In linguistics, a distinctive feature is the most basic unit of phonological structure that distinguishes one sound from another within a language. For example, the feature [+voice] distinguishes the two bilabial plosives: [p] and [b] (i.e., it makes the two plosives distinct from one another). There are many different ways of defining and arranging features into feature systems: some deal with only one language while others are developed to apply to all languages.
Distinctive features are grouped into categories according to the natural classes of segments they describe: major class features, laryngeal features, manner features, and place features. These feature categories in turn are further specified on the basis of the phonetic properties of the segments in question.
Since the inception of the phonological analysis of distinctive features in the 1950s, features traditionally have been specified by binary values to signify whether a segment is described by the feature; a positive value, [+], denotes the presence of a feature, while a negative value, [−], indicates its absence. In addition, a phoneme may be unmarked with respect to a feature. It is also possible for certain phonemes to have different features across languages. For example, [l] could be classified as a continuant or not in a given language depending on how it patterns with other consonants. After the first distinctive feature theory was created by Russian linguist Roman Jakobson in 1941, it was assumed that the distinctive features are binary and this theory about distinctive features being binary was formally adopted in "Sound Pattern of English" by Noam Chomsky and Morris Halle in 1968. Jakobson saw the binary approach as the best way to make the phoneme inventory shorter and the phonological oppositions are naturally binary.
In recent developments[when?] to the theory of distinctive features, phonologists have proposed the existence of single-valued features. These features, called univalent or , can only describe the classes of segments that are said to possess those features, and not the classes that are without them.
List
This section lists and describes distinctive features in linguistics.
Major class
Major class features: The features that represent the major classes of sounds.
- [+/− syllabic] Syllabic segments may function as the nucleus of a syllable, while their counterparts, the [−syll] segments, may not. Except in the case of syllabic consonants, [+syllabic] designates all vowels, while [−syllabic] designates all consonants (including glides).
- [+/− consonantal] Consonantal segments are produced with an audible constriction in the vocal tract, such as obstruents, nasals, liquids, and trills. Vowels, glides and laryngeal segments are not consonantal.
- [+/− approximant] Approximant segments include vowels, glides, and liquids while excluding nasals and obstruents.
- [+/− sonorant] This feature describes the type of oral constriction that can occur in the vocal tract. [+son] designates the vowels and sonorant consonants (namely glides, liquids, and nasals) that are produced without an imbalance of air pressure in the vocal tract that might cause turbulence. [−son] describes the obstruents, articulated with a noticeable turbulence caused by an imbalance of air pressure in the vocal tract.
Laryngeal
Laryngeal features: The features that specify the glottal states of sounds.
- [+/− voice] This feature indicates whether vibration of the vocal folds occurs with the articulation of the segment.
- [+/− spread glottis] Used to indicate the aspiration of a segment, this feature denotes the openness of the glottis. For [+sg], the vocal folds are spread apart widely enough for friction to occur; for [−sg], there is not the same friction-inducing spreading.
- [+/− constricted glottis] The constricted glottis feature denotes the degree of closure of the glottis. [+cg] implies that the vocal folds are held closely together, enough so that air cannot pass through momentarily, while [−cg] implies the opposite. [+cg] sounds include glottalized, ejective and implosive consonants, as well as the glottal stop.
Manner
Manner features: The features that specify the manner of articulation.
- [+/− continuant] This feature describes the passage of air through the vocal tract. [+cont] segments are produced without any significant obstruction in the tract, allowing air to pass through in a continuous stream. [−cont] segments, on the other hand, have such an obstruction, and so occlude the air flow at some point of articulation.
- [+/− nasal] This feature describes the position of the velum. [+nas] segments are produced by lowering the velum so that air can pass through the nasal tract. [−nas] segments conversely are produced with a raised velum, blocking the passage of air from the nasal tract and shunting it to the oral tract.
- [+/− strident] The strident feature applies to obstruents only and refers to a type of friction that is noisier than usual. This is caused by high energy white noise.
- [+/− lateral] This feature designates the shape and positioning of the tongue with respect to the oral tract. [+lat] segments are produced as the center of the tongue rises to contact the roof of the mouth, thereby blocking air from flowing centrally through the oral tract and instead forcing more lateral flow along the lowered side(s) of the tongue.
