognise as related to their Akkadian prototypes Hittite cuneiform Hittite cuneiform is an adaptation of the Old Assyrian cuneiform of c 1800 BC to the Hittite language and was used from the 17th until approximately the 13th century BC More or less the same system was used by the scribes of the Hittite Empire for two other Anatolian languages namely Luwian alongside the native Anatolian hieroglyphics and Palaic as well as for the isolate Hattic language When the cuneiform script was adapted to writing Hittite a layer of Akkadian logographic spellings also known as Akkadograms was added to the script in addition to the Sumerian logograms or Sumerograms which were already inherent in the Akkadian writing system and which Hittite also kept Thus the pronunciations of many Hittite words which were conventionally written by logograms are now unknown Hurrian and Urartian cuneiform The Hurrian language attested 2300 1000 BC and Urartian language attested 9th 6th century BC were also written in adapted versions of Sumero Akkadian cuneiform Although the two languages are related their writing systems seem to have been developed separately For Hurrian there were even different systems in different polities in Mitanni in Mari in the Hittite Empire The Hurrian orthographies were generally characterised by more extensive use of syllabograms and more limited use of logograms than Akkadian Urartian in comparison retained a more significant role for logograms Neo Assyrian and Neo Babylonian cuneiform Neo Assyrian cuneiform syllabary circa 650 BC Left Simplified cuneiform syllabary in use during the Neo Assyrian period The C before and after vowels stands for Consonant Right Mesopotamian palace paving slab c 600 BC In the Iron Age c 10th to 6th centuries BC Assyrian cuneiform was further simplified The characters remained the same as those of Sumero Akkadian cuneiforms but the graphic design of each character relied more heavily on wedges and square angles making them significantly more abstract Assurbanipal King of Assyria Assur bani habal sar mat Assur KI Same characters in the classical Sumero Akkadian script of circa 2000 BC top and in the Neo Assyrian script of the Rassam cylinder 643 BC bottom The Rassam cylinder with translation of a segment about the Assyrian conquest of Egypt by Ashurbanipal against Black Pharaoh Taharqa 643 BC Babylonian cuneiform was simplified along similar lines during that period albeit to a lesser extent and in a slightly different way From the 6th century the Akkadian language was marginalized by Aramaic written in the Aramaic alphabet but Akkadian cuneiform remained in use in the literary tradition well into the times of the Parthian Empire 250 BC 226 AD The last known cuneiform inscription an astronomical text was written in 75 AD The ability to read cuneiform may have persisted until the third century AD Derived scripts Old Persian cuneiform 5th century BC Old Persian cuneiform syllabary circa 500 BC Old Persian cuneiform syllabary left and the DNa inscription part II of Darius the Great circa 490 BC in the newly created Old Persian cuneiform The complexity of cuneiforms prompted the development of a number of simplified versions of the script Old Persian cuneiform was developed with an independent and unrelated set of simple cuneiform characters by Darius the Great in the 5th century BC Most scholars consider this writing system to be an independent invention because it has no obvious connections with other writing systems at the time such as Elamite Akkadian Hurrian and Hittite cuneiforms It formed a semi alphabetic syllabary using far fewer wedge strokes than Assyrian used together with a handful of logograms for frequently occurring words like god ๐Ž king ๐‹ or country ๐Œ This almost purely alphabetical form of the cuneiform script 36 phonetic characters and 8 logograms was specially designed and used by the early Achaemenid rulers from the 6th century BC down to the 4th century BC Because of its simplicity and logical structure the Old Persian cuneiform script was the first to be deciphered by modern scholars starting with the accomplishments of Georg Friedrich Grotefend in 1802 Various ancient bilingual or trilingual inscriptions then permitted to decipher the other much more complicated and more ancient scripts as far back as to the 3rd millennium Sumerian script Ugaritic Ugaritic was written using the Ugaritic alphabet a standard Semitic style alphabet an abjad written using the cuneiform method ArchaeologyBetween half