Technical geography

Technical geography is the branch of geography that involves using, studying, and creating tools to obtain, analyze, interpret, understand, and communicate spatial information.

The other branches of geography, most commonly limited to human geography and physical geography, can usually apply the concepts and techniques of technical geography. However, the methods and theory are distinct, and a technical geographer may be more concerned with the technological and theoretical concepts than the nature of the data. Further, a technical geographer may explore the relationship between the spatial technology and the end users to improve upon the technology and better understand the impact of the technology on human behavior. Thus, the spatial data types a technical geographer employs may vary widely, including human and physical geography topics, with the common thread being the techniques and philosophies employed. To accomplish this, technical geographers often create their own software or scripts, which can then be applied more broadly by others. They may also explore applying techniques developed for one application to another unrelated topic, such as applying Kriging, originally developed for mining, to disciplines as diverse as real-estate prices.

In teaching technical geography, instructors often need to fall back on examples from human and physical geography to explain the theoretical concepts. While technical geography mostly works with quantitative data, the techniques and technology can be applied to qualitative geography, differentiating it from quantitative geography. Within the branch of technical geography are the major and overlapping subbranches of geographic information science, geomatics, and geoinformatics.

Fundamentals

Technical geography is highly theoretical and focuses on developing and testing methods and technologies for handling spatial-temporal data. These technologies are then applied to datasets and problems within the branches of both human and physical geography. Historically, technical geography was focused on cartography and globe-making. Today, while technical geographers still develop and make maps, the Information Age has pushed the development of information management techniques to handle spatial data and support decision-makers. To this end, technical geographers often adapt technology and techniques from other disciplines to spatial problems rather than create original innovations, such as using computers to aid in cartography. They also explore adapting techniques developed for one area of geography to another, such as kriging, originally created for estimating gold ore distributions but now applied to topics such as real estate appraisal. Technical geography today is theoretically grounded in information theory, or the study of mathematical laws that govern information systems.

Core concepts

There are several concepts related to technical geography that are considered central attributes of the discipline. In one paper, autocorrelation and frequency are listed as the concepts that technical geography is based upon. Central to technical geography are the technologies surrounding cartography and map production, which is only possible through cartographic generalization. More than just reducing the overall level of information, cartographic generalization helps discover patterns and trends in data that underlie many techniques and technologies employed and investigated by technical geographers.

Autocorrelation

Moran's I statistic computed for different spatial patterns. Using 'rook' neighbors for each grid cell, setting ${\displaystyle w_{ij}=1}$ for neighbours ${\displaystyle j}$ of ${\displaystyle i}$ and then row normalizing the weight matrix. Top left shows anti-correlation giving a negative I. Top right shows a spatial gradient giving a large positive I. Bottom left shows random data giving a value of I near 0 (or ${\displaystyle -1/(N-1)\simeq -0.04}$). Bottom right shows an 'ink blot' or spreading pattern with positive autocorrelation.

Clusters of the estimated percent of people in poverty by county in the contiguous United States in 2020 calculated using Anselin Local Moran's I.

Autocorrelation is a statistical measure used to assess the degree to which a given data set is correlated with itself over different time intervals or spatial distances. In essence, it quantifies the similarity between observations as a function of the time lag or spatial distance between them. Autocorrelation can be positive (indicating that similar values cluster together) or negative (indicating that dissimilar values are near each other). Spatial autocorrelation involves the correlation of a variable with itself across different spatial locations. Temporal autocorrelation involves the correlation of a signal with a delayed copy of itself over successive time intervals. Autocorrelation is the foundation of Tobler's first law of geography. Spatial autocorrelation is measured with tools such as Moran's I or Getis–Ord statistics.

Autocorrelation is fundamental to technical geography because it provides critical insights into the spatial and temporal structure of geographical data. It enhances the ability to model, analyze, and interpret spatial patterns and relationships, supporting various applications from environmental monitoring and urban planning to resource management and public health. By understanding and leveraging autocorrelation, geographers can make more informed decisions, improve the accuracy of their analyses, and contribute to solving real-world geographical problems. The techniques and technologies used to leverage this understanding are a core focus of technical geography.

Frequency

In statistics, frequency refers to the number of occurrences of a particular event or value within a dataset. When dealing with spatial and temporal datasets, the concept of frequency can be applied to understand how often certain events or values occur across different locations (spatial) or over time (temporal). Spatial datasets contain data points that are associated with specific geographic locations, and frequency in spatial datasets can be used to analyze patterns and distributions across different areas. Temporal datasets involve data points that are associated with specific time points, and frequency in temporal datasets helps analyze trends and patterns over time. Analyzing how the frequency of events changes across both space and time can reveal dynamic patterns. Spatial and temporal frequency are core concepts in technical geography because they are fundamental to understanding and analyzing geographic phenomena. Geography is inherently concerned with the distribution and dynamics of features across space and over time, and technical geography researches and develops the techniques to deal with this data.

Cartographic generalization

Cartographic generalization is the process of simplifying the representation of geographical information on maps, making complex data more understandable and useful for specific purposes or scales. This process involves selectively reducing the detail of features to prevent clutter and ensure that the map communicates the intended information effectively. The need for generalization arises because maps often depict large areas and scales, where including every detail is impractical and can overwhelm the map reader. The primary goal of cartographic generalization is to balance detail with readability, ensuring that the map serves its intended purpose without sacrificing essential information. By placing data in a spatial context, even though it is generalized, cartographic generalization creates additional information by revealing patterns and trends in the data.

Effective generalization requires a deep understanding of the map's use case, the audience's needs, and the geographical context. Technological advancements, such as the World Wide Web (WWW), Geographic information systems (GIS), and information theory have greatly aided cartographers in generalizing maps more efficiently and consistently. These tools can apply generalization rules systematically, ensuring high-quality outputs even as data volume increases. Cartographic generalization is foundational in technical geography because it ensures that maps are functional, readable, and tailored to their intended use. It balances the need for detail with the practical limitations of scale and medium, enhancing the effectiveness of maps as tools for communication, analysis, and decision-making.