- [+/− delayed release] This feature distinguishes stops from affricates. Affricates are designated [+del rel]
Place
Place features: The features that specify the place of articulation.
- [ LABIAL ] Labial segments are articulated with the lips. As consonants, these include bilabial and labiodental consonants.
- [+/− round]: [+round] are produced with lip rounding, while [−round] are not.
- [ CORONAL ] Coronal sounds are articulated with the tip and/or blade of the tongue. These include a large number of consonants, which can be made with the tip, blade or underside of the tongue (apical, laminal, or subapical consonant, respectively), making contact with the upper lip (linguolabial), between the teeth (interdental), with the back of the teeth (dental), with the alveolar ridge (alveolar), behind the alveolar ridge (postalveolar), or on or in front of the hard palate ((pre)palatal). With postalveolar sibilants, additional tongue shapes need to be distinguished, i.e. "domed" or slightly palatalized ("hushing" or "palato-alveolar"), palatalized (alveolopalatal), and "closed" ("hissing-hushing").
- [+/− anterior]: Anterior segments are articulated with the tip or blade of the tongue at or in front of the alveolar ridge. Dental consonants are [+ant], postalveolar and retroflex ones are [−ant].
- [+/− distributed]: For [+dist] segments the tongue is extended for some distance in the mouth. In other words, laminal dental and postalveolar consonants are marked as [+dist], while apical alveolar and retroflex consonants are [−dist].
- [ DORSAL ] Dorsal sounds are articulated by raising the dorsum of the tongue. All vowels are dorsal sounds. Dorsal consonants include palatal, velar and uvular consonants.
- [+/− high]: [+high] segments raise the dorsum close to the palate. [−high] segments do not.
- [+/− low]: [+low] segments bunch the dorsum to a position low in the mouth.
- [+/− back]: [+back] segments are produced with the tongue dorsum bunched and retracted slightly to the back of the mouth. [−back] segments are bunched and extended slightly forward.
- [+/− tense]: This feature (mainly) applies to the position of the root of the tongue when articulating vowels. [+tense] vowels have an advanced tongue root. In fact, this feature is often referred to as advanced tongue root (ATR), although there is a debate on whether tense and ATR are the same or different features.
- [ RADICAL ] Radical sounds are articulated with the root of the tongue. These include epiglottal consonants.
- [+/− advanced tongue root]: [+ATR] segments advance the root of the tongue.
- [+/− retracted tongue root]: [+RTR] segments bunch the root of the tongue towards the pharyngeal wall and activate the pharyngeal constrictor muscles
- [ GLOTTAL ][citation needed] Purely glottal sounds do not involve the tongue at all. These are the glottal consonants.
Vowel space
Vowels are distinguished by
- [+/− back] (back vowels)
- [+/− high] (close vowels)
- [+/− low] (low vowels)
- [+/− tense] (tense vowels)
However, laryngoscopic studies suggest these features[citation needed]
- [+/− front] (front vowels)
- [+/− raised] (raised vowels)
- [+/− retracted] (retracted vowels)
- [+/− round] (round vowels)
Jakobsonian system
This system is given by Jakobson & Halle (1971, 3.6, 3.7).
Sonority
- [+/− vocalic] vocalic, non-vocalic
- [+/− consonantal] consonantal, non-consonantal
- [+/− nasal] nasal, oral
- [+/− compact] forward-flanged: velar and palatal consonant, wide vowel[clarification needed]
- [+/− diffuse] backward-flanged: labial and coronal, narrow vowel[clarification needed]
- [+/− abrupt]
- [+/− strident] strident, mellow
- [+/− checked]
Protensity
- [+/− tense]
Tonality
- [+/− grave] peripheral consonant, back vowel
- [+/− acute]
- [+/− medial] coronal or palatal consonant, front vowel
- [+/− flat] narrowed slit, wider slit
- [+/− sharp] widened slit, narrower slit
Other uses
The concept of a distinctive feature matrix to distinguish similar elements is identified with phonology, but there have been at least two efforts to use a distinctive feature matrix in related fields. Close to phonology, and clearly acknowledging its debt to phonology, distinctive features have been used to describe and differentiate handshapes in fingerspelling in American Sign Language. Distinctive features have also been used to distinguish proverbs from other types of language such as slogans, clichés, and aphorisms.
