In physics and chemistry, a nucleon is either a proton or a neutron, considered in its role as a component of an atomic nucleus. The number of nucleons in a nucleus defines the atom's mass number (nucleon number).
Until the 1960s, nucleons were thought to be elementary particles, not made up of smaller parts. Now they are understood as composite particles, made of three quarks bound together by the strong interaction. The interaction between two or more nucleons is called internucleon interaction or nuclear force, which is also ultimately caused by the strong interaction. (Before the discovery of quarks, the term "strong interaction" referred to just internucleon interactions.)
Nucleons sit at the boundary where particle physics and nuclear physics overlap. Particle physics, particularly quantum chromodynamics, provides the fundamental equations that describe the properties of quarks and of the strong interaction. These equations describe quantitatively how quarks can bind together into protons and neutrons (and all the other hadrons). However, when multiple nucleons are assembled into an atomic nucleus (nuclide), these fundamental equations become too difficult to solve directly (see lattice QCD). Instead, nuclides are studied within nuclear physics, which studies nucleons and their interactions by approximations and models, such as the nuclear shell model. These models can successfully describe nuclide properties, as for example, whether or not a particular nuclide undergoes radioactive decay.
The proton and neutron are in a scheme of categories being at once fermions, hadrons and baryons. The proton carries a positive net charge, and the neutron carries a zero net charge; the proton's mass is only about 0.13% less than the neutron's. Thus, they can be viewed as two states of the same nucleon, and together form an isospin doublet (I = 1/2). In isospin space, neutrons can be transformed into protons and conversely by SU(2) symmetries. These nucleons are acted upon equally by the strong interaction, which is invariant under rotation in isospin space. According to Noether's theorem, isospin is conserved with respect to the strong interaction.: 129–130
Overview
Properties
Protons and neutrons are best known in their role as nucleons, i.e., as the components of atomic nuclei, but they also exist as free particles. Free neutrons are unstable, with a half-life of around 13 minutes, but they have important applications (see neutron radiation and neutron scattering). Protons not bound to other nucleons are the nuclei of hydrogen atoms when bound with an electron or – if not bound to anything – are ions or cosmic rays.
Both the proton and the neutron are composite particles, meaning that each is composed of smaller parts, namely three quarks each; although once thought to be so, neither is an elementary particle. A proton is composed of two up quarks and one down quark, while the neutron has one up quark and two down quarks. Quarks are held together by the strong force, or equivalently, by gluons, which mediate the strong force at the quark level.
An up quark has electric charge ++2/3 e, and a down quark has charge −+1/3 e, so the summed electric charges of proton and neutron are +e and 0, respectively. Thus, the neutron has a charge of 0 (zero), and therefore is electrically neutral; indeed, the term "neutron" comes from the fact that a neutron is electrically neutral.
The masses of the proton and neutron are similar: for the proton it is 1.6726×10−27 kg (938.27 MeV/c2), while for the neutron it is 1.6749×10−27 kg (939.57 MeV/c2); the neutron is roughly 0.13% heavier. The similarity in mass can be explained roughly by the slight difference in masses of up quarks and down quarks composing the nucleons. However, a detailed description remains an unsolved problem in particle physics.: 135–136
The spin of the nucleon is 1/2, which means that they are fermions and, like electrons, are subject to the Pauli exclusion principle: no more than one nucleon, e.g. in an atomic nucleus, may occupy the same quantum state.
The isospin and spin quantum numbers of the nucleon have two states each, resulting in four combinations in total. An alpha particle is composed of four nucleons occupying all four combinations, namely, it has two protons (having opposite spin) and two neutrons (also having opposite spin), and its net nuclear spin is zero. In larger nuclei constituent nucleons, by Pauli exclusion, are compelled to have relative motion, which may also contribute to nuclear spin via the orbital quantum number. They spread out into nuclear shells analogous to electron shells known from chemistry.
Both the proton and neutron have magnetic moments, though the nucleon magnetic moments are anomalous and were unexpected when they were discovered in the 1930s. The proton's magnetic moment, symbol μp, is 2.79 μN, whereas, if the proton were an elementary Dirac particle, it should have a magnetic moment of 1.0 μN. Here the unit for the magnetic moments is the nuclear magneton, symbol μN, an atomic-scale unit of measure. The neutron's magnetic moment is μn = −1.91 μN, whereas, since the neutron lacks an electric charge, it should have no magnetic moment. The value of the neutron's magnetic moment is negative because the direction of the moment is opposite to the neutron's spin. The nucleon magnetic moments arise from the quark substructure of the nucleons. The proton magnetic moment is exploited for NMR / MRI scanning.
Stability
A neutron in free state is an unstable particle, with a half-life around ten minutes. It undergoes
β−
decay (a type of radioactive decay) by turning into a proton while emitting an electron and an electron antineutrino. This reaction can occur because the mass of the neutron is slightly greater than that of the proton. (See the Neutron article for more discussion of neutron decay.) A proton by itself is thought to be stable, or at least its lifetime is too long to measure. This is an important discussion in particle physics (see Proton decay).
