
Symmetry in biology refers to the symmetry observed in organisms, including plants, animals, fungi, and bacteria. External symmetry can be easily seen by just looking at an organism. For example, the face of a human being has a plane of symmetry down its centre, or a pine cone displays a clear symmetrical spiral pattern. Internal features can also show symmetry, for example the tubes in the human body (responsible for transporting gases, nutrients, and waste products) which are cylindrical and have several planes of symmetry.


Biological symmetry can be thought of as a balanced distribution of duplicate body parts or shapes within the body of an organism. Importantly, unlike in mathematics, symmetry in biology is always approximate. For example, plant leaves – while considered symmetrical – rarely match up exactly when folded in half. Symmetry is one class of patterns in nature whereby there is near-repetition of the pattern element, either by reflection or rotation.
While sponges and placozoans represent two groups of animals which do not show any symmetry (i.e. are asymmetrical), the body plans of most multicellular organisms exhibit, and are defined by, some form of symmetry. There are only a few types of symmetry which are possible in body plans. These are radial (cylindrical) symmetry, bilateral, biradial and spherical symmetry. While the classification of viruses as an "organism" remains controversial, viruses also contain icosahedral symmetry.
The importance of symmetry is illustrated by the fact that groups of animals have traditionally been defined by this feature in taxonomic groupings. The Radiata, animals with radial symmetry, formed one of the four branches of Georges Cuvier's classification of the animal kingdom. Meanwhile, Bilateria is a taxonomic grouping still used today to represent organisms with embryonic bilateral symmetry.
Radial symmetry
Organisms with radial symmetry show a repeating pattern around a central axis such that they can be separated into several identical pieces when cut through the central point, much like pieces of a pie. Typically, this involves repeating a body part 4, 5, 6 or 8 times around the axis – referred to as tetramerism, pentamerism, hexamerism and octamerism, respectively. Such organisms exhibit no left or right sides but do have a top and a bottom surface, or a front and a back.
George Cuvier classified animals with radial symmetry in the taxon Radiata (Zoophytes), which is now generally accepted to be an assemblage of different animal phyla that do not share a single common ancestor (a polyphyletic group). Most radially symmetric animals are symmetrical about an axis extending from the center of the oral surface, which contains the mouth, to the center of the opposite (aboral) end. Animals in the phyla Cnidaria and Echinodermata generally show radial symmetry, although many sea anemones and some corals within the Cnidaria have bilateral symmetry defined by a single structure, the siphonoglyph. Radial symmetry is especially suitable for sessile animals such as the sea anemone, floating animals such as jellyfish, and slow moving organisms such as starfish; whereas bilateral symmetry favours locomotion by generating a streamlined body.
Many flowers are also radially symmetric, or "actinomorphic". Roughly identical floral structures – petals, sepals, and stamens – occur at regular intervals around the axis of the flower, which is often the female reproductive organ containing the carpel, style and stigma.
Subtypes of radial symmetry
Three-fold triradial symmetry was present in Trilobozoa from the Late Ediacaran period.
Four-fold tetramerism appears in some jellyfish, such as Aurelia marginalis. This is immediately obvious when looking at the jellyfish due to the presence of four gonads, visible through its translucent body. This radial symmetry is ecologically important in allowing the jellyfish to detect and respond to stimuli (mainly food and danger) from all directions.
Flowering plants show five-fold pentamerism, in many of their flowers and fruits. This is easily seen through the arrangement of five carpels (seed pockets) in an apple when cut transversely. Among animals, only the echinoderms such as sea stars, sea urchins, and sea lilies are pentamerous as adults, with five arms arranged around the mouth. Being bilaterian animals, however, they initially develop with mirror symmetry as larvae, then gain pentaradial symmetry later.
Hexamerism is found in the corals and sea anemones (class Anthozoa), which are divided into two groups based on their symmetry. The most common corals in the subclass Hexacorallia have a hexameric body plan; their polyps have six-fold internal symmetry and a number of tentacles that is a multiple of six.
Octamerism is found in corals of the subclass Octocorallia. These have polyps with eight tentacles and octameric radial symmetry. The octopus, however, has bilateral symmetry, despite its eight arms.
Icosahedral symmetry
Icosahedral symmetry occurs in an organism which contains 60 subunits generated by 20 faces, each an equilateral triangle, and 12 corners. Within the icosahedron there is 2-fold, 3-fold and 5-fold symmetry. Many viruses, including canine parvovirus, show this form of symmetry due to the presence of an icosahedral viral shell. Such symmetry has evolved because it allows the viral particle to be built up of repetitive subunits consisting of a limited number of structural proteins (encoded by viral genes), thereby saving space in the viral genome. The icosahedral symmetry can still be maintained with more than 60 subunits, but only in multiples of 60. For example, the T=3 Tomato bushy stunt virus has 60x3 protein subunits (180 copies of the same structural protein). Although these viruses are often referred to as 'spherical', they do not show true mathematical spherical symmetry.
In the early 20th century, Ernst Haeckel described (Haeckel, 1904) a number of species of Radiolaria, some of whose skeletons are shaped like various regular polyhedra. Examples include Circoporus octahedrus, Circogonia icosahedra, Lithocubus geometricus and Circorrhegma dodecahedra. The shapes of these creatures should be obvious from their names. Tetrahedral symmetry is not present in Callimitra agnesae.
Spherical symmetry
Spherical symmetry is characterised by the ability to draw an endless, or great but finite, number of symmetry axes through the body. This means that spherical symmetry occurs in an organism if it is able to be cut into two identical halves through any cut that runs through the organism's center. True spherical symmetry is not found in animal body plans. Organisms which show approximate spherical symmetry include the freshwater green alga Volvox.
Bacteria are often referred to as having a 'spherical' shape. Bacteria are categorized based on their shapes into three classes: cocci (spherical-shaped), bacillus (rod-shaped) and spirochetes (spiral-shaped) cells. In reality, this is a severe over-simplification as bacterial cells can be curved, bent, flattened, oblong spheroids and many more shapes. Due to the huge number of bacteria considered to be cocci (coccus if a single cell), it is unlikely that all of these show true spherical symmetry. It is important to distinguish between the generalized use of the word 'spherical' to describe organisms at ease, and the true meaning of spherical symmetry. The same situation is seen in the description of viruses – 'spherical' viruses do not necessarily show spherical symmetry, being usually icosahedral.
Bilateral symmetry
Organisms with bilateral symmetry contain a single plane of symmetry, the sagittal plane, which divides the organism into two roughly mirror image left and right halves – approximate reflectional symmetry.