History

Early history and etymology

The term "technical geography" is a combination of the words "technical", from the Greek τεχνικός (tekhnikós, translated as artistic, skillful, workmanlike), meaning relating to a particular subject or activity and involving practical skills, and "geography", from the Greek γεωγραφία (geographia, a combination of Greek words 'Geo', the Earth, and 'Graphien', to describe. Literally "earth description"), a field of science devoted to the study of the lands, features, inhabitants, and phenomena of Earth. Technical geography as a distinct term in the English language within the discipline of geography dates back at least as far as 1749 to a book published by English printer Edward Cave at St John's Gate, Clerkenwell. This 1749 book was divided into four parts, one of which was named "containing technical geography", which focused on both globes and maps, including concepts of cartographic design, and projection. One author described the publication as being "more concerned with the construction of accurate maps (and globes) than with the descriptions that would accompany them." In this book, the author chose to use the term "technical geography" rather than "practical geography" to clarify that the branch is distinct in theory and methods. This publication defines technical geography with the following:

"The Description confider'd as to Form is of three Sorts; The first exhibits the Earth, by a Draught or Delineation; the second by Tables, or Registers; and the third by Treties or Discourse. Hence Technical Geography may be divided into Representatory, Synoptical, and Explanatory."

— Geography reformed: a new system of general geography, according to an accurate analysis of the science in four parts, 1749,

While when the term technical geography first entered the English lexicon may be difficult to ascertain, technical geography as a concept crosses cultures, and techniques date back to the origins of cartography, surveying, and remote sensing. Technical geography as a term is more than place name recollection and toponymy; it involves spatial relationships between points and theory.Eratosthenes has been called the "founder of mathematical geography", and his activities are described as "little different from what we expect of a technical geographer." Within the "Ptolemaic tradition" of geography started by Ptolemy, scholars have identified distinct "technical elements" in "Ptolemaic cartographic theory" such as map projection, lines of latitude and longitude, coordinates, grids, scales, and the theory of astronomically defined climates.Islamic geographers later adopted these technical elements when Ptolmey's book, Geographia, was translated into Arabic in the ninth century, often mixing them with elements of traditional Islamic cartography. For example, the Kitab al-Buldan, written by Ibn al-Faqih between 902 and 903 C.E., was described by Henri Massé as "technical geography [including] themes of adab."

19th century

By the late 1800s, the term "technical geography" was in use to some capacity in American public education and academia. For example, an article in the 1889 edition of the journal School and Home Education stated that "we never hear teachers questioning whether technical geography shall be taught in the schools" and defined the term "technical" to mean "especially appropriate to any art or science." An 1890 publication advertised that the 1891 International Geographical Congress at Berne would have five divisions in it program, with the first being technical geography listing topics like mathematical geography, geodesy, and cartography as examples of content within this division

20th century

Early 20th century

The islands in the Rock Island passage were disputed between Wisconsin and Michigan in U.S. Supreme Court cases in 1935 and 1936, given a boundary defined without technical geography.

In 1902, geodesy was suggested as a discipline supporting technical geography by supplying the "backbone, that main axis of indisputable values from which our network of triangulations may spread during the first steps in geographical map-making.". In 1908, geography professor included technical geography alongside regional geography, physical geography, and general research as courses that should be taught at in U.S. university geography departments. Hubbard specifies that technical geography refers to topics such as "mathematical or astronomical geography", as well as cartography. A 1910 publication in the Bulletin of the American Geographical Society (now the Geographical Review) introduced the concept of "scientific geography" and discussed employing the scientific method to geographic concepts. This publication proposed how a field of scientific geography could be organized, and specified that "Phytogeography", "Zoogeography", and "Anthropogeography" could be areas where scientific principles could be applied. While this publication did not use the term technical geography in its description, several later publications explicitly link scientific and technical geography. By 1917, technical geography was included among courses taught at some British schools, alongside mathematics, chemistry, and other natural sciences. As techniques and concepts in technical geography advanced, geographers began to lament the lack of understanding and use of more advanced geographic concepts in society and law. Specifically, this became an issue during the 1930s Michigan-Wisconsin Boundary Case in the Supreme Court of the United States, where the border was not defined with specific technical geographic concepts. During the 1940s, Oregon State University began focusing on technical geography as part of an applied geography program.

Quantitative revolution

Technical geography differentiated more clearly during the quantitative revolution in the 1950s and 1960s. Before this, the techniques and methods of handling spatial information were primarily focused on supporting human or physical geography, rather than a subject of study itself. World War II, which saw the extensive use of cartography and air photos, revolutionized these techniques and brought a new focus on the benefits they offered. In the years before the quantitative revolution, geography was generally fragmented and focused on descriptive approaches, and many United States universities were eliminating geography departments around the country. To address this, geographers began to debate the merits of more scientific and methods-based approaches to the discipline and advocate for the benefits these methods had to other technical courses. Some, such as the preeminent cartographer George Jenks went as far as to suggest that cartography should be a separate academic discipline from geography entirely, even if only at a few academic institutions. This approach was shunned by more traditional geographers, who viewed it as a deviation from how geographers had always viewed and interacted with maps. While the best approach to the technical aspect of geography was heavily debated among geographers, geography departments at universities across the United States began to teach a more scientific approach to geography.

Laws of geography

Waldo Tobler, originator of Tobler's first and second law of geography, in front of the Newberry Library. Chicago, November 2007

The quantitative revolution is primarily credited with shifting descriptive, or idiographic, geography to an empirical law-making, or nomothetic, geography. The first of these laws was proposed by Waldo Tobler in a 1970 paper, and more have been proposed since. Some geographers argue against the idea that laws in geography are necessary or even valid. These criticisms have been addressed by Tobler and others. Examples of these laws include Tobler's first law of geography, Tobler's second law of geography, and Arbia's law of geography. French geographer Ionel Haidu noted Tobler's first law of geography, and the associated concept of spatial autocorrelation, as central concepts to technical geography.

20th century technologies

The 20th century saw the rapid emergence of technologies such as computers, satellites, and the corresponding software to operate them. These technologies rapidly changed how geographers operated, and significant effort went into considering how best to incorporate them into the discipline. With these technologies came new disciplines and terms like , which focus on mathematical modeling and theoretical implications of cartography. These terms often compete and overlap with each other and often originate in separate countries, such as geographic information science in the United States, geomatics in France, and geoinformatics in Sweden. Three major technologies, remote sensing (RS), Geographic information systems (GIS), and the global positioning system (GPS) are highlighted as examples of technologies characterizing technical geography.

Remote sensing

The TR-1 reconnaissance/surveillance aircraft

Along with computers and GIS, new spatial data sources emerged during the quantitative revolution. Air photo technology was widely used in World War I and, in subsequent years, was applied to civilian endeavors. A 1941 textbook titled "Aerophotography and Aerosurverying" stated the following in the first line of its preference:

"There is no longer any need to preach for aerial photography-not in the United States- for so widespread has become its use and so great its value that even the farmer who plants his fields in a remote corner of the country knows its value."

— James W. Bagley,

Remote sensing technology again advanced rapidly during World War II, and the techniques employed were rapidly assimilated as aids in geographical studies. During the Cold War, advancements in photography, aircraft, and rockets only increased the effectiveness of remote sensing techniques. As the technology became available to the general public, geographers were soon overwhelmed with large volumes of satellite and aerial images. New techniques were required to store, process, analyze, and use this new data source, birthing remote sensing scientists.