Inside a nucleus, on the other hand, combined protons and neutrons (nucleons) can be stable or unstable depending on the nuclide, or nuclear species. Inside some nuclides, a neutron can turn into a proton (producing other particles) as described above; the reverse can happen inside other nuclides, where a proton turns into a neutron (producing other particles) through
β+
decay or electron capture. And inside still other nuclides, both protons and neutrons are stable and do not change form.
Antinucleons
Both nucleons have corresponding antiparticles: the antiproton and the antineutron, which have the same mass and opposite charge as the proton and neutron respectively, and they interact in the same way. (This is generally believed to be exactly true, due to CPT symmetry. If there is a difference, it is too small to measure in all experiments to date.) In particular, antinucleons can bind into an "antinucleus". So far, scientists have created antideuterium and antihelium-3 nuclei.
Tables of detailed properties
Nucleons
Particle name | Symbol | Quark content | Mass[a] | I3 | JP | Q | Magnetic moment (μN) | Mean lifetime | Commonly decays to |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
proton | p / p+ / N+ | u u d | 938.272013(23) MeV/c2 1.00727646677(10) Da | +1/2 | 1/2+ | +1 e | 2.792847356(23) | stable[b] | unobserved |
neutron | n / n0 / N0 | u d d | 939.565346(23) MeV/c2 1.00866491597(43) Da | −+1/2 | 1/2+ | 0 e | −1.91304273(45) | 885.7(8) s[c] | p + e− + ν e |
antiproton | p / p− / N− | u u d | 938.272013(23) MeV/c2 1.00727646677(10) Da | −+1/2 | 1/2+ | −1 e | −2.793(6) | stable[b] | unobserved |
antineutron | n / n0 / N0 | u d d | 939.485(51) MeV/c2 1.00866491597(43) Da | ++1/2 | 1/2+ | 0 e | ? | 885.7(8) s[c] | p + e+ + ν e |
^a The masses of the proton and neutron are known with far greater precision in daltons (Da) than in MeV/c2 due to the way in which these are defined. The conversion factor used is 1 Da = 931.494028(23) MeV/c2.
^b At least 1035 years. See proton decay.
^c For free neutrons; in most common nuclei, neutrons are stable.
The masses of their antiparticles are assumed to be identical, and no experiments have refuted this to date. Current experiments show any relative difference between the masses of the proton and antiproton must be less than 2×10−9 and the difference between the neutron and antineutron masses is on the order of (9±6)×10−5 MeV/c2.
Test | Formula | PDG result |
---|---|---|
Mass | <2×10−9 | |
Charge-to-mass ratio | 0.99999999991(9) | |
Charge-to-mass-to-mass ratio | (−9±9)×10−11 | |
Charge | <2×10−9 | |
Electron charge | <1×10−21 | |
Magnetic moment | (−0.1±2.1)×10−3 |
Nucleon resonances
Nucleon resonances are excited states of nucleon particles, often corresponding to one of the quarks having a flipped spin state, or with different orbital angular momentum when the particle decays. Only resonances with a 3- or 4-star rating at the Particle Data Group (PDG) are included in this table. Due to their extraordinarily short lifetimes, many properties of these particles are still under investigation.
The symbol format is given as N(m) LIJ, where m is the particle's approximate mass, L is the orbital angular momentum (in the spectroscopic notation) of the nucleon–meson pair, produced when it decays, and I and J are the particle's isospin and total angular momentum respectively. Since nucleons are defined as having 1/2 isospin, the first number will always be 1, and the second number will always be odd. When discussing nucleon resonances, sometimes the N is omitted and the order is reversed, in the form LIJ (m); for example, a proton can be denoted as "N(939) S11" or "S11 (939)".
The table below lists only the base resonance; each individual entry represents 4 baryons: 2 nucleon resonances particles and their 2 antiparticles. Each resonance exists in a form with a positive electric charge (Q), with a quark composition of
u
u
d
like the proton, and a neutral form, with a quark composition of
u
d
d
like the neutron, as well as the corresponding antiparticles with antiquark compositions of
u
u
d
and
u
d
d
respectively. Since they contain no strange, charm, bottom, or top quarks, these particles do not possess strangeness, etc.
The table only lists the resonances with an isospin = 1/2. For resonances with isospin = 3/2, see the article on Delta baryons.