Animals with bilateral symmetry are classified into a large group called the bilateria, which contains 99% of all animals (comprising over 32 phyla and 1 million described species). All bilaterians have some asymmetrical features; for example, the human heart and liver are positioned asymmetrically despite the body having external bilateral symmetry.
The bilateral symmetry of bilaterians is a complex trait which develops due to the expression of many genes. The bilateria have two axes of polarity. The first is an anterior–posterior (AP) axis which can be visualised as an imaginary axis running from the head or mouth to the tail or other end of an organism. The second is the dorsal–ventral (DV) axis which runs perpendicular to the AP axis. During development the AP axis is always specified before the DV axis, which is known as the second embryonic axis.
The AP axis is essential in defining the polarity of bilateria and allowing the development of a front and back to give the organism direction. The front end encounters the environment before the rest of the body so sensory organs such as eyes tend to be clustered there. This is also the site where a mouth develops since it is the first part of the body to encounter food. Therefore, a distinct head, with sense organs connected to a central nervous system, tends to develop. This pattern of development (with a distinct head and tail) is called cephalization. It is also argued that the development of an AP axis is important in locomotion – bilateral symmetry gives the body an intrinsic direction and allows streamlining to reduce drag.
In addition to animals, the flowers of some plants also show bilateral symmetry. Such plants are referred to as zygomorphic and include the orchid (Orchidaceae) and pea (Fabaceae) families, and most of the figwort family (Scrophulariaceae). The leaves of plants also commonly show approximate bilateral symmetry.
Biradial symmetry
Biradial symmetry is found in organisms which show morphological features (internal or external) of both bilateral and radial symmetry. Unlike radially symmetrical organisms which can be divided equally along many planes, biradial organisms can only be cut equally along two planes. This could represent an intermediate stage in the evolution of bilateral symmetry from a radially symmetric ancestor.
The animal group with the most obvious biradial symmetry is the ctenophores. In ctenophores the two planes of symmetry are (1) the plane of the tentacles and (2) the plane of the pharynx. In addition to this group, evidence for biradial symmetry has even been found in the 'perfectly radial' freshwater polyp Hydra (a cnidarian). Biradial symmetry, especially when considering both internal and external features, is more common than originally accounted for.
Evolution of symmetry
Like all the traits of organisms, symmetry (or indeed asymmetry) evolves due to an advantage to the organism – a process of natural selection. This involves changes in the frequency of symmetry-related genes throughout time.
Evolution of symmetry in plants
Early flowering plants had radially symmetric flowers but since then many plants have evolved bilaterally symmetrical flowers. The evolution of bilateral symmetry is due to the expression of CYCLOIDEA genes. Evidence for the role of the CYCLOIDEA gene family comes from mutations in these genes which cause a reversion to radial symmetry. The CYCLOIDEA genes encode transcription factors, proteins which control the expression of other genes. This allows their expression to influence developmental pathways relating to symmetry. For example, in Antirrhinum majus, CYCLOIDEA is expressed during early development in the dorsal domain of the flower meristem and continues to be expressed later on in the dorsal petals to control their size and shape. It is believed that the evolution of specialized pollinators may play a part in the transition of radially symmetrical flowers to bilaterally symmetrical flowers.
Evolution of symmetry in animals
Symmetry is often selected for in the evolution of animals. This is unsurprising since asymmetry is often an indication of unfitness – either defects during development or injuries throughout a lifetime. This is most apparent during mating during which females of some species select males with highly symmetrical features. Additionally, female barn swallows, a species where adults have long tail streamers, prefer to mate with males that have the most symmetrical tails.
While symmetry is known to be under selection, the evolutionary history of different types of symmetry in animals is an area of extensive debate. Traditionally it has been suggested that bilateral animals evolved from a radial ancestor. Cnidarians, a phylum containing animals with radial symmetry, are the most closely related group to the bilaterians. Cnidarians are one of two groups of early animals considered to have defined structure, the second being the ctenophores. Ctenophores show biradial symmetry leading to the suggestion that they represent an intermediate step in the evolution of bilateral symmetry from radial symmetry.
Interpretations based only on morphology are not sufficient to explain the evolution of symmetry. Two different explanations are proposed for the different symmetries in cnidarians and bilateria. The first suggestion is that an ancestral animal had no symmetry (was asymmetric) before cnidarians and bilaterians separated into different evolutionary lineages. Radial symmetry could have then evolved in cnidarians and bilateral symmetry in bilaterians. Alternatively, the second suggestion is that an ancestor of cnidarians and bilaterians had bilateral symmetry before the cnidarians evolved and became different by having radial symmetry. Both potential explanations are being explored and evidence continues to fuel the debate.
Asymmetry
Although asymmetry is typically associated with being unfit, some species have evolved to be asymmetrical as an important adaptation. Many members of the phylum Porifera (sponges) have no symmetry, though some are radially symmetric.
Group/Species | Asymmetrical Feature | Adaptive Benefit |
---|---|---|
Some owls | Size and positioning of ears | Allows the owl to more precisely determine the location of prey |
Flatfish | Both eyes on the same side of their head | Rest and swim on one side (to blend in with sand floor of the ocean) |
The scale-eating cichlid Perissodus microlepis | Mouth and jaw asymmetry | More effective at removing scales from their prey |
Humans | Handedness and internal asymmetry of organs e.g. left lung is smaller than the right | Handedness is an adaptation reflecting the asymmetries of the human brain. |
All vertebrates | Internal asymmetry of heart and bowels | Internal asymmetry is thought to be caused by a developmental axial twist. |
- Head of a male crossbill showing asymmetrical upper and lower beak
- A winter flounder, a type of flatfish, with both eyes on the same side of its head
- Hermit crabs have different sized claws
- A Roman snail and its helical shell
- Chicoreus palmarosae, a sea snail, illustrating asymmetry, which is seen in all gastropods in the form of a helical shell
- A red slug, clearly showing the pneumostome
- Male caribou usually possess one brow tine flattened into a shovel shape
- A life restoration of Stegosaurus stenops with its asymmetrical plates.
Symmetry breaking
The presence of these asymmetrical features requires a process of symmetry breaking during development, both in plants and animals. Symmetry breaking occurs at several different levels in order to generate the anatomical asymmetry which we observe. These levels include asymmetric gene expression, protein expression, and activity of cells.