Computer cartography and GIS

QGIS Interface Screenshot with Map of Median Income in Houston (2010)

Coinciding with the quantitative revolution was the emergence of early computers. The interdisciplinary nature of geography forces geographers to look at developments in other fields, and geographers tend to observe and adapt technological innovations from other disciplines rather than developing unique technologies to conduct geographic studies. More than a decade after the first computers were developed, Waldo Tobler published the first paper detailing the use of computers in the map-making process titled "Automation and Cartography" in 1959. While novel in terms of application, the process detailed by Tobler did not allow for storing or analyzing of geographic data. As computer technology progressed and better hardware became available, geographers rapidly adopted the technology to create maps. In 1960, Roger Tomlinson created the first geographic information system, which allowed for storing and analysis of spatial data within a computer. These tools revolutionized the discipline of geography by contributing to the positivist scientific approaches to the discipline during the quantitative revolution. In the 1985 book Technological Transition in Cartography, Mark Monmonier speculated that computer cartography facilitated by GIS would largely replace traditional pen and paper cartography. Geographers began to heavily debate the place of GIS in geography, with some rejecting its methods and others heavily advocating for it. In response to critics, British geographer Stan Openshaw stated:

...if geographers reject GIS then it could fundamentally affect the outside world's perception of what geography is all about. Certainly, these external perceptions may well be based on a picture of geography as it once was, but nevertheless they cannot be ignored. "How could they be so foolish as to disown the very core of their discipline?"

— Stan Openshaw,

With the emergence of GIS, researchers rapidly began to explore methods to use the technology for various geographic problems. This led some geographers to declare the study of the computer-based methods their own science within geography. GIS serves as the primary technology driving the field of geodesign by enabling real-time feedback in considering geography and landscape with community planning.

Global Positioning System

GPS constellation system animation

In 1978, the United States military launched the first satellites to enable the modern Global Positioning System (GPS), and the system's full capability was made available to the general public in 2000. This facilitated a level of rapid acquisition of spatial coordinates that previously would have been expensive. Geographers began studying methods and applications for this data. In subsequent years, other countries have launched satellite constellations enabling Satellite navigation, including Russia's GLONASS, China's BeiDou Navigation Satellite System, and the European Union's Galileo navigation satellite system.

New subdisciplines

During the quantitative revolution, several terms originated from the concept that the technologies developed during this period are a focus of independent study, including quantitative geography, geomatics, geoinformatics, and geographic information science. These terms all overlap to some degree, but at least one study indicates they differ substantially enough to continue using. The proliferation of these new terms may have been detrimental to their popularity, and it has been suggested that they were possibly created carelessly or hastily. This has led to some confusion, and properly defining the areas covered by each term is an active field of research. One paper on the topic stated the following:

With the appearance of the next new technologies, immediately, new proposals of new sciences, new subdisciplines, appear. Many authors with great ease announce the origination of a new science, frequently not caring for the proper justification of its name definition. The old definitions, developed in the context of previous technological conditions, remain in the shadow of new technologies, and are not modernised. The lack of specific terminological conditions, determined boundaries, or scopes of such definition use, encourages one to define the next terms, and the next science and research disciplines.

— ,

Quantitative geography

During the early days of the quantitative revolution, the term quantitative geography emerged as a subdiscipline within technical geography, focusing exclusively on new quantitative methods, such as spatial statistics, time geography (including visualizations such as the space-time prism and continuous transportation modeling approach), and GIS, for handling spatial-temporal data generated by novel technology like GPS and remote sensing. This part of technical geography focuses on spatial statistics and visualizing spatial information, emphasizing quantitative data and the scientific method.

Geomatics

In 1960, coined the term "géomatique" in French. English-speaking Canadians Pierre Gagnon and David Coleman translated the term as "geomatics", which was popularized in Canada through the 1980s and early 1990s. Today, it is defined by the ISO/TC 211, an International Organization for Standardization committee focused on geographic information, as the discipline concerned with handling geographic data or geographic information. In Canada, an effort was made to replace and absorb the term geodesy with geomatics; however, this was not successful, and globally, geodesy is generally considered "immutable" as a term. Geomatics was included in the UNESCO Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems under technical geography.

Geoinformatics

In the late 1980s, the term geoinformatics was coined by Swedish scientist Kjell Samuelson and later defined in the 1990s as the science of integrating spatial data derived from various technologies, such as remote sensing, GPS, and GIS. It was later defined by geographer Michael DeMers to include processing of spatial data through the use of computers. This term has been described as being outside the branch of geography entirely and instead placed fully under the discipline of computer science, while other sources place it under the branch of technical geography. Sources have noted that there is no universally accepted definition of geoinformatics.

Geographic Information Science

In the 1990s, the term Geographic Information Science (GIScience) was coined and popularized in the United States by geographer Michael Frank Goodchild to describe "the subset of information science that is about geographic information." GIScience is mentioned explicitly as being separate from quantitative geography, but under the branch of technical geography. In 1995, the University Consortium for Geographic Information Science (UCGIS) was established in the United States to support the field of GIScience, such as the creation of a "model curricula" by geographer Duane Marble to help educators teach GIScience. There has been significant debate around the term GIScience, including questioning if it can be considered a science. Many geographers, including Michael Goodchild, continue to advance the use of the term today.

Emergence of critical geography

In the same 1749 publication in which Cave discussed technical geography (Geography reformed: a new system of general geography, according to an accurate analysis of the science in four parts. The whole illustrated with notes) critical geography was considered an important part of the process within geography to correct errors on maps and other products to improve models of the world. In the 1970s, critical geography took on the framework of critical theory and Marxist philosophy, and became an umbrella uniting various theoretical frameworks in geography, including Marxist geography, feminist geography, and radical geography (a branch of geography that advocates that geographic research should focus on social issues transforming society). These frameworks were mostly advanced mostly by human geographers, leading to an observed gap between human and physical geographers. In response to the ideas and philosophies advanced during the quantitative revolution, particularly positivism and the emphasis on quantitative methods, the term critical geography was applied to ideological and theoretical criticisms of the methods and ideas of technical geographers. Other geographers, such as Yi-Fu Tuan, have criticized that geography for moving away from the abstract, unquantifiable aspects of place that are essential to the understanding of geography.