Analogous feature systems are also used throughout Natural Language Processing (NLP). For example, part-of-speech tagging divides words into categories. These include "major" categories such as Noun vs. Verb, but also other dimensions such as person and number, plurality, tense, and others. Some mnemonics for part-of-speech tags conjoin multiple features, such as "NN" for singular noun, vs. "NNS" for plural noun, vs. "NNS$" for plural possessive noun (see Brown Corpus). Others provide more explicit separation of features, even formalizing them via markup such as the Text Encoding Initiative's feature structures. Modern statistical NLP uses vectors of very many features, although many of those features are not formally "distinctive" in the sense described here.
See also
- Feature geometry
References
- Ladefoged, Peter (2012). Vowels and consonants. Sandra Ferrari Disner (3 ed.). Malden, MA. pp. 195–196. ISBN 978-1-4443-3429-6. OCLC 740281727.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Gussenhoven & Jacobs 2017, p. 64-65.
- Gussenhoven & Jacobs 2017, p. 72-73.
- Administration. "Distinctive features". Macquarie University. Retrieved 2021-05-19.
- Gussenhoven & Jacobs 2017, p. 65.
- Gussenhoven & Jacobs 2017, pp. 66–81.
- Arnaudova, Olga. "Overview of Distinctive Features". University of Ottawa. Archived from the original on 13 May 2021. Retrieved 19 May 2021.
- "The Distinctive Features of English Phonemes Definitions". Harvard Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Archived from the original on 17 September 2021. Retrieved 19 May 2021.
- Godsave, Bruce. 1974. An investigation of the feasibility of using a particular distinctive feature matrix for recording and categorizing fingerspelling errors. University of Cincinnati, doctoral dissertation.
- p. 73. Norrick, Neal. 1985. How Proverbs Mean: Semantic Studies in English Proverbs. de Gruyter.
Sources
- Chomsky, Noam; Halle, Morris (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
- Clements, George N. (1985). "The geometry of phonological features". Phonology Yearbook. 2: 225–252. doi:10.1017/S0952675700000440. S2CID 62237665.
- Flynn, Darin (2006). "Articulator Theory" (PDF). University of Calgary. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-01-01.
- Hall, T. A. (2007). "Chapter 13. Segmental features". In de Lacy, Paul (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 311–334.
- Gussenhoven, Carlos; Jacobs, Haike (2017). Understanding Phonology. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-138-96141-8.
- Jakobson, Roman; Fant, Gunnar; Halle, Morris (1952). Preliminaries to Speech Analysis: the Distinctive Features and their Correlates. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
- Jakobson, Roman; Halle, Morris (1971). Fundamentals of Language. The Hague: Mouton.
