![Parabola](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly91cGxvYWQud2lraW1lZGlhLm9yZy93aWtpcGVkaWEvY29tbW9ucy90aHVtYi9mL2Y0L1BhcnRzX29mX1BhcmFib2xhLnN2Zy8xNjAwcHgtUGFydHNfb2ZfUGFyYWJvbGEuc3ZnLnBuZw==.png )
In mathematics, a parabola is a plane curve which is mirror-symmetrical and is approximately U-shaped. It fits several superficially different mathematical descriptions, which can all be proved to define exactly the same curves.
![image](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nbGlzaC5uaW5hLmF6L3dpa2lwZWRpYS9pbWFnZS9hSFIwY0hNNkx5OTFjR3h2WVdRdWQybHJhVzFsWkdsaExtOXlaeTkzYVd0cGNHVmthV0V2WTI5dGJXOXVjeTkwYUhWdFlpOW1MMlkwTDFCaGNuUnpYMjltWDFCaGNtRmliMnhoTG5OMlp5OHpNREJ3ZUMxUVlYSjBjMTl2Wmw5UVlYSmhZbTlzWVM1emRtY3VjRzVuLnBuZw==.png)
![image](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nbGlzaC5uaW5hLmF6L3dpa2lwZWRpYS9pbWFnZS9hSFIwY0hNNkx5OTFjR3h2WVdRdWQybHJhVzFsWkdsaExtOXlaeTkzYVd0cGNHVmthV0V2WTI5dGJXOXVjeTkwYUhWdFlpOHhMekV4TDBOdmJtbGpYMU5sWTNScGIyNXpMbk4yWnk4eU1qQndlQzFEYjI1cFkxOVRaV04wYVc5dWN5NXpkbWN1Y0c1bi5wbmc=.png)
One description of a parabola involves a point (the focus) and a line (the directrix). The focus does not lie on the directrix. The parabola is the locus of points in that plane that are equidistant from the directrix and the focus. Another description of a parabola is as a conic section, created from the intersection of a right circular conical surface and a plane parallel to another plane that is tangential to the conical surface.
The graph of a quadratic function (with ) is a parabola with its axis parallel to the y-axis. Conversely, every such parabola is the graph of a quadratic function.
The line perpendicular to the directrix and passing through the focus (that is, the line that splits the parabola through the middle) is called the "axis of symmetry". The point where the parabola intersects its axis of symmetry is called the "vertex" and is the point where the parabola is most sharply curved. The distance between the vertex and the focus, measured along the axis of symmetry, is the "focal length". The "latus rectum" is the chord of the parabola that is parallel to the directrix and passes through the focus. Parabolas can open up, down, left, right, or in some other arbitrary direction. Any parabola can be repositioned and rescaled to fit exactly on any other parabola—that is, all parabolas are geometrically similar.
Parabolas have the property that, if they are made of material that reflects light, then light that travels parallel to the axis of symmetry of a parabola and strikes its concave side is reflected to its focus, regardless of where on the parabola the reflection occurs. Conversely, light that originates from a point source at the focus is reflected into a parallel ("collimated") beam, leaving the parabola parallel to the axis of symmetry. The same effects occur with sound and other waves. This reflective property is the basis of many practical uses of parabolas.
The parabola has many important applications, from a parabolic antenna or parabolic microphone to automobile headlight reflectors and the design of ballistic missiles. It is frequently used in physics, engineering, and many other areas.
History
The earliest known work on conic sections was by Menaechmus in the 4th century BC. He discovered a way to solve the problem of doubling the cube using parabolas. (The solution, however, does not meet the requirements of compass-and-straightedge construction.) The area enclosed by a parabola and a line segment, the so-called "parabola segment", was computed by Archimedes by the method of exhaustion in the 3rd century BC, in his The Quadrature of the Parabola. The name "parabola" is due to Apollonius, who discovered many properties of conic sections. It means "application", referring to "application of areas" concept, that has a connection with this curve, as Apollonius had proved. The focus–directrix property of the parabola and other conic sections was mentioned in the works of Pappus.
Galileo showed that the path of a projectile follows a parabola, a consequence of uniform acceleration due to gravity.
The idea that a parabolic reflector could produce an image was already well known before the invention of the reflecting telescope. Designs were proposed in the early to mid-17th century by many mathematicians, including René Descartes, Marin Mersenne, and James Gregory. When Isaac Newton built the first reflecting telescope in 1668, he skipped using a parabolic mirror because of the difficulty of fabrication, opting for a spherical mirror. Parabolic mirrors are used in most modern reflecting telescopes and in satellite dishes and radar receivers.
Definition as a locus of points
A parabola can be defined geometrically as a set of points (locus of points) in the Euclidean plane:
The midpoint of the perpendicular from the focus
onto the directrix
is called the vertex, and the line
is the axis of symmetry of the parabola.
In a Cartesian coordinate system
Axis of symmetry parallel to the y axis
![image](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nbGlzaC5uaW5hLmF6L3dpa2lwZWRpYS9pbWFnZS9hSFIwY0hNNkx5OTFjR3h2WVdRdWQybHJhVzFsWkdsaExtOXlaeTkzYVd0cGNHVmthV0V2WTI5dGJXOXVjeTkwYUhWdFlpODJMelk0TDFCaGNtRmlaV3d0WkdWbUxYQXRkaTV6ZG1jdk1qSXdjSGd0VUdGeVlXSmxiQzFrWldZdGNDMTJMbk4yWnk1d2JtYz0ucG5n.png)
If one introduces Cartesian coordinates, such that and the directrix has the equation
, one obtains for a point
from
the equation
. Solving for
yields
This parabola is U-shaped (opening to the top).
The horizontal chord through the focus (see picture in opening section) is called the latus rectum; one half of it is the semi-latus rectum. The latus rectum is parallel to the directrix. The semi-latus rectum is designated by the letter . From the picture one obtains
The latus rectum is defined similarly for the other two conics – the ellipse and the hyperbola. The latus rectum is the line drawn through a focus of a conic section parallel to the directrix and terminated both ways by the curve. For any case, is the radius of the osculating circle at the vertex. For a parabola, the semi-latus rectum,
, is the distance of the focus from the directrix. Using the parameter
, the equation of the parabola can be rewritten as
More generally, if the vertex is , the focus
, and the directrix
, one obtains the equation
Remarks:
- In the case of
the parabola has a downward opening.
- The presumption that the axis is parallel to the y axis allows one to consider a parabola as the graph of a polynomial of degree 2, and conversely: the graph of an arbitrary polynomial of degree 2 is a parabola (see next section).
- If one exchanges
and
, one obtains equations of the form
. These parabolas open to the left (if
) or to the right (if
).
General position
![image](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nbGlzaC5uaW5hLmF6L3dpa2lwZWRpYS9pbWFnZS9hSFIwY0hNNkx5OTFjR3h2WVdRdWQybHJhVzFsWkdsaExtOXlaeTkzYVd0cGNHVmthV0V2WTI5dGJXOXVjeTkwYUhWdFlpODBMelF3TDFCaGNtRmlaV3d0WVdKakxuTjJaeTh5TWpCd2VDMVFZWEpoWW1Wc0xXRmlZeTV6ZG1jdWNHNW4ucG5n.png)
If the focus is , and the directrix
, then one obtains the equation
(the left side of the equation uses the Hesse normal form of a line to calculate the distance ).
For a parametric equation of a parabola in general position see § As the affine image of the unit parabola.
The implicit equation of a parabola is defined by an irreducible polynomial of degree two: such that
or, equivalently, such that
is the square of a linear polynomial.
As a graph of a function
![image](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nbGlzaC5uaW5hLmF6L3dpa2lwZWRpYS9pbWFnZS9hSFIwY0hNNkx5OTFjR3h2WVdRdWQybHJhVzFsWkdsaExtOXlaeTkzYVd0cGNHVmthV0V2WTI5dGJXOXVjeTkwYUhWdFlpOWlMMkk1TDFCaGNtRmlaV3h1TFhaaGNpMXpMbk4yWnk4eU1qQndlQzFRWVhKaFltVnNiaTEyWVhJdGN5NXpkbWN1Y0c1bi5wbmc=.png)
The previous section shows that any parabola with the origin as vertex and the y axis as axis of symmetry can be considered as the graph of a function
For the parabolas are opening to the top, and for
are opening to the bottom (see picture). From the section above one obtains:
- The focus is
,
- the focal length
, the semi-latus rectum is
,
- the vertex is
,
- the directrix has the equation
,
- the tangent at point
has the equation
.
For the parabola is the unit parabola with equation
. Its focus is
, the semi-latus rectum
, and the directrix has the equation
.
The general function of degree 2 is Completing the square yields
which is the equation of a parabola with
- the axis
(parallel to the y axis),
- the focal length
, the semi-latus rectum
,
- the vertex
,
- the focus
,
- the directrix
,
- the point of the parabola intersecting the y axis has coordinates
,
- the tangent at a point on the y axis has the equation
.
Similarity to the unit parabola
![image](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nbGlzaC5uaW5hLmF6L3dpa2lwZWRpYS9pbWFnZS9hSFIwY0hNNkx5OTFjR3h2WVdRdWQybHJhVzFsWkdsaExtOXlaeTkzYVd0cGNHVmthV0V2WTI5dGJXOXVjeTkwYUhWdFlpODFMelV6TDFCaGNtRmlaV3d0YzJOaGJESXVjM1puTHpJeU1IQjRMVkJoY21GaVpXd3RjMk5oYkRJdWMzWm5MbkJ1Wnc9PS5wbmc=.png)
Two objects in the Euclidean plane are similar if one can be transformed to the other by a similarity, that is, an arbitrary composition of rigid motions (translations and rotations) and uniform scalings.
A parabola with vertex
can be transformed by the translation
to one with the origin as vertex. A suitable rotation around the origin can then transform the parabola to one that has the y axis as axis of symmetry. Hence the parabola
can be transformed by a rigid motion to a parabola with an equation
. Such a parabola can then be transformed by the uniform scaling
into the unit parabola with equation
. Thus, any parabola can be mapped to the unit parabola by a similarity.
A synthetic approach, using similar triangles, can also be used to establish this result.