For example, left–right asymmetry in mammals has been investigated extensively in the embryos of mice. Such studies have led to support for the nodal flow hypothesis. In a region of the embryo referred to as the node there are small hair-like structures (monocilia) that all rotate together in a particular direction. This creates a unidirectional flow of signalling molecules causing these signals to accumulate on one side of the embryo and not the other. This results in the activation of different developmental pathways on each side, and subsequent asymmetry.
Much of the investigation of the genetic basis of symmetry breaking has been done on chick embryos. In chick embryos the left side expresses genes called NODAL and LEFTY2 that activate PITX2 to signal the development of left side structures. Whereas, the right side does not express PITX2 and consequently develops right side structures. A more complete pathway is shown in the image at the side of the page.
For more information about symmetry breaking in animals please refer to the left–right asymmetry page.
Plants also show asymmetry. For example the direction of helical growth in Arabidopsis, the most commonly studied model plant, shows left-handedness. Interestingly, the genes involved in this asymmetry are similar (closely related) to those in animal asymmetry – both LEFTY1 and LEFTY2 play a role. In the same way as animals, symmetry breaking in plants can occur at a molecular (genes/proteins), subcellular, cellular, tissue and organ level.
Fluctuating asymmetry
Fluctuating asymmetry (FA), is a form of biological asymmetry, along with anti-symmetry and direction asymmetry. Fluctuating asymmetry refers to small, random deviations away from perfect bilateral symmetry. This deviation from perfection is thought to reflect the genetic and environmental pressures experienced throughout development, with greater pressures resulting in higher levels of asymmetry. Examples of FA in the human body include unequal sizes (asymmetry) of bilateral features in the face and body, such as left and right eyes, ears, wrists, breasts, testicles, and thighs.
Research has exposed multiple factors that are associated with FA. As measuring FA can indicate developmental stability, it can also suggest the genetic fitness of an individual. This can further have an effect on mate attraction and sexual selection, as less asymmetry reflects greater developmental stability and subsequent fitness. Human physical health is also associated with FA. For example, young men with greater FA report more medical conditions than those with lower levels of FA. Multiple other factors can be linked to FA, such as intelligence and personality traits.See also
Biological structures
- Standard anatomical position
- Anatomical terms of motion
- Anatomical terms of muscle
- Anatomical terms of bone
- Anatomical terms of neuroanatomy
- Glossary of botanical terms
- Glossary of plant morphology
- Glossary of leaf morphology
- Glossary of entomology terms
- Plant morphology
Terms of orientation
- Handedness
- Laterality
- Proper right and proper left
- Reflection symmetry
- Sinistral and dextral
- Direction (disambiguation)
- Symmetry (disambiguation)
References
Citations
- Holló, Gábor (2015). "A new paradigm for animal symmetry". Interface Focus. 5 (6): 20150032. doi:10.1098/rsfs.2015.0032. PMC 4633854. PMID 26640644.
- McBirney, Alexander (2009). Georges Cuvier. In: The Philosophy of Zoology Before Darwin. Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 87–98.
- Waggoner, Ben M. "Georges Cuvier (1769–1832)". UCMP Berkeley. Retrieved 8 March 2018.
Cuvier's insistence on the functional integration of organisms led him to classify animals into four "branches," or embranchements: Vertebrata, Articulata (arthropods and segmented worms), Mollusca (which at the time meant all other soft, bilaterally symmetrical invertebrates), and Radiata (cnidarians and echinoderms).
- Cuvier, Georges; Griffith, Edward; Pidgeon, Edward (1834). The Mollusca and Radiata: Arranged by the Baron Cuvier, with Supplementary Additions to Each Order. Whittaker and Company. pp. 435–.
- Waggoner, Ben M. "Georges Cuvier (1769–1832)". UCMP Berkeley. Retrieved 8 March 2018.
Cuvier's insistence on the functional integration of organisms led him to classify animals into four "branches," or embranchements: Vertebrata, Articulata (arthropods and segmented worms), Mollusca (which at the time meant all other soft, bilaterally symmetrical invertebrates), and Radiata (cnidarians and echinoderms).
- Hadzi, J. (1963). The Evolution of the Metazoa. Macmillan. pp. 56–57. ISBN 978-0-08-010079-1.
- Chandra, Girish (11 October 2008). "Symmetry". IAS. Retrieved 14 June 2014.
- Finnerty, J.R. (2003). "The origins of axial patterning in the metazoa: How old is bilateral symmetry?". The International Journal of Developmental Biology. 47 (7–8): 523–9. PMID 14756328. 14756328 16341006.
- Endress, P. K. (February 2001). "Evolution of Floral Symmetry". Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 4 (1): 86–91. Bibcode:2001COPB....4...86E. doi:10.1016/S1369-5266(00)00140-0. PMID 11163173.
- Stewart, 2001. pp 64–65.
- Alan J Cann (2015). "Virus Structure". eLS. American Cancer Society. pp. 1–9. doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0000439.pub2. ISBN 978-0-470-01590-2.
- Horne, R. W.; Wildy, P. (November 1961). "Symmetry in virus architecture". Virology. 15 (3): 348–373. doi:10.1016/0042-6822(61)90366-X. PMID 14448959.
- Young, K. D. (2006). "The Selective Value of Bacterial Shape". Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 70 (3): 660–703. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00001-06. PMC 1594593. PMID 16959965.
- Valentine, James W. "Bilateria". AccessScience. Archived from the original on 18 January 2008. Retrieved 29 May 2013.
- Finnerty, John R (2003). "Evolution & Development". IJDB. 47: 465–705.
- Freeman, Gary (2009). "The rise of bilaterians". Historical Biology. 21 (1–2): 99–114. Bibcode:2009HBio...21...99F. doi:10.1080/08912960903295843. S2CID 83841216.
- Finnerty, John R. (2005). "Did internal transport, rather than directed locomotion, favor the evolution of bilateral symmetry in animals?". BioEssays. 27 (11): 1174–1180. doi:10.1002/bies.20299. PMID 16237677.
- "SCROPHULARIACEAE – Figwort or Snapdragon Family". Texas A&M University Bioinformatics Working Group. Retrieved 14 June 2014.
- Symmetry, biological, from The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia (2007).
- Martindale, Mark Q.; Henry, Jonathan Q. (1998). "The Development of Radial and Biradial Symmetry: The Evolution of Bilaterality1". American Zoology. 38 (4): 672–684. doi:10.1093/icb/38.4.672.