In the history of geography since the quantitative revolution, theorists from critical geography are often viewed as in direct confrontation with those of technical and quantitative geography. Some, such as Peter Gould, argued that these criticisms were largely due to the difficulty in learning the emerging novel technologies. Some geographers, including Stewart Fotheringham, argue that many of the early criticisms of quantitative methods have been addressed with advances in technology, and persist due to ignorance of quantitative geography. Geographer noted that some physical geographers suspect several of the philosophies underlying critical geography are "fundamentally anti-scientific".

21st century

As new technologies and methods applied by geographers, such as spatial analysis, cartography/GIS, remote sensing, and GPS, are widely applicable to various disciplines, concern grew among geographers that these other non-geographers in other disciplines might become better at using them than geographers. In response to this, in 2006, the peer-reviewed journal Geographia Technica was established to serve as an outlet for research employing quantitative, technical, and scientific methods within geography.

In a 2016 paper within this journal, stated:

"The risk is that non-geographers mastering these methods analyze the spatiotemporal data and information better than the geographers. That is why the need to deal with competition induced by other sciences claiming the geographic space as their subject of study and research becomes a serious challenge for geographers. Geographers need to test and adapt to the new methods, models and procedures and implement them in all fields and development trends of Geography. By these also, Technical Geography as a new line of research and professional training becomes a necessity."

— Ionel Haidu,

Technical geography as a concept re-emerges to correct the historical trend in geography of adapting rather than developing new methods, technologies, and techniques for conducting geographic research by encouraging trained geographers to pursue this line of inquiry. While the use of the term "technical geography" itself has been debated since at least the 1700s, concepts within technical geography are often separated from the rest of geography when organizing and categorizing subfields in the discipline. Terms such as "techniques of geographic analysis", "geographic information technology", are used synonymously with the term within textbooks.

Geographic information science and technology body of knowledge

As technology such as GIS began to dominate geography departments, the need to develop new curriculum to teach the fundamental concepts became apparent. In response to this in 2006 the UCGIS published Geographic Information Science and Technology Body of Knowledge (GISTBoK), building on the "Model curricula" of the mid 90s. The GISTBoK is designed to inform curriculum teaching GIS and other geospatial technologies. This book is noted as having expanded the term "GIScience" to "GIScience and technology" (GIS&T).

UNESCO Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems

In 2009, UNESCO Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) employed the term technical geography to organize their literature related to geography, establishing a three-branch model of technical, human, and physical geography, referring to human and physical as the primary two. The benefit of this wording is that it is consistent with the other two branches and clearly places the discipline within geography. The categorization of technical geography in the EOLSS as a branch is expanded upon by Ionel Haidu in his 2016 paper What is technical geography as being a consequence of cartography shifting from simply producing maps to producing spatial information, influenced by a culmination of information theory and technology like the World Wide Web.

Sub-branches

• Technical geography can be divided into many broad categories, such as:
• Geodesign
• Geodesy
• Geoinformatics
• Geographic information science
• Geomatics
• Statistical geography
• Spatial analysis
• Time geography
• Quantitative geography
• Qualitative geography

Techniques and tools

• Technical geography employs, and has developed, many techniques and technologies, such as:
• Cartography
• Geographic information systems
• Geostatistics
• Geovisualization
• Global Positioning System
• Map algebra
• Photogrammetry
• Remote sensing
• Surveying

Controversy, and criticism

Ontological

Attempts at subdividing geography have often been met with criticism. Geography has a history spanning cultures and thousands of years and is described as a "mother science" from which more specialized disciplines emerge, resulting in a fragmented discipline. Other existing models to subdivide the discipline of geography into categories and focuses, including William Pattison's four traditions of geography, vary dramatically between publications and cultures. While the term technical geography has been put forward as a distinct branch and umbrella for these wider concepts, the terms used to describe the study of spatial information as a distinct category vary. When subdividing the discipline within the literature, similar categories—such as "the Spatial Tradition", "techniques of geographic analysis", "geographic information and analysis", "geographic information technology", "geography methods and techniques", "geographic information technology", "scientific geography", and "quantitative geography"—are used to describe the same, or similar, concepts as technical geography. Some of the discrepancy in terminology is due to different cultures and languages having their own method of organization; for example, the term "information geography" is popular in research from China to describe similar concepts. It is closely associated with and sometimes used interchangeably with, the subfields of geographic information science and geoinformatics. Each term has slightly differing definitions and scopes, and the best word choice has been debated in the literature since at least the 1700s when Cave defended the use of technical geography over practical geography. However, many of these alternative terms or phrases are "grammatically awkward" and do not link the discipline explicitly as a branch of geography in the same way as technical geography. This is an area of active scholarly debate, and any word choice will be inevitably met with criticism by others using a different model.

More controversially, others deny the idea that the thought and techniques of geography constitute a new branch. This argument asserts that geography must be applied and, therefore, must focus on some subset of human or physical geography. They also argue that there is not enough well-established peer-reviewed literature to back the term as a new branch.

Gender bias

Some have brought allegations that the culture in technical geography has introduced gender bias into geography departments as the discipline is disproportionately practiced by men and seen by some as more masculine. Nadine Schuurman states that while there is not one reason for this discrepancy, but may be related to the broader perception of science as a "masculine domain", and the perception that tools, like GIS, employed by technical geographers are part of the military-industrial complex.

Academic programs

Many academic institutions use, or have historically used, the term "technical geography" to either sub-divide their department or describe courses and content offered within their department. These include, but are not limited to:

• Babeș-Bolyai University
• California State University, Long Beach
• Century College
• College of DuPage
• Everett Community College
• Grossmont College
• Jacksonville University
• Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
• Northwest Missouri State University
• Oregon State University
• South Dakota State University
• Southern Utah University
• Tennessee State University
• University of Mary Washington
• University of Maryland
• University of Peshawar
• University of Saskatchewan
• University of South Alabama
• Portland Community College
• Weber State University

See also

• Areography (geography of Mars) – Delineation and characterization of Martian regionsPages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
• Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography – Series of geography texts, 1975–1996
• History of cartography – Evolution of the art and science of mapmaking
• List of geographers
• Map communication model
• Neogeography – Amateur-focused geography
• Planetary science – Science of planets and planetary systems
• Scientific Geography Series – Series of geography publications, 1985–1988
• Technical communication – Field of communication of technical information
  • Technical drawing – Creation of standards and the technical drawings
  • Technical writing – Type of written communication

Notes

1. While Cave published the "Geography reformed: a new system of general geography, according to an accurate analysis of the science in four parts", how much he wrote or edited is unclear. Other authors are not given within the text.
2. The 1917 English review article is unclear on what was included in these British technical geography courses.