a million and two million cuneiform tablets are estimated to have been excavated in modern times of which only approximately 30 000 100 000 have been read or published The British Museum holds the largest collection approx 130 000 tablets followed by the Vorderasiatisches Museum Berlin the Louvre the Istanbul Archaeology Museums the National Museum of Iraq the Yale Babylonian Collection approx 40 000 and Penn Museum Most of these have lain in these collections for a century without being translated studied or published as there are only a few hundred qualified cuneiformists in the world DeciphermentGarcia de Silva Figueroa 1620 Pietro Della Valle 1621 The first cuneiform inscriptions published in modern times both copied from Achaemenid royal inscriptions in Persepolis in the early 17th century Pietro Della Valle s inscription today known as XPb is from the Palace of Xerxes The decipherment of cuneiform began with the decipherment of Old Persian cuneiform in 1836 The first cuneiform inscriptions published in modern times were copied from the Achaemenid royal inscriptions in the ruins of Persepolis with the first complete and accurate copy being published in 1778 by Carsten Niebuhr Niebuhr s publication was used by Grotefend in 1802 to make the first breakthrough the realization that Niebuhr had published three different languages side by side and the recognition of the word king The rediscovery and publication of cuneiform took place in the early 17th century and early conclusions were drawn such as the writing direction and that the Achaemenid royal inscriptions are three different languages with two different scripts In 1620 Garcia de Silva Figueroa dated the inscriptions of Persepolis to the Achaemenid period identified them as Old Persian and concluded that the ruins were the ancient residence of Persepolis In 1621 Pietro Della Valle specified the direction of writing from left to right In 1762 Jean Jacques Barthelemy found that an inscription in Persepolis resembled that found on a brick in Babylon Carsten Niebuhr made the first copies of the inscriptions of Persepolis in 1778 and settled on three different types of writing which subsequently became known as Niebuhr I II and III He was the first to discover the sign for a word division in one of the scriptures Oluf Gerhard Tychsen was the first to list 24 phonetic or alphabetic values for the characters in 1798 Actual decipherment did not take place until the beginning of the 19th century initiated by Georg Friedrich Grotefend in his study of Old Persian cuneiform He was followed by Antoine Jean Saint Martin in 1822 and Rasmus Christian Rask in 1823 who was the first to decipher the name Achaemenides and the consonants m and n Eugene Burnouf identified the names of various satrapies and the consonants k and z in 1833 1835 Christian Lassen contributed significantly to the grammatical understanding of the Old Persian language and the use of vowels The decipherers used the short trilingual inscriptions from Persepolis and the inscriptions from Ganjname for their work Niebuhr inscription 1 with the suggested words for King ๐Žง๐๐Ž ๐Žน๐Žฐ๐Žก๐Žน highlighted repeated three times Inscription now known to mean Darius the Great King King of Kings King of countries son of Hystaspes an Achaemenian who built this Palace Today known as DPa from the Palace of Darius in Persepolis above figures of the king and attendants Niebuhr inscription 2 with the suggested words for King ๐Žง๐๐Ž ๐Žน๐Žฐ๐Žก๐Žน highlighted repeated four times Inscription now known to mean Xerxes the Great King King of Kings son of Darius the King an Achaemenian Today known as XPe the text of fourteen inscriptions in three languages Old Persian Elamite Babylonian from the Palace of Xerxes in Persepolis In a final step the decipherment of the trilingual Behistun Inscription was completed by Henry Rawlinson and Edward Hincks Edward Hincks discovered that Old Persian is partly a syllabary In 2023 it was shown that automatic high quality translation of cuneiform languages like Akkadian can be achieved using natural language processing methods with convolutional neural networks TransliterationAn extract from the Cyrus Cylinder lines 15 21 giving the genealogy of Cyrus the Great and an account of his capture of Babylon in 539 BCThe cuneiform sign EN for Lord or Master the evolution from the pictograph of a throne circa 3000 BC followed by simplification and rotation down to circa 600 BC Cylinder of Antiochus I c 250 BC The Antiochus cylinder