- Watanabe, Hiroshi; Schmidt, Heiko A.; Kuhn, Anne; Höger, Stefanie K.; Kocagöz, Yigit; Laumann-Lipp, Nico; Özbek, Suat; Holstein, Thomas W. (24 August 2014). "Nodal signalling determines biradial asymmetry in Hydra". Nature. 515 (7525): 112–115. Bibcode:2014Natur.515..112W. doi:10.1038/nature13666. PMID 25156256. S2CID 4467701.
- Cubas, Pilar; Vincent, Coral; Coen, Enrico (1999). "An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry". Nature. 401 (6749): 157–161. Bibcode:1999Natur.401..157C. doi:10.1038/43657. PMID 10490023. S2CID 205033495.
- Citerne, H (2000). "Diversity of cycloidea-like Genes in Gesneriaceae in Relation to Floral Symmetry". Annals of Botany. 86 (1): 167–176. Bibcode:2000AnBot..86..167C. doi:10.1006/anbo.2000.1178.
- Hileman, Lena C; Cubas, Pilar (2009). "An expanded evolutionary role for flower symmetry genes". Journal of Biology. 8 (10): 90. doi:10.1186/jbiol193. PMC 2790833. PMID 19895716.
- Ivantsov, A. Yu.; Zakrevskaya, M. A. (2021). "Trilobozoa, Precambrian Tri-Radial Organisms". Paleontological Journal. 55 (7): 727–741. Bibcode:2021PalJ...55..727I. doi:10.1134/S0031030121070066. S2CID 245330736.
- Maynard Smith, John; Harper, David (2003). Animal Signals. Oxford University Press. pp. 63–65.
- Martindale, Mark Q.; Henry, Jonathon Q (1998). "The Development of Radial and Biradial Symmetry: The Evolution of Bilaterality". American Zoologist. 38 (4): 672–684. doi:10.1093/icb/38.4.672.
- Myers, Phil (2001). "Porifera Sponges". University of Michigan (Animal Diversity Web). Retrieved 14 June 2014.
- Norberg, R (1997). "Skull asymmetry, ear structure and function, and auditory localization in Tengmalm's owl, (Linné)". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences. 282: 325–410. doi:10.1098/rstb.1978.0014.
- Friedman, Matt (2008). "The evolutionary origin of flatfish asymmetry". Nature. 454 (7201): 209–212. Bibcode:2008Natur.454..209F. doi:10.1038/nature07108. PMID 18615083. S2CID 4311712.
- Lee, H. J.; Kusche, H.; Meyer, A. (2012). "Handed Foraging Behavior in Scale-Eating Cichlid Fish: Its Potential Role in Shaping Morphological Asymmetry". PLOS ONE. 7 (9): e44670. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...744670L. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044670. PMC 3435272. PMID 22970282.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Zaidel, E. (2001). "Brain Asymmetry". International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier. pp. 1321–1329. doi:10.1016/b0-08-043076-7/03548-8. ISBN 978-0-08-043076-8.
- Betts, J. Gordon (2013). Anatomy & physiology. OpenStax College, Rice University. pp. 787–846. ISBN 978-1-938168-13-0. Retrieved 11 August 2014.
- Holder, M. K. (1997). "Why are more people right-handed?". Scientific American. Retrieved 14 April 2008.
- de Lussanet, M. H. E.; Osse, J. W. M. (2012). "An ancestral axial twist explains the contralateral forebrain and the optic chiasm in vertebrates". Animal Biology. 62 (2): 193–216. arXiv:1003.1872. doi:10.1163/157075611X617102. S2CID 7399128.
- Goss, Richard J. (1 June 1990). "Interactions between asymmetric brow tines in caribou and reindeer antlers". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 68 (6): 1115–1119. Bibcode:1990CaJZ...68.1115G. doi:10.1139/z90-165. ISSN 0008-4301.
- Hirokawa, Nobutaka; Tanaka, Yosuke; Okada, Yasushi; Takeda, Sen (2006). "Nodal Flow and the Generation of Left-Right Asymmetry". Cell. 125 (1): 33–45. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.002. PMID 16615888. S2CID 18007532.
- Nonaka, Shigenori; Shiratori, Hidetaka; Saijoh, Yukio; Hamada, Hiroshi (2002). "Determination of left–right patterning of the mouse embryo by artificial nodal flow". Nature. 418 (6893): 96–99. Bibcode:2002Natur.418...96N. doi:10.1038/nature00849. PMID 12097914. S2CID 4373455.
- Raya, Angel; Izpisua Belmonte, Juan Carlos (2004). "Unveiling the establishment of left–right asymmetry in the chick embryo". Mechanisms of Development. 121 (9): 1043–1054. doi:10.1016/j.mod.2004.05.005. PMID 15296970. S2CID 15417027.
- Gros, J.; Feistel, K.; Viebahn, C.; Blum, M.; Tabin, C. J. (2009). "Cell Movements at Hensen's Node Establish Left/Right Asymmetric Gene Expression in the Chick". Science. 324 (5929): 941–944. Bibcode:2009Sci...324..941G. doi:10.1126/science.1172478. PMC 2993078. PMID 19359542.
- Muñoz-Nortes, Tamara; Wilson-Sánchez, David; Candela, Héctor; Micol, José Luis (2014). "Symmetry, asymmetry, and the cell cycle in plants: known knowns and some known unknowns". Journal of Experimental Botany. 65 (10): 2645–2655. doi:10.1093/jxb/ert476. PMID 24474806.
- Valen, Leigh Van (June 1962). "A Study of Fluctuating Asymmetry". Evolution. 16 (2): 125–142. doi:10.2307/2406192. JSTOR 2406192.
- Tomkins, J. L.; Kotiaho, J. S. (2001). Fluctuating Asymmetry. London: Macmillan Publishers Ltd. pp. 1–5.
- Thornhill, Gangestad, Randy, Steven W. (2008). The evolutionary biology of human female sexuality. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 162–168. ISBN 978-0195340983.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Milne, Barry J; Belsky, Jay; Poulton, Richie; Thomson, W. Murray; Caspi, Avshalom; Kieser, Jules (January 2003). "Fluctuating asymmetry and physical health among young adults". Evolution and Human Behavior. 24 (1): 53–63. Bibcode:2003EHumB..24...53M. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00120-4.
- Fink, Bernhard; Neave, Nick; Manning, John T.; Grammer, Karl (1 August 2005). "Facial symmetry and the 'big-five' personality factors". Personality and Individual Differences. 39 (3): 523–529. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.002.
Sources
- Ball, Philip (2009). Shapes. Oxford University Press.
