
The Mongolic peoples are a collection of East Asian-originated ethnic groups in East, North, South Asia and Eastern Europe, who speak Mongolic languages. Their ancestors are referred to as Proto-Mongols. The largest contemporary Mongolic ethnic group is the Mongols. Mongolic-speaking people, although distributed in a wide geographical area, show a high genetic affinity to each other, and display continuity with ancient Northeast Asians.


List of ethnic groups
Contemporary ethnic groups
Ethnonym | Population | Primarily regions | Religion |
---|---|---|---|
Mongols | 10,000,000 | Mongolia, Inner Mongolia (China), other Mongolian autonomous divisions of China | Tibetan Buddhism, Tengrism (Mongolian shamanism) |
Hazaras | c. 7,000,000 | Hazarajat (Afghanistan), Pakistan, Iran | Shia Islam, Sunni Islam |
Aimaqs | c. 1,600,000 | Afghanistan | Sunni Islam |
Dongxiangs | 621,000 | Dongxiang Autonomous County, Jishishan Bonan, Dongxiang and Salar Autonomous County | Sunni Islam |
Buryats | 556,000 | Buryatia, Agin-Buryat Okrug, Ust-Orda Buryat Okrug (Russia) | Tibetan Buddhism, Orthodox Christianity, Tengrism (Mongolian shamanism) |
Monguor | 290,000 | Qinghai, Gansu (China) | Tibetan Buddhism, Tengrism |
Kalmyks | c. 200,000 | Kalmykia (Russia) | Tibetan Buddhism |
Daurs | 132,000 | Morin Dawa Daur Autonomous Banner, Meilisi Daur District | Tibetan Buddhism, Tengrism (shamanism) |
Khatso | c. 60,000 | Tonghai County | Tibetan Buddhism |
Sogwo Arig | c. 40,000 | Qinghai (China) | Tibetan Buddhism, Bon |
Sichuan Mongols | 29,000 | Muli Tibetan Autonomous County, Yanyuan County | Tibetan Buddhism |
Bonan | 20,000 | Jishishan Bonan, Dongxiang and Salar Autonomous County | Sunni Islam, Tibetan Buddhism |
Hamnigans | c. 10,000 | Zabaykalsky Krai (Russia), Northeastern Mongolia, Hulunbuir (China) | Tibetan Buddhism, shamanism |
Yugurs | 6,000 | Sunan Yugur Autonomous County | Tibetan Buddhism, Tengrism |
Moghols | 2,000 | Herat Province (Afghanistan) | Sunni Islam |
Kangjia | 2,000 | Huangnan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture | Sunni Islam |
Mughals | ? | North India, Pakistan | Sunni Islam |
Gurans | ? | Zabaykalsky Krai, Buryatia | Orthodox Christianity, Buddhism |
In addition, Mongolized Soyots live in Buryatia. Their population is 3600 people. Soyots are one of the indigenous minority peoples of Russia. They are descendants of Turkified Samoyeds. At the same time, a number of orientalists (Zhukovskaia, Nanzatov, Baldaev and others) consider modern Soyots as a sub-ethnos within the Buryat people: "... here the ethnic composition of the population was formed, which remains relatively stable to this day - Bulagats, Khongodors, Soyots, who (some earlier, others later) became subethnic groups of the Buryats."
Ethnic groups of Mongolian origin
A large Mongolian component took [citation needed] in the ethnic formation of the Hazaras. The high frequency[citation needed] of haplogroup C2-M217 is consistent[citation needed] with the purported Mongolian origin of many of the Hazaras. Modern Hazaras speak Hazaragi, one of the dialects of the Dari/Persian language. Same happened to the Aimaq people whom purported their descendancy through Borjigin and Barlas clans.
The Mughals, descendants of the Barlas[citation needed] and other Mongol tribes[citation needed], currently speak Indo-Aryan languages of their respective regions, including Urdu and Punjabi. Although they acknowledge their Mongolic roots, their ethnic identity has shifted to their local South Asian ethnic group.
Historical ethnic groups
- Donghu
- Xianbei — founders, in the 1st century CE, of the first Mongolic empire, namely Xianbei state
- Wuhuan
- Rouran
- Yujiulü
- Duan
- Qara'unas
- Yuwen
- Kumo Xi
- Murong
- Tuyuhun
- Tuoba
- Qifu
- Tufa
- Shiwei
- Didouyu
- Khitan
- Yelü
- Zubu
General characteristics
Languages
Languages of the Mongolic peoples belong to the Mongolic language family. The Mongolic languages are a language family spoken in Eastern Europe (Kalmykia), Central Asia, North Asia and East Asia. The best-known member of this language family, Mongolian, is the primary language of most of the residents of Mongolia and the Mongol residents of Inner Mongolia and Buryatia, with an estimated 5.7+ million speakers.
The Mongolic ethnicities possibly related to the Turkic and Tungusic peoples, whose languages together would include in the hypothetical Altaic language family.
Religions
The Mongolic peoples are predominantly followers of Tibetan Buddhism. In 1576 the Gelug Tibetan school which was founded by the half-Mongol Je Tsongkhapa became the state religion of Mongolia. Some groups such as Dongxiangs and Bonan people adopted Sunni Islam, as did Moghols in Afghanistan and Mughals in India. Among a part of the population, the ethnic religion, namely Tengrism (Mongolian shamanism) is preserved. A small number of Christians emerged under the influence of the Russian Church and Western missionaries.
Mongolian shamanism, more broadly called the Mongolian folk religion, or occasionally Tengerism[according to whom?], as refers to the animistic and shamanic indigenous religion that has been practiced in Mongolia and its surrounding areas (including Buryatia and Inner Mongolia), as well as among Daur and other peoples, at least since the age of recorded history. In the earliest known stages, it was intricately tied to all other aspects of social life and to the tribal organization of Mongolian society. Along the way, it has become influenced by and mingled with Buddhism. Tengrism was transformed into a monotheistic religion only at the imperial level within aristocratic circles.
Culture
The Culture of Mongolia has been heavily influenced by the Mongol nomadic way of life and shows similarities to other East Asian and Central Asian cultures. The various Mongolic ethnic groups share a highly similar culture and traditions, but have specific differences in clothing styles and cuisine. Although Mongolian traditional clothing (deel) has changed little since the days of the empire, there have been some changes in styles which distinguish modern Mongolian dress from historic costume. Each tribe or clan has its own deel design distinguished by cut, color, and trimming. Mongolian cuisine is primarily based on meat and dairy, with some regional variations. The most important public festivals are the Naadam. A Naadam involves horse racing, wrestling, and archery competitions. For families, the most important festival is Tsagaan Sar (Lunar New Year), which is roughly equivalent to the Chinese New Year and usually falls into January or February. Mongolia has a very old musical tradition. Key traditional elements are throat-singing, the Morin Khuur (horse head fiddle) and other string instruments, and several types of songs. Mongolian melodies are typically characterized by pentatonic harmonies and long end notes.
Origin
The ethnogenesis of Mongolic peoples is largely linked with the expansion of Ancient Northeast Asians. They subsequently came into contact with other groups, notably Sinitic peoples to their South and Western Steppe Herders to their far West. The Mongolians pastoralist lifestyle, may in part be derived from the Western Steppe Herders, but without much geneflow between these two groups, suggesting cultural transmission.
Genetics
Mongols and other Mongolic-speaking groups, show high genetic affinity to each other, followed by genetic proximity to Central and East/Southeast Asian peoples. The analysis of 175 Mongolic samples, representing 6 ethnic groups, incorporating results of the 1000 Genomes Project panel, revealed genetic homogeneity between different Mongolic groups, and that Northeast, East, and Southeast Asian populations are closer to each other than to other Eurasian populations.
Maternal lineages
Mongolic peoples maternal lineages are primarily shared with East Asians (54%) and Southeast Asians (28%), while around 14% are shared with Europeans and other West Eurasian populations. The remaining 4% are distributed throughout Eurasia and not associated with a specific group.
A study based on mtDNA noted that ancient populations in Mongolia had a mixed West and East Eurasian origin, while modern Mongolians are characterized by substantially less West Eurasian maternal ancestry. It is suggested that many West Eurasian mtDNA haplogroups in modern Mongolians are believed to have arrived around 2,500-5,000 years ago, or the Mongolian Bronze Age. A smaller number arrived in the early Iron Age. Research by Rogers, et al. provides evidence that some West Eurasian maternal lineages had made it to Mongolia east of the Altai mountains prior to the Bronze Age. During the medieval period, a continuous increase in East Asian mitochondrial lineages was detected, which these authors attribute to Genghis Khan's Pax Mongolica.
