Helium

Helium (from Greek: ἥλιος, romanized: helios, lit. 'sun') is a chemical element; it has symbol He and atomic number 2. It is a colorless, odorless, non-toxic, inert, monatomic gas and the first in the noble gas group in the periodic table. Its boiling point is the lowest among all the elements, and it does not have a melting point at standard pressures. It is the second-lightest and second most abundant element in the observable universe, after hydrogen. It is present at about 24% of the total elemental mass, which is more than 12 times the mass of all the heavier elements combined. Its abundance is similar to this in both the Sun and Jupiter, because of the very high nuclear binding energy (per nucleon) of helium-4, with respect to the next three elements after helium. This helium-4 binding energy also accounts for why it is a product of both nuclear fusion and radioactive decay. The most common isotope of helium in the universe is helium-4, the vast majority of which was formed during the Big Bang. Large amounts of new helium are created by nuclear fusion of hydrogen in stars.

Helium, ₂He

Helium
Pronunciation	/ˈhiːliəm/ ​(HEE-lee-əm)
Appearance	colorless gas, exhibiting a gray, cloudy glow (or reddish-orange if an especially high voltage is used) when placed in an electric field
Standard atomic weight Ar°(He)
	4.002602±0.000002 4.0026±0.0001 (abridged)
Helium in the periodic table
Hydrogen Helium Lithium Beryllium Boron Carbon Nitrogen Oxygen Fluorine Neon Sodium Magnesium Aluminium Silicon Phosphorus Sulfur Chlorine Argon Potassium Calcium Scandium Titanium Vanadium Chromium Manganese Iron Cobalt Nickel Copper Zinc Gallium Germanium Arsenic Selenium Bromine Krypton Rubidium Strontium Yttrium Zirconium Niobium Molybdenum Technetium Ruthenium Rhodium Palladium Silver Cadmium Indium Tin Antimony Tellurium Iodine Xenon Caesium Barium Lanthanum Cerium Praseodymium Neodymium Promethium Samarium Europium Gadolinium Terbium Dysprosium Holmium Erbium Thulium Ytterbium Lutetium Hafnium Tantalum Tungsten Rhenium Osmium Iridium Platinum Gold Mercury (element) Thallium Lead Bismuth Polonium Astatine Radon Francium Radium Actinium Thorium Protactinium Uranium Neptunium Plutonium Americium Curium Berkelium Californium Einsteinium Fermium Mendelevium Nobelium Lawrencium Rutherfordium Dubnium Seaborgium Bohrium Hassium Meitnerium Darmstadtium Roentgenium Copernicium Nihonium Flerovium Moscovium Livermorium Tennessine Oganesson – ↑ He ↓ Ne hydrogen ← helium → lithium
Atomic number (Z)	2
Group	group 18 (noble gases)
Period	period 1
Block	s-block
Electron configuration	1s^2
Electrons per shell	2
Physical properties
Phase at STP	gas
Boiling point	4.222 K ​(−268.928 °C, ​−452.070 °F)
Density (at STP)	0.1786 g/L
when liquid (at b.p.)	0.125 g/cm^3
Triple point	2.177 K, ​5.043 kPa
Critical point	5.1953 K, 0.22746 MPa
Heat of fusion	0.0138 kJ/mol
Heat of vaporization	0.0829 kJ/mol
Molar heat capacity	20.78 J/(mol·K)
Vapor pressure (defined by ITS-90) P (Pa) 1 10 100 1 k 10 k 100 k at T (K)     1.23 1.67 2.48 4.21
Atomic properties
Oxidation states	common: (none) 0
Electronegativity	Pauling scale: no data
Ionization energies	1st: 2372.3 kJ/mol 2nd: 5250.5 kJ/mol
Covalent radius	28 pm
Van der Waals radius	140 pm
Spectral lines of helium
Other properties
Natural occurrence	primordial
Crystal structure	​hexagonal close-packed (hcp)
Thermal conductivity	0.1513 W/(m⋅K)
Magnetic ordering	diamagnetic
Molar magnetic susceptibility	−1.88×10^−6 cm^3/mol (298 K)
Speed of sound	972 m/s
CAS Number	7440-59-7
History
Naming	after Helios, Greek god of the Sun
Discovery	Norman Lockyer (1868)
First isolation	William Ramsay, Per Teodor Cleve, Abraham Langlet (1895)
Isotopes of helium v e
Main isotopes Decay abun­dance half-life (t1/2) mode pro­duct ^3He 0.0002% stable ^4He 99.9998% stable
Category: Helium view talk edit | references

Helium was first detected as an unknown, yellow spectral line signature in sunlight during a solar eclipse in 1868 by Georges Rayet, Captain C. T. Haig,Norman R. Pogson, and Lieutenant John Herschel, and was subsequently confirmed by French astronomer Jules Janssen. Janssen is often jointly credited with detecting the element, along with Norman Lockyer. Janssen recorded the helium spectral line during the solar eclipse of 1868, while Lockyer observed it from Britain. However, only Lockyer proposed that the line was due to a new element, which he named after the Sun. The formal discovery of the element was made in 1895 by chemists Sir William Ramsay, Per Teodor Cleve, and Nils Abraham Langlet, who found helium emanating from the uranium ore cleveite, which is now not regarded as a separate mineral species, but as a variety of uraninite. In 1903, large reserves of helium were found in natural gas fields in parts of the United States, by far the largest supplier of the gas today.

Liquid helium is used in cryogenics (its largest single use, consuming about a quarter of production), and in the cooling of superconducting magnets, with its main commercial application in MRI scanners. Helium's other industrial uses—as a pressurizing and purge gas, as a protective atmosphere for arc welding, and in processes such as growing crystals to make silicon wafers—account for half of the gas produced. A small but well-known use is as a lifting gas in balloons and airships. As with any gas whose density differs from that of air, inhaling a small volume of helium temporarily changes the timbre and quality of the human voice. In scientific research, the behavior of the two fluid phases of helium-4 (helium I and helium II) is important to researchers studying quantum mechanics (in particular the property of superfluidity) and to those looking at the phenomena, such as superconductivity, produced in matter near absolute zero.

On Earth, it is relatively rare—5.2 ppm by volume in the atmosphere. Most terrestrial helium present today is created by the natural radioactive decay of heavy radioactive elements (thorium and uranium, although there are other examples), as the alpha particles emitted by such decays consist of helium-4 nuclei. This radiogenic helium is trapped with natural gas in concentrations as great as 7% by volume, from which it is extracted commercially by a low-temperature separation process called fractional distillation. Terrestrial helium is a non-renewable resource because once released into the atmosphere, it promptly escapes into space. Its supply is thought to be rapidly diminishing. However, some studies suggest that helium produced deep in the Earth by radioactive decay can collect in natural gas reserves in larger-than-expected quantities, in some cases having been released by volcanic activity.

History

Scientific discoveries

The first evidence of helium was observed on August 18, 1868, as a bright yellow line with a wavelength of 587.49 nanometers in the spectrum of the chromosphere of the Sun. The line was detected by French astronomer Jules Janssen during a total solar eclipse in Guntur, India. This line was initially assumed to be sodium. On October 20 of the same year, English astronomer Norman Lockyer observed a yellow line in the solar spectrum, which he named the D₃ because it was near the known D₁ and D₂Fraunhofer lines of sodium. He concluded that it was caused by an element in the Sun unknown on Earth. Lockyer named the element with the Greek word for the Sun, ἥλιος (helios). It is sometimes said that English chemist Edward Frankland was also involved in the naming, but this is unlikely as he doubted the existence of this new element. The ending "-ium" is unusual, as it normally applies only to metallic elements; probably Lockyer, being an astronomer, was unaware of the chemical conventions.

Spectral lines of helium

In 1881, Italian physicist Luigi Palmieri detected helium on Earth for the first time through its D₃ spectral line, when he analyzed a material that had been sublimated during a recent eruption of Mount Vesuvius.

Sir William Ramsay, the discoverer of terrestrial helium

The cleveite sample from which Ramsay first purified helium

On March 26, 1895, Scottish chemist Sir William Ramsay isolated helium on Earth by treating the mineral cleveite (a variety of uraninite with at least 10% rare-earth elements) with mineral acids. Ramsay was looking for argon but, after separating nitrogen and oxygen from the gas, liberated by sulfuric acid, he noticed a bright yellow line that matched the D₃ line observed in the spectrum of the Sun. These samples were identified as helium by Lockyer and British physicist William Crookes. It was independently isolated from cleveite in the same year by chemists Per Teodor Cleve and Abraham Langlet in Uppsala, Sweden, who collected enough of the gas to accurately determine its atomic weight. Helium was also isolated by American geochemist William Francis Hillebrand prior to Ramsay's discovery, when he noticed unusual spectral lines while testing a sample of the mineral uraninite. Hillebrand, however, attributed the lines to nitrogen. His letter of congratulations to Ramsay offers an interesting case of discovery, and near-discovery, in science.

In 1907, Ernest Rutherford and Thomas Royds demonstrated that alpha particles are helium nuclei by allowing the particles to penetrate the thin glass wall of an evacuated tube, then creating a discharge in the tube, to study the spectrum of the new gas inside. In 1908, helium was first liquefied by Dutch physicist Heike Kamerlingh Onnes by cooling the gas to less than 5 K (−268.15 °C; −450.67 °F). He tried to solidify it by further reducing the temperature but failed, because helium does not solidify at atmospheric pressure. Onnes' student Willem Hendrik Keesom was eventually able to solidify 1 cm³ of helium in 1926 by applying additional external pressure.

In 1913, Niels Bohr published his "trilogy" on atomic structure that included a reconsideration of the Pickering–Fowler series as central evidence in support of his model of the atom. This series is named for Edward Charles Pickering, who in 1896 published observations of previously unknown lines in the spectrum of the star ζ Puppis (these are now known to occur with Wolf–Rayet and other hot stars). Pickering attributed the observation (lines at 4551, 5411, and 10123 Å) to a new form of hydrogen with half-integer transition levels. In 1912, Alfred Fowler managed to produce similar lines from a hydrogen-helium mixture, and supported Pickering's conclusion as to their origin. Bohr's model does not allow for half-integer transitions (nor does quantum mechanics) and Bohr concluded that Pickering and Fowler were wrong, and instead assigned these spectral lines to ionised helium, He⁺. Fowler was initially skeptical but was ultimately convinced that Bohr was correct, and by 1915 "spectroscopists had transferred [the Pickering–Fowler series] definitively [from hydrogen] to helium." Bohr's theoretical work on the Pickering series had demonstrated the need for "a re-examination of problems that seemed already to have been solved within classical theories" and provided important confirmation for his atomic theory.

In 1938, Russian physicist Pyotr Leonidovich Kapitsa discovered that helium-4 has almost no viscosity at temperatures near absolute zero, a phenomenon now called superfluidity. This phenomenon is related to Bose–Einstein condensation. In 1972, the same phenomenon was observed in helium-3, but at temperatures much closer to absolute zero, by American physicists Douglas D. Osheroff, David M. Lee, and Robert C. Richardson. The phenomenon in helium-3 is thought to be related to pairing of helium-3 fermions to make bosons, in analogy to Cooper pairs of electrons producing superconductivity.

In 1961, Vignos and Fairbank reported the existence of a different phase of solid helium-4, designated the gamma-phase. It exists for a narrow range of pressure between 1.45 and 1.78 K.

Extraction and use

Historical marker, denoting a massive helium find near Dexter, Kansas

After an oil drilling operation in 1903 in Dexter, Kansas produced a gas geyser that would not burn, Kansas state geologist Erasmus Haworth collected samples of the escaping gas and took them back to the University of Kansas at Lawrence where, with the help of chemists Hamilton Cady and David McFarland, he discovered that the gas consisted of, by volume, 72% nitrogen, 15% methane (a combustible percentage only with sufficient oxygen), 1% hydrogen, and 12% an unidentifiable gas. With further analysis, Cady and McFarland discovered that 1.84% of the gas sample was helium. This showed that despite its overall rarity on Earth, helium was concentrated in large quantities under the American Great Plains, available for extraction as a byproduct of natural gas.

Following a suggestion by Sir Richard Threlfall, the United States Navy sponsored three small experimental helium plants during World War I. The goal was to supply barrage balloons with the non-flammable, lighter-than-air gas. A total of 5,700 m³ (200,000 cu ft) of 92% helium was produced in the program even though less than a cubic meter of the gas had previously been obtained. Some of this gas was used in the world's first helium-filled airship, the U.S. Navy's C-class blimp C-7, which flew its maiden voyage from Hampton Roads, Virginia, to Bolling Field in Washington, D.C., on December 1, 1921, nearly two years before the Navy's first rigid helium-filled airship, the Naval Aircraft Factory-built USS Shenandoah, flew in September 1923.

Although the extraction process using low-temperature gas liquefaction was not developed in time to be significant during World War I, production continued. Helium was primarily used as a lifting gas in lighter-than-air craft. During World War II, the demand increased for helium for lifting gas and for shielded arc welding. The helium mass spectrometer was also vital in the atomic bomb Manhattan Project.