References

1. Haidu, Ionel (2016). "What is Technical Geography – a letter from the editor". Geographia Technica. 11: 1–5. doi:10.21163/GT_2016.111.01.
2. Sala, Maria (2009). Geography Volume I (1 ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom: EOLSS UNESCO. ISBN 978-1-84826-960-6.
3. Tambassi, Timothy (2021). The Philosophy of Geo-Ontologies (2 ed.). Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-78144-6.
4. Dada, Anup (December 2022). "The Process of Geomorphology Related to Sub Branches of Physical Geography". Black Sea Journal of Scientific Research. 59 (3): 1–2. doi:10.36962/GBSSJAR/59.3.004 (inactive 1 November 2024).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
5. Drake, Dawn M.; Elias, Ashley; Ganong, Carissa; Grantham, Michael L.; Mills, Mark S. (May 2022). "Transforming the Applied Learning Experience Through Interdisciplinary Fieldwork" (PDF). The Geographical Bulletin. 63 (2). ISSN 2163-5900. Retrieved 4 August 2023.
6. Sala, Maria (2009). GEOGRAPHY – Vol. I: Geography (PDF). EOLSS UNESCO. Retrieved 30 December 2022.
7. Cave, Edward (1749). Geography reformed: a new system of general geography, according to an accurate analysis of the science in four parts. The whole illustrated with notes (2 ed.). London: Edward Cave.
8. Lin, Yuancheng; Wang, Min; Lei, Junchao; He, Huiyan (3 August 2023). "Perception and Interaction of Urban Medical Space from the Perspective of Technical Geography: A Case Study of Guangzhou, China". Journal of Urban Planning and Development. 149 (4). doi:10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4432. S2CID 260653708.
9. Arabi, Mouhaman; Ngwa, Moise (March 2019). "Modeling the Relationship Between Weather Parameters and Cholera in the City of Maroua, Far North Region, Cameroon". Geographia Technica. 14(1):1–13 (1): 1–13. doi:10.21163/GT_2019.141.01.
10. Boehm, Richard G.; Peters, Samantha (2008). Careers/Jobs in Geography:Business Cards of Department Graduates (PDF) (sixth ed.). Texas State University San Marcos. Retrieved 8 November 2023.
11. Kretzschmar Jr., William A. (24 October 2013). Schlüter, Julia; Krug, Manfred (eds.). Research Methods in Language Variation and Change: Computer mapping of language data. Cambridge University Press. p. 53. ISBN 9781107469846.
12. Monmonier, Mark (1985). Technological Transition in Cartography (1 ed.). Univ of Wisconsin. ISBN 0299100707.
13. Chilès, Jean-Paul; Desassis, Nicolas (2018). "29 Fifty Years of Kriging". In Sagar, B. S. Daya; Agterberg, Frits; Cheng, Qiuming (eds.). Handbook of Mathematical Geosciences. SpringerOpen. p. 589. ISBN 978-3-319-78998-9.
14. Holler, Joseph (2019). "Human Geography with Open Gis as a Transformative Introductory Higher Education Course". The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. 4214: 99–106. Bibcode:2019ISPAr4214...99H. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W14-99-2019.
15. Bello, Innocent E. (October 2023). "Critical Issues in the Methods of Data Collection in Geoinformatics and Environmental Sciences". International Journal of Social Sciences and Management Research. 9 (8): 18–28. doi:10.56201/ijssmr.v9.no8.2023.pg18.28.
16. Fitzgerald, Joseph H. "Map Printing Methods". Archived from the original on 4 June 2007. Retrieved 9 June 2007.
17. Journel, A. G.; Huijbregts, C. J. (1978). Mining Geostatistics. London: Academic Press. ISBN 0-12-391050-1.
18. Richmond, A. (2003). "Financially Efficient Ore Selections Incorporating Grade Uncertainty". Mathematical Geology. 35 (2): 195–215. Bibcode:2003MatG...35..195R. doi:10.1023/A:1023239606028. S2CID 116703619.
19. Barris, J.; Garcia Almirall, P. (2010). "A density function of the appraisal value" (PDF). European Real Estate Society.
20. Ormeling, Ferjan (2009). GEOGRAPHY – Vol. II: Technical Geography Core concepts in the mapping sciences (PDF). EOLSS UNESCO. p. 482. ISBN 978-1-84826-960-6.
21. Goodchild, Michael F. (1986). Spatial Autocorrelation (PDF). Geo Books. ISBN 0-86094-223-6.
22. Mitchell, David J; Dujon, Antoine M; Beckmann, Christa; Biro, Peter (1 November 2019). "Temporal autocorrelation: a neglected factor in the study of behavioral repeatability and plasticity". Behavioral Ecology. 31 (1): 222–231. doi:10.1093/beheco/arz180. hdl:10536/DRO/DU:30135712.
23. Gao, Yong; Cheng, Jing; Meng, Haohan; Liu, Yu (2019). "Measuring spatio-temporal autocorrelation in time series data of collective human mobility". Geo-spatial Information Science. 22 (3): 166–173. Bibcode:2019GSIS...22..166G. doi:10.1080/10095020.2019.1643609.
24. Mitchell, Andy (2005). The ESRI Guide to GIS Analysis, Volume 2 (1 ed.). Esri Press. ISBN 978-1589481169.
25. Kenney, J. F.; Keeping, E. S. (1962). Mathematics of Statistics, Part 1 (3rd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
26. Gardiner, V.; Gardiner, G. (1979). Analysis of Frequency Distributions (PDF). ISBN 0-902246-98-4.
27. Thrift, Nigel (2009). Key Concepts in Geography: Space, The Fundamental Stuff of Geography (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. pp. 85–96. ISBN 978-1-4051-9146-3.
28. Taylor, Peter (2009). Key Concepts in Geography: Time, From Hegemonic Change to Everyday life (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. pp. 140–152. ISBN 978-1-4051-9146-3.
29. Thrift, Nigel (1977). An Introduction to Time-Geography. Geo Abstracts, University of East Anglia. ISBN 0-90224667-4.
30. Sitwell, O.F.G. (1993). Four Centuries of Special Geography. Vancouver, BC: UBCPress. p. 242. ISBN 0-7748-0444-0. Retrieved 4 January 2024.
31. Martin, Lawrence (1930). "The Michigan-Wisconsin Boundary Case in the Supreme Court of the United States, 1923–26". Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 20 (3): 105–163. JSTOR 2560596. Retrieved 1 February 2023.
32. Gee, Emma (2020). Mapping the Afterlife: From Homer to Dante. Oxford University Press. p. 52. ISBN 9780190670498. Retrieved 20 March 2024.
33. Brentjes, Sonja (2009). "Cartography in Islamic Societies". International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Elsevier. pp. 414–427. ISBN 978-0-08-044911-1. Retrieved 29 January 2024.
34. Scheiner, Jens; Toral, Isabel (28 Jul 2022). Baghdād: From Its Beginnings to the 14th Century. BRILL. p. 804. ISBN 978-90-04-51337-2. Retrieved 14 December 2023.
35. "Art of Teaching". School and Home Education. 9 (1): 108. September 1889. Retrieved 4 January 2024.