- Stewart, Ian (2007). What Shape is a Snowflake? Magical Numbers in Nature. Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
- Thompson, D'Arcy (1942). On Growth and Form. Cambridge University Press.
- Haeckel, Ernst, E. (1904). Kunstformen der Natur. Available as Haeckel, E. (1998); Art forms in nature, Prestel US. ISBN 3-7913-1990-6.
Symmetry in biology refers to the symmetry observed in organisms including plants animals fungi and bacteria External symmetry can be easily seen by just looking at an organism For example the face of a human being has a plane of symmetry down its centre or a pine cone displays a clear symmetrical spiral pattern Internal features can also show symmetry for example the tubes in the human body responsible for transporting gases nutrients and waste products which are cylindrical and have several planes of symmetry A selection of animals showing a range of possible body symmetries including asymmetry radial and bilateral body plansIllustration depicting the difference between bilateral Drosophila radial actinomorphic flowers and spherical coccus bacteria symmetry Biological symmetry can be thought of as a balanced distribution of duplicate body parts or shapes within the body of an organism Importantly unlike in mathematics symmetry in biology is always approximate For example plant leaves while considered symmetrical rarely match up exactly when folded in half Symmetry is one class of patterns in nature whereby there is near repetition of the pattern element either by reflection or rotation While sponges and placozoans represent two groups of animals which do not show any symmetry i e are asymmetrical the body plans of most multicellular organisms exhibit and are defined by some form of symmetry There are only a few types of symmetry which are possible in body plans These are radial cylindrical symmetry bilateral biradial and spherical symmetry While the classification of viruses as an organism remains controversial viruses also contain icosahedral symmetry The importance of symmetry is illustrated by the fact that groups of animals have traditionally been defined by this feature in taxonomic groupings The Radiata animals with radial symmetry formed one of the four branches of Georges Cuvier s classification of the animal kingdom Meanwhile Bilateria is a taxonomic grouping still used today to represent organisms with embryonic bilateral symmetry Radial symmetryOrganisms with radial symmetry show a repeating pattern around a central axis such that they can be separated into several identical pieces when cut through the central point much like pieces of a pie Typically this involves repeating a body part 4 5 6 or 8 times around the axis referred to as tetramerism pentamerism hexamerism and octamerism respectively Such organisms exhibit no left or right sides but do have a top and a bottom surface or a front and a back George Cuvier classified animals with radial symmetry in the taxon Radiata Zoophytes which is now generally accepted to be an assemblage of different animal phyla that do not share a single common ancestor a polyphyletic group Most radially symmetric animals are symmetrical about an axis extending from the center of the oral surface which contains the mouth to the center of the opposite aboral end Animals in the phyla Cnidaria and Echinodermata generally show radial symmetry although many sea anemones and some corals within the Cnidaria have bilateral symmetry defined by a single structure the siphonoglyph Radial symmetry is especially suitable for sessile animals such as the sea anemone floating animals such as jellyfish and slow moving organisms such as starfish whereas bilateral symmetry favours locomotion by generating a streamlined body Many flowers are also radially symmetric or actinomorphic Roughly identical floral structures petals sepals and stamens occur at regular intervals around the axis of the flower which is often the female reproductive organ containing the carpel style and stigma Lilium bulbiferum displays hexamerism with repeated parts arranged around the axis of the flower Subtypes of radial symmetry Three fold triradial symmetry was present in Trilobozoa from the Late Ediacaran period Four fold tetramerism appears in some jellyfish such as Aurelia marginalis This is immediately obvious when looking at the jellyfish due to the presence of four gonads visible through its translucent body This radial symmetry is ecologically important in allowing the jellyfish to detect and respond to stimuli mainly food and danger from all directions Apple cut horizontally showing that pentamerism also occurs in fruit Flowering plants show five fold pentamerism in many of their flowers and fruits This is easily seen through the arrangement of five carpels seed pockets in an apple when cut transversely Among animals only the echinoderms such as sea stars sea urchins and sea lilies are pentamerous as adults with five arms arranged around the mouth Being bilaterian animals however they initially develop with mirror symmetry as larvae then gain pentaradial symmetry later Hexamerism is found in the corals and sea anemones class Anthozoa which are divided into two groups based on their symmetry The most common corals in the subclass Hexacorallia have a hexameric body plan their polyps have six fold internal symmetry and a number of tentacles that is a multiple of six Octamerism is found in corals of the subclass Octocorallia These have polyps with eight tentacles and octameric radial symmetry The octopus however has bilateral symmetry despite its eight arms Icosahedral symmetryGastroenteritis viruses have icosahedral symmetry Icosahedral symmetry occurs in an organism which contains 60 subunits generated by 20 faces each an equilateral triangle and 12 corners Within the icosahedron there is 2 fold 3 fold and 5 fold symmetry Many viruses including canine parvovirus show this form of symmetry due to the presence of an icosahedral viral shell Such symmetry has evolved because it allows the viral particle to be built up of repetitive subunits consisting of a limited number of structural proteins encoded by viral genes thereby saving space in the viral genome The icosahedral symmetry can still be maintained with more than 60 subunits but only in multiples of 60 For example the T 3 Tomato bushy stunt virus has 60x3 protein subunits 180 copies of the same structural protein Although these viruses are often referred to as spherical they do not show true mathematical spherical symmetry In the early 20th century Ernst Haeckel described Haeckel 1904 a number of species of Radiolaria some of whose skeletons are shaped like various regular polyhedra Examples include Circoporus octahedrus Circogonia icosahedra Lithocubus geometricus and Circorrhegma dodecahedra The shapes of these creatures should be obvious from their names Tetrahedral symmetry is not present in Callimitra agnesae Spherical symmetryVolvox is a microscopic green freshwater alga with spherical symmetry Young colonies can be seen inside the larger ones Spherical symmetry is characterised by the ability