Paternal lineages
An analysis of the paternal genetic diversity of Mongolians (n=95 from Ulaangom, n=100 from Dalandzadgad, n=97 from Ulaanbaatar, n=84 from Undurkhaan, n=117 from Choibalsan) performed by Toshimichi Yamamoto et alii at the Department of Legal Medicine and Bioethics, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Japan revealed a mean frequency of 59.0% Haplogroup C-M217 (49.5% Ulaanbaatar, 57.1% Undurkhaan, 59.0% Choibalsan, 61.0% Dalandzadgad, 68.4% Ulaangom), 13.9% Haplogroup O-M175 (4.2% Ulaangom, 11.0% Dalandzadgad, 13.1% Undurkhaan, 15.4% Choibalsan, 25.8% Ulaanbaatar), 11.3% Haplogroup N-M231 (8.2% Ulaanbaatar, 8.4% Ulaangom, 10.3% Choibalsan, 14.0% Dalandzadgad, 15.5% Undurkhaan), 6.2% Haplogroup R (3.1% Ulaanbaatar, 3.4% Choibalsan, 3.6% Undurkhaan, 7.0% Dalandzadgad, 13.7% Ulaangom), 3.5% Haplogroup D-M174 (1.1% Ulaangom, 3.4% Choibalsan, 4.0% Dalandzadgad, 4.1% Ulaanbaatar, 4.8% Undurkhaan), and 2.8% Haplogroup Q1b (2.0% Dalandzadgad, 2.4% Undurkhaan, 3.1% Ulaanbaatar, 3.2% Ulaangom, 3.4% Choibalsan). The authors noted that "at least 4 major male ancestors with Y-hg-C3 have affected the gene pool of Mongolian males at the different periods," producing star-like clusters of Y-STR haplotypes. Most numerous on average are the members of C3*: 11.6% Ulaangom, 14.4% Ulaanbaatar, 28.6% Undurkhaan, 29.9% Choibalsan, 48.0% Dalandzadgad. Second most numerous on average are the members of Haplogroup C3c: 2.0% Dalandzadgad, 16.7% Undurkhaan, 17.1% Choibalsan, 23.7% Ulaanbaatar, 53.7% Ulaangom. Third most numerous on average are the members of Haplogroup C3d i.e. C-M407: 3.2% Ulaangom, 8.0% Dalandzadgad, 8.5% Choibalsan, 10.7% Undurkhaan, 11.3% Ulaanbaatar.
A study based on ancient DNA and Y-DNA found that ancient populations in the region of modern-day Mongolia had a mixed West and East Eurasian origin during the Xiongnu period. Male-mediated Western Steppe Herders ancestry increased by the establishment of Türkic and Uyghur rule in Mongolia, which was accompanied by an increase in the West Eurasian haplogroups R and J. There was a male-mediated rise in East Asian ancestry in the late medieval Mongolian period, paralleling the increase of haplogroup C2b.
Autosomal DNA
Genetic studies on Mongolic populations found them to be "well-fitted by a three-way admixture" of Ancient Northeast Asian-like (ANA) ancestry, with variable amounts of Yellow River Farmer-like, and Western Steppe Herders ancestries. Mongols of Inner Mongolia were found to display genetic continuity with "Late Medieval Mongol" samples, and can be modeled as 46% Ancient Northeast Asian, 44% Yellow River Farmer, and 10% West Eurasian (Andronovo-like).Mongol Empire period samples carried between 55–64% Ancient Northeast Asian ancestry, 21–27% Yellow River Farmer-like sources, and 15–18% Western Steppe Herder (Sarmatian or Alan-like) sources.
One autosomal study on Oirat-speaking Kalmyks living in Kalmykia, Eastern Europe, found them to be derived from a Western Mongolian source population. Despite their long-distance migration, Kalmyks still display a predominant East Asian genetic profile. Kalmyks derive around 80% East Asian ancestry and 20% Western Eurasian ancestry.
Two autosomal genetic studies on Inner Mongolians found that they are best modeled as a mixture of Ancient Northeast Asian-like (ANA) and 10% to 25% East Asian Yellow River Farmer ancestry sources (increasing among Khorchins to around 62%), with only minor Western Eurasian genetic contributions (5.6–11.6%).
Mongolic peoples display genetic continuity to the Devil’s Gate Cave specimen (7,000 BCE) and the Amur13K specimen (13,000 BCE). The Neolithic Northeast Asian ancestry, is shared with other "putative Altaic-speaking peoples" specifically Turkic, and Tungusic-speaking peoples, together with shared "IBD fragments" in haplotype variation, supporting a Northeast Asian origin of these three groups. Turkic and Western Mongolic populations display the relatively highest amounts of West Eurasian admixture, inline with historical contacts between Ancient Northeast Asians and West Eurasian populations of the Eurasian Steppes, and evidence from linguistic borrowings. In comparison, Eastern, Central and Southern Mongolic peoples as well as Tungusic peoples had considerable less West Eurasian ancestry but higher Yellow River farmers ancestry. Sinitic peoples largely lacked any West Eurasian-derived ancestry and displayed primarily affinity with historical Yellow River farmers.
Notes
- Some Mongolic ethnic groups are variously described as subgroups of Mongols or as separate ethnic groups; for example, the Buryats and the Kalmyks are recognized as distinct ethnolinguistic groups in Russia (see 2010 Census and other).
- "The gene flow from Western Eurasian was preliminarily detected in Mongol population of TreeMix-based phylogenetic tree; the ancestral source was finally identified in qpAdm, ranging from 5.6 to 11.6% in those Mongolian subgroups; ALDER and GLOBETROTTER supported that the west-east admixture event was recently estimated in the period ranging from Tang Dynasty to Yuan Dynasty. ... We further performed haplotype-based GLOBETROTTER to obtain a high-resolution characterization of the admixture landscaped of three Mongolian subgroups. All targets showed robust signals of west-east admixture (Supplementary Table S11)."
References
Citations
- Ochir 2008; Zhukovskaia 2007, p. 354; Nimaev 2011.
- Bai; et al. 2018.
- Wang; et al. 2021.
- Natalia Zhukovskaia (2005)."Бурятские шаманки на международной конференции (тункинский опыт, июль 2004 г.) // Женщина и возрождение шаманизма.". Москва: Российская академия наук. Институт этнологии и антропологии имени Н. Н. Миклухо-Маклая. Page 129. In Russian: "... здесь сформировался тот этнический состав населения, который относительно стабильно сохраняется до сегодняшнего дня - булагаты, хонгодоры, сойоты, которые (одни раньше, другие позже) вошли как субэтносы в состав бурят."
- Nanzatov, B. Z. (2003). "Племенной состав бурят в XIX веке." [Buryat tribe composition in the 19th century]. Народы и культуры Сибири. Взаимодействие как фактор формирования и модернизации (in Russian). Irkutsk. pp. 15–27.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Балдаев С. П. (1970). Родословные легенды и предания бурят. Ч. 1 (in Russian). Улан-Удэ. p. 166.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Bacon 1951.
- Жабагин М. К. (2017). Анализ связи полиморфизма Y-хромосомы и родоплеменной структуры в казахской популяции. Moscow. p. 71. In Russian: "...за счет высокой частоты гаплогруппы С2-М217, что согласуется с монгольским происхождением хазарейцев."
- Winston, Robert, ed. (2004). Human: The Definitive Visual Guide. New York: Dorling Kindersley. p. 432. ISBN 0-7566-0520-2.
- Janata, A. "AYMĀQ". In Ehsan Yarshater (ed.). Encyclopædia Iranica (Online ed.). United States: Columbia University.
The Timuri, once the most powerful of the "lesser" Aymaq, had their original homeland in western Badghis. Besides those still living there or in Khorasan, there are settled Timuri south of Herat and near Shindand, as well as to the north of Ghazni in Shiite Hazara country. A group of Pashtunized nomadic Timuri has its winter quarters near Baghlan in northeastern Afghanistan. Some of the best qualities of "Herat Baluch" carpets are woven by Timuri in Badghis, classified by the name of the respective ṭaefa such as Kawdanī, Šērḵānī, Yaʿqūbḵānī, or Zakanī.