In linguistics a distinctive feature is the most basic unit of phonological structure that distinguishes one sound from another within a language For example the feature voice distinguishes the two bilabial plosives p and b i e it makes the two plosives distinct from one another There are many different ways of defining and arranging features into feature systems some deal with only one language while others are developed to apply to all languages Distinctive features are grouped into categories according to the natural classes of segments they describe major class features laryngeal features manner features and place features These feature categories in turn are further specified on the basis of the phonetic properties of the segments in question Since the inception of the phonological analysis of distinctive features in the 1950s features traditionally have been specified by binary values to signify whether a segment is described by the feature a positive value denotes the presence of a feature while a negative value indicates its absence In addition a phoneme may be unmarked with respect to a feature It is also possible for certain phonemes to have different features across languages For example l could be classified as a continuant or not in a given language depending on how it patterns with other consonants After the first distinctive feature theory was created by Russian linguist Roman Jakobson in 1941 it was assumed that the distinctive features are binary and this theory about distinctive features being binary was formally adopted in Sound Pattern of English by Noam Chomsky and Morris Halle in 1968 Jakobson saw the binary approach as the best way to make the phoneme inventory shorter and the phonological oppositions are naturally binary In recent developments when to the theory of distinctive features phonologists have proposed the existence of single valued features These features called univalent or can only describe the classes of segments that are said to possess those features and not the classes that are without them ListEuler diagram showing a typical classification of sounds in IPA and their manners of articulation and distinctive features This section lists and describes distinctive features in linguistics Major class Major class features The features that represent the major classes of sounds syllabic Syllabic segments may function as the nucleus of a syllable while their counterparts the syll segments may not Except in the case of syllabic consonants syllabic designates all vowels while syllabic designates all consonants including glides consonantal Consonantal segments are produced with an audible constriction in the vocal tract such as obstruents nasals liquids and trills Vowels glides and laryngeal segments are not consonantal approximant Approximant segments include vowels glides and liquids while excluding nasals and obstruents sonorant This feature describes the type of oral constriction that can occur in the vocal tract son designates the vowels and sonorant consonants namely glides liquids and nasals that are produced without an imbalance of air pressure in the vocal tract that might cause turbulence son describes the obstruents articulated with a noticeable turbulence caused by an imbalance of air pressure in the vocal tract Laryngeal Laryngeal features The features that specify the glottal states of sounds voice This feature indicates whether vibration of the vocal folds occurs with the articulation of the segment spread glottis Used to indicate the aspiration of a segment this feature denotes the openness of the glottis For sg the vocal folds are spread apart widely enough for friction to occur for sg there is not the same friction inducing spreading constricted glottis The constricted glottis feature denotes the degree of closure of the glottis cg implies that the vocal folds are held closely together enough so that air cannot pass through momentarily while cg implies the opposite cg sounds include glottalized ejective and implosive consonants as well as the glottal stop Manner Manner features The features that specify the manner of articulation continuant This feature describes the passage of air through the vocal tract cont segments are produced without any significant obstruction in the tract allowing air to pass through in a continuous stream cont segments on the other hand have such an obstruction and so occlude the air flow at some point of articulation nasal This feature describes the position of the velum nas segments are produced by lowering the velum so that air can pass through the nasal tract nas segments conversely are produced with a raised velum blocking the passage of air from the nasal tract and shunting it to the oral tract strident The strident feature applies to obstruents only and refers to a type of friction that is noisier than usual This is caused by high energy white noise lateral This feature designates the shape and positioning of the tongue with respect to the oral tract lat segments are produced as the center of the tongue rises to contact the roof of the mouth thereby blocking air from flowing centrally through the oral tract and instead forcing more lateral flow along the lowered side s of the tongue delayed release This feature distinguishes stops from affricates Affricates are designated del rel Place Place features The features that specify the place of articulation LABIAL Labial segments are articulated with the lips As consonants these include bilabial and labiodental consonants round round are produced with lip rounding while round are not CORONAL Coronal sounds are articulated with the tip and or blade of the tongue These include a large number of consonants which can be made with the tip blade or underside of the tongue apical laminal or subapical consonant respectively making contact with the upper lip linguolabial between the teeth interdental with