The government of the United States set up the National Helium Reserve in 1925 at Amarillo, Texas, with the goal of supplying military airships in time of war and commercial airships in peacetime. Because of the Helium Act of 1925, which banned the export of scarce helium on which the US then had a production monopoly, together with the prohibitive cost of the gas, German Zeppelins were forced to use hydrogen as lifting gas, which would gain infamy in the Hindenburg disaster. The helium market after World War II was depressed but the reserve was expanded in the 1950s to ensure a supply of liquid helium as a coolant to create oxygen/hydrogen rocket fuel (among other uses) during the Space Race and Cold War. Helium use in the United States in 1965 was more than eight times the peak wartime consumption.

After the Helium Acts Amendments of 1960 (Public Law 86–777), the U.S. Bureau of Mines arranged for five private plants to recover helium from natural gas. For this helium conservation program, the Bureau built a 425-mile (684 km) pipeline from Bushton, Kansas, to connect those plants with the government's partially depleted Cliffside gas field near Amarillo, Texas. This helium-nitrogen mixture was injected and stored in the Cliffside gas field until needed, at which time it was further purified.

By 1995, a billion cubic meters of the gas had been collected and the reserve was US$1.4 billion in debt, prompting the Congress of the United States in 1996 to discontinue the reserve. The resulting Helium Privatization Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–273) directed the United States Department of the Interior to empty the reserve, with sales starting by 2005.

Helium produced between 1930 and 1945 was about 98.3% pure (2% nitrogen), which was adequate for airships. In 1945, a small amount of 99.9% helium was produced for welding use. By 1949, commercial quantities of Grade A 99.95% helium were available.

For many years, the United States produced more than 90% of commercially usable helium in the world, while extraction plants in Canada, Poland, Russia, and other nations produced the remainder. In the mid-1990s, a new plant in Arzew, Algeria, producing 17 million cubic metres (600 million cubic feet) began operation, with enough production to cover all of Europe's demand. Meanwhile, by 2000, the consumption of helium within the U.S. had risen to more than 15 million kg per year. In 2004–2006, additional plants in Ras Laffan, Qatar, and Skikda, Algeria were built. Algeria quickly became the second leading producer of helium. Through this time, both helium consumption and the costs of producing helium increased. From 2002 to 2007 helium prices doubled.

As of 2012^[update], the United States National Helium Reserve accounted for 30 percent of the world's helium. The reserve was expected to run out of helium in 2018. Despite that, a proposed bill in the United States Senate would allow the reserve to continue to sell the gas. Other large reserves were in the Hugoton in Kansas, United States, and nearby gas fields of Kansas and the panhandles of Texas and Oklahoma. New helium plants were scheduled to open in 2012 in Qatar, Russia, and the US state of Wyoming, but they were not expected to ease the shortage.

In 2013, Qatar started up the world's largest helium unit, although the 2017 Qatar diplomatic crisis severely affected helium production there. 2014 was widely acknowledged to be a year of over-supply in the helium business, following years of renowned shortages. Nasdaq reported (2015) that for Air Products, an international corporation that sells gases for industrial use, helium volumes remain under economic pressure due to feedstock supply constraints.

Characteristics

Atom

The helium atom. Depicted are the nucleus (pink) and the electron cloud distribution (black). The nucleus (upper right) in helium-4 is in reality spherically symmetric and closely resembles the electron cloud, although for more complicated nuclei this is not always the case.

In quantum mechanics

In the perspective of quantum mechanics, helium is the second simplest atom to model, following the hydrogen atom. Helium is composed of two electrons in atomic orbitals surrounding a nucleus containing two protons and (usually) two neutrons. As in Newtonian mechanics, no system that consists of more than two particles can be solved with an exact analytical mathematical approach (see 3-body problem) and helium is no exception. Thus, numerical mathematical methods are required, even to solve the system of one nucleus and two electrons. Such computational chemistry methods have been used to create a quantum mechanical picture of helium electron binding which is accurate to within < 2% of the correct value, in a few computational steps. Such models show that each electron in helium partly screens the nucleus from the other, so that the effective nuclear charge Z_eff which each electron sees is about 1.69 units, not the 2 charges of a classic "bare" helium nucleus.

Related stability of the helium-4 nucleus and electron shell

The nucleus of the helium-4 atom is identical with an alpha particle. High-energy electron-scattering experiments show its charge to decrease exponentially from a maximum at a central point, exactly as does the charge density of helium's own electron cloud. This symmetry reflects similar underlying physics: the pair of neutrons and the pair of protons in helium's nucleus obey the same quantum mechanical rules as do helium's pair of electrons (although the nuclear particles are subject to a different nuclear binding potential), so that all these fermions fully occupy 1s orbitals in pairs, none of them possessing orbital angular momentum, and each cancelling the other's intrinsic spin. This arrangement is thus energetically extremely stable for all these particles and has astrophysical implications. Namely, adding another particle – proton, neutron, or alpha particle – would consume rather than release energy; all systems with mass number 5, as well as beryllium-8 (comprising two alpha particles), are unbound.

For example, the stability and low energy of the electron cloud state in helium accounts for the element's chemical inertness, and also the lack of interaction of helium atoms with each other, producing the lowest melting and boiling points of all the elements. In a similar way, the particular energetic stability of the helium-4 nucleus, produced by similar effects, accounts for the ease of helium-4 production in atomic reactions that involve either heavy-particle emission or fusion. Some stable helium-3 (two protons and one neutron) is produced in fusion reactions from hydrogen, though its estimated abundance in the universe is about 10⁻⁵ relative to helium-4.

Binding energy per nucleon of common isotopes. The binding energy per particle of helium-4 is significantly larger than all nearby nuclides.

The unusual stability of the helium-4 nucleus is also important cosmologically: it explains the fact that in the first few minutes after the Big Bang, as the "soup" of free protons and neutrons which had initially been created in about 6:1 ratio cooled to the point that nuclear binding was possible, almost all first compound atomic nuclei to form were helium-4 nuclei. Owing to the relatively tight binding of helium-4 nuclei, its production consumed nearly all of the free neutrons in a few minutes, before they could beta-decay, and thus few neutrons were available to form heavier atoms such as lithium, beryllium, or boron. Helium-4 nuclear binding per nucleon is stronger than in any of these elements (see nucleogenesis and binding energy) and thus, once helium had been formed, no energetic drive was available to make elements 3, 4 and 5. It is barely energetically favorable for helium to fuse into the next element with a lower energy per nucleon, carbon. However, due to the short lifetime of the intermediate beryllium-8, this process requires three helium nuclei striking each other nearly simultaneously (see triple-alpha process). There was thus no time for significant carbon to be formed in the few minutes after the Big Bang, before the early expanding universe cooled to the temperature and pressure point where helium fusion to carbon was no longer possible. This left the early universe with a very similar ratio of hydrogen/helium as is observed today (3 parts hydrogen to 1 part helium-4 by mass), with nearly all the neutrons in the universe trapped in helium-4.

All heavier elements (including those necessary for rocky planets like the Earth, and for carbon-based or other life) have thus been created since the Big Bang in stars which were hot enough to fuse helium itself. All elements other than hydrogen and helium today account for only 2% of the mass of atomic matter in the universe. Helium-4, by contrast, comprises about 24% of the mass of the universe's ordinary matter—nearly all the ordinary matter that is not hydrogen.

Gas and plasma phases

Helium discharge tube shaped into 'He', the element's symbol.

Helium is the second least reactive noble gas after neon, and thus the second least reactive of all elements. It is chemically inert and monatomic in all standard conditions. Because of helium's relatively low molar (atomic) mass, its thermal conductivity, specific heat, and sound speed in the gas phase are all greater than any other gas except hydrogen. For these reasons and the small size of helium monatomic molecules, helium diffuses through solids at a rate three times that of air and around 65% that of hydrogen.

Helium is the least water-soluble monatomic gas, and one of the least water-soluble of any gas (CF₄, SF₆, and C₄F₈ have lower mole fraction solubilities: 0.3802, 0.4394, and 0.2372 x₂/10⁻⁵, respectively, versus helium's 0.70797 x₂/10⁻⁵), and helium's index of refraction is closer to unity than that of any other gas. Helium has a negative Joule–Thomson coefficient at normal ambient temperatures, meaning it heats up when allowed to freely expand. Only below its Joule–Thomson inversion temperature (of about 32 to 50 K at 1 atmosphere) does it cool upon free expansion. Once precooled below this temperature, helium can be liquefied through expansion cooling.

Most extraterrestrial helium is plasma in stars, with properties quite different from those of atomic helium. In a plasma, helium's electrons are not bound to its nucleus, resulting in very high electrical conductivity, even when the gas is only partially ionized. The charged particles are highly influenced by magnetic and electric fields. For example, in the solar wind together with ionized hydrogen, the particles interact with the Earth's magnetosphere, giving rise to Birkeland currents and the aurora.

Liquid phase

Phase diagram of helium-4. (Atmospheric pressure is about 0.1 MPa)

Liquefied helium. This helium is not only liquid, but has been cooled to the point of superfluidity. The drop of liquid at the bottom of the glass represents helium spontaneously escaping from the container over the side, to empty out of the container. The energy to drive this process is supplied by the potential energy of the falling helium.

Helium liquifies when cooled below 4.2 K at atmospheric pressure. Unlike any other element, however, helium remains liquid down to a temperature of absolute zero. This is a direct effect of quantum mechanics: specifically, the zero point energy of the system is too high to allow freezing. Pressures above about 25 atmospheres are required to freeze it. There are two liquid phases: Helium I is a conventional liquid, and Helium II, which occurs at a lower temperature, is a superfluid.

Helium I

Below its boiling point of 4.22 K (−268.93 °C; −452.07 °F) and above the lambda point of 2.1768 K (−270.9732 °C; −455.7518 °F), the isotope helium-4 exists in a normal colorless liquid state, called helium I. Like other cryogenic liquids, helium I boils when it is heated and contracts when its temperature is lowered. Below the lambda point, however, helium does not boil, and it expands as the temperature is lowered further.

Helium I has a gas-like index of refraction of 1.026 which makes its surface so hard to see that floats of Styrofoam are often used to show where the surface is. This colorless liquid has a very low viscosity and a density of 0.145–0.125 g/mL (between about 0 and 4 K), which is only one-fourth the value expected from classical physics.Quantum mechanics is needed to explain this property and thus both states of liquid helium (helium I and helium II) are called quantum fluids, meaning they display atomic properties on a macroscopic scale. This may be an effect of its boiling point being so close to absolute zero, preventing random molecular motion (thermal energy) from masking the atomic properties.

Helium II

Liquid helium below its lambda point (called helium II) exhibits very unusual characteristics. Due to its high thermal conductivity, when it boils, it does not bubble but rather evaporates directly from its surface. Helium-3 also has a superfluid phase, but only at much lower temperatures; as a result, less is known about the properties of the isotope.

Unlike ordinary liquids, helium II will creep along surfaces in order to reach an equal level; after a short while, the levels in the two containers will equalize. The Rollin film also covers the interior of the larger container; if it were not sealed, the helium II would creep out and escape.

Helium II is a superfluid, a quantum mechanical state of matter with strange properties. For example, when it flows through capillaries as thin as 10 to 100 nm it has no measurable viscosity. However, when measurements were done between two moving discs, a viscosity comparable to that of gaseous helium was observed. Existing theory explains this using the two-fluid model for helium II. In this model, liquid helium below the lambda point is viewed as containing a proportion of helium atoms in a ground state, which are superfluid and flow with exactly zero viscosity, and a proportion of helium atoms in an excited state, which behave more like an ordinary fluid.

In the fountain effect, a chamber is constructed which is connected to a reservoir of helium II by a sintered disc through which superfluid helium leaks easily but through which non-superfluid helium cannot pass. If the interior of the container is heated, the superfluid helium changes to non-superfluid helium. In order to maintain the equilibrium fraction of superfluid helium, superfluid helium leaks through and increases the pressure, causing liquid to fountain out of the container.

The thermal conductivity of helium II is greater than that of any other known substance, a million times that of helium I and several hundred times that of copper. This is because heat conduction occurs by an exceptional quantum mechanism. Most materials that conduct heat well have a valence band of free electrons which serve to transfer the heat. Helium II has no such valence band but nevertheless conducts heat well. The flow of heat is governed by equations that are similar to the wave equation used to characterize sound propagation in air. When heat is introduced, it moves at 20 meters per second at 1.8 K through helium II as waves in a phenomenon known as second sound.

Helium II also exhibits a creeping effect. When a surface extends past the level of helium II, the helium II moves along the surface, against the force of gravity. Helium II will escape from a vessel that is not sealed by creeping along the sides until it reaches a warmer region where it evaporates. It moves in a 30 nm-thick film regardless of surface material. This film is called a Rollin film and is named after the man who first characterized this trait, . As a result of this creeping behavior and helium II's ability to leak rapidly through tiny openings, it is very difficult to confine. Unless the container is carefully constructed, the helium II will creep along the surfaces and through valves until it reaches somewhere warmer, where it will evaporate. Waves propagating across a Rollin film are governed by the same equation as gravity waves in shallow water, but rather than gravity, the restoring force is the van der Waals force. These waves are known as third sound.