- Сабитов Ж. М., Баймуханов Н. Б. (2015). "Y-STR гаплотипы узбеков, уйгуров, таджиков, пуштунов, хазарейцев, моголов из базы данных Family Tree DNA". The Russian Journal of Genetic Genealogy (in Russian) (2): 22–23.
- Janhunen 2003.
- Svantesson et al. 2005.
- Pettazzoni 1956.
- Starostin, George (2016-04-05). "Altaic Languages". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.35. ISBN 978-0-19-938465-5.
- Heissig 1980.
- Pettazzoni 1956; Humphrey & Onon 1996; Shimamura 2004, pp. 649–51; Schlehe 2004, pp. 283–96; Balogh 2010, pp. 229–38; Bumochir 2014, pp. 473–91; Quijada, Graber & Stephen 2015, pp. 258–72.
- Bira 2011, p. 14.
- "Population dynamics and the rise of empires in Inner Asia: Genome-wide analysis spanning 6,000 years in the eastern Eurasian Steppe gives insights to the formation of Mongolia's empires". ScienceDaily. Retrieved 2023-06-04.
- Yang, Xiaomin; Sarengaowa; He, Guanglin; Guo, Jianxin; Zhu, Kongyang; Ma, Hao; Zhao, Jing; Yang, Meiqing; Chen, Jing; Zhang, Xianpeng; Tao, Le; Liu, Yilan; Zhang, Xiu-Fang; Wang, Chuan-Chao (2021). "Genomic Insights Into the Genetic Structure and Natural Selection of Mongolians". Frontiers in Genetics. 12: 735786. doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.735786. ISSN 1664-8021. PMC 8693022. PMID 34956310.
- Cheng, Baoweng; Tang, Wenru; He, Li; Dong, Yongli; Lu, Jing; Lei, Yunping; Yu, Haijing; Zhang, Jiali; Xiao, Chunjie (October 2008). "Genetic imprint of the Mongol: signal from phylogeographic analysis of mitochondrial DNA". Journal of Human Genetics. 53 (10): 905–913. doi:10.1007/s10038-008-0325-8. ISSN 1435-232X. PMID 18769869. S2CID 6841794.
- Cardinali; et al. 2022"Finally, a very few haplogroups originated in more recent times (<3 kya) and could be linked to historical events." [...] "A post-glacial expansion in eastern Asia was already proved for another mtDNA post-glacial marker, haplogroup U5b (Achilli et al., 2005). A later expansion can be probably connected to the climatic amelioration of the early Holocene that was accompanied by the development of farming and pastoralism and more sedentary communities. A mixed ancestry between Yamnaya and European farmers was recently identified by analyzing ancient Bronze Age Mongolians (Jeong et al., 2020; Wang C. C. et al., 2021). [...] The lack of Mongolia-specific sub-branches might also suggest that the WEu lineages arrived in the Eastern Steppe in more recent times. Certainly, the ages of some WEu lineages between 5 and 3 kya could be linked to Bronze Age migrations across the Eurasian steppes that probably involved also the Afanasievo first (ca. 3300–2500 BCE) and later the Sintashta culture (ca. 2100–1800 BCE). Finally, by searching the available database of ancient mitogenomes for WEu lineages identified in our modern Mongolians, we identified 13 different sub-lineages among remains excavated in Mongolia and dated after the Bronze Age. They might testify for small population movements from the west less than 3,000 ya that can be probably related to commercial routes. Actually, the migration path from western Eurasia to Mongolia marked by some of these mitochondrial sub-lineages (H5a1, J1b2, T2g, U2e1b, U4b1a1a1, and U4b1a4) occurred about 2,500 ya, thus temporally and geographically overlapping with the Silk Route, while other sub-haplogroups, such as J1b1b1 and U2e1a1, seem to have arrived in Mongolia later."
- Rogers, Leland L.; Honeychurch, William; Amartuvshin, Chunag; Kaestle, Frederika A. (2020). "U5A1 Mitochondrial DNA Haplotype Identified in Eneolithic Skeleton from Shatar Chuluu, Mongolia". Human Biology. 91 (4): 213–223. doi:10.1353/hub.2017.0079. ISSN 1534-6617. PMID 32767893.
- Rogers, Leland Liu; Kaestle, Frederika Ann (April 2022). "Analysis of mitochondrial DNA haplogroup frequencies in the population of the slab burial mortuary culture of Mongolia (ca. 1100–300 BCE )". American Journal of Biological Anthropology. 177 (4): 644–657. doi:10.1002/ajpa.24478. S2CID 246508594. The K hg may represent an ancient addition from early western foragers that had intermixed with early agriculturalists (Spengler, 2015), similar with the probable origins of the C hg found in the ancient Ukraine (Nikitin et al., 2012). The J1c8a haplotype might be from a regional polymorphism that is linked to migrating populations after the expansion of agriculturalism from the Middle East, perhaps associated with the development of caprine pastoralism that reached southeast Kazakhstan by at least 2800 BCE (Hermes et al 2020)."
- Cardinali; et al. 2022"Finally, rather than finding long-distance traces of the Mongol Empire expansion to the west, we identified continuous and recent (female-mediated) connections with neighboring Eastern Asian populations. The geographically restricted sharing of haplotypes from typical EAs mtDNA lineages might represent an outcome of Genghis Khan’s so-called Pax Mongolica still detectable in present-day Mongolians."
- Yamamoto, Toshimichi; Senda, Tomoki; Horiba, Daiki; Sakuma, Masayoshi; Kawaguchi, Yuuka; Kano, Yuuichi (2013-01-01). "Y-chromosome lineage in five regional Mongolian populations". Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series. Progress in Forensic Genetics 15. 4 (1): e260 – e261. doi:10.1016/j.fsigss.2013.10.133. ISSN 1875-1768.
- Jeong et al. 2020.
- Jeong et al. 2020: See Figure S2. "We also observed that this East Asian-related ancestry was brought into the Late Medieval populations more by male than female ancestors. ... Overall, Mongol period individuals characterized by a remarkable decrease in Western Eurasian ancestry compared to the preceding 1,600 years. They are best modeled as a mixture of ANA-like and East Asian-like ancestry sources, with only minor Western genetic ancestry. In addition, nearly a third of historic Mongol males (12/38) have Y haplogroup C2b, which is also widespread among modern Mongolians (Figure S3; Table S6); C2b is the presumed patrilineage of Genghis Khan (Zerjal et al., 2003)."
- Li, Hui; Cho, Kelly; Kidd, J.; Kidd, K. (2009). "Genetic landscape of Eurasia and "admixture" in Uyghurs". American Journal of Human Genetics. 85 (6): 934–937. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.10.024. PMC 2790568. PMID 20004770. S2CID 37591388.
- He, Guang-Lin; Wang, Meng-Ge; Zou, Xing; Yeh, Hui-Yuan; Liu, Chang-Hui; Liu, Chao; Chen, Gang; Wang, Chuan-Chao (2022-01-09). "Extensive ethnolinguistic diversity at the crossroads of North China and South Siberia reflects multiple sources of genetic diversity". Journal of Systematics and Evolution. 61 (1): 230–250. doi:10.1111/jse.12827. ISSN 1674-4918.
Here, we found that western Mongolians shared a similar ancestry history with late Medieval Mongols, which was descended 0.440 ancestry from YRB farmers, 0.4592 from ARB Hunter-Gatherers, and 0.1008 from western Eurasian Andronovo (Fig. 7G∼H). We also confirmed that early Medieval Turkic derived 68% ancestry from Neolithic Amur people. Ancient Turkic people also contributed 30% of genetic materials to western Mongolians whose remaining ancestry derived from eastern Mongolian-related ancient sources (Fig. 7I).
- Jeong, Choongwon; Wang, Ke; Wilkin, Shevan; Taylor, William Timothy Treal; Miller, Bryan K.; Bemmann, Jan H.; Stahl, Raphaela; Chiovelli, Chelsea; Knolle, Florian; Ulziibayar, Sodnom; Khatanbaatar, Dorjpurev; Erdenebaatar, Diimaajav; Erdenebat, Ulambayar; Ochir, Ayudai; Ankhsanaa, Ganbold (2020-11-12). "A Dynamic 6,000-Year Genetic History of Eurasia's Eastern Steppe". Cell. 183 (4): 890–904.e29. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.015. ISSN 0092-8674. PMC 7664836. PMID 33157037.