36. Hurlbut, George C. (1890). "Geographical notes". Journal of the American Geographical Society of New York. 22: 599–620. doi:10.2307/196643. JSTOR 196643. Retrieved 24 March 2024.
37. Holdich, T. H. (1902). "The progress of geographical knowledge". Scottish Geographical Magazine. 18 (10): 505–525. doi:10.1080/00369220208733393. Retrieved 1 February 2023.
38. Hubbard, George D. (1908). "College Geography". Educational Review: 381–400. Retrieved 4 January 2024.
39. Tower, Walter S. (1910). "Scientific Geography: The Relation of Its Content to Its Subdivisions". Bulletin of the American Geographical Society. 42 (11): 801–825. doi:10.2307/199630. JSTOR 199630. Retrieved 18 January 2024.
40. "Technical Geography – an International Journal for the progress of Scientific Geography: Aims and Scopes". Geographia Technica. "Geographia Technica" Association. Retrieved 1 January 2023.
41. Bamford, C. G; Robinson, H. (1986). Scientific and Technical Geography of the European Economic Community. Prentice Hall Press. ISBN 0582988845.
42. A Secondary Schoolmaster (1917). "A Reform School". The English Review. 64 (7): 331–337. ProQuest 2421484. Retrieved 1 February 2023.
43. Jensen, J. Granville (1990). "Geography at Oregon State University". Association of Pacific Coast Geographers Yearbook (PDF). pp. 153–164. Retrieved 29 September 2023.
44. "The 'Quantitative Revolution'", GG3012(NS) Lecture 4, University of Aberdeen, 2011, webpage:AB12.
45. Gregory, Derek; Johnston, Ron; Pratt, Geraldine; Watts, Michael J.; Whatmore, Sarah (2009). The Dictionary of Human Geography (5th ed.). US & UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 611–12.
46. Jenks, George (1953). "An Improved Curriculum for Cartographic Training at the College and University Level". Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 43 (4): 317–331. doi:10.2307/2560899. JSTOR 2560899. Retrieved 30 January 2023.
47. Ackerman, E.A. (1945). "Geographic training, wartime research, and immediate professional objectives". Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 35 (4): 121–43. doi:10.1080/00045604509357271.--as cited in Johnston, Ron and Sideway James (2016). Geography and Geographers: Anglo-American Human Geography since 1945 (7th ed). New York: Routledge.
48. Honeybone, R. C.; Sugden, J. C. G; Wallace, W. (1958). "Geography and Technical Education". The Geographical Journal. 124 (2): 232–234. Bibcode:1958GeogJ.124..232.. doi:10.2307/1790251. JSTOR 1790251. Retrieved 30 December 2022.
49. Hartshorne, Richard (1954). "Comment on 'Exceptionalism in geography'". Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 38 (1): 108–9. doi:10.2307/2561120. JSTOR 2561120.--as cited in Johnston, Ron and Sideway James (2016). Geography and Geographers: Anglo-American Human Geography since 1945 (7th ed). New York: Routledge.
50. Hartshorne, Richard (1955). "'Exceptionalism in Geography' re-examined". Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 45: 205–44. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1955.tb01671.x.--as cited in Johnston, Ron and Sideway James (2016). Geography and Geographers: Anglo-American Human Geography since 1945 (7th ed). New York: Routledge.
51. Hartshorne, Richard (1958). "The concept of geography as a science of space from Kant and Humboldt to Hettner". Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 48 (2): 97–108. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1958.tb01562.x.--as cited in Johnston, Ron and Sideway James (2016). Geography and Geographers: Anglo-American Human Geography since 1945 (7th ed). New York: Routledge.
52. Hartshorne, Richard (1959). Perspective on the Nature of Geography. Chicago: Rand McNally.--as cited in Johnston, Ron and Sideway James (2016). Geography and Geographers: Anglo-American Human Geography since 1945 (7th ed). New York: Routledge.
53. White, Travis M. (2018). "The George F. Jenks Map Collection". Cartographic Perspectives. 91 (91). doi:10.14714/CP91.1516. Retrieved 4 April 2024.
54. Crampton, Jeremy W.; Krygier, John (2005). "An Introduction to Critical Cartography". ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies. 4 (1). Retrieved 30 January 2023.
55. Johnston, Ron; Sidaway, James (2016). Geography & Geographers: Anglo-American Human Geography since 1945 (7th ed.). New York: Routledge. pp. 64–76.
56. Gregory, Derek; Johnston, Ron; Pratt, Geraldine; Watts, Michael J.; Whatmore, Robert (2009). The Dictionary of Human Geography (5th ed.). USA & UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 611–12.
57. Baker, Robert (2009). Geography Volume I: Modeling Geographic Systems and Prediction (1 ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom: EOLSS UNESCO. ISBN 978-1-84826-960-6.
58. Dorling, Danny; Hennig, Benjamin (2018). "Waldo Tobler: Remembering a genius". The Cartographic Journal. 55 (3): 303–304. Bibcode:2018CartJ..55..303D. doi:10.1080/00087041.2018.1507181. Retrieved 13 January 2024.
59. DeLyser, Dydia; Herbert, Steve; Aitken, Stuart; Crang, Mike; McDowell, Linda (November 2009). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Geography (1 ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN 9781412919913. Retrieved 27 April 2023.
60. Walker, Robert Toovey (28 Apr 2021). "Geography, Von Thünen, and Tobler's first law: Tracing the evolution of a concept". Geographical Review. 112 (4): 591–607. doi:10.1080/00167428.2021.1906670. S2CID 233620037.
61. Tobler, Waldo (1970). "A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region" (PDF). Economic Geography. 46: 234–240. doi:10.2307/143141. JSTOR 143141. S2CID 34085823. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 March 2019. Retrieved 22 July 2022.
62. Tobler, Waldo (2004). "On the First Law of Geography: A Reply". Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 94 (2): 304–310. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09402009.x. S2CID 33201684. Retrieved 10 March 2022.
63. Goodchild, Michael (2004). "The Validity and Usefulness of Laws in Geographic Information Science and Geography". Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 94 (2): 300–303. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09402008.x. S2CID 17912938.