Solid phases

Helium remains liquid down to absolute zero at atmospheric pressure, but it freezes at high pressure. Solid helium requires a temperature of 1–1.5 K (about −272 °C or −457 °F) at about 25 bar (2.5 MPa) of pressure. It is often hard to distinguish solid from liquid helium since the refractive index of the two phases are nearly the same. The solid has a sharp melting point and has a crystalline structure, but it is highly compressible; applying pressure in a laboratory can decrease its volume by more than 30%. With a bulk modulus of about 27 MPa it is ~100 times more compressible than water. Solid helium has a density of 0.214±0.006 g/cm³ at 1.15 K and 66 atm; the projected density at 0 K and 25 bar (2.5 MPa) is 0.187±0.009 g/cm³. At higher temperatures, helium will solidify with sufficient pressure. At room temperature, this requires about 114,000 atm.

Helium-4 and helium-3 both form several crystalline solid phases, all requiring at least 25 bar. They both form an α phase, which has a hexagonal close-packed (hcp) crystal structure, a β phase, which is face-centered cubic (fcc), and a γ phase, which is body-centered cubic (bcc).

Isotopes

There are nine known isotopes of helium of which two, helium-3 and helium-4, are stable. In the Earth's atmosphere, one atom is ³
He for every million that are ⁴
He. Unlike most elements, helium's isotopic abundance varies greatly by origin, due to the different formation processes. The most common isotope, helium-4, is produced on Earth by alpha decay of heavier radioactive elements; the alpha particles that emerge are fully ionized helium-4 nuclei. Helium-4 is an unusually stable nucleus because its nucleons are arranged into complete shells. It was also formed in enormous quantities during Big Bang nucleosynthesis.

Helium-3 is present on Earth only in trace amounts. Most of it has been present since Earth's formation, though some falls to Earth trapped in cosmic dust. Trace amounts are also produced by the beta decay of tritium. Rocks from the Earth's crust have isotope ratios varying by as much as a factor of ten, and these ratios can be used to investigate the origin of rocks and the composition of the Earth's mantle.³
He is much more abundant in stars as a product of nuclear fusion. Thus in the interstellar medium, the proportion of ³
He to ⁴
He is about 100 times higher than on Earth. Extraplanetary material, such as lunar and asteroid regolith, have trace amounts of helium-3 from being bombarded by solar winds. The Moon's surface contains helium-3 at concentrations on the order of 10 ppb, much higher than the approximately 5 ppt found in the Earth's atmosphere. A number of people, starting with Gerald Kulcinski in 1986, have proposed to explore the Moon, mine lunar regolith, and use the helium-3 for fusion.

Liquid helium-4 can be cooled to about 1 K (−272.15 °C; −457.87 °F) using evaporative cooling in a 1-K pot. Similar cooling of helium-3, which has a lower boiling point, can achieve about 0.2 kelvin in a helium-3 refrigerator. Equal mixtures of liquid ³
He and ⁴
He below 0.8 K separate into two immiscible phases due to their dissimilarity (they follow different quantum statistics: helium-4 atoms are bosons while helium-3 atoms are fermions).Dilution refrigerators use this immiscibility to achieve temperatures of a few millikelvins.

It is possible to produce exotic helium isotopes, which rapidly decay into other substances. The shortest-lived heavy helium isotope is the unbound helium-10 with a half-life of 2.6(4)×10⁻²² s. Helium-6 decays by emitting a beta particle and has a half-life of 0.8 second. Helium-7 and helium-8 are created in certain nuclear reactions. Helium-6 and helium-8 are known to exhibit a nuclear halo.

Properties

Table of thermal and physical properties of helium gas at atmospheric pressure:

Temperature (K)	Density (kg/m^3)	Specific heat (kJ/kg °C)	Dynamic viscosity (kg/m s)	Kinematic viscosity (m^2/s)	Thermal conductivity (W/m °C)	Thermal diffusivity (m^2/s)	Prandtl number
100		5.193	9.63E-06	1.98E-05	0.073	2.89E-05	0.686
120	0.406	5.193	1.07E-05	2.64E-05	0.0819	3.88E-05	0.679
144	0.3379	5.193	1.26E-05	3.71E-05	0.0928	5.28E-05	0.7
200	0.2435	5.193	1.57E-05	6.44E-05	0.1177	9.29E-05	0.69
255	0.1906	5.193	1.82E-05	9.55E-05	0.1357	1.37E-04	0.7
366	0.1328	5.193	2.31E-05	1.74E-04	0.1691	2.45E-04	0.71
477	0.10204	5.193	2.75E-05	2.69E-04	0.197	3.72E-04	0.72
589	0.08282	5.193	3.11E-05	3.76E-04	0.225	5.22E-04	0.72
700	0.07032	5.193	3.48E-05	4.94E-04	0.251	6.66E-04	0.72
800	0.06023	5.193	3.82E-05	6.34E-04	0.275	8.77E-04	0.72
900	0.05451	5.193	4.14E-05	7.59E-04	0.33	1.14E-03	0.687
1000		5.193	4.46E-05	9.14E-04	0.354	1.40E-03	0.654

Compounds

Structure of the helium hydride ion, HHe⁺

Structure of the suspected fluoroheliate anion, OHeF⁻

Helium has a valence of zero and is chemically unreactive under all normal conditions. It is an electrical insulator unless ionized. As with the other noble gases, helium has metastable energy levels that allow it to remain ionized in an electrical discharge with a voltage below its ionization potential. Helium can form unstable compounds, known as excimers, with tungsten, iodine, fluorine, sulfur, and phosphorus when it is subjected to a glow discharge, to electron bombardment, or reduced to plasma by other means. The molecular compounds HeNe, HgHe₁₀, and WHe₂, and the molecular ions He⁺
₂, He²⁺
₂, HeH⁺
, and HeD⁺
have been created this way. HeH⁺ is also stable in its ground state but is extremely reactive—it is the strongest Brønsted acid known, and therefore can exist only in isolation, as it will protonate any molecule or counteranion it contacts. This technique has also produced the neutral molecule He₂, which has a large number of band systems, and HgHe, which is apparently held together only by polarization forces.

Van der Waals compounds of helium can also be formed with cryogenic helium gas and atoms of some other substance, such as LiHe and He₂.

Theoretically, other true compounds may be possible, such as helium fluorohydride (HHeF), which would be analogous to HArF, discovered in 2000. Calculations show that two new compounds containing a helium-oxygen bond could be stable. Two new molecular species, predicted using theory, CsFHeO and N(CH₃)₄FHeO, are derivatives of a metastable FHeO⁻ anion first theorized in 2005 by a group from Taiwan.

Helium atoms have been inserted into the hollow carbon cage molecules (the fullerenes) by heating under high pressure. The endohedral fullerene molecules formed are stable at high temperatures. When chemical derivatives of these fullerenes are formed, the helium stays inside. If helium-3 is used, it can be readily observed by helium nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Many fullerenes containing helium-3 have been reported. Although the helium atoms are not attached by covalent or ionic bonds, these substances have distinct properties and a definite composition, like all stoichiometric chemical compounds.

Under high pressures helium can form compounds with various other elements. Helium-nitrogen clathrate (He(N₂)₁₁) crystals have been grown at room temperature at pressures ca. 10 GPa in a diamond anvil cell. The insulating electride Na₂He has been shown to be thermodynamically stable at pressures above 113 GPa. It has a fluorite structure.

Occurrence and production

Natural abundance

Although it is rare on Earth, helium is the second most abundant element in the known Universe, constituting 23% of its baryonic mass. Only hydrogen is more abundant. The vast majority of helium was formed by Big Bang nucleosynthesis one to three minutes after the Big Bang. As such, measurements of its abundance contribute to cosmological models. In stars, it is formed by the nuclear fusion of hydrogen in proton–proton chain reactions and the CNO cycle, part of stellar nucleosynthesis.

In the Earth's atmosphere, the concentration of helium by volume is only 5.2 parts per million. The concentration is low and fairly constant despite the continuous production of new helium because most helium in the Earth's atmosphere escapes into space by several processes. In the Earth's heterosphere, a part of the upper atmosphere, helium and hydrogen are the most abundant elements.

Most helium on Earth is a result of radioactive decay. Helium is found in large amounts in minerals of uranium and thorium, including uraninite and its varieties cleveite and pitchblende,carnotite and monazite (a group name; "monazite" usually refers to monazite-(Ce)), because they emit alpha particles (helium nuclei, He²⁺) to which electrons immediately combine as soon as the particle is stopped by the rock. In this way an estimated 3000 metric tons of helium are generated per year throughout the lithosphere. In the Earth's crust, the concentration of helium is 8 parts per billion. In seawater, the concentration is only 4 parts per trillion. There are also small amounts in mineral springs, volcanic gas, and meteoric iron. Because helium is trapped in the subsurface under conditions that also trap natural gas, the greatest natural concentrations of helium on the planet are found in natural gas, from which most commercial helium is extracted. The concentration varies in a broad range from a few ppm to more than 7% in a small gas field in San Juan County, New Mexico.

As of 2021^[update], the world's helium reserves were estimated at 31 billion cubic meters, with a third of that being in Qatar. In 2015 and 2016 additional probable reserves were announced to be under the Rocky Mountains in North America and in the East African Rift.

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has proposed an October 2024 plan for managing natural resources in western Colorado. The plan involves closing 543,000 acres to oil and gas leasing while keeping 692,300 acres open. Among the open areas, 165,700 acres have been identified as suitable for helium recovery. The United States possesses an estimated 306 billion cubic feet of recoverable helium, sufficient to meet current consumption rates of 2.15 billion cubic feet per year for approximately 150 years.

Modern extraction and distribution

For large-scale use, helium is extracted by fractional distillation from natural gas, which can contain as much as 7% helium. Since helium has a lower boiling point than any other element, low temperatures and high pressure are used to liquefy nearly all the other gases (mostly nitrogen and methane). The resulting crude helium gas is purified by successive exposures to lowering temperatures, in which almost all of the remaining nitrogen and other gases are precipitated out of the gaseous mixture. Activated charcoal is used as a final purification step, usually resulting in 99.995% pure Grade-A helium. The principal impurity in Grade-A helium is neon. In a final production step, most of the helium that is produced is liquefied via a cryogenic process. This is necessary for applications requiring liquid helium and also allows helium suppliers to reduce the cost of long-distance transportation, as the largest liquid helium containers have more than five times the capacity of the largest gaseous helium tube trailers.

In 2008, approximately 169 million standard cubic meters (SCM) of helium were extracted from natural gas or withdrawn from helium reserves, with approximately 78% from the United States, 10% from Algeria, and most of the remainder from Russia, Poland, and Qatar. By 2013, increases in helium production in Qatar (under the company Qatargas managed by Air Liquide) had increased Qatar's fraction of world helium production to 25%, making it the second largest exporter after the United States. An estimated 54 billion cubic feet (1.5×10⁹ m³) deposit of helium was found in Tanzania in 2016. A large-scale helium plant was opened in Ningxia, China in 2020.

In the United States, most helium is extracted from the natural gas of the Hugoton and nearby gas fields in Kansas, Oklahoma, and the Panhandle Field in Texas. Much of this gas was once sent by pipeline to the National Helium Reserve, but since 2005, this reserve has been depleted and sold off, and it is expected to be largely depleted by 2021 under the October 2013 Responsible Helium Administration and Stewardship Act (H.R. 527). The helium fields of the western United States are emerging as an alternate source of helium supply, particularly those of the "Four Corners" region (the states of Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico and Utah).

Diffusion of crude natural gas through special semipermeable membranes and other barriers is another method to recover and purify helium. In 1996, the U.S. had proven helium reserves in such gas well complexes of about 147 billion standard cubic feet (4.2 billion SCM). At rates of use at that time (72 million SCM per year in the U.S.; see pie chart below) this would have been enough helium for about 58 years of U.S. use, and less than this (perhaps 80% of the time) at world use rates, although factors in saving and processing impact effective reserve numbers.

Helium is generally extracted from natural gas because it is present in air at only a fraction of that of neon, yet the demand for it is far higher. It is estimated that if all neon production were retooled to save helium, 0.1% of the world's helium demands would be satisfied. Similarly, only 1% of the world's helium demands could be satisfied by re-tooling all air distillation plants. Helium can be synthesized by bombardment of lithium or boron with high-velocity protons, or by bombardment of lithium with deuterons, but these processes are a completely uneconomical method of production.

Helium is commercially available in either liquid or gaseous form. As a liquid, it can be supplied in small insulated containers called dewars which hold as much as 1,000 liters of helium, or in large ISO containers, which have nominal capacities as large as 42 m³ (around 11,000 U.S. gallons). In gaseous form, small quantities of helium are supplied in high-pressure cylinders holding as much as 8 m³ (approximately . 282 standard cubic feet), while large quantities of high-pressure gas are supplied in tube trailers, which have capacities of as much as 4,860 m³ (approx. 172,000 standard cubic feet).