Mongol-era individuals as a group can be modeled with only 15%–18% Western Steppe ancestry (Alan or Sarmatian) but require 55%–64% Ulaanzuukh_SlabGrave and 21%–27% of Han-related ancestry (Table S5I). _ Since the fall of the Mongol empire in 1368 CE, the genetic profile of the Mongolian populations has not substantially changed.
- Balinova, Natalia; Hudjašov, Georgi; Pankratov, Vasili; Pennarun, Erwan; Reidla, Maere; Metspalu, Ene; Batyrov, Valery; Khomyakova, Irina; Reisberg, Tuuli; Parik, Jüri; Dzhaubermezov, Murat; Aiyzhy, Elena; Balinova, Altana; El’chinova, Galina; Spitsyna, Nailya (2024-04-11). "Gene pool preservation across time and space In Mongolian-speaking Oirats". European Journal of Human Genetics. 32 (9): 1150–1158. doi:10.1038/s41431-024-01588-w. ISSN 1476-5438. PMC 11369229. PMID 38605123.
- Yang; et al. 2021.
- Changmai, Piya; Pinhasi, Ron; Pietrusewsky, Michael; Stark, Miriam T.; Ikehara-Quebral, Rona Michi; Reich, David; Flegontov, Pavel (2022-12-29). "Ancient DNA from Protohistoric Period Cambodia indicates that South Asians admixed with local populations as early as 1st–3rd centuries CE". Scientific Reports. 12 (1): 22507. Bibcode:2022NatSR..1222507C. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-26799-3. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 9800559. PMID 36581666.
- He, Guang-Lin; Wang, Meng-Ge; Zou, Xing; Yeh, Hui-Yuan; Liu, Chang-Hui; Liu, Chao; Chen, Gang; Wang, Chuan-Chao (January 2023). "Extensive ethnolinguistic diversity at the crossroads of North China and South Siberia reflects multiple sources of genetic diversity". Journal of Systematics and Evolution. 61 (1): 230–250. doi:10.1111/jse.12827. ISSN 1674-4918. S2CID 245849003.
- Sikora, Martin; Pitulko, Vladimir V.; Sousa, Vitor C.; Allentoft, Morten E.; Vinner, Lasse; Rasmussen, Simon; Margaryan, Ashot; de Barros Damgaard, Peter; de la Fuente, Constanza; Renaud, Gabriel; Yang, Melinda A.; Fu, Qiaomei; Dupanloup, Isabelle; Giampoudakis, Konstantinos; Nogués-Bravo, David (2019). "The population history of northeastern Siberia since the Pleistocene". Nature. 570 (7760): 182–188. Bibcode:2019Natur.570..182S. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1279-z. hdl:1887/3198847. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 31168093. S2CID 174809069.
Most modern Siberian speakers of Neosiberian languages genetically fall on an East- West cline between Europeans and Early East Asians. Taking Even speakers as representatives, the Neosiberian turnover from the south, which largely replaced Ancient Paleosiberian ancestry, can be associated with the northward spread of Tungusic and probably also Turkic and Mongolic. However, the expansions of Tungusic as well as Turkic and Mongolic are too recent to be associable with the earliest waves of Neosiberian ancestry, dated later than ~11 kya, but discernible in the Baikal region from at least 6 kya onwards. Therefore, this phase of the Neosiberian population turnover must initially have transmitted other languages or language families into Siberia, including possibly Uralic and Yukaghir.
Sources
General
- Nimaev, Daba (2011). Монгольские народы: Этническая история и современные этнокультурные процессы [The Mongolic Peoples: Ethnic History and Contemporary Ethnocultural Processes] (in Russian). Lambert Academic Publishing. ISBN 978-3843324403.
- Ochir, Taĭzhiud Ai︠u︡udaĭn (2008). Sh. Choĭmaa (ed.). Монголчуудын гарал, нэршил [On the origin of Mongolian family: clan names and ethnonyms] (in Mongolian). Ulaanbaatar: International Institute for the Study of Nomadic Civilizations. ISBN 9789992959978. OCLC 505674246.
- Zhukovskaia, Natalia L. (2007) [1998]. "Монгольские народы" [Mongolic peoples]. In L.M. Mints (ed.). Народы мира: Энциклопедия [Peoples of the World: an Encyclopedia] (in Russian). Moscow: OLMA Media Group. pp. 354–356. ISBN 978-5-373-01057-3.
Genetic researches
- Bai, Haihua; Guo, Xiaosen; Zhang, Dong; Narisu, Narisu; Bu, Junjie; Jirimutu, Jirimutu; Liang, Fan; Zhao, Xiang; Xing, Yanping; Wang, Dingzhu; Li, Tongda (2014-12-01). "The Genome of a Mongolian Individual Reveals the Genetic Imprints of Mongolians on Modern Human Populations". Genome Biology and Evolution. 6 (12): 3122–3136. doi:10.1093/gbe/evu242. ISSN 1759-6653. PMC 4540083. PMID 25377941.
- Bai, Haihua; Guo, Xiaosen; Narisu, Narisu; Lan, Tianming; Wu, Qizhu; Xing, Yanping; Zhang, Yong; Bond, Stephen R.; Pei, Zhili; Zhang, Yanru; Zhang, Dandan (December 2018). "Whole-genome sequencing of 175 Mongolians uncovers population-specific genetic architecture and gene flow throughout North and East Asia". Nature Genetics. 50 (12): 1696–1704. doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0250-5. ISSN 1546-1718. PMID 30397334. S2CID 53222895.
- Cardinali, Irene; Bodner, Martin; Capodiferro, Marco Rosario; Amory, Christina; Rambaldi Migliore, Nicola; Gomez, Edgar J.; Myagmar, Erdene; Dashzeveg, Tumen; Carano, Francesco; Woodward, Scott R.; Parson, Walther (2022). "Mitochondrial DNA Footprints from Western Eurasia in Modern Mongolia". Frontiers in Genetics. 12: 819337. doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.819337. ISSN 1664-8021. PMC 8773455. PMID 35069708.
- Wang, Mengge; He, Guanglin; Gao, Shuang; Jia, Fuquan; Zou, Xing; Liu, Jing; Wang, Shouyu; Ye, Ziwei; Hou, Yiping; Wang, Zheng (2021-07-01). "Molecular genetic survey and forensic characterization of Chinese Mongolians via the 47 autosomal insertion/deletion marker". Genomics. 113 (4): 2199–2210. doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.05.010. ISSN 0888-7543. PMID 34022340. S2CID 235126419.
- Yang, Xiaomin; Sarengaowa; He, Guanglin; Guo, Jianxin; Zhu, Kongyang; Ma, Hao; Zhao, Jing; Yang, Meiqing; Chen, Jing; Zhang, Xianpeng; Tao, Le (2021). "Genomic Insights Into the Genetic Structure and Natural Selection of Mongolians". Frontiers in Genetics. 12: 735–786. doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.735786. ISSN 1664-8021. PMC 8693022. PMID 34956310.
Linguistics
- Janhunen, Juha, ed. (2003). The Mongolic languages. Routledge Language Family Series. London; New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-7007-1133-8.
- Svantesson, Jan-Olof; Tsendina, Anna; Karlsson, Anastasia; Franzén, Vivan (2005). The Phonology of Mongolian. New York: Oxford University Press.
Religious studies
- Balogh, Matyas (2010). "Contemporary shamanisms in Mongolia". Asian Ethnicity. 11 (2): 229–38. doi:10.1080/14631361003779489. S2CID 145595446.
- Bira, Shagdaryn (2011). Монголын тэнгэрийн үзэл: түүвэр зохиол, баримт бичгүүд [Mongolian Tengerism: selected papers and documents] (in Mongolian). Ulaanbaatar: Sodpress. ISBN 9789992955932.
- Bumochir, D. (2014). "Institutionalization of Mongolian shamanism: from primitivism to civilization". Asian Ethnicity. 15 (4): 473–91. doi:10.1080/14631369.2014.939331. S2CID 145329835.
- Heissig, Walther (1980) [1970]. The religions of Mongolia. Translated by G. Samuel. London; Henley: Routledge; Kegan Paul. ISBN 0-7103-0685-7.
- Humphrey, Caroline; Onon, Urgunge (1996). Shamans and Elders: Experience, Knowledge, and Power among the Daur Mongols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Pettazzoni, Raffaele (1956) [1955]. "Turco-Mongols and Related Peoples". The All-Knowing God. Researches into Early Religion and Culture. Translated by H. J. Rose. London.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Quijada, Jastine B.; Graber, Kathryn E.; Stephen, Eric (2015). "Finding "Their Own": Revitalizing Buryat Culture Through Shamanic Practices in Ulan-Ude". Problems of Post-Communism. 62 (5): 258–72. doi:10.1080/10758216.2015.1057040. S2CID 143106014.