The general result is that two conic sections (necessarily of the same type) are similar if and only if they have the same eccentricity. Therefore, only circles (all having eccentricity 0) share this property with parabolas (all having eccentricity 1), while general ellipses and hyperbolas do not.
There are other simple affine transformations that map the parabola onto the unit parabola, such as
. But this mapping is not a similarity, and only shows that all parabolas are affinely equivalent (see § As the affine image of the unit parabola).
As a special conic section
![image](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nbGlzaC5uaW5hLmF6L3dpa2lwZWRpYS9pbWFnZS9hSFIwY0hNNkx5OTFjR3h2WVdRdWQybHJhVzFsWkdsaExtOXlaeTkzYVd0cGNHVmthV0V2WTI5dGJXOXVjeTkwYUhWdFlpODNMemMwTDB0bFoyVnNjMk5vYm1sMGRDMXpZMmhoY2kxbGRpNXpkbWN2TWpJd2NIZ3RTMlZuWld4elkyaHVhWFIwTFhOamFHRnlMV1YyTG5OMlp5NXdibWM9LnBuZw==.png)
The pencil of conic sections with the x axis as axis of symmetry, one vertex at the origin (0, 0) and the same semi-latus rectum can be represented by the equation
with
the eccentricity.
- For
the conic is a circle (osculating circle of the pencil),
- for
an ellipse,
- for
the parabola with equation
- for
a hyperbola (see picture).
In polar coordinates
![image](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nbGlzaC5uaW5hLmF6L3dpa2lwZWRpYS9pbWFnZS9hSFIwY0hNNkx5OTFjR3h2WVdRdWQybHJhVzFsWkdsaExtOXlaeTkzYVd0cGNHVmthV0V2WTI5dGJXOXVjeTkwYUhWdFlpODJMell5TDB0bFoyVnNjMk5vYm1sMGRITmphR0Z5TFhCdmJHRnlMV1V1YzNabkx6SXlNSEI0TFV0bFoyVnNjMk5vYm1sMGRITmphR0Z5TFhCdmJHRnlMV1V1YzNabkxuQnVadz09LnBuZw==.png)
If p > 0, the parabola with equation (opening to the right) has the polar representation
where
.
Its vertex is , and its focus is
.
If one shifts the origin into the focus, that is, , one obtains the equation
Remark 1: Inverting this polar form shows that a parabola is the inverse of a cardioid.
Remark 2: The second polar form is a special case of a pencil of conics with focus (see picture):
(
is the eccentricity).
Conic section and quadratic form
Diagram, description, and definitions
![image](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nbGlzaC5uaW5hLmF6L3dpa2lwZWRpYS9pbWFnZS9hSFIwY0hNNkx5OTFjR3h2WVdRdWQybHJhVzFsWkdsaExtOXlaeTkzYVd0cGNHVmthV0V2WTI5dGJXOXVjeTkwYUhWdFlpODNMemN6TDFCaGNtRmliMnhwWTE5amIyNXBZMTl6WldOMGFXOXVMbk4yWnk4eU1qQndlQzFRWVhKaFltOXNhV05mWTI5dWFXTmZjMlZqZEdsdmJpNXpkbWN1Y0c1bi5wbmc=.png)
The diagram represents a cone with its axis AV. The point A is its apex. An inclined cross-section of the cone, shown in pink, is inclined from the axis by the same angle θ, as the side of the cone. According to the definition of a parabola as a conic section, the boundary of this pink cross-section EPD is a parabola.
A cross-section perpendicular to the axis of the cone passes through the vertex P of the parabola. This cross-section is circular, but appears elliptical when viewed obliquely, as is shown in the diagram. Its centre is V, and PK is a diameter. We will call its radius r.
Another perpendicular to the axis, circular cross-section of the cone is farther from the apex A than the one just described. It has a chord DE, which joins the points where the parabola intersects the circle. Another chord BC is the perpendicular bisector of DE and is consequently a diameter of the circle. These two chords and the parabola's axis of symmetry PM all intersect at the point M.
All the labelled points, except D and E, are coplanar. They are in the plane of symmetry of the whole figure. This includes the point F, which is not mentioned above. It is defined and discussed below, in § Position of the focus.
Let us call the length of DM and of EM x, and the length of PM y.
Derivation of quadratic equation
The lengths of BM and CM are:
(triangle BPM is isosceles, because
(PMCK is a parallelogram).
Using the intersecting chords theorem on the chords BC and DE, we get
Substituting:
Rearranging:
For any given cone and parabola, r and θ are constants, but x and y are variables that depend on the arbitrary height at which the horizontal cross-section BECD is made. This last equation shows the relationship between these variables. They can be interpreted as Cartesian coordinates of the points D and E, in a system in the pink plane with P as its origin. Since x is squared in the equation, the fact that D and E are on opposite sides of the y axis is unimportant. If the horizontal cross-section moves up or down, toward or away from the apex of the cone, D and E move along the parabola, always maintaining the relationship between x and y shown in the equation. The parabolic curve is therefore the locus of points where the equation is satisfied, which makes it a Cartesian graph of the quadratic function in the equation.
Focal length
It is proved in a preceding section that if a parabola has its vertex at the origin, and if it opens in the positive y direction, then its equation is y = x2/4f, where f is its focal length. Comparing this with the last equation above shows that the focal length of the parabola in the cone is r sin θ.
Position of the focus
In the diagram above, the point V is the foot of the perpendicular from the vertex of the parabola to the axis of the cone. The point F is the foot of the perpendicular from the point V to the plane of the parabola. By symmetry, F is on the axis of symmetry of the parabola. Angle VPF is complementary to θ, and angle PVF is complementary to angle VPF, therefore angle PVF is θ. Since the length of PV is r, the distance of F from the vertex of the parabola is r sin θ. It is shown above that this distance equals the focal length of the parabola, which is the distance from the vertex to the focus. The focus and the point F are therefore equally distant from the vertex, along the same line, which implies that they are the same point. Therefore, the point F, defined above, is the focus of the parabola.
This discussion started from the definition of a parabola as a conic section, but it has now led to a description as a graph of a quadratic function. This shows that these two descriptions are equivalent. They both define curves of exactly the same shape.
Alternative proof with Dandelin spheres
![image](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nbGlzaC5uaW5hLmF6L3dpa2lwZWRpYS9pbWFnZS9hSFIwY0hNNkx5OTFjR3h2WVdRdWQybHJhVzFsWkdsaExtOXlaeTkzYVd0cGNHVmthV0V2WTI5dGJXOXVjeTkwYUhWdFlpODJMell5TDBSaGJtUmxiR2x1TFhCaGNtRmlaV3d1YzNabkx6SXlNSEI0TFVSaGJtUmxiR2x1TFhCaGNtRmlaV3d1YzNabkxuQnVadz09LnBuZw==.png)
An alternative proof can be done using Dandelin spheres. It works without calculation and uses elementary geometric considerations only (see the derivation below).
The intersection of an upright cone by a plane , whose inclination from vertical is the same as a generatrix (a.k.a. generator line, a line containing the apex and a point on the cone surface)
of the cone, is a parabola (red curve in the diagram).
This generatrix is the only generatrix of the cone that is parallel to plane
. Otherwise, if there are two generatrices parallel to the intersecting plane, the intersection curve will be a hyperbola (or degenerate hyperbola, if the two generatrices are in the intersecting plane). If there is no generatrix parallel to the intersecting plane, the intersection curve will be an ellipse or a circle (or a point).
Let plane be the plane that contains the vertical axis of the cone and line
. The inclination of plane
from vertical is the same as line
means that, viewing from the side (that is, the plane
is perpendicular to plane
),
.
In order to prove the directrix property of a parabola (see § Definition as a locus of points above), one uses a Dandelin sphere , which is a sphere that touches the cone along a circle
and plane
at point
. The plane containing the circle
intersects with plane
at line
. There is a mirror symmetry in the system consisting of plane
, Dandelin sphere
and the cone (the plane of symmetry is
).
Since the plane containing the circle is perpendicular to plane
, and
, their intersection line
must also be perpendicular to plane
. Since line
is in plane
,
.
It turns out that is the focus of the parabola, and
is the directrix of the parabola.
- Let
be an arbitrary point of the intersection curve.
- The generatrix of the cone containing
intersects circle
at point
.
- The line segments
and
are tangential to the sphere
, and hence are of equal length.
- Generatrix
intersects the circle
at point
. The line segments
and
are tangential to the sphere
, and hence are of equal length.
- Let line
be the line parallel to
and passing through point
. Since
, and point
is in plane
, line
must be in plane
. Since
, we know that
as well.
- Let point
be the foot of the perpendicular from point
to line
, that is,
is a segment of line
, and hence
.
- From intercept theorem and
we know that
. Since
, we know that
, which means that the distance from
to the focus
is equal to the distance from
to the directrix
.
Proof of the reflective property
![image](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nbGlzaC5uaW5hLmF6L3dpa2lwZWRpYS9pbWFnZS9hSFIwY0hNNkx5OTFjR3h2WVdRdWQybHJhVzFsWkdsaExtOXlaeTkzYVd0cGNHVmthV0V2WTI5dGJXOXVjeTkwYUhWdFlpOHdMekF4TDFCaGNtRmlaV3hmTWk1emRtY3ZNakl3Y0hndFVHRnlZV0psYkY4eUxuTjJaeTV3Ym1jPS5wbmc=.png)
The reflective property states that if a parabola can reflect light, then light that enters it travelling parallel to the axis of symmetry is reflected toward the focus. This is derived from geometrical optics, based on the assumption that light travels in rays.
Consider the parabola y = x2. Since all parabolas are similar, this simple case represents all others.
Construction and definitions
The point E is an arbitrary point on the parabola. The focus is F, the vertex is A (the origin), and the line FA is the axis of symmetry. The line EC is parallel to the axis of symmetry, intersects the x axis at D and intersects the directrix at C. The point B is the midpoint of the line segment FC.
Deductions
The vertex A is equidistant from the focus F and from the directrix. Since C is on the directrix, the y coordinates of F and C are equal in absolute value and opposite in sign. B is the midpoint of FC. Its x coordinate is half that of D, that is, x/2. The slope of the line BE is the quotient of the lengths of ED and BD, which is x2/x/2 = 2x. But 2x is also the slope (first derivative) of the parabola at E. Therefore, the line BE is the tangent to the parabola at E.