Conservation advocates

According to helium conservationists like Nobel laureate physicist Robert Coleman Richardson, writing in 2010, the free market price of helium has contributed to "wasteful" usage (e.g. for helium balloons). Prices in the 2000s had been lowered by the decision of the U.S. Congress to sell off the country's large helium stockpile by 2015. According to Richardson, the price needed to be multiplied by 20 to eliminate the excessive wasting of helium. In the 2012 Nuttall et al. paper titled "Stop squandering helium", it was also proposed to create an International Helium Agency that would build a sustainable market for "this precious commodity".

Applications

The largest single use of liquid helium is to cool the superconducting magnets in modern MRI scanners.

Estimated 2014 U.S. fractional helium use by category. Total use is 34 million cubic meters.

  Cryogenics (32%)

  Pressurizing and purging (18%)

  Welding (13%)

  Controlled atmospheres (18%)

  Leak detection (4%)

  Breathing mixtures (2%)

  Other (13%)

While balloons are perhaps the best-known use of helium, they are a minor part of all helium use. Helium is used for many purposes that require some of its unique properties, such as its low boiling point, low density, low solubility, high thermal conductivity, or inertness. Of the 2014 world helium total production of about 32 million kg (180 million standard cubic meters) helium per year, the largest use (about 32% of the total in 2014) is in cryogenic applications, most of which involves cooling the superconducting magnets in medical MRI scanners and NMR spectrometers. Other major uses were pressurizing and purging systems, welding, maintenance of controlled atmospheres, and leak detection. Other uses by category were relatively minor fractions.

Controlled atmospheres

Helium is used as a protective gas in growing silicon and germanium crystals, in titanium and zirconium production, and in gas chromatography, because it is inert. Because of its inertness, thermally and calorically perfect nature, high speed of sound, and high value of the heat capacity ratio, it is also useful in supersonic wind tunnels and impulse facilities.

Gas tungsten arc welding

Helium is used as a shielding gas in arc welding processes on materials that, at welding temperatures are contaminated and weakened by air or nitrogen. A number of inert shielding gases are used in gas tungsten arc welding, but helium is used instead of cheaper argon especially for welding materials that have higher heat conductivity, like aluminium or copper.

Minor uses

Industrial leak detection

A dual chamber helium leak detection machine

One industrial application for helium is leak detection. Because helium diffuses through solids three times faster than air, it is used as a tracer gas to detect leaks in high-vacuum equipment (such as cryogenic tanks) and high-pressure containers. The tested object is placed in a chamber, which is then evacuated and filled with helium. The helium that escapes through the leaks is detected by a sensitive device (helium mass spectrometer), even at the leak rates as small as 10⁻⁹ mbar·L/s (10⁻¹⁰ Pa·m³/s). The measurement procedure is normally automatic and is called helium integral test. A simpler procedure is to fill the tested object with helium and to manually search for leaks with a hand-held device.

Helium leaks through cracks should not be confused with gas permeation through a bulk material. While helium has documented permeation constants (thus a calculable permeation rate) through glasses, ceramics, and synthetic materials, inert gases such as helium will not permeate most bulk metals.

Flight

Because of its low density and incombustibility, helium is the gas of choice to fill airships such as the Goodyear blimp.

Because it is lighter than air, airships and balloons are inflated with helium for lift. While hydrogen gas is more buoyant and escapes permeating through a membrane at a lower rate, helium has the advantage of being non-flammable, and indeed fire-retardant. Another minor use is in rocketry, where helium is used as an ullage medium to backfill rocket propellant tanks in flight and to condense hydrogen and oxygen to make rocket fuel. It is also used to purge fuel and oxidizer from ground support equipment prior to launch and to pre-cool liquid hydrogen in space vehicles. For example, the Saturn V rocket used in the Apollo program needed about 370,000 cubic metres (13 million cubic feet) of helium to launch.

Minor commercial and recreational uses

Helium as a breathing gas has no narcotic properties, so helium mixtures such as trimix, heliox and heliair are used for deep diving to reduce the effects of narcosis, which worsen with increasing depth. As pressure increases with depth, the density of the breathing gas also increases, and the low molecular weight of helium is found to considerably reduce the effort of breathing by lowering the density of the mixture. This reduces the Reynolds number of flow, leading to a reduction of turbulent flow and an increase in laminar flow, which requires less breathing. At depths below 150 metres (490 ft) divers breathing helium-oxygen mixtures begin to experience tremors and a decrease in psychomotor function, symptoms of high-pressure nervous syndrome. This effect may be countered to some extent by adding an amount of narcotic gas such as hydrogen or nitrogen to a helium–oxygen mixture.

Helium–neon lasers, a type of low-powered gas laser producing a red beam, had various practical applications which included barcode readers and laser pointers, before they were almost universally replaced by cheaper diode lasers.

For its inertness and high thermal conductivity, neutron transparency, and because it does not form radioactive isotopes under reactor conditions, helium is used as a heat-transfer medium in some gas-cooled nuclear reactors.

Helium, mixed with a heavier gas such as xenon, is useful for thermoacoustic refrigeration due to the resulting high heat capacity ratio and low Prandtl number. The inertness of helium has environmental advantages over conventional refrigeration systems which contribute to ozone depletion or global warming.

Helium is also used in some hard disk drives.

Scientific uses

The use of helium reduces the distorting effects of temperature variations in the space between lenses in some telescopes due to its extremely low index of refraction. This method is especially used in solar telescopes where a vacuum tight telescope tube would be too heavy.

Helium is a commonly used carrier gas for gas chromatography.

The age of rocks and minerals that contain uranium and thorium can be estimated by measuring the level of helium with a process known as helium dating.

Helium at low temperatures is used in cryogenics and in certain cryogenic applications. As examples of applications, liquid helium is used to cool certain metals to the extremely low temperatures required for superconductivity, such as in superconducting magnets for magnetic resonance imaging. The Large Hadron Collider at CERN uses 96 metric tons of liquid helium to maintain the temperature at 1.9 K (−271.25 °C; −456.25 °F).

Medical uses

Helium was approved for medical use in the United States in April 2020 for humans and animals.

As a contaminant

While chemically inert, helium contamination impairs the operation of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) such that iPhones may fail.

Inhalation and safety

Effects

Neutral helium at standard conditions is non-toxic, plays no biological role and is found in trace amounts in human blood.

Effect of helium on a human voice

The effect of helium on a human voice

---

Problems playing this file? See media help.

The speed of sound in helium is nearly three times the speed of sound in air. Because the natural resonance frequency of a gas-filled cavity is proportional to the speed of sound in the gas, when helium is inhaled, a corresponding increase occurs in the resonant frequencies of the vocal tract, which is the amplifier of vocal sound. This increase in the resonant frequency of the amplifier (the vocal tract) gives increased amplification to the high-frequency components of the sound wave produced by the direct vibration of the vocal folds, compared to the case when the voice box is filled with air. When a person speaks after inhaling helium gas, the muscles that control the voice box still move in the same way as when the voice box is filled with air; therefore the fundamental frequency (sometimes called pitch) produced by direct vibration of the vocal folds does not change. However, the high-frequency-preferred amplification causes a change in timbre of the amplified sound, resulting in a reedy, duck-like vocal quality. The opposite effect, lowering resonant frequencies, can be obtained by inhaling a dense gas such as sulfur hexafluoride or xenon.

Hazards

Inhaling helium can be dangerous if done to excess, since helium is a simple asphyxiant and so displaces oxygen needed for normal respiration. Fatalities have been recorded, including a youth who suffocated in Vancouver in 2003 and two adults who suffocated in South Florida in 2006. In 1998, an Australian girl from Victoria fell unconscious and temporarily turned blue after inhaling the entire contents of a party balloon. Inhaling helium directly from pressurized cylinders or even balloon filling valves is extremely dangerous, as high flow rate and pressure can result in barotrauma, fatally rupturing lung tissue.

Death caused by helium is rare. The first media-recorded case was that of a 15-year-old girl from Texas who died in 1998 from helium inhalation at a friend's party; the exact type of helium death is unidentified.

In the United States, only two fatalities were reported between 2000 and 2004, including a man who died in North Carolina of barotrauma in 2002. A youth asphyxiated in Vancouver during 2003, and a 27-year-old man in Australia had an embolism after breathing from a cylinder in 2000. Since then, two adults asphyxiated in South Florida in 2006, and there were cases in 2009 and 2010, one of whom was a Californian youth who was found with a bag over his head, attached to a helium tank, and another teenager in Northern Ireland died of asphyxiation. At Eagle Point, Oregon a teenage girl died in 2012 from barotrauma at a party. A girl from Michigan died from hypoxia later in the year.

On February 4, 2015, it was revealed that, during the recording of their main TV show on January 28, a 12-year-old member (name withheld) of Japanese all-girl singing group 3B Junior suffered from air embolism, losing consciousness and falling into a coma as a result of air bubbles blocking the flow of blood to the brain after inhaling huge quantities of helium as part of a game. The incident was not made public until a week later. The staff of TV Asahi held an emergency press conference to communicate that the member had been taken to the hospital and is showing signs of rehabilitation such as moving eyes and limbs, but her consciousness has not yet been sufficiently recovered. Police have launched an investigation due to a neglect of safety measures.

The safety issues for cryogenic helium are similar to those of liquid nitrogen; its extremely low temperatures can result in cold burns, and the liquid-to-gas expansion ratio can cause explosions if no pressure-relief devices are installed. Containers of helium gas at 5 to 10 K should be handled as if they contain liquid helium due to the rapid and significant thermal expansion that occurs when helium gas at less than 10 K is warmed to room temperature.

At high pressures (more than about 20 atm or two MPa), a mixture of helium and oxygen (heliox) can lead to high-pressure nervous syndrome, a sort of reverse-anesthetic effect; adding a small amount of nitrogen to the mixture can alleviate the problem.

See also

• Abiogenic petroleum origin
• Helium-3 propulsion
• Leidenfrost effect
• Superfluid
• Tracer-gas leak testing method
• Hamilton Cady

Notes

1. A few authors dispute the placement of helium in the noble gas column, preferring to place it above beryllium with the alkaline earth metals. They do so on the grounds of helium's 1s² electron configuration, which is analogous to the ns² valence configurations of the alkaline earth metals, and furthermore point to some specific trends that are more regular if helium is placed in group 2. These tend to relate to kainosymmetry and the first-row anomaly: the first orbital of any type is unusually small, since unlike its higher analogues, it does not experience interelectronic repulsion from a smaller orbital of the same type. Because of this trend in the sizes of orbitals, a large difference in atomic radii between the first and second members of each main group is seen in groups 1 and 13–17: it exists between neon and argon, and between helium and beryllium, but not between helium and neon. This similarly affects the noble gases' boiling points and solubilities in water, where helium is too close to neon, and the large difference characteristic between the first two elements of a group appears only between neon and argon. Moving helium to group 2 makes this trend consistent in groups 2 and 18 as well, by making helium the first group 2 element and neon the first group 18 element: both exhibit the characteristic properties of a kainosymmetric first element of a group. However, the classification of helium with the other noble gases remains near-universal, as its extraordinary inertness is extremely close to that of the other light noble gases neon and argon.