Symbol | JP | PDG mass average (MeV/c2) | Full width (MeV/c2) | Pole position (real part) | Pole position (−2 × imaginary part) | Common decays (Γi/Γ > 50%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N(939) P11 † | 1/2+ | 939 | † | † | † | † |
N(1440) P11 (the Roper resonance) | 1/2+ | 1440 (1420–1470) | 300 (200–450) | 1365 (1350–1380) | 190 (160–220) | N + π |
N(1520) D13 | 3/2− | 1520 (1515–1525) | 115 (100–125) | 1510 (1505–1515) | 110 (105–120) | N + π |
N(1535) S11 | 1/2− | 1535 (1525–1545) | 150 (125–175) | 1510 (1490–1530) | 170 (90–250) | N + π or N + η |
N(1650) S11 | 1/2− | 1650 (1645–1670) | 165 (145–185) | 1665 (1640–1670) | 165 (150–180) | N + π |
N(1675) D15 | 5/2− | 1675 (1670–1680) | 150 (135–165) | 1660 (1655–1665) | 135 (125–150) | N + π + π or Δ + π |
N(1680) F15 | 5/2+ | 1685 (1680–1690) | 130 (120–140) | 1675 (1665–1680) | 120 (110–135) | N + π |
N(1700) D13 | 3/2− | 1700 (1650–1750) | 100 (50–150) | 1680 (1630–1730) | 100 (50–150) | N + π + π |
N(1710) P11 | 1/2+ | 1710 (1680–1740) | 100 (50–250) | 1720 (1670–1770) | 230 (80–380) | N + π + π |
N(1720) P13 | 3/2+ | 1720 (1700–1750) | 200 (150–300) | 1675 (1660–1690) | 115–275 | N + π + π or N + ρ |
N(2190) G17 | 7/2− | 2190 (2100–2200) | 500 (300–700) | 2075 (2050–2100) | 450 (400–520) | N + π (10—20%) |
N(2220) H19 | 9/2+ | 2250 (2200–2300) | 400 (350–500) | 2170 (2130–2200) | 480 (400–560) | N + π (10—20%) |
N(2250) G19 | 9/2− | 2250 (2200–2350) | 500 (230–800) | 2200 (2150–2250) | 450 (350–550) | N + π (5—15%) |
† The P11(939) nucleon represents the excited state of a normal proton or neutron. Such a particle may be stable when in an atomic nucleus, e.g. in lithium-6.
Quark model classification
In the quark model with SU(2) flavour, the two nucleons are part of the ground-state doublet. The proton has quark content of uud, and the neutron, udd. In SU(3) flavour, they are part of the ground-state octet (8) of spin-1/2 baryons, known as the Eightfold way. The other members of this octet are the hyperons strange isotriplet
Σ+
,
Σ0
,
Σ−
, the
Λ
and the strange isodoublet
Ξ0
,
Ξ−
. One can extend this multiplet in SU(4) flavour (with the inclusion of the charm quark) to the ground-state 20-plet, or to SU(6) flavour (with the inclusion of the top and bottom quarks) to the ground-state 56-plet.
The article on isospin provides an explicit expression for the nucleon wave functions in terms of the quark flavour eigenstates.
Models
This section may be confusing or unclear to readers.(August 2007) |
Although it is known that the nucleon is made from three quarks, as of 2006[update], it is not known how to solve the equations of motion for quantum chromodynamics. Thus, the study of the low-energy properties of the nucleon are performed by means of models. The only first-principles approach available is to attempt to solve the equations of QCD numerically, using lattice QCD. This requires complicated algorithms and very powerful supercomputers. However, several analytic models also exist:
Skyrmion models
The skyrmion models the nucleon as a topological soliton in a nonlinear SU(2) pion field. The topological stability of the skyrmion is interpreted as the conservation of baryon number, that is, the non-decay of the nucleon. The local topological winding number density is identified with the local baryon number density of the nucleon. With the pion isospin vector field oriented in the shape of a hedgehog space, the model is readily solvable, and is thus sometimes called the hedgehog model. The hedgehog model is able to predict low-energy parameters, such as the nucleon mass, radius and , to approximately 30% of experimental values.
MIT bag model
The MIT bag model confines quarks and gluons interacting through quantum chromodynamics to a region of space determined by balancing the pressure exerted by the quarks and gluons against a hypothetical pressure exerted by the vacuum on all colored quantum fields. The simplest approximation to the model confines three non-interacting quarks to a spherical cavity, with the boundary condition that the quark vector current vanish on the boundary. The non-interacting treatment of the quarks is justified by appealing to the idea of asymptotic freedom, whereas the hard-boundary condition is justified by quark confinement.
Mathematically, the model vaguely resembles that of a radar cavity, with solutions to the Dirac equation standing in for solutions to the Maxwell equations, and the vanishing vector current boundary condition standing for the conducting metal walls of the radar cavity. If the radius of the bag is set to the radius of the nucleon, the bag model predicts a nucleon mass that is within 30% of the actual mass.
Although the basic bag model does not provide a pion-mediated interaction, it describes excellently the nucleon–nucleon forces through the 6 quark bag s-channel mechanism using the P-matrix.
Chiral bag model
The chiral bag model merges the MIT bag model and the skyrmion model. In this model, a hole is punched out of the middle of the skyrmion and replaced with a bag model. The boundary condition is provided by the requirement of continuity of the axial vector current across the bag boundary.
Very curiously, the missing part of the topological winding number (the baryon number) of the hole punched into the skyrmion is exactly made up by the non-zero vacuum expectation value (or spectral asymmetry) of the quark fields inside the bag. As of 2017[update], this remarkable trade-off between topology and the spectrum of an operator does not have any grounding or explanation in the mathematical theory of Hilbert spaces and their relationship to geometry.