The distances EF and EC are equal because E is on the parabola, F is the focus and C is on the directrix. Therefore, since B is the midpoint of FC, triangles △FEB and △CEB are congruent (three sides), which implies that the angles marked α are congruent. (The angle above E is vertically opposite angle ∠BEC.) This means that a ray of light that enters the parabola and arrives at E travelling parallel to the axis of symmetry will be reflected by the line BE so it travels along the line EF, as shown in red in the diagram (assuming that the lines can somehow reflect light). Since BE is the tangent to the parabola at E, the same reflection will be done by an infinitesimal arc of the parabola at E. Therefore, light that enters the parabola and arrives at E travelling parallel to the axis of symmetry of the parabola is reflected by the parabola toward its focus.
This conclusion about reflected light applies to all points on the parabola, as is shown on the left side of the diagram. This is the reflective property.
Other consequences
There are other theorems that can be deduced simply from the above argument.
Tangent bisection property
The above proof and the accompanying diagram show that the tangent BE bisects the angle ∠FEC. In other words, the tangent to the parabola at any point bisects the angle between the lines joining the point to the focus and perpendicularly to the directrix.
Intersection of a tangent and perpendicular from focus
![image](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nbGlzaC5uaW5hLmF6L3dpa2lwZWRpYS9pbWFnZS9hSFIwY0hNNkx5OTFjR3h2WVdRdWQybHJhVzFsWkdsaExtOXlaeTkzYVd0cGNHVmthV0V2WTI5dGJXOXVjeTkwYUhWdFlpOWtMMlEzTDFCaGNtRmliMnhoTFdGdWRHbHdiMlJsY21FdVoybG1Mekl3TUhCNExWQmhjbUZpYjJ4aExXRnVkR2x3YjJSbGNtRXVaMmxtLmdpZg==.gif)
Since triangles △FBE and △CBE are congruent, FB is perpendicular to the tangent BE. Since B is on the x axis, which is the tangent to the parabola at its vertex, it follows that the point of intersection between any tangent to a parabola and the perpendicular from the focus to that tangent lies on the line that is tangential to the parabola at its vertex. See animated diagram and pedal curve.
Reflection of light striking the convex side
If light travels along the line CE, it moves parallel to the axis of symmetry and strikes the convex side of the parabola at E. It is clear from the above diagram that this light will be reflected directly away from the focus, along an extension of the segment FE.
Alternative proofs
![image](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nbGlzaC5uaW5hLmF6L3dpa2lwZWRpYS9pbWFnZS9hSFIwY0hNNkx5OTFjR3h2WVdRdWQybHJhVzFsWkdsaExtOXlaeTkzYVd0cGNHVmthV0V2WTI5dGJXOXVjeTkwYUhWdFlpODFMelZqTDFCaGNpVkRNeVZCTVdKdmJHRmZlVjkwWVc1blpXNTBaUzF3Y25WbFltRXVjM1puTHpJd01IQjRMVkJoY2lWRE15VkJNV0p2YkdGZmVWOTBZVzVuWlc1MFpTMXdjblZsWW1FdWMzWm5MbkJ1Wnc9PS5wbmc=.png)
The above proofs of the reflective and tangent bisection properties use a line of calculus. Here a geometric proof is presented.
In this diagram, F is the focus of the parabola, and T and U lie on its directrix. P is an arbitrary point on the parabola. PT is perpendicular to the directrix, and the line MP bisects angle ∠FPT. Q is another point on the parabola, with QU perpendicular to the directrix. We know that FP = PT and FQ = QU. Clearly, QT > QU, so QT > FQ. All points on the bisector MP are equidistant from F and T, but Q is closer to F than to T. This means that Q is to the left of MP, that is, on the same side of it as the focus. The same would be true if Q were located anywhere else on the parabola (except at the point P), so the entire parabola, except the point P, is on the focus side of MP. Therefore, MP is the tangent to the parabola at P. Since it bisects the angle ∠FPT, this proves the tangent bisection property.
The logic of the last paragraph can be applied to modify the above proof of the reflective property. It effectively proves the line BE to be the tangent to the parabola at E if the angles α are equal. The reflective property follows as shown previously.
Pin and string construction
![image](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nbGlzaC5uaW5hLmF6L3dpa2lwZWRpYS9pbWFnZS9hSFIwY0hNNkx5OTFjR3h2WVdRdWQybHJhVzFsWkdsaExtOXlaeTkzYVd0cGNHVmthV0V2WTI5dGJXOXVjeTkwYUhWdFlpOWpMMk15TDFCaGNtRmliMnhoTFhCcGJpMXpkSEpwYm1jdWMzWm5Mekl5TUhCNExWQmhjbUZpYjJ4aExYQnBiaTF6ZEhKcGJtY3VjM1puTG5CdVp3PT0ucG5n.png)
The definition of a parabola by its focus and directrix can be used for drawing it with help of pins and strings:
- Choose the focus
and the directrix
of the parabola.
- Take a triangle of a set square and prepare a string with length
(see diagram).
- Pin one end of the string at point
of the triangle and the other one to the focus
.
- Position the triangle such that the second edge of the right angle is free to slide along the directrix.
- Take a pen and hold the string tight to the triangle.
- While moving the triangle along the directrix, the pen draws an arc of a parabola, because of
(see definition of a parabola).
Properties related to Pascal's theorem
A parabola can be considered as the affine part of a non-degenerated projective conic with a point on the line of infinity
, which is the tangent at
. The 5-, 4- and 3- point degenerations of Pascal's theorem are properties of a conic dealing with at least one tangent. If one considers this tangent as the line at infinity and its point of contact as the point at infinity of the y axis, one obtains three statements for a parabola.
The following properties of a parabola deal only with terms connect, intersect, parallel, which are invariants of similarities. So, it is sufficient to prove any property for the unit parabola with equation .
4-points property
![image](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nbGlzaC5uaW5hLmF6L3dpa2lwZWRpYS9pbWFnZS9hSFIwY0hNNkx5OTFjR3h2WVdRdWQybHJhVzFsWkdsaExtOXlaeTkzYVd0cGNHVmthV0V2WTI5dGJXOXVjeTkwYUhWdFlpOWxMMlUxTDFCaGNtRmlaV3d0Y0dzdGN5NXpkbWN2TWpJd2NIZ3RVR0Z5WVdKbGJDMXdheTF6TG5OMlp5NXdibWM9LnBuZw==.png)
Any parabola can be described in a suitable coordinate system by an equation .
Proof: straightforward calculation for the unit parabola .
Application: The 4-points property of a parabola can be used for the construction of point , while
and
are given.
Remark: the 4-points property of a parabola is an affine version of the 5-point degeneration of Pascal's theorem.
3-points–1-tangent property
![image](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nbGlzaC5uaW5hLmF6L3dpa2lwZWRpYS9pbWFnZS9hSFIwY0hNNkx5OTFjR3h2WVdRdWQybHJhVzFsWkdsaExtOXlaeTkzYVd0cGNHVmthV0V2WTI5dGJXOXVjeTkwYUhWdFlpOW1MMlk1TDFCaGNtRmlaV3d0ZEdzdGN5NXpkbWN2TWpJd2NIZ3RVR0Z5WVdKbGJDMTBheTF6TG5OMlp5NXdibWM9LnBuZw==.png)
Let be three points of the parabola with equation
and
the intersection of the secant line
with the line
and
the intersection of the secant line
with the line
(see picture). Then the tangent at point
is parallel to the line
. (The lines
and
are parallel to the axis of the parabola.)
Proof: can be performed for the unit parabola . A short calculation shows: line
has slope
which is the slope of the tangent at point
.
Application: The 3-points-1-tangent-property of a parabola can be used for the construction of the tangent at point , while
are given.
Remark: The 3-points-1-tangent-property of a parabola is an affine version of the 4-point-degeneration of Pascal's theorem.
2-points–2-tangents property
![image](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nbGlzaC5uaW5hLmF6L3dpa2lwZWRpYS9pbWFnZS9hSFIwY0hNNkx5OTFjR3h2WVdRdWQybHJhVzFsWkdsaExtOXlaeTkzYVd0cGNHVmthV0V2WTI5dGJXOXVjeTkwYUhWdFlpODRMemhsTDFCaGNtRmlaV3d0ZEdzdE1pMXpMbk4yWnk4eU1qQndlQzFRWVhKaFltVnNMWFJyTFRJdGN5NXpkbWN1Y0c1bi5wbmc=.png)
Let be two points of the parabola with equation
, and
the intersection of the tangent at point
with the line
, and
the intersection of the tangent at point
with the line
(see picture). Then the secant
is parallel to the line
. (The lines
and
are parallel to the axis of the parabola.)
Proof: straight forward calculation for the unit parabola .
Application: The 2-points–2-tangents property can be used for the construction of the tangent of a parabola at point , if
and the tangent at
are given.
Remark 1: The 2-points–2-tangents property of a parabola is an affine version of the 3-point degeneration of Pascal's theorem.
Remark 2: The 2-points–2-tangents property should not be confused with the following property of a parabola, which also deals with 2 points and 2 tangents, but is not related to Pascal's theorem.
Axis direction
![image](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nbGlzaC5uaW5hLmF6L3dpa2lwZWRpYS9pbWFnZS9hSFIwY0hNNkx5OTFjR3h2WVdRdWQybHJhVzFsWkdsaExtOXlaeTkzYVd0cGNHVmthV0V2WTI5dGJXOXVjeTkwYUhWdFlpODJMell5TDFCaGNtRmlaV3d0WVdzdGN5NXpkbWN2TWpJd2NIZ3RVR0Z5WVdKbGJDMWhheTF6TG5OMlp5NXdibWM9LnBuZw==.png)
The statements above presume the knowledge of the axis direction of the parabola, in order to construct the points . The following property determines the points
by two given points and their tangents only, and the result is that the line
is parallel to the axis of the parabola.
Let
be two points of the parabola
, and
be their tangents;
be the intersection of the tangents
,
be the intersection of the parallel line to
through
with the parallel line to
through
(see picture).
Then the line is parallel to the axis of the parabola and has the equation
Proof: can be done (like the properties above) for the unit parabola .
Application: This property can be used to determine the direction of the axis of a parabola, if two points and their tangents are given. An alternative way is to determine the midpoints of two parallel chords, see section on parallel chords.