References

1. "Standard Atomic Weights: Helium". CIAAW. 1983.
2. Prohaska, Thomas; Irrgeher, Johanna; Benefield, Jacqueline; Böhlke, John K.; Chesson, Lesley A.; Coplen, Tyler B.; Ding, Tiping; Dunn, Philip J. H.; Gröning, Manfred; Holden, Norman E.; Meijer, Harro A. J. (2022-05-04). "Standard atomic weights of the elements 2021 (IUPAC Technical Report)". Pure and Applied Chemistry. doi:10.1515/pac-2019-0603. ISSN 1365-3075.
3. Shuen-Chen Hwang, Robert D. Lein, Daniel A. Morgan (2005). "Noble Gases". Kirk Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. Wiley. pp. 343–383. doi:10.1002/0471238961.0701190508230114.a01.
4. Disodium helide, (Na⁺)₂He(e⁻)₂, has been synthesized at high pressure, see Dong, Xiao; Oganov, Artem R.; Goncharov, Alexander F.; Stavrou, Elissaios; Lobanov, Sergey; Saleh, Gabriele; Qian, Guang-Rui; Zhu, Qiang; Gatti, Carlo; Deringer, Volker L.; Dronskowski, Richard; Zhou, Xiang-Feng; Prakapenka, Vitali B.; Konôpková, Zuzana; Popov, Ivan A.; Boldyrev, Alexander I.; Wang, Hui-Tian (6 February 2017). "A stable compound of helium and sodium at high pressure". Nature Chemistry. 9 (5): 440–445. arXiv:1309.3827. Bibcode:2017NatCh...9..440D. doi:10.1038/nchem.2716. PMID 28430195. S2CID 20459726.
5. Magnetic susceptibility of the elements and inorganic compounds, in Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 81st edition, CRC press.
6. Weast, Robert (1984). CRC, Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. Boca Raton, Florida: Chemical Rubber Company Publishing. pp. E110. ISBN 0-8493-0464-4.
7. Kondev, F. G.; Wang, M.; Huang, W. J.; Naimi, S.; Audi, G. (2021). "The NUBASE2020 evaluation of nuclear properties" (PDF). Chinese Physics C. 45 (3): 030001. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddae.
8. Grochala, Wojciech (1 November 2017). "On the position of helium and neon in the Periodic Table of Elements". Foundations of Chemistry. 20 (2018): 191–207. doi:10.1007/s10698-017-9302-7.
9. Bent Weberg, Libby (18 January 2019). ""The" periodic table". Chemical & Engineering News. 97 (3). Retrieved 27 March 2020.
10. Grandinetti, Felice (23 April 2013). "Neon behind the signs". Nature Chemistry. 5 (2013): 438. Bibcode:2013NatCh...5..438G. doi:10.1038/nchem.1631. PMID 23609097.
11. Kurushkin, Mikhail (2020). "Helium's placement in the Periodic Table from a crystal structure viewpoint". IUCrJ. 7 (4): 577–578. Bibcode:2020IUCrJ...7..577K. doi:10.1107/S2052252520007769. PMC 7340260. PMID 32695406. Retrieved 19 June 2020.
12. Labarca, Martín; Srivaths, Akash (2016). "On the Placement of Hydrogen and Helium in the Periodic System: A New Approach". Bulgarian Journal of Science Education. 25 (4): 514–530. Archived from the original on 29 November 2021. Retrieved 19 June 2020.
13. Siekierski, S.; Burgess, J. (2002). Concise Chemistry of the Elements. Horwood. pp. 23–26. ISBN 978-1-898563-71-6.
14. Lewars, Errol G. (5 December 2008). Modeling Marvels: Computational Anticipation of Novel Molecules. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 69–71. ISBN 978-1-4020-6973-4. Archived from the original on 19 May 2016.
15. Rayet, G. (1868) "Analyse spectral des protubérances observées, pendant l'éclipse totale de Soleil visible le 18 août 1868, à la presqu'île de Malacca" (Spectral analysis of the protuberances observed during the total solar eclipse, seen on 18 August 1868, from the Malacca peninsula), Comptes rendus ... , 67 : 757–759. From p. 758: " ... je vis immédiatement une série de neuf lignes brillantes qui ... me semblent devoir être assimilées aux lignes principales du spectre solaire, B, D, E, b, une ligne inconnue, F, et deux lignes du groupe G." ( ... I saw immediately a series of nine bright lines that ... seemed to me should be classed as the principal lines of the solar spectrum, B, D, E, b, an unknown line, F, and two lines of the group G.)
16. Captain C. T. Haig (1868) "Account of spectroscopic observations of the eclipse of the sun, August 18th, 1868" Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 17 : 74–80. From p. 74: "I may state at once that I observed the spectra of two red flames close to each other, and in their spectra two broad bright bands quite sharply defined, one rose-madder and the other light golden."
17. Pogson filed his observations of the 1868 eclipse with the local Indian government, but his report wasn't published. (Biman B. Nath, The Story of Helium and the Birth of Astrophysics (New York, New York: Springer, 2013), p. 8.) Nevertheless, Lockyer quoted from his report. From p. 320 Archived 17 August 2018 at the Wayback Machine of Lockyer, J. Norman (1896) "The story of helium. Prologue," Nature, 53 : 319–322 : "Pogson, in referring to the eclipse of 1868, said that the yellow line was "at D, or near D." "
18. Lieutenant John Herschel (1868) "Account of the solar eclipse of 1868, as seen at Jamkandi in the Bombay Presidency," Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 17 : 104–120. From p. 113: As the moment of the total solar eclipse approached, " ... I recorded an increasing brilliancy in the spectrum in the neighborhood of D, so great in fact as to prevent any measurement of that line till an opportune cloud moderated the light. I am not prepared to offer any explanation of this." From p. 117: "I also consider that there can be no question that the ORANGE LINE was identical with D, so far as the capacity of the instrument to establish any such identity is concerned."
19. In his initial report to the French Academy of Sciences about the 1868 eclipse, Janssen made no mention of a yellow line in the solar spectrum. See:
    • Janssen (1868) "Indication de quelques-uns des résultats obtenus à Cocanada, pendant l'éclipse du mois d'août dernier, et à la suite de cette éclipse" (Information on some of the results obtained at Cocanada, during the eclipse of the month of last August, and following that eclipse), Comptes rendus ... , 67 : 838–839.
    • Wheeler M. Sears, Helium: The Disappearing Element (Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2015), p. 44.
    • Françoise Launay with Storm Dunlop, trans., The Astronomer Jules Janssen: A Globetrotter of Celestial Physics (Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2012), p. 45.
    However, subsequently, in an unpublished letter of 19 December 1868 to Charles Sainte-Claire Deville, Janssen asked Deville to inform the French Academy of Sciences that : "Several observers have claimed the bright D line as forming part of the spectrum of the prominences on 18 August. The bright yellow line did indeed lie very close to D, but the light was more refrangible [i.e., of shorter wavelength] than those of the D lines. My subsequent studies of the Sun have shown the accuracy of what I state here." (See: (Launay, 2012), p. 45.)
20. "Cleveite". Mindat.org. Retrieved 14 February 2020.
21. "Uraninite". Mindat.org. Retrieved 14 February 2020.
22. Rose, Melinda (October 2008). "Helium: Up, Up and Away?". Photonics Spectra. Archived from the original on 22 August 2010. Retrieved 27 February 2010. For a more authoritative but older 1996 pie chart showing U.S. helium use by sector, showing much the same result, see the chart reproduced in "Applications" section of this article.
23. Connor, Steve (23 August 2010). "Why the world is running out of helium". The Independent. London. Archived from the original on 27 September 2013. Retrieved 16 September 2013.
24. Siegel, Ethan (12 December 2012). "Why the World Will Run Out of Helium". Starts with a Bang. Scienceblogs.com. Archived from the original on 14 September 2013. Retrieved 16 September 2013.
25. Szondy, David (24 August 2015). "We may not be running out of helium after all". www.gizmag.com. Archived from the original on 25 March 2016. Retrieved 1 April 2016.
26. Sample, Ian (28 June 2016). "Huge helium gas find in east Africa averts medical shortage". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 29 June 2016. Retrieved 29 June 2016.
27. Kochhar, R. K. (1991). "French astronomers in India during the 17th – 19th centuries". Journal of the British Astronomical Association. 101 (2): 95–100. Bibcode:1991JBAA..101...95K.
28. Emsley, John (2001). Nature's Building Blocks. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 175–179. ISBN 978-0-19-850341-5.
29. Lockyer, J. N. (October 1868). "Notice of an observation of the spectrum of a solar prominence". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 17: 91–92. Bibcode:1868RSPS...17...91L. doi:10.1098/rspl.1868.0011. JSTOR 112357. S2CID 163097539. Retrieved 3 June 2018.
30. Hampel, Clifford A. (1968). The Encyclopedia of the Chemical Elements. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. pp. 256–268. ISBN 978-0-442-15598-8.
31. Harper, Douglas. "helium". Online Etymology Dictionary.
32. Thomson, William (August 3, 1871). "Inaugural Address of Sir William Thomson". Nature. 4 (92): 261–278 [268]. Bibcode:1871Natur...4..261.. doi:10.1038/004261a0. PMC 2070380. Archived from the original on December 2, 2016. Retrieved February 22, 2016. Frankland and Lockyer find the yellow prominences to give a very decided bright line not far from D, but hitherto not identified with any terrestrial flame. It seems to indicate a new substance, which they propose to call Helium
33. Jensen, William B. (2004). "Why Helium ends in "-ium"". Journal of Chemical Education. 81 (7): 944. Bibcode:2004JChEd..81..944J. doi:10.1021/ed081p944.
34. Palmieri, Luigi (1881). "La riga dell'Helium apparsa in una recente sublimazione vesuviana" [The line of helium appeared in a recently sublimated material [from Mt.] Vesuvius.]. Rendiconto dell'Accademia delle Scienze Fisiche e Matematiche (Naples, Italy). 20: 223. Archived from the original on 1 September 2018. Retrieved 1 May 2017. Raccolsi alcun tempo fa una sostanza amorfa di consistenza butirracea e di colore giallo sbiadato sublimata sull'orlo di una fumarola prossima alla bocca di eruzione. Saggiata questa sublimazione allo spettroscopio, ho ravvisato le righe del sodio e del potassio ed una lineare ben distinta che corrisponde esattamente alla D₃ che è quella dell'Helium. Do per ora il semplice annunzio del fatto, proponendomi di ritornare sopra questo argomento, dopo di aver sottoposta la sublimazione ad una analisi chimica. (I collected some time ago an amorphous substance having a buttery consistency and a faded yellow color which had sublimated on the rim of a fumarole near the mouth of the eruption. Having analyzed this sublimated substance with a spectroscope, I recognized the lines of sodium and potassium and a very distinct linear line which corresponds exactly to D₃, which is that of helium. For the present, I'm making a mere announcement of the fact, proposing to return to this subject after having subjected the sublimate to a chemical analysis.)
35. Kirk, Wendy L. "Cleveite [not Clevite] and helium". Museums & Collections Blog. University College London. Archived from the original on 18 October 2018. Retrieved 18 August 2017.
36. Ramsay, William (1895). "On a Gas Showing the Spectrum of Helium, the Reputed Cause of D₃, One of the Lines in the Coronal Spectrum. Preliminary Note". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 58 (347–352): 65–67. Bibcode:1895RSPS...58...65R. doi:10.1098/rspl.1895.0006. S2CID 129872109.
37. Ramsay, William (1895). "Helium, a Gaseous Constituent of Certain Minerals. Part I". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 58 (347–352): 81–89. Bibcode:1895RSPS...58...80R. doi:10.1098/rspl.1895.0010.
38. Ramsay, William (1895). "Helium, a Gaseous Constituent of Certain Minerals. Part II – Density". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 59 (1): 325–330. Bibcode:1895RSPS...59..325R. doi:10.1098/rspl.1895.0097. S2CID 96589261.
39. Lockyer, J. Norman (1895). "On the new gas obtained from uraninite. Preliminary note, part II". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 58 (347–352): 67–70. doi:10.1098/rspl.1895.0008.
40. See:
    • Crookes, William (1895). "The spectrum of the gas from clèveite". The Chemical News and Journal of Physical Science. 71 (1844): 151.
    • Crookes, William (1895). "The spectrum of helium". The Chemical News and Journal of Physical Science. 72 (1865): 87–89.
41. See:
    • Clève, P.T. (1895). "Sur la présence de l'hélium dans le clévéite" [On the presence of helium in cleveite]. Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l'Académie des sciences (in French). 120: 834.
    • English translation: Clève, P.T. (1895). "On the presence of helium in clèveite". The Chemical News and Journal of Physical Science. 71 (1849): 212.
    • Thorpe, T. E. (1895). "Terrestrial helium?". Nature. 51 (1329): 586.
    • Clève (1895). "Sur la densité de l'hélium" [On the density of helium]. Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l'Académie des sciences (in French). 120: 1212.
42. Langlet, N. A. (1895). "Das Atomgewicht des Heliums" [The atomic weight of helium]. Zeitschrift für Anorganische Chemie (in German). 10 (1): 289–292. doi:10.1002/zaac.18950100130.
43. Weaver, E.R. (1919). Circular of the Bureau of Standards No. 81: Bibliography of Scientific Literature Relating to Helium (PDF). Washington, D.C., USA: U.S. Government Printing Office. p. 6.
44. Hillebrand (1890) "On the occurrence of nitrogen in uraninite and on the composition of uraninite in general," Bulletin of the U.S. Geological Survey, no. 78, pp. 43–79.
45. Munday, Pat (1999). John A. Garraty; Mark C. Carnes (eds.). Biographical entry for W.F. Hillebrand (1853–1925), geochemist and U.S. Bureau of Standards administrator in American National Biography. Vol. 10–11. Oxford University Press. pp. 808–9, 227–8.
46. Rutherford, E.; Royds, T. (1908). "XXIV.Spectrum of the radium emanation". Philosophical Magazine. series 6. 16 (92): 313–317. doi:10.1080/14786440808636511.
47. Onnes, H. Kamerlingh (1908) "The liquefaction of helium," Communications from the Physical Laboratory at the University of Leiden, 9 (108) : 1–23.
48. van Delft, Dirk (2008). "Little cup of Helium, big Science" (PDF). Physics Today. 61 (3): 36–42. Bibcode:2008PhT....61c..36V. doi:10.1063/1.2897948. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 25, 2008. Retrieved 2008-07-20.
49. See:
    • Preliminary notice: Keesom, W. H. (17 July 1926) Letters to the Editor: "Solidification of helium," Nature, 118 : 81.
    • Preliminary notice: Keesom, W. H. (1926) "L'hélium solidifié," Archived 2016-10-22 at the Wayback Machine Comptes rendus ... , 183 : 26.
    • Keesom, W. H. (1926) "Solid Helium," Communications from the Physical Laboratory at the University of Leiden, 17 (184) .
50. "Coldest Cold". Time Inc. 1929-06-10. Archived from the original on 2008-12-06. Retrieved 2008-07-27.
51. Hoyer, Ulrich (1981). "Constitution of Atoms and Molecules". In Hoyer, Ulrich (ed.). Niels Bohr – Collected Works: Volume 2 – Work on Atomic Physics (1912–1917). Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company. pp. 103–316 (esp. pp. 116–122). ISBN 978-0720418002.
52. Kennedy, P. J. (1985). "A Short Biography". In French, A. P.; Kennedy, P. J. (eds.). Niels Bohr: A Centenary Volume. Harvard University Press. pp. 3–15. ISBN 978-0-674-62415-3.
53. Bohr, N. (1913). "On the constitution of atoms and molecules, part I" (PDF). Philosophical Magazine. 26 (151): 1–25. Bibcode:1913PMag...26....1B. doi:10.1080/14786441308634955. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2019-04-04. Retrieved 2017-12-27.
    Bohr, N. (1913). "On the constitution of atoms and molecules, part II: Systems Containing Only a Single Nucleus" (PDF). Philosophical Magazine. 26 (153): 476–502. Bibcode:1913PMag...26..476B. doi:10.1080/14786441308634993. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-12-15. Retrieved 2017-12-27.
    Bohr, N. (1913). "On the constitution of atoms and molecules, part III: Systems containing several nuclei". Philosophical Magazine. 26 (155): 857–875. Bibcode:1913PMag...26..857B. doi:10.1080/14786441308635031.
54. Robotti, Nadia (1983). "The Spectrum of ζ Puppis and the Historical Evolution of Empirical Data". Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences. 14 (1): 123–145. doi:10.2307/27757527. JSTOR 27757527.
55. Pickering, E. C. (1896). "Stars having peculiar spectra. New variable stars in Crux and Cygnus". Harvard College Observatory Circular. 12: 1–2. Bibcode:1896HarCi..12....1P. Also published as: Pickering, E. C.; Fleming, W. P. (1896). "Stars having peculiar spectra. New variable stars in Crux and Cygnus". Astrophysical Journal. 4: 369–370. Bibcode:1896ApJ.....4..369P. doi:10.1086/140291.
56. Wright, W. H. (1914). "The relation between the Wolf–Rayet stars and the planetary nebulae". Astrophysical Journal. 40: 466–472. Bibcode:1914ApJ....40..466W. doi:10.1086/142138.
57. Pickering, E. C. (1897). "Stars having peculiar spectra. New variable Stars in Crux and Cygnus". Astronomische Nachrichten. 142 (6): 87–90. Bibcode:1896AN....142...87P. doi:10.1002/asna.18971420605. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2019-08-24. Retrieved 2019-08-24.
58. Pickering, E. C. (1897). "The spectrum of zeta Puppis". Astrophysical Journal. 5: 92–94. Bibcode:1897ApJ.....5...92P. doi:10.1086/140312.
59. Lakatos, Imre (1980). "Bohr: A Research Programme Progressing on Inconsistent Foundations". In Worrall, John; Currie, Gregory (eds.). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge University Press. pp. 55–68. ISBN 9780521280310.
60. Fowler, A. (1912). "Observations of the Principal and other Series of Lines in the Spectrum of Hydrogen". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 73 (2): 62–63. Bibcode:1912MNRAS..73...62F. doi:10.1093/mnras/73.2.62.
61. Bohr, N. (1913). "The Spectra of Helium and Hydrogen". Nature. 92 (2295): 231–232. Bibcode:1913Natur..92..231B. doi:10.1038/092231d0. S2CID 11988018.
62. Fowler, A. (1913). "The Spectra of Helium and Hydrogen". Nature. 92 (2291): 95–96. Bibcode:1913Natur..92...95F. doi:10.1038/092095b0. S2CID 3972599.
63. Fowler, A. (1913). "Reply to: The Spectra of Helium and Hydrogen". Nature. 92 (2295): 232–233. Bibcode:1913Natur..92..232F. doi:10.1038/092232a0. S2CID 3981817.
64. Bohr, N. (1915). "The Spectra of Hydrogen and Helium". Nature. 95 (6–7): 6–7. Bibcode:1915Natur..95....6B. doi:10.1038/095006a0. S2CID 3947572.
65. Kapitza, P. (1938). "Viscosity of Liquid Helium below the λ-Point". Nature. 141 (3558): 74. Bibcode:1938Natur.141...74K. doi:10.1038/141074a0. S2CID 3997900.
66. Osheroff, D. D.; Richardson, R. C.; Lee, D. M. (1972). "Evidence for a New Phase of Solid He³". Phys. Rev. Lett. 28 (14): 885–888. Bibcode:1972PhRvL..28..885O. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.28.885. S2CID 89609083.
67. Vignos, James H.; Fairbank, Henry A. (1961-03-15). "New Solid Phase in ${\mathrm{He}}^{4}$". Physical Review Letters. 6 (6): 265–267. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.6.265.
68. McFarland, D. F. (1903). "Composition of Gas from a Well at Dexter, Kan". Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science. 19: 60–62. doi:10.2307/3624173. JSTOR 3624173.
69. "Discovery of Helium in Natural Gas at the University of Kansas". National Historic Chemical Landmarks. American Chemical Society. Archived from the original on 2014-02-26. Retrieved 2014-02-21.
70. Cady, H. P.; McFarland, D. F. (1906). "Helium in Natural Gas". Science. 24 (611): 344. Bibcode:1906Sci....24..344D. doi:10.1126/science.24.611.344. PMID 17772798. S2CID 27441003.
71. Cady, H. P.; McFarland, D. F. (1906). "Helium in Kansas Natural Gas". Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science. 20: 80–81. doi:10.2307/3624645. JSTOR 3624645.
72. Emme, Eugene M. comp., ed. (1961). "Aeronautics and Astronautics Chronology, 1920–1924". Aeronautics and Astronautics: An American Chronology of Science and Technology in the Exploration of Space, 1915–1960. Washington, D.C.: NASA. pp. 11–19. Archived from the original on 2019-07-14. Retrieved 2006-10-27.
73. Hilleret, N. (1999). "Leak Detection" (PDF). In S. Turner (ed.). CERN Accelerator School, vacuum technology: proceedings: Scanticon Conference Centre, Snekersten, Denmark, 28 May – 3 June 1999. Geneva, Switzerland: CERN. pp. 203–212. doi:10.5170/CERN-1999-005.203. At the origin of the helium leak detection method was the Manhattan Project and the unprecedented leak-tightness requirements needed by the uranium enrichment plants. The required sensitivity needed for the leak checking led to the choice of a mass spectrometer designed by Dr. A.O.C. Nier tuned on the helium mass.
74. Williamson, John G. (1968). "Energy for Kansas". Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science. 71 (4): 432–438. doi:10.2307/3627447. JSTOR 3627447.
75. "Conservation Helium Sale" (PDF). Federal Register. 70 (193): 58464. 2005-10-06. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2008-10-31. Retrieved 2008-07-20.
76. Stwertka, Albert (1998). Guide to the Elements: Revised Edition. New York; Oxford University Press, p. 24. ISBN 0-19-512708-0
77. Pub. L. 104–273: Helium Privatization Act of 1996 (text) (PDF)
78. Executive Summary. nap.edu. 2000. doi:10.17226/9860. ISBN 978-0-309-07038-6. Archived from the original on 2008-03-27. Retrieved 2008-07-20.
79. Mullins, P. V.; Goodling, R. M. (1951). Helium. Bureau of Mines / Minerals yearbook 1949. pp. 599–602. Archived from the original on 2008-12-06. Retrieved 2008-07-20.
80. "Helium End User Statistic" (PDF). U.S. Geological Survey. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2008-09-21. Retrieved 2008-07-20.
81. Smith, E. M.; Goodwin, T. W.; Schillinger, J. (2003). "Challenges to the Worldwide Supply of Helium in the Next Decade". Advances in Cryogenic Engineering. 49. A (710): 119–138. Bibcode:2004AIPC..710..119S. doi:10.1063/1.1774674. S2CID 109060534.
82. Kaplan, Karen H. (June 2007). "Helium shortage hampers research and industry". Physics Today. 60 (6). American Institute of Physics: 31–32. Bibcode:2007PhT....60f..31K. doi:10.1063/1.2754594.
83. Basu, Sourish (October 2007). Yam, Philip (ed.). "Updates: Into Thin Air". Scientific American. Vol. 297, no. 4. Scientific American, Inc. p. 18. Archived from the original on 2008-12-06. Retrieved 2008-08-04.
84. Newcomb, Tim (21 August 2012). "There's a Helium Shortage On—and It's Affecting More than Just Balloons". Time. Archived from the original on 29 December 2013. Retrieved 2013-09-16.
85. "Air Liquide | the world leader in gases, technologies and services for Industry and Health". 19 February 2015. Archived from the original on 2014-09-14. Retrieved 2015-05-25. Air Liquide Press Release.
86. "Middle East turmoil is disrupting a vital resource for nuclear energy, space flight and birthday balloons". washingtonpost.com. 26 June 2017. Archived from the original on 26 June 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
87. Cockerill, Rob (25 December 2014). "2015 – What lies ahead? Part 1". Gasworld. Archived from the original on 2015-01-17. Retrieved 15 September 2021.
88. "Will Air Products' (APD) Earnings Surprise Estimates in Q2? - Analyst Blog". NASDAQ.com. April 28, 2015. Archived from the original on July 15, 2019. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
89. Watkins, Thayer. "The Old Quantum Physics of Niels Bohr and the Spectrum of Helium: A Modified Version of the Bohr Model". San Jose State University. Archived from the original on 2009-05-26. Retrieved 2009-06-24.
90. Parker, M. C.; Jeynes, C.; Catford, W. N. (2022). "Halo Properties in Helium Nuclei from the Perspective of Geometrical Thermodynamics". Annalen der Physik. 534 (2100278). Bibcode:2022AnP...53400278P. doi:10.1002/andp.202100278.
91. Coc, A.; Vangioni, E. (2014). "The triple-alpha reaction and the A = 8 gap in BBN and Population III stars" (PDF). Memorie della Società Astronomica Italiana. 85: 124–129. Bibcode:2014MmSAI..85..124C.
92. Pitrou, C.; Coc, A.; Uzan, J.-P.; Vangioni, E. (2018). "Precision big bang nucleosynthesis with improved Helium-4 predictions". Physics Reports. 754: 1–66. arXiv:1801.08023. Bibcode:2018PhR...754....1P. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.04.005.
93. Vangioni-Flam, E.; Cassé, M. (1999). "Cosmic lithium-beryllium-boron story". Astrophysics and Space Science. 265: 77–86. arXiv:astro-ph/9902073. Bibcode:1999Ap&SS.265...77V. doi:10.1023/A:1002197712862. S2CID 10627727.
94. Hsyu, T.; Cooke, R. J.; Prochaska, J. X.; Bolte, M. (2020). "The PHLEK Survey: A New Determination of the Primordial Helium Abundance". The Astrophysical Journal. 896 (77): 77. arXiv:2005.12290. Bibcode:2020ApJ...896...77H. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab91af.
95. Lewars, Errol G. (2008). Modelling Marvels. Springer. pp. 70–71. Bibcode:2008moma.book.....L. ISBN 978-1-4020-6972-7.
96. Weiss, Ray F. (1971). "Solubility of helium and neon in water and seawater". J. Chem. Eng. Data. 16 (2): 235–241. doi:10.1021/je60049a019.
97. Scharlin, P.; Battino, R.; Silla, E.; Tuñón, I.; Pascual-Ahuir, J. L. (1998). "Solubility of gases in water: Correlation between solubility and the number of water molecules in the first solvation shell". Pure and Applied Chemistry. 70 (10): 1895–1904. doi:10.1351/pac199870101895. S2CID 96604119.
98. Stone, Jack A.; Stejskal, Alois (2004). "Using helium as a standard of refractive index: correcting errors in a gas refractometer". Metrologia. 41 (3): 189–197. Bibcode:2004Metro..41..189S. doi:10.1088/0026-1394/41/3/012. S2CID 250809634.
99. Buhler, F.; Axford, W. I.; Chivers, H. J. A.; Martin, K. (1976). "Helium isotopes in an aurora". J. Geophys. Res. 81 (1): 111–115. Bibcode:1976JGR....81..111B. doi:10.1029/JA081i001p00111.
100. Lide, D. R., ed. (2005). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (86th ed.). Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. p. 6-120. ISBN 0-8493-0486-5.
101. Hohenberg, P. C.; Martin, P. C. (2000). "Microscopic Theory of Superfluid Helium". Annals of Physics. 281 (1–2): 636–705 12091211. Bibcode:2000AnPhy.281..636H. doi:10.1006/aphy.2000.6019.
102. Warner, Brent. "Introduction to Liquid Helium". NASA. Archived from the original on 2005-09-01. Retrieved 2007-01-05.
103. Fairbank, H. A.; Lane, C. T. (1949). "Rollin Film Rates in Liquid Helium". Physical Review. 76 (8): 1209–1211. Bibcode:1949PhRv...76.1209F. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.76.1209.
104. Rollin, B. V.; Simon, F. (1939). "On the 'film' phenomenon of liquid helium II". Physica. 6 (2): 219–230. Bibcode:1939Phy.....6..219R. doi:10.1016/S0031-8914(39)80013-1.
105. Ellis, Fred M. (2005). "Third sound". Wesleyan Quantum Fluids Laboratory. Archived from the original on 2007-06-21. Retrieved 2008-07-23.
106. Bergman, D. (1949). "Hydrodynamics and Third Sound in Thin He II Films". Physical Review. 188 (1): 370–384. Bibcode:1969PhRv..188..370B. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.188.370.
107. "Solid Helium". Department of Physics University of Alberta. 2005-10-05. Archived from the original on May 31, 2008. Retrieved 2008-07-20.
108. Lide, D. R., ed. (2005). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (86th ed.). Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. ISBN 0-8493-0486-5.
109. Grilly, E. R. (1973). "Pressure-volume-temperature relations in liquid and solid 4He". Journal of Low Temperature Physics. 11 (1–2): 33–52. Bibcode:1973JLTP...11...33G. doi:10.1007/BF00655035. S2CID 189850188.
110. Henshaw, D. B. (1958). "Structure of Solid Helium by Neutron Diffraction". Physical Review Letters. 109 (2): 328–330. Bibcode:1958PhRv..109..328H. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.109.328.
111. Pinceaux, J.-P.; Maury, J.-P.; Besson, J.-M. (1979). "Solidification of helium, at room temperature under high pressure" (PDF). Journal de Physique Lettres. 40 (13): 307–308. doi:10.1051/jphyslet:019790040013030700. S2CID 40164915.
112. Keller, William E. (1969). "Compressed He3 and He4". Helium-3 and Helium-4. Boston, MA: Springer US. pp. 347–404. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-6485-4_9. ISBN 978-1-4899-6232-4.
113. Weiss, Achim. "Elements of the past: Big Bang Nucleosynthesis and observation". Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics. Archived from the original on 2010-07-29. Retrieved 2008-06-23.; Coc, Alain; Vangioni-Flam, Elisabeth; Descouvemont, Pierre; Adahchour, Abderrahim; Angulo, Carmen (2004). "Updated Big Bang Nucleosynthesis confronted to WMAP observations and to the Abundance of Light Elements". Astrophysical Journal. 600 (2): 544–552. arXiv:astro-ph/0309480. Bibcode:2004ApJ...600..544C. doi:10.1086/380121. S2CID 16276658.
114. Anderson, Don L.; Foulger, G. R.; Meibom, A. (2006-09-02). "Helium Fundamentals". MantlePlumes.org. Archived from the original on 2007-02-08. Retrieved 2008-07-20.
115. Novick, Aaron (1947). "Half-Life of Tritium". Physical Review. 72 (10): 972. Bibcode:1947PhRv...72..972N. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.72.972.2.
116. Zastenker, G. N.; Salerno, E.; Buehler, F.; Bochsler, P.; Bassi, M.; Agafonov, Yu. N.; Eisomont, N. A.; Khrapchenkov, V. V.; et al. (2002). "Isotopic Composition and Abundance of Interstellar Neutral Helium Based on Direct Measurements". Astrophysics. 45 (2): 131–142. Bibcode:2002Ap.....45..131Z. doi:10.1023/A:1016057812964. S2CID 116957905.
117. "Lunar Mining of Helium-3". Fusion Technology Institute of the University of Wisconsin-Madison. 2007-10-19. Archived from the original on 2010-06-09. Retrieved 2008-07-09.
118. Slyuta, E. N.; Abdrakhimov, A. M.; Galimov, E. M. (2007). "The estimation of helium-3 probable reserves in lunar regolith" (PDF). Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (1338): 2175. Bibcode:2007LPI....38.2175S. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2008-07-05. Retrieved 2008-07-20.
119. Hedman, Eric R. (2006-01-16). "A fascinating hour with Gerald Kulcinski". The Space Review. Archived from the original on 2011-01-09. Retrieved 2008-07-20.
120. Zu, H.; Dai, W.; de Waele, A.T.A.M. (2022). "Development of Dilution refrigerators – A review". Cryogenics. 121. doi:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2021.103390. ISSN 0011-2275. S2CID 244005391.
121. Holman, Jack P. (2002). Heat Transfer (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. pp. 600–606. ISBN 9780072406559.
122. Incropera, Frank P.; Dewitt, David P.; Bergman, Theodore L.; Lavigne, Adrienne S. (2007). Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. pp. 941–950. ISBN 9780471457282.
123. Hiby, Julius W. (1939). "Massenspektrographische Untersuchungen an Wasserstoff- und Heliumkanalstrahlen (H⁺
     ₃, H⁻
     ₂, HeH⁺
     , HeD⁺
     , He⁻
     )". Annalen der Physik. 426 (5): 473–487. Bibcode:1939AnP...426..473H. doi:10.1002/andp.19394260506.
124. Friedrich, Bretislav (8 April 2013). "A Fragile Union Between Li and He Atoms". Physics. Vol. 6. p. 42. Bibcode:2013PhyOJ...6...42F. doi:10.1103/Physics.6.42. hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-000E-F3CF-5. Archived from the original on 29 August 2017. Retrieved 24 August 2019.