Several other properties of the chiral bag are notable: It provides a better fit to the low-energy nucleon properties, to within 5–10%, and these are almost completely independent of the chiral-bag radius, as long as the radius is less than the nucleon radius. This independence of radius is referred to as the Cheshire Cat principle, after the fading of Lewis Carroll's Cheshire Cat to just its smile. It is expected that a first-principles solution of the equations of QCD will demonstrate a similar duality of quark–meson descriptions.
See also
- SLAC bag model
- Hadrons
- Electroweak interaction
Footnotes
- The resultant coefficients are obtained by summation of the component charges: ΣQ = 2/3 + 2/3 + (−+1/3) = 3/3 = +1 for proton, and ΣQ = 2/3 + (−+1/3) + (−+1/3) = 0/3 = 0 for neutron.
References
- Griffiths, David J. (2008). Introduction to Elementary Particles (2nd revised ed.). WILEY-VCH. ISBN 978-3-527-40601-2.
- Perkins, Donald H. (1982). Introduction to High Energy Physics. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley. pp. 201–202. ISBN 978-0-201-05757-7.
- Kincade, Kathy (2 February 2015). "Pinpointing the magnetic moments of nuclear matter". Phys.org. Archived from the original on 2 May 2015. Retrieved May 8, 2015.
- Massam, T; Muller, Th.; Righini, B.; Schneegans, M.; Zichichi, A. (1965). "Experimental observation of antideuteron production". Il Nuovo Cimento. 39 (1): 10–14. Bibcode:1965NCimS..39...10M. doi:10.1007/BF02814251. S2CID 122952224.
- Dorfan, D. E; Eades, J.; Lederman, L. M.; Lee, W.; Ting, C. C. (June 1965). "Observation of Antideuterons". Phys. Rev. Lett. 14 (24): 1003–1006. Bibcode:1965PhRvL..14.1003D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.1003.
- R. Arsenescu; et al. (2003). "Antihelium-3 production in lead-lead collisions at 158 A GeV/c". New Journal of Physics. 5 (1): 1. Bibcode:2003NJPh....5....1A. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/5/1/301.
- "Lithium-6. Compound summary". PubChem. National Library of Medicine. Archived from the original on 2021-11-19. Retrieved 2021-04-08.
- Chodos et al. "New extended model of hadrons" Archived 2023-12-30 at the Wayback Machine, Phys. Rev. D 9, 3471 (1974).
- Chodos et al. "Baryon structure in the bag theory" Archived 2023-12-30 at the Wayback Machine, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2599 (1974).
- DeGrand et al. "Masses and other parameters of the light hadrons" Archived 2023-12-30 at the Wayback Machine, Phys. Rev. D 12, 2060 (1975).
- Jaffe, R. L.; Low, F. E. (1979). "Connection between quark-model eigenstates and low-energy scattering". Phys. Rev. D. 19 (7): 2105. Bibcode:1979PhRvD..19.2105J. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.19.2105.
- Yu; Simonov, A. (1981). "The quark compound bag model and the Jaffe-Low P-matrix". Physics Letters B. 107 (1–2): 1. Bibcode:1981PhLB..107....1S. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)91133-3.
- Brown, Gerald E.; Rho, Mannque (March 1979). "The little bag". Physics Letters B. 82 (2): 177–180. Bibcode:1979PhLB...82..177B. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(79)90729-9.
- Vepstas, L.; Jackson, A. D.; Goldhaber, A. S. (1984). "Two-phase models of baryons and the chiral Casimir effect". Physics Letters B. 140 (5–6): 280–284. Bibcode:1984PhLB..140..280V. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(84)90753-6.
- Vepstas, L.; Jackson, A. D. (1990). "Justifying the chiral bag". Physics Reports. 187 (3): 109–143. Bibcode:1990PhR...187..109V. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(90)90056-8.
Particle listings
- Particle listings –
p
Archived 2017-01-27 at the Wayback Machine. - Particle listings –
n
Archived 2018-10-03 at the Wayback Machine. - Particle listings — Note on N and Delta Resonances Archived 2021-03-27 at the Wayback Machine.
- Particle listings — N(1440) Archived 2021-03-30 at the Wayback Machine.
- Particle listings — N(1520) Archived 2021-03-29 at the Wayback Machine.
- Particle listings — N(1535) Archived 2021-03-29 at the Wayback Machine.
- Particle listings — N(1650) Archived 2021-03-30 at the Wayback Machine.
- Particle listings — N(1675) Archived 2021-03-28 at the Wayback Machine.
- Particle listings — N(1680) Archived 2021-03-29 at the Wayback Machine.
- Particle listings — N(1700) Archived 2021-03-28 at the Wayback Machine.
- Particle listings — N(1710) Archived 2021-03-28 at the Wayback Machine.
- Particle listings — N(1720) Archived 2021-03-30 at the Wayback Machine.
- Particle listings — N(2190) Archived 2021-03-29 at the Wayback Machine.
- Particle listings — N(2220) Archived 2021-03-29 at the Wayback Machine.
- Particle listings — N(2250) Archived 2021-03-29 at the Wayback Machine.