Remark: This property is an affine version of the theorem of two perspective triangles of a non-degenerate conic.
Related: Chord has two additional properties:
- Its slope is the arithmetic average of the slopes of tangents
and
.
- It is parallel to the tangent at the intersection of
with the parabola.
Steiner generation
Parabola
![image](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nbGlzaC5uaW5hLmF6L3dpa2lwZWRpYS9pbWFnZS9hSFIwY0hNNkx5OTFjR3h2WVdRdWQybHJhVzFsWkdsaExtOXlaeTkzYVd0cGNHVmthV0V2WTI5dGJXOXVjeTkwYUhWdFlpOHhMekUyTDFCaGNtRmlaV3d0YzNSbGFXNWxjaTF6TG5OMlp5OHlNakJ3ZUMxUVlYSmhZbVZzTFhOMFpXbHVaWEl0Y3k1emRtY3VjRzVuLnBuZw==.png)
Steiner established the following procedure for the construction of a non-degenerate conic (see Steiner conic):
This procedure can be used for a simple construction of points on the parabola :
- Consider the pencil at the vertex
and the set of lines
that are parallel to the y axis.
- Let
be a point on the parabola, and
,
.
- The line segment
is divided into n equally spaced segments, and this division is projected (in the direction
) onto the line segment
(see figure). This projection gives rise to a projective mapping
from pencil
onto the pencil
.
- The intersection of the line
and the i-th parallel to the y axis is a point on the parabola.
- Let
Proof: straightforward calculation.
Remark: Steiner's generation is also available for ellipses and hyperbolas.
Dual parabola
![image](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nbGlzaC5uaW5hLmF6L3dpa2lwZWRpYS9pbWFnZS9hSFIwY0hNNkx5OTFjR3h2WVdRdWQybHJhVzFsWkdsaExtOXlaeTkzYVd0cGNHVmthV0V2WTI5dGJXOXVjeTkwYUhWdFlpODFMelU1TDFCaGNtRmlaV3d0WW1WNmFXVnlMbk4yWnk4ME1EQndlQzFRWVhKaFltVnNMV0psZW1sbGNpNXpkbWN1Y0c1bi5wbmc=.png)
A dual parabola consists of the set of tangents of an ordinary parabola.
The Steiner generation of a conic can be applied to the generation of a dual conic by changing the meanings of points and lines:
In order to generate elements of a dual parabola, one starts with
- three points
not on a line,
- divides the line sections
and
each into
equally spaced line segments and adds numbers as shown in the picture.
- Then the lines
are tangents of a parabola, hence elements of a dual parabola.
- The parabola is a Bézier curve of degree 2 with the control points
.
The proof is a consequence of the de Casteljau algorithm for a Bézier curve of degree 2.
Inscribed angles and the 3-point form
![image](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nbGlzaC5uaW5hLmF6L3dpa2lwZWRpYS9pbWFnZS9hSFIwY0hNNkx5OTFjR3h2WVdRdWQybHJhVzFsWkdsaExtOXlaeTkzYVd0cGNHVmthV0V2WTI5dGJXOXVjeTkwYUhWdFlpODRMemcwTDFCaGNtRmlaV3d0Y0hkekxYTXVjM1puTHpJeU1IQjRMVkJoY21GaVpXd3RjSGR6TFhNdWMzWm5MbkJ1Wnc9PS5wbmc=.png)
A parabola with equation is uniquely determined by three points
with different x coordinates. The usual procedure to determine the coefficients
is to insert the point coordinates into the equation. The result is a linear system of three equations, which can be solved by Gaussian elimination or Cramer's rule, for example. An alternative way uses the inscribed angle theorem for parabolas.
In the following, the angle of two lines will be measured by the difference of the slopes of the line with respect to the directrix of the parabola. That is, for a parabola of equation the angle between two lines of equations
is measured by
Analogous to the inscribed angle theorem for circles, one has the inscribed angle theorem for parabolas:
(Proof: straightforward calculation: If the points are on a parabola, one may translate the coordinates for having the equation , then one has
if the points are on the parabola.)
A consequence is that the equation (in ) of the parabola determined by 3 points
with different x coordinates is (if two x coordinates are equal, there is no parabola with directrix parallel to the x axis, which passes through the points)
Multiplying by the denominators that depend on
one obtains the more standard form
Pole–polar relation
![image](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nbGlzaC5uaW5hLmF6L3dpa2lwZWRpYS9pbWFnZS9hSFIwY0hNNkx5OTFjR3h2WVdRdWQybHJhVzFsWkdsaExtOXlaeTkzYVd0cGNHVmthV0V2WTI5dGJXOXVjeTkwYUhWdFlpODRMemhsTDFCaGNtRmlaV3d0Y0c5c0xYTXVjM1puTHpJeU1IQjRMVkJoY21GaVpXd3RjRzlzTFhNdWMzWm5MbkJ1Wnc9PS5wbmc=.png)
In a suitable coordinate system any parabola can be described by an equation . The equation of the tangent at a point
is
One obtains the function
on the set of points of the parabola onto the set of tangents.
Obviously, this function can be extended onto the set of all points of to a bijection between the points of
and the lines with equations
. The inverse mapping is
This relation is called the pole–polar relation of the parabola, where the point is the pole, and the corresponding line its polar.
By calculation, one checks the following properties of the pole–polar relation of the parabola:
- For a point (pole) on the parabola, the polar is the tangent at this point (see picture:
).
- For a pole
outside the parabola the intersection points of its polar with the parabola are the touching points of the two tangents passing
(see picture:
).
- For a point within the parabola the polar has no point with the parabola in common (see picture:
and
).
- The intersection point of two polar lines (for example,
) is the pole of the connecting line of their poles (in example:
).
- Focus and directrix of the parabola are a pole–polar pair.
Remark: Pole–polar relations also exist for ellipses and hyperbolas.
Tangent properties
Two tangent properties related to the latus rectum
Let the line of symmetry intersect the parabola at point Q, and denote the focus as point F and its distance from point Q as f. Let the perpendicular to the line of symmetry, through the focus, intersect the parabola at a point T. Then (1) the distance from F to T is 2f, and (2) a tangent to the parabola at point T intersects the line of symmetry at a 45° angle.: 26
![image](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nbGlzaC5uaW5hLmF6L3dpa2lwZWRpYS9pbWFnZS9hSFIwY0hNNkx5OTFjR3h2WVdRdWQybHJhVzFsWkdsaExtOXlaeTkzYVd0cGNHVmthV0V2WTI5dGJXOXVjeTkwYUhWdFlpODBMelJsTDFCaGNtRmlaV3d0YjNKMGFHOXdMbk4yWnk4eU1qQndlQzFRWVhKaFltVnNMVzl5ZEdodmNDNXpkbWN1Y0c1bi5wbmc=.png)
Orthoptic property
If two tangents to a parabola are perpendicular to each other, then they intersect on the directrix. Conversely, two tangents that intersect on the directrix are perpendicular. In other words, at any point on the directrix the whole parabola subtends a right angle.
Lambert's theorem
Let three tangents to a parabola form a triangle. Then Lambert's theorem states that the focus of the parabola lies on the circumcircle of the triangle.: Corollary 20
Tsukerman's converse to Lambert's theorem states that, given three lines that bound a triangle, if two of the lines are tangent to a parabola whose focus lies on the circumcircle of the triangle, then the third line is also tangent to the parabola.
Facts related to chords and arcs
Focal length calculated from parameters of a chord
Suppose a chord crosses a parabola perpendicular to its axis of symmetry. Let the length of the chord between the points where it intersects the parabola be c and the distance from the vertex of the parabola to the chord, measured along the axis of symmetry, be d. The focal length, f, of the parabola is given by
Suppose a system of Cartesian coordinates is used such that the vertex of the parabola is at the origin, and the axis of symmetry is the y axis. The parabola opens upward. It is shown elsewhere in this article that the equation of the parabola is 4fy = x2, where f is the focal length. At the positive x end of the chord, x = c/2 and y = d. Since this point is on the parabola, these coordinates must satisfy the equation above. Therefore, by substitution, . From this,
.
Area enclosed between a parabola and a chord
![image](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nbGlzaC5uaW5hLmF6L3dpa2lwZWRpYS9pbWFnZS9hSFIwY0hNNkx5OTFjR3h2WVdRdWQybHJhVzFsWkdsaExtOXlaeTkzYVd0cGNHVmthV0V2WTI5dGJXOXVjeTkwYUhWdFlpOHpMek14TDBGeVpXRmZZbVYwZDJWbGJsOWhYM0JoY21GaWIyeGhYMkZ1WkY5aFgyTm9iM0prTG5OMlp5OHlNakJ3ZUMxQmNtVmhYMkpsZEhkbFpXNWZZVjl3WVhKaFltOXNZVjloYm1SZllWOWphRzl5WkM1emRtY3VjRzVuLnBuZw==.png)
The area enclosed between a parabola and a chord (see diagram) is two-thirds of the area of a parallelogram that surrounds it. One side of the parallelogram is the chord, and the opposite side is a tangent to the parabola. The slope of the other parallel sides is irrelevant to the area. Often, as here, they are drawn parallel with the parabola's axis of symmetry, but this is arbitrary.
A theorem equivalent to this one, but different in details, was derived by Archimedes in the 3rd century BCE. He used the areas of triangles, rather than that of the parallelogram. See The Quadrature of the Parabola.
If the chord has length b and is perpendicular to the parabola's axis of symmetry, and if the perpendicular distance from the parabola's vertex to the chord is h, the parallelogram is a rectangle, with sides of b and h. The area A of the parabolic segment enclosed by the parabola and the chord is therefore
This formula can be compared with the area of a triangle: 1/2bh.
In general, the enclosed area can be calculated as follows. First, locate the point on the parabola where its slope equals that of the chord. This can be done with calculus, or by using a line that is parallel to the axis of symmetry of the parabola and passes through the midpoint of the chord. The required point is where this line intersects the parabola. Then, using the formula given in Distance from a point to a line, calculate the perpendicular distance from this point to the chord. Multiply this by the length of the chord to get the area of the parallelogram, then by 2/3 to get the required enclosed area.