- Schlehe, Judith (2004). "Shamanism in Mongolia and in New Age Movements". In Rasuly-Paleczek, Gabriele (ed.). Central Asia on Display: Proceedings of the VIIth Conference of the European Society for Central Asian Studies. Vol. 1. Vienna: LIT Verlag. pp. 283–96. ISBN 3-8258-8309-4.
- Shimamura, Ippei (2004). "Yellow Shamans (Mongolia)". In Walter, Mariko Namba; Neumann Fridman; Eva Jane (eds.). Shamanism: An Encyclopedia of World Beliefs, Practices, and Culture. Vol. 1. Santa Barbara, Ca: ABC-Clio. pp. 649–51. ISBN 9781576076453.
Ethnic groups
- Bacon, Elizabeth Emaline (1951). The Hazara Mongols of Afghanistan: A Study in Social Organization. Berkeley, Ca: University of California.
The Mongolic peoples are a collection of East Asian originated ethnic groups in East North South Asia and Eastern Europe who speak Mongolic languages Their ancestors are referred to as Proto Mongols The largest contemporary Mongolic ethnic group is the Mongols Mongolic speaking people although distributed in a wide geographical area show a high genetic affinity to each other and display continuity with ancient Northeast Asians Geographic distribution of the Mongolic languagesA map of the places that Mongolic peoples live The orange line shows the extent of the Mongol Empire in the late 13th century The red areas are the places dominated by the Mongolic groups Wikimedia Commons has media related to Mongolic peoples List of ethnic groupsContemporary ethnic groups Ethnonym Population Primarily regions ReligionMongols 10 000 000 Mongolia Inner Mongolia China other Mongolian autonomous divisions of China Tibetan Buddhism Tengrism Mongolian shamanism Hazaras c 7 000 000 Hazarajat Afghanistan Pakistan Iran Shia Islam Sunni IslamAimaqs c 1 600 000 Afghanistan Sunni IslamDongxiangs 621 000 Dongxiang Autonomous County Jishishan Bonan Dongxiang and Salar Autonomous County Sunni IslamBuryats 556 000 Buryatia Agin Buryat Okrug Ust Orda Buryat Okrug Russia Tibetan Buddhism Orthodox Christianity Tengrism Mongolian shamanism Monguor 290 000 Qinghai Gansu China Tibetan Buddhism TengrismKalmyks c 200 000 Kalmykia Russia Tibetan BuddhismDaurs 132 000 Morin Dawa Daur Autonomous Banner Meilisi Daur District Tibetan Buddhism Tengrism shamanism Khatso c 60 000 Tonghai County Tibetan BuddhismSogwo Arig c 40 000 Qinghai China Tibetan Buddhism BonSichuan Mongols 29 000 Muli Tibetan Autonomous County Yanyuan County Tibetan BuddhismBonan 20 000 Jishishan Bonan Dongxiang and Salar Autonomous County Sunni Islam Tibetan BuddhismHamnigans c 10 000 Zabaykalsky Krai Russia Northeastern Mongolia Hulunbuir China Tibetan Buddhism shamanismYugurs 6 000 Sunan Yugur Autonomous County Tibetan Buddhism TengrismMoghols 2 000 Herat Province Afghanistan Sunni IslamKangjia 2 000 Huangnan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture Sunni IslamMughals North India Pakistan Sunni IslamGurans Zabaykalsky Krai Buryatia Orthodox Christianity Buddhism In addition Mongolized Soyots live in Buryatia Their population is 3600 people Soyots are one of the indigenous minority peoples of Russia They are descendants of Turkified Samoyeds At the same time a number of orientalists Zhukovskaia Nanzatov Baldaev and others consider modern Soyots as a sub ethnos within the Buryat people here the ethnic composition of the population was formed which remains relatively stable to this day Bulagats Khongodors Soyots who some earlier others later became subethnic groups of the Buryats Ethnic groups of Mongolian origin A large Mongolian component took citation needed in the ethnic formation of the Hazaras The high frequency citation needed of haplogroup C2 M217 is consistent citation needed with the purported Mongolian origin of many of the Hazaras Modern Hazaras speak Hazaragi one of the dialects of the Dari Persian language Same happened to the Aimaq people whom purported their descendancy through Borjigin and Barlas clans The Mughals descendants of the Barlas citation needed and other Mongol tribes citation needed currently speak Indo Aryan languages of their respective regions including Urdu and Punjabi Although they acknowledge their Mongolic roots their ethnic identity has shifted to their local South Asian ethnic group Historical ethnic groups Donghu Xianbei founders in the 1st century CE of the first Mongolic empire namely Xianbei state Wuhuan Rouran Yujiulu Duan Qara unas Yuwen Kumo Xi Murong Tuyuhun Tuoba Qifu Tufa Shiwei Didouyu Khitan Yelu ZubuGeneral characteristicsLanguages Languages of the Mongolic peoples belong to the Mongolic language family The Mongolic languages are a language family spoken in Eastern Europe Kalmykia Central Asia North Asia and East Asia The best known member of this language family Mongolian is the primary language of most of the residents of Mongolia and the Mongol residents of Inner Mongolia and Buryatia with an estimated 5 7 million speakers The Mongolic ethnicities possibly related to the Turkic and Tungusic peoples whose languages together would include in the hypothetical Altaic language family Religions The Mongolic peoples are predominantly followers of Tibetan Buddhism In 1576 the Gelug Tibetan school which was founded by the half Mongol Je Tsongkhapa became the state religion of Mongolia Some groups such as Dongxiangs and Bonan people adopted Sunni Islam as did Moghols in Afghanistan and Mughals in India Among a part of the population the ethnic religion namely Tengrism Mongolian shamanism is preserved A small number of Christians emerged under the influence of the Russian Church and Western missionaries Mongolian shamanism more broadly called the Mongolian folk religion or occasionally Tengerism according to whom as refers to the animistic and shamanic indigenous religion that has been practiced in Mongolia and its surrounding areas including Buryatia and Inner Mongolia as well as among Daur and other peoples at least since the age of recorded history In the earliest known stages it was intricately tied to all other aspects of social life and to the tribal organization of Mongolian society Along the way it has become influenced by and mingled with Buddhism Tengrism was transformed into a monotheistic religion only at the imperial level within aristocratic circles Culture The Culture of Mongolia has been heavily influenced by the Mongol nomadic way of life and shows similarities to other East Asian and Central Asian cultures The various Mongolic ethnic groups share a highly similar culture and traditions but have specific differences in clothing styles and cuisine Although Mongolian traditional clothing deel has changed little since the days of the empire there have been some changes in styles which distinguish modern Mongolian dress from historic costume Each tribe or clan has its own deel design distinguished by cut color and trimming Mongolian cuisine is primarily based on meat and dairy with some regional variations The most important public festivals are the Naadam A Naadam involves horse racing wrestling and archery competitions For families the most important festival is Tsagaan Sar Lunar New Year which is roughly equivalent to the Chinese New Year and usually falls into January or February Mongolia has a very old musical tradition Key traditional elements are throat singing the Morin Khuur horse head fiddle and other string instruments and several types of songs Mongolian melodies are typically characterized by pentatonic harmonies and long end notes Origin The ethnogenesis of Mongolic peoples is largely linked with the expansion of Ancient Northeast Asians They subsequently came into contact with other groups notably Sinitic peoples to their South and Western Steppe Herders to their far West The Mongolians pastoralist lifestyle may in part be derived from the Western Steppe Herders but without much geneflow between these two groups