to draw an endless or great but finite number of symmetry axes through the body This means that spherical symmetry occurs in an organism if it is able to be cut into two identical halves through any cut that runs through the organism s center True spherical symmetry is not found in animal body plans Organisms which show approximate spherical symmetry include the freshwater green alga Volvox Bacteria are often referred to as having a spherical shape Bacteria are categorized based on their shapes into three classes cocci spherical shaped bacillus rod shaped and spirochetes spiral shaped cells In reality this is a severe over simplification as bacterial cells can be curved bent flattened oblong spheroids and many more shapes Due to the huge number of bacteria considered to be cocci coccus if a single cell it is unlikely that all of these show true spherical symmetry It is important to distinguish between the generalized use of the word spherical to describe organisms at ease and the true meaning of spherical symmetry The same situation is seen in the description of viruses spherical viruses do not necessarily show spherical symmetry being usually icosahedral Bilateral symmetryOrganisms with bilateral symmetry contain a single plane of symmetry the sagittal plane which divides the organism into two roughly mirror image left and right halves approximate reflectional symmetry The small emperor moth Saturnia pavonia displays a deimatic pattern with bilateral symmetry Flower of bee orchid Ophrys apifera is bilaterally symmetrical zygomorphic The lip of the flower resembles the bilaterally symmetric abdomen of a female bee pollination occurs when a male bee attempts to mate with it Animals with bilateral symmetry are classified into a large group called the bilateria which contains 99 of all animals comprising over 32 phyla and 1 million described species All bilaterians have some asymmetrical features for example the human heart and liver are positioned asymmetrically despite the body having external bilateral symmetry The bilateral symmetry of bilaterians is a complex trait which develops due to the expression of many genes The bilateria have two axes of polarity The first is an anterior posterior AP axis which can be visualised as an imaginary axis running from the head or mouth to the tail or other end of an organism The second is the dorsal ventral DV axis which runs perpendicular to the AP axis During development the AP axis is always specified before the DV axis which is known as the second embryonic axis The AP axis is essential in defining the polarity of bilateria and allowing the development of a front and back to give the organism direction The front end encounters the environment before the rest of the body so sensory organs such as eyes tend to be clustered there This is also the site where a mouth develops since it is the first part of the body to encounter food Therefore a distinct head with sense organs connected to a central nervous system tends to develop This pattern of development with a distinct head and tail is called cephalization It is also argued that the development of an AP axis is important in locomotion bilateral symmetry gives the body an intrinsic direction and allows streamlining to reduce drag In addition to animals the flowers of some plants also show bilateral symmetry Such plants are referred to as zygomorphic and include the orchid Orchidaceae and pea Fabaceae families and most of the figwort family Scrophulariaceae The leaves of plants also commonly show approximate bilateral symmetry Biradial symmetryBiradial symmetry is found in organisms which show morphological features internal or external of both bilateral and radial symmetry Unlike radially symmetrical organisms which can be divided equally along many planes biradial organisms can only be cut equally along two planes This could represent an intermediate stage in the evolution of bilateral symmetry from a radially symmetric ancestor The animal group with the most obvious biradial symmetry is the ctenophores In ctenophores the two planes of symmetry are 1 the plane of the tentacles and 2 the plane of the pharynx In addition to this group evidence for biradial symmetry has even been found in the perfectly radial freshwater polyp Hydra a cnidarian Biradial symmetry especially when considering both internal and external features is more common than originally accounted for Evolution of symmetryLike all the traits of organisms symmetry or indeed asymmetry evolves due to an advantage to the organism a process of natural selection This involves changes in the frequency of symmetry related genes throughout time Evolution of symmetry in plants Early flowering plants had radially symmetric flowers but since then many plants have evolved bilaterally symmetrical flowers The evolution of bilateral symmetry is due to the expression of CYCLOIDEA genes Evidence for the role of the CYCLOIDEA gene family comes from mutations in these genes which cause a reversion to radial symmetry The CYCLOIDEA genes encode transcription factors proteins which control the expression of other genes This allows their expression to influence developmental pathways relating to symmetry For example in Antirrhinum majus CYCLOIDEA is expressed during early development in the dorsal domain of the flower meristem and continues to be expressed later on in the dorsal petals to control their size and shape It is believed that the evolution of specialized pollinators may play a part in the transition of radially symmetrical flowers to bilaterally symmetrical flowers Evolution of symmetry in animals The Ediacaran phylum Trilobozoa possess a wide variety of body shapes mostly tri radial symmetry although their most famous member Tribrachidium possesses a triskelion body shape Symmetry is often selected for in the evolution of animals This is unsurprising since asymmetry is often an indication of unfitness either defects during development or injuries throughout a lifetime This is most apparent during mating during which females of some species select males with highly symmetrical features Additionally female barn swallows a species where adults have long tail streamers prefer to mate with males that have the most symmetrical tails While symmetry is known to be under selection the evolutionary history of different types of symmetry in animals is an area of extensive debate Traditionally it has been suggested that bilateral animals evolved from a radial ancestor Cnidarians a phylum containing animals with radial symmetry are the most closely related group to the bilaterians Cnidarians are one of two groups of early animals considered to have defined structure the second being the ctenophores Ctenophores show biradial symmetry leading to the suggestion that they represent an intermediate step in the evolution of bilateral symmetry from radial symmetry Interpretations based only on morphology are not sufficient to explain the evolution of symmetry Two different explanations are proposed for the different symmetries in cnidarians and bilateria The first suggestion