Corollary concerning midpoints and endpoints of chords
![image](https://www.english.nina.az/wikipedia/image/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nbGlzaC5uaW5hLmF6L3dpa2lwZWRpYS9pbWFnZS9hSFIwY0hNNkx5OTFjR3h2WVdRdWQybHJhVzFsWkdsaExtOXlaeTkzYVd0cGNHVmthV0V2WTI5dGJXOXVjeTkwYUhWdFlpODFMelZrTDFCaGNtRmlaV3d0Y0hObGFHNWxiaTF6TG5OMlp5OHlNakJ3ZUMxUVlYSmhZbVZzTFhCelpXaHVaVzR0Y3k1emRtY3VjRzVuLnBuZw==.png)
A corollary of the above discussion is that if a parabola has several parallel chords, their midpoints all lie on a line parallel to the axis of symmetry. If tangents to the parabola are drawn through the endpoints of any of these chords, the two tangents intersect on this same line parallel to the axis of symmetry (see Axis-direction of a parabola).
Arc length
If a point X is located on a parabola with focal length f, and if p is the perpendicular distance from X to the axis of symmetry of the parabola, then the lengths of arcs of the parabola that terminate at X can be calculated from f and p as follows, assuming they are all expressed in the same units.
In mathematics a parabola is a plane curve which is mirror symmetrical and is approximately U shaped It fits several superficially different mathematical descriptions which can all be proved to define exactly the same curves Part of a parabola blue with various features other colours The complete parabola has no endpoints In this orientation it extends infinitely to the left right and upward The parabola is a member of the family of conic sections One description of a parabola involves a point the focus and a line the directrix The focus does not lie on the directrix The parabola is the locus of points in that plane that are equidistant from the directrix and the focus Another description of a parabola is as a conic section created from the intersection of a right circular conical surface and a plane parallel to another plane that is tangential to the conical surface The graph of a quadratic function y ax2 bx c displaystyle y ax 2 bx c with a 0 displaystyle a neq 0 is a parabola with its axis parallel to the y axis Conversely every such parabola is the graph of a quadratic function The line perpendicular to the directrix and passing through the focus that is the line that splits the parabola through the middle is called the axis of symmetry The point where the parabola intersects its axis of symmetry is called the vertex and is the point where the parabola is most sharply curved The distance between the vertex and the focus measured along the axis of symmetry is the focal length The latus rectum is the chord of the parabola that is parallel to the directrix and passes through the focus Parabolas can open up down left right or in some other arbitrary direction Any parabola can be repositioned and rescaled to fit exactly on any other parabola that is all parabolas are geometrically similar Parabolas have the property that if they are made of material that reflects light then light that travels parallel to the axis of symmetry of a parabola and strikes its concave side is reflected to its focus regardless of where on the parabola the reflection occurs Conversely light that originates from a point source at the focus is reflected into a parallel collimated beam leaving the parabola parallel to the axis of symmetry The same effects occur with sound and other waves This reflective property is the basis of many practical uses of parabolas The parabola has many important applications from a parabolic antenna or parabolic microphone to automobile headlight reflectors and the design of ballistic missiles It is frequently used in physics engineering and many other areas HistoryParabolic compass designed by Leonardo da Vinci The earliest known work on conic sections was by Menaechmus in the 4th century BC He discovered a way to solve the problem of doubling the cube using parabolas The solution however does not meet the requirements of compass and straightedge construction The area enclosed by a parabola and a line segment the so called parabola segment was computed by Archimedes by the method of exhaustion in the 3rd century BC in his The Quadrature of the Parabola The name parabola is due to Apollonius who discovered many properties of conic sections It means application referring to application of areas concept that has a connection with this curve as Apollonius had proved The focus directrix property of the parabola and other conic sections was mentioned in the works of Pappus Galileo showed that the path of a projectile follows a parabola a consequence of uniform acceleration due to gravity The idea that a parabolic reflector could produce an image was already well known before the invention of the reflecting telescope Designs were proposed in the early to mid 17th century by many mathematicians including Rene Descartes Marin Mersenne and James Gregory When Isaac Newton built the first reflecting telescope in 1668 he skipped using a parabolic mirror because of the difficulty of fabrication opting for a spherical mirror Parabolic mirrors are used in most modern reflecting telescopes and in satellite dishes and radar receivers Definition as a locus of pointsA parabola can be defined geometrically as a set of points locus of points in the Euclidean plane A parabola is a set of points such that for any point P displaystyle P of the set the distance PF displaystyle PF to a fixed point F displaystyle F the focus is equal to the distance Pl displaystyle Pl to a fixed line l displaystyle l the directrix P PF Pl displaystyle P PF Pl The midpoint V displaystyle V of the perpendicular from the focus F displaystyle F onto the directrix l displaystyle l is called the vertex and the line FV displaystyle FV is the axis of symmetry of the parabola In a Cartesian coordinate systemAxis of symmetry parallel to the y axis Parabola with axis parallel to y axis p is the semi latus rectum If one introduces Cartesian coordinates such that F 0 f f gt 0 displaystyle F 0 f f gt 0 and the directrix has the equation y f displaystyle y f one obtains for a point P x y displaystyle P x y from PF 2 Pl 2 displaystyle PF 2 Pl 2 the equation x2 y f 2 y f 2 displaystyle x 2 y f 2 y f 2 Solving for y displaystyle y yields y 14fx2 displaystyle y frac 1 4f x 2 This parabola is U shaped opening to the top The horizontal chord through the focus see picture in opening section is called the latus rectum one half of it is the semi latus rectum The latus rectum is parallel to the directrix The semi latus rectum is designated by the letter p displaystyle p From the picture one obtains p 2f displaystyle p 2f The latus rectum is defined similarly for the other two conics the ellipse and the hyperbola The latus rectum is the line drawn through a focus of a conic section parallel to the directrix and terminated both ways by the curve For any case p displaystyle p is the radius of the osculating circle at the vertex For a parabola the semi latus rectum p displaystyle p is the distance of the focus from the directrix Using the parameter p displaystyle p the equation of the parabola can be rewritten as x2 2py displaystyle x 2 2py More generally if the vertex is V v1 v2 displaystyle V v 1 v 2 the focus F v1 v2 f displaystyle F v 1 v 2 f and the directrix y v2 f displaystyle y v 2 f one obtains the equation y 14f x v1 2 v2 14fx2 v12fx v124f v2 displaystyle y frac 1 4f x v 1 2 v 2 frac 1 4f x 2 frac v 1 2f x frac v 1 2 4f v 2 Remarks In the case of f lt 0 displaystyle f lt 0 the parabola has a downward opening The presumption that the axis is parallel to the y axis allows one to consider a parabola as the graph of a polynomial of degree 2 and conversely the graph of an arbitrary polynomial of degree 2 is a parabola see next section If one exchanges x displaystyle x and y displaystyle y one obtains equations of the form y2 2px displaystyle y 2 2px These parabolas open to the left if p lt 0 displaystyle p lt 0 or to the right if p gt 0 displaystyle p gt 0 General position Parabola general position If the focus is F f1 f2 displaystyle F f 1 f 2 and the directrix ax by c 0 displaystyle ax by c 0 then one obtains the equation ax by c 2a2 b2 x f1 2 y f2 2 displaystyle frac ax by c 2 a 2 b 2 x f 1 2 y f 2 2 the left side of the equation uses the Hesse normal form of a line to calculate the distance Pl displaystyle Pl For a parametric equation of a parabola in general position see As the affine image of the unit parabola The implicit equation of a parabola is defined by an irreducible polynomial of degree two ax2 bxy cy2 dx ey f 0 displaystyle ax 2 bxy cy 2 dx ey f 0 such that b2 4ac 0 displaystyle b 2 4ac 0 or equivalently such that ax2 bxy cy2 displaystyle ax 2 bxy cy 2 is the square of a linear polynomial As a graph of a functionParabolas y ax2 displaystyle y ax 2 The previous section shows that any parabola with the origin as vertex and the y axis as axis of symmetry can be considered as the graph of a function f x ax2 with a 0 displaystyle f x ax 2 text with a neq 0 For a gt 0 displaystyle a gt 0 the parabolas are opening to the top and for a lt 0 displaystyle a lt 0 are opening to the bottom see picture From the section above one obtains The focus is 0 14a displaystyle left 0 frac 1 4a right the focal length 14a displaystyle frac 1 4a the semi latus rectum is p 12a displaystyle p frac 1 2a the vertex is 0 0 displaystyle 0 0 the directrix has the equation y 14a displaystyle y frac 1 4a the tangent at point x0 ax02 displaystyle x 0 ax 0 2 has the equation y 2ax0x ax02 displaystyle y 2ax 0 x ax 0 2 For a 1 displaystyle a 1 the parabola is the unit parabola with equation y x2 displaystyle y x 2 Its focus is 0 14 displaystyle left 0 tfrac 1 4 right the semi latus rectum p 12 displaystyle p tfrac 1 2 and the directrix has the equation y 14 displaystyle y tfrac 1 4 The general function of degree 2 is f x ax2 bx c with a b c R a 0 displaystyle f x ax 2 bx c text with a b c in mathbb R a neq 0 Completing the square yields f x a x b2a 2 4ac b24a displaystyle f x a left x frac b 2a right 2 frac 4ac b 2 4a which is the equation of a parabola with the axis x b2a displaystyle x frac b 2a parallel to the y axis the focal length 14a displaystyle frac 1 4a the semi latus rectum p 12a displaystyle p frac 1 2a the vertex V b2a 4ac b24a displaystyle V left frac b 2a frac 4ac b 2 4a right the focus F b2a 4ac b2 14a displaystyle F left frac b 2a frac 4ac b 2 1 4a right the directrix y 4ac b2 14a displaystyle y frac 4ac b 2 1 4a the point of the parabola intersecting the y axis has coordinates 0 c displaystyle 0 c the tangent at a point on the y axis has the equation y bx c displaystyle y bx c Similarity to the unit parabolaWhen the parabola y 2x2 displaystyle color blue y 2x 2 is uniformly scaled by factor 2 the result is the parabola y x2 displaystyle color red y x 2 Two objects in the Euclidean plane are similar if one can be transformed to the other by a similarity that is an arbitrary composition of rigid motions translations and rotations and uniform scalings A parabola P displaystyle mathcal P with vertex V v1 v2 displaystyle V v 1 v 2 can be transformed by the translation x y x v1 y v2 displaystyle x y to x v 1 y v 2 to one with the origin as vertex A suitable rotation around the origin can then transform the parabola to one that