suggesting cultural transmission Genetics Mongols and other Mongolic speaking groups show high genetic affinity to each other followed by genetic proximity to Central and East Southeast Asian peoples The analysis of 175 Mongolic samples representing 6 ethnic groups incorporating results of the 1000 Genomes Project panel revealed genetic homogeneity between different Mongolic groups and that Northeast East and Southeast Asian populations are closer to each other than to other Eurasian populations Maternal lineages Mongolic peoples maternal lineages are primarily shared with East Asians 54 and Southeast Asians 28 while around 14 are shared with Europeans and other West Eurasian populations The remaining 4 are distributed throughout Eurasia and not associated with a specific group A study based on mtDNA noted that ancient populations in Mongolia had a mixed West and East Eurasian origin while modern Mongolians are characterized by substantially less West Eurasian maternal ancestry It is suggested that many West Eurasian mtDNA haplogroups in modern Mongolians are believed to have arrived around 2 500 5 000 years ago or the Mongolian Bronze Age A smaller number arrived in the early Iron Age Research by Rogers et al provides evidence that some West Eurasian maternal lineages had made it to Mongolia east of the Altai mountains prior to the Bronze Age During the medieval period a continuous increase in East Asian mitochondrial lineages was detected which these authors attribute to Genghis Khan s Pax Mongolica Paternal lineages An analysis of the paternal genetic diversity of Mongolians n 95 from Ulaangom n 100 from Dalandzadgad n 97 from Ulaanbaatar n 84 from Undurkhaan n 117 from Choibalsan performed by Toshimichi Yamamoto et alii at the Department of Legal Medicine and Bioethics Graduate School of Medicine Nagoya University Japan revealed a mean frequency of 59 0 Haplogroup C M217 49 5 Ulaanbaatar 57 1 Undurkhaan 59 0 Choibalsan 61 0 Dalandzadgad 68 4 Ulaangom 13 9 Haplogroup O M175 4 2 Ulaangom 11 0 Dalandzadgad 13 1 Undurkhaan 15 4 Choibalsan 25 8 Ulaanbaatar 11 3 Haplogroup N M231 8 2 Ulaanbaatar 8 4 Ulaangom 10 3 Choibalsan 14 0 Dalandzadgad 15 5 Undurkhaan 6 2 Haplogroup R 3 1 Ulaanbaatar 3 4 Choibalsan 3 6 Undurkhaan 7 0 Dalandzadgad 13 7 Ulaangom 3 5 Haplogroup D M174 1 1 Ulaangom 3 4 Choibalsan 4 0 Dalandzadgad 4 1 Ulaanbaatar 4 8 Undurkhaan and 2 8 Haplogroup Q1b 2 0 Dalandzadgad 2 4 Undurkhaan 3 1 Ulaanbaatar 3 2 Ulaangom 3 4 Choibalsan The authors noted that at least 4 major male ancestors with Y hg C3 have affected the gene pool of Mongolian males at the different periods producing star like clusters of Y STR haplotypes Most numerous on average are the members of C3 11 6 Ulaangom 14 4 Ulaanbaatar 28 6 Undurkhaan 29 9 Choibalsan 48 0 Dalandzadgad Second most numerous on average are the members of Haplogroup C3c 2 0 Dalandzadgad 16 7 Undurkhaan 17 1 Choibalsan 23 7 Ulaanbaatar 53 7 Ulaangom Third most numerous on average are the members of Haplogroup C3d i e C M407 3 2 Ulaangom 8 0 Dalandzadgad 8 5 Choibalsan 10 7 Undurkhaan 11 3 Ulaanbaatar A study based on ancient DNA and Y DNA found that ancient populations in the region of modern day Mongolia had a mixed West and East Eurasian origin during the Xiongnu period Male mediated Western Steppe Herders ancestry increased by the establishment of Turkic and Uyghur rule in Mongolia which was accompanied by an increase in the West Eurasian haplogroups R and J There was a male mediated rise in East Asian ancestry in the late medieval Mongolian period paralleling the increase of haplogroup C2b Autosomal DNA Genetic variation of Eurasian populations showing different frequency of West and East Eurasian components Genetic studies on Mongolic populations found them to be well fitted by a three way admixture of Ancient Northeast Asian like ANA ancestry with variable amounts of Yellow River Farmer like and Western Steppe Herders ancestries Mongols of Inner Mongolia were found to display genetic continuity with Late Medieval Mongol samples and can be modeled as 46 Ancient Northeast Asian 44 Yellow River Farmer and 10 West Eurasian Andronovo like Mongol Empire period samples carried between 55 64 Ancient Northeast Asian ancestry 21 27 Yellow River Farmer like sources and 15 18 Western Steppe Herder Sarmatian or Alan like sources One autosomal study on Oirat speaking Kalmyks living in Kalmykia Eastern Europe found them to be derived from a Western Mongolian source population Despite their long distance migration Kalmyks still display a predominant East Asian genetic profile Kalmyks derive around 80 East Asian ancestry and 20 Western Eurasian ancestry Two autosomal genetic studies on Inner Mongolians found that they are best modeled as a mixture of Ancient Northeast Asian like ANA and 10 to 25 East Asian Yellow River Farmer ancestry sources increasing among Khorchins to around 62 with only minor Western Eurasian genetic contributions 5 6 11 6 Estimated ancestry components among selected modern populations per Changmai et al 2022 The Yellow component represents East and Southeast Asian ESEA ancestries Mongolic peoples display genetic continuity to the Devil s Gate Cave specimen 7 000 BCE and the Amur13K specimen 13 000 BCE The Neolithic Northeast Asian ancestry is shared with other putative Altaic speaking peoples specifically Turkic and Tungusic speaking peoples together with shared IBD fragments in haplotype variation supporting a Northeast Asian origin of these three groups Turkic and Western Mongolic populations display the relatively highest amounts of West Eurasian admixture inline with historical contacts between Ancient Northeast Asians and West Eurasian populations of the Eurasian Steppes and evidence from linguistic borrowings In comparison Eastern Central and Southern Mongolic peoples as well as Tungusic peoples had considerable less West Eurasian ancestry but higher Yellow River farmers ancestry Sinitic peoples largely lacked any West Eurasian derived ancestry and displayed primarily affinity with historical Yellow River farmers NotesSome Mongolic ethnic groups are variously described as subgroups of Mongols or as separate ethnic groups for example the Buryats and the Kalmyks are recognized as distinct ethnolinguistic groups in Russia see 2010 Census and other The gene flow from Western Eurasian was preliminarily detected in Mongol population of TreeMix based phylogenetic tree the ancestral source was finally identified in qpAdm ranging from 5 6 to 11 6 in those Mongolian subgroups ALDER and GLOBETROTTER supported that the west east admixture event was recently estimated in the period ranging from Tang Dynasty to Yuan Dynasty We further performed haplotype based GLOBETROTTER to obtain a high resolution characterization of the admixture landscaped of three Mongolian subgroups All targets showed robust signals of west east admixture Supplementary Table S11 ReferencesCitations Ochir 2008 Zhukovskaia 2007 p 354 Nimaev 2011 Bai et al 2018 Wang et al 2021 Natalia Zhukovskaia 2005 Buryatskie shamanki na mezhdunarodnoj konferencii tunkinskij opyt iyul 2004 g Zhenshina i vozrozhdenie shamanizma Moskva Rossijskaya akademiya nauk Institut etnologii i antropologii imeni N N Mikluho Maklaya Page 129 In Russian zdes sformirovalsya tot etnicheskij sostav naseleniya kotoryj otnositelno stabilno sohranyaetsya do segodnyashnego dnya bulagaty hongodory sojoty kotorye odni ranshe drugie pozzhe voshli kak subetnosy v sostav buryat Nanzatov B Z 2003 Plemennoj sostav buryat v XIX veke Buryat tribe composition in the 19th century Narody i kultury Sibiri Vzaimodejstvie kak faktor formirovaniya i modernizacii in Russian Irkutsk pp 15 27 a href wiki Template Cite book title Template Cite book cite book a CS1 maint location missing publisher link Baldaev S P 1970 Rodoslovnye legendy i predaniya