Further reading
- Thomas, A. W.; Weise, W. (2001). The Structure of the Nucleon. Berlin, DE: Wiley-WCH. ISBN 3-527-40297-7.
- Brown, G .E.; Jackson, A. D. (1976). The Nucleon–Nucleon Interaction. North-Holland Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7204-0335-0.
- Nakamura, N.; Particle Data Group; et al. (2011). "Review of Particle Physics". Journal of Physics G. 37 (7): 075021. Bibcode:2010JPhG...37g5021N. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/37/7A/075021. hdl:10481/34593.
In physics and chemistry a nucleon is either a proton or a neutron considered in its role as a component of an atomic nucleus The number of nucleons in a nucleus defines the atom s mass number nucleon number An atomic nucleus is shown here as a compact bundle of the two types of nucleons protons red and neutrons blue In this picture the protons and neutrons are shown as distinct which is the conventional view in chemistry for example But in an actual nucleus as understood by modern nuclear physics the nucleons are partially delocalized and organize themselves according to the laws of quantum chromodynamics Until the 1960s nucleons were thought to be elementary particles not made up of smaller parts Now they are understood as composite particles made of three quarks bound together by the strong interaction The interaction between two or more nucleons is called internucleon interaction or nuclear force which is also ultimately caused by the strong interaction Before the discovery of quarks the term strong interaction referred to just internucleon interactions Nucleons sit at the boundary where particle physics and nuclear physics overlap Particle physics particularly quantum chromodynamics provides the fundamental equations that describe the properties of quarks and of the strong interaction These equations describe quantitatively how quarks can bind together into protons and neutrons and all the other hadrons However when multiple nucleons are assembled into an atomic nucleus nuclide these fundamental equations become too difficult to solve directly see lattice QCD Instead nuclides are studied within nuclear physics which studies nucleons and their interactions by approximations and models such as the nuclear shell model These models can successfully describe nuclide properties as for example whether or not a particular nuclide undergoes radioactive decay The proton and neutron are in a scheme of categories being at once fermions hadrons and baryons The proton carries a positive net charge and the neutron carries a zero net charge the proton s mass is only about 0 13 less than the neutron s Thus they can be viewed as two states of the same nucleon and together form an isospin doublet I 1 2 In isospin space neutrons can be transformed into protons and conversely by SU 2 symmetries These nucleons are acted upon equally by the strong interaction which is invariant under rotation in isospin space According to Noether s theorem isospin is conserved with respect to the strong interaction 129 130 OverviewProperties Quark composition of a nucleonProton p u u dNeutron n u d dAntiproton p u u dAntineutron n u d dA proton p is composed of two up quarks u and one down quark d uud A neutron n has one up quark u and two down quarks d udd An antiproton p has two up antiquarks u and one down antiquark d u u d An antineutron n has one up antiquark u and two down antiquarks d u d d The color charge color assignment of individual quarks is arbitrary but all three colors red green blue must be present Protons and neutrons are best known in their role as nucleons i e as the components of atomic nuclei but they also exist as free particles Free neutrons are unstable with a half life of around 13 minutes but they have important applications see neutron radiation and neutron scattering Protons not bound to other nucleons are the nuclei of hydrogen atoms when bound with an electron or if not bound to anything are ions or cosmic rays Both the proton and the neutron are composite particles meaning that each is composed of smaller parts namely three quarks each although once thought to be so neither is an elementary particle A proton is composed of two up quarks and one down quark while the neutron has one up quark and two down quarks Quarks are held together by the strong force or equivalently by gluons which mediate the strong force at the quark level An up quark has electric charge 2 3 e and a down quark has charge 1 3 e so the summed electric charges of proton and neutron are e and 0 respectively Thus the neutron has a charge of 0 zero and therefore is electrically neutral indeed the term neutron comes from the fact that a neutron is electrically neutral The masses of the proton and neutron are similar for the proton it is 1 6726 10 27 kg 938 27 MeV c2 while for the neutron it is 1 6749 10 27 kg 939 57 MeV c2 the neutron is roughly 0 13 heavier The similarity in mass can be explained roughly by the slight difference in masses of up quarks and down quarks composing the nucleons However a detailed description remains an unsolved problem in particle physics 135 136 The spin of the nucleon is 1 2 which means that they are fermions and like electrons are subject to the Pauli exclusion principle no more than one nucleon e g in an atomic nucleus may occupy the same quantum state The isospin and