has the y axis as axis of symmetry Hence the parabola P displaystyle mathcal P can be transformed by a rigid motion to a parabola with an equation y ax2 a 0 displaystyle y ax 2 a neq 0 Such a parabola can then be transformed by the uniform scaling x y ax ay displaystyle x y to ax ay into the unit parabola with equation y x2 displaystyle y x 2 Thus any parabola can be mapped to the unit parabola by a similarity A synthetic approach using similar triangles can also be used to establish this result The general result is that two conic sections necessarily of the same type are similar if and only if they have the same eccentricity Therefore only circles all having eccentricity 0 share this property with parabolas all having eccentricity 1 while general ellipses and hyperbolas do not There are other simple affine transformations that map the parabola y ax2 displaystyle y ax 2 onto the unit parabola such as x y x ya displaystyle x y to left x tfrac y a right But this mapping is not a similarity and only shows that all parabolas are affinely equivalent see As the affine image of the unit parabola As a special conic sectionPencil of conics with a common vertex The pencil of conic sections with the x axis as axis of symmetry one vertex at the origin 0 0 and the same semi latus rectum p displaystyle p can be represented by the equation y2 2px e2 1 x2 e 0 displaystyle y 2 2px e 2 1 x 2 quad e geq 0 with e displaystyle e the eccentricity For e 0 displaystyle e 0 the conic is a circle osculating circle of the pencil for 0 lt e lt 1 displaystyle 0 lt e lt 1 an ellipse for e 1 displaystyle e 1 the parabola with equation y2 2px displaystyle y 2 2px for e gt 1 displaystyle e gt 1 a hyperbola see picture In polar coordinatesPencil of conics with a common focus If p gt 0 the parabola with equation y2 2px displaystyle y 2 2px opening to the right has the polar representation r 2pcos fsin2 f f p2 p2 0 displaystyle r 2p frac cos varphi sin 2 varphi quad varphi in left tfrac pi 2 tfrac pi 2 right setminus 0 where r2 x2 y2 x rcos f displaystyle r 2 x 2 y 2 x r cos varphi Its vertex is V 0 0 displaystyle V 0 0 and its focus is F p2 0 displaystyle F left tfrac p 2 0 right If one shifts the origin into the focus that is F 0 0 displaystyle F 0 0 one obtains the equation r p1 cos f f 2pk displaystyle r frac p 1 cos varphi quad varphi neq 2 pi k Remark 1 Inverting this polar form shows that a parabola is the inverse of a cardioid Remark 2 The second polar form is a special case of a pencil of conics with focus F 0 0 displaystyle F 0 0 see picture r p1 ecos f displaystyle r frac p 1 e cos varphi e displaystyle e is the eccentricity Conic section and quadratic formDiagram description and definitions Cone with cross sections The diagram represents a cone with its axis AV The point A is its apex An inclined cross section of the cone shown in pink is inclined from the axis by the same angle 8 as the side of the cone According to the definition of a parabola as a conic section the boundary of this pink cross section EPD is a parabola A cross section perpendicular to the axis of the cone passes through the vertex P of the parabola This cross section is circular but appears elliptical when viewed obliquely as is shown in the diagram Its centre is V and PK is a diameter We will call its radius r Another perpendicular to the axis circular cross section of the cone is farther from the apex A than the one just described It has a chord DE which joins the points where the parabola intersects the circle Another chord BC is the perpendicular bisector of DE and is consequently a diameter of the circle These two chords and the parabola s axis of symmetry PM all intersect at the point M All the labelled points except D and E are coplanar They are in the plane of symmetry of the whole figure This includes the point F which is not mentioned above It is defined and discussed below in Position of the focus Let us call the length of DM and of EM x and the length of PM y Derivation of quadratic equation The lengths of BM and CM are BM 2ycos 8 displaystyle overline mathrm BM 2y cos theta triangle BPM is isosceles because PM AC PMB ACB ABC displaystyle overline PM parallel overline AC implies angle PMB angle ACB angle ABC CM 2r displaystyle overline mathrm CM 2r PMCK is a parallelogram Using the intersecting chords theorem on the chords BC and DE we get BM CM DM EM displaystyle overline mathrm BM cdot overline mathrm CM overline mathrm DM cdot overline mathrm EM Substituting 4rycos 8 x2 displaystyle 4ry cos theta x 2 Rearranging y x24rcos 8 displaystyle y frac x 2 4r cos theta For any given cone and parabola r and 8 are constants but x and y are variables that depend on the arbitrary height at which the horizontal cross section BECD is made This last equation shows the relationship between these variables They can be interpreted as Cartesian coordinates of the points D and E in a system in the pink plane with P as its origin Since x is squared in the equation the fact that D and E are on opposite sides of the y axis is unimportant If the horizontal cross section moves up or down toward or away from the apex of the cone D and E move along the parabola always maintaining the relationship between x and y shown in the equation The parabolic curve is therefore the locus of points where the equation is satisfied which makes it a Cartesian graph of the quadratic function in the equation Focal length It is proved in a preceding section that if a parabola has its vertex at the origin and if it opens in the positive y direction then its equation is y x2 4f where f is its focal length Comparing this with the last equation above shows that the focal length of the parabola in the cone is r sin 8 Position of the focus In the diagram above the point V is the foot of the perpendicular from the vertex of the parabola to the axis of the cone The point F is the foot of the perpendicular from the point V to the plane of the parabola By symmetry F is on the axis of symmetry of the parabola Angle VPF is complementary to 8 and angle PVF is complementary to angle VPF therefore angle PVF is 8 Since the length of PV is r the distance of F from the vertex of the parabola is r sin 8 It is shown above that this distance equals the focal length of the parabola which is the distance from the vertex to the focus The focus and the point F are therefore equally distant from the vertex along the same line which implies that they are the same point Therefore the point F defined above is the focus of the parabola This discussion started from the definition of a parabola as a conic section but it has now led to a description as a graph of a quadratic function This shows that these two descriptions are equivalent They both define curves of exactly the same shape Alternative proof with Dandelin spheres Parabola red side projection view and top projection view of a cone with a Dandelin sphere An alternative proof can be done using Dandelin spheres It works without calculation and uses elementary geometric considerations only see the derivation below The intersection of an upright cone by a plane p displaystyle pi whose inclination from vertical is the same as a generatrix a k a generator line a line containing the apex and a point on the cone surface m0 displaystyle m 0 of the cone is a parabola red curve in the diagram This generatrix m0 displaystyle m 0 is the only generatrix of the cone that is parallel to plane p displaystyle pi Otherwise if there are two generatrices parallel to the intersecting plane the intersection curve will be a hyperbola or degenerate hyperbola if the two generatrices are in the intersecting plane If there is no generatrix parallel to the intersecting plane the intersection curve will be an ellipse or a circle or a point Let plane s displaystyle sigma be the plane that contains the vertical axis of the cone and line m0 displaystyle m 0 The inclination of plane p displaystyle pi from vertical is the same as line m0 displaystyle m 0 means that viewing from the side that is the plane p displaystyle pi is perpendicular to plane s displaystyle sigma m0 p displaystyle m 0 parallel pi In order to prove the directrix property of a parabola see Definition as a locus of points above one uses a Dandelin sphere d displaystyle d which is a sphere that touches the cone along a circle c displaystyle c and plane p displaystyle pi at point F displaystyle F The plane containing the circle c displaystyle c intersects with plane p displaystyle pi at line l displaystyle l There is a mirror symmetry in the system consisting of plane p displaystyle pi Dandelin sphere d displaystyle d and the cone the plane of symmetry is s displaystyle sigma Since the plane containing the circle c displaystyle c is perpendicular to plane s displaystyle sigma and p s displaystyle pi perp sigma their intersection line l displaystyle l must also be perpendicular to plane s displaystyle sigma Since line m0 displaystyle m 0 is in plane s displaystyle sigma l m0 displaystyle l perp m 0 It turns out that F displaystyle F is the focus of the parabola and l displaystyle l is the directrix of the parabola Let P displaystyle P be an arbitrary point of the intersection curve The generatrix of the cone containing P displaystyle P intersects circle c displaystyle c at point A displaystyle A The line segments PF displaystyle overline PF and PA displaystyle overline PA are tangential to the sphere d displaystyle d and hence are of equal length Generatrix m0 displaystyle m 0 intersects the circle c displaystyle c at point D displaystyle D The line segments ZD displaystyle overline ZD and ZA displaystyle overline ZA are tangential to the sphere d displaystyle d and hence are of equal length Let line q displaystyle q be the line parallel to m0 displaystyle m 0 and passing through point P displaystyle P Since m0 p displaystyle m 0 parallel pi and point P displaystyle P is in plane p displaystyle pi line q displaystyle q must be in plane p displaystyle pi Since m0 l displaystyle m 0 perp l we know that q l displaystyle q perp l as well Let point B displaystyle B be the foot of the perpendicular from point P displaystyle P to line l displaystyle l that is PB displaystyle overline PB is a segment of line q displaystyle q and hence PB ZD displaystyle overline PB parallel overline ZD From intercept theorem and ZD ZA displaystyle overline ZD overline ZA we know that PA PB displaystyle overline PA overline PB Since PA PF displaystyle overline PA overline PF we know that PF PB displaystyle overline PF overline PB which means that the distance from P displaystyle P to the focus F displaystyle F is equal to the distance from P displaystyle P to the directrix l displaystyle l Proof of the reflective propertyReflective property of a parabola The reflective property states that if a parabola can reflect light then light that enters it travelling parallel to the axis of symmetry is reflected toward the focus This is derived from geometrical optics based on the assumption that light travels in rays Consider the parabola y x2 Since all parabolas are similar this simple case represents all others Construction and definitions The point E is an arbitrary point on the parabola The focus is F the vertex is A the origin and the line FA is the axis of symmetry