written by Antiochus I Soter as great king of kings of Babylon restorer of the temples E sagila and E zida circa 250 BC Written in traditional Akkadian with the same text in Babylonian and Assyrian given here for comparison Antiochus I Soter with titles in Akkadian on the cylinder of Antiochus Antiochus King Great King King of multitudes King of Babylon King of countries Note that while the images above transcribe the Akkadian pronunciation of the text the actual spelling is highly logographic and would be strictly transliterated as follows with the logograms Sumerograms capitalised and the syllabograms phonetic signs italicised 1 DISan ti สพu ku us LUGAL GAL u 2 LUGAL dan nu LUGAL SAR LUGAL E KI LUGAL KUR KUR 3 za ni in E SAG IL u E ZI DA In Unicode 1 ๐’น๐’€ญ๐’‹พ๐’€ช๐’†ช๐’Šป๐’ˆ—๐’ƒฒ๐’Œ‘ 2 ๐’ˆ—๐’†—๐’‰ก๐’ˆ—๐’Ž—๐’ˆ—๐’‚Š๐’† ๐’ˆ—๐’†ณ๐’†ณ 3 ๐’๐’‰Œ๐’…”๐’‚๐’Š•๐’…๐’…‡๐’‚๐’ฃ๐’• Cuneiform has a specific format for transliteration Because of the script s polyvalence transliteration requires certain choices of the transliterating scholar who must decide in the case of each sign which of its several possible meanings is intended in the original document For example the sign dingir ๐’€ญ in a Hittite text may represent either the Hittite syllable an or may be part of an Akkadian phrase representing the syllable il it may be a Sumerogram representing the original Sumerian meaning god or the determinative for a deity In transliteration a different rendition of the same glyph is chosen depending on its role in the present context Therefore a text containing DINGIR ๐’€ญ and A ๐’€€ in succession could be construed to represent the Akkadian words ana ila god a the accusative case ending god water or a divine name A or Water Someone transcribing the signs would make the decision how the signs should be read and assemble the signs as ana ila Ila god accusative case etc A transliteration of these signs would separate the signs with dashes il a an a DINGIR a or Da This is still easier to read than the original cuneiform but now the reader is able to trace the sounds back to the original signs and determine if the correct decision was made on how to read them A transliterated document thus presents the reading preferred by the transliterating scholar as well as an opportunity to reconstruct the original text There are differing conventions for transliterating different languages written with Sumero Akkadian cuneiform The following conventions see wide use across the different fields To disambiguate between homophones i e between signs pronounced identically the letters that express the pronunciation of a sign are supplemented with subscript numbers For example u1 stands for the glyph ๐’Œ‹ u2 stands for ๐’Œ‘ and u3 stands for ๐’…‡ all thought to have been pronounced u No 1 is usually treated as the default interpretation and not indicated explicitly so u is equivalent to u1 For the numbers 2 and 3 accent diacritics are often used as well an acute accent stands for no 2 and a grave accent for no 3 Thus u is equivalent to u1 ๐’Œ‹ u is equivalent to u2 ๐’Œ‘ and u to u3 ๐’…‡ The sequence of numbering is conventional but essentially arbitrary and a consequence of the history of decipherment As shown above signs as such are represented in capital letters The specific reading selected in the transliteration is represented in small letters Thus capital letters can be used to indicate a so called Diri compound in which a sequence of signs does not stand for a combination of their usual readings as in the spelling ๐’…†๐’€€ IGI A for the word imhur foam given above Capital letters may also be used to indicate a Sumerogram for example KU BABBAR ๐’†ฌ๐’Œ“ Sumerian for silver being used with the intended Akkadian reading kaspum silver or simply a sign sequence of whose reading the editor is uncertain Naturally the real reading if it is clear will be presented in small letters in the transliteration IGI A will be rendered as imhur4 An Akkadogram in Hittite is indicated by capital letters as well but they are italicised e g ME E transcribes the sign sequence ๐’ˆจ๐’‚Š when the intended reading is Hittite watar water based on Akkadian me water accusative genitive case Another convention is that determinatives are written in superscript thus the sequence ๐’€•๐’†  the name of the city Uruk is transliterated as unugki to show that the second sign KI meaning earth isn t intended to be pronounced but only specifies the type of meaning the former sign has In this case that it is a place name A