spin quantum numbers of the nucleon have two states each resulting in four combinations in total An alpha particle is composed of four nucleons occupying all four combinations namely it has two protons having opposite spin and two neutrons also having opposite spin and its net nuclear spin is zero In larger nuclei constituent nucleons by Pauli exclusion are compelled to have relative motion which may also contribute to nuclear spin via the orbital quantum number They spread out into nuclear shells analogous to electron shells known from chemistry Both the proton and neutron have magnetic moments though the nucleon magnetic moments are anomalous and were unexpected when they were discovered in the 1930s The proton s magnetic moment symbol mp is 2 79 mN whereas if the proton were an elementary Dirac particle it should have a magnetic moment of 1 0 mN Here the unit for the magnetic moments is the nuclear magneton symbol mN an atomic scale unit of measure The neutron s magnetic moment is mn 1 91 mN whereas since the neutron lacks an electric charge it should have no magnetic moment The value of the neutron s magnetic moment is negative because the direction of the moment is opposite to the neutron s spin The nucleon magnetic moments arise from the quark substructure of the nucleons The proton magnetic moment is exploited for NMR MRI scanning Stability A neutron in free state is an unstable particle with a half life around ten minutes It undergoes b decay a type of radioactive decay by turning into a proton while emitting an electron and an electron antineutrino This reaction can occur because the mass of the neutron is slightly greater than that of the proton See the Neutron article for more discussion of neutron decay A proton by itself is thought to be stable or at least its lifetime is too long to measure This is an important discussion in particle physics see Proton decay Inside a nucleus on the other hand combined protons and neutrons nucleons can be stable or unstable depending on the nuclide or nuclear species Inside some nuclides a neutron can turn into a proton producing other particles as described above the reverse can happen inside other nuclides where a proton turns into a neutron producing other particles through b decay or electron capture And inside still other nuclides both protons and neutrons are stable and do not change form Antinucleons Both nucleons have corresponding antiparticles the antiproton and the antineutron which have the same mass and opposite charge as the proton and neutron respectively and they interact in the same way This is generally believed to be exactly true due to CPT symmetry If there is a difference it is too small to measure in all experiments to date In particular antinucleons can bind into an antinucleus So far scientists have created antideuterium and antihelium 3 nuclei Tables of detailed propertiesNucleons Nucleons I 1 2 S C B 0 Particle name Symbol Quark content Mass a I3 JP Q Magnetic moment mN Mean lifetime Commonly decays toproton p p N u u d 938 272013 23 MeV c2 1 007276 466 77 10 Da 1 2 1 2 1 e 2 792847 356 23 stable b unobservedneutron n n0 N0 u d d 939 565346 23 MeV c2 1 008664 915 97 43 Da 1 2 1 2 0 e 1 913042 73 45 885 7 8 s c p e n eantiproton p p N u u d 938 272013 23 MeV c2 1 007276 466 77 10 Da 1 2 1 2 1 e 2 793 6 stable b unobservedantineutron n n 0 N 0 u d d 939 485 51 MeV c2 1 008664 915 97 43 Da 1 2 1 2 0 e 885 7 8 s c p e ne a The masses of the proton and neutron are known with far greater precision in daltons Da than in MeV c2 due to the way in which these are defined The conversion factor used is 1 Da 931 494028 23 MeV c2 b At least 1035 years See proton decay c For free neutrons in most common nuclei neutrons are stable The masses of their antiparticles are assumed to be identical and no experiments have refuted this to date Current experiments show any relative difference between the masses of the proton and antiproton must be less than 2 10 9 and the difference between the neutron and antineutron masses is on the order of 9 6 10 5 MeV c2 Proton antiproton CPT invariance tests Test Formula PDG resultMass mp mp mp displaystyle frac m rm p m bar rm p m rm p lt 2 10 9Charge to mass ratio qp mp qpmp displaystyle frac left frac q bar rm p m bar rm p right left frac q rm p m rm p right 0 999999 999 91 9 Charge to mass to mass ratio qp mp qpmpqpmp displaystyle frac left frac q bar rm p m bar rm p right frac q rm p m rm p frac q rm p m rm p 9 9 10 11Charge qp qp e displaystyle frac left q rm p q bar rm p right e lt 2 10 9Electron charge qp qe e displaystyle frac left q rm p q rm e right e lt 1 10 21Magnetic moment mp mp mp displaystyle frac left mu rm p mu bar p right mu rm p 0 1 2 1 10 3Nucleon resonances Nucleon resonances are excited states of nucleon particles often corresponding to one of the quarks having a flipped spin state or with different orbital angular momentum when the particle decays Only resonances with a 3 or 4 star rating at the Particle Data Group PDG are included in this table Due to their extraordinarily short lifetimes many properties of these particles are still under investigation The symbol format is given as N m LIJ where m is the particle s approximate mass L is the orbital angular momentum in the spectroscopic notation of the nucleon meson pair produced when it decays and