buryat Ch 1 in Russian Ulan Ude p 166 a href wiki Template Cite book title Template Cite book cite book a CS1 maint location missing publisher link Bacon 1951 Zhabagin M K 2017 Analiz svyazi polimorfizma Y hromosomy i rodoplemennoj struktury v kazahskoj populyacii Moscow p 71 In Russian za schet vysokoj chastoty gaplogruppy S2 M217 chto soglasuetsya s mongolskim proishozhdeniem hazarejcev Winston Robert ed 2004 Human The Definitive Visual Guide New York Dorling Kindersley p 432 ISBN 0 7566 0520 2 Janata A AYMAQ In Ehsan Yarshater ed Encyclopaedia Iranica Online ed United States Columbia University The Timuri once the most powerful of the lesser Aymaq had their original homeland in western Badghis Besides those still living there or in Khorasan there are settled Timuri south of Herat and near Shindand as well as to the north of Ghazni in Shiite Hazara country A group of Pashtunized nomadic Timuri has its winter quarters near Baghlan in northeastern Afghanistan Some of the best qualities of Herat Baluch carpets are woven by Timuri in Badghis classified by the name of the respective ṭaefa such as Kawdani Serḵani Yaʿqubḵani or Zakani Sabitov Zh M Bajmuhanov N B 2015 Y STR gaplotipy uzbekov ujgurov tadzhikov pushtunov hazarejcev mogolov iz bazy dannyh Family Tree DNA The Russian Journal of Genetic Genealogy in Russian 2 22 23 Janhunen 2003 Svantesson et al 2005 Pettazzoni 1956 Starostin George 2016 04 05 Altaic Languages Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics Oxford University Press doi 10 1093 acrefore 9780199384655 013 35 ISBN 978 0 19 938465 5 Heissig 1980 Pettazzoni 1956 Humphrey amp Onon 1996 Shimamura 2004 pp 649 51 Schlehe 2004 pp 283 96 Balogh 2010 pp 229 38 Bumochir 2014 pp 473 91 Quijada Graber amp Stephen 2015 pp 258 72 Bira 2011 p 14 Population dynamics and the rise of empires in Inner Asia Genome wide analysis spanning 6 000 years in the eastern Eurasian Steppe gives insights to the formation of Mongolia s empires ScienceDaily Retrieved 2023 06 04 Yang Xiaomin Sarengaowa He Guanglin Guo Jianxin Zhu Kongyang Ma Hao Zhao Jing Yang Meiqing Chen Jing Zhang Xianpeng Tao Le Liu Yilan Zhang Xiu Fang Wang Chuan Chao 2021 Genomic Insights Into the Genetic Structure and Natural Selection of Mongolians Frontiers in Genetics 12 735786 doi 10 3389 fgene 2021 735786 ISSN 1664 8021 PMC 8693022 PMID 34956310 Cheng Baoweng Tang Wenru He Li Dong Yongli Lu Jing Lei Yunping Yu Haijing Zhang Jiali Xiao Chunjie October 2008 Genetic imprint of the Mongol signal from phylogeographic analysis of mitochondrial DNA Journal of Human Genetics 53 10 905 913 doi 10 1007 s10038 008 0325 8 ISSN 1435 232X PMID 18769869 S2CID 6841794 Cardinali et al 2022 Finally a very few haplogroups originated in more recent times lt 3 kya and could be linked to historical events A post glacial expansion in eastern Asia was already proved for another mtDNA post glacial marker haplogroup U5b Achilli et al 2005 A later expansion can be probably connected to the climatic amelioration of the early Holocene that was accompanied by the development of farming and pastoralism and more sedentary communities A mixed ancestry between Yamnaya and European farmers was recently identified by analyzing ancient Bronze Age Mongolians Jeong et al 2020 Wang C C et al 2021 The lack of Mongolia specific sub branches might also suggest that the WEu lineages arrived in the Eastern Steppe in more recent times Certainly the ages of some WEu lineages between 5 and 3 kya could be linked to Bronze Age migrations across the Eurasian steppes that probably involved also the Afanasievo first ca 3300 2500 BCE and later the Sintashta culture ca 2100 1800 BCE Finally by searching the available database of ancient mitogenomes for WEu lineages identified in our modern Mongolians we identified 13 different sub lineages among remains excavated in Mongolia and dated after the Bronze Age They might testify for small population movements from the west less than 3 000 ya that can be probably related to commercial routes Actually the migration path from western Eurasia to Mongolia marked by some of these mitochondrial sub lineages H5a1 J1b2 T2g U2e1b U4b1a1a1 and U4b1a4 occurred about 2 500 ya thus temporally and geographically overlapping with the Silk Route while other sub haplogroups such as J1b1b1 and U2e1a1 seem to have arrived in Mongolia later Rogers Leland L Honeychurch William Amartuvshin Chunag Kaestle Frederika A 2020 U5A1 Mitochondrial DNA Haplotype Identified in Eneolithic Skeleton from Shatar Chuluu Mongolia Human Biology 91 4 213 223 doi 10 1353 hub 2017 0079 ISSN 1534 6617 PMID 32767893 Rogers Leland Liu Kaestle Frederika Ann April 2022 Analysis of mitochondrial DNA haplogroup frequencies in the population of the slab burial mortuary culture of Mongolia ca 1100 300 BCE American Journal of Biological Anthropology 177 4 644 657 doi 10 1002 ajpa 24478 S2CID 246508594 The K hg may represent an ancient addition from early western foragers that had intermixed with early agriculturalists Spengler 2015 similar with the probable origins of the C hg found in the ancient Ukraine Nikitin et al 2012 The J1c8a haplotype might be from a regional polymorphism that is linked to migrating populations after the expansion of agriculturalism from the Middle East perhaps associated with the development of caprine pastoralism that reached southeast Kazakhstan by at least 2800 BCE Hermes et al 2020 Cardinali et al 2022 Finally rather than finding long distance traces of the Mongol Empire expansion to the west we identified continuous and recent female mediated connections with neighboring Eastern Asian populations The geographically restricted sharing of haplotypes from typical EAs mtDNA lineages might represent an outcome of Genghis Khan s so called Pax Mongolica still detectable in present day Mongolians Yamamoto Toshimichi Senda Tomoki Horiba Daiki Sakuma Masayoshi Kawaguchi Yuuka Kano Yuuichi 2013 01 01 Y chromosome lineage in five regional Mongolian populations Forensic Science International Genetics Supplement Series Progress in Forensic Genetics 15 4 1 e260 e261 doi 10 1016 j fsigss 2013 10 133 ISSN 1875 1768 Jeong et al 2020 Jeong et al 2020 See Figure S2 We also observed that this East Asian related ancestry was brought into the Late Medieval populations more by male than female ancestors Overall Mongol period individuals characterized by a remarkable decrease in Western Eurasian ancestry compared to the preceding 1 600 years They are best modeled as a mixture of ANA like and East Asian like ancestry sources with only minor Western genetic ancestry In addition nearly a third of historic Mongol males 12 38 have Y haplogroup C2b which is also widespread among modern Mongolians Figure S3 Table S6 C2b is the presumed patrilineage of Genghis Khan Zerjal et al 2003 Li Hui Cho Kelly Kidd J Kidd K 2009 Genetic landscape of Eurasia and admixture in Uyghurs American Journal of Human Genetics 85 6 934 937 doi 10 1016 j ajhg 2009 10 024 PMC 2790568 PMID 20004770 S2CID 37591388 He Guang Lin Wang Meng Ge Zou Xing Yeh Hui Yuan Liu Chang Hui Liu Chao Chen Gang Wang Chuan Chao 2022 01 09 Extensive ethnolinguistic diversity at the crossroads of North China and South Siberia reflects multiple sources of genetic diversity Journal of Systematics and Evolution 61 1 230 250 doi 10 1111 jse 12827 ISSN 1674 4918 Here we found that western Mongolians shared a similar ancestry history with late Medieval Mongols which was descended 0 440 ancestry from YRB farmers 0 4592 from ARB Hunter Gatherers and 0 1008 from western Eurasian Andronovo Fig 7G H We also confirmed that early Medieval Turkic derived 68 ancestry from Neolithic Amur people Ancient Turkic people also contributed 30 of genetic materials to western Mongolians whose remaining ancestry derived from eastern Mongolian related ancient sources Fig 7I