is that an ancestral animal had no symmetry was asymmetric before cnidarians and bilaterians separated into different evolutionary lineages Radial symmetry could have then evolved in cnidarians and bilateral symmetry in bilaterians Alternatively the second suggestion is that an ancestor of cnidarians and bilaterians had bilateral symmetry before the cnidarians evolved and became different by having radial symmetry Both potential explanations are being explored and evidence continues to fuel the debate AsymmetryAlthough asymmetry is typically associated with being unfit some species have evolved to be asymmetrical as an important adaptation Many members of the phylum Porifera sponges have no symmetry though some are radially symmetric Group Species Asymmetrical Feature Adaptive BenefitSome owls Size and positioning of ears Allows the owl to more precisely determine the location of preyFlatfish Both eyes on the same side of their head Rest and swim on one side to blend in with sand floor of the ocean The scale eating cichlid Perissodus microlepis Mouth and jaw asymmetry More effective at removing scales from their preyHumans Handedness and internal asymmetry of organs e g left lung is smaller than the right Handedness is an adaptation reflecting the asymmetries of the human brain All vertebrates Internal asymmetry of heart and bowels Internal asymmetry is thought to be caused by a developmental axial twist Head of a male crossbill showing asymmetrical upper and lower beak A winter flounder a type of flatfish with both eyes on the same side of its head Hermit crabs have different sized claws A Roman snail and its helical shell Chicoreus palmarosae a sea snail illustrating asymmetry which is seen in all gastropods in the form of a helical shell A red slug clearly showing the pneumostome Male caribou usually possess one brow tine flattened into a shovel shape A life restoration of Stegosaurus stenops with its asymmetrical plates Symmetry breaking The presence of these asymmetrical features requires a process of symmetry breaking during development both in plants and animals Symmetry breaking occurs at several different levels in order to generate the anatomical asymmetry which we observe These levels include asymmetric gene expression protein expression and activity of cells For example left right asymmetry in mammals has been investigated extensively in the embryos of mice Such studies have led to support for the nodal flow hypothesis In a region of the embryo referred to as the node there are small hair like structures monocilia that all rotate together in a particular direction This creates a unidirectional flow of signalling molecules causing these signals to accumulate on one side of the embryo and not the other This results in the activation of different developmental pathways on each side and subsequent asymmetry Schematic diagram of signalling pathways on the left and right side of a chick embryo ultimately leading to the development of asymmetry Much of the investigation of the genetic basis of symmetry breaking has been done on chick embryos In chick embryos the left side expresses genes called NODAL and LEFTY2 that activate PITX2 to signal the development of left side structures Whereas the right side does not express PITX2 and consequently develops right side structures A more complete pathway is shown in the image at the side of the page For more information about symmetry breaking in animals please refer to the left right asymmetry page Plants also show asymmetry For example the direction of helical growth in Arabidopsis the most commonly studied model plant shows left handedness Interestingly the genes involved in this asymmetry are similar closely related to those in animal asymmetry both LEFTY1 and LEFTY2 play a role In the same way as animals symmetry breaking in plants can occur at a molecular genes proteins subcellular cellular tissue and organ level Fluctuating asymmetry This section is an excerpt from Fluctuating asymmetry edit Bilateral features in the face and body such as left and right eyes ears lips wrists and thighs often show some extent of fluctuating asymmetry Some individuals show greater asymmetry than others Fluctuating asymmetry FA is a form of biological asymmetry along with anti symmetry and direction asymmetry Fluctuating asymmetry refers to small random deviations away from perfect bilateral symmetry This deviation from perfection is thought to reflect the genetic and environmental pressures experienced throughout development with greater pressures resulting in higher levels of asymmetry Examples of FA in the human body include unequal sizes asymmetry of bilateral features in the face and body such as left and right eyes ears wrists breasts testicles and thighs Research has exposed multiple factors that are associated with FA As measuring FA can indicate developmental stability it can also suggest the genetic fitness of an individual This can further have an effect on mate attraction and sexual selection as less asymmetry reflects greater developmental stability and subsequent fitness Human physical health is also associated with FA For example young men with greater FA report more medical conditions than those with lower levels of FA Multiple other factors can be linked to FA such as intelligence and personality traits See alsoBiological structures Standard anatomical position Anatomical terms of motion Anatomical terms of muscle Anatomical terms of bone Anatomical terms of neuroanatomy Glossary of botanical terms Glossary of plant morphology Glossary of leaf morphology Glossary of entomology terms Plant morphologyTerms of orientation Handedness Laterality Proper right and proper left Reflection symmetry Sinistral and dextral Direction disambiguation Symmetry disambiguation ReferencesCitations Hollo Gabor 2015 A new paradigm for animal symmetry Interface Focus 5 6 20150032 doi 10 1098 rsfs 2015 0032 PMC 4633854 PMID 26640644 McBirney Alexander 2009 Georges Cuvier In The Philosophy of Zoology Before Darwin Springer Dordrecht pp 87 98 Waggoner Ben M Georges Cuvier 1769 1832 UCMP Berkeley Retrieved 8 March 2018 Cuvier s insistence on the functional integration of organisms led him to classify animals into four branches or embranchements Vertebrata Articulata arthropods and segmented worms Mollusca which at the time meant all other soft bilaterally symmetrical invertebrates and Radiata cnidarians and echinoderms Cuvier Georges Griffith Edward Pidgeon Edward 1834 The Mollusca and Radiata Arranged by the Baron Cuvier with Supplementary Additions to Each Order Whittaker and Company pp 435 Waggoner Ben M Georges Cuvier 1769 1832 UCMP Berkeley Retrieved 8 March 2018 Cuvier s insistence on the functional integration of organisms led him to classify animals into four branches or embranchements Vertebrata Articulata arthropods and segmented worms Mollusca which at the time meant all other soft bilaterally symmetrical invertebrates and Radiata cnidarians and echinoderms Hadzi J 1963 The Evolution of the Metazoa Macmillan pp 56 57 ISBN 978 0 08 010079 1 Chandra Girish 11 October 