I and J are the particle s isospin and total angular momentum respectively Since nucleons are defined as having 1 2 isospin the first number will always be 1 and the second number will always be odd When discussing nucleon resonances sometimes the N is omitted and the order is reversed in the form LIJ m for example a proton can be denoted as N 939 S11 or S11 939 The table below lists only the base resonance each individual entry represents 4 baryons 2 nucleon resonances particles and their 2 antiparticles Each resonance exists in a form with a positive electric charge Q with a quark composition of u u d like the proton and a neutral form with a quark composition of u d d like the neutron as well as the corresponding antiparticles with antiquark compositions of u u d and u d d respectively Since they contain no strange charm bottom or top quarks these particles do not possess strangeness etc The table only lists the resonances with an isospin 1 2 For resonances with isospin 3 2 see the article on Delta baryons Nucleon resonances with I 1 2 Symbol JP PDG mass average MeV c2 Full width MeV c2 Pole position real part Pole position 2 imaginary part Common decays Gi G gt 50 N 939 P11 1 2 939 N 1440 P11 the Roper resonance 1 2 1440 1420 1470 300 200 450 1365 1350 1380 190 160 220 N pN 1520 D13 3 2 1520 1515 1525 115 100 125 1510 1505 1515 110 105 120 N pN 1535 S11 1 2 1535 1525 1545 150 125 175 1510 1490 1530 170 90 250 N p or N hN 1650 S11 1 2 1650 1645 1670 165 145 185 1665 1640 1670 165 150 180 N pN 1675 D15 5 2 1675 1670 1680 150 135 165 1660 1655 1665 135 125 150 N p p or D pN 1680 F15 5 2 1685 1680 1690 130 120 140 1675 1665 1680 120 110 135 N pN 1700 D13 3 2 1700 1650 1750 100 50 150 1680 1630 1730 100 50 150 N p pN 1710 P11 1 2 1710 1680 1740 100 50 250 1720 1670 1770 230 80 380 N p pN 1720 P13 3 2 1720 1700 1750 200 150 300 1675 1660 1690 115 275 N p p or N rN 2190 G17 7 2 2190 2100 2200 500 300 700 2075 2050 2100 450 400 520 N p 10 20 N 2220 H19 9 2 2250 2200 2300 400 350 500 2170 2130 2200 480 400 560 N p 10 20 N 2250 G19 9 2 2250 2200 2350 500 230 800 2200 2150 2250 450 350 550 N p 5 15 The P11 939 nucleon represents the excited state of a normal proton or neutron Such a particle may be stable when in an atomic nucleus e g in lithium 6 Quark model classificationIn the quark model with SU 2 flavour the two nucleons are part of the ground state doublet The proton has quark content of uud and the neutron udd In SU 3 flavour they are part of the ground state octet 8 of spin 1 2 baryons known as the Eightfold way The other members of this octet are the hyperons strange isotriplet S S0 S the L and the strange isodoublet 30 3 One can extend this multiplet in SU 4 flavour with the inclusion of the charm quark to the ground state 20 plet or to SU 6 flavour with the inclusion of the top and bottom quarks to the ground state 56 plet The article on isospin provides an explicit expression for the nucleon wave functions in terms of the quark flavour eigenstates ModelsThis section may be confusing or unclear to readers Please help clarify the section There might be a discussion about this on the talk page August 2007 Learn how and when to remove this message Although it is known that the nucleon is made from three quarks as of 2006 update it is not known how to solve the equations of motion for quantum chromodynamics Thus the study of the low energy properties of the nucleon are performed by means of models The only first principles approach available is to attempt to solve the equations of QCD numerically using lattice QCD This requires complicated algorithms and very powerful supercomputers However several analytic models also exist Skyrmion models The skyrmion models the nucleon as a topological soliton in a nonlinear SU 2 pion field The topological stability of the skyrmion is interpreted as the conservation of baryon number that is the non decay of the nucleon The local topological winding number density is identified with the local baryon number density of the nucleon With the pion isospin vector field oriented in the shape of a hedgehog space the model is readily solvable and is thus sometimes called the hedgehog model The hedgehog model is able to predict low energy parameters such as the nucleon mass radius and to approximately 30 of experimental values MIT bag model The MIT bag model confines quarks and gluons interacting through quantum chromodynamics to a region of space determined by balancing the pressure exerted by the quarks and gluons against a hypothetical pressure exerted by the vacuum on all colored quantum fields The simplest approximation to the model confines three non interacting quarks to a spherical cavity with the boundary condition that the quark vector current vanish on the boundary The non interacting treatment of the quarks is justified by appealing to the idea of asymptotic freedom whereas the hard boundary condition is justified by quark confinement Mathematically the model vaguely resembles that of a radar cavity with solutions to the Dirac equation standing in for solutions to the Maxwell equations and the vanishing vector current boundary condition standing for the conducting metal walls of the radar cavity If the radius of the bag is set to the radius of the nucleon the bag model predicts a nucleon mass that is within 30 of the actual