125. Wong, Ming Wah (2000). "Prediction of a Metastable Helium Compound: HHeF". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 122 (26): 6289–6290. Bibcode:2000JAChS.122.6289W. doi:10.1021/ja9938175.
126. Grochala, W. (2009). "On Chemical Bonding Between Helium and Oxygen". Polish Journal of Chemistry. 83: 87–122.
127. "Collapse of helium's chemical nobility predicted by Polish chemist" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-03-19. Retrieved 2009-05-15.
128. Saunders, Martin; Jiménez-Vázquez, Hugo A.; Cross, R. James; Poreda, Robert J. (1993). "Stable Compounds of Helium and Neon: He@C₆₀ and Ne@C₆₀". Science. 259 (5100): 1428–1430. Bibcode:1993Sci...259.1428S. doi:10.1126/science.259.5100.1428. PMID 17801275. S2CID 41794612.
129. Saunders, Martin; Jiménez-Vázquez, Hugo A.; Cross, R. James; Mroczkowski, Stanley; Freedberg, Darón I.; Anet, Frank A. L. (1994). "Probing the interior of fullerenes by ³He NMR spectroscopy of endohedral ³He@C₆₀ and ³He@C₇₀". Nature. 367 (6460): 256–258. Bibcode:1994Natur.367..256S. doi:10.1038/367256a0. S2CID 4273677.
130. Vos, W. L.; Finger, L. W.; Hemley, R. J.; Hu, J. Z.; Mao, H. K.; Schouten, J. A. (1992). "A high-pressure van der Waals compound in solid nitrogen-helium mixtures". Nature. 358 (6381): 46–48. Bibcode:1992Natur.358...46V. doi:10.1038/358046a0. S2CID 4313676.
131. Dong, Xiao; Oganov, Artem R.; Goncharov, Alexander F.; Stavrou, Elissaios; Lobanov, Sergey; Saleh, Gabriele; Qian, Guang-Rui; Zhu, Qiang; Gatti, Carlo; Deringer, Volker L.; Dronskowski, Richard; Zhou, Xiang-Feng; Prakapenka, Vitali B.; Konôpková, Zuzana; Popov, Ivan A.; Boldyrev, Alexander I.; Wang, Hui-Tian (2017). "A stable compound of helium and sodium at high pressure". Nature Chemistry. 9 (5): 440–445. arXiv:1309.3827. Bibcode:2017NatCh...9..440D. doi:10.1038/nchem.2716. ISSN 1755-4330. PMID 28430195. S2CID 20459726.
132. Oliver, B. M.; Bradley, James G. (1984). "Helium concentration in the Earth's lower atmosphere". Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 48 (9): 1759–1767. Bibcode:1984GeCoA..48.1759O. doi:10.1016/0016-7037(84)90030-9.
133. "The Atmosphere: Introduction". JetStream – Online School for Weather. National Weather Service. 2007-08-29. Archived from the original on January 13, 2008. Retrieved 2008-07-12.
134. Lie-Svendsen, Ø.; Rees, M. H. (1996). "Helium escape from the terrestrial atmosphere: The ion outflow mechanism". Journal of Geophysical Research. 101 (A2): 2435–2444. Bibcode:1996JGR...101.2435L. doi:10.1029/95JA02208.
135. Strobel, Nick (2007). "Atmospheres". Nick Strobel's Astronomy Notes. Archived from the original on 2010-09-19. Retrieved 2007-09-25.
136. G. Brent Dalrymple. "How Good Are Those Young-Earth Arguments?". Archived from the original on 2011-06-07. Retrieved 2011-02-13.
137. "Pitchblende". Mindat.org. Retrieved 14 February 2020.
138. "Monazite". Mindat.org. Retrieved 14 February 2020.
139. "Monazite-(Ce)". Mindat.org. Retrieved 14 February 2020.
140. Cook, Melvine A. (1957). "Where is the Earth's Radiogenic Helium?". Nature. 179 (4552): 213. Bibcode:1957Natur.179..213C. doi:10.1038/179213a0. S2CID 4297697.
141. Aldrich, L. T.; Nier, Alfred O. (1948). "The Occurrence of He³ in Natural Sources of Helium". Phys. Rev. 74 (11): 1590–1594. Bibcode:1948PhRv...74.1590A. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.74.1590.
142. Morrison, P.; Pine, J. (1955). "Radiogenic Origin of the Helium Isotopes in Rock". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 62 (3): 71–92. Bibcode:1955NYASA..62...71M. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1955.tb35366.x. S2CID 85015694.
143. Zartman, R. E.; Wasserburg, G. J.; Reynolds, J. H. (1961). "Helium Argon and Carbon in Natural Gases" (PDF). Journal of Geophysical Research. 66 (1): 277–306. Bibcode:1961JGR....66..277Z. doi:10.1029/JZ066i001p00277. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-08-09. Retrieved 2019-01-29.
144. Broadhead, Ronald F. (2005). "Helium in New Mexico—geology distribution resource demand and exploration possibilities" (PDF). New Mexico Geology. 27 (4): 93–101. doi:10.58799/NMG-v27n4.93. S2CID 29360086. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-03-30. Retrieved 2008-07-21.
145. "Helium" (PDF). Mineral Commodity Summaries. U.S. geological survey. January 2021. Retrieved 12 February 2022.
146. "Press release: The unbearable lightness of helium..." European Association of Geochemistry. Archived from the original on 2015-09-06. Retrieved 5 March 2017.
147. Rom, Zoë (2024-11-18). "How a dwindling helium supply is impacting public land management". High Country News. Retrieved 2024-11-24.
148. Winter, Mark (2008). "Helium: the essentials". University of Sheffield. Archived from the original on 2008-07-14. Retrieved 2008-07-14.
149. Cai, Z.; et al. (2007). Modelling Helium Markets (PDF). University of Cambridge. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-03-26. Retrieved 2008-07-14.
150. Helium (PDF). Mineral Commodity Summaries. U.S. Geological Survey. 2009. pp. 74–75. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2009-08-14. Retrieved 2009-12-19.
151. "Air Liquide and Linde in Helium Hunt as Texas Reserves Dry Up". Bloomberg. 2014. Archived from the original on 2017-03-10. Retrieved 2017-03-07.
152. Briggs, Helen (28 June 2016). "Helium discovery a 'game-changer'". BBC News. Archived from the original on 28 June 2016. Retrieved 2016-06-28.
153. Chen, Stephen (28 Jul 2020). "China opens first large-scale helium plant as it tries to reduce reliance on US imports". South China Morning Post. Beijing, China. Retrieved 28 Jul 2020.
154. Pierce, A. P., Gott, G. B., and Mytton, J. W. (1964). "Uranium and Helium in the Panhandle Gas Field Texas, and Adjacent Areas", Geological Survey Professional Paper 454-G, Washington:US Government Printing Office
155. "Responsible Helium Administration and Stewardship Act (H.R. 527)". House Committee on Natural Resources. Committee on Natural Resources United States House of Representatives. Archived from the original on 2017-03-06. Retrieved 5 March 2017.
156. Fresne, Patrick (2023-07-23). "When a Rush Begins: A Field Guide to the Helium Hopefuls of the United States". Gold and Revolution. Retrieved 2023-07-30.
157. Belyakov, V. P.; Durgar'yan, S. G.; Mirzoyan, B. A. (1981). "Membrane technology—A new trend in industrial gas separation". Chemical and Petroleum Engineering. 17 (1): 19–21. Bibcode:1981CPE....17...19B. doi:10.1007/BF01245721. S2CID 109199653.
158. Committee on the Impact of Selling, Table 4.2 Archived 2014-09-10 at the Wayback Machine
159. Committee on the Impact of Selling, see page 40 Archived 2014-05-29 at the Wayback Machine for the estimate of total theoretical helium production by neon and liquid air plants
160. Dee, P. I.; Walton E. T. S. (1933). "A Photographic Investigation of the Transmutation of Lithium and Boron by Protons and of Lithium by Ions of the Heavy Isotope of Hydrogen". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 141 (845): 733–742. Bibcode:1933RSPSA.141..733D. doi:10.1098/rspa.1933.0151. S2CID 96565428.
161. Nuttall, William J.; Clarke, Richard H.; Glowacki, Bartek A. (2012). "Resources: Stop squandering helium". Nature. 485 (7400): 573–575. Bibcode:2012Natur.485..573N. doi:10.1038/485573a. PMID 22660302. S2CID 10351068.
162. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey (2015). "Helium" (PDF). Mineral Commodity Summaries 2014. pp. 72–73. Archived from the original on 2014-04-04. Retrieved 2014-05-31.
163. Helium sell-off risks future supply Archived 2012-06-10 at the Wayback Machine, Michael Banks, Physics World, 27 January 2010. accessed February 27, 2010.
164. Beckwith, I. E.; Miller, C. G. (1990). "Aerothermodynamics and Transition in High-Speed Wind Tunnels at Nasa Langley". Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. 22 (1): 419–439. Bibcode:1990AnRFM..22..419B. doi:10.1146/annurev.fl.22.010190.002223.
165. Morris, C.I. (2001). Shock Induced Combustion in High Speed Wedge Flows (PDF). Stanford University Thesis. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-03-04.
166. Considine, Glenn D., ed. (2005). "Helium". Van Nostrand's Encyclopedia of Chemistry. Wiley-Interscience. pp. 764–765. ISBN 978-0-471-61525-5.
167. Hablanian, M. H. (1997). High-vacuum technology: a practical guide. CRC Press. p. 493. ISBN 978-0-8247-9834-5.
168. Ekin, Jack W. (2006). Experimental Techniques for Low-Temperature measurements. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-857054-7.
169. Fowler, B.; Ackles, K. N.; G, Porlier (1985). "Effects of inert gas narcosis on behavior—a critical review". Undersea Biomedical Research. 12 (4): 369–402. PMID 4082343. Archived from the original on 2010-12-25. Retrieved 2008-06-27.
170. Thomas, J. R. (1976). "Reversal of nitrogen narcosis in rats by helium pressure". Undersea Biomed. Res. 3 (3): 249–59. PMID 969027. Archived from the original on 2008-12-06. Retrieved 2008-08-06.
171. Butcher, Scott J.; Jones, Richard L.; Mayne, Jonathan R.; Hartley, Timothy C.; Petersen, Stewart R. (2007). "Impaired exercise ventilatory mechanics with the self-contained breathing apparatus are improved with heliox". European Journal of Applied Physiology. 101 (6): 659–69. doi:10.1007/s00421-007-0541-5. PMID 17701048. S2CID 7311649.
172. "Heliox21". Linde Gas Therapeutics. 27 January 2009. Archived from the original on 10 September 2011. Retrieved 13 April 2011.
173. Hunger, W. L. Jr.; Bennett, P. B. (1974). "The causes, mechanisms and prevention of the high pressure nervous syndrome". Undersea Biomed. Res. 1 (1): 1–28. ISSN 0093-5387. OCLC 2068005. PMID 4619860. Archived from the original on 2010-12-25. Retrieved 2008-04-07.
174. Rostain, J. C.; Gardette-Chauffour, M. C.; Lemaire, C.; Naquet, R. (1988). "Effects of a H₂-He-O₂ mixture on the HPNS up to 450 msw". Undersea Biomed. Res. 15 (4): 257–70. OCLC 2068005. PMID 3212843. Archived from the original on 2008-12-06. Retrieved 2008-06-24.
175. Belcher, James R.; Slaton, William V.; Raspet, Richard; Bass, Henry E.; Lightfoot, Jay (1999). "Working gases in thermoacoustic engines". The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 105 (5): 2677–2684. Bibcode:1999ASAJ..105.2677B. doi:10.1121/1.426884. PMID 10335618.
176. Makhijani, Arjun; Gurney, Kevin (1995). Mending the Ozone Hole: Science, Technology, and Policy. MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-13308-1.
177. Gallagher, Sean (November 4, 2013). "HGST balloons disk capacity with helium-filled 6TB drive". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on July 7, 2017. Retrieved June 14, 2017.
178. Jakobsson, H. (1997). "Simulations of the dynamics of the Large Earth-based Solar Telescope". Astronomical & Astrophysical Transactions. 13 (1): 35–46. Bibcode:1997A&AT...13...35J. doi:10.1080/10556799708208113.
179. Engvold, O.; Dunn, R.B.; Smartt, R. N.; Livingston, W. C. (1983). "Tests of vacuum VS. helium in a solar telescope". Applied Optics. 22 (1): 10–12. Bibcode:1983ApOpt..22...10E. doi:10.1364/AO.22.000010. PMID 20401118.
180. "LHC: Facts and Figures" (PDF). CERN. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-06. Retrieved 2008-04-30.
181. "Helium, USP: FDA-Approved Drugs". U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Retrieved 30 April 2020.
182. "FDA approval letter" (PDF). 14 April 2020. Retrieved 30 April 2020.
183. Oberhaus, Daniel (30 October 2018). "Why a Helium Leak Disabled Every iPhone in a Medical Facility". Motherboard. Vice Media. Archived from the original on 1 November 2018. Retrieved 31 October 2018.
184. Ackerman, M. J.; Maitland, G. (1975). "Calculation of the relative speed of sound in a gas mixture". Undersea Biomed Res. 2 (4): 305–10. PMID 1226588. Archived from the original on 2011-01-27. Retrieved 2008-08-09.
185. "Why does helium make your voice squeaky?". 14 July 2000. Archived from the original on 24 March 2013. Retrieved 2013-06-08.
186. Grassberger, Martin; Krauskopf, Astrid (2007). "Suicidal asphyxiation with helium: Report of three cases Suizid mit Helium Gas: Bericht über drei Fälle". Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift (in German and English). 119 (9–10): 323–325. doi:10.1007/s00508-007-0785-4. PMID 17571238. S2CID 22894287.
187. Montgomery B.; Hayes S. (2006-06-03). "2 found dead under deflated balloon". Tampa Bay Times. Archived from the original on 2013-12-30. Retrieved 2013-12-29.
188. "Two students die after breathing helium". CBC. 4 June 2006. Archived from the original on 31 December 2013. Retrieved 30 December 2013.
189. "Helium inhalation – it's no laughing matter – Article courtesy of BOC Gases". Balloon Artists & Suppliers Association of Australasia Ltd. Archived from the original on 2014-01-14. Retrieved 2014-01-03.
190. "Dangers of Helium Inhalation". Lou's Balloons. Archived from the original on 2014-01-04.
191. "Helium Gas Safety & Data Sheet". bouncetime. Archived from the original on 2015-04-22. Retrieved 2014-01-03.
192. Engber, Daniel (2006-06-13). "Stay Out of That Balloon!". Slate.com. Archived from the original on 2011-10-20. Retrieved 2008-07-14.
193. Josefson, D. (2000). "Imitating Mickey Mouse can be dangerous". BMJ: British Medical Journal. 320 (7237): 732. PMC 1117755. PMID 10720344.
194. "Teen Dies After Inhaling Helium". KTLA News. RIVERSIDE: ktla.com. January 6, 2010. Archived from the original on January 9, 2012. Retrieved 2010-11-19.
195. "Tributes to 'helium death' teenager from Newtownabbey". BBC Online. 19 November 2010. Archived from the original on 20 November 2010. Retrieved 2010-11-19.
196. Mather, Kate (24 February 2012). "Parents of Eagle Point girl who died from inhaling helium hope to save others from same fate". The Oregonian. Archived from the original on 6 December 2013. Retrieved 2013-06-08.
197. Barnard, Jeff (22 February 2012). "Ashley Long, Oregon Teenager, Dies After Inhaling Helium at Wild Party (VIDEO)". Huffington Post. Archived from the original on 31 December 2013. Retrieved 30 December 2013.
198. Barnard, Jeff (23 February 2012). "Teen girl dies after inhaling helium at party". Today. AP. Archived from the original on 2013-12-30. Retrieved 2013-12-30.
199. The Oxford Leader Newspaper, Sherman Publications, Inc., December 3, 2012.
200. "テレ朝事故で分かったヘリウム変声缶の危険性 意識を失うケースの大半が子ども" (in Japanese). 5 February 2015. Archived from the original on 5 February 2015. Retrieved 2015-02-05.
201. Rayman, Noah (5 February 2015). "J-Pop Teen Star Left in Coma After Inhaling Helium for TV Stunt". Time. Archived from the original on 5 February 2015. Retrieved 2015-02-06.
202. "アイドルが収録中に倒れ病院搬送 テレ朝、ヘリウムガス吸引" (in Japanese). 4 April 2015. Archived from the original on 4 February 2015. Retrieved 2015-02-04.
     "テレビ番組収録中、12歳アイドルが意識失い救急搬送 ヘリウムガスが原因か" (in Japanese). 4 February 2015. Archived from the original on 4 February 2015. Retrieved 2015-02-04.
     "テレ朝謝罪、12歳アイドルがヘリウム吸い救急搬送" (in Japanese). 4 February 2015. Archived from the original on 2015-02-04. Retrieved 2015-02-04.
     "3b Junior idol in coma after inhaling helium on TV Asahi program". 4 February 2015. Archived from the original on 4 February 2015. Retrieved 2015-02-04.
     "アイドル救急搬送騒動で制作会社が実績削除の不可解" (in Japanese). 4 February 2015. Archived from the original on 4 February 2015. Retrieved 2015-02-04.
203. "Japanese child star in coma after helium stunt goes wrong". BBC. 5 February 2015. Archived from the original on 5 February 2015. Retrieved 2015-02-06.
204. Rostain J.C.; Lemaire C.; Gardette-Chauffour M.C.; Doucet J.; Naquet R. (1983). "Estimation of human susceptibility to the high-pressure nervous syndrome". J Appl Physiol. 54 (4): 1063–70. doi:10.1152/jappl.1983.54.4.1063. PMID 6853282.