The line EC is parallel to the axis of symmetry intersects the x axis at D and intersects the directrix at C The point B is the midpoint of the line segment FC Deductions The vertex A is equidistant from the focus F and from the directrix Since C is on the directrix the y coordinates of F and C are equal in absolute value and opposite in sign B is the midpoint of FC Its x coordinate is half that of D that is x 2 The slope of the line BE is the quotient of the lengths of ED and BD which is x2 x 2 2x But 2x is also the slope first derivative of the parabola at E Therefore the line BE is the tangent to the parabola at E The distances EF and EC are equal because E is on the parabola F is the focus and C is on the directrix Therefore since B is the midpoint of FC triangles FEB and CEB are congruent three sides which implies that the angles marked a are congruent The angle above E is vertically opposite angle BEC This means that a ray of light that enters the parabola and arrives at E travelling parallel to the axis of symmetry will be reflected by the line BE so it travels along the line EF as shown in red in the diagram assuming that the lines can somehow reflect light Since BE is the tangent to the parabola at E the same reflection will be done by an infinitesimal arc of the parabola at E Therefore light that enters the parabola and arrives at E travelling parallel to the axis of symmetry of the parabola is reflected by the parabola toward its focus This conclusion about reflected light applies to all points on the parabola as is shown on the left side of the diagram This is the reflective property Other consequences There are other theorems that can be deduced simply from the above argument Tangent bisection property The above proof and the accompanying diagram show that the tangent BE bisects the angle FEC In other words the tangent to the parabola at any point bisects the angle between the lines joining the point to the focus and perpendicularly to the directrix Intersection of a tangent and perpendicular from focus Perpendicular from focus to tangent Since triangles FBE and CBE are congruent FB is perpendicular to the tangent BE Since B is on the x axis which is the tangent to the parabola at its vertex it follows that the point of intersection between any tangent to a parabola and the perpendicular from the focus to that tangent lies on the line that is tangential to the parabola at its vertex See animated diagram and pedal curve Reflection of light striking the convex side If light travels along the line CE it moves parallel to the axis of symmetry and strikes the convex side of the parabola at E It is clear from the above diagram that this light will be reflected directly away from the focus along an extension of the segment FE Alternative proofs Parabola and tangent The above proofs of the reflective and tangent bisection properties use a line of calculus Here a geometric proof is presented In this diagram F is the focus of the parabola and T and U lie on its directrix P is an arbitrary point on the parabola PT is perpendicular to the directrix and the line MP bisects angle FPT Q is another point on the parabola with QU perpendicular to the directrix We know that FP PT and FQ QU Clearly QT gt QU so QT gt FQ All points on the bisector MP are equidistant from F and T but Q is closer to F than to T This means that Q is to the left of MP that is on the same side of it as the focus The same would be true if Q were located anywhere else on the parabola except at the point P so the entire parabola except the point P is on the focus side of MP Therefore MP is the tangent to the parabola at P Since it bisects the angle FPT this proves the tangent bisection property The logic of the last paragraph can be applied to modify the above proof of the reflective property It effectively proves the line BE to be the tangent to the parabola at E if the angles a are equal The reflective property follows as shown previously Pin and string constructionParabola pin string construction The definition of a parabola by its focus and directrix can be used for drawing it with help of pins and strings Choose the focus F displaystyle F and the directrix l displaystyle l of the parabola Take a triangle of a set square and prepare a string with length AB displaystyle AB see diagram Pin one end of the string at point A displaystyle A of the triangle and the other one to the focus F displaystyle F Position the triangle such that the second edge of the right angle is free to slide along the directrix Take a pen and hold the string tight to the triangle While moving the triangle along the directrix the pen draws an arc of a parabola because of PF PB displaystyle PF PB see definition of a parabola Properties related to Pascal s theoremA parabola can be considered as the affine part of a non degenerated projective conic with a point Y displaystyle Y infty on the line of infinity g displaystyle g infty which is the tangent at Y displaystyle Y infty The 5 4 and 3 point degenerations of Pascal s theorem are properties of a conic dealing with at least one tangent If one considers this tangent as the line at infinity and its point of contact as the point at infinity of the y axis one obtains three statements for a parabola The following properties of a parabola deal only with terms connect intersect parallel which are invariants of similarities So it is sufficient to prove any property for the unit parabola with equation y x2 displaystyle y x 2 4 points property 4 points property of a parabola Any parabola can be described in a suitable coordinate system by an equation y ax2 displaystyle y ax 2 Let P1 x1 y1 P2 x2 y2 P3 x3 y3 P4 x4 y4 displaystyle P 1 x 1 y 1 P 2 x 2 y 2 P 3 x 3 y 3 P 4 x 4 y 4 be four points of the parabola y ax2 displaystyle y ax 2 and Q2 displaystyle Q 2 the intersection of the secant line P1P4 displaystyle P 1 P 4 with the line x x2 displaystyle x x 2 and let Q1 displaystyle Q 1 be the intersection of the secant line P2P3 displaystyle P 2 P 3 with the line x x1 displaystyle x x 1 see picture Then the secant line P3P4 displaystyle P 3 P 4 is parallel to line Q1Q2 displaystyle Q 1 Q 2 The lines x x1 displaystyle x x 1 and x x2 displaystyle x x 2 are parallel to the axis of the parabola Proof straightforward calculation for the unit parabola y x2 displaystyle y x 2 Application The 4 points property of a parabola can be used for the construction of point P4 displaystyle P 4 while P1 P2 P3 displaystyle P 1 P 2 P 3 and Q2 displaystyle Q 2 are given Remark the 4 points property of a parabola is an affine version of the 5 point degeneration of Pascal s theorem 3 points 1 tangent property 3 points 1 tangent property Let P0 x0 y0 P1 x1 y1 P2 x2 y2 displaystyle P 0 x 0 y 0 P 1 x 1 y 1 P 2 x 2 y 2 be three points of the parabola with equation y ax2 displaystyle y ax 2 and Q2 displaystyle Q 2 the intersection of the secant line P0P1 displaystyle P 0 P 1 with the line x x2 displaystyle x x 2 and Q1 displaystyle Q 1 the intersection of the secant line P0P2 displaystyle P 0 P 2 with the line x x1 displaystyle x x 1 see picture Then the tangent at point P0 displaystyle P 0 is parallel to the line Q1Q2 displaystyle Q 1 Q 2 The lines x x1 displaystyle x x 1 and x x2 displaystyle x x 2 are parallel to the axis of the parabola Proof can be performed for the unit parabola y x2 displaystyle y x 2 A short calculation shows line Q1Q2 displaystyle Q 1 Q 2 has slope 2x0 displaystyle 2x 0 which is the slope of the tangent at point P0 displaystyle P 0 Application The 3 points 1 tangent property of a parabola can be used for the construction of the tangent at point P0 displaystyle P 0 while P1 P2 P0 displaystyle P 1 P 2 P 0 are given Remark The 3 points 1 tangent property of a parabola is an affine version of the 4 point degeneration of Pascal s theorem 2 points 2 tangents property 2 points 2 tangents property Let P1 x1 y1 P2 x2 y2 displaystyle P 1 x 1 y 1 P 2 x 2 y 2 be two points of the parabola with equation y ax2 displaystyle y ax 2 and Q2 displaystyle Q 2 the intersection of the tangent at point P1 displaystyle P 1 with the line x x2 displaystyle x x 2 and Q1 displaystyle Q 1 the intersection of the tangent at point P2 displaystyle P 2 with the line x x1 displaystyle x x 1 see picture Then the secant P1P2 displaystyle P 1 P 2 is parallel to the line Q1Q2 displaystyle Q 1 Q 2 The lines x x1 displaystyle x x 1 and x x2 displaystyle x x 2 are parallel to the axis of the parabola Proof straight forward calculation for the unit parabola y x2 displaystyle y x 2 Application The 2 points 2 tangents property can be used for the construction of the tangent of a parabola at point P2 displaystyle P 2 if P1 P2 displaystyle P 1 P 2 and the tangent at P1 displaystyle P 1 are given Remark 1 The 2 points 2 tangents property of a parabola is an affine version of the 3 point degeneration of Pascal s theorem Remark 2 The 2 points 2 tangents property should not be confused with the following property of a parabola which also deals with 2 points and 2 tangents but is not related to Pascal s theorem Axis direction Construction of the axis direction The statements above presume the knowledge of the axis direction of the parabola in order to construct the points Q1 Q2 displaystyle Q 1 Q 2 The following property determines the points Q1 Q2 displaystyle Q 1 Q 2 by two given points and their tangents only and the result is that the line Q1Q2 displaystyle Q 1 Q 2 is parallel to the axis of the parabola Let P1 x1 y1 P2 x2 y2 displaystyle P 1 x 1 y 1 P 2 x 2 y 2 be two points of the parabola y ax2 displaystyle y ax 2 and t1 t2 displaystyle t 1 t 2 be their tangents Q1 displaystyle Q 1 be the intersection of the tangents t1 t2 displaystyle t 1 t 2 Q2 displaystyle Q 2 be the intersection of the parallel line to t1 displaystyle t 1 through P2 displaystyle P 2 with the parallel line to t2 displaystyle t 2 through P1 displaystyle P 1 see picture Then the line Q1Q2 displaystyle Q 1 Q 2 is parallel to the axis of the parabola and has the equation x x1 x2 2 displaystyle x x 1 x 2 2 Proof can be done like the properties above for the unit parabola y x2 displaystyle y x 2 Application This property can be used to determine the direction of the axis of a parabola if two points and their tangents are given An alternative way is to determine the midpoints of two parallel chords see section on parallel chords Remark This property is an affine version of the theorem of two perspective triangles of a non degenerate conic Related Chord P1P2 displaystyle P 1 P 2 has two additional properties Its slope is the arithmetic average of the slopes of tangents t1 displaystyle t 1 and t2 displaystyle t 2 It is parallel to the tangent at the intersection of Q1Q2 displaystyle Q 1 Q 2 with the parabola Steiner generationParabola Steiner generation of a parabola Steiner established the following procedure for the construction of a non degenerate conic see Steiner conic Given two pencils B U B V displaystyle B U B V of lines at two points U V displaystyle U V all lines containing U displaystyle U and V displaystyle V respectively and a projective but not perspective mapping p displaystyle pi of B U displaystyle B U onto B V displaystyle B V the intersection points of corresponding lines form a non degenerate