few common determinatives are transliterated with abbreviations for example d represents the sign ๐’€ญ DINGIR when it serves as an indicator that one or more following signs form the name of a deity as seen in the transliteration of ๐’€ญ๐’‚—๐’†ค as den lil Enlil ๐’น DIS one and ๐’Šฉ MUNUS woman as prefixed determinatives for male and female personal names uncommon in Sumerian but subsequently used for some other languages are often rendered with the abbreviations m and f for masculine and feminine In Sumerian transliteration a multiplication sign is used to indicate typographic ligatures For example the sign ๐’…ป NUNDUM which stands for the word nundum lip can also be designated as KA NUN which indicates that it is a compound of the signs ๐’…— KA mouth and ๐’‰ฃ NUN prince Since the Sumerian language has only been widely known and studied by scholars for approximately a century changes in the accepted reading of Sumerian names have occurred from time to time Thus the name of a king of Ur ๐’Œจ๐’€ญ๐’‡‰ read Ur Bau at one time citation needed was later read as Ur Engur and is now read as Ur Nammu or Ur Namma for Lugal zage si ๐’ˆ—๐’ ๐’„€๐’‹› a king of Uruk some scholars continued to read Ungal zaggisi and so forth With some names of the older period there was often uncertainty whether their bearers were Sumerians or Semites If the former then their names could be assumed to be read as Sumerian If they were Semites the signs for writing their names were probably to be read according to their Semitic equivalents Though occasionally Semites might be encountered bearing genuine Sumerian names There was doubt whether the signs composing a Semite s name represented a phonetic reading or a logographic compound Thus e g when inscriptions of a Semitic ruler of Kish whose name was written ๐’Œท๐’ˆฌ๐’‘ Uru mu ush were first deciphered that name was first taken to be logographic because uru mu ush could be read as he founded a city in Sumerian and scholars accordingly retranslated it back to the original Semitic as Alu usharshid It was later recognized that the URU sign ๐’Œท can also be read as ri and that the name is that of the Akkadian king Rimush Sign inventoriesCuneiform writing in Ur southern Iraq The Sumerian cuneiform script had on the order of 1 000 distinct signs or about 1 500 if variants are included This number was reduced to about 600 by the 24th century BC and the beginning of Akkadian records Not all Sumerian signs are used in Akkadian texts and not all Akkadian signs are used in Hittite A Falkenstein 1936 lists 939 signs used in the earliest period late Uruk 34th to 31st centuries See Bibliography for the works mentioned in this paragraph With an emphasis on Sumerian forms Deimel 1922 lists 870 signs used in the Early Dynastic II period 28th century Liste der archaischen Keilschriftzeichen or LAK and for the Early Dynastic IIIa period 26th century Sumerisches Lexikon or SL Rosengarten 1967 lists 468 signs used in Sumerian pre Sargonian Lagash Mittermayer and Attinger 2006 Altbabylonische Zeichenliste der Sumerisch Literarischen Texte or aBZL list 480 Sumerian forms written in Isin Larsa and Old Babylonian times Regarding Akkadian forms the standard handbook for many years was Borger 1981 Assyrisch Babylonische Zeichenliste or ABZ with 598 signs used in Assyrian Babylonian writing recently superseded by Borger 2004 Mesopotamisches Zeichenlexikon or MesZL with an expansion to 907 signs an extension of their Sumerian readings and a new numbering scheme Signs used in Hittite cuneiform are listed by Forrer 1922 Friedrich 1960 and Ruster and Neu 1989 Hethitisches Zeichenlexikon or HZL The HZL lists a total of 375 signs many with variants for example 12 variants are given for number 123 EGIR Syllabary The tables below contain the transliteration schemes of Sumero Akkadian syllabograms Akkadian V and VV syllabic glyphs Va Ve Vi Vu aV eV iV uVa ๐’€€ a a ๐’€‰ a a ๐’‰ฟ a ๐’€€๐’€ญ a ๐’€ a ๐’Œ‹ a ๐’„ฉ a ๐’Œจ a ๐’†น a ๐’Šท a ๐’€ญ a ๐’Œ“ a ๐’Œ— a ๐’‚ e ๐’‚Š e e ๐’‚ e e ๐’Œ“๐’บ e ๐’€€ e ๐’Šฉ๐’Œ† e ๐’‹ฃ e ๐’…— e ๐’Œ“ e ๐’‰„ e ๐’‡ฏ๐’บ e ๐’‡ฏ๐’ฝ e ๐’Šฉ๐’†ช i ๐’„ฟ i i i i ๐’‰Œ i ๐’‰Œ๐’Œ“ i ๐’…— i ๐’†ช i ๐’€€๐’‡‰ i ๐’‡‰ i ๐’‹–๐’„‘๐’†ช i ๐’Œ“๐’บ i ๐’„ญ i ๐’ˆฌ i ๐’‚Š i ๐’‰ฟ u ๐’Œ‹ u u ๐’Œ‘ u u ๐’…‡ u ๐’Œ“ u ๐’„ท๐’‹› u ๐’…†๐’‚ u ๐’† ๐’ˆซ u ๐’‡‡ u ๐’‚ฆ u ๐’ฑ u ๐’„ท u ๐’Œฆ u ๐’„ด u ๐’Œ‹๐’‚ต u ๐’Œ u ๐’‰ฟ u ๐’‡ u ๐’Œท u ๐’Šบ u ๐’ŠŒ u ๐’Œ— u ๐’‰ก a ๐’€€ a a ๐’€‰ a a ๐’‰ฟ a ๐’€€๐’€ญ a ๐’€ a ๐’Œ‹ a ๐’„ฉ a ๐’Œจ a ๐’†น a ๐’Šท a ๐’€ญ a ๐’Œ“ a ๐’Œ— a ๐’‚ e ๐’‚Š e e ๐’‚ e e ๐’Œ“๐’บ e ๐’€€ e ๐’Šฉ๐’Œ† e ๐’‹ฃ e ๐’…— e ๐’Œ“ e ๐’‰„ e ๐’‡ฏ๐’บ e ๐’‡ฏ๐’ฝ e ๐’Šฉ๐’†ช i ๐’„ฟ i i i i ๐’‰Œ i ๐’‰Œ๐’Œ“ i ๐’…— i ๐’†ช i ๐’€€๐’‡‰ i ๐’‡‰ i ๐’‹–๐’„‘๐’†ช i ๐’Œ“๐’บ i ๐’„ญ i ๐’ˆฌ i ๐’‚Š i ๐’‰ฟ u ๐’Œ‹ u u ๐’Œ‘ u u ๐’…‡ u ๐’Œ“ u ๐’„ท๐’‹› u ๐’…†๐’‚ u ๐’† ๐’ˆซ u ๐’‡‡ u ๐’‚ฆ u ๐’ฑ u ๐’„ท u ๐’Œฆ u ๐’„ด u ๐’Œ‹๐’‚ต u ๐’Œ u ๐’‰ฟ u ๐’‡ u ๐’Œท u ๐’Šบ u ๐’ŠŒ u ๐’Œ— u ๐’‰กa ai ๐’€€๐’€€ ea ๐’€€ ia ๐’…€ ia ia ia ia ๐’‰Œ ia ๐’‰Œ๐’Œ“ ia ๐’ˆฌ ia ia ๐’‰ฟ ia ๐’€ผ๐’‹ฐ ia ๐’€€ ua ๐’‡‡ ua ua ๐’ฑ ua ๐’ฆ ae ea ๐’€€ ie ๐’…€ ei ia ๐’…€ ia ia ia ia ๐’‰Œ ia ๐’‰Œ๐’Œ“ ia ๐’ˆฌ ia ia ๐’‰ฟ ia ๐’€ผ๐’‹ฐ ia ๐’€€ ie ๐’…€ ii ๐’…€ ii ii ๐’‚Š iu ๐’…€ iu iu ๐’‰ฟ ai ๐’€€๐’€€ ii ๐’…€ ii ii ๐’‚Š iu ua ๐’‡‡ ua ua ๐’ฑ ua ๐’ฆ iu ๐’…€ iu iu ๐’‰ฟ uAkkadian CV and VC syllabic glyphs Ca Ce Ci Cu aC eC iC uCสพ สพa ๐’€ช สพa สพa ๐’„ด สพa สพa ๐’‚ สพa ๐’„ฉ สพa ๐’‰Œ สพe ๐’€ช สพe สพe ๐’„ด สพi ๐’€ช สพi สพi ๐’„ด สพi สพi ๐’„ญ สพu ๐’€ช สพu สพu ๐’„ด สพu สพu ๐’‡‡ สพu ๐’€€ สพu ๐’„ท aสพ ๐’€ช aสพ aสพ ๐’„ด aสพ aสพ ๐’‚ eสพ ๐’€ช eสพ eสพ ๐’„ด eสพ eสพ ๐’‚ iสพ ๐’€ช iสพ iสพ ๐’„ด uสพ ๐’€ช uสพ uสพ ๐’„ด uสพ uสพ ๐’‡‡ u สพ ๐’Œ” สพb ba ๐’€ ba ba ๐’‰บ ba ba ๐’Œ ba ๐’‚ท ba ๐’…ฎ ba ๐’Œ‘ ba ๐’ˆฆ ba ๐’‚ฆ ba ๐’ ba ๐’‰ผ ba ๐’…ค ba ๐’ˆจ ba ๐’‰ฝ ba ๐’‡ be ๐’ be be ๐’‰ be be ๐’‰Œ be ๐’€ be ๐’†ช be ๐’‰ฟ be ๐’‰ˆ bi ๐’‰ bi bi ๐’‰ˆ bi bi ๐’‰ฟ bi ๐’๐’ bi ๐’‰‹ bi ๐’€ bi ๐’†ช bi ๐’„ด bu ๐’ bu bu ๐’†œ bu bu ๐’…ค bu ๐’‡ฅ bu ๐’‡ง ๐’‡ฅ bu ๐’†ช bu ๐’” bu ๐’‘ bu ๐’‰ฝ๐’‰ฝ bu ๐’Œ‘ bu ๐’Œ‹ bu ๐’…ฎ bu ๐’‡ก bu ๐’‰ป bu ๐’‰Œ bu ๐’…— ab ๐’€Š ab ab ๐’€– ab ab ๐’€œ ab ๐’€” eb ๐’… eb eb ๐’Œˆ ib ๐’… ib ib ๐’Œˆ ub ๐’Œ’ ub ub ๐’‚  ub ub ๐’€š ub ๐’‡ฅ ub ๐’€› ๐’€š ub ๐’€™ bd da ๐’• da da ๐’‹ซ da da ๐’†• da ๐’ฎ da ๐’ da ๐’‹ณ da ๐’Œ“ da ๐’– da ๐’Œฃ da ๐’„ญ da ๐’…… da ๐’…— da ๐’‹บ de ๐’ฒ de de ๐’Œฃ de de ๐’‰ˆ de ๐’‹ผ de ๐’Š‘ de ๐’บ de ๐’Šน de ๐’‹พ di ๐’ฒ di di ๐’Šน di di ๐’‹พ di ๐’Œ‰ di ๐’Š‘ di ๐’บ di ๐’‰ˆ di ๐’Œฃ di ๐’ด di ๐’‹ผ du ๐’บ du du ๐’Œ… du du ๐’†• du ๐’Œˆ du ๐’‚… du ๐’‡ฏ du ๐’ŒŒ du ๐’ƒฎ ๐’‚ƒ du ๐’” du ๐’„ญ du ๐’…— du ๐’Œ‡ du ๐’Œ‰ du ๐’‡ฝ๐’‰ˆ ๐’ˆŒ du ๐’„ญ๐’ ๐’„ฐ du ๐’Œš du ๐’‰ˆ du ๐’Œฃ du ๐’• du ๐’‚„ du ๐’€ฒ๐’€ด du ๐’‹›๐’€€ ad ๐’€œ ad ad ๐’„‰ ad ad ๐’‡ผ ad ๐’ž ad ๐’Œ‘๐’„‰ ad ๐’‡ฝ๐’ ๐’‡ฟ ๐’ˆ• ed ๐’€‰ ed ed ๐’Œ“๐’บ ed ed ๐’‡ฏ๐’บ ed ๐’‡ฏ๐’ฝ id ๐’€‰ id id ๐’€€๐’‡‰ id id ๐’‡‰ id ๐’Œ“๐’€ญ๐’‹€๐’†  id ๐’€€ id ๐’€€๐’‡‰๐’ƒฒ id ๐’€€๐’‡‰๐’ฒ id ๐’Œ— id ๐’Œ—๐’€ญ๐’‹€๐’†  ud ๐’Œ“ ud ud ๐’€พ ud ๐’‹ธ ud ๐’š ud ๐’Œ‹๐’‚ต dg ga ๐’‚ต ga ga ๐’‚ท ga ga ๐’ƒท ga ๐’ƒป ga ๐’‹ก ga ๐’… ga ๐’…… ga ๐’„„ ga ๐’„ฏ ga ๐’ˆช ga ๐’…— ga ๐’ƒฎ ge ๐’„€ ge ge ๐’†ค ge ge ๐’น ge ๐’„„ ge ๐’†  ge ๐’ˆช ge ๐’‚  ge ๐’‰ˆ ge ๐’‰‹ ge ๐’‚… ge ๐’Šฉ๐’†ณ ge ๐’บ ge ๐’Œ‹ ge ๐’€ธ ge ๐’„ƒ ge ๐’ˆช๐’‰ญ ge ๐’ถ ge ๐’‹๐’‹™๐’ท ๐’‰พ ge ๐’‚ต ge ๐’†ณ ge ๐’ป ge ๐’€น ge ๐’€ต ge ๐’‚ท ge ๐’จ gi ๐’„€ gi gi ๐’†ค gi gi ๐’น gi ๐’„„ gi ๐’†  gi ๐’ˆช gi ๐’‚  gi ๐’…† gi ๐’‰ˆ gi ๐’‰‹ gi ๐’‚… gi ๐’Šฉ๐’†ณ gi ๐’„ƒ gi ๐’ˆช๐’‰ญ gi ๐’ถ gi ๐’‚‚ gi ๐’ gu ๐’„– gu gu ๐’„˜ gu gu ๐’…— gu ๐’„ž gu ๐’†ช gu ๐’…˜ gu ๐’…ฅ gu ๐’„ฃ gu ๐’†ฐ gu ๐’ˆฌ gu ๐’‚ต gu ๐’„ฏ gu ๐’†  gu ๐’ˆ gu ๐’† ag ๐’€ ag ag ๐’‰˜ ag ag ๐’‹ƒ eg ๐’…… eg eg ๐’‚Š eb eg ๐’‰˜ ig ๐’…… ig ig ๐’‚Š ig ig ๐’‰˜ ug ๐’ŠŒ ug ug ๐’„Š ๐’ŠŠ ug ug ๐’Œฆ ug ๐’Œ“ ug ๐’‚ฆ ug ๐’ ug ๐’ˆ• gแธซ แธซa ๐’„ฉ แธซa แธซa ๐’„ญ๐’€€ แธซa แธซa ๐’Œ‹ แธซa ๐’„ญ แธซa ๐’Œ“ แธซa ๐’„ซ แธซa ๐’‹–๐’„‘ แธซe ๐’„ญ แธซe แธซe ๐’ƒถ แธซi ๐’„ญ แธซi แธซi ๐’ƒถ แธซu ๐’„ท แธซu แธซu ๐’†ญ แธซu แธซu ๐’Œ‹ แธซu ๐’„ฏ แธซu ๐’ˆ aแธซ ๐’„ด aแธซ aแธซ ๐’‹€ aแธซ aแธซ ๐’Œ“ aแธซ ๐’€ช aแธซ ๐’€‰ aแธซ ๐’Œ” eแธซ ๐’„ด eแธซ eแธซ ๐’€ช eแธซ eแธซ ๐’†ช๐’†ช iแธซ ๐’„ด iแธซ iแธซ ๐’€ช uแธซ ๐’„ด uแธซ uแธซ ๐’Œ” uแธซ uแธซ ๐’†ต uแธซ ๐’…œ uแธซ ๐’€ช uแธซ ๐’…Ž๐’‹™ uแธซ ๐’Œ‹๐’†• แธซk ka ๐’…— ka ka ๐’† ka ka ๐’‚ต ka ๐’‹ก ka ๐’ˆœ ka ๐’‹๐’‹™๐’ท ๐’‰พ ka ๐’ฝ ka ๐’‰ ka ๐’‹ƒ ka ๐’ˆœ๐’€€ ka ๐’‹ผ๐’€€ ka ๐’„ฐ ๐’„ฐ ka ๐’ช ka ๐’†• ka ๐’ƒถ ke ๐’†  ke ke ๐’„€ ke ke ๐’€ ke ๐’†ค ki ๐’†  ki ki ๐’„€ ki ki ๐’€ ki ๐’†ค ki ๐’ช ki ๐’†• ki ๐’„„ ku ๐’†ช ku ku ๐’…ฅ ku ku ๐’†ฌ ku ๐’†ญ ku ๐’‹ป ku ๐’„ฉ ku ๐’†ฏ ku ๐’„– ku ๐’†ฐ ku ๐’ˆช ku ๐’†  ku ๐’„ฃ ku ๐’†ฒ ku ๐’„ž ku ๐’‰ˆ ku ๐’„ซ ak ๐’€ ak ak ๐’‹ƒ ek ๐’…… ik ๐’…… uk ๐’ŠŒ kl la ๐’†ท la la ๐’‡ฒ la la ๐’‰ก la ๐’บ๐’บ la ๐’‡ณ la ๐’†— la ๐’Œ“ la ๐’‚” la ๐’‹ƒ la ๐’‡ด le ๐’‡ท le le ๐’‰Œ le le ๐’…† le ๐’€ญ le ๐’€– le ๐’‰ˆ le ๐’• li ๐’‡ท li li ๐’‰Œ li li ๐’…† li ๐’Šญ li ๐’ƒถ li ๐’Œจ li ๐’€– li ๐’‰ˆ li ๐’‰ฃ li ๐’‡บ li ๐’‰‹ lu ๐’‡ป lu lu ๐’‡ฝ lu lu ๐’ˆ– lu ๐’ˆ lu ๐’ˆœ lu ๐’Œจ lu ๐’‡ lu ๐’Œท lu ๐’‰บ al ๐’€  al al ๐’€ฉ al al ๐’ƒท al ๐’Œ“ al ๐’ˆค al ๐’Œท al ๐’…‹ el ๐’‚– el el ๐’…‹ el el ๐’€ญ el ๐’…Œ il ๐’…‹ il il ๐’… il il ๐’€ญ il ๐’น il ๐’‚– il ๐’€ง il ๐’…Œ il ๐’‡ธ il ๐’€  ๐’…‹ ul ๐’ŒŒ ul ul ๐’‰ก ul ul ๐’‰ ul ๐’„‰ ul ๐’‚ฌ ul ๐’Œ“ ul ๐’‹—๐’ ul ๐’ƒท lm ma ๐’ˆ  ma ma ๐’ˆฃ ma ma ๐’‚ท ma ๐’Šฌ ma ๐’…ก ma ๐’ˆจ ma ๐’ˆฆ ma ๐’…ฟ ma ๐’‰ฟ ma ๐’Ž™ me ๐’ˆจ me me ๐’ˆช me me ๐’…  ๐’€ž me ๐’ me ๐’€€ me ๐’€ me ๐’ƒ™ me ๐’‰ฟ me ๐’‡ž me ๐’…Ž me ๐’€Ÿ mi ๐’ˆช mi mi ๐’Šฉ mi mi ๐’ˆจ mi ๐’ƒž mi ๐’‰ฟ mu ๐’ˆฌ mu mu ๐’Šฌ mu mu ๐’…ก mu ๐’Œ† mu ๐’‰Œ mu ๐’‰บ mu ๐’…ฒ mu ๐’ƒป mu ๐’„‘ mu ๐’Šฉ mu ๐’…ฟ mu ๐’„ท๐’„ญ mu ๐’†€ mu ๐’€€ am ๐’„  am am ๐’‰˜ am am ๐’€€๐’€ญ am ๐’ƒ˜ am ๐’ƒฃ am ๐’€ญ am ๐’‰ฟ em ๐’…Ž em em ๐’‰˜ em ๐’…ด im ๐’…Ž im im ๐’ฝ im im ๐’‰˜ im ๐’ผ im ๐’บ im ๐’…–๐’€€๐’‹ค um ๐’Œ um um ๐’Œ“ mn na ๐’ˆพ na na ๐’ˆฟ na na ๐’€ na ๐’‰Œ๐’Œ“ na ๐’Šญ na ๐’‡ฝ na ๐’‰† na ๐’…˜ ne ๐’‰ˆ ne ne ๐’‰Œ ne ne ๐’„Š ๐’ŠŠ ne ๐’‹™๐’‰ˆ ne ๐’† ๐’‰ˆ ne ๐’ˆพ ne ๐’ˆฟ ne ๐’‰‹ ni ๐’‰Œ ni ni ๐’…Ž ni ni ๐’ƒป ni ๐’Šฉ๐’Œ† ni ๐’‰ˆ ni ๐’†ธ๐’†ธ ni ๐’‰ ni ๐’‡ท ni ๐’Œ‹๐’Œ“๐’†ค ni ๐’†ธ nu ๐’‰ก nu nu ๐’ˆฟ nu nu ๐’‰ nu ๐’ˆ nu ๐’†ฐ nu ๐’‰ฃ nu ๐’€• nu ๐’ˆพ nu ๐’‡ท nu ๐’†ช nu ๐’‹“ nu ๐’‡ป ๐’ณ nu ๐’„ด an ๐’€ญ an an ๐’„’ en ๐’‚— en en ๐’‹™๐’€ญ ๐’Œ‹๐’€ญ en en ๐’‡ท en ๐’…— en ๐’‰บ๐’‹ผ en ๐’…” en ๐’  en ๐’Šญ in ๐’…” in ๐’‚— in ๐’Šฉ๐’Œ† in ๐’€ธ un ๐’Œฆ un un ๐’Œ‹ un un ๐’‚ฆ un ๐’‚ฌ un ๐’Œ“ np pa ๐’‰บ pa pa ๐’€ pa pa ๐’…†๐’Š’ pa ๐’‰ฝ pa ๐’‰ฝ๐’‚Š pa ๐’‰ฝ๐’…– pa ๐’„ท pa ๐’‹ƒ pa ๐’Šท pa ๐’…† pa ๐’ƒถ pa ๐’‰ฟ pe ๐’‰ฟ pe pe ๐’‰ pe pe ๐’ pe ๐’…— pe ๐’‰ˆ pi ๐’‰ฟ pi pi ๐’‰ pi pi ๐’ pi ๐’…— pi ๐’‰ˆ pi ๐’‰‹ pi ๐’‚บ pi ๐’ pu ๐’ pu pu ๐’‡ฅ pu pu ๐’…ค pu ๐’…ค pu ๐’‡€ pu ๐’Œ‘ ap ๐’€Š ap ap ๐’€– ap ap ๐’€œ ep ๐’… ep ep ๐’Œˆ ip ๐’… ip ip ๐’Œˆ up ๐’Œ’ up up ๐’‚  pq qa ๐’‹ก qa qa ๐’‚ต qa qa ๐’…— qa ๐’‹—๐’ˆซ qa ๐’†• qe ๐’†ฅ qe qe ๐’†  qe qe ๐’„€ qe ๐’„„ qi ๐’†ฅ qi qi ๐’†  qi qi ๐’„€ qi ๐’„„ qi ๐’†ค qi ๐’†• qu ๐’„ฃ qu ๐’†ช qu ๐’„– qu ๐’†ฌ qu ๐’„˜ qu ๐’„ž aq ๐’€ eq ๐’…… iq ๐’…… uq ๐’ŠŒ uq ๐’‚ฆ qr ra ๐’Š ra ra ๐’บ ra ra ๐’Œ“ ra ๐’‹ฅ ra ๐’ ra ๐’€ re ๐’Š‘ re re ๐’Œท re re ๐’†ธ re ๐’บ re ๐’ป re ๐’†• ri ๐’Š‘ ri ri ๐’Œท ri ri ๐’†ธ ri ๐’ฎ ri ๐’‰ช ri ๐’บ ri ๐’ˆถ ri ๐’ˆ• ๐’ˆ—๐’†š ri ๐’‚” ri ๐’†• ru ๐’Š’ ru ru ๐’†• ru ru ๐’€ธ ru ๐’ ru ๐’ŒŒ ru ๐’‚” ru ๐’Œจ ru ๐’‹ญ ru ๐’Œท ru ๐’‹ฝ ru ๐’Œพ ru ๐’‚— ru ๐’‚˜ ar ๐’…ˆ ar ar ๐’Œ’ ar ar ๐’„ฏ ar ๐’ƒต er ๐’…• er er ๐’€€๐’…† er er ๐’€ด er ๐’Œท er ๐’€… er ๐’บ er ๐’ˆ ir ๐’…• ir ir ๐’€€๐’…† ir ir ๐’€ด ir ๐’Œท ir ๐’„ฏ ir ๐’€… ir ๐’†œ ir ๐’„Š ir ๐’บ ir ๐’€ต ir ๐’…• ir ๐’‚† ur ๐’Œจ ur ur ๐’Œซ ur ur ๐’ƒก ur ๐’Œด ur ๐’„ฏ ur ๐’ŒŒ ur ๐’‰ž ur ๐’Œฒ ur ๐’Œต ur ๐’€ณ ur ๐’‹ฝ ur ๐’Š๐’ƒฒ ur ๐’ƒฃ rs sa ๐’Š“ sa sa ๐’ฒ sa sa ๐’ sa ๐’„ท๐’ˆฟ ๐’„ท๐’„ญ๐’ˆฟ sa ๐’‹›๐’€€ sa ๐’Šท sa ๐’…Š sa ๐’€ญ sa ๐’ˆฆ sa ๐’‰› sa ๐’‹œ sa ๐’Š• sa ๐’…†๐’‚Ÿ sa ๐’†— sa ๐’ƒป sa ๐’Œ“ sa ๐’‹™๐’‰€ sa ๐’‰ sa ๐’Šฎ sa ๐’Šญ sa ๐’Šพ se ๐’‹› se se ๐’ฃ se se ๐’‹ง se ๐’ˆป se ๐’๐’ˆน๐’ฒ se ๐’‹ se ๐’…Š se ๐’ข se ๐’ˆบ ๐’€€๐’ˆน se ๐’ˆน๐’ฒ se ๐’€€๐’ˆน๐’ฒ se ๐’ˆน se ๐’ˆฝ si ๐’‹› si si ๐’ฃ si si ๐’‹ง si ๐’‹œ si ๐’…†๐’‚  si ๐’‡ป si ๐’Œฃ si ๐’ฒ si ๐’‹ si ๐’…Š si ๐’‰† si ๐’‚ si ๐’Šฌ si ๐’‹ si ๐’…† si ๐’…ฒ ๐’… si ๐’†‰ si ๐’ข si ๐’†— si ๐’„€ ๐’†ฌ si ๐’„ข su ๐’‹ข su su ๐’ช su su ๐’‹ค su ๐’‹œ su ๐’†ช su ๐’…พ su ๐’‡ญ su ๐’ป su ๐’‹œ๐’€€ su ๐’ˆฝ su ๐’…— su ๐’‹ง ๐’‹› su ๐’ su ๐’ฎ su ๐’‰ su ๐’” su ๐’‚„ su ๐’‚… su ๐’บ๐’บ su ๐’‹† as ๐’Š as as ๐’€พ as as ๐’€ธ as ๐’†น as ๐’‹“ as ๐’„ฑ es ๐’„‘ es es ๐’Œ es es ๐’€Š es ๐’…– is ๐’„‘ is is ๐’…– is is ๐’€Š is ๐’Œ us ๐’Šป us us ๐’‘ us us ๐’š us ๐’Š us ๐’‡‡ sแนฃ แนฃa ๐’ แนฃa แนฃa ๐’€ญ แนฃe ๐’ข แนฃe แนฃe ๐’ฃ แนฃi ๐’ข แนฃi แนฃi ๐’ฃ แนฃi แนฃi ๐’‹› แนฃi ๐’‚  แนฃu ๐’ฎ แนฃu แนฃu ๐’ช aแนฃ ๐’Š aแนฃ aแนฃ ๐’€พ aแนฃ aแนฃ ๐’€ธ eแนฃ ๐’„‘ eแนฃ eแนฃ ๐’€Š iแนฃ ๐’„‘ iแนฃ iแนฃ ๐’…– iแนฃ iแนฃ ๐’€Š uแนฃ ๐’Šป uแนฃ uแนฃ ๐’‘ uแนฃ ๐’Š แนฃs sa ๐’Š“ sa sa ๐’ฒ se ๐’‹› se se ๐’‹ si ๐’‹› si si ๐’‹œ si si ๐’‹ su ๐’‹ข su su ๐’‹œ su su ๐’‹ค as ๐’€พ is ๐’…– is ๐’€Š us ๐’‘ ss sa ๐’Šญ sa sa ๐’ƒป sa sa ๐’Šฎ sa ๐’บ sa ๐’€ sa ๐’Šท sa ๐’Š‘ sa ๐’Šฌ sa ๐’„ฃ sa ๐’Š“ sa ๐’‡ฝ sa ๐’Šฉ sa ๐’Šน sa ๐’‚ท sa ๐’…†๐’‚Ÿ sa ๐’‚  sa ๐’…‡ sa ๐’‰ sa ๐’„ท๐’ˆฟ ๐’„ท๐’„ญ๐’ˆฟ sa ๐’ˆ sa ๐’Š• sa ๐’Œ‘ se ๐’Šบ se se ๐’‹› se se ๐’‚  se ๐’ˆป se ๐’๐’ˆน๐’ฒ se ๐’‰ˆ se ๐’€€๐’€ญ se ๐’‹ se ๐’‹™๐’€ญ ๐’Œ‹๐’€ญ ๐’‡๐’€ญ se ๐’†ช se ๐’ˆœ se ๐’ˆบ ๐’€€๐’ˆน se ๐’บ se ๐’‹ƒ se ๐’Œ se ๐’‹€ se ๐’ˆน๐’ฒ se ๐’€€๐’ˆน๐’ฒ se ๐’‹ง se ๐’…† ๐’‚  se ๐’„ท๐’ˆฟ se ๐’‚ž se ๐’ˆน se ๐’ˆฝ se ๐’†‚ se ๐’… se ๐’‹ž se ๐’…— se ๐’ˆ‚ ๐’‡ฝ๐’ƒธ si ๐’…† si si ๐’‹› si si ๐’‹ si ๐’‚  si ๐’†ช si ๐’‹† si ๐’…Š su ๐’‹— su su ๐’‹™ su su ๐’‚  su ๐’Œ‹ su ๐’‡Ÿ su ๐’‡  su ๐’ƒป su ๐’ˆฌ su ๐’‹ข su ๐’†ƒ su ๐’‰ su ๐’‹ณ su ๐’ฎ su ๐’Œ‹๐’Œ“ as ๐’€ธ as as ๐’€พ as as as as ๐’‹๐’‹ฆ as ๐’‹ ๐’€Š as ๐’‹“ as ๐’„ฑ as as ๐’น as ๐’€น es ๐’Œ es es ๐’‚  es es ๐’€Š es ๐’น es es es es ๐’†œ es ๐’€€๐’…† es ๐’€€ es ๐’Š‘ es ๐’‰Š es ๐’‰‰ es ๐’…– es es ๐’ˆจ๐’Œ es ๐’€น es ๐’„‘ es ๐’€ธ es es ๐’‡ต es ๐’€ผ is ๐’…– is is ๐’†œ is is ๐’Œ๐’Œ is ๐’น is ๐’…— is ๐’„‘ is ๐’€Š is ๐’€น