Bibliography

• Bureau of Mines (1967). Minerals yearbook mineral fuels Year 1965. Vol. II. U. S. Government Printing Office.
• Committee on the Impact of Selling the Federal Helium Reserve; Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications; Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems; National Research Council (2000). The Impact of Selling the Federal Helium Reserve. The National Academies Press. ISBN 978-0-309-07038-6. Retrieved 2010-04-02.
• Emsley, John (1998). The Elements (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-855818-7.
• Vercheval, J. (2003). "The thermosphere: a part of the heterosphere". Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy. Archived from the original on 2005-01-01. Retrieved 2008-07-12.

External links

Listen to this article (58 minutes)

This audio file was created from a revision of this article dated 15 July 2009 (2009-07-15), and does not reflect subsequent edits.

(Audio help · More spoken articles)

General

• U.S. Government's Bureau of Land Management: Sources, Refinement, and Shortage. With some history of helium.
• U.S. Geological Survey publications on helium beginning 1996: Helium
• Where is all the helium? Aga website
• It's Elemental – Helium
• Chemistry in its element podcast (MP3) from the Royal Society of Chemistry's Chemistry World: Helium
• International Chemical Safety Cards – Helium includes health and safety information regarding accidental exposures to helium

More detail

• Helium at The Periodic Table of Videos (University of Nottingham)
• Helium Archived 2005-04-12 at the Wayback Machine at the Helsinki University of Technology; includes pressure-temperature phase diagrams for helium-3 and helium-4
• Lancaster University, Ultra Low Temperature Physics – includes a summary of some low temperature techniques
• Video: Demonstration of superfluid helium (Alfred Leitner, 1963, 38 min.)

Miscellaneous

• Physics in Speech with audio samples that demonstrate the unchanged voice pitch
• Article about helium and other noble gases

Helium shortage

• America's Helium Supply: Options for Producing More Helium from Federal Land: Oversight Hearing before the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources of the Committee on Natural Resources, U.S. House Of Representatives, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, First Session, Thursday, July 11, 2013
• Helium Program: Urgent Issues Facing BLM's Storage and Sale of Helium Reserves: Testimony before the Committee on Natural Resources, House of Representatives Government Accountability Office
• Kramer, David (May 22, 2012). "Senate bill would preserve US helium reserve: Measure would give scientists first dibs on helium should a shortage develop. Physics Today web site". Archived from the original on October 27, 2012.
• Richardson, Robert C.; Chan, Moses (2009). "Helium, when will it run out?" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-06-14.