64. Arbia, Giuseppe; Benedetti, R.; Espa, G. (1996). ""Effects of MAUP on image classification"". Journal of Geographical Systems. 3: 123–141.
65. Smith, Peter (2005). "The laws of geography". Teaching Geography. 30 (3): 150.
66. Clarke, Keith C.; Cloud, John G. (2000). "On the Origins of Analytical Cartography". Cartography and Geographic Information Science. 27 (3): 195–204. Bibcode:2000CGISc..27..195C. doi:10.1559/152304000783547821. S2CID 7501501. Retrieved 25 January 2024.
67. Krawczyk, Artur (9 November 2022). "Proposal of Redefinition of the Terms Geomatics and Geoinformatics on the Basis of Terminological Postulates". ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 11 (11): Krawczyk. Bibcode:2022IJGI...11..557K. doi:10.3390/ijgi11110557.
68. Bagley, James (1941). Aerophotography and Aerosurverying (1st ed.). York, PA: The Maple Press Company.
69. Walker, F. (1953). Geography from the Air (1 ed.). London: Methuen & Co. LTD.
70. Jensen, John (2016). Introductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective. Glenview, IL: Pearson Education, Inc. p. 623. ISBN 978-0-13-405816-0.
71. Tobler, Waldo (1959). "Automation and Cartography". Geographical Review. 49 (4): 526–534. Bibcode:1959GeoRv..49..526T. doi:10.2307/212211. JSTOR 212211. Retrieved 10 March 2022.
72. "The 50th Anniversary of GIS". ESRI. Retrieved 18 April 2013.
73. St. Martin, Kevin; Wing, John (2007). "The Discourse and Discipline of GIS". Cartographica. 42 (3): 235–248. doi:10.3138/carto.42.3.235.
74. Openshaw, Stan (May 1991). "A View on the GIS Crisis in Geography, or, Using GIS to Put Humpty-Dumpty Back Together Again". Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 23 (5): 621–628. Bibcode:1991EnPlA..23..621O. doi:10.1068/a230621. S2CID 131571153.
75. Goodchild, Michael F (2010). "Twenty years of progress: GIScience in 2010". Journal of Spatial Information Science (1). doi:10.5311/JOSIS.2010.1.2.
76. McElvaney, Shannon (2012). Geodesign: Case Studies in Regional and Urban Planning. Esri Press. ISBN 978-1589483163.
77. Hegarty, Christopher J.; Chatre, Eric (December 2008). "Evolution of the Global Navigation satellite system (GNSS)". Proceedings of the IEEE. 96 (12): 1902–1917. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2008.2006090. S2CID 838848.
78. Dardanelli, Gino; Lo Brutto, Mauro; Pipitone, Claudia (2020). "GNSS CORS Network of the University of Palermo: Design and First Analysis of Data". Geographia Technica. 15 (1): 43–69. doi:10.21163/GT_2020.151.05. hdl:10447/401186. S2CID 215889035.
79. "Russia Launches Three More GLONASS-M Space Vehicles". Inside GNSS. Archived from the original on February 6, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2008.
80. "China launches final satellite in GPS-like Beidou system". phys.org. The Associated Press. June 23, 2020. Archived from the original on June 24, 2020. Retrieved June 24, 2020.
81. "Galileo navigation satellite system goes live". dw.com. Archived from the original on October 18, 2017. Retrieved December 17, 2016.
82. Fotheringham, A. Stewart; Brunsdon, Chris; Charlton, Martin (2000). Quantitative Geography: Perspectives on Spatial Data Analysis. Sage Publications Ltd. ISBN 978-0-7619-5948-9.
83. Miller, Harvey J.; Bridwell, Scott A. (2008). "A Field-Based Theory for Time Geography". Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 99 (1): 49–75. doi:10.1080/00045600802471049. Retrieved 28 May 2024.
84. Murakami, Daisuke; Yamagata, Yoshiki (2020). "Chapter Six – Models in quantitative geography". Spatial Analysis Using Big Data: Methods and Urban Applications. pp. 159–178. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-813127-5.00006-0. ISBN 9780128131275. S2CID 213700891. Retrieved 3 February 2023.
85. Haggett, Peter (16 July 2008). "The Local Shape of Revolution: Reflections on Quantitative Geography at Cambridge in the 1950s and 1960s". Geographical Analysis. 40 (3): 336–352. Bibcode:2008GeoAn..40..336H. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.2008.00731.x. Retrieved 3 February 2023.
86. Juuso, Ilkka; Kretzschmar Jr., William A. (January 2016). "Creation of Regions for Dialect Features Using a Cellular Automaton". Journal of English Linguistics. 44 (1): 4–33. doi:10.1177/0075424215620279. S2CID 130940338. Retrieved 7 January 2023.
87. ISO/TR 19122:2004(en) Geographic information/Geomatics — Qualification and certification of personnel [1]
88. DeMers, Michael (2009). Fundamentals of Geographic Information Systems (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, inc. ISBN 978-0-470-12906-7.
89. Duckham, Matt; Goodchild, Michael F.; Worboys, Michael (2004-11-23). Foundations of Geographic Information Science. CRC Press. p. 4. ISBN 9780203009543.
90. Medina, Richard M.; Hepner, George F. (2013). The Geography of International Terrorism An Introduction to Spaces and Places of Violent Non-State Groups. Taylor & Francis. p. xi. ISBN 9781439886885. Retrieved 16 March 2024.
91. "History". University Consortium for Geographic Information Science. Retrieved 8 January 2024.
92. DiBiase, David; DeMers, Michael; Johnson, Ann; Kemp, Karen; Luck, Ann Taylor; Plewe, Brandon; Wentz, Elizabeth (2006). Geographic information science and technology body of knowledge. Association of American Geographers. ISBN 978-0-89291-267-4.
93. Reitsma, Femke (2013). "Revisiting the 'Is GIScience a science?' debate (or quite possibly scientific gerrymandering)". International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 27 (13): 211–221. Bibcode:2013IJGIS..27..211R. doi:10.1080/13658816.2012.674529. S2CID 27150014. Retrieved 20 January 2024.
94. Peet, J. Richard (2020). "Radical Geography". International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (Second Edition): 197–205. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10691-2. ISBN 978-0-08-102296-2. Retrieved 26 May 2024.
95. Castree, Noel (2000). "Professionalisation, Activism, and the University: Whither 'Critical Geography'?". Environment and Planning A. 32 (6): 955–970. Bibcode:2000EnPlA..32..955C. doi:10.1068/a3263.
96. Peet, Richard (2000). "Celebrating Thirty Years of Radical Geography". Environment and Planning A. 32 (6): 951–953. Bibcode:2000EnPlA..32..951P. doi:10.1068/a32202. S2CID 128738768.
97. Graf, W. (1998). "Why Physical Geographers Whine so Much". The Association of American Geographers' Newsletter. 33 (8).