mass Although the basic bag model does not provide a pion mediated interaction it describes excellently the nucleon nucleon forces through the 6 quark bag s channel mechanism using the P matrix Chiral bag model The chiral bag model merges the MIT bag model and the skyrmion model In this model a hole is punched out of the middle of the skyrmion and replaced with a bag model The boundary condition is provided by the requirement of continuity of the axial vector current across the bag boundary Very curiously the missing part of the topological winding number the baryon number of the hole punched into the skyrmion is exactly made up by the non zero vacuum expectation value or spectral asymmetry of the quark fields inside the bag As of 2017 update this remarkable trade off between topology and the spectrum of an operator does not have any grounding or explanation in the mathematical theory of Hilbert spaces and their relationship to geometry Several other properties of the chiral bag are notable It provides a better fit to the low energy nucleon properties to within 5 10 and these are almost completely independent of the chiral bag radius as long as the radius is less than the nucleon radius This independence of radius is referred to as the Cheshire Cat principle after the fading of Lewis Carroll s Cheshire Cat to just its smile It is expected that a first principles solution of the equations of QCD will demonstrate a similar duality of quark meson descriptions See alsoSLAC bag model Hadrons Electroweak interactionFootnotesThe resultant coefficients are obtained by summation of the component charges SQ 2 3 2 3 1 3 3 3 1 for proton and SQ 2 3 1 3 1 3 0 3 0 for neutron ReferencesGriffiths David J 2008 Introduction to Elementary Particles 2nd revised ed WILEY VCH ISBN 978 3 527 40601 2 Perkins Donald H 1982 Introduction to High Energy Physics Reading Massachusetts Addison Wesley pp 201 202 ISBN 978 0 201 05757 7 Kincade Kathy 2 February 2015 Pinpointing the magnetic moments of nuclear matter Phys org Archived from the original on 2 May 2015 Retrieved May 8 2015 Massam T Muller Th Righini B Schneegans M Zichichi A 1965 Experimental observation of antideuteron production Il Nuovo Cimento 39 1 10 14 Bibcode 1965NCimS 39 10M doi 10 1007 BF02814251 S2CID 122952224 Dorfan D E Eades J Lederman L M Lee W Ting C C June 1965 Observation of Antideuterons Phys Rev Lett 14 24 1003 1006 Bibcode 1965PhRvL 14 1003D doi 10 1103 PhysRevLett 14 1003 R Arsenescu et al 2003 Antihelium 3 production in lead lead collisions at 158 A GeV c New Journal of Physics 5 1 1 Bibcode 2003NJPh 5 1A doi 10 1088 1367 2630 5 1 301 Lithium 6 Compound summary PubChem National Library of Medicine Archived from the original on 2021 11 19 Retrieved 2021 04 08 Chodos et al New extended model of hadrons Archived 2023 12 30 at the Wayback Machine Phys Rev D 9 3471 1974 Chodos et al Baryon structure in the bag theory Archived 2023 12 30 at the Wayback Machine Phys Rev D 10 2599 1974 DeGrand et al Masses and other parameters of the light hadrons Archived 2023 12 30 at the Wayback Machine Phys Rev D 12 2060 1975 Jaffe R L Low F E 1979 Connection between quark model eigenstates and low energy scattering Phys Rev D 19 7 2105 Bibcode 1979PhRvD 19 2105J doi 10 1103 PhysRevD 19 2105 Yu Simonov A 1981 The quark compound bag model and the Jaffe Low P matrix Physics Letters B 107 1 2 1 Bibcode 1981PhLB 107 1S doi 10 1016 0370 2693 81 91133 3 Brown Gerald E Rho Mannque March 1979 The little bag Physics Letters B 82 2 177 180 Bibcode 1979PhLB 82 177B doi 10 1016 0370 2693 79 90729 9 Vepstas L Jackson A D Goldhaber A S 1984 Two phase models of baryons and the chiral Casimir effect Physics Letters B 140 5 6 280 284 Bibcode 1984PhLB 140 280V doi 10 1016 0370 2693 84 90753 6 Vepstas L Jackson A D 1990 Justifying the chiral bag Physics Reports 187 3 109 143 Bibcode 1990PhR 187 109V doi 10 1016 0370 1573 90 90056 8 Particle listings Particle listings p Archived 2017 01 27 at the Wayback Machine Particle listings n Archived 2018 10 03 at the Wayback Machine Particle listings Note on N and Delta Resonances Archived 2021 03 27 at the Wayback Machine Particle listings N 1440 Archived 2021 03 30 at the Wayback Machine Particle listings N 1520 Archived 2021 03 29 at the Wayback Machine Particle listings N 1535 Archived 2021 03 29 at the Wayback Machine Particle listings N 1650 Archived 2021 03 30 at the Wayback Machine Particle listings N 1675 Archived 2021 03 28 at the Wayback Machine Particle listings N 1680 Archived 2021 03 29 at the Wayback Machine Particle listings N 1700 Archived 2021 03 28 at the Wayback Machine Particle listings N 1710 Archived 2021 03 28 at the Wayback Machine Particle listings N 1720 Archived 2021 03 30 at the Wayback Machine Particle listings N 2190 Archived 2021 03 29 at the Wayback Machine Particle listings N 2220 Archived 2021 03 29 at the Wayback Machine Particle listings N 2250 Archived 2021 03 29 at the Wayback Machine Further readingThomas A W Weise W 2001 The Structure of the Nucleon Berlin DE Wiley WCH ISBN 3 527 40297 7 Brown G E Jackson A D 1976 The Nucleon Nucleon Interaction North Holland Publishing ISBN 978 0 7204 0335 0 Nakamura N Particle Data Group et al 2011 Review of Particle Physics Journal of Physics G 37 7 075021 Bibcode 2010JPhG 37g5021N doi 10 1088 0954 3899 37 7A 075021 hdl 10481 34593