the back of the teeth dental with the alveolar ridge alveolar behind the alveolar ridge postalveolar or on or in front of the hard palate pre palatal With postalveolar sibilants additional tongue shapes need to be distinguished i e domed or slightly palatalized hushing or palato alveolar palatalized alveolopalatal and closed hissing hushing anterior Anterior segments are articulated with the tip or blade of the tongue at or in front of the alveolar ridge Dental consonants are ant postalveolar and retroflex ones are ant distributed For dist segments the tongue is extended for some distance in the mouth In other words laminal dental and postalveolar consonants are marked as dist while apical alveolar and retroflex consonants are dist DORSAL Dorsal sounds are articulated by raising the dorsum of the tongue All vowels are dorsal sounds Dorsal consonants include palatal velar and uvular consonants high high segments raise the dorsum close to the palate high segments do not low low segments bunch the dorsum to a position low in the mouth back back segments are produced with the tongue dorsum bunched and retracted slightly to the back of the mouth back segments are bunched and extended slightly forward tense This feature mainly applies to the position of the root of the tongue when articulating vowels tense vowels have an advanced tongue root In fact this feature is often referred to as advanced tongue root ATR although there is a debate on whether tense and ATR are the same or different features RADICAL Radical sounds are articulated with the root of the tongue These include epiglottal consonants advanced tongue root ATR segments advance the root of the tongue retracted tongue root RTR segments bunch the root of the tongue towards the pharyngeal wall and activate the pharyngeal constrictor muscles GLOTTAL citation needed Purely glottal sounds do not involve the tongue at all These are the glottal consonants Vowel space Vowels are distinguished by back back vowels high close vowels low low vowels tense tense vowels However laryngoscopic studies suggest these features citation needed front front vowels raised raised vowels retracted retracted vowels round round vowels Jakobsonian systemThis system is given by Jakobson amp Halle 1971 3 6 3 7 Sonority vocalic vocalic non vocalic consonantal consonantal non consonantal nasal nasal oral compact forward flanged velar and palatal consonant wide vowel clarification needed diffuse backward flanged labial and coronal narrow vowel clarification needed abrupt strident strident mellow checked Protensity tense Tonality grave peripheral consonant back vowel acute medial coronal or palatal consonant front vowel flat narrowed slit wider slit sharp widened slit narrower slitOther usesThe concept of a distinctive feature matrix to distinguish similar elements is identified with phonology but there have been at least two efforts to use a distinctive feature matrix in related fields Close to phonology and clearly acknowledging its debt to phonology distinctive features have been used to describe and differentiate handshapes in fingerspelling in American Sign Language Distinctive features have also been used to distinguish proverbs from other types of language such as slogans cliches and aphorisms Analogous feature systems are also used throughout Natural Language Processing NLP For example part of speech tagging divides words into categories These include major categories such as Noun vs Verb but also other dimensions such as person and number plurality tense and others Some mnemonics for part of speech tags conjoin multiple features such as NN for singular noun vs NNS for plural noun vs NNS for plural possessive noun see Brown Corpus Others provide more explicit separation of features even formalizing them via markup such as the Text Encoding Initiative s feature structures Modern statistical NLP uses vectors of very many features although many of those features are not formally distinctive in the sense described here See alsoFeature geometryReferencesLadefoged Peter 2012 Vowels and consonants Sandra Ferrari Disner 3 ed Malden MA pp 195 196 ISBN 978 1 4443 3429 6 OCLC 740281727 a href wiki Template Cite book title Template Cite book cite book a CS1 maint location missing publisher link Gussenhoven amp Jacobs 2017 p 64 65 Gussenhoven amp Jacobs 2017 p 72 73 Administration Distinctive features Macquarie University Retrieved 2021 05 19 Gussenhoven amp Jacobs 2017 p 65 Gussenhoven amp Jacobs 2017 pp 66 81 Arnaudova Olga Overview of Distinctive Features University of Ottawa Archived from the original on 13 May 2021 Retrieved 19 May 2021 The Distinctive Features of English Phonemes Definitions Harvard Faculty of Arts and Sciences Archived from the original on 17 September 2021 Retrieved 19 May 2021 Godsave Bruce 1974 An investigation of the feasibility of using a particular distinctive feature matrix for recording and categorizing fingerspelling errors University of Cincinnati doctoral dissertation p 73 Norrick Neal 1985 How Proverbs Mean Semantic Studies in English Proverbs de Gruyter SourcesChomsky Noam Halle Morris 1968 The Sound Pattern of English New York Harper and Row Clements George N 1985 The geometry of phonological features Phonology Yearbook 2 225 252 doi 10 1017 S0952675700000440 S2CID 62237665 Flynn Darin 2006 Articulator Theory PDF University of Calgary Archived from the original PDF on 2011 01 01 Hall T A 2007 Chapter 13 Segmental features In de Lacy Paul ed The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology Cambridge Cambridge University Press pp 311 334 Gussenhoven Carlos Jacobs Haike 2017 Understanding Phonology Routledge ISBN 978 1 138 96141 8 Jakobson Roman Fant Gunnar Halle Morris 1952 Preliminaries to Speech Analysis the Distinctive Features and their Correlates Cambridge Massachusetts MIT Press Jakobson Roman Halle Morris 1971 Fundamentals of Language The Hague Mouton