projective conic section This procedure can be used for a simple construction of points on the parabola y ax2 displaystyle y ax 2 Consider the pencil at the vertex S 0 0 displaystyle S 0 0 and the set of lines Py displaystyle Pi y that are parallel to the y axis Let P x0 y0 displaystyle P x 0 y 0 be a point on the parabola and A 0 y0 displaystyle A 0 y 0 B x0 0 displaystyle B x 0 0 The line segment BP displaystyle overline BP is divided into n equally spaced segments and this division is projected in the direction BA displaystyle BA onto the line segment AP displaystyle overline AP see figure This projection gives rise to a projective mapping p displaystyle pi from pencil S displaystyle S onto the pencil Py displaystyle Pi y The intersection of the line SBi displaystyle SB i and the i th parallel to the y axis is a point on the parabola Proof straightforward calculation Remark Steiner s generation is also available for ellipses and hyperbolas Dual parabola Dual parabola and Bezier curve of degree 2 right curve point and division points Q0 Q1 displaystyle Q 0 Q 1 for parameter t 0 4 displaystyle t 0 4 A dual parabola consists of the set of tangents of an ordinary parabola The Steiner generation of a conic can be applied to the generation of a dual conic by changing the meanings of points and lines Let be given two point sets on two lines u v displaystyle u v and a projective but not perspective mapping p displaystyle pi between these point sets then the connecting lines of corresponding points form a non degenerate dual conic In order to generate elements of a dual parabola one starts with three points P0 P1 P2 displaystyle P 0 P 1 P 2 not on a line divides the line sections P0P1 displaystyle overline P 0 P 1 and P1P2 displaystyle overline P 1 P 2 each into n displaystyle n equally spaced line segments and adds numbers as shown in the picture Then the lines P0P1 P1P2 1 1 2 2 displaystyle P 0 P 1 P 1 P 2 1 1 2 2 dotsc are tangents of a parabola hence elements of a dual parabola The parabola is a Bezier curve of degree 2 with the control points P0 P1 P2 displaystyle P 0 P 1 P 2 The proof is a consequence of the de Casteljau algorithm for a Bezier curve of degree 2 Inscribed angles and the 3 point formInscribed angles of a parabola A parabola with equation y ax2 bx c a 0 displaystyle y ax 2 bx c a neq 0 is uniquely determined by three points x1 y1 x2 y2 x3 y3 displaystyle x 1 y 1 x 2 y 2 x 3 y 3 with different x coordinates The usual procedure to determine the coefficients a b c displaystyle a b c is to insert the point coordinates into the equation The result is a linear system of three equations which can be solved by Gaussian elimination or Cramer s rule for example An alternative way uses the inscribed angle theorem for parabolas In the following the angle of two lines will be measured by the difference of the slopes of the line with respect to the directrix of the parabola That is for a parabola of equation y ax2 bx c displaystyle y ax 2 bx c the angle between two lines of equations y m1x d1 y m2x d2 displaystyle y m 1 x d 1 y m 2 x d 2 is measured by m1 m2 displaystyle m 1 m 2 Analogous to the inscribed angle theorem for circles one has the inscribed angle theorem for parabolas Four points Pi xi yi i 1 4 displaystyle P i x i y i i 1 ldots 4 with different x coordinates see picture are on a parabola with equation y ax2 bx c displaystyle y ax 2 bx c if and only if the angles at P3 displaystyle P 3 and P4 displaystyle P 4 have the same measure as defined above That is y4 y1x4 x1 y4 y2x4 x2 y3 y1x3 x1 y3 y2x3 x2 displaystyle frac y 4 y 1 x 4 x 1 frac y 4 y 2 x 4 x 2 frac y 3 y 1 x 3 x 1 frac y 3 y 2 x 3 x 2 Proof straightforward calculation If the points are on a parabola one may translate the coordinates for having the equation y ax2 displaystyle y ax 2 then one has yi yjxi xj xi xj displaystyle frac y i y j x i x j x i x j if the points are on the parabola A consequence is that the equation in x y displaystyle color green x color red y of the parabola determined by 3 points Pi xi yi i 1 2 3 displaystyle P i x i y i i 1 2 3 with different x coordinates is if two x coordinates are equal there is no parabola with directrix parallel to the x axis which passes through the points y y1x x1 y y2x x2 y3 y1x3 x1 y3 y2x3 x2 displaystyle frac color red y y 1 color green x x 1 frac color red y y 2 color green x x 2 frac y 3 y 1 x 3 x 1 frac y 3 y 2 x 3 x 2 Multiplying by the denominators that depend on x displaystyle color green x one obtains the more standard form x1 x2 y x x1 x x2 y3 y1x3 x1 y3 y2x3 x2 y1 y2 x x1y2 x2y1 displaystyle x 1 x 2 color red y color green x x 1 color green x x 2 left frac y 3 y 1 x 3 x 1 frac y 3 y 2 x 3 x 2 right y 1 y 2 color green x x 1 y 2 x 2 y 1 Pole polar relationParabola pole polar relation In a suitable coordinate system any parabola can be described by an equation y ax2 displaystyle y ax 2 The equation of the tangent at a point P0 x0 y0 y0 ax02 displaystyle P 0 x 0 y 0 y 0 ax 0 2 is y 2ax0 x x0 y0 2ax0x ax02 2ax0x y0 displaystyle y 2ax 0 x x 0 y 0 2ax 0 x ax 0 2 2ax 0 x y 0 One obtains the function x0 y0 y 2ax0x y0 displaystyle x 0 y 0 to y 2ax 0 x y 0 on the set of points of the parabola onto the set of tangents Obviously this function can be extended onto the set of all points of R2 displaystyle mathbb R 2 to a bijection between the points of R2 displaystyle mathbb R 2 and the lines with equations y mx d m d R displaystyle y mx d m d in mathbb R The inverse mapping is line y mx d point m2a d displaystyle text line y mx d rightarrow text point tfrac m 2a d This relation is called the pole polar relation of the parabola where the point is the pole and the corresponding line its polar By calculation one checks the following properties of the pole polar relation of the parabola For a point pole on the parabola the polar is the tangent at this point see picture P1 p1 displaystyle P 1 p 1 For a pole P displaystyle P outside the parabola the intersection points of its polar with the parabola are the touching points of the two tangents passing P displaystyle P see picture P2 p2 displaystyle P 2 p 2 For a point within the parabola the polar has no point with the parabola in common see picture P3 p3 displaystyle P 3 p 3 and P4 p4 displaystyle P 4 p 4 The intersection point of two polar lines for example p3 p4 displaystyle p 3 p 4 is the pole of the connecting line of their poles in example P3 P4 displaystyle P 3 P 4 Focus and directrix of the parabola are a pole polar pair Remark Pole polar relations also exist for ellipses and hyperbolas Tangent propertiesTwo tangent properties related to the latus rectum Let the line of symmetry intersect the parabola at point Q and denote the focus as point F and its distance from point Q as f Let the perpendicular to the line of symmetry through the focus intersect the parabola at a point T Then 1 the distance from F to T is 2f and 2 a tangent to the parabola at point T intersects the line of symmetry at a 45 angle 26 Perpendicular tangents intersect on the directrixOrthoptic property If two tangents to a parabola are perpendicular to each other then they intersect on the directrix Conversely two tangents that intersect on the directrix are perpendicular In other words at any point on the directrix the whole parabola subtends a right angle Lambert s theorem Let three tangents to a parabola form a triangle Then Lambert s theorem states that the focus of the parabola lies on the circumcircle of the triangle Corollary 20 Tsukerman s converse to Lambert s theorem states that given three lines that bound a triangle if two of the lines are tangent to a parabola whose focus lies on the circumcircle of the triangle then the third line is also tangent to the parabola Facts related to chords and arcsFocal length calculated from parameters of a chord Suppose a chord crosses a parabola perpendicular to its axis of symmetry Let the length of the chord between the points where it intersects the parabola be c and the distance from the vertex of the parabola to the chord measured along the axis of symmetry be d The focal length f of the parabola is given by f c216d displaystyle f frac c 2 16d Proof Suppose a system of Cartesian coordinates is used such that the vertex of the parabola is at the origin and the axis of symmetry is the y axis The parabola opens upward It is shown elsewhere in this article that the equation of the parabola is 4fy x2 where f is the focal length At the positive x end of the chord x c 2 and y d Since this point is on the parabola these coordinates must satisfy the equation above Therefore by substitution 4fd c2 2 displaystyle 4fd left tfrac c 2 right 2 From this f c216d displaystyle f tfrac c 2 16d Area enclosed between a parabola and a chord Parabola magenta and line lower light blue including a chord blue The area enclosed between them is in pink The chord itself ends at the points where the line intersects the parabola The area enclosed between a parabola and a chord see diagram is two thirds of the area of a parallelogram that surrounds it One side of the parallelogram is the chord and the opposite side is a tangent to the parabola The slope of the other parallel sides is irrelevant to the area Often as here they are drawn parallel with the parabola s axis of symmetry but this is arbitrary A theorem equivalent to this one but different in details was derived by Archimedes in the 3rd century BCE He used the areas of triangles rather than that of the parallelogram See The Quadrature of the Parabola If the chord has length b and is perpendicular to the parabola s axis of symmetry and if the perpendicular distance from the parabola s vertex to the chord is h the parallelogram is a rectangle with sides of b and h The area A of the parabolic segment enclosed by the parabola and the chord is therefore A 23bh displaystyle A frac 2 3 bh This formula can be compared with the area of a triangle 1 2 bh In general the enclosed area can be calculated as follows First locate the point on the parabola where its slope equals that of the chord This can be done with calculus or by using a line that is parallel to the axis of symmetry of the parabola and passes through the midpoint of the chord The required point is where this line intersects the parabola Then using the formula given in Distance from a point to a line calculate the perpendicular distance from this point to the chord Multiply this by the length of the chord to get the area of the parallelogram then by 2 3 to get the required enclosed area Corollary concerning midpoints and endpoints of chords Midpoints of parallel chords A corollary of the above discussion is that if a parabola has several parallel chords their midpoints all lie on a line parallel to the axis of symmetry If tangents to the parabola are drawn through the endpoints of any of these chords the two tangents intersect on this same line parallel to the axis of symmetry see Axis direction of a parabola Arc length If a point X is located on a parabola with focal length f and if p is the perpendicular distance from X to the axis of symmetry of the parabola then the lengths of arcs of the parabola that terminate at X can be calculated from f and p as follows assuming they are all expressed in the same units h p2 q f2 h2 s hqf fln h qf gt