Jeong Choongwon Wang Ke Wilkin Shevan Taylor William Timothy Treal Miller Bryan K Bemmann Jan H Stahl Raphaela Chiovelli Chelsea Knolle Florian Ulziibayar Sodnom Khatanbaatar Dorjpurev Erdenebaatar Diimaajav Erdenebat Ulambayar Ochir Ayudai Ankhsanaa Ganbold 2020 11 12 A Dynamic 6 000 Year Genetic History of Eurasia s Eastern Steppe Cell 183 4 890 904 e29 doi 10 1016 j cell 2020 10 015 ISSN 0092 8674 PMC 7664836 PMID 33157037 Mongol era individuals as a group can be modeled with only 15 18 Western Steppe ancestry Alan or Sarmatian but require 55 64 Ulaanzuukh SlabGrave and 21 27 of Han related ancestry Table S5I Since the fall of the Mongol empire in 1368 CE the genetic profile of the Mongolian populations has not substantially changed Balinova Natalia Hudjasov Georgi Pankratov Vasili Pennarun Erwan Reidla Maere Metspalu Ene Batyrov Valery Khomyakova Irina Reisberg Tuuli Parik Juri Dzhaubermezov Murat Aiyzhy Elena Balinova Altana El chinova Galina Spitsyna Nailya 2024 04 11 Gene pool preservation across time and space In Mongolian speaking Oirats European Journal of Human Genetics 32 9 1150 1158 doi 10 1038 s41431 024 01588 w ISSN 1476 5438 PMC 11369229 PMID 38605123 Yang et al 2021 Changmai Piya Pinhasi Ron Pietrusewsky Michael Stark Miriam T Ikehara Quebral Rona Michi Reich David Flegontov Pavel 2022 12 29 Ancient DNA from Protohistoric Period Cambodia indicates that South Asians admixed with local populations as early as 1st 3rd centuries CE Scientific Reports 12 1 22507 Bibcode 2022NatSR 1222507C doi 10 1038 s41598 022 26799 3 ISSN 2045 2322 PMC 9800559 PMID 36581666 He Guang Lin Wang Meng Ge Zou Xing Yeh Hui Yuan Liu Chang Hui Liu Chao Chen Gang Wang Chuan Chao January 2023 Extensive ethnolinguistic diversity at the crossroads of North China and South Siberia reflects multiple sources of genetic diversity Journal of Systematics and Evolution 61 1 230 250 doi 10 1111 jse 12827 ISSN 1674 4918 S2CID 245849003 Sikora Martin Pitulko Vladimir V Sousa Vitor C Allentoft Morten E Vinner Lasse Rasmussen Simon Margaryan Ashot de Barros Damgaard Peter de la Fuente Constanza Renaud Gabriel Yang Melinda A Fu Qiaomei Dupanloup Isabelle Giampoudakis Konstantinos Nogues Bravo David 2019 The population history of northeastern Siberia since the Pleistocene Nature 570 7760 182 188 Bibcode 2019Natur 570 182S doi 10 1038 s41586 019 1279 z hdl 1887 3198847 ISSN 1476 4687 PMID 31168093 S2CID 174809069 Most modern Siberian speakers of Neosiberian languages genetically fall on an East West cline between Europeans and Early East Asians Taking Even speakers as representatives the Neosiberian turnover from the south which largely replaced Ancient Paleosiberian ancestry can be associated with the northward spread of Tungusic and probably also Turkic and Mongolic However the expansions of Tungusic as well as Turkic and Mongolic are too recent to be associable with the earliest waves of Neosiberian ancestry dated later than 11 kya but discernible in the Baikal region from at least 6 kya onwards Therefore this phase of the Neosiberian population turnover must initially have transmitted other languages or language families into Siberia including possibly Uralic and Yukaghir Sources General Nimaev Daba 2011 Mongolskie narody Etnicheskaya istoriya i sovremennye etnokulturnye processy The Mongolic Peoples Ethnic History and Contemporary Ethnocultural Processes in Russian Lambert Academic Publishing ISBN 978 3843324403 Ochir Taĭzhiud Ai u udaĭn 2008 Sh Choĭmaa ed Mongolchuudyn garal nershil On the origin of Mongolian family clan names and ethnonyms in Mongolian Ulaanbaatar International Institute for the Study of Nomadic Civilizations ISBN 9789992959978 OCLC 505674246 Zhukovskaia Natalia L 2007 1998 Mongolskie narody Mongolic peoples In L M Mints ed Narody mira Enciklopediya Peoples of the World an Encyclopedia in Russian Moscow OLMA Media Group pp 354 356 ISBN 978 5 373 01057 3 Genetic researches Bai Haihua Guo Xiaosen Zhang Dong Narisu Narisu Bu Junjie Jirimutu Jirimutu Liang Fan Zhao Xiang Xing Yanping Wang Dingzhu Li Tongda 2014 12 01 The Genome of a Mongolian Individual Reveals the Genetic Imprints of Mongolians on Modern Human Populations Genome Biology and Evolution 6 12 3122 3136 doi 10 1093 gbe evu242 ISSN 1759 6653 PMC 4540083 PMID 25377941 Bai Haihua Guo Xiaosen Narisu Narisu Lan Tianming Wu Qizhu Xing Yanping Zhang Yong Bond Stephen R Pei Zhili Zhang Yanru Zhang Dandan December 2018 Whole genome sequencing of 175 Mongolians uncovers population specific genetic architecture and gene flow throughout North and East Asia Nature Genetics 50 12 1696 1704 doi 10 1038 s41588 018 0250 5 ISSN 1546 1718 PMID 30397334 S2CID 53222895 Cardinali Irene Bodner Martin Capodiferro Marco Rosario Amory Christina Rambaldi Migliore Nicola Gomez Edgar J Myagmar Erdene Dashzeveg Tumen Carano Francesco Woodward Scott R Parson Walther 2022 Mitochondrial DNA Footprints from Western Eurasia in Modern Mongolia Frontiers in Genetics 12 819337 doi 10 3389 fgene 2021 819337 ISSN 1664 8021 PMC 8773455 PMID 35069708 Wang Mengge He Guanglin Gao Shuang Jia Fuquan Zou Xing Liu Jing Wang Shouyu Ye Ziwei Hou Yiping Wang Zheng 2021 07 01 Molecular genetic survey and forensic characterization of Chinese Mongolians via the 47 autosomal insertion deletion marker Genomics 113 4 2199 2210 doi 10 1016 j ygeno 2021 05 010 ISSN 0888 7543 PMID 34022340 S2CID 235126419 Yang Xiaomin Sarengaowa He Guanglin Guo Jianxin Zhu Kongyang Ma Hao Zhao Jing Yang Meiqing Chen Jing Zhang Xianpeng Tao Le 2021 Genomic Insights Into the Genetic Structure and Natural Selection of Mongolians Frontiers in Genetics 12 735 786 doi 10 3389 fgene 2021 735786 ISSN 1664 8021 PMC 8693022 PMID 34956310 Linguistics Janhunen Juha ed 2003 The Mongolic languages Routledge Language Family Series London New York Routledge ISBN 978 0 7007 1133 8 Svantesson Jan Olof Tsendina Anna Karlsson Anastasia Franzen Vivan 2005 The Phonology of Mongolian New York Oxford University Press Religious studies Balogh Matyas 2010 Contemporary shamanisms in Mongolia Asian Ethnicity 11 2 229 38 doi 10 1080 14631361003779489 S2CID 145595446 Bira Shagdaryn 2011 Mongolyn tengerijn үzel tүүver zohiol barimt bichgүүd Mongolian Tengerism selected papers and documents in Mongolian Ulaanbaatar Sodpress ISBN 9789992955932 Bumochir D 2014 Institutionalization of Mongolian shamanism from primitivism to civilization Asian Ethnicity 15 4 473 91 doi 10 1080 14631369 2014 939331 S2CID 145329835 Heissig Walther 1980 1970 The religions of Mongolia Translated by G Samuel London Henley Routledge Kegan Paul ISBN 0 7103 0685 7 Humphrey Caroline Onon Urgunge 1996 Shamans and Elders Experience Knowledge and Power among the Daur Mongols Oxford Clarendon Press Pettazzoni Raffaele 1956 1955 Turco Mongols and Related Peoples The All Knowing God Researches into Early Religion and Culture Translated by H J Rose London a href wiki Template Cite book title Template Cite book cite book a CS1 maint location missing publisher link Quijada Jastine B Graber Kathryn E Stephen Eric 2015 Finding Their Own Revitalizing Buryat Culture Through Shamanic Practices in Ulan Ude Problems of Post Communism 62 5 258 72 doi 10 1080 10758216 2015 1057040 S2CID 143106014 Schlehe Judith 2004 Shamanism in Mongolia and in New Age Movements In Rasuly Paleczek Gabriele ed Central Asia on Display Proceedings of the VIIth Conference of the European Society for Central Asian Studies Vol 1 Vienna LIT Verlag pp 283 96 ISBN 3 8258 8309 4 Shimamura Ippei 2004 Yellow Shamans Mongolia In Walter Mariko Namba Neumann Fridman Eva Jane eds Shamanism An Encyclopedia of World Beliefs Practices and Culture Vol 1 Santa Barbara Ca ABC Clio pp 649 51 ISBN 9781576076453 Ethnic groups Bacon Elizabeth Emaline 1951 The Hazara Mongols of Afghanistan A Study in Social Organization Berkeley Ca University of California