is ๐’‚  is ๐’‘ is ๐’‡ต is ๐’‡ด us ๐’‘ us us ๐’ us us ๐’ƒฃ us ๐’Œ† us ๐’‰ฆ us ๐’‰ฅ us ๐’…ฒ us ๐’€ณ us ๐’Šป us ๐’…œ us ๐’…œ us ๐’‹›๐’€€ us ๐’„ฎ us ๐’Œ us ๐’„‘ st ta ๐’‹ซ ta ta ๐’• ta ta ๐’‹ณ ta ๐’ฎ ta ๐’Œ“ ta ๐’‹บ ta ๐’‰ฟ ta ๐’„ญ te ๐’‹ผ te te ๐’Šน te te ๐’‰ te ๐’‰ˆ te ๐’Œ† te ๐’‹ƒ te ๐’€‰ te ๐’‹พ te ๐’ฒ te ๐’‰ฟ ti ๐’‹พ ti ti ๐’Šน ti ti ๐’ด ti ๐’ฒ ti ๐’ ti ๐’‹ผ ti ๐’€‰ ti ๐’‰ˆ ti ๐’Œ— tu ๐’Œ… tu tu ๐’Œ“ tu tu ๐’บ tu ๐’Œˆ tu ๐’‹—๐’‰€ tu ๐’…ฒ tu ๐’„ฐ ๐’„ฐ tu ๐’‰ tu ๐’Œ† tu ๐’„ฝ tu ๐’„ธ tu ๐’Œ‡ tu ๐’‡ง tu ๐’‹ƒ tu ๐’…Ž tu ๐’‚€ tu ๐’€€๐’‹—๐’‰€ tu ๐’‚… tu ๐’Œ‰ tu ๐’†• tu ๐’‡ฏ tu ๐’‰€ tu ๐’‰‚ tu ๐’‚ƒ ๐’ƒฎ tu ๐’‰ at ๐’€œ at at ๐’„‰ at ๐’‡ฝ๐’ ๐’‡ฟ et ๐’€‰ it ๐’€‰ it it ๐’€€๐’‡‰ it ๐’Œ“๐’€ญ๐’‹€๐’†  it ๐’Œ—๐’€ญ๐’‹€๐’†  ut ๐’Œ“ ut ut ๐’€พ ut ๐’‹ธ ๐’‹ณ๐’Œ† ut ๐’š ut ๐’Œ‹๐’‚ต tแนญ แนญa ๐’• แนญa แนญa ๐’‹ซ แนญa แนญa ๐’„ญ แนญa ๐’ฎ แนญe ๐’ฒ แนญe แนญe ๐’Šน แนญe แนญe ๐’‰ˆ แนญe ๐’‹ผ แนญe ๐’Œฃ แนญe ๐’‹พ แนญi ๐’ฒ แนญi แนญi ๐’Šน แนญi แนญi ๐’‹พ แนญi ๐’‹ผ แนญi ๐’‰ˆ แนญi ๐’‰ฟ แนญu ๐’‚… แนญu แนญu ๐’Œ… แนญu แนญu ๐’บ แนญu ๐’Œˆ แนญu ๐’‚ƒ แนญu ๐’…— aแนญ ๐’€œ aแนญ aแนญ ๐’„‰ eแนญ ๐’€‰ iแนญ ๐’€‰ uแนญ ๐’Œ“ แนญw wa ๐’‰ฟ wa wa ๐’€ wa wa ๐’Œ‘ wa ๐’Š€ wa ๐’ˆ  we ๐’‰ฟ we we ๐’Š„ wi ๐’‰ฟ wi wi ๐’Š… wi ๐’ˆช wi ๐’ƒพ wu ๐’‰ฟ wu wu ๐’Š‡ wu wu ๐’Šˆ wu ๐’ˆฌ aw ๐’‰ฟ ew ๐’‰ฟ iw ๐’‰ฟ uw ๐’‰ฟ wy j ya ja ๐’‰ฟ ye je ๐’‰ฟ yi ji ๐’‰ฟ yi ji yi ji ๐’…€ yi ji yi ji ๐’‚Š yu ju ๐’‰ฟ ay aj ๐’€€๐’€€ y j z za ๐’ za za ๐’‰Œ๐’Œ“ za za ๐’  za ๐’‰ฃ za ๐’€ญ ze ๐’ฃ ze ze ๐’ข ze ze ๐’‚  zi ๐’ฃ zi zi ๐’ข zi zi ๐’‚  zi ๐’€“ zi ๐’† ๐’‰ˆ zi ๐’†— zu ๐’ช zu zu ๐’…— zu zu ๐’ฎ zu ๐’ zu ๐’‰™ zu ๐’‹ค zu ๐’‚„ zu ๐’†› zu ๐’†‰ az ๐’Š az az ๐’€พ az az ๐’€ธ ez ๐’„‘ ez ez ๐’Œ ez ez v ez ๐’…– iz ๐’„‘ iz iz ๐’…– iz iz ๐’€Š uz ๐’Šป uz uz ๐’‘ uz uz ๐’š uz ๐’Š uz ๐’‡‡ uz ๐’š uz ๐’Œ zAkkadian VCV syllabic glyphs aCV eCV iCV uCV สพ aสพa ๐’†น uสพa ๐’‡‡๐’€€eสพi ๐’‚๐’€€ uสพi ๐’‡‡๐’€€eสพu ๐’‚๐’€€ uสพu ๐’‡‡๐’€€ b aba ๐’€Š aba aba ๐’€œ aba ๐’€” uba uba ๐’‚  uba uba ๐’€š uba ๐’€› ๐’€šubi ๐’ƒด ubi ubi ๐’‹ฆubu ๐’€น ubu ubu ๐’Œ’ d edi ๐’ƒ„ idi ๐’ƒŸudu ๐’‡ป udu udu ๐’‹—๐’ g aga ๐’‚† aga aga ๐’‰˜ aga aga ๐’‚… ega ๐’€€๐’ˆช๐’€€ ega ega ๐’‰ง iga ๐’…… uga ๐’Œ‘๐’‰€๐’‚ต uga uga ๐’€€๐’…—ege ๐’‚  ege ege ๐’Šฉ๐’‚ egi ๐’‚  egi egi ๐’Šฉ๐’‚  igi ๐’…† igi igi ๐’…Š igi igi ๐’† ๐’Š•agu ๐’‚† egu ๐’€€๐’†ช igu ๐’…† ugu ๐’Œ‹๐’…— ugu uga ๐’€€๐’…— ugu ug ๐’€€๐’Š• ugu ๐’†ช ugu ๐’Šจ แธซ aแธซa ๐’„ด aแธซa aแธซa ๐’‹€ aแธซa aแธซa ๐’‰ฝeแธซe ๐’€‰๐’Œ“๐’บaแธซi ๐’‹€ aแธซi aแธซi ๐’€‰ eแธซi ๐’€‰๐’Œ“๐’บuแธซu ๐’„ด uแธซu uแธซu ๐’Œ” i aia ๐’€€๐’€€ aia aia ๐’€€ aia aia ๐’Œจ aia ๐’†น uia ๐’Œ‹ k aka ๐’€ aka aka ๐’‰˜ aka aka ๐’‹ƒ aka ๐’†eki ๐’‚Šiku ๐’ƒท uku ๐’‚† uku uku ๐’‡ณ๐’บ uku uku ๐’Œฆ uku ๐’ŠŒ uku ๐’‡ณ๐’บ๐’บ l ala ๐’Œท ala ala ๐’Œท๐’ˆจ๐’Œ ala ala ๐’€  ela ๐’€€๐’†— ila ๐’€ญ ila ila ๐’… ula ๐’ŒŒ ula ula ๐’ƒชale ๐’Œท ele ๐’Œ‹๐’…— ele ele ๐’‚–ali ๐’Œท ili ๐’€ญ ili ili ๐’… ili ๐’‚– ili ๐’น ili ๐’€ญ๐’ˆจ๐’Œ uli ๐’…ดalu alu ๐’Œท ilu ๐’€ญ ulu ๐’ŒŒ ulu ulu ๐’„ด๐’ˆจ๐’Œ‹ ulu ulu ๐’‡ ulu ๐’Œท m ama ๐’‚ผ ama ama ๐’„  ama ama ๐’„€๐’‡ป ama ๐’ƒ˜ ama ๐’ƒฃ ama ๐’†พ uma ๐’ปame ๐’‚ผ ame ame ๐’ƒฃ eme ๐’…ด eme eme ๐’Ž˜ eme eme ๐’Šฉ๐’€ฒ eme ๐’‚ผ eme ๐’Šฉ๐’„ธ eme ๐’€ฒ๐’Šฉ eme ๐’Šฉ๐’€  eme ๐’ƒฃimi ๐’…Ž imi imi ๐’‚ผumu ๐’Œ n ana ๐’น ana ana ๐’€ญ ana ana ๐’€ธ ina ๐’€ธ ina ina ๐’…†eni ๐’‚— ini ๐’…” ini ini ๐’…† ini ๐’…†๐’ˆซanu ๐’€ญ enu ๐’‚— enu ๐’…† inu ๐’…† ๐’…† inuแดตแดต ๐’…† ๐’…†๐’ˆซ inu inu ๐’…† unu ๐’€” unu unu ๐’‹ผ๐’€• unu unu ๐’€–๐’†ช unu ๐’Œฆ unu ๐’€Š unu ๐’‹ผ๐’€Š unu ๐’‹ฝ๐’€• unu ๐’‘ unu ๐’†’๐’‹™ ๐’†“ unu ๐’„ƒ unu ๐’๐’ˆฝ๐’€• unu ๐’ q aqa ๐’€ r ara ๐’Šญ ara ara ๐’Œ’ ara ara ๐’„ฏ ara ๐’Œ“๐’บ ara ๐’„ฏ๐’„ฏ ara ๐’บ ara ๐’Œ“ ara ๐’…ˆ era ๐’€ด๐’Š era era ๐’€€๐’…† era era ๐’ƒž era ๐’ƒข ira ๐’€€๐’…† ura ๐’‹€๐’€• ura ๐’‹€๐’€Šari ๐’Œต ari ari ๐’ ari ari ๐’‰บ ari ๐’‰บ๐’ˆจ๐’Œ ari ๐’‹ง eri ๐’Œท eri ๐’Œท eri ๐’€” eri ๐’€Š eri ๐’ˆ eri ๐’…• eri ๐’ƒž eri ๐’ƒข iri ๐’Œท iri ๐’ iri ๐’€• iri ๐’€Š iri ๐’…• uri ๐’Œต uri uri ๐’‹€๐’€• uri uri ๐’‹€ uri ๐’ uri ๐’‹€๐’€Šaru ๐’‰บ eru ๐’€ด eru eru ๐’Š•๐’Šฉ eru eru ๐’ŠŸ eru ๐’€€๐’‚” eru ๐’‚” uru ๐’Œท uru uru ๐’ uru uru ๐’‹€ uru ๐’€ณ uru ๐’‹ฝ uru ๐’‰ž uru ๐’Œฒ uru ๐’Œซ uru ๐’‹ž๐’ uru ๐’Š  uru ๐’Œพ uru ๐’ƒก uru ๐’Œจ uru ๐’‹€๐’€• uru ๐’‹€๐’€Š uru ๐’‚— uru ๐’‡ uru ๐’Œธ uru ๐’Œต s asa ๐’Š usa asi ๐’€€๐’Œ esi ๐’†— isi ๐’…– usi ๐’ƒฅusu ๐’€‰๐’†— usu usu ๐’‘ s asa ๐’€ธ asa asa ๐’€พ asa asa asa ๐’ƒท esa ๐’€€๐’Œ esa esa ๐’Œese ๐’Œ ese ese ๐’‚  ese ese ese ๐’€€๐’Œisi ๐’…– isi isi ๐’‹™๐’€ฏusu ๐’” usu usu ๐’Œ‹๐’Œ“ usu usu ๐’Œ t ita ๐’€ญ๐’€€๐’‡‰ ita ๐’€€๐’‡‰ uta ๐’Œ“iti ๐’Œ— iti iti ๐’Œ› iti iti ๐’†œ๐’Œ— iti ๐’€ญ๐’€€๐’‡‰ iti ๐’€€๐’‡‰ iti ๐’Œ“๐’€ญ๐’‹€๐’†  iti ๐’Œ—๐’€ญ๐’‹€๐’† itu ๐’Œ— itu itu ๐’Œ› itu ๐’€ญ๐’€€๐’‡‰ itu ๐’€€๐’‡‰ utu ๐’Œ“ utu utu ๐’Œ‹๐’‚ต utu utu ๐’Œ‹๐’Œ‹ utu ๐’† ๐’†  utu ๐’€พ y i j aya ai a aja ๐’€€๐’€€ iya ija ๐’€€๐’€€aye ai e aje ๐’€€๐’€€ iye ije ๐’€€๐’€€ayi ai i aji ๐’€€๐’€€ iyi iji ๐’€€๐’€€ayu ai u aju ๐’€€๐’€€ iyu iju ๐’€€๐’€€ z aza ๐’Š uza uza ๐’šizi ๐’‰ˆ izi izi ๐’† ๐’‰ˆazu ๐’‰™ izu ๐’‰ˆ uzu ๐’œ uzu uzu ๐’‰™ uzu uzu ๐’Šป uzu ๐’Œ‹๐’Œ“Akkadian CVV and CVC syllabic glyphs CaV CaC CeV CeC CiV CiC CuV CuCb baสพ ๐’bab ๐’‰ฝ bab bab ๐’Œ“bad ๐’ bad bad ๐’‚ฆ bad ๐’† ๐’†— bad ๐’…† bid ๐’‚ bid bid ๐’ bid bid ๐’†ชbag ๐’„ท big ๐’‹ bug ๐’ˆฎbaแธซ ๐’„ท baแธซ baแธซ ๐’ˆœ buแธซ ๐’ˆœbak ๐’„ท bik ๐’‹ buk ๐’ˆฎbal ๐’„ bal bal ๐’” bal bal ๐’€ก bal ๐’€ฆ bel ๐’‰ˆ bel bel ๐’‰‹ bil ๐’‰ˆ bil bil ๐’‰‹ bil bil ๐’„‘๐’‰‹ bil ๐’„‘๐’‰ˆ bul ๐’‡ง bul bul ๐’” bul bul ๐’„ bul ๐’…ฎ bul ๐’‡กbum ๐’…ค bum bum ๐’† ๐’‚€ bum bum ๐’…—ban ๐’‰ผ ban ban ban ban ๐’Œ‰ ban ๐’†• bin ๐’€ณ bun ๐’‡Œ bun bun ๐’…ฎbap ๐’‰ฝbaq ๐’„ท biq ๐’‹bar ๐’‡ bar bar ๐’ˆ bar bar ๐’– bar ๐’‰Œ๐’‚Ÿ bar ๐’‹ž bar ๐’Œ“ bar ๐’‰ˆ bar ๐’‚™ ber ๐’„ต ber ber ๐’Œ“ ber ๐’Šฏ bir ๐’„ต bir bir ๐’Œ“ bir bir ๐’‚Ÿ bir ๐’‚” bir ๐’‰† ๐’‰… bir ๐’Šถ bir ๐’Šฏ bir ๐’€€๐’‹ค bir ๐’‰ˆ bir ๐’„Š bur ๐’“ bur bur ๐’” bur bur ๐’Œ‹ bur ๐’‹“๐’“ bur ๐’‰… bur ๐’†ค ๐’†ฆ bur ๐’„ฌ bur ๐’‡ง bur ๐’† ๐’‚—๐’†• bur ๐’ bur ๐’‰ฝ๐’‰ฝ bur ๐’‚™bis bis ๐’„ซbas ๐’ˆฆ bes ๐’Œ“ bis ๐’„ซ bus ๐’†œ bus bus ๐’„ซbat ๐’ bat bat ๐’‰ป bat bat ๐’‚ฆ bat ๐’…† bet ๐’‚ bit ๐’‚ bit bit ๐’baแนญ ๐’ biแนญ ๐’‚biz ๐’‰d dab ๐’ณ dab dab ๐’‹ฐ dab dab ๐’„ญ dab ๐’พ dab ๐’†ช dab ๐’ dib ๐’ณ dib dib ๐’†ช dub ๐’พ dub dub ๐’‚€ dub dub ๐’„ญdad ๐’‹บ did ๐’…Ž dud ๐’‰บ๐’œdag ๐’– dag dag ๐’Œ“ dag dag ๐’‰Œ๐’‚Ÿ dag ๐’†ฆ dag ๐’…— dag ๐’‹ณ dig ๐’‰Œ dug ๐’‚ dug dug ๐’Œ‡ dug dug ๐’„ญ dug ๐’…— dug ๐’‚…daแธซ ๐’ˆญ deแธซ ๐’พ deแธซ deแธซ ๐’Œ deแธซ deแธซ ๐’‰ diแธซ ๐’พ diแธซ diแธซ ๐’Œ diแธซ diแธซ ๐’‰ duแธซ ๐’‚ƒdak ๐’– dak dak ๐’‰Œ๐’‚Ÿ dik ๐’‰Œ duk ๐’‚ duk duk ๐’Œ‡dal ๐’Š‘ dal dal ๐’ˆฆ๐’„˜๐’ƒผ dal dal ๐’€ธ del ๐’€ธ del del ๐’‡บ dil ๐’€ธ dul ๐’Œ‹๐’Œ† dul dul ๐’‡ฅ dul dul ๐’Šจ dul ๐’‚ˆ dul ๐’Œ† dul ๐’‡ฏ dul ๐’Š• dul ๐’ณ dul ๐’Œช dul ๐’dam ๐’ฎ dam dam ๐’Œ“ dam dam ๐’Œˆ dem ๐’ถ dim ๐’ด dim dim ๐’ถ dim dim ๐’Š๐’ƒต ๐’ˆ• dim ๐’‰ฝ๐’‰ฝ dim ๐’‚€ dum ๐’Œˆ dum dum ๐’ฎ dum ๐’ดdan ๐’†— dan dan ๐’ƒž dan dan ๐’ƒฉ dan ๐’ƒ‹ dan ๐’ท dan ๐’• dan ๐’ƒƒ den ๐’ท din ๐’ท din din ๐’†— din din ๐’ถ dun ๐’‚„ dun dun ๐’‚… dun ๐’‚ˆ dun ๐’” dun ๐’†—dap ๐’ณ dap dap ๐’‹ฐ dip ๐’ณ dup ๐’พ dup dup ๐’‚€daq ๐’– daq daq ๐’‰Œ๐’‚Ÿ daq ๐’‹ณ diq ๐’‰Œ duq ๐’‚dar ๐’ฏ dar dar ๐’… dar dar ๐’ฐ dar ๐’ฑ dar ๐’‹ป der ๐’‹›๐’€€ dir ๐’‹›๐’€€ dir dir ๐’ฏ dir dir ๐’€ญ dir ๐’Œ dur ๐’„™ dur dur ๐’‚‰ ๐’†ช dur dur ๐’€ฒ๐’€ด dur ๐’‰ dur ๐’€€ dur ๐’ dur ๐’‚ฆ dur ๐’‚„ dur ๐’Šฟ dur ๐’Œ…das ๐’Œจdas ๐’Œจ das das ๐’น das das ๐’€พ das ๐’ฏ des ๐’น des des ๐’€ธ des des ๐’Œจ des ๐’ˆจ des ๐’€น dis ๐’น dis dis ๐’€ธ dis ๐’€น dus ๐’†ช dus dus ๐’นdat ๐’‹บg gab ๐’ƒฎ gab gab ๐’† gab gab ๐’…˜ gib ๐’„ƒ gib gib ๐’‰ gib gib ๐’ˆช๐’‰ญ gub ๐’บ gub gub ๐’‡ท gub gub ๐’† gub ๐’‰Œ gub ๐’€œ๐’†คgad ๐’ƒฐ gid ๐’†ค gid gid ๐’ gid gid ๐’Š“ gid ๐’ƒฐ gid ๐’‹บ gud ๐’„ž gud gud ๐’Šฅ gud gud ๐’Œ‘๐’† ๐’‹ง๐’‚ต gud ๐’‹ป gud ๐’ƒด gud ๐’ˆ gud ๐’†ช gud ๐’†ธ gud ๐’‹ƒ gud ๐’† ๐’‚€gag ๐’†• gig ๐’ˆช๐’‰ญ gig gig ๐’ˆช gig gig ๐’„ƒ gig ๐’‚… gug ๐’๐’„ข gug gug ๐’ˆ– gug gug ๐’ƒป๐’ˆ– gug ๐’ค๐’†ธ gug ๐’ˆ™ gug ๐’…—๐’†•gak ๐’†• gik ๐’ˆช๐’‰ญ guk guk ๐’ˆ–gal ๐’ƒฒ gal gal ๐’…… gal gal ๐’‡ gal ๐’Šฉ gal ๐’‹ผ gal ๐’Œ“ gal ๐’†— gal ๐’‡ฝ๐’น gel ๐’„ƒ gel gel ๐’†ธ gil ๐’„ƒ gil gil ๐’†ธ gil gil ๐’… gul ๐’„ข gul gul ๐’†ฐ gul gul ๐’‹ผgam ๐’ƒต gam gam ๐’„ฐ gam gam ๐’†› gam ๐’ƒถ gem ๐’ถ gem gem ๐’Šฉ๐’†ณ gim ๐’ถ gim gim ๐’‚… gim gim ๐’Šฉ๐’†ณ gim ๐’ฝ gim ๐’ผ gim ๐’บ gim ๐’ gim ๐’ƒฐ๐’‹บ๐’„‘ gum ๐’„ฃ gum gum ๐’ˆ gum gum ๐’‰ˆ gum ๐’ƒตgan ๐’ƒถ gan gan ๐’ƒท gan gan ๐’ฝ gan ๐’ƒต gen ๐’บ gen gen ๐’†ณ gen ๐’ถ gin ๐’บ gin gin ๐’‚… gin gin ๐’†ณ gin ๐’ค๐’†ธ gin ๐’„€ gin ๐’ถ gin ๐’„ฏ gun ๐’„˜๐’Œฆ gun gun ๐’„˜ gun gun ๐’ฏ gun ๐’€• gun ๐’ˆgap ๐’ƒฎ gap gap ๐’† gip gip ๐’„’ gup ๐’บ gup gup ๐’‡ทgiq ๐’ˆช๐’‰ญ guq ๐’๐’„ขgar ๐’ƒป gar gar ๐’‚ถ gar gar ๐’ƒผ gar ๐’„ž๐’„ž gar ๐’ˆ– gar ๐’‰ฃ gar ๐’ˆฅ gar ๐’‹ž gar ๐’‚ต gar ๐’‚ถ gar ๐’‚ถ gar ๐’‚ถ gar ๐’‹ฝ gar ๐’‹ผ๐’€€ gar ๐’ƒธ ger ๐’„ซ ger ger ๐’„ˆ ger ger ๐’บ ger ๐’‚  gir ๐’„ซ gir gir ๐’„ˆ gir gir ๐’„Š gir ๐’Œ‹๐’€œ gir ๐’ฝ gir ๐’ผ gir ๐’บ gir ๐’†ธ gir ๐’€š gir ๐’‰ˆ gir ๐’‚ก gir ๐’…” gir ๐’‹ƒ gir ๐’„ฉ gir ๐’‚  gir ๐’„Œ gir ๐’…— gur ๐’„ฅ

rec-icon Recommended Topics
Share this article
Read the free encyclopedia and learn everything...
See more
Read the free encyclopedia. All information in Wikipedia is available. No payment required.
Share this article on
Share
XXX 0C
Saturday, 08 February, 2025
Follow Us On