2008 Symmetry IAS Retrieved 14 June 2014 Finnerty J R 2003 The origins of axial patterning in the metazoa How old is bilateral symmetry The International Journal of Developmental Biology 47 7 8 523 9 PMID 14756328 14756328 16341006 Endress P K February 2001 Evolution of Floral Symmetry Current Opinion in Plant Biology 4 1 86 91 Bibcode 2001COPB 4 86E doi 10 1016 S1369 5266 00 00140 0 PMID 11163173 Stewart 2001 pp 64 65 Alan J Cann 2015 Virus Structure eLS American Cancer Society pp 1 9 doi 10 1002 9780470015902 a0000439 pub2 ISBN 978 0 470 01590 2 Horne R W Wildy P November 1961 Symmetry in virus architecture Virology 15 3 348 373 doi 10 1016 0042 6822 61 90366 X PMID 14448959 Young K D 2006 The Selective Value of Bacterial Shape Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 70 3 660 703 doi 10 1128 MMBR 00001 06 PMC 1594593 PMID 16959965 Valentine James W Bilateria AccessScience Archived from the original on 18 January 2008 Retrieved 29 May 2013 Finnerty John R 2003 Evolution amp Development IJDB 47 465 705 Freeman Gary 2009 The rise of bilaterians Historical Biology 21 1 2 99 114 Bibcode 2009HBio 21 99F doi 10 1080 08912960903295843 S2CID 83841216 Finnerty John R 2005 Did internal transport rather than directed locomotion favor the evolution of bilateral symmetry in animals BioEssays 27 11 1174 1180 doi 10 1002 bies 20299 PMID 16237677 SCROPHULARIACEAE Figwort or Snapdragon Family Texas A amp M University Bioinformatics Working Group Retrieved 14 June 2014 Symmetry biological from The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 2007 Martindale Mark Q Henry Jonathan Q 1998 The Development of Radial and Biradial Symmetry The Evolution of Bilaterality1 American Zoology 38 4 672 684 doi 10 1093 icb 38 4 672 Watanabe Hiroshi Schmidt Heiko A Kuhn Anne Hoger Stefanie K Kocagoz Yigit Laumann Lipp Nico Ozbek Suat Holstein Thomas W 24 August 2014 Nodal signalling determines biradial asymmetry in Hydra Nature 515 7525 112 115 Bibcode 2014Natur 515 112W doi 10 1038 nature13666 PMID 25156256 S2CID 4467701 Cubas Pilar Vincent Coral Coen Enrico 1999 An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry Nature 401 6749 157 161 Bibcode 1999Natur 401 157C doi 10 1038 43657 PMID 10490023 S2CID 205033495 Citerne H 2000 Diversity of cycloidea like Genes in Gesneriaceae in Relation to Floral Symmetry Annals of Botany 86 1 167 176 Bibcode 2000AnBot 86 167C doi 10 1006 anbo 2000 1178 Hileman Lena C Cubas Pilar 2009 An expanded evolutionary role for flower symmetry genes Journal of Biology 8 10 90 doi 10 1186 jbiol193 PMC 2790833 PMID 19895716 Ivantsov A Yu Zakrevskaya M A 2021 Trilobozoa Precambrian Tri Radial Organisms Paleontological Journal 55 7 727 741 Bibcode 2021PalJ 55 727I doi 10 1134 S0031030121070066 S2CID 245330736 Maynard Smith John Harper David 2003 Animal Signals Oxford University Press pp 63 65 Martindale Mark Q Henry Jonathon Q 1998 The Development of Radial and Biradial Symmetry The Evolution of Bilaterality American Zoologist 38 4 672 684 doi 10 1093 icb 38 4 672 Myers Phil 2001 Porifera Sponges University of Michigan Animal Diversity Web Retrieved 14 June 2014 Norberg R 1997 Skull asymmetry ear structure and function and auditory localization in Tengmalm s owl Linne Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences 282 325 410 doi 10 1098 rstb 1978 0014 Friedman Matt 2008 The evolutionary origin of flatfish asymmetry Nature 454 7201 209 212 Bibcode 2008Natur 454 209F doi 10 1038 nature07108 PMID 18615083 S2CID 4311712 Lee H J Kusche H Meyer A 2012 Handed Foraging Behavior in Scale Eating Cichlid Fish Its Potential Role in Shaping Morphological Asymmetry PLOS ONE 7 9 e44670 Bibcode 2012PLoSO 744670L doi 10 1371 journal pone 0044670 PMC 3435272 PMID 22970282 a href wiki Template Cite journal title Template Cite journal cite journal a CS1 maint multiple names authors list link Zaidel E 2001 Brain Asymmetry International Encyclopedia of the Social amp Behavioral Sciences Elsevier pp 1321 1329 doi 10 1016 b0 08 043076 7 03548 8 ISBN 978 0 08 043076 8 Betts J Gordon 2013 Anatomy amp physiology OpenStax College Rice University pp 787 846 ISBN 978 1 938168 13 0 Retrieved 11 August 2014 Holder M K 1997 Why are more people right handed Scientific American Retrieved 14 April 2008 de Lussanet M H E Osse J W M 2012 An ancestral axial twist explains the contralateral forebrain and the optic chiasm in vertebrates Animal Biology 62 2 193 216 arXiv 1003 1872 doi 10 1163 157075611X617102 S2CID 7399128 Goss Richard J 1 June 1990 Interactions between asymmetric brow tines in caribou and reindeer antlers Canadian Journal of Zoology 68 6 1115 1119 Bibcode 1990CaJZ 68 1115G doi 10 1139 z90 165 ISSN 0008 4301 Hirokawa Nobutaka Tanaka Yosuke Okada Yasushi Takeda Sen 2006 Nodal Flow and the Generation of Left Right Asymmetry Cell 125 1 33 45 doi 10 1016 j cell 2006 03 002 PMID 16615888 S2CID 18007532 Nonaka Shigenori Shiratori Hidetaka Saijoh Yukio Hamada Hiroshi 2002 Determination of left right patterning of the mouse embryo by artificial nodal flow Nature 418 6893 96 99 Bibcode 2002Natur 418 96N doi 10 1038 nature00849 PMID 12097914 S2CID 4373455 Raya Angel Izpisua Belmonte Juan Carlos 2004 Unveiling the establishment of left right asymmetry in the chick embryo Mechanisms of Development 121 9 1043 1054 doi 10 1016 j mod 2004 05 005 PMID 15296970 S2CID 15417027 Gros J Feistel K Viebahn C Blum M Tabin C J 2009 Cell Movements at Hensen s Node Establish Left Right Asymmetric Gene Expression in the Chick Science 324 5929 941 944 Bibcode 2009Sci 324 941G doi 10 1126 science 1172478 PMC 2993078 PMID 19359542 Munoz Nortes Tamara Wilson Sanchez David Candela Hector Micol Jose Luis 2014 Symmetry asymmetry and the cell cycle in plants known knowns and some known unknowns Journal of Experimental Botany 65 10 2645 2655 doi 10 1093 jxb ert476 PMID 24474806 Valen Leigh Van June 1962 A Study of Fluctuating Asymmetry Evolution 16 2 125 142 doi 10 2307 2406192 JSTOR 2406192 Tomkins J L Kotiaho J S 2001 Fluctuating Asymmetry London Macmillan Publishers Ltd pp 1 5 Thornhill Gangestad Randy Steven W 2008 The evolutionary biology of human female sexuality Oxford England Oxford University Press pp 162 168 ISBN 978 0195340983 a href wiki Template Cite book title Template Cite book cite book a CS1 maint multiple names authors list link Milne Barry J Belsky Jay Poulton Richie Thomson W Murray Caspi Avshalom Kieser Jules January 2003 Fluctuating asymmetry and physical health among young adults Evolution and Human Behavior 24 1 53 63 Bibcode 2003EHumB 24 53M doi 10 1016 S1090 5138 02 00120 4 Fink Bernhard Neave Nick Manning John T Grammer Karl 1 August 2005 Facial symmetry and the big five personality factors Personality and Individual Differences 39 3 523 529 doi 10 1016 j paid 2005 02 002 Sources Ball Philip 2009 Shapes Oxford University Press Stewart Ian 2007 What Shape is a Snowflake Magical Numbers in Nature Weidenfeld and Nicolson Thompson D Arcy 1942 On Growth and Form Cambridge University Press Haeckel Ernst E 1904 Kunstformen der Natur Available as Haeckel E 1998 Art forms in nature Prestel US ISBN 3 7913 1990 6