98. Kwan, Mei-Po (2004). "Beyond Difference: From Canonical Geography to Hybrid Geographies". Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 94 (4): 756–763. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.00432.x.
99. Schuurman, Nadine (28 June 2008). "Women and technology in geography: a cyborg manifesto for GIS". Canadian Geographer. 46 (3): 258–265. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0064.2002.tb00748.x. Retrieved 7 January 2023.
100. Tuan, Yi-Fu (1991). "A View of Geography". Geographical Review. 81 (1): 99–107. Bibcode:1991GeoRv..81...99T. doi:10.2307/215179. JSTOR 215179. Retrieved 5 January 2023.
101. Melgaço, Lucas; Prouse, Carolyn (2017). "Milton Santos and the Centrality of the Periphery". In Melgaço, Lucas; Prouse, Carolyn; Brauch, Hans Günter (eds.). Milton Santos: A Pioneer in Critical Geography from the Global South (1 ed.). Springer. pp. 5–10. ISBN 978-3-319-53825-9.
102. Hepple, L. (1998). "Context, Social Construction and Statistics: Regression, Social Science and Human geography". Environment and Planning A. 30 (2): 225–234. Bibcode:1998EnPlA..30..225H. doi:10.1068/a300225. S2CID 144335512.
103. "Geographia Technica Volume 1" (PDF). Geographia Technica. 1 (2). 2006. Retrieved 1 January 2023.
104. Getis, Arthur; Bjelland, Mark; Getis, Victoria (2018). Introduction to Geography (15 ed.). McGraw Hill. ISBN 978-1-259-57000-1.
105. Dahlman, Carl; Renwick, William (2013). Introduction to Geography: People, Places & Environment (6th ed.). Pearson. ISBN 978-0321843333.
106. National Research Council (1997). Rediscovering Geography: New Relevance for Science and Society (1997). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. p. 259. ISBN 978-0-309-05199-6. Retrieved 21 May 2023.
107. Lemmens, Mathias (April 2001). "Education: Surveying the Issues". Surveying World: 36–38.
108. D'Alessandro-Scarpari, Cristina; Elmes, Gregory; Miller, Jennifer; Weiner, Daniel (2016). "Book Review: Geography and technology". Progress in Human Geography. 30 (5): 675–677. doi:10.1177/0309132506070191. S2CID 128681685.
109. Pattison, William (1964). "The Four Traditions of Geography". Journal of Geography. 63 (5): 211–216. Bibcode:1964JGeog..63..211P. doi:10.1080/00221346408985265. Retrieved 27 August 2022.
110. Li, Xin; Zheng, Donghai; Feng, Min; Chen, Fahu (November 2021). "Information geography: The information revolution reshapes geography". Science China Earth Sciences. 65 (2): 379–382. doi:10.1007/s11430-021-9857-5. S2CID 243866306.
111. Mark, David (2003). Foundations of geographic information science. London and New York: Taylor & Francis. ISBN 0-203-00954-1.
112. Fundamentals of Physical Geography: Geography as a Discipline (1 ed.). New Delhi: National Council of Educational Research and Training. 2006. pp. 1–12. ISBN 81-7450-518-0.
113. Gatrell, A C; Bracken, I J (1985). "Reviews: Central Place Theory, Gravity and Spatial Interaction Models, Industrial Location, Scientific Geography Series, Computer-Assisted Cartography: Principles and Prospects". Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. 12 (4): 493–496. Bibcode:1985EnPlB..12..493G. doi:10.1068/b120493. S2CID 131269013.
114. A. Stewart, Fotheringham (May 2, 2000). Quantitative Geography: Perspectives on Spatial Data Analysis (1 ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd. ISBN 0761959483.
115. Couclelis, Helen (March 2017). "Ontology: Theoretical Perspectives". International Encyclopedia of Geography: People, the Earth, Environment and Technology: 1–11. doi:10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0680. ISBN 9780470659632.
116. Lake, Ron; Burggraf, David; Trninic, Milan; Rae, Laurie (2004). Geography Mark-Up Language: Foundation for the Geo-Web (1 ed.). John Wiley and Sons Inc. ISBN 0-470-87154-7.
117. Collins, Eric (15 February 2016). "What is the Difference Between Geomatics and Geography?". Geomatics Canada. Retrieved 7 January 2024.
118. Pujol, Hermínia; Ramon, M. Dolors Garcia; Ortiz, Anna (2012). "Academic careers in Spanish geography: a gender perspective". Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles. 59: 465–467.
119. Man, Titus. "Faculty of Geography". Babeș-Bolyai University. Retrieved 5 July 2023.
120. "Department of Geography". California State University, Long Beach, Geography, Archive. Retrieved 29 September 2023.
121. "Geography". Century College. Retrieved 29 September 2023.
122. "Geography Program: Degrees". College of DuPage. Retrieved 11 October 2023.
123. "Geography". Everett Community College. Retrieved 11 October 2023.
124. "Careers in Geography". Grossmont College. Retrieved 11 October 2023.
125. "Environmental Planning: Available Minors". Jacksonville University. Retrieved 25 November 2023.
126. "Geography and Geography Education: Two Faces of the Same Coin". Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Retrieved 25 May 2024.
127. "Major in Geography". Northwest Missouri State University. Retrieved 9 May 2024.
128. "Geography and Geospatial Sciences: Undergraduate Program – Geography". South Dakota State University. Retrieved 28 January 2023.
129. "Geography at SUU". Southern Utah University. Retrieved 29 September 2023.
130. "Geography Minor". Tennessee State University. Retrieved 29 September 2023.
131. "Geography". University of Mary Washington. Retrieved 29 September 2023.
132. "Department of Geographical Sciences: Course list". University of Maryland. Retrieved 28 January 2023.
133. "introduction". Department of Geography and Geomatics (GIS and Remote Sensing). University of Peshawar. Retrieved 30 January 2024.
134. "U of Saskatchewan to U of Regina". transfer credits. University of Regina. Retrieved 30 January 2024.
135. "Bachelor of Science Four-year (B.Sc. Four-year)". Geology. University of Saskatchewan. Retrieved 30 January 2024.
136. Petroniro, Elise (2006). "Mosquitoes and Map Design" (PDF). Cartouche:Newsletter of the Canadian Cartographic Association. 64: 8. Retrieved 30 January 2024.
137. "Geography Advising Guide". University of Southern Alabama. Retrieved 29 September 2023.
138. "GEO Curriculum". University of Southern Alabama. Retrieved 29 September 2023.
139. "Technical Geography Courses". Portland Community college. Retrieved 28 January 2023.
140. "